GRUNDLÄGGANDE
MÄNSKLIGA RÄTTIGHETER 2015¦22 — UNIVERSUMS
HISTORIA | a
production 2022VI8 | LatestUpdate: 2024-03-23 ♦ HumanRight
is a knowledge domain
innehåll
denna sida · webbSÖK äMNESORD på
denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning över alla webbsidor · Universums Historia
content ¦ PLANTOxygen16FILTER
¦ PROPERTIES
¦ ORIGIN ¦ CarbonSINK ¦ Wood
Profiting ¦ Scary
Vegetation — Sweden’s Contribution to Most Governmental Popular Education ¦ WindPower ¦ EnergyLAW
¦ WHACNE
BILDKÄLLA: Författarens arkiv · MONTAGE: 19Jun2013 E20 Bild8 — 2Okt2010
E9 Bild5 — 13Jun2013 E14 Bild28 · Nikon D90
8Jun2022IN: WindBASICS ¦ HARMONY ¦ EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS — our right to develop as natural humans in a natural nature on
a natural Earth : HumanRight respect ¦ WIND ¦ noIntegral
Sweden-NewsJun2022:
A WORLD of humans WITH DEFINITE severe catastrophic ISSUES
— IN CONSTRUCTIVE COMPANIONSHIP
WITH NATURE from the start apparently advised as: brains. Thinking without pain.
Why is that a problem today — how did it come to this?
Very Interesting Quest.
SWEDISH with associates — not
by plan but by drift, with attached
inducements —
STATE ATTACKS LIFE apparently beginning
from some 1800+ ..
for
• WOOD PROFITING ENTERPRISE .. there are
alternatives, but not in this present era of technology ..
• ”scary
vegetation”
, Sw. ”skrämmande grönska” — the state administration has mental issues ..
• BLAMING INSECTS TO CAUSE TREE DEATH —
general world popular public media 2010+ .. we are innocent ..
• ”carbon sink” — the worst of it all ..
• ”bio fuel” .. not even on my best day .. society
has completely lost its manifest ..
..
A world of humans with definite severe catastrophic
issues — in ANY constructive companionship with nature. Why, how: when?
LEAF&NEEDLE + Sunlight MADE HUMANS on a
rough time scale in 3Gy ¦ 100% — no
Swedish State cutting.
SEVERE DEFORESTATION BEGINS 1800+. After 200 years 2000: 30%
original forest area removed: — UN/IPCC:
»We will do fine fine 70% — and decreasing». No proclaimed global alarm.
BIOAREA ¦ GLOBAL WATCHERS.
SocialMEDIA — SocialPART1: 3Jun2022: — INTRODUCTION
— SocialPART2 ¦ HumanRight
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
DECISION OUTSIDE
HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION HAS ONLY POWER TO DESTROY: THERE IS NO EXCEPTION.
— What are you trying to say? Plain Vector Math. HumanRight is a Knowledge Domain: gravitation, electricity: LIFE:
• STATE
APPARENTLY ATTACKS IT — when not recognizing HumanRight: nature: life. Say
again. On DRIFT. Never plan.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
SocialMedia Part I:
Social Media
HumanRight EXCLUDES COOKIES
— cookies exclude HumanRight: society has lost its manifest (4Nov2020+)
”We use cookies to give you the best experience ..”
WHO GAVE YOU PERMISSION TO INTERRUPT ME IN MY WORK — IF THE MENU HAS NOT HUMAN RIGHTS ON ITS SPECIFICATIONS?
— And when did that happen?
IF YOU CARE FOR MY PRIVACY, HOW COME YOU CONSTANTLY INTERRUPT MY PRIVACY WITHOUT MY EXPLICIT PERMISSION?
STOP KILLING HUMANITY:
”best experience” IS UNIVERSALLY GOVERNED BY EACH INDIVIDUAL FOR ITS OWN SELF — GENERAL SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION (A29.1, UDHR10Dec1948) WITH EACH INDIVIDUAL’S OWN PERSONAL CHOICE — TO BE EVALUATED BY ALL THE OTHERS — ON A PERFECTLY FREE WORLD SOCIAL COMMUNITY individual INTERCOURSE BASIS. NOBODY ELSE. NOTHING ELSE — dear GOOGLE&MICROSOFT&World-Business-Enterprise-Trafficking-Humanity. Please stop killing humanity.
Say again:
CRIME does not develop in societies caring for HumanRight. Crime
only develops in societies where HumanRight is never mentioned, never related,
never cogitated, never reminded: never Recognized:
freedom, justice and peace in the world — P1. Microsoft&GOOGLE: not one single word. Not a sound.
Come again: cookies. Not One Word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint. Say again. Zero.
— In what way WOULD cookies connect to any kind, nature, type or sort of ”my best experience”?
It seems OTHER decides on THAT part — all other humans are — apparently have become 2018+ — TAGGED SUPERVISED CATTLE infants, »learning to experience BETTER» .. »Loke stuff: kneel before me» .. no access otherwise .. SCREAM IT TO THE MOON.
WORLD REPORT 2022 — It just gets worse: not one word humanRight.
My best experience IS MINE. My own individual. IT is apparently based on my own individual choices — no mind tampering from others type (2018+) interrupting ”tap the plate to get better: if not: no access”:
Stop collecting and tagging humans in categories, tagging and electronically mirror-forcing their interests, treating them like cattle for sale. Where on Earth is Jurisdiction?
TEST ANSWER:
• they don’t — even — understand the concept (Payed Bitches to Microsoft&Google .. say again ..).
Any instance claiming any other order apparently has NOT a serious interest in the human individual and its FREE — NOT electronically Mirrored — development. No way. Proof (A4: UDHR10Dec1948): Enhancement — developing human culture and civilization — is made on a FREE cooperation. NOT on Microsoft&Google’s Trafficking Humanity on not one word HumanRight muzzled individuals endowed with alike handcuffed point plates. It’s all some bad Hollywood movie (from the sixties).
• Recommendation to Sites: 1. USE DOOR BELL COUNTING to expose the most popular (by category).
2. Use HumanRight to communicate ON individuals in EVENTUALLY luring out what is ”BEST” — and make argumentative accounts on THAT. And stop excluding the individual from Internet by demanding a cookies acceptance for access. Interned did NOT work like that from the start. IT was OPEN PUBLIC. As a store or a park in the city — these days CLOSED.
• Stop killing HumanRight. STOP KILLING HUMANITY:
• Only one known instance ”knows” what is ”best for all”: the one claiming supremacy over intelligence.
— AND WHO MIGHT THAT BE, MICROSOFT AND GOOGLE? Please share.
• Only one known locality is known for holding that type of populations: satanism. By DRIFT. Not plan.
IT does not understand the concept of knowledge: HumanRight: Life.
• WHAT keeps that kind alive? Only candidate: Business Enterprise — outside HumanRight. Come again.
”.. set up an account on ..” SOCIAL MEDIA (Facebook, in example [YouTube is NOT open for humanity ..])
does not sound AT ALL, like a human rights project — but more an non-proclaimed exercising fascism — by DRIFT. Not plan;
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right
includes freedom to hold opinions without
interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas
through any media and regardless of frontiers.
A19 UDHR10Dec1948
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this
Declaration, without distiction of any kind,
such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion,
national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction
shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international
status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, wheter it be
independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of
sovereignty.
A2 UDHR10Dec1948
NOBODY CAN FORCE COOKIES ONTO THE INDIVIDUAL no access if not accepted AND AT THE SAME TIME CLAIM RECOGNITION OF HUMAN RIGHTS — because
The 24/7 PROJECT
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world,
P1 UDHR10Dec1948
— Children and animals seem to
get the hang of it directly from birth. So — Microsoft&GOOGLE: where?
ALL OTHER INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSING apparently DEFINES EXERCISING OPPRESSION: not-freedom, not-justice, not-peace: non-proclaimed exercising fascism — by SO drift. Not plan. Say again:
NOBODY CAN PUSH COOKIES IMPORTANCE ONTO THE INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT PUSHING HUMAN RIGHTS RECOGNITION TO A SECOND LEVEL OF A FOREMOST 24/7 RECOGNITION (”of the greatest importance”, P7) MEANING: focusing on COOKIES forces a CLAIM of SUPREMACY OVER HUMAN RIGHT where human right is NOT even mentioned — NOT RECOGNIZED:
Now, therefore,
The General Assembly,
Proclaims this
Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for
all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this
Declaration constantly in mind,
shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and
freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure
their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the
peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under
their jurisdiction.
P8 UDHR10Dec1948
: EVERY INDIVIDUAL AND EVERY ORGAN OF SOCIETY, KEEPING THIS DECLARATION CONSTANTLY IN MIND — constantly = 24/7. No breaks. Not one single pico second. No way (The Mind of a Child);
Meaning, consequences, and bottom line:
• Cookies — »all ”organized” social media» — DENIES forces a denial of HUMAN RIGHTS recognition;
— Addressing the individual OUTSIDE explicit human rights recognition — the inherent dignity — defines exercising oppression — not by proclamation or any plan, but by DRIFT. That is the Law: plain consequential vector math.
Claim whatever you want, United Nations, in whatever manner you want, at any time:
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights
A1 UDHR10Dec1948 — EQUAL IN DIGNITY: — equal
”.. and all of you are children of the most High”. King James Bible Ps.82:6.
Any other claim becomes a manifestation of Satanism: fascism. By DRIFT. Not by plan;
DO YOU SEE ANY RESEMBLANCE?
Israel thus stands between God and humanity, representing each to the other.
MICROSOFT ENCARTA 99 ENCYCLOPEDIA, Judaism — Basic Doctrines and Sources
HumanRight IS ALREADY Social Media: Mind
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
Humans DON’T HAVE TO LOG IN TO THEIR OWN NATURE BY ACCEPTING COOKIES FOR SOCIAL ACCESS. If so:
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————
• A foundation of NOT-freedom,
NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the world is claiming property — and Land:
” Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal
and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world”,
P1 UDHR10Dec1948:
• Individual Addressing Outside
Human Right recognition apparently defines exercising oppression.
• A foundation of NOT-freedom,
NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the world is claiming property and land.
• HumanRight — NOT BY
CONSTRUCTION, BUT BY NATURE: recognition. 24/7. Innate. Mind stuff.
Life.
Background: HumanRightRecognition
— Human Evolution Knowledge:
when the human first realizes its self-awareness (some 200 00 years ago):
• The Script as a physical text — connecting True Knowledge —
apparently cannot be older:
THE (found) TWELVE PROPERTIES INSIDE THE HUMAN MIND — Jacob’s 12 Sons — Jacob later renamed as ISRAEL »for you have fought with men and god and won victory» : (the struggle to understand The Basics)
• MIND (Sw.: sinne ¦ Swedish translators often translates as hjärna, Eng.: brain; Example from MATRIX ”The body cannon live without the mind”; Swedish text ”Kroppen kan inte leva utan hjärnan”, Eng.: ”The body cannot live without the brain” — Sweden has severe Issues ..). Not body. Not flesh. Not Geography. Say again. Come again:
Properties: Background ¦ PossibleORIGIN
SIMEON is not mentioned in explicit in the
list in Deuteronomy / 5Mos.33 ¦ in 1Mos / Genesis.49:5 ”Simeon and Levi are brethren ..”.
———————————————————————————————————————————————————
temper wrath right
knowledge resolution friendship
courage defense firmness
responsibility wisdom questioning
———————————————————————————————————————————————————
humör, Ruben (Bibeln 1917: 1Mos.49:3 ”Ruben, min förstfödde är du ..”), eng. temper ¦ Också Djurets Rätt (also AnimalRight).
IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE?
— Are there any other?
These (found) 12 properties (dormant animal self consciousness) inside the nature of the human mind have been extracted by comparing the texts between the Swedish 1917 Bible and the (1611) King James Bible. There are several (other) possible synonyms. But the ones here chosen have appeared as the most fair and just context interpretations.
• The described properties apparently reflects and relates to MIND. Not flesh or body — as in
• ”.. all of you are children of the most HIGH ..” Ps.82:6.
• ”Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.”, John.4:22.
— »Only by Knowledge — insight — the human individual reaches enlightenment» (principally basic Buddha teaching);
• ”Ye are of your
father, the devil” with further (whole chapter 8, especially), John.8:44 — »addressing
The FleshJews»[‡].
The whole chapter 8 in
John exposes a heavy and hostile casuistry quarrel and disputation between
claims on Old Testament Biblical Copyright — »we have Abraham and God as our
father» and the opposing sayings from the Jesus man — »I am the way, the truth
and the life; I and the father are one; Before Abraham was, I am; you have the
devil as your father». Said on a strict casuistry: IF the Jesus man is a true
witness of truth, he cannot at the one standing end certify that ”for salvation is of the Jews”
and in addressing the ones claiming themselves to be Jews
at the other one standing
end claim ”Ye are of your father,
the devil” — other than this:
• No mother god loving way The Old Testament
Bible — Israel —
has the addressed »FleshJews»
— satanists: »we stand above humanity:
higher»
— as its origin. No way. They claim it — and still (1948: ISRAEL IN
PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHICAL SHAPE) dictate — onto geography — biblical namings after
their self protecting biblical recitation
— apparently continuing
to collect further claims of divine origin nobody else has
— supported by United Nations
(Balfour Declaration 1917).
The only one RESOLUTION in this dilemma,
just taking the Jesus man on his words, apparently is; And so it began in the
past history, in a time of strong oppositions:
• A SECT claims itself a divine property — as
it still is working today — on the basis of a spiritual very (very) old ancient
script (under debate, as it still is) — whose only preserved original was laid
in the hands of the betrayers — the satanists — also certifying their own
survival as SUCH — until revealed (”the end of time”). Meaning:
The Old Testament SHOULD (the Jesus man apparently
says) be Very Old. Apparently.
Dodge that one, any one who can.
In some other possible shorter words: FROM THE BEGINNING it was known that humanity has a UNITIVE divine origin (Jacob’s Sons or Israel, the 12 properties, the divine human nature). No differences. However as greed for power and authority developed, as now everybody should have noticed — our famous known ancient history with strong opposing claims — only one specific Claim was needed to burn the fuse: »It is US that stand closer to God». NOT you. Then »hell broke lose» [MindRape — by drift, not plan] — because nobody knew how to RELATE the origin — and firmly advise the Claim to a Short but effective: Stand Back. The Jesus man said it. Say again.
• THE SCRIPT (HUMAN RIGHT ORIGIN) APPARENTLY has nothing at all to do with geography
— as type claiming land or special MIND status. But just that is gushing out of the establishment, despite
• ”.. all of you are children of the most HIGH ..” Ps.82:6. So, conclusively apparently:
UNITED NATIONS, claim whatever you want, in whatever manner you want, at any time:
— Return Palestine — NOW. 24/7. ISRAEL and JUDAH have nothing to do with geography, flesh or body.
Unless UN is about to enter A Well Related Proclaimed Fascism:
IT IS THE HUMAN NATURE — apparently raped by old United Nations (from Balfour Declaration 1917).
• No land. No body. No flesh. No claim OTHER then ”.. and all of you are children of the most High”.
Come again.
JESUS — »ISRAEL’S MOST PUBLIC POPULAR CHARACTER IN JERUSALEM POPULATIONS .. Jerusalem News ..» ..
ISRAEL and JUDAH APPARENTLY ARE PROPERTIES
NO FUCKING PHYSICS
BELONGING TO EACH HUMAN INDIVIDUAL MIND
And apparently as long as that
is not recognized, the whole world-violence will only escalate, creating
further hostile attitudes and even more violence. No stop. Wake up.
ALWAYS WAS. IS NOW. ALWAYS WILL BE. The Script: CLAIMED BY A CERTAIN TESTIFIED ”Ye are of your father, the devil” with further (whole chapter 8, especially), John.8:44, DRIFTING POPULATION — CONSTANTLY NAMING GEOGRAPHY AFTER THE CONTEXT — AMONG RAGING VILLAINS EAGER FOR POWER AND CONTROL IN ORDER TO SAFELY PRESERVE THE ORIGIN FOR A FUTURE FULL RESOLUTION — as it can be understood. AT PRESENT (14Jun2022):
• PICTURING A world of humans with definite and deeply severe catastrophic issues
— in any exemplifyable constructive companionship with nature.
SWEDEN 2018 — once a placid place ..
Sweden is exaggerating its
further global governmental care for Universal Animal Rights .. MustBuyBook.
• Why, how?
• When?
»Intelligence Artificialized on Human Recession»
Individual Addressing Outside Human Right
recognition defines exercising oppression:
• AI artificial intelligence. Cookies. Fascism. Nazism. Satanism. Dictatorship. Pick one.
— AI: RELATE RECOGNITION OF HUMAN RIGHT. Say again.
— Is there an answer in there? Please share.
• Not one word HumanRight. You can’t communicate humanity with machines. Stop killing humanity. Stop degenerating wit. Stop degrading humanity. Stop treating humanity as tagged cattle.
— Ask The Machine: Do you
understand HumanRight. Did you really expect an answer?
— Do you understand the sophisticated — speedy — very — and fast — combinations of responsibility and judgment inside the human mind? Please do share. Give us one single example. There are no such mathematical computational algorithms. THESE DO EXIST ONLY IN POPULAR HOLLYWOOD PRODUCTIONS. Stop stupidize humanity — depriving it of its care for judgment and responsibility: what keeps the Brain Fresh and Alert.
— Stupid VOLVO FuckUp Aces. Please excuse the language. I have documented examples.
A NOT SOBER, NOT THOROUGHLY RESTED PERSON IS REFUSED TO ENTER HIS MACHINE HALL, UNTIL SOBER AND FULLY RESTED — OTHERWISE MORE BY RULE THAN EXCEPTION: accidents.
EXACTLY THE SAME APPLIES TO CAR DRIVING: WE DON’T DRIVE A CAR UNLESS FRESH AND 100% FOCUSED — AWARE OF THE FACT THAT ELSE-WAY AN ACCIDENT IS ON THE MENU. WHAT KIND OF A STATE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT — WITH CORRESPONDING RUNNING INFORMATION AND HEALTH CARE EDUCATION — VOLVO? We never drive unfocused. 24/7. Non stop.
.. with voice control .. — CAR INDUSTRY’S idea of intelligence IS DEGENERATING HUMANITY’S NATURAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE LEVEL OF PERSONAL JUDGMENT AND RESPONSIBILITY, ATTRACTING DRUNKS, HALF CONSCIOUS AND LOW EDUCATED VEHICLE DRIVING MENTALITIES AS IF A NEW ERA OF GLOBAL CHARITY: the less the human uses Brains, the more smell of rotting lettuce. Compare the graveyard — not for the living, only for the dead: nobody survived. Stop killing humanity.
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world,
P1 UDHR10Dec1948
VOLVO is possibly about
to enhance this report to include computerized Drivers Alert supervision —
degrading a human to an invalid needing help to understand where the wheels are
at — with the tremendous speed of light as the king pin shaft of Volvic
Intelligence. MustBuyBook. Never have we seen such human stupidity in practice:
• comprehension of wit is a STATE of mind.
Not a SPEED in physics. Back off.
— IF you want to make
cars with handicap features, put a sign on the car »speed limit» so we can see
it: — »WARNING: Handicap Vehicle — max 30 — no printed users manual inside»: DeadBrain.
Proof:
Not one word HumanRight in
• AI. Cookies. Fascism. Nazism. Satanism. Dictatorship .. anything except HumanRight
• Not a sound. Not even a smallest hint.
• AND IT GUARANTEED NEVER WILL BE (VectorMath):
By Drift — turning ones back to HumanRight. No declaration or proclamation needed.
• Never by plan:
• foundation of NOT-freedom, NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the world
— Why ”never by plan”?
— IF you have a detailed scenario — please share;
VectorMath:
»ForceTEACHING», Sw. »KraftLÄRA»
VECTOR MATH outside basic KNOWLEDGE opposes and contradicts its own intended purpose (the definition of madness): insanity can never reach the sane. Meaning: LIFE is — must be — based on harmony.
It is impossible to deny harmony and meaning without violating ones own idea of consistency. Example 1:
— Nothing lasts forever, a popular sentence these days. Proof: So: When does that claim cease? Ex2:
— Life has no meaning. Proof:
Meaning the claim means what? Statement presupposes a Truth that the statement
was or is — meaning — a statement, whether true or not. And? As no sane human
denies its own claim, ”no meaning” apparently is a specifically »fucked up»
example: Some Ideas in Society have a really bad destructive influence over the
population .. In general: »I am suffering — in this culture: a prison it
is».
That is apparently LAW. Humans do bad things by DRIFT (ignorance and moral blindness). Never by plan.
BUT IT OFTEN SEEMS TO. Building society on HumanRight is An Art. Very tricky Tech: Native GirlWit:
• GIVEN HARMONY
any DisHarmony projects a CAUSING VECTOR pushing reason until resolved.
• Decisions (consensus) without HumanRightRecognition have only power to destroy:
• return Palestine — NOW. 24/7. UN made a real bad decision 1917. Present world situation reflects That.
• HumanRight is ALREADY social media: mind. Our voice wherever and whoever we are.
— No distinction whatsoever. No stopping, no tracing, no surveillance, no registration. Just You. (Internet type 1995).
• Stop playing around with »New Microsoft&Google Enterprise»
— and throw them out of humanity. NOW:
HumanRight EXCLUDES COOKIES
— cookies exclude HumanRight:
society has lost its manifest (4Nov2020+)
No more weather information access — and neither any else: police, court, government, health department .. Sweden 2020: Microsoft&Google demand cookies acceptance from 4Nov2020 to access these — end even ones own e-mail domain. Where are the jurisdictional authorities? They don’t answer. The Police Department gives no response on the situation. »We are just Bitches to Microsoft&Google New World Business Enterprise, and there is nothing we can do».
• Not one word HumanRight.
It is scaring .. violence gushes freely .. Not one word against ..
(P8
”constantly in mind”, ”every individual .. every organ”).
Sweden
has lost its manifest. Most certainly clearly.
— And there is no instance on this planet we can turn to: nobody is listening to HumanRight.
”YouTube (owned by Google) does not allow anonymous video access”: non-proclaimed exercising fascism.
”X does not allow anonymous visual access with humanity”.
Microsoft: ”Restart your computer or we will do it for you”.
GOOGLE DOES NOT ALLOW A FREE AND OPEN INDIVIDUAL
VIEWING — AS IF DENIED GAZING INTO A STORE’S WINDOW OR A LIBRARY’S MENU OF
BOOKS AND LITERATURE, FINDING OUT WHAT’S INSIDE: NO FREE UNBOUND ACCESS
— Excuse me: What in the world do humanity cling to such an instance for? What’sUp? We don’t accept fascism in any kind of open fashion.
— Is GOOGLE necessarily a fascistic instance (not one word HumanRight)?
— Why does UN allow THIS TYPE OF OPEN GLOBAL Trafficking?
Previously classic open customer
business consultation and free public social exchange has transferred the
customer and person to a supervised tagged muzzled prisoner — with a handcuffed
point plate ..
— Are these blind to the content of UDHR10Dec1948 — (P7) ”of the greatest importance” — ?
— Do these not see that the world today (only within a century) is ruled by a non-proclaimed »KIND» fascism
— by DRIFT. Not by any deliberate
plan other than what follows from (Dolan’s Cadillac) Business Enterprise.
• Taking advantage of the fact that humanity Jun2022 has no idea of the content of HumanRight.
— No? Where UN?
Claim whatever you want, United Nations, in whatever manner you want, at any time:
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights
A1 UDHR10Dec1948 — EQUAL IN DIGNITY: — equal
”.. and all of you are children of the most High”. King James Bible Ps.82:6.
Any other claim becomes a manifestation of Satanism: fascism. By DRIFT. Not by plan;
DO YOU SEE ANY RESEMBLANCE?
Israel thus stands between God and humanity, representing each to the other.
MICROSOFT ENCARTA 99 ENCYCLOPEDIA, Judaism — Basic Doctrines and Sources
UN: STOP PUSHING HUMANITY INTO BUSINESS’ SLAVERY: Israel
occupation of human properties transferred into an idea of a corporeal
species of brains:
• non-proclaimed satanism launched
1917 by united nations — as it can be interpreted ..
STOP BLEEDING IDEAS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH ONTO A PLANET WITH LIMITED MASS AND LIMITED RESOURCES MEANING: everybody cannot win: STOP Killing HumanRight. STOP USER LICENSE ON PEN AND RUBBER: COMPUTERS, TOOLS FOR HUMANITY TO DEVELOP ON.
• Let humanity develop freely: establish discontinuous Internet server technology to kill further hacking
(EXAMPLES of Private-Safe Internet-ACCESS — will of cooperation is missing)
• Recognize HumanRight. HUMANITY DEVELOPED COMPUTERS. NOT ANY SINGLE COMPANY.
• World Jurisdictional CONCEPT of Copyright — ownership — has to come to its senses: HumanRight;
A4 UDHR10Dec1948 — STOP HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE:
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude;
slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Trafficking: taking advantage
of humanity’s need for development by charging (annual) fees for writing,
viewing, spelling, and so on, blocking/claiming user restrictions on such:
direct fascism
SLAVERY:
• A state of personal NoFreedom: NoPersonalChoiceOfCompanionShip. 0. Others Dictate Such Choices.
• Swedish 5 word classic dictionary definition of slavery (BKL X 1927sp.983);
• ”ett tillstånd av personlig ofrihet”.
APPARENTLY (4Nov2020+) WORLD’S MOST PROMINENT OFFENDERS IN HUMAN TRAFFICKING:
• Microsoft&Google.
”YouTube (owned by Google) does not allow anonymous video access”:
— non-proclaimed exercising fascism;
”X does not allow anonymous visual access with humanity”.
New Microsoft Business Enterprise:
”Restart your computer or we will do it for you”.
WAKE UP WORLD AND THROW THESE HUMANITY DESTRUCTIVE INTRUDERS OUT
— at zero cost, no violence through the same door they came. LIBERTY TO HUMANITY.
Trees — Earth life power sustaining Leaf&Needle sunlight receivers — are NOT for providing energy in any sort, type or kind on an industrial scale. IS THERE a state administration understanding that SUCH causes a proportional reduction in sustaining life power ? Humans don’t eat their legs and arms.
— Undisturbed, during a rough 3Gy, these Leaf&Needle natural stand ups constructed THE HUMAN FACE.
— And now, suddenly (specially some 2010+) state administration has proclaimed itself an emperor of these Face Producing Skilled Brain Designing Promoters?
I don’t think so. No way. The New Age Modern State Administration has raised itself up as an enemy against nature. So, say it: You are dead end 100 wrong about that.
— BUT YOU CAN’T FIGHT THE WORLD STATE
ADMINISTRATIONS! No way!
— And who said I would have to? It is apparently sufficient they fight their own comprehensive nature to generate sufficiently enough stupidity for compelling proof.
NATURE IS HERE TO HELP. NOT TO KILL.
• BUSINESS ENTERPRISE and their Bitches TAKES NO KNOWLEDGE HumanRight ARGUMENTATION
Where is the world’s jurisdiction?
AT OUR AGENDA TODAY: we have to solve these
problems. Now.
Visually documented heavy increase in Swedish reduction of original natural cyclic
Leaf&Needle, Summer 2022 MidSweden:
SWEDEN ATTACKS LIFE — by DRIFT. Not plan.
WHAT
EXACTLY IS GOING ON HERE — apart from looting and sacking? WHERE exactly is
ANY AT ALL VISUAL PROOF of
Technological Environmental CARE? I
DON’T SEE ANY.
— Why ”takes not
knowledge arguments”?
— Because it can’t. Business Enterprise
outside HumanRight defines a DOMAIN level of undeveloped
intelligence:
• It does not understand
the concept. DO YOU SEE ANY? Please
share.
— It is like pouring
water into an already filled bucket. Come again.
• Provision for use of organic
life — biofuel — for energy extraction large scale industry: does not exist in Universe;
• Life on Earth builds on a closed fixed biological oxygen-carbon-cyclic system (CO2 → C+O2 → CO2..). 100% preserved — and protected as such — IT apparently — US after some 3Gy: nose, mouth, finger .. — certifies the entire life support — health basics — on a constant surviving nature’s construct: Earth’s limited biomass: our body. All of it. Is any SUPPORTING part removed, the effect will inevitable be the same as to crop parts from an individual being. We call that, and reflect that: madness. An idiot. Insanity. State-Lost Manifest. Life attack.
Bevisligen in till sista atom, uppenbarligen
och tydligen i 100, SVERIGE särskilt:
— Varför har inte svenska moderna svenska
vetenskapsakademins besättningar, vilka de nu än kan och må vara, själva — hela
1900-talets etablerade geologiska forskningslitteratur och resultat, rakt
framför ögonen — ens brytt sig i att TESTA den ytterst enkla men omfattande
sammanställda KVANTITATIVA — vägande — räkningen som visar det resultatet (CWON ¦ BioEK1-10) — Jordytans isotopiska
ämnessammansättningar i AtmosBiosLitos enbart på grundämnena (HONC)
VäteSyreKväveKol:
———————————————
MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ AR123-CWONsum ¦ BIOYTAN ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ PrimDATA ¦ EarthMass ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ BioSURF
Varför, Svenska Vetenskapsakademin? Inte på
grund av något Naturligt Förakt välan heller, nej, eller?
Heltalslösning
med exponenter: Jordmasssan definieras av vatten och biomassa: <±3GRAM — i flera korsreferende kommunicerande kvantiteter.
— Jo: man brydde sig aldrig om att ens
undersöka HARMONILÖSNINGEN (CAP) bakom livsgrunderna.
Varför, Svenska Vetenskapsakademin?
— Definitivt INTE på grund av ”bristande
intelligens”. Den är det definitivt inget fel på.
•
Däremot bevekelsegrunden för att använda innehållet — på
människorättsligt baserade grunder.
Säg.
Visa. Ge exempel:
Man
förkastade redan från 1800+ varje form och idé om ”livets harmoni” (jämför det
elaka akademiska entropibegreppet [‡]) — med det främsta
modernt akademiska mest populära husdjuret: ”vattnet
kom utifrån”. Konsensus — uppfinning av en egen speciellt fin akademisk
natur för att behaga herrskapet. Inte härledningar. Inte ens en minsta
tillstymmelse till FÖRSÖK till självgranskande undersökning. Man körde INTE
bara rakt över den möjligheten: Man stannade, lade i backen, och började backa
över också. Om inte den meningsformen är helkass, har svenska
vetenskapsakademin i en hast hamnat SIST i klasserna matematik, fysik och kemi.
Säg. Rätta gärna om fel. Femte klassens naturlära.
— Det Moderna Akademiska Föraktet för
naturharmonierna sticker ut som långa grova pinnar från en påle. Och Sveriges
Riksdag hakar på, som om det gällde en världsgala i välgörenhet för femte
klassens läroplan i elementär naturlära. Förutsättningarna var bättre år 1311.
• En
Förening blev utesluten redan från ruta ett.
Vad går bevisningen ut på — kvantitativt i reda matematik och fysik?
— Jordlivets biofysik och kemi baseras på ett konstant fast självunderhållande cykliskt biomassystem. Dess autonomt (självstyrande/självreglerande) LEVANDE fysik är INTE avsedd för energiutvinning (”ekonomisk tillväxt”, ”lönsamhet”, ”investering”): Varje TAFS visar: naturvandalisering. Livskraftsförsvagning.
— FOSSILKOLET (teorierna i slutet av 1800-talet och början av 1900-talet har av allt att döma den rätta ansatsen) har en helt annan geologisk historia än den idag förhärskande — också med tämligen övertygande bevisning på redan välkänt material. Men med en helt annorlunda framtoning (som dessutom medger i varje fall teoretiskt/kvantitativt att [mycket] mer bergolja finns lagrat i litosfären än den hittills använda — möjligen, och utan att den räkningen stör den övriga bevisningen). Bevisningen är INTE av typen komplicerad — garanterat. Men den är omfattande: rubbet eller så inte alls.
Femte klassens elementära naturlära. Sverige: hallå? Inte minsta knäpp. Inte ett ljud. Salarna står tomma. Övergivna. Öde. Helt knäpp tyst. Inte en själ. Inte ett pip.
• Jordfysiken själv har trätt fram (Jun2020) med otvetydiga kvantitativa avgörande bevis. Finns det flera personer i Sverige som har gjort räkningen, eller bara en? Fy skam.
• Och så var det en annan sak också, Sveriges Riksdag, Polis och Domstolar:
HumanRight EXCLUDES COOKIES
— cookies exclude HumanRight: society has lost its manifest (4Nov2020+)
Proof:
• Not one word HumanRight. Test recognition.
IF YOU FUCKING CARE ON MY PRIVACY WHY THE FUCK DO YOU KEEP
INTERRUPTING ME IN MY FUCKING WORK WITHOUT MY FUCKING EXPLICIT PERMISSION?
— Are you deaf or just stupid?
BEFOLKNINGEN BEHANDLAS
SOM TAGGAD — ETIKETTERAD — ÖVERVAKAD BOSKAP: STATSFÖRVALTNINGEN KOMMUNICERAR
INTE MED BEFOLKNINGEN I ANSVAR OCH OMDÖME, DEN BYGGER ISTÄLLET VÄGGUPP. DEN
UNDERVISAR INTE BEFOLKNINGEN, DEN LÄGGER ISTÄLLET IN RELIEFER I
VÄGMARKERINGARNA SOM GER HÖGA LJUDSIGNALER NÄR DE VIDRÖRS AV DE FRAMRUSANDE
RULLANDE GUMMIDÄCKEN PÅ FORDON SOM FRAMFÖRS AV EN ALLT MER UTARMAT
ANSVARSKÄNNANDE OCH OMDÖMESUPPFATTANDE BEFOLKNING. OCH SÅ VIDARE. INTE ETT
KNÄPP ”varje individ och varje organ i
samhället, hållande denna Förklaring oförtrutet i åtanke ..”: NATIONELLA
KAMPANJER 24/7. OFÖRTRÖTTLIGT. OFÖRTRUTET. Inte ett knyst. ISTÄLLET SÄTTER MAN
UPP FARTKAMEROR FÖR ATT FORTSÄTTA UTÖVA LYDNAD OCH BESTRAFFNING ÖVER DEN
OLYDIGA BEFOLKNINGEN I VANLIG TRADITIONELL ORDNING. OM STATEN VERKLIGEN BRYDDE
SIG, VARFÖR INFÖRS INTE MAX HASTIGHET 5KM/h MED BILBÄLTE, VILKET GARANTERAT
REDUCERAR ALLA TRAFIKDÖDSFALL TILL NOLL, VARFÖR INTE? BUSINESS. RENT
OPROKLAMERAT — PÅ DRIFT, INTE PLAN — SATANISTISKT SKIT: »VI TILLÅTER VISST
SVINN — ÄVEN BARN». FY FÖR DEN LEDE. STATEN TVINGAR BEFOLKNINGEN ATT MEDVERKA.
Clarify this:
• Business Enterprise IN ITSELF has no developed intelligence for grasping the idea of KNOWLEDGE: HumanRight: gravitation, electricity: life. Business Enterprise in itself only cares, and understands, the concept of QUALITY (Dolan's Cadillac, 2009: Trafficking): The management cannot sell rotten lettuce, at least not as fresh vegetation for food. Consequence: Business Enterprise management — in itself — has no comprehending tool for a response to environmental argumentation (HumanRight). This is what happens when we try::
— Pouring water into an already filled bucket — Business Enterprise in itself: we Own You — only results in the poured water — attempted knowledge argumentation — returning to its ground source. At most, the management adds a laugh at the poor fool, with some added mocking of type “Enjoy a beautiful bald cut”, Sw. ”Njut av ett vackert kalhygge”. Human developed stupidity — by (1800+) DRIFT, not plan — exemplified. Not by plan because intelligence is built on harmony. Compare Our Mother The Woman: She »Sweet Mother Freya» has no Properties for developing stupidity or violence — only CARE OF LIFE.
• So, the bottom line becomes: Business Enterprise IN ITSELF resembles an intelligible infant: IT — the business part, not the infant — has no concept of HumanRight. Treat it like that, and you'll see the real steel of Quality; knowledge managing business: zero Trafficking; zero Rape; zero Attacks on Nature — (A29.1 UDHR10Dec1948).
NATURAL POLICY TO BE
DEFENDED AND PROVED: See also same type of Swedish documented photos in the
collection FACIT 2015+:
• NATURE FOREST — Leaf&Needle, the sunlight chlorophyll
life sustaining agents — apparently are for securing/protecting/certifying
Earth-LIFE’S continued cyclic maintenance — on 100% Leaf&Needle;
• They are NOT for profit. And we have to solve all present technical-environmental issues connected to That one — successfully.
• They are NOT for providing energy (»taking alive arms, legs, and stuff by consequence») in any sort, type or kind on an industrial scale: reduced life power. IF that case: Someone missed THE Tech OnRamp.
• Leaf&Needle on a rough time period of 3Gy (natural woman evolution) — no interference from Swedish Authorities — secured the general global biological evolution and maintaining DNA morphological force chemistry for all species and all life. That so apparently upon the (at least) 8 flat Earth Area chlorophyll sunlight up taking surface — as reckoned from the last known (ForestWORLD2012) 100% preserved nature forest (P8REF) — our only known 100% natural forest preference: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2; ¦ AR123-CWONsum ¦ BIOYTAN ¦ BioSURF ;
• 1800+ large scale industrial deforestation begins. After 200 years (2000) more than 30% of the original 100% 3Gy Sun pool is removed;
• Do you
really expect — Sweden and others — reckon or conceive, that LIFE on a continued 70%
will do all right? Say again. Come again.
— No. No mother god loving way. You are apparently not aware of what you have been involved in. And majority decisions will not help you on this one. Back off. HumanRight it is.
UNITED NATIONS DOES NOT RECOGNIZE
HUMAN
RIGHT — main headline to be handled, now:
NEW DISCOVERY in
UniverseHistory 8Jun2022
— MustBuyBook:
”Everybody
knows we are in the midst of a global battle for dominance in AI technology”
— Not this author — until
recently made observant through the quoted article:
IF that WOULD be the
case, as stated in the quote, THAT battle was already settled and finished from
square one: ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE IS A PROJECTED
HANDCUFFED POINT PLATE TYPE HOLLYWOOD PRODUCTION WITH ZERO APPLICABILITY IN
HUMAN COMPREHENSION. It has only power to destroy, inflict and degrade. Say
again.
8Jun2022 — NATIONAL ACADEMICS — Science •
Engineering • Medicine
Human
Rights in Age of Social Media, Big Data, and AI
Feature Story | September 23, 2019
By Molly Galvin | Sept. 23, 2019, NAC2019ref
— Battle? That was a new one. HERE we see only
a sewer of combating Business Enterprise CPU aces trying to win the price of
the foremost — most — excellent empty in the history of human culture,
technology and science in general: killing HumanRight 100%.
IAOHR — Say it: You’re wrong: »Intelligence ’Artificialized’ on Human Recession» — a DOWN. Not an Up. Manipulation. Fascism unproclaimed.
Individual Addressing Outside Human Right
recognition defines exercising oppression:
• AI in
explicit. Cookies. Fascism. Nazism. Satanism. Dictatorship. Pick one.
A machine cannot handle the
human native comprehensive domain of thinking: the STATE of mind. No mother god
loving way. Not even on my best day.
— The only reason any human
would even THINK about a possibility is by OBLIVION on that nature: a lost
manifest. A Stupid Ace.
Proof: Not one word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not even a smallest hint.
By Drift. Never by plan.
—
Foremost Enterprising Bitches: national police, national court. Does not lift
one finger. Just lets it all flow out. Say.
— Now — please — Mr AI Machine Programming Crew:
• Say something Intelligent. Please Share. Show us. Dazzle us. Bring Light Forth. Absolutely. Math. Physics. Show. Any the smallest itty bitty tiny piece, any atom of it, please.
HUMAN
RIGHT RECOGNITION — read it and weep 24/7 (P8 ”constantly in mind”, ”every individual .. every
organ”):
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family
is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
P1 UDHR10Dec1948
EVERYTHING
ELSE BECOMES THE DEFINITION OF Not one word HumanRight
not freedom,
not justice and
not peace in the world:
• nazism, fascism,
dictatorship, satanism: Pick one.
CRIME,
VIOLENCE, INTRUSION, DISRESPECT IS FREELY GUSHING RIGHT OUT OVER HUMANITY
By
DRIFT. Never Plan. No Conspiracy. Never. Just Ignorance (oblivion: society
loses its manifest)
• believing itself personalized
to have divine properties:
• special intelligence. Higher fathoming.
DRIFT. Not plan. Consuming everything in its path: not one word HumanRight.
• That would not be a problem if the Agent could show
only one itty bitty tiny single proof of the claimed supremacy:
StillSearching: P8REF
• Still searching for. Only yet found:
• A planet Earth on the brink of biological extinction — developed during a rough 200 years 1800+.
SunLight
+ Leaf&Needle + 3Gy = Humans. Then 1800+ — after 200 years:
•
Dodge this:
•
year 2000+: a V8on5: concept of Nature has apparently lost its meaning;
WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..WeWantMore..
— Say it: You’re
wrong. Show. Give examples. Disclaim the depressing view. I wouln’t mind. Kill
Virus.
OceanREF: StillSearching
THE OCEANIC BIOLOGICAL
PART (HaBUn): Wikipedia (Biomass, Global biomass) mentions the ocean
biomass part on a rough (uncertain) 1-2% of the land related biomass. In this production
the uncertainty (max±1%) between the three independent (PrimDATA) encyclopedic references
from where all the (CWON) comparing BioEK1-10 quantities have been taken SO PRECISELY balances on a
corresponding (possible) oceanic biomass spouse. On that ground, the ocean
biomass part is implied as integrated with the quantitative results and parts
in this production — if nothing else turns up; It is (here) generally implied
that LIFE on Earth evolved (analogously) integrated on land (chlorophyll)
and in water (hematine). However taking the calculated MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 100% preserved nature forest and its land biomass
Leaf&Needle surface parts on their unfolded area (at least 8 flat Earth surface
areas) in any case marks the land based Leaf&Needle as the main
(100%) solar energy life up taking agent for all Earth life evolution and its
maintenance.
”Technology
companies have become governors of online space, and in turn, are shaping
freedom of expression around the world.”,
A spokesman in the article above — ”Eileen
Donahue, executive director of the Global Digital Policy Incubator at Stanford
University’s Center for Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law”,
took the words out of this domain:
”What
I worry about most is that we could be having a global, unconscious drift
toward digital authoritarianism.”, NAC2019ref
Yes. Definitely a DRIFT. But not ”could be”, as
seen here. Rather: Already Have. With further given examples in the following —
for proof. That has been exceptionally familiar here in UH a long time (2010+:
almost one new generation):
• it
is already at its full working capacity, and strongly expanding. THAT we also
did know already: Women always have a tendency of intuition in pinpointing the
path of the true nature of things:
• we
are not alone in sensing this: Society has lost its manifest. It is losing
ground, fast.
(Decisive shifts in culture always seem to
connect the Woman nature — rightfully: our Mother).
— Where does ”everybody knows” that? [ .. and that already
2019 .. ] — IS IT A HERE UNKNOWN FORUM FOR ALREADY ENLIGHTENED?
IMPLICATIONS exists ”our
new digital lives” in Swedish newspaper media. But never here known in any
(such) direct headlining addressing ”everybody knows”-way. Perhaps Sweden is
competing NoLandNews in getting to the point.:
— Nobody seems to care —
except crowds of individuals carrying handcuffed point-plates, stirring into
these constantly. And that is the only News we need to read The State of
Conditions on: society has lost its manifest.
No HumanRight mentioning.
Not one word. A world with no human right mentioning recognition.
Not one word.
Oblivion of a lost manifest called
humanity. Scattered. Divided. Homeless. Depressed. Pushed. Supervised. Tagged.
SwedON: OCEANref
SWEDEN — once a placid place — 2022 north to
south: even more heavy further reductions of original natural
forests. Sweden has lost is manifest.
THIS AUTHOR IS A NATIVE SWEDE — with growing
temper on witnessing the growing destruction of a former shockingly beautiful
landscape.
SWEDEN IS ENHANCING ITS GOVERNMENTAL CARE FOR BROADER
UNIVERSAL ANIMAL RIGHTS. MustBuyBook. Care More.
Sweden
2018+: no more Internet weather info — unless accepting cookies. Not one word HumanRight.
— Is
that the 2022 situation all over the world? (An increasing amount of previously
open Internet sites are now closed: previous information unavailable — unless
consenting cookies: Not one word HumanRight: cookies emperor-ship expands explosively — forcing
handcuffed point plate users to accept, unless locked out: where is world
jurisdiction?).
No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
A20.1 UDHR10Dec1948.
A19 UDHR10Dec1948:
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
A2 UDHR10Dec1948:
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this
Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.
Furthermore, no distinction
shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international
status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be
independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of
sovereignty.
— No longer any weather information access — and neither any else: police, court, government, health department ..?
Sweden: Microsoft&Google demand cookies acceptance from 4Nov2020 to access these — end even ones own e-mail domain.
— Where are the jurisdictional authorities? They don’t answer. The Police Department gives no response on the situation.
— »We are just Bitches to Microsoft&Google New World Business Enterprise, and there is nothing we can do». Say again.
• Not one word HumanRight.
People get scared .. but no one dares say against .. business ..
(P8
”constantly in mind”, ”every individual .. every organ”). Sweden has lost its
manifest. Most certainly clearly.
— And there is no instance on this planet we can turn to (Wish to be wrong): nobody is listening — yet.
RELATED: THERE ARE SOME CORNER STONES
But LET US TAKE IT FROM THE BEGINNING ..
following context
It is not the
fossil part of the story that shows the most — although that one is prominent
in itself. It is the reduction of the Leaf&Needle natural original life
power provision that pulls on the chain of commands: world health. We study
that.
StateAttacks ¦
RespondingNature ¦
Carbo — Statement ¦
WIND ¦ WhyMAC ¦
GeneralStateLaw ¦
DifferenceGRAPHS ¦
EnergyLAW ¦
CentralQuotes ¦
TheMAL ¦
TheBASIC ¦
PhysicsPROPERTY ¦
WhatModernAcademyCouldNeverExplain ¦
InertialSYSTEM ¦
CompareRelatedModernIDEA ¦
TheEINSTEINquote ¦
WindBasics ¦
ZeroINTEGRAL ¦
StateAttacks: GLOBAL WATCHERS
From
roughly around year 1800:
IGNORANT
STATE ATTACKS HUMANITY — state has lost its manifest ..
STATE ATTACKS HUMANS
By DRIFT. Not Plan. There is no
deliberate negative in any instance whatosoever. Just provable pure ignorance
in governing. We study that.
THE ABILITY OF EXPERIENCING AGITATION ON A BARE VIEW OF AN ONGOING RAPE OF NATURE: State has it not — but promotes it:
— Is not that space of mind ”.. endowed with reason and conscience ..” (A1 UDHR10Dec1948) inside Your nerve system: a natural marker saying: no?
200 years.
IF
the left side of the balance would be very close to the right side, the
appearance of a sudden surge of Insects would sure be a riddle, a practical
natural impossibility. Now, that we know how the balance look in a more precise
global quantity [ForestWORLD2012] there is little room for doubt that the Insect surges have
their perfect natural explanation: An original V8 prompted to run on 5 only:
infection comes.
• Sunlight + 100% Leaf&Needle = woman if nature is left alone for roughtly 3Gy. But on 70 — after a 200 year reduction? Apparently like a V8 on 5:
That engine will not work — on its original morphology. No pharmaceutical juice exists in compensation of lost life power; The State has lost its manifest.
SCENARIO:
Business Enterprise takes Tone — imagining
itself to stand above everything — instead of Organizing Every Available
Natural Resource for the benefit of all:
COOPERATION. Instead it gets greedy as
empty:
—
What is the snag? The idea of Ownership — over LIFE? It has taken itself rights
it definitely has not. It acts as if having powers it definitely has not.
It has become a dictating enterprise —
based on an increasingly corrupted legal jurisdictional ownership: copyright on
individual usability. Fascism:
• Not one word HumanRight. NOT A SLIGHTEST SIGN OF IT.
• The population is forced to join through governmental propaganda, and law — type Sweden — glorifying itself as a supreme democratic preference with high standard environmental responsibility. General Swedish Media — very poor opposition: invisible.
— The longer it works, the worse it becomes. Not one word HumanRight.
StateSwedenJoy: On a sudden chocking national rush 2012, as documented, trees in populated regions, close to roadsides, walk- and cycle paths were cut down in a massive attack: no warning, no information. Not one word. On an aftermath search for keywords inside Swedish governmental statements and reports, this was found: ”scaring vegetation”. Not one word HumanRight.
Even a doctor knows .. THAT
OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS SITES
IF THE PATIENT DOES NOT CEASE TO not only SCRATCH AND REOPEN THE WOUND but also to EXTEND THE WIDTH OF THE INFECTED SITE, ONLY ONE BOTTOM LINE COUNTS: A SAFE APPROACHING DEATH.
SWEDEN 2021 — south to north
Tree Emperors have arrived on Earth in Sweden —
decides the extent of killed vegetation to remain reduced: no natural regrowth
allowed
Ever since 2012, in periods or when needed, as seen by the visitor, the state administration frequently sends out workers to cut down what is trying to grow back. And so ever since 2012, here in Sweden with extending enterprise in local regions with still more original nature forest removed: Reduced natural amount of Leaf&Needle: That which during a rounf 3Gy collected the energy to build the human form — and all other life on Earth:
Responding
nature: OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS
SITES
Sweden: Detailed in ROAD-PICTURES 2015
• Sunlight + 100% Leaf&Needle as life developing agents made humans and all life on Earth: period 1800-2000 more than 30% is removed (ForestWORLD2012) — in Sweeden 50%? (we still have no safe data sources, yet, but visually see a growing reduction).
• Great Nature respect in Sweden. Very high IQ. Muzzled Handcuffed point plate 2018+. Not one word HumanRight. WindPower.
Still: Not one word HumanRight. No information. No communication. No explanation. Population begins to be treated as cattle on a market.
STATE-EDUCATED CRIMINALITY: it GUSHES out FROM The State: Not one word HumanRight:
— One of the workers, a team leader, was asked (2012): Why do you cut these trees? ”Someone can though hide behind!”. Sweden 2012:
Responding
nature: OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS
SITES
Sweden: Detailed in ROAD-PICTURES 2015
• State administration uses THE EFFECT OF its own inability to educate the population on human right recognition (P8) — meaning:
• state promotes growing intrusion, disrespect and criminality — to manifest a new kind of authority:
• associating alive Leaf&Needle species to be an accessory to the fast growing criminality: GOOD STATE.
• The State takes the role of a dictatorship, refusing to realize its own lack of human right responsibility AS THE in detail provable CAUSE:
• THE STATE BEGINS ATTACKING HUMAN RIGHT — certifying itself to yearn the opposite.
♦ The State begins Attacking NATURE. But it is completely blind to its own attacking action. So:
Responding nature: OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS
SITES
• Swedish Forest Communities expose an astounding IQ ability on fathoming cause and effect in existence. Short: 0. Apparently I’m afraid.
STATE COWARDLY HIDES OWN GUILT
BEHIND INSECTS — please do correct if wrong: Swedish defense on its Height ..
(TopGun ..)
STATE BLAMES INSECTS
— Still not one atom of self-criticism. Not one word. And still: Not one word HumanRight.
• The plot thickens. STATE CAUSES PERMANENTLY GROWING LIFE POWER REDUCTION — BLAMING INSECTS
• AND AN UNRELIABLE GENERAL NATURE for CAUSING THE WORLD POPULATIONS A PANDEMIC (2020+).
— Sane voices pointing in the right direction are refused — because ideaInterferes with the DRIVE ENGINE: profit interest.
• Business Enterprise — jurisdictional ownership: here a direct and obvious Trafficking Enterprise — kills all opposition;
• Business Enterprise — jurisdictional ownership: here a direct and obvious Trafficking Enterprise — takes no knowledge argument.
• Business Enterprise — jurisdictional ownership: here a direct and obvious Trafficking Enterprise — asks no knowledge argument.
• Business Enterprise — jurisdictional ownership: here a direct and obvious Trafficking Enterprise — seeks no knowledge argument.
• NOT because IT doesn’t WANT to, but because IT CAN NOT;
♦ Knowledge — human right — is an abstract to Business. It does not understand the concept.
BUSINESS ON THE LEVEL OF ADULTERY IS AN INFANT. It does not have the brains to work it out. Claim whatever you want.
Responding
nature: OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS
SITES
Sweden: Detailed in ROAD-PICTURES 2015
• The population is forced to join through governmental propaganda, and law — type Sweden — pacing its self glorification as a supreme democratic preference with high standard environmental responsibility. General Swedish Media — very poor opposition: invisible. Still June2022.
— The longer it works, the worse it becomes. Not one word HumanRight.
And again — note
for eliminating mistakes, as observed:
as long as The Responsible State Administration does not wake up and start recognizing HumanRight:
• by Drift. Not by plan.
• No HumanRight denier Thinks — intends — any
evil;
• HumanRight deniers just Perform Its Math.
Law it is.
— What means ”plain vector math”? Test answer:
— The Hammer. Simple physics — on detailed
math. Cause and Effect. Every atom.
STATE KILLS NATURE
Responding
nature: OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS SITES
INSECT ARMIES GROW
UniverseHistory tree death documentation in Sweden 2015+
(A General UH-report over more vast regions 2015+ in: FACIT)
FROM AROUND 2015 a UH-documentation began on a growing direct visual observation of tree death in Sweden — as also reported (2000+ at Internet) from other regions and locations around the globe (Dying Bonsai Pine ¦ WORLDreport2015).
IF
the left side of the balance would be very close to the right side, the
appearance of a sudden surge of Insects would sure be a riddle, a practical
natural impossibility. Now, that we know how the balance look in a more precise
global quantity [ForestWORLD2012] there is little room for doubt that the Insect surges have their
perfect natural explanation:
Responding nature: OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS
ATTRACT INFECTIOUS SITES
STATE-RESPONSE TO THE INSECT GROWTH
— SWEDEN (2021+) BEGINS TO kill even more trees REDUCE EVEN MORE ORIGINAL LEAF&NEEDLE as
STATE BLAMES INSECTS
— »If we remove these infected trees, the illness will disappear», Swedish Cultural Governmental Logics seems to state and say — with none yet such found formulation — however severely visualized (Jun2022):
• still more bald cuts: here — with further: whole mountain/hill ridges — light-brown-red Pine needles over a vast area
(MidSweden Jun2022):
• it is just lying there (Swedish bald cuts in general have no such look, as observed 2017+).
STATE BLAMES INSECTS — as a CAUSE to TreeDeath — caused by STATE denied
LIFE POWER REDUCTION:
— Who has the power to stop the madness enterprise from these obvious mind oblivion standard aces?
Might the question be:
— What has the power to stop the State Killing Nature madness enterprise?
TEST ANSWER:
• A level of Pandemic — transferring its account onto next level: Extinction .. ?
That is a real horrifying
suggestion — but the only one known here, if this presentation is just a little
more than garbage.
For sure 1: nobody wants that.
For sure 2: nobody knows how to stop that — unless this presentation has serious issues.
Next issue on our menu: ”carbon sink”, Sw, ”kolsänka”
Prev. Introd. State
attacks human right
TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE — RELATED
BASICS (TNED/UH
UniverseHistory): not to claim, only to explain
———————————————
Mathematics’ 5 Fundamentals ¦
Synthesis
of CheopsRectangle ¦
SymbolicAlgebraFundamentals
¦ NumbersAndPositions
¦ Trigonometry
¦ AllMathDocumentsInUH ¦
Light’s
Gravitational Dependency ¦ The
Potential Barrier ¦
Gravitation
Law Deduction ¦
Electric Charge Deduction ¦ Deducing The Planck Equivalents ¦ Physics’ 7 Principles ¦
Deducing The
Atomic Nucleus from Planck Constant: The Neutron ¦
Atomic Nucleus’
Gravitational Deduction ¦ Deducing The Periodic System ¦ Spectrum and Quantum Numbers ¦
Induction and Magnetism ¦
INDUCTION ¦ MAGNETISM
¦ The
ELECTRON ¦ The
Casimir Effect ¦
The
Polarization of LIGHT ¦ Neutron Fragmentation ¦
TNED from Beginning ¦
Earth’s
5 Equations with Sun’s 3 equations ¦ The K-cell Heat Physics ¦ The
K-cell Interior ¦
Gravitational
RedShift — ModernAcademy’s ”dark energy”¦
The
Neutron Square — atomic masses from atomic mass defects — outclassing modern academic nuclear
theory¦ DiffGRAPHS—
comparing results ¦ CWON
¦ The
MaunaLoaProof ¦
NOTES: The term CHEOPS RECTANGLE bd=h² (Details in CheopsATLAS in UH) was coined in this
early UH history. Tracing its geometrical use (Galileo Galileo) backwards, we
ended up in ancient scripts mentioning the Cheops Pyramid as their source, the
oldest known. In present mathematical literature the connection is more loosely
[hardly visible at all @Internet] known
as ”geometric medium” [Sw. BKL IV 1924sp1189].
As seen from The basic 5’s algebra, the simple
expression bd=h² contains and collects all the other basic 4 — with further:
•
The Pythagorean Theorem can be understood as (so) derived out of the
more simple and direct basic paragonic bd=h²: western math origin.
CarbonSINK: Carbo
THE STATE HAS STILL ANOTHER REASON FOR KILLING LIFE
SUSTAINING ALIVE CHLOROPHYLL AGENTS LEAF&NEEDLE:
(The Kyoto protocol — the historical »IPCC Global toxic alarm»).
STATEMENT follows
100% Leaf&Needle sunlight up-taking life-power-agents funds Earth life's maintenance and development — not 70 and decreasing
SWEDEN 2022 with associates
Photo: 16May2022 E2 Picture—4 ¦ Southern Mid Sweden — it just worsens ..
KOLSÄNKA — uppfattningen att såga träd för att låta nytt komma upp med föreställningen att ”eftersom träd tar växtkol ur luften” växet ska reducera fossil-CO2:et i luften — är enbart en meningsfras. Den har ingen som helst NATURVETENSKAPLIGT SAKLIGT REATERBAR kvantitativt bevisbar eller minsta påvisbar fysikaliskt mätande (Mauna Loa) grund: Absolut ytterst gärna rätta om fel. Tvärtom, / : MÄTNINGARNA (Mauna Loa) av atmosfärens CO2 är i ständigt exponentiellt växande. Inte minsta tillstymmelse till synbar nedgång eller minskning kan spåras eller ens antydas (Proof 1, Proof 2, Proof 3).
De svenska myndigheternas inrättningar lever i en kokong av
vanföreställningar 1800+:
• Allmän utförsäljning av också Jordkroppens biotopiska rotationsenergi.
• Befolkningen undanhålls naturkunskapen — av DRIFT. Inte plan. Notera det, noga.
Medan Fossilförbränningen CO2+ står för en i det närmaste LINJÄR ökning, eller till och med en viss minskning i kraft av typen (på senare tid ökad andel) vindkraft och solkraft (om än marginellt — men direkta bevis för det saknas här), ÄR DET TYDLIGT OCH HELT UPPENBART BORTOM VARJE FORM AV TVIVEL ATT det fortsatt växande avlivandet av levande Blad&Barr från ursprunglig naturskog — livskraftens solenergiupptagande agenter för allt Jordliv — HELT OCH HÅLLET BÄR ANSVARET FÖR en bevisbart EXPONENTIELL ökningstakt i atmosfäriskt CO2 — om ingen kan träda fram och bevisa eller påvisa ANNAT:
CHECK AND RECHECK THE DATA
SOURCES — these should be accurate enough
to certify the following proofs — by quantity
THERE IS NO ”CARBON SINK” — never was
DataSOURCE 18Jun2022: Updated Global Monitoring Laboratory Annual atmospheric CO2 carbon dioxide
MLF — MaunaLoaFunction see detailed description below in MLFexpl
y = 284 + (0.000000072)(Year–1812)3.99
M, actually measured atmospheric CO2 — data from Global Monitoring Laboratory, see their NOTE: Marginal differences may (and do) appear in the tables during the course of time. As these are marginal (compare prev. 2019), they make little or nothing to the general trend line.
1812 refers the last known (ForestWORLD2012) 100% preserved nature forest — the Leaf&Needle sunlight life power Agent for developing the human form and all other species during a rough 3Gy, up to last known preserved 1812:
MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ original life sustaining BIOsurfaceAREA
——————————————————————————————————————————————
——————————————————————————————————————————————
TabellMLa AM2012b.ods ¦ The MLF reliability
UR den Redan
Exponentiella MaunaLoaFunktionen framgår tydligt att CO2-ökningen växer
Ytterligare — högra tabellkolumnen, den blå trendlinjen.
• Fossilförbränningens bidrag till den
atmosfäriska CO2-ökningen har ingen allmänt generellt exponentiellt växande
fysisk natur (SDt).
• Enda återstående kandidat: fortsatt växande
avlivning av levande solenergiupptagande livskraftsunderhållande Blad&Barr
som dumpas på luften genom förmultning och förbränning (runt och grovt 50% av
trädets torrkolvikt: klorofyllagenter med tillhörande grenverk: allt utom
trädets råstam).
WhatPush: Intro
WHAT PUSHES THE TREND
RISE?
The
World’s »BioTechnical» Situation Worsens
—
on continued deforestation, not fossil
As Related:
THE SITUATION KEEPS
GETTING WORSE — the Mauna Loa measured annual values (GML) cleary exposes a
rise in exponential growth (blue trend line above right from OpenOffice Graph)
— ON the already exponential Mauna Loa Function:
• The atmospheric Fossil CO2 ackumulation has
no such physical property :
• the Logistic Growth Equation: humanity’s energy (fossil based) consumption approaches a
linear usage — a constant ackumulation of added CO2 — not an exponential
(steady Growing Growth);
• Only one known remaining candidate exists
with a capability of adding atmospheric CO2: deforestation (human constructed wild fire results without fire
just killing alive forest in growing pace):
• the exponential CO2 growth capacity has
only a continuing reduced original 100% natural forest Leaf&Needle to rely
on:
• growing reduction of original 100%
Leaf&Needle, the Earth life’s sunlight up taking life power agents.
• The IDEA of a ”carbon sink” is — so hence
proved by measures — a detailed provable MYTH (Proof1 below) — developed from a first (1958) apparent and provable misunderstanding
of the Mauna Loa Keeling kurve SD and WI variations:
• SD is a constant (See comparing Related
Photosynthesis in detail):
• Earth ground mass vegetation takes not one
atom for growth from atmosphere. No way;
• There is no ”carbon sink”. Never was. Never
will be. The situation just worsens when ”UN tries to repair — on Business
ideas”:
MaunaLoaFunction,
explained: WhatPUSH
MLF — MaunaLoaFunction y = 284 + (0.000000072)(Year–1812)3.99
————————————————————————————————————
Not included in modern quarters
due to the ”carbon sink” issue — nobody cares to investigate
————————————————————————————————————
284 as extracted from the Mauna Loa Norm on a latest known (ForestWORLD2012) 100% naturally preserved nature forest: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2
The MLF (orange data points) is an Evaluated (2015) here in Universe History exponential graphical function versus measured Mauna Loa data values (blue data points) into an averaged precision of100.00% taken over the entire period 1958-2013.
— Mauna Loa values after 2013 (2015+) show increasing divergence, exposing further rise in the exponential curve math.
— WE then use the 1958-2013 MLF part as a preference in comparing further Mauna Loa measures — then knowing whether these are OnTheUp (it gets even worse: the exponential growth increases: declare global toxic alarm) or OnTheDown
(”I see light ahead”: the exponential growth decreases: Planet Earth’s biotopic nature is on a healing path):
None yet found Jun2022 — see graphs above/below.
Consulted for comparing annually reported Mauna Loa CO2-values in excamining eventual decreasing — or increasing — trends.
• As seen: The MLF exponential graph is superseeded by an apparent exponential additional growth — as of yet Jun2022 with no sign of a ”carbon sinking property or measure”.
TabellMLa AM2012b.ods
¦ The MLF reliability — straight blue = trend line in
OpenOffice Spread Sheet program
All collected M Mauna Loa atmospheric CO2 added
annual values from 1959 relative the 100% line’s MLF exponential
index-increase -preference for comparing tests
The proof in
complete relies 100% on the fossil energy curve function (AGW-proof
2015) — smoothed industrial statistics on humanity’s energy
usage: its end station LINEAR = constant addition of atmospheric CO2 — as
opposed to the apparently exponential increasing reduction of the original
nature forest (ForestWORLD2012
¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2)
— while UN/IPCC worsens the situation in claiming (Kyoto protocol) that removing even more
nature forest ”reduces the fossil added CO2 in our atmosphere”. In other words:
UN/IPCC is not aware of promoting an accelerating biological catastrophe — if
this stated result cannot be disclaimed and disproved:
• Deforestation kills life on Earth.
• The Fossil Curve has been extensively
mathematically tested in AGW Universe History articles: The Power Function — the global statistically
smoothed fossil energy usage function’s derivative, Deductions AGW3 ¦ The
Power-function’s Top Value — with the given preferences it
is found to have be passed 4th April 2002 (with some marginal ± tail) — with a
(95%) saturated roof of human
technological development on some year epoch around 2500 — The Sea Periods . In short: The Fossil generated atmospheric CO2 has no
nature of generating a physical signature of an exponential CO2 rise, only a
linear (asymptotic) one (which theoretically was launched 4 April 2002).
— Note that the
actual Fossil CO2 accumulation — the energy usage integral — apparently demands
a numerical solution (see Energy Integral
Function Analysis). The Fossil curve above is a limited most
close fit on an exponential basis. See The
Numerical Integral Solutions.
GlobalWATCHERS: MaunaLoaFunction
WHAT PUSHES THE TREND RISE?
Internet site THE WORLD COUNTS has a COUNTER (19Jun2022 15:43 Sweden ¦ theworldcounts.com/challanges/planet-earth/forests..):
12,997,15n.nn and counting hectares
Hectares of forests cut down or burned in 2022 — with the n-part adding one ha hectare unit per second: 1ha = (100M)² = 10 000 M².
”Earth’s forests are being cut down. And they are being cut down fast.”. 1ha ~ one football field. Per second. Really. HighTechMachinery.
— The site reports a counting on the present estimates on the remaining time left until ”the end” of rainforests; now 19Jun2022: 77y 194d.
Internet site GLOBAL FOREST WATCH (globalforestwatch.org/dashboards/global/..) has more extensive and detailed graphics on the continuing loss of original forest — as above: the loss rate is tremendous:
2022News
THIS IS HOW THE AMAZINGLY PRESENT FANTASTIC WORLD-BUSINESS-SHOW RENDERS AT THE SWEDISH SITE:
ALL World Business Enterprise. This is how it looks in Sweden (sampled at site documentations May-Jun2022 ¦ once a placid place ..):
Documents from SWEDEN — early summer 2022 — apparently last decade »expanding universal business» — and still increasing:
This author’s
native home in universe — it is such a shame — once upon a time so Beautiful ..
My HOME is Raped .. Mayday .. Mayday ..
WORLD BUSINESS ENTERPRISE RULES HUMANITY (A4). Not knowledge. Where in the world is Jurisdiction on HumanRight? Answer: These special aces appear as bitches to the Enterprise — securing its proceeding by law. Please do correct if wrong (a highly spontaneous reflexion arises ..).
• World Jurisdiction Business Bitches — a new special form of very fine democratic World Slavery Reinstated (2010+). Have your say.
Criminality gushes .. not one word HumanRight
.. SWEDEN IS ENHANCING GOVERNMENTAL JURISDICTIONAL
ANIMAL CARE ..
Very popular public engagement .. not one sound. .. sports news .. Denmark won over Alaska again ..
The bald cuts occasionally lie no more than a tight half kilometer apart: we would need hundreds of photos to »show them all» on a 100 KM path.
— We believed the bald-cut feasting reached its final top some 2018. Oh no. The following years it apparently extended with even more violated origin.
(A4) THE POPULATION IS NATIONALLY FORCED TO TAKE PART AND SUSTAIN THE ENTERPRISE — BY LAW .. prohibited protest.
— We can protest, yes. Of course. But who cares? The enterprise just keeps moving on with a steady rise in pace supported and protected by national police, jurisdictional providence and national courts: rightful ownership — of universal domains. Not one word HumanRight. Come again:
”.. endowed with reason and conscience ..”. Say again. Come again. Very Interesting Resolution. What was it you said about ownership? Come again.
EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS HAS DECIDED THE ENTERPRISE MUST NOT BE INTERPRETED AS SLAVERY ..
• Jurisdictional Ownership
Authority Decisions decide/dictates the forms of public/media thinking:
PROTEST IS ALLOWED, YES. BUT THE STATE ADMINISTRATION AND POLICE and JURISDICTION GIVES A SHIT.
— You’re NOT a majority.
— An who said I would have to?
• See also a more extensive Swedish deforestation documentation 2015+ in FACIT;
• Sweden (Media) blames tree death on insects:
— That must be the reason why we die: first the insects come. Then we die. Jepp. Sweden (2010+): leading world authority on wit.
— When will we ever see any light on this specifically
2010+ dark age?
— Soon. It better.
Statement: INTRODUCTION
As already revealed in The Mauna Loa Proof (MLP ¦ UHFeb2017), further certified and attested in CWON — none of these are even allowed in modern academy teaching system — if so allowed: moden academy teaching system crashes:
Statement:
The present idea of Leaf&Needle as an atmospheric ”carbon sink” (intended for reducing atmospheric fossil dumped CO2)
is by detail a provable misapprehension, a misunderstanding — an invention — inside modern academic general consensus theory.
• It has taken dimension of a cultural delusion transformed to a public MYTH — directly connecting to general academic cosmology theory:
• The Kant/Laplace nebular hypothesis with its later following planetesimal theory: how Earth came about.
• And further with results from established academic Sun theory (»too hot to allow primary Earth surface water»):
• An accompanying idea of ”water came
from the outer” was so invented to Match the Stick;
This Complex has created an evil spiral of human enterprise (type Kyoto protocol ¦ IPCC Global Toxic Alarm)
• responsible for a growing global biological reduction of life power: increasing reduction of the original 100% natural Leaf&Needle solar energy life sustaining biosurface: Modern Academy, if not stopped, is about to KILL nature, humanity and Biology — by DRIFT;
PROOF 1:
Many of us humans have already noticed the steady annual report of still growing atmospheric CO2-content.
• As yet (Jun2022), what we know, no sign is visible of a decrease in the atmospheric exponential CO2-increase.
• So: where Sink? I don’t see any. Do you?
There is nothing such as a ”carbon sink”:
— Never was. Never will be. Disclaim that by scientific argumentation, the one who can. Searched for. None yet found.
THIS FOLLOWING QUOTE EXPLAINS THE BEGINNING OF THE MISAPPREHENSION, by direct quote:
• The Academically thoroughly
established detailed provable misapprehension:
Keeling on Mauna
Loa first observations 1958+:
Keeling on Mauna Loa
first observations 1958+.
THE IDEA THAT PLANTS SUCKS AIRY CARBON — Never was. Never will be. Details in 100% RELATED PHOTO SYNTHESIS:
comparing related with established. Preview: 1800+ academic use of an already existent content of natural intelligence.
• Data values from available
tables: Mauna Loa values take exponential growth — ca 1962+
———————————————
Kurvanalysen — Curve Analysis¦
Comparing
available Mauna Loa data values 1958+ show that atmospheric extra CO2 has
increased exponentially from close year 1962 [World Trade Statistics]. First
unnoticeable, then with growing exponential pace. The annual CO2 increase is
pushed on the [WI] Winter Increase during Sep-May.
• Data values from available
tables:
———————————————
SDref ¦ Keeling Curve ¦ PhotoSynthesis
REASON:
• Fossil combustion (carbon, oil, gas) cannot develop an exponential nature of growth-INCREASE of CO2+.
Why is that, What’sUp?
THE UNIVERSAL LOGISTIC GROWTH EQUATION: Humanity’s
energy consumption approaches a linear (asymptotic) roof
1800
..................................................................................................... 2500
The main energy source —
fossil fuel — has no exponential nature to approach to: So: Where Exponential
CO2+?
• Only one remaining candidate exists: reduction of nature’s original Leaf&Needle: exploding deforestation.
• As more original Leaf&Needle are killed alive, their normal carbonic cycling is killed and dumped into the atmosphere as growing CO2.
• It works as if resulted from a never ending wild fire: never allowing a natural regrowth: constantly increasing the waste.
Detailed:
• __ / ¯¯: Humanity’s energy use follows the same route and principle as a collection of fish fry let into a pond: __: Earth as a limited resource: Growth Humanity’s corresponding energy useage is governed via an annual fossil combustion maximum: /: World trade doubled (seven times) during 1945-1975 through a surge of technological development on shipping, metallurgy, semi-conductor technology, engineering industry. It then decreases and approaches a top roof value as the main technology developing pace saturates: ¯¯ . Exemplified.
• The collection of measured values (1958+) shows that atmospheric extra CO2 has increased exponentially from ca 1962.
As significant atmospheric CO2+ — what we know — only has two candidates, 1. fossil and 2. reduced original Leaf&Needle, the bottom result line leaves only one party to call on: deforestation. Continued increasing loss of original biological life power.
IF
the left side of the balance would be very close to the right side, the
appearance of a sudden surge of Insects would sure be a riddle, a practical
natural impossibility. Now, that we know how the balance look in a more precise
global quantity [ForestWORLD2012] there is little room for doubt that the Insect surges have
their perfect natural explanation:
OPEN BLEEDING WOUNDS ATTRACT INFECTIOUS SITES
2022: Atmospheric CO2 steadily
increases — no reports yet of any reduced pace trend in the exponential growth
There is nothing such as a ”carbon sink”:
Never was. Never will be. And
there is no scientific argumentation against that conclusion: please share.
PROOF 2: P1
NOTING IS ADDED — NOTING IS REMOVED — 100% CYCLIC ON A FIXED AMOUNT OF MASS
RELATED detailed PHOTOSYNTHESIS
PHOTOSYNTHESIS related — 100%related CYCLIC NET TURNOVER — compare established:
• in6(CO2 +
H2O) = 6(CH2O3) ¦
GLUCOSE = sugar = starch, cellulose, same components in different form
= 6C + 12H + 18O = builtGLUKOS(6C+5H2O) + ut(5O2+H2O) + in(CO2 + 5C+4H2O):
PhotoSynth: PROOF2
PHOTOSYNTHESIS related — compare established:
———————————————
PhotoSynthesis ¦ Nature related Photosynthesis ¦ Complete GROW-DECAY PHOTOCYCLE ¦ OnFIRE ¦ TheComplete
MODERN ACADEMY apparently HAS NO NaturePICTURE OF THE EYE — IS BLIND TO NATURE as seen by eye: 0 heart.
— How can you say such a
thing? Because: IF it wasn’t, this was never written.
• What does it look like: like modern academy
takes care — in what? Say. Give an example.
Further detailed below.
IPCC-community versus Related Physics:
•
plants do produce oxygen
•
plants do take carbon for growth from atmosphere
• plants
do dissolve water
•
plants do not produce oxygen
•
plants do not take carbon for growth from atmosphere
•
plants do not dissolve water
• Exact same
mathematical/chemical rank, same chemical components, same analysis and same
synthesis.
— Completely different world systems. Every atom. 100%. Modern Academy has not the Mauna Loa Proof ¦ MLP.
— And if it WOULD, the modern academy entire cosmological theoretical system WOULD crash. 100%.
• That is the Why of it. Modern Academy 1800+ Invented a Nature — suited to its own idea of supreme intelligence.
Many saw that. But without decisive proofs: nada.
DRIFT:
So — in a short partial summation — on the academic idea that plants dissolve water and produce atmospheric oxygen:
Open QUESTION (to Modern Academy in general) —
please share and clarify:
»..
NobelPrice in Experimentation» .. ?
REFERENCES: See all (”PSII” [Chlorophyll a])-details in Reference Excerpt (Koriodov2014) and Wikipedia Oxygenic Photosynthesis:
”PSII is the only natural pigment-protein complex known to oxidize water and release molecular oxygen.”;
”Photosynthesis is largely responsible for producing and maintaining the oxygen content of the Earth’s atmosphere, ..”,
WIKIPEDIA [12Jun2022], Photosynthesis
Core:
• IF the plant — extract under electron microscope — is robbed its MaunaLoaSDtransporter (the cyclic circulating O2: apparently totally unknown in modern corridors as above): What THEN is the responding effect to be expected in the plant’s cell chlorophyll based light reactivity — on applied (X-ray) spectroscopic hf-quanta — OTHER than THAT the plant — so safely killed by the experimental circumstance — forcedly is forced as no other Agent exists due to The KillNatureExperimentalEvent — must take out a corresponding ”hf-Corrupted” (as if still alive) O2 out of the experiment’s WATER (namely two, 2, such : 2H2O). The provability of the argumentation above apparently excludes all other possibilities. That is: The proof holds — or this statement section has flaws, not known here.
— Say. Do tell.
• There is nothing wrong with the experiment as such. The crunch is the constant MaunaLoaSDPart apparently unknown in MAC:
• Same ranks (IPCC/TNED). Different world systems:
MAC crashes 100%:
•
plants do not produce oxygen
•
plants do not take carbon for growth from atmosphere
• plants do not dissolve water
• : BECAUSE built on the Kant Nebulae hypothesis — further on »creation of the Planck constant h=mcr = Neutron out of Nothing called a Relativistic Singularity» (Stephen Hawking’s terminology) — further based on the invented idea that cosmic existence has (consensus again 1800+) a limited mass — although every experimentalist knows that energy (EnergyLAW ¦ Energy Law Related) can neither be created, nor be destroyed, only converted:
• the idea of an origin of m in E = hf = mcr/t = mc² has no conclusive logical or rational foundation: wherever we look, there is always more mass behind.
• And so a corresponding gravitational energy algebra certifies a cyclic central Universal Cell: in TNED the K-cell Heat Physics: General State Law.
• The general ranks we find in
established literature on the subject photosynthesis — proof reference:
THE RELATED ALTERNATIVE — try deduce life chemistry without killing its own nature :
• Nothing is added = Nothing is removed. Same universal principle as the energy law.
• Atmospheric oxygen and plant cyclic oxygen (BioEK1) are two separate physical systems, also appearing in different geological time (VoJ);
• The cosmological timescale (VoJ) lies totally outside modern academic fathoming — see especially Explaining The Moon Recession.
• in6(CO2 + H2O) → build[Glucose(6C + 5H2O) = C6H10O5] + UT(5O2 + H2O) + O2 + in(5C + 4H2O).
GroundBioMass
Decay adds its cyclic Carbon with a remaining padding (CARBONIC ACID + WATER + METHANE):
CYCLIC
DecayGROUNDaddition’s MOLECULAR/ATOMIC EQUIVALENT:
5C + 4H2O = 5C + 4H2 + 4O = O + 5C + 4H2 + 3O = H2 + O + 5C + 3H2 + O3 = CH2O3 + O + 4C + 3H2
= CH2O3 + H2O + 4C + 2H2
= CH2O3 + H2O + 4C + H4
= CH2O3 + H2O + 4CH4 = CarbonicAcid + Water + Methane
on MaunaLoaSD-TRANSPORTER’S DELIVERY via The SDtransportCompany O2 — repeatedly via its water solution — no SD-loss, no SD-gain — along with 1 ground up taking cyclic plant carbon atom (C) giving 1 extra carbon acid molecule:
O2 + CIRCULATINGgroundC + 1H2O = 1CH2O3 taken up by the ground biomass’ plant roots, with the above 5C + 4H2O:
• It all
works as a 100% closed cyclic solid autonomous biologic »eternalSystem» — on a fixed
biomass ($=S+c+MLN)CO2
— HOW, then,
• is the fossil carbon explained?
• is the atmospheric and biomass oxygen
explained?
• is Earth as such explained, at all?
———————————————
DEFINITELY NOT BY
CONSENSUS:
We will return to that in
Proof
3 with a full explaining
answer: fully related natural mathematics and physics.
• alive
vegetation does not produce — accumulate — oxygen (VoJ)
• alive
vegetation does not take growth-carbon from atmosphere (MaunaLoaProof)
• alive
vegetation does not dissolve water
The reader can see
the picture? Invention. Not deduction. Consensus. Not Science.
• Modern academy idea of Earth from
planetesimals — and a primary so hot Sun as no Earth surface water possibly
could have remained — DEMANDS an oxygen explanation: After first imperative
invention ”water came
from the outer”:
• The only modern academic intelligible
candidate becomes: plants.
• Then 1800+ an Industry of experimentation
arises to Build That type of cosmology.
• — »Killing and stressing the plant
sufficiently, makes it capitulate, beginning to dance as we dictate». Is there
anything else?
• Modern Academy 1800+: State
ASdministration: Jurisdictional Authority.
IF
the left side of the balance would be very close to the right side, the
appearance of a sudden surge of Insects would sure be a riddle, a practical
natural impossibility. Now, that we know how the balance look in a more precise
global quantity [ForestWORLD2012] there is little room for doubt that the Insect surges have
their perfect natural explanation:
CWON — complete whole number solution — AR123 — BioEK1-10 : TheTEN
EARTH PHYSICS APPEAR (UH2020) WITH ITS OWN QUANTITIES, PROVING A HAMONIOUS COMPOSITION OF ISOTOPIC DISTRIBUTION BY ELEMENTS (data collected from the 1900s three independent encyclopedic productions) IN EARTH’S AtmosBiosLitos DIRECTLY CONNECTING EARTH’S OWN TOTAL MASS:
• water + biomass. That Complex, provable in to the last atom, apparently lies totally outside modern academic thinking and ideation.
PROOF 3 APPARENTLY CERTIFIES, VERIFIES AND CONTAINS ALL OTHER PROVABLE ITEMS IN THIS BIO-COSMICAL COMPLEX.
HOWCOME IT IS COMPLETELY UNKNOWN IN MODERN QUARTERS?
Modern Academy (1800+) cannot handle physics. No way — illustrated.
Related photosynthesis in more
detail:
Note the modern academic approach
— killing life in order to examine its »inner structure and workings»: It
contains vast amounts of specific chemical ranks describing the different
molecular aspects — with corresponding experimental proofs. That is NOT our
table, here. We only seek (and find, if at all) a most general overview — if
any at all — possibly containing all the basic answers on a general panoramic
view. As above.
PHOTOSYNTESISout(5C+H2O) + circulatingGrowDecay(5C + 4H2O) + SDtransported(CH2[O3=SDO2+O])
TransportCompany
SDO2 only transports the article to
OpenStore24/7, but partakes never itself with any customer’s mass
+ GroundPart’sPaddingRest(1H2O + 1GroundCyclicGrowsthCarbonAtomC):
= C6H12O18
= 6(CO2 + H2O) .. over and over and over again,
endlessly CO2 → C + O2
→ CO2 — as long
as the Sun shines ..
RELATED NATURE
PHYSICS: mCSDO2 + H2O
→ CH2O + O2 ......... deduced
MODERN
ACADEMIC / IPCC: mCSDO2 + H2O → CH2O
+ O2 ......... invented 1800+
•
PLANTS produce oxygen •
PLANTS take their growth carbon
from atmosphere • PLANTS dissolve
water
• Exact same math rank, same
chemical components, same analysis and synthesis.
— Completely different world systems. There is no — what we know — relatable common foundation.
• MaunaLoaSummerDecrease’s (SD-wheel) CO2 works as an electrolythical GrowsthChemical katalyst:
• It only transports ground carbon’s cyclic physical path root→Leaf&Needle, but never itself adds mass to the built:
constant($=StandingS+Cyclicc+MaunaLoaMLN)CO2 — MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2
Natural climate variations are
— they better be — incorporated, see NASAgraph.
• Same amount SD(CO2) is returned always cyclic constant (Sep-May) after each growth period (May-Sep).
• NatureForests’s reference with 100% preserved nature forest: MLN1812IPCC2013Graf284ppmvCO2. So:
— MODERN ESTABLISHED ACADEMY repressed NATURAL BIOCHEMISTRY — for claiming its own.
• Anyone can formulate a private headline to this apparent 100% exhaustive mathematical-physical description.
— What about the recently mentioned fossil
carbon issue: if not from plants, then from where?
PETROLEUM ORIGIN ¦ PRIMARY
BIOCHEMICAL MATRICES — meteorite material proves the same cosmological building
principle for all primary celestial bodies ¦
• Once the reader »gets the picture» the
Quest of The Petroleum Origin pushes itself back to the early 1800 and 1900s
theories of its origin:
• geological processes (pressure and heat through long periods of time from
basic non organic carbon-mineral deposits) — from more advanced
geological premises than the present known CAN explain the physical origin.
Compare the different forms of carbon: amorphous (dust, soot), graphite (thin
layers) and diamond — all (now) gallantly explained together with the already
verified type meteorite findings: amino acids, pollen and others (also diamonds
in Siderit meteorites).
• TNED calculations show (CWON) that the
present consumed petroleum mass from 1800+ may very well have an additional
double or triple that amount in Earth’s lithosphere, without crashing the
overall CWON isotopic equivalents account. Possibly.
———————————————
CarboLINKS ¦ CWON ¦ The incompressibility of the atomic nucleus: The never
created Neutron = Planck Constant h =
mcr — mass, spin and gravity circle radius:
•
Kepler momentum [K = vr] times mass: The
Periodic System — resonances.
RELATED: Same principal biological natural standpoint as in the one from Senebiers experiment 1796:
alive plants take not growth-carbon out of the atmosphere. But here more cultivated from (MLP) MaunaLoaProof (Feb2017), with some further provability in PHOTOSYNTESIS RELATED;
in6(CO2 + H2O) = 6C + 12H + 18O = byggeGLUKOS(6C+5H2O) + ut(5O2+H2O) + in(CO2 + 5C+4H2O):
RELATERAD
NATURFYSIK: .......... mCSDO2 + H2O
→ CH2O + O2 .......... härledd
• levande växter producerar inte syre • levande växter tar inte växtkol ur luften • levande växter sönderdelar inte vatten
——————————————————————————————————————————
MODERN
AKADEMI/IPCC: ............ mCSDO2 + H2O → CH2O
+ O2 .......... uppfunnen 1800+
•
växter producerar syre •
växter tar växtkol ur luften • växter
sönderdelar vatten
• Exakt samma matematikled,
samma kemikomponenter, samma analys och syntes.
— Helt väsensskilda världssystem. Det finns ingen relaterbar beröringspunkt: MLB utraderar den.
Den moderna akademins (1800+) föreställning om ”växter tar sitt växtkol ur luften” — upprinnelse (1958+):
Keeling on Mauna
Loa first observations 1958+:
’
Keeling on Mauna
Loa first observations 1958+.
RecountCheck — 100% cyclic nature
related photosynthesis
• NatureForest reference on 100% preserved cyclic 
Leaf&Needle MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 — AR123:
in:
6(CO2 + H2O) =
1 buildGLUCOSE[(6C+5H2O) = C + (5C + 5H2O) = CO2
+ 5(C + H2O)] +
ExpiringProductLeaf&Needle
2 Leaf&Needleut[(5O2 + H2O)] + Number3Below is not included in MAC
: The MaunaLoaProof:
there is a natural forest
3 CYCLICMaunaLoaTransporterSDut[SDO2 = TransportAgency for 1 groundCarbonAtom] +
groundCyclicDecayed
4 In[(5C + 4H2O)] +
RestPaddingGroundPart
5 In[(1H2O + 1groundCyclicGrowthCarbonAtomC)
= C + H2O]:
3+5 SDO2 + CYCLICgroundC + H2O = CO2 + H2O = CH2O3 ............ = 1CARBONIC ACID
2+4 (5O2 + H2O) + (5C + 4H2O) = 5(CO2 + H2O) ..................................... = 5CARBONIC ACID
2+4 + 3+5 5(CO2 + H2O) + 1(CO2 + H2O)
= 6(CO2 + H2O) ........................................................................................ = verified
MaunaLoaSDoxygenPairO2 transport repeatedly endlessly one new ground carbon bound growth carbon atom (mC) for each C-oxygen binding with one ground carbon atom (O2 + C). With water added, one carbonic acid molecule is formed (CH2O3). It is taken up by the plant via its roots (Senebier 1796) along with the genneral nourishing xylem pumping water.
• Nothing is added = Nothing is removed. Same univeral principle counts for the energy law.
So — again, in a short partial summation — on the academic idea that plants dissolve water and produce atmospheric oxygen:
Open QUESTION (to Modern Academy in general) —
please share and clarify:
»..
NobelPrice in Experimentation» .. ?
REFERENCES: See all (”PSII” [Chlorophyll a])-details in Reference Excerpt (Koriodov2014) and Wikipedia Oxygenic Photosynthesis:
”PSII is the only natural pigment-protein complex known to oxidize water and release molecular oxygen.”;
”Photosynthesis is largely responsible for producing and maintaining the oxygen content of the Earth’s atmosphere, ..”,
WIKIPEDIA [12Jun2022], Photosynthesis
Core:
• IF the plant — extract under electron microscope — is robbed its MaunaLoaSDtransporter (the cyclic circulating O2: apparently totally unknown in modern corridors as above): What THEN is the responding effect to be expected in the plant’s cell chlorophyll based light reactivity — on applied (X-ray) spectroscopic hf-quanta — OTHER than THAT the plant — so safely killed by the experimental circumstance — forcedly is forced as no other Agent exists due to The KillNatureExperimentalEvent — must take out a corresponding ”hf-Corrupted” (as if still alive) O2 out of the experiment’s WATER (namely two, 2, such : 2H2O). The provability of the argumentation above apparently excludes all other possibilities. That is: The proof holds — or this statement section has flaws, not known here.
— Say. Do tell.
• There is nothing wrong with the experiment as such.
The crunch points to a DRIFT of a dictated DISCRIMINATION — apparently unknown — in modern quarters:
• The CONDITIONS for a plant to BE a plant alive is apparently less familiar inside the modern academic quarters:
THE
ABILITY OF EXPERIENCING AGITATION ON A BARE VIEW OF AN ONGOING RAPE OF NATURE:
State has it not — but promotes it:
— Is
not that space of mind ”.. endowed with reason and conscience ..” (A1
UDHR10Dec1948) inside Your nerve system: a natural marker saying: no?
— Is
there no nerve inside the You telling: THIS IS WRONG?
What replaces the
reduction of the previous existent sunlight energy up taking and sustaining
life power, Leaf&Needle?
— The eye meets the sight
of a catastrophe. A highly depressing sight. Resemblance: a constructed heavy
wild fire result.
• The actual natural premises inside the chemistry of life seems unknown in modern quarters. Very.
— Hence the interpretation — but not the result — becomes corrupted:
• Modern academy is — by DRIFT, not by any plan, of course not — as this presentation underlines repeatedly holding humanity locked inside a dark cave with delusive, misapprehended, constructed and academic consenting paradigms pushed onto an ignorant humanity — with an increasing trend to approach 0 natural connection.
The crunch is the constant MaunaLoaSDPart apparently unknown in MAC:
• Same ranks (IPCC/TNED). Different world systems:
MAC crashes 100%:
•
plants do not produce oxygen
•
plants do not take carbon for growth from atmosphere
•
plants do not dissolve water
Summation
Beginning from (The Planck Ring angular momentum) THE NEUTRON = Planck constant h=mcr = Km = Kepler mass momentum
• the building of a universe begins after a previous (K-cell expansion ¦ K-cell half period) contractive phase (The critical density of the Universe ¦ The Milky-Way-Andromeda Test) from a maximum neutron density state (Dmax in TNED = 1.82 T17 KG/M³), based on
• The Neutron as an Incompressible fundamental form of Gravitation (Atomic Nucleus’ Gravitational Deduction)
• LIGHT’S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY
• these explain in the most atomic possible detail a cyclic pulsing central Universal K-cell Heat Physics in a larger neutron mass unlimited c0-body governed and mathematically fully explained by light’s gravitational dependency (Gravitational Redshift — not applied as such of an entire Universe in MAC, only on local larger masses — our present time established modern academy invented ”dark energy”);
• See further from GALAXY FORMATION and Solar Systems in Milky Way
— it is all based and apparently founded mathematically (Planck constant) on THE FUSION LIMIT MASS — explaining the different groups of celestial bodies; planets, stars, stone and gaseous bodies — governed by THE EXOTHERMAL NUCLEAR REACTION LAW:
— The inner distribution of celestial elements (The DiaSQUARE).
All articles are collected in UH (UniverseHistory — at Internet from Aug2008) with links, references, quotes, comparisons, examples and analyzing tests, where so has been found possible — in all known scientific branches mentioning any here known foremost quests in physics and mathematics so that we have good comparing preferences.
WIND: 30Jun2022 — WindPowerOnEarth ¦ WindFromSunArgument ¦ WindFromRotationArgument ¦ General ¦ WindPower ¦ THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBNRIUM ¦ EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS ¦ RadiationBasics ¦
BasicWindReference ¦ WindMassCalculation ¦ BasicWindStructure ¦ ComparingResults ¦ WindProof ¦ AllMathPHYSICS ¦ COOLING ¦ PopularObjection ¦ GroundWindSpeeds ¦ WINDVortexPhysics ¦
CentrifugalBASIC ¦ COR2 ¦ CentralQuotes ¦ TheMAL ¦ TheBaseCoriolisAnalogies ¦ RelatedPhysics ¦ TheBASIC ¦ PhysicsPROPERTY ¦ PREFIXxSIN
¦ WHACNE ¦ CompareRelatedModernIDEA ¦ WindBasics ¦
InternetQuotes24Jun2022 ¦ StanfordRef ¦ WindOnEARTH ¦ Independent ¦ WindSpeeds
¦ SomeAfterMATH ¦ TCE ¦ Archer2012Ref ¦ WINDmass ¦ VindbegreppetRelaterat ¦ CoriolisMaximum ¦ ModernAkademi ¦
MAbakgrund ¦ TheMock ¦ TP ¦ BioSURFtext ¦ SummingUP ¦ BioSURFACEarea ¦ CoriolisTwoTheorems
¦ Acceleration ¦ ZeroINTEGRAL ¦ CalCard ¦ Content ¦
General ¦ WindOnEarth ¦ WIND ¦ THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM ¦
WIND — compare Q1
ASPECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT — ANALYZING A MALFUNCTION BEFORE REPAIR IS IMPERATIVE:
As shown in the following short overview — disclaim it anyone who can:
———————————————
PREFIXxSIN ¦
WindSPEEDS
¦ WindProof ¦ AllMathPHYSICS ¦ Archer2012 ¦ WINDVortexPhysics
All the 2022 @Internet most
visible established texts claim the same type version: “Wind energy on Earth is
generated by the Sun” (SEM). — But where do we find a simple,
detailed, and persuasive mathematical explanation on the Sun's physical credit?
Searched for. Non yet found. In fact no direct ”Sun Equations” are even mentioned,
unless we have missed something imperative. The only repeated argument is quite
qualitative and of the typical form: “Sun heats different parts of the Earth
differently, which generates wind”. There is no here known established claim of
Earth's rotation as a wind energy source. — But its rotational mathematics
gushes wind-explaining details — along with basic Thermodynamical principles.
— Searched for in established texts, nothing yet found. So, in this production,
based on the simple Kitchen vortex physics observation it
is certified; Already well attested on low latitudes, regular cyclones have
their trough vertically directed all through the troposphere, all the top-down
way. That marks the first simple verification of the simple explaining cyclic
atmospheric principle behind wind: centrifugal gravity ground-bound
high-density slow wind-mass linear momentum p=mv pushes air mass on
Pole-Equator with a faster return-suck on low-density flow Equator-Pole: The
Sun is just holding The Box warm — it has no cooling property. To be compared
and evaluated on already known basic physical principles.
Coriolis’ First Theorem m(v1² – v0²)/2
= ∫ P · cosΘ ds in its original conventional PREFIXxCOS (Persson1998p1378)
defines the energy of all Coriolis deflected Earth mv wind-mass-paths: all
Earth wind phenomena have Coriolis components, horizontal and vertical in
different amounts by different latitudes. Because the Coriolis effect is
exclusively generated — derived, TheBASIC ¦ TheMAL — from
Earth’s centrifugal forcing on near ground gravity-held air masses
(troposphere, 10KM), Earth rotation — centrifugation, Coriolis force — also
slowly reduces and cannot be retrieved again once it is lost through the
Coriolis taken frictional energy losses generated by centrifugation. As our Sun
has no Earth rotational — centrifugation — restoring physical connection, this
apparently means: Where wind mass
frictional — Coriolis — energy is taken down to Earth from the air above, it is
in the same proportion reducing Earth’s rotational energy source: Coriolis
affected wind mass p=mv decreases proportionally to reduced Earth
rotation-centrifugation. The more air friction — more wind poles active in time
— the faster the significant result. Compare reckonings on The600GWexample. But it has no established mentioning. Searched for. none yet found.
—
The decisive Question would be: If we remove all Coriolis effects from wind,
would there be any wind left? As the Coriolis effect builds on wind speed, affected
by Earths gravity-centrifugal bound semi-solid fluid air mass mobility, the
answer becomes simple: Removed Coriolis effect from Earth wind — independent of
wind directions — means a dead end wind phenomena. Shorter: Wind force is
Coriolis force: centrifugation physics — in a warm gravity box. It has no
generating — centrifugal — connection at all to heat from the Sun. The
Sun is just »Warming The Box». WIND is not heating, but restless cooling:
• fragmenting thermal equilibrium restlessly
trough rotation.
• Present day technology has entered a period of strong nature-hostile enterprise — praising itself to be a friend of the opposite — as already observed by many:
• it — documented, described and related — destroys everything in its path — by DRIFT. Not by plan.
We study that from the following in WindPowerOnEarth with further.
WindPowerOnEarth: 8Jul2022 — WIND ¦ THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM ¦ EARTHWind FUNDAMENTALS
AllMathPHYSICS ¦ The WINDprooof
WIND POWER ON EARTH
— on the quest of its origin
With the popular present timing idea that wind power on Earth is generated by our Sun (GENERAL INTERNET QUOTATIONS), one would expect some overwhelming convincing work explaining the details behind.
” Wind results from the movement of air due to atmospheric pressure gradients”,
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022
Exactly.
If the popular present idea that wind power on Earth really is generated by our Sun, really, has any substantial physical validity, then
— Why do we not find a mathematical account on that idea — not one spell — ?
Searched for. None yet found. Compare InternetQuotes.
• removing all rotation, leaving only the Sun's heat production should have the scientific potential power to explain the basics of wind power on Earth:
rotation is apparently never mentioned in the texts
as a wind power generator on Earth. But ..
• Available web sources (Jun2022) seem consistently confluent in consensus on leaving any explaining or mentioning on the subject out of view.
First preliminary result:
• We have no strict physical (or even mathematical) references at all on the idea of WIND on Earth IF all rotation is excluded: not even a physical or mathematical hint (not even an itty bitty tiny one) in the available and visible texts on the subject (Jun2022).
The WindFromSunArgument: BasicWindReference
INSOLATION ACCOMPLISHES NO COOLING EFFECT.
BUT EARTH’S ROTATION DOES PRECISELY THAT.
SO THAT WIND CAN BE GENERATED THROUGH TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
ON BASIC GAS LAW MATHEMATICS.
from an elementary centrifugal
Coriolis push physics
as also is stated in some established texts.
The idea that heat itself — Planck energy radiation E = hf — accomplishes mass convection is, or must be, a general widespread misunderstanding (INTERNET QUOTES) — if that is the case. It must be clarified — verified or disclaimed by solid argumentation:
• Wind is NOT generated by insolation. Wind is generated through centrifugation — breaking a general warm from a given heat source to a general temperature differentiation — wind. That is Earth’s collected resultants on rotational Coriolis effects — constantly breaking and fragmenting any possible thermal equilibrium from a constant heat source.
The WindFromRotationArgument:
EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS
EARTH’S ROTATION BREAKS DOWN ANY THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM
SECURING, CERTIFYING AND GUARANTEEING THAT
WIND
— TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES IN EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE
general gas law’s pV=kT
certifies that for a given volume V with gas constant k,
pressure p and temperature T are directly proportional:
p=T(k/V)
— CAN BE RELATED AS CAUSED BY
DIFFERENT TEMPERATURE REGIONS SEEKING TO LEVEL OUT
INTO A THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
ON BASIC GAS LAW MATHEMATICS.
as derived from an elementary
centrifugal Coriolis push physics
” Wind results from the movement of air due to atmospheric pressure gradients”,
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022
Exactly.
But it isn’t the Sun that makes it. It is the Earth’s rotation.
SO — IF CORRECTLY APPREHENDED:
Attempting to take down wind power from the atmosphere to Earth’s solid ground — in any significant amount during any significant period of time — means a proportional reduction in Earth’s rotational period: Biological ventilation is reduced as wind power and rotation: the day lengthens.
— See basic calculating comparing world energy examples in The 600TWexample.
From Introduction Maj2019:
Dumping normally cyclic alive Leaf&Needle into increasing atmospheric CO2, carbon dioxide, as after a wildfire, never allowing it to return to its original nature forest condition — generates more insolation up taking heat.
Calculating the 1800+ accumulated atmospheric Leaf&Needle CO2 dump into the atmosphere (1800+) on a heat capacitive (carbon dioxide) mathematical basis, yields a rough extra Tornado visiting the populations on Earth in different regions and times. ¦ WindPOWERonEarth.
General: Wind power on Earth
WE ARE NOT SEEKING A CONSENSUS — ONLY INSIGHT INTO THE NATURE OF PHYSICS: explanations. Not votes.
So: If the reader is looking for votes, please:
— »Get the fuck out of my Beach» (BAYWATCH 2017).
WIND POWER
See also table in GroundWindSpeeds.
ONE CENTRAL REFERENCE: The principle affection of wind on Earth’s rotation — NASA article 2003 — not many seem to have observed that part:
• there is a dependence between Earth rotation and WIND: — air friction, wind — affects Earth rotation.
Compare the basics of ideation in the Wind Issue:
”..
and since the sun heats different parts of the Earth differently,
causing pressure
differences,
the Sun is
the driving force for most winds”,
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022
AS IF THE EARTH WOULD HAVE NO ROTATION.
Compare a more soberly related resolution:
’.. and since the sun heats different parts of the Earth differently,
CAUSED BY EARTH’S ROTATION WHICH FRAGMENTS ANY THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM
causing pressure differences,
the Sun is
IN NO PHYSICAL WAY TO BE CONSIDERED AS
the driving force for winds’,
And again:
” Wind results from the movement of air due to atmospheric pressure gradients”,
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022
Exactly. Excellent formulation.
The Agent ”causing pressure differences” is not the Sun (Simple Wind Proof). The Agent is or can so be related to be unless disclaimed by physical argumentation Earth’s rotational centrifugal force — with the Coriolis effect — pushing gas from pole (cold) to equator (warm) — thereby generating a corresponding back-push (The simple Vortex Kitchen WIND example): a cyclic wind system has been established never reaching equilibrium, constantly chasing its own equilibrium tail — basically independent on insolation heat, only on the temperature differences generated by the rotational effect in its centrifugal gas push:
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
See also table in GroundWindSpeeds.
If we look (none mentioned: there are many available PDF-documents for study) at the level of mathematics in the different texts on Atmospheric Circulation (The Pole-Ferrel-Hadley cells) all of them in established corridors, as far as here is known, deal with closed (convection) thermal loops — on different modeling premises (some of them also admitting the complexity of the branch: nobody understands it). The rotational centrifugal gas pushing alternative has none of those mathematical features.
WindPower: WindBASICS ¦ WIND ¦ WHACNE ¦ WindOnEARTHbasics
ForeWord
• Article-authors @Internet in general seem not (even) aware of a measured (NASA article 2003)
• dependence between Earth rotation and WIND — air friction —
wind — affects Earth rotation the fact that such physics do exist
Vindkraft, sv. Wikipedia (19Jun2022):
”Vindkraften är en form av omvandlad solenergi och drivs av vindarna som uppstår då jorden och dess atmosfär värms av solen.[1]”.
[1]”Energikunskap — Vind” — Energimyndigheten i Sverige 2011-08-03:
”Vind Vindenergin har sitt ursprung i solen.” SVENSK FÖRFATTNING.
Ingen referens. Ingen förklaring: ”Wind energy has its origin in the sun.”.
FÖR ATT UNDERSTRYKA KRITIKEN, RELATERAT — inget skoj:
Statsrätten kränker människorätten ¦ Naturvetenskapen 1800+ ¦ LISTAN ¦ INERTIA ¦ noMACfysik
Huvuddelen av den moderna akademins lärostolar i ämnena matematik och fysik är kan visas vara UPPFUNNA — inte härledda (WhyMAC) — av en akademisk elit (1800+) som — tydligen — förväntar sig att också resterande del av mänsklighetens ska hoppa jämfota i skadeglädje över det oerhörda universella privilegiet att också få härma apkonsterna offentligt. Med enda slutfacit på en totalförstörd biotopisk Jordnatur (Jun2022)
SWEDEN — once a placid place — 2022 north to south: even
more heavy further reductions of original natural forests. Sweden:
lost manifest.
— Sweden is accelerating its
governmental care for Universal Animal Rights ..
— helt körd i botten (GlobalWatchers). Utöver innehållet i den här presentationen: Se detaljer i
Statsrätten kränker människorätten ¦ Naturvetenskapen 1800+ ¦ LISTAN ¦ INERTIA ¦ noMACfysik — Relaterat bevisbart, förklarbart och exemplifierbart. In till sista atom eller så inte alls.
Det handlar inte om att hävda ett specifikt synsätt över ett annat. Eller gör det?
Ämnet avser helt och hållet en NATURVETENSKAPLIG harmonigrundad (VectorMATH) HELTÄCKANDE FÖRKLARING — speciellt hur och varför modern akademi kunde hamna sist i klassen — och helt suveränt överlägset representera den här, synbart uppenbart: Den Kända Mänskliga historiens värsta svinaktiga lågprofil i förmågan att SORTERA naturinnehållet i — inuti — en redan existerande intelligens. Fattas bara att dessa Äss också ska konvertera till gruppen Gamla Testamentets Miljövänner. (Därför ATT) Då blir det helt säkert åka av ..
ABILITY: WindPOWER
— VILL DU PÅSTÅ I ALLMÄNHET ATT FOLK I SVENSK
ADMINISTRATION OCH ÖVRIGA SKULLE VARA OSERIÖSA I VARDAGEN?
— VAD TYCKER DU SJÄLV ATT DET SER UT SOM?
FÖRMÅGAN ATT UPPRÖRAS I BLOTTA
ÅSYNEN AV EN UPPENBART PÅGÅENDE NATURMISSHANDEL — ofta också kallad
”skötsel” — var?
• Av DRIFT. Inte plan. Någonting gick helt fel i
vetenskapshistorien 1800+ .. Väldigt mycket helt fel. Alldeles helt säkert
tydligt rejält mycket djupt fundamentalt helt fel.
SVERIGE — ETT RENT TEKNISKT UNDERUTVECKLAT SAMHÄLLE — MED speciellt LÅG MATEMATIKFATTNING
Eleverna undanhålls
grundläggande matematikkunskaper —
naturlära
• Av DRIFT. Inte plan. Någonting gick helt fel i
vetenskapshistorien 1800+ .. Väldigt mycket helt fel. Alldeles helt säkert
tydligt rejält mycket djupt fundamentalt helt fel.
Säg igen. Vad var det som ville framhållas för något sas det?
Affärerna blomstar — naturen
går på knäna .. öppet blödande natursår ..
Inte ett ord människorätt.
• Bevisbart NollIntresse för ”.. varje individ och varje organ i samhället ..”. Helt rent. Inte ett knyst. Sverige under 70 år.
”.. every individual and every organ of society ..”.
Ingen erinran. Inget omnämnande. Inget påtalande.
Allt flera tidigare fria öppna webbsidor blockeras
med krav på — vad då Sveriges Riksdag?
— Erkännande — igenkännande — av grundläggande mänskliga rättigheter
.. every individual and every organ of society ..”
”.. keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by
teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by
progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and
effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States
themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.”
?
— Skäms med sig. Alldeles uppenbart tydligt absolut i 100%. Sätter man sin fot i Sveriges Riksdag blir man smittad av djupgående dåligt inflytande enbart i anledning av att någon Typ öppnar munnen och börjar glappa med käken, i dagen läge:
INTE PÅ GRUND AV ATT DET ÄR NÅGOT FEL PÅ INTELLIGENSEN. UTAN ISTÄLLET HELT FUNDAMENTALT SÄKERT I 100 ATT BEVEKELSEGRUNDERNA FÖR ATT ANVÄNDA INNEHÅLLET INTE ÄR LOKALENS MEST POPULÄRA HUSDJUR.
• Visar man inte en undergivenhestgest att acceptera cookies — »vi vill utnyttja dig genom att påtvinga dig avbrott tills du ger med dig», om och om och om och om igen — får man inte titta längre på affärens sortiment: webbsidan är spärrad. Man får inte titta på vädret heller, inte på någonting alls (4Nov2020): inte hälsovårdsmyndigheten, inte polisen, inte domstolarna, inte regeringskansliet, inte ens den egna e-posten — Microsoft&Googles lydiga kärringar hela högen,
”.. to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind ..”, K8 UDHR10Dec1948. SVERIGE 2022. Helt okänt.
WhyMAC: TheMAL ¦ THERMODYNAMICAL
EQUILIBRIUM ¦ CompareRelatedModernIDEA
Why (1800+) Modern ACademy lost its way IN
basic MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS
in its attempt to find a fully relatable — logical
— explanation to the cosmic existence
Elementary Related Physics —
based on (Galileo Galilei, 1632¦1636) the elementary Force Law (Sw. Kraftlagen):
a = a = a(m/m) = (ma)/m = F/m = w²/r = mass independent — compare fully explained The MIT-example;
———————————————
CENTRAL
acceleration — centripetal and centrifugal ¦ gravitation basics ¦ Central acceleration ¦ ForceLaAW ¦ GravitationLAW — basic ¦ GravitationLAW — general ¦ NeutronDECAY
The atomic nucleus — the
fundamental Neutron: Planck Constant h = mcr, The PlanckRING — is:
Gravitation’s Fundamental FORM (F75):
• equal to all matter
• can NOT be shielded from — and hence:
• time independent
as opposed to THE NATURE OF LIGHT (electricity — magnetism and induction: divergence, as opposed to convergence ¦ F76)
• different to all matter
• can be shielded from — and hence:
• time dependent
it — time independence —
can of course NOT be compressed, of course not.— But modern academy
1800+ invented just such irrational ideas — for securing its own fundamental
idea of representing universal supremacy (banning Boltzmann’s Atomic Universe
too); it never made even an attempt to deduce it.
HOW?
Related physics in TNED
MODERN ACADEMY NEVER HAD ITS MOST POPULAR PET AS LOGICS AND PHILOSOPHY — ESPECIALLY NOT IN MATHEMATICS
THE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPLE STRUCTURE OF MASS
MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION — The
Seven Principles of Physics: PASTOM
(F77) — Mass Structure’s Principle
Math’s form:
ENERGY LAW’S SECOND MAIN CLAUSE
• m in a=am/m=F/m can be destroyed (extincted) because a i m=ma/a=F/a is indestructible
energy can neither be created,
nor destroyed, only converted: E = Fd = m· a · d
apparently points to a primary mass (a RING angular momentum) destructor:
• The Planck energy E =
hf = mcrf = mcr/t = mc²
ITS VALIDITY
— a complete mass destruction with zero remaining mass
(COEI conservation of energy by
induction)
transferring mass energy to massless electromagnetic energy
: Solar light and heat energy from ±e pair annihilation
— apparently demands a STRUCTURE in a PROCESS equally apparently based on
(n→∞: amount n approaching the infinite [QUANTITY INDEPENDENT] endless)
• an unlimited FRACTAL structure explaining in full related detail THAT
• m = m(n→∞)(n→∞)–1 = (F/a)(n→∞)–1(n→∞) = (F/[a(n→∞)])(n→∞) = m’(n→∞)
IT apparently DESCRIBES A FRACTAL STRUCTURE CONSISTING OF AN ENDLESS PROVISION OF HOLLOW PLANCK RINGS INSIDE HOLLOW PLANCK RINGS — not a form by volume but by a SURFACE FRACTAL DIVISION PROCESS (±e electric surface structure: the p-n-surface structure of the atomic nucleus) — principally same drive as the basic biological cell dividing phenomena (electro-gravital resonances governing molecular compositions)
• The never (energy law) created Neutron:
• The electric-magnetic interaction in the complex certifies the preservation of the form — until its ±e components are separated and a mass destruction releases heat and light. All these details have specific articles in UH for scrutinized investigation — in certifying their connection to known experimentation (Particle physics and their mathematics).
• See further details on the atomic nucleus deduction in TNED from TNEDbegin (1993+) — unit without parts.
Summing
In order to remove the aspect of MASS —
(COEI conservation of energy by
induction)
the property of mass must not have particles of any sort, type or nature connecting to any kind of a definite shape, form, nature or type
— exactly as gallantly illustrated by Nature:
Author’s Illustrated composition — Photos 2009+ — »My
personal Experimental Particle Accelerator ..» ..
NATURE SHOWS US THE ANALOGIES THROUGH THE PARAGONS,
STRUCTURES AND PATTERNS IN NATURAL NATURE. Why was never modern academy
impressed? Ask them.
• MODERN ACADEMY: »Because water drops have definite shape and form, they must exist inside the sea».
MustBuyBook.
— ”»The atomic nucleus consists of Protons and Neutrons»”.
• RELATED PHYSICS: The atomic nucleus — gravitation’s fundamental form — has no constituent parts:
— 1 = 1+1+1+.. ÷ n = (354+1)/355 = [(12+13)/5]/5 .. = 1
But the surface charge morphology can be described by a n-p-n-structure which classifies the general nuclear charts (NUCchart):
• electric charge and magnetic moment.
• See also details in The MIC-EQUIVALENTS (Mass Interactive Connection in TNED);
• it apparently was imperative for modern academy to invent its own niche in universe — to clearly take a distance ..
MODERN ACADEMY apparently NEVER HAD ITS MOST POPULAR PET AS LOGICS AND PHILOSOPHY — ESPECIALLY NOT ON THE LEVEL OF MATHEMATICS (also compare: the ZeroINTEGRAL)
— See
• The AtomTriangle with
• Zero Form Algebra with
• The QuantityIndependent [∞: The EULER EQUIVALENTS: (1+ξ/∞)∞ = (1+1/∞)ξ∞]
— and the definition of the differential, integral and derivative, with simple and elementary examples.
»Simple and easy to understand details», all of them.
— Why was not modern academy (1800+) impressed? Ask them.
See in specific
• Deduced Reckoning Laws for the Quantity Independent
• Continuity Concept in DEDEKIND’S BOX
• Cantor’s Cardinal Combinatorics: The DECIMAL NUMBERS’ ENUMERABILITY
• WEIERSTRASS — (the differentiability of functions ¦ ModernAcademy’s dxDx ¦ Exempel 5 — ”the process is the quantity”
• The FUNCTION CLASSES IN RELATED MATHEMATICS (Equation Teaching)
• VARIANTS AND UNIVERSALS IN RELATED MATHEMATICS: HigherANALYSIS ¦ Interface’s Functional Ranges (FormLAWS)
• Global water-fluxes’ general equation — ELECTROPHYCIS’ GENERAL VARIANT (Capacitance and Inductance basics)
• All MATHEMATICS DOCUMENTS in UniverseHistory
• The LIST — comparing modern academy with related mathematics and physics — Physics most important concepts
♦ PHYSICS’
GENERAL EXPLANATION in short, illustrated (c<=0: NEGATIVE DIVERGENCE)
Further details by consequence
• Outside The central universal K-cell: gravitation certifies (Fig:1) that divergence (speed of light) is zero — and hence THAT
• the general neutron mass c0-body surrounding the K-cell never decays:
• it lies dormant — until a refill when the K-cell contracts — after a period of expansion, allowing the mass defect part to be replaced by neutrons for a next expansion period (See The Deduced K-cell DETONATION-Mathematical Physics, in detail).
• See in explicit (for modern academy comparison) Gravitational Redshift — Critical Universe Density — AndromedaTEST: strong suggested direct TNED proof of the K-cell and its gravitational center.
Just simple (but vast) plain deduced mathematics — applied to observed properties in physics: instrumentation and experimental measures.
General State Law: ARTICLE ¦ WhyMAC
TNED physics
THE SAME MASS-MATHEMATICS ALSO APPLIES TO THE SIMPLE
GENERAL COSMIC c0-BODY
Allmänna tillståndslagen —
General StateLAW — K-cell constant gravtational energy
ALSO: K1 + K2 minusMassDefect (m→γ) = K nuclear reaction law in TNED:
See full details in ........ EXOTHERMAL NUCLEAR REACTION LAW ¦ Applications, see DifferenceGRAPHS (calculating atomic masses for comparison)
The constant k is given here as a general pöroportionality
constant [here = 1] for a given geometry
Statement:
A constant local cosmic cell energy (EG) through an inner limited mass (mK) enveloped by a general cosmic here coined c0Body
(c0 from the Cheops Rectangle math: lights gravitational dependency: c0 is certified not to be affected by gravitation)
CAN be conserved of a spherically formed unlimited mass (the c0-body ¦ THE K-CELLc0BodyCROSSING) with unlimited radius (r) IF it experiences a contraction with an exact same mass destroying factor r[n→∞]–1 as the one generating the heat and the light produced by [the square of] the mass destruction (m→γ) during the (active heat) K-cell expansion period. This part is represented by the upper (G1) expression for the gravitational energy (EG).
• This holds because same expression also can be written as the lower (G2) rank shows:
• the mass is unlimited with unlimited spherical (k=1) radius.
(The Euler equivalents: the quantity independent ∞ — never mentioned in modern quarters, as far as here is known);
• Then the statement is proved.
Related, clarified:
• LEAST POSSIBLE CONTRACTIVE REFILLING NEUTRON MASS in the K-cell
(c0 from the Cheops Rectangle math: lights gravitational dependency: c0 is certified not to be affected by gravitation)
the active and expanding Universe: mK = 4,14 T53 KG ¦ half period mK(t) = 336Gy — (mK2/[n→∞]), same as the least possible energy mass (m = E/c02) consumed during the expansion period by stars from thermonuclear reactions
is given by least possible contraction (r[n→∞]–1);
• But its form (G1)
E = G · (mK2/[n→∞]) / (r[n→∞]–1) is precisely mathematically-logically-formally the same as
E = G · (mK2 [n→∞]) / (r[n→∞] );
• Because — ∞ : The EULER EQUIVALENTS: (1+ξ/∞)∞ = (1+1/∞)ξ∞: the quantity independent — apparently never observed in modern quarters — the quantity independent ∞ also has the mathematical properties of ∞ = A·∞ = ∞/A, A any fix quantity,
• the E-expressions can be interpreted as holding equally for the entire limitless c0-body as well as its inside pulsating K-cell mass:
• no time restriction. Eternal pulse. Question it: try to break it; Have been searched for, no onset yet found.
There never was any ultimate creation — only an awakening:
• human evolves from dormant recognition to actual (some 200 000 years ago):
• ”In the beginning ..” — then — has no other rational reference: the ”.. eternal .. ” part.
SOME OF THESE DEEP QUESTS ARE ALSO VENTED IN The Act of Perception ¦ Phenomena and Cognition.
That is definitely NOT the modern academy table.
It seemed important 1800+ to dismiss that part by careful invention of the opposite — whatever.
• MODERN ACADEMY GOES MUSEUM. Say again.
What replaces the
reduction of the previous existent sunlight energy up taking and sustaining
life power, Leaf&Needle?
— The eye meets the sight
of a catastrophe. A highly depressing sight. Resemblance: a human constructed heavy wild fire.
Insensitive to natural science? Come again.
DifferenceGRAPHS:
GeneralStateLaw
This
is how deduced related physics looks like
— on the level of atomic and nuclear physics
experimentally measured ÷ TNED general
NeutronSquare Elliptic Functions calculated
Datapoints show deviations from exact equal (1.0000) between theory and
experiment:
Orange: ............. Related
physics and mathematics — TNED: toroid math by Planck’s Structural Constant: The NeutronSquare:
GRAY: .............. Modern
academy — Water Volume Models, Weizsäcker
All values experimental/theory refer: only stable nuclides : from 1 H 1
to 83 Bi
209
This
is how modern academic consensus looks like
— on the level of atomic and nuclear physics:
experimentally measured ÷ Modern Academic
Theory (Weizsäcker)
Resulting Picture:
• Modern Academy Invented — by academic consensus — its idea of The Atomic Nucleus.
— Its practical side in Nature is more or less a Doll’s House Theater.
• In related physics and mathematics, we deduce everything from scratch — or not at all until we have proof:
— Compare EarthMass as an example (proving communicating quantities over different physical domains).
• Instrumentation and experimental physics are our only guides here: experimental observation + Nature.
• A Very high level of self critique — errors and mistakes are impossible to avoid. If in doubt: don’t. Wait.
• A computer is an aid, a tool, a help. NOT The Master.
TNED-REFINED more special RESULTS by MORE PRECISE (ITERATIVE) NEUTRON SQUARE ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS:
— These results — manually performed iterations (with spread sheet aid) — are (at present, yet 2022) time consuming. Only the most urging parts have here been analyzed (and recalculated) in order to have some precise resulting TNED data for comparing and proving purposes.
Further details in TNEDa0. See also Microsoft’s Destruction of The MOD Operator — destroying the original presentation of the TNED Atomic Mass Table in MsWORKS 4.0. The most convenient resolution of That Issue: »This author is WRONG». Please do share.
Relation 1 electron mass / 1 neutron mass: ca 1/1836 ——
HORIZONTAL SCALE: MassNumber 1 to 209
ALL STABLE NUCLEI —— LBL: 2003—Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Data Tables = 0 preference
The differences
— at least in some cases — lie close to the possible experimental errors (mass
spectroscopic charge acceleration mass increase effects). Here, we have no
reference for determining the margins — these are not accounted for in the
general experimental presentation of established data.
— In a lager
scale the compared results between TNED and MAC are exposed in the following
graphs — vertical atomic mass defect scale in TNED:s Neutron Square. See The TNED
Neutron Square Atomic 1818-18 Preference.
Conparing theoretical results with experimentally measured values
While the TNED calculated
values are not visibly different from the experimentally measured
HOP
1967 ¦
CODATA 2008 ¦ LBL 2003—Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Explicit comparison between HOP and CODATA is given in CODATA/HOP
the modern
academy MAC
theoretically Weizsäcker calculated vales [Weizsäcker
equation] differ so strongly from the
experimentally measured values — especially in the beginning of the nuclear
chart — that any reasonable precise comparison is way out of the question.
Another
verification between TNED and particle experiments is given in Hofstadter’s
Electton Scattering results: nuclear charge density.
Another
verification between TNED and particle experiments is given in SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS results.
See also
confirmations between TNED and experiments in [General Results] Collisions between spinning Protons.
In fact — as it
has been searched for: no offending argument has yet been found against TNED.
Still searching ..
See in explicit Wu1957: The Dramatic Electron Emission
Experiment by Wu, Ambler, Hayward, Hoppes and Hudson 1957.
See also in
explicit (Neutron’s magnetic moment): The Deacy of The Neutron: Part1
and Part 2 — The Nuclear Charge
n-p-n-structure.
EnergyLAW: 24Jun2022 —
governed by a General State Law in related physics ¦ PHYSICS’
SEVEN PRINCIPLES ¦ Energy Law ¦ EnergyLawMoreRELATED
CLARIFYING
THE ENERGY LAW
IN RELATED PHYSICS — comparing
modern academics
• The term ”energy law” in English does not apply to this subject, but to (Wikipedia, Energy law — 24Jun2022) ”Energy laws govern the use and taxation of energy”. The appropriate English term here is: Conservation of energy — associating modern academy’s First law of thermodynamics:
@INTERNET
Wikipedia, First law of thermodynamics [25Apr2014]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_law_of_thermodynamics
” The first law of thermodynamics is a version of the law of conservation of energy, adapted for thermodynamic systems. The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system is constant”.
@INTERNET
Wikipedia, First law of thermodynamics [24Jun2022]:
” The first law of thermodynamics is a version of the law of conservation of energy, adapted for thermodynamic processes, distinguishing three kinds of transfer of energy, as heat, as thermodynamic work, and as energy associated with matter transfer, and relating them to a function of a body’s state called internal energy.
The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system (for which energy and matter transfer through the system boundary are not possible) is constant”.
@INTERNET
Wikipedia, Conservation of energy [24Jun2022]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_energy
” In physics and chemistry, the law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant; it is said to be conserved over time.[1]”,
” Conservation of energy can be rigorously proven by Noether’s theorem as a consequence of continuous time translation symmetry, that is, from the fact that the laws of physics do not change over time.”;
” Noether’s theorem .. states that every differentiable symmetry of the action of a physical system with conservative forces has a corresponding conservation law.[1]”.
• On the observation that modern academy ”often uses” the ”Δx=dx”, the probability that also ”differentiable symmetry” has OTHER Issues — further revealed by further modern academic consultation — type ”learn more”. This said: the details of the MAC-system on this level have not (yet) been analyzed (here). But clear it is already here: modern academy has great problems in explaining simple physics on a straight and rational foundation. Compare related physics and mathematics in INDEPENDENT — short.
• In related physics (GeneralStateLAW), there are no ”isolated systems” in any kind, type or sort of a thermodynamical nature:
• HEAT — Planck energy radiation (E=hf=mcr/t=mcc) in any part of the universe where divergence (speed of light) > 0 — leaks out from any material body (the Compton Effect: interaction between radiation and mass: all original electromagnetic radiation loses frequency when passing through matter: the nature of heat flow; always from warmer to colder), and cannot be completely isolated or inhibited to do so — and everybody in modern academy KNOWS it to be so, especially by experimentation:
• The total energy at any moment in a limited and closed material system is not conserved. The only related possibility for energy to be conserved can only be a material not limited (The c0-body ¦ General cosmic state law) with that character that the leaking Planck energy radiation (COEI conservation of energy by induction: the general mass destruction transferring mass to radiation/gamma m→γ further below) in every part and detail is balanced by an equally large unlimited supply of non-radiative gravitational mass (The Neutron: Planck Constant h=mcr) — governed by Light’s Gravitational Dependency (Fig.1) — certifying that the c0-constant is preserved independent of gravitation — (The simple Cheops Rectangle geometrical math) and the neutron supply is resting outside The central universal K-cell in a negative divergence — meaning no neutron decay until neutrons enter the positive K-cell divergence regions (c>0). Then, and only then, the radiation leakage m→γ can ”hide” in the general c0-body, and thereby be preserved.
That is why related physics cannot adopt the so irrelevant and directly physically faulty modern academic formulation of the details of the universal energy law. Related physics instead takes the statements from a more classical elementary physical and mathematical standpoint, as deduced and related below. The end line is though the same:
• energy (WORK: E=hf=mvr/t=mvv) cannot be created, nor destroyed, only converted. There are two inside clauses, further below.
• Because modern academy ends its philosophy of nature on its idea of a definite and total limited mass in existence identified as the limited mass of our universe (4.14 T53 KG) — although even modern quarters know that no matter the view, there is always more mass behind, no here known exceptions, for starters — modern academy (1800+) consequently was forced to invent a series of ”physical laws” pertaining to that: a limited totality of cosmic mass — so ending at ”The first law of thermodynamics” with its ”closed systems” clauses (»a doll’s house theater» compared to nature, says related physics — by examples: related physics = experimental results; nature).
In related physics the situation is different (with much more simple and direct formulations: only basic math and physics). See from (Sw.) QuoteMAC, AdiabaticMAC, and here further (MAC, Modern ACademy) from WhyMAC, and the following.
EnergyLAW — in related physics
— principle of motion: the indestructible interval
An interval (Δx) must exist for a motion (v = d/t) to be detected; The force (F = ma = m· dv/dt), or actually the impulse/linear momentum p=mv, presupposes motion (impulse — interval — mv precedes force ma — acceleration: an interval a0tod must unconditionally exist prior to a detected acceleration); The interval is any Δd with optimal variation a=dv/dt.
• AS the interval (Δx) is indestructible,
ZERO — 0 — is
no interval — 0 to 1:
As recently noted: much more
simple, fundamental and easy to understand natural basics: mechanics,
induction, magnetism, electricity — see also in ARTICLE above
with further detailing links:
• Interval — 0 to 1 — is, what we know, the
only providing property in logics on which foundation the whole domain of
mathematics is resting: enumeration 1 + 1 + 1 +
.. with the
five operators +
– × ÷ √ (from Cheops Rectangle); the basic laws with algebra, the
reckoning laws.
— And hence our human perception, thinking and
philosophy.
”Natural philosophy is written in that great book
which always lie open before our eyes — I mean the universe; but it cannot be
read until we have learned the language and know the letters with which it is
written. It is written on a mathematical language and its letters are
triangles, circles and other geometrical figures, and without these aids it is
impossible for man to understand one single word.”
GALILEO GALILEI 1636, cited from Swedish edition
of SIGMA Volume 2, James R. Newman,
FORUM 1959, here freely translated back to English
• ONE interval — a difference — has TWO end points.
• A differential
has only one point: the position-point zero in the transit from
position-points to quantity-amounts: nothing.
•
Interval’s extinction or ceasing or abolition becomes with that
implication a pure absurdity, a complete impossibility;
• In Modern
Academy (1800s) one has excluded that logics recognition by inventing
corresponding academic superstructures.
See DEDKINDS
LÅDA (Dedekind’s Box — the concept of continuity) and CANTORS
KARDINALMATEMATIK (Cantor’s Cardinal mathematics) with
others.
•
Eliminating the interval eliminates the possibility of formulating
anything — relatable connecting to nature — understandable at all.
— Exactly that happened with the growth in Modern
Academy 1800+: Inventions instead of Deductions — for marking the modern
academic repulsive attitude (See Swedish
quotes in SANNINGENS BORTGÅNG The passing away of Truth) against
an already existing natural harmony. That is the only here known common and
general explanation in related mathematics for how and why modern academy NOT
is able to interact CONSTRUCTIVELY along With nature: constant conflict from
square one (1800+).
• The
early science — in principle from Zeno to Newton — had the natural conditions.
Those were definitely broken during the 1800s.
AtomTriangle in related mathematics —
• interval 0-1 is reserved and can never as such be eliminated no matter the attempt to divide it in smaller parts (See ZENO’S
THEOREM that term was coined here in
Universe History in dealing with the historic background).
so is also the motion (a0tod), and thereby the energy (E=Fd=mad=mvd/t=mv²):
ENERGY CAN NEITHER BE CREATED NOR BE DESTROYED BUT MUST BE IMPLIED (GSL ¦ The c0-body ¦ CosmicEnergyLAW);
The related reasoning behind: — mass destruction: our Sun,
and the light and heat it brings from mass annihilation ±e
mass can be destroyed (m→γ) [extraction of the mass energy] — because it cannot be created:
(1) m in a=am/m=F/m can not be created or formed because a in m=ma/a=F/a must be implied (interval’s indestructibility, as above)
(2) m in a=am/m=F/m can be annihilated because (1) [interval in v i a=v/t] a in m=ma/a=F/a is indestructible, (m→γ)
(see pair annihilation)
In the latter case a is moved (the indestructible interval in v in a=v/t) just over onto other (atomic) masses (heat, light) without any aid of any kind of transporting mass (via induction by COEI (conservation of energy by induction ¦ Light’s liberty from kinetics: c and v are not additive) Uind = E=UQ/Qs = L(di/dt)k = Λk = kRTQ/T2 = kRQ/T = kRI = kU), whereby energy is conserved.
UNIVERSAL COSMIC ENERGY LAW
MOTION’S PRINCIPLE [POM (Principle of motion — impulse/linear momentum mv precedes force F=ma=m·dv/dt):
it is impossible to establish a force
F = ma = m(dv/dt)
without starting out from something already in motion;
p = mv
impulse (p) precedes force (F)
founds the cosmic universal energy-law [interval’s indestructibility]. An interval must exist for proving a motion; the force implies the motion; the interval is any Δd with optimal variation a=dv/dt. As interval is indestructible (APARC Absolute physical reference: a state must always refer an equilibrium, a balance: there are no inertial systems in physics; physical laws hold for systems, never in them), so is also the motion (a0tod ), and thereby the energy E = Fd = mad = m(v/t)d = mv² : energy can neither be created nor be destroyed, but must be presupposed.
Summation
Modern academic teaching system has no part in these formulations: they destroy modern academic cosmological theory completely — by showing them to be primitive, highly far from any natural provision.
IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCE (The deduction of the atomic nucleus)
Author’s Illustrated composition — Photos 2009+ — »My
personal Experimental Particle Accelerator ..» ..
NATURE SHOWS US THE ANALOGIES THROUGH THE PARAGONS,
STRUCTURES AND PATTERNS IN NATURAL NATURE. Why was never modern academy
impressed? Ask them.
As mass cannot be created, the electron is (deployed out of the neutron [NEUTRON’S DECAY]) a fundamental part of the atomic nucleus (The assumption of parity conservation, Wu1957 ¦ BT-field : ”They showed that the electrons are emitted, by the decaying Co60 nucleus, preferentially in the direction of its spin.”; how related physics verifies the electron deploy from the atomic nucleus) — in the same way as water drops deploy from a more massive water mass, and then again unite with it without being intercepted as freely moving inside as individual particles:
COMPARE MODERN AND RELATED PHYSICS:
Compare
— related physics — neutron decay in components
RELATED
PHYSICS:
SP+Se SP + Se
+ 0 ←
sum inner ringspinn
0n1 → 1H1+
e– + (m→γ)
............................ mass-equivalent
0n1 → 1H1+
e– + γ)
............................ energy-equivalent
nτ = pt +
et
....................................................... τ-ring-Current’s spin-equivalent
0 1/2 –1/2
...................................................... sum of all spin and momentum is zero
MODERN
ACADEMY:
1/2 1/2
+1/2 + 1/2 ←
”sum spin”
0n1 → 1H1+
e– + ν)
............................ ”energy-equivalent”
See also the DifferenceGRAPHS; there is no doubt about it.
See further comparing details in Deducing the SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS in related physics.
THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM: 28Jul2022 —
BasicWindReference ¦
TheWindPROOF
¦ EARTHWind FUNDAMENTALS ¦ AfterMATH
INTERNET SEARCH 28Jul2022 :
1 — ”Proof that wind on Earth is generated by the Sun”:
” There are no results for ”Proof that wind on Earth is generated by the Sun” ”
2 — ”Proving the Sun as a generator of Earth’s winds”:
” There are no results for ”Proving the Sun as a generator of Earth’s winds” ”
..
Basic physics — please clarify
if objected:
expansion —
centrifugation — without rotation does not exist in physics:
rotation 
Planck constant h=mcr precedes defines convection 
the atomic nucleus: only rotation can generate wind:
The Wind Foundation: only rotation
can generate wind please do clarify if objected:
Reminded Physics
Fundamentals: Centrifugation — on mobile masses entailing the Coriolis effect (Coriolis’ two theorems, Persson1998)
— without an already existent rotation does not exist in physics. Short:
rotation precedes Convection °° by
physical principle; convection cannot precede rotation. Short Conclusive
Principal Physics: only rotation can generate wind. The physical —
thermodynamical — base thermodynamical equilibrium is the general Planck
radiation physics (Planck
radiation law as derived from Planck Entropy statement):
no mass move, just light electromagnetic divergent massless radiation — light
passing near gravitating objects exposes no centrifugal properties (The Solar
Eclipse Observations 1919+ — Michelson and Morley Experiments 1881+
¦ BradleyAbberation1725:
light has no connection to kinetics, no mother god loving way ¦ COEI
conservation of energy by induction):
THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM (THEDE):
After several tedious attempts
— all leaving unsatisfactory tails of unclear resolutions ..
PRESENT RESOLUTION ON THE QUEST OF INSOLATION INFLUENCE ON EARTH'S WIND SYSTEM
See: State attacks Nature — apparently 100% unaware of the consequences unless someone can disclaim the documents
Basic statement:
• Heat (Planck radiation) flow exists, absolutely, in/through a thermodynamical equilibrium. But NO MASS FLOW:
• no mass motion:
• no wind.
As related:
AND SO IT IS STATED ALSO IN ESTABLISHED CORRIDORS (unless changes are about, as normally is the case in these times .. Compare: “dark energy” and the like instead of a related and precisely mathematically deduced Gravitational Redshift .. CARBO — The Andromeda Test):
• " In thermodynamic equilibrium there are no net macroscopic flows of matter or of energy, within a
system or between systems. In a system that is in its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium,
no macroscopic change occurs."
Wikipedia, Thermodynamic Equilibrium (28Jul2022):
BUT HOW IS THAT PRACTICALLY PROVEN — beyond any doubt?
The (1M³) closed gas box, with a vertically mounted constant heat source on top, could be an object of research:
The WindProof
• After some time of stabilization, a state of THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM should appear inside the box:
• There are stable different temperature gradients on different locations — which could easily be proven by discretely mounted thermal sensors.
• But how can we safely prove that no mass motion of gas between the different temperature gradients is at hand?
— The only way to prove such a phenomena, would be to use some mechanical device, a propeller, proving a mechanical kinetic gas move — on the level of gas molecular sensitivity. What is known here: no such sensing apparatus is known:
• We cannot measure local differences between local average gas molecular velocities — thermal equilibrium — and local average gas transportation — wind — unless MAYBE by adding some radioactive tracers in the gas, trying to measure their (individually exact) position by the tick of seconds. Maybe.
— What we know (here, at the present): no such experimentation has ever been made.
• But the Theory of an implied THERMODYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM — no change in or of material positions — demands the already stated; As quoted:
“ In a system that is in its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium,
no macroscopic change occurs.",
Wikipedia, Thermodynamic Equilibrium (28Jul2022):
No wind. Just Planck radiation heat flow:
• No wind on an Earth with no rotation — as a gravitationally closed box (The WindProof), heated by a constant Planck radiation heat flow from the Sun. No wind on a standstill Earth — facing the same front side to the Sun.
SEVERAL AVAILABLE INTERNET SOURCES — however — illustrate a hypothetical standstill Earth to HAVE air convection — as for example in the enlightening
Tropical
Cyclones (Hurricanes), Tulane University 2011
http://www.tulane.edu/~sanelson/New_Orleans_and_Hurricanes/tropical_cyclones.pdf
and others. Again — based on “intuitive implication” unless further specified
:
“ If the Earth were not rotating, this would result in a convection cell, with warm moist air rising at
the equator, spreading toward the poles along the top of the troposphere, cooling as it moves
poleward, then descending at the poles, as shown in the diagram above.”, page 1 of 17.
No reference is mentioned or given to a generally known proof of the statement.
The source has a
References marked as a link last — but there is no further connection from there.
With the possibility of a Thermodynamic Equilibrium
in mind, as stated, consider this alternative:
• At several occasions the last decade (2012+), the summer morning temperatures at 60°N (Mid Sweden) has reached 50-55°C from a sunny sky. On a standstill Earth, its thermal equator at ±0° latitude, we Might assume (well over boiling point) that all water in time would vaporize and be pushed onto the backside — as permanent very cold ice. The RIM between warm and cold air Might Even be situated below-behind the day side rim, on the backside, with this scenario:
• A thermodynamic temperature-pressure equilibrium situation has established with fix ditto on each fix region — an »air-push» from front to back due to the intense front heat, as a pressure pushing piston in a cylinder, with a permanent ice cover for all present Earth surface water on the backside, never — ever — vaporizing or even being reached by any direct Sunlight. No wind. No convective activity. No motion of air mass.
• A first possible motion of air mass would appear ONLY if the Earth begins to rotate — guaranteeing a COOLING property breaking all possible thermodynamic equilibrium states — certifying the existence of a permanently appearing wind system. THEN — first — air convection is also possible (especially at the warmest thermal equator region);
By math: Gas law equations define average gas molecular velocities by temperature and gas type; temperature differences between different air regions then define a maximum out leveling wind speed — in proportion to the Earth's rotational angular velocity — on a standstill nothing at all.
Along with centrifugal impressions (with Coriolis effects) on the most close ground air masses — pushing air from pole to equator on a slow speed high density base, generating a back-push equator-pole on high speed low density scale (BasicVortexPhysicsEaxmple) — the entire wind system mathematics would be exclusively defined and explained in any possible physical detail:
• Wind power is exclusively and unexceptionally generated, maintained and upheld by Earth's rotation.
Only if any of these statements and conclusions can
be proven faulty, the idea of wind exclusively from an Earth body rotation may
be dismissed. Searched for, none yet found (28Jul2022);
• Extracting wind power from Earth's wind system unexceptionally takes power from Earth's rotational energy.
•
Established state authority claims (SEM) of type ”Wind
energy has its origin in the sun” are gravely misleading, dis-informative,
based on generalized established unproven suppositions, and, as yet searched
for, with zero experimental provability.
— BUT WE WOULD BE VERY GLAD TO EXPERIENCE ONE SINGLE ARGUMENT POINTING OUT THAT SENTENCE TO BE (BADLY) FAULTY.
• Wind direction is legal: all wind power is based on Earth's rotational energy as so stated in the above related parts — and can be, or should be possible to be, explained in any detail by a corresponding basic simple, not complicated, Earth centrifugal Coriolis angular velocity mathematics — or not at all (says the thermodynamic equilibrium).
See a fully accounted set up two disc Coriolis mathematics (Coriolis’ first theorem ..) example in COR2.
EARTHWind FUNDAMENTALS:
2Jul2022 — Carbo ¦ WIND ¦ WindPROOF ¦ THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM ¦ WINDVortexPhysics ¦ TheBASIC
RelatedLiRaNo ¦ EnergyLAW ¦ WHACNE ¦ AllMathPHYSICS ¦ GroundWindSpeeds ¦ WINDVortexPhysics
¦ CentrifugalBASIC ¦ Coriolis’ 2 Theorems ¦ COR2 ¦ THEvCEN ¦ TheMAL
VINDBEGREPPET RELATERAT ¦ THERMODYNAMICAL
EQUILIBRIUM BASED STATEMENTS ONLY
RELATED PHYSICS RELATES THE FUNDAMENTALS OF WIND
POWER
Observation: Modern academy has ended
up as being ranked »last in class» — especially in
mathematics, no joke, says related physics. We study that, in detail.
— We leave no one behind — and
leave all doors open for any disclaiming instance: errors are not allowed here,
no way
Short:
IT ISN’T THE HEAT FROM THE SUN THAT MAKES WIND. IT
IS THE COOLING FROM
THE ROTATION OF THE EARTH OF AN IDEAL THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM THAT
FRAGMENTS ANY THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM — CONSTANTLY CREATING TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES
WITH ACCOMPANYING DIFFERENT PRESSURE GRADIENTS — FORCING THESE TO ENDLESSLY
CHASE THEIR OWN TAIL IN SEEKING EQUILIBRIUM: CREATION OF THE EARTH’S WIND POWER
ENGINE ENERGY WORKING MACHINE. THE SUN JUST HOLDS THAT INNER EARTH BOX WARM: the
Sun does not contribute on wind power on Earth — not one atom: say
Explanation in short — schematically illustrated, the theory based on a constant linear momentum wind mass vm:
———————————————
BasicVORTEX ¦ WindSPEEDS ¦ GROUND WIND-SPEEDS TABLE ¦ BASIC GLOBAL WIND REFERENCE TABLE
Earth rotation centrifugation pushes air mass (p=mv) pole-equator, creating the premise of a BasicVortexPhysics. The vortex surge sucks the push-back equator-pole on a differentiating equality foundation of type p=mv= m/n × vn=mn × v/n, where the Coriolis effect defines some specific divisions on the air flow mathematics.
RadiationBasics: EARTHWind FUNDAMENTALS ¦ AfterMATH
PlanckRadiation: RadiationBasics
Planck energy radiation —
E=hf
(as observed in formulating its mathematics through the general gas law equations — WindSpeedsJun2022):
Any standstill physical object illuminated by a constant heat source will — after some time from the last moment of change — establish a constant state of thermal equilibrium based on internally balanced different regions of temperature (inter atomic and inter molecular distances) between front and back:
• no motion of masses occur in the established state of the equilibrium. Heat just keeps flowing from warm to cold from front to back, supporting the different parts according to the body’s inner material properties:
— E = hf = mcr × f = mc²: input energy = output energy — there is no loss of heat — radiative Planck energy for generating friction between moving masses — between a heat source and whatever stands in its radiating way:
• Sun’s heat
on Earth — then by consequence — has — in itself — no wind energy generating
property: no here known such relatable thermodynamical physical nature exists
It is imperative that we
understand this basic physics — on zero doubt. So: what is the Argument
against?
• As long as a physical body is heated, it absorbs energy from the heating source (a material’s heat capacity property, different for different material). When the heating procedure is finished and the body reaches a state of thermal equilibrium, no more heat energy is absorbed by the body: It then begins to radiate back out exactly the received quantity source energy (that it consumed on its warming up) with zero losses: no frictional losses whatsoever.
It is the same condition as the one stated in a THERMODYNAMICAL
EQUILIBRIUM: no move.
Say again.
BasicWindReference: EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS
Jul2022 PRESENT BASIC:
f (ω):
———————————————————————————————
• THE CENTRIFUGAL AIR GAS MASS PUSH
p = mv............ general average ¦ quantity based on ARCHER2012¦HUANG2014 references
mv = m/n × vn = mn × v/n ¦ See WindMassCalculation and WindSpeeds.
— Based on some rough first wind power measurement data from Archer2012¦Huang2014 we have a first (primitive) wind mass value of roughly
mv = 1 T16 KG(M/S) with a nominal lowest
v = 0.17 M/S on a corresponding nominal highest wind mass
m = 6.7 T16 KG or roughly 1.25% of Earth’s total atmospheric mass.
in a function of Earth’s angular velocity [f (ω=2π/t)].
As any combination is allowed with this mv product
mv = m/n × vn = mn × v/n
all possible values at all possible locations should — by principle — be incorporated.
— That is: the practical m and v-part values are apparently not to be understood as the above given nominal m and v values: The practical m and v values can be — or should so be — of any observed magnitude;
———————————————————————————————
IN GENERAL:
POLAR-EQUATOR close ground high mass low speed matches (cancels) the return
EQUATOR-POLAR high ground low mass high speed air:
flow out = flow in — the sum is
zero, or should so be zero:
• even by a practical physical latitudinal equivalent region
(unless we are mistaken):
— the Ferrel Cell: maximum
Coriolis acceleration. See illustrated with math definitions in CoriolisMaximum:
MaxNearEarthSurfaceCorioilsAccelerationωvr@45°Latitude ¦ ON±15° with a net ±zero out-in air flow
for partly projective and partly seasonal deviations — see TheBASIC
(But that suggested partition
has here no more deeper related connection or description, yet).
———————————————————————————————
(ω=0) = (p=0)
General global wind speed
reference — Northern Hemisphere
GLOBAL WIND MAP — FM1975s514
———————————————————————————————
The global average taken on
altitudes 0-100 KM Summer-Winter on North hemisphere shows:
averaged wind speed: 15 M/S from West to East:
Wind Speed
Table in M/S — compiled from the FM1975 source’s illustrated West-East
wind components specifications on 0-100KM altitudes and latitudes 0-90 for
Northern Hemisphere conditions.
Positive vales denote Westerly winds (blowing from
West to East), negative values Easterlies.
— A corresponding comparing chart @Internet Jul2022
has been searched for but not found.
SPECIAL NOTE ON A CONTINUED FREE SCIENTIFIC ACCESS
OF SUCH LITERATURE ON INTERNET
After 2018:
• previously free and open science information has increasingly been blocked with demands of consenting on cookies unless a continued denied information access will prevail. Not one word HumanRight mentioned.
Such apparently — apparently on Drift, not plan —
HumanRight hostile increasing Internet Sites have no connection to
presentations in UH: we just dismiss these here:
— instances ignoring recognition of HumanRight have no — zero — value to humanity (A27.1 UDHR10Dec1948):
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and
inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world,
ALL OTHER CLAIMS APPARENTLY DEFINE FASCISTIC OPPRESSION, PROCLAIMED OR NOT:
not-freedom, not-justice, not-peace. Pick one.
Say again. Come again. Have your say. Claim whatever you want: HumanRight is a Knowledge Domain.
— Turning ones back on it, and there it is: exercising oppression. Say again. No special proclamation needed.
Reminding:
HumanRight is not a construction. It is natural
recognition: gravitation and electricity: life — especially and apparently
sensed well by children — and animals.
cookies is not a substitute for HumanRight Recognition — scientific, social and cultural development — never was. Never will be. Stop killing humanity.
WindMassCalculation: mv-values — the total Earth atmospheric wind
mass product involved in the entire Earth’s atmospheric cyclic circulation ¦ TheBASIC ¦
TheMAL
¦ THERMODYNAMICal EQUILIBRIUM
¦ RelatedLiRaNo
THE WIND MASS p=mv CALCULATION
Simplified schematic of the
centrifugation push fundamentals
— also compare the
fundamentals of centrifugation in
Newton’s famous vessel experiment —
basics of understanding rotation physics
unless already familiar
The Vortex Physics Experiment:
EXAMINING THE PROVING OF THE CENTRIFUGAL WIND-PUSH
THEORY
Exemplified On The Northern Hemisphere — compilation 25Jul2022
TEST LEVEL 1 — text sum
Simplified denotations: T ¦ t for 10^± : EX .. T15 = 1000
Tera = 1 Penta
———————
• Equally amounts of Wind-Mass — linear momentum p=mv — travels cyclic pole-equator-pole:
p = mv = m/n × vn = mn × v/n — all possible ranges apply;
Ekin = mv²/2 = pv/2; v² = 2E/m
• Roughly calculated amount of air defining the amount of wind mass from Archer2012:
Archer2012 data at 100 M altitude 1700 TW = 1.7 T15 W = 1.7 T15 J/S ; E = 1.7 T15 J = mv²/2:
(Huang2014: Hadley cell 198 TW; Ferrel cell 275 TW;
” The Ferrel system acts as a heat pump with a
coefficient of performance 12.1, consuming kinetic energy at an approximate
rate of 275 TW, exceeding the power production of the Hadley system by 77 TW.”,
” The Polar meridional cell is to weak to allow its contribution
.. Its contribution is unlikely to significantly offset the net sink attributed
here to the combination of the Hadley and Ferrel systems.”,
Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation [Ref.3, Huang2014]
Jul2022; summing 4.73 TW = 0.473 T15 W)
Involved air mass taken on an average air density 1.3 KG/M² over a 5.11 T14 flat Earth surface:
m = 6.7 T16 KG — with a rough mJatm = 5.3 T18 KG total Earth atmospheric mass:
roughly m/mJatm = 1.25%;
v(Archer2012) = √ 2E/m = ..... 0.2262 M/S average nominal minimum over m; mv = 1.503 T16 KG(M/S)
v(Huang2014) = √ 2E/m = ..... 0.1193 M/S average nominal minimum over m; mv = 7.929 T15 KG(M/S)
mean: ....................................... 0.173 M/S ¦ Pole-Equator in 1.8 years
THE CORIOLIS EFFECT SUGGESTS THIS MINOR CENTRIFUGALLY POLE-EQUATOR PUSHED AIR MASS DEVIATES WESTWARD;
• IF the p = mv = m/n × vn = mn × v/n — all possible ranges apply — holds, a corresponding average maximum nominal global wind speed could — or should — be calculated from
m/n × vn = mn × v/n as
(m/n)/(mn) = (v/n)/(vn) = ........ 1.25%; THEN:
maxARCHER(vn) : (vn) = (v/n)/1.25% = 0.2262/1.25% = 18.040 M/S
maxHUANG(vn) : (vn) = (v/n)/1.25% = 0.2262/1.25% = 9.516 M/S
mean: ....................................... 13.778 M/S
THE CORIOLIS EFFECT SUGGESTS AN EASTWARD DEVIATION OF THAT RETURNED EQUATOR-POLE SUCKED AIR MASS;
• FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 side514 has an illustrated altitude/latitude northern hemisphere summer/winter accounted map (collected research data up to the 1970s) with east-west (E, W) wind speed components for each of the posts. The values are spread out from -50(E) to 80(W).
ComparingResults: BasicStructure
COMPARING RESULTS:
Entering these data into a spreadsheet and taking their average, we arrive at the figure:
FM1975: ................................. 15.100 M/S — EASTWARD (Westerlies, W).
Comparing the recently arrived results (Archer2012, Huang2014):
Archer2012¦Huang2014
mean: ....................................... 13.778 M/S
——————————————————
mean correspondence: ............ 91.24%
With wind values spread over an interval of 130 M/S, this roughly calculated result is apparently a very good one.
• Based on these first results, no direct threat claiming the Centrifugal Wind Push Theory as faulty exists:
As concluded — but still with no present established scientific
representation:
• The wind system cannot be explained on an insolation (»self heat convective») theory alone. No way.
Schematic
Overview 25Jul2022:
Schematic Flowchart for
Earth’s weather (troposphere) system circulations, according to established
consensus — on specifications from Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation
24Jul2022, and some here added markers from the Centrifugal/Coriolis math.
We should keep in mind the
following scale properties, as illustrated by the figure above. With an Earth equator
radius of 6 378 KM — here 638 pixels, each pixel 10 KM — the troposphere (the
top troposphere at ca 10 KM) represents just the very top thin skin of a Tomato
resembling the size of the Earth: a very thin small narrow channel. Meaning,
foremost: take care on large scale business: »don’t kill the mailman».
INSOLATION ACCOMPLISHES NO COOLING EFFECT.
BUT EARTH’S ROTATIONS DOES PRECISELY THAT.
SO THAT WIND can GENERATE through TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
ON BASIC GAS LAW MATHEMATICS.
from an elementary centrifugal
Coriolis push physics
WindProof: 15Jul2022 — EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS ¦ THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM
Our
way of relating things in physics and mathematics:
• First comes rotation (J=mvr, angular momentum, most famous as
Planck’s constant h=mcr, The Neutron
by quantities):
• Rotation explains convection — symmetric —
rotating — rotations (including integrated electro-magnetic features):
• Convection — no mother god loving way —
precedes rotation:
• Rotation it is that precedes convection:
• No stand still thermal equilibrium can
generate a mechanical friction. No physical principal principle way.
— But the door is always open for
anyone who can clarify the situation in a (still) more related way.
AS BASED ON THE STATEMENT IN THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM
THE simple WIND PROOF
The Expansion-Rotation
principle
EXPANSION — centrifugal forcing —
is always accompanied by a rotation (convection or advection).
• As we know: there is no exception whatsoever from that as a principle in physics.
Independent laboratory experiments on Earth cannot eliminate the influence from Earth’s rotational aspect. So we are directed only to rely on known physics in the following.
Interpreting the
result with no Earth rotation — with preserved constant insolation:
— All surface
water becomes ice. Theory scenery:
— Insolation
heat transfer passes through the front hot thin air towards the back,
maintaining a constant heat pressure front side barrier, pushing on the
planet’s back atmosphere. As its temperature falls [far below zero °C]
behind the day-night rim circle, all ground and air water is forced to the back
into a state of ground based permanent ice.
As no rotational atmospheric mixing force
exists, neither does any possible change of that established thermal
equilibrium: No wind can exist. Only rotation energy can generate wind: cooling
and pushing already warmed, thereby generating temperature differences [pV=kT; p=T·k/V],
generating wind. The constant heat itself from the Sun cannot accomplish such
physics, as we know.
A resembling theoretical
case with a closed air box with a vertically mounted heat lamp with a constant
heat flow on top above it should give the same principal result, as we know: A
thermal equilibrium establishes inside the box with absolutely no internal gas
moves. The equilibrium is established by different average velocities among the
local gas molecules v = √ 3TR/U
— faster and warmer and less dense with higher pressure at the top, slower and colder
and more dense with lower pressure at the bottom [p=kT/V]. No wind.
• Heat flow as such is not a wind energy
generator. No such here known physics exists. Feel free to object on any
related argument. Searched for. None yet found.
If we hence remove all rotational aspects from the physical Earth, only by purpose of examining the remaining actual heat delivered by the Sun as a constant heat source, the mentioned principle apparently points out that also all types of expansion (convection and advection) will be removed. In other shorter words: no wind. No circulation. No mixing of air gases with different gradients of pressure and temperature. Just a solid stable thermodynamic equilibrium with a fixed state of these values spread over the actual regions with zero change.
(Any arguing explanation proving the statements to be wrong are most welcome).
RESULT — disclaim it, anyone who can: argument
searched for, none yet found:
Subtropical
Ridges nomenclature — see Wikipedia (2Jun2022): ”Characterized by sunny skies, calm
winds, and very little precipitation.”.
• No (here known) mathematical physics exists with which WIND ON EARTH can be explained as originating from the Sun as a constant heat source by itself only.
— No math expression at all. Nothing.
• All wind power on Earth is generated and maintained or can so be explained and related in detail by Earth’s rotation — which slowly decreases due to frictional losses (both below the crust and above [the 2003 NASA Earth Wind article] ¦ also MoonTide).
• The Sun has no part in wind generation: not one atom, apparently says the expansion-rotation principle as related in THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM.
• The Sun then apparently only works as a heat source with a constant refill on any cooling changes caused by the rotation in local distribution of pressure and temperature.
• Wind speeds (for known gases) are then again basically determined their minima and maxima by formula in the general gas law: differences in atmospheric pressure — caused by Earth’s rotation:
centrifugation fragmentation breaks any thermal equilibrium with a gas-push pole-equator, establishing a strife for thermal equilibrium restoration, which never happens, returning the pole-equator pushed air back to the poles — along with Coriolis effects.
• Apparently there is a total (global average over given periods) maximum wind power — linear momentum p=mv — involving a total amount of atmospheric mass (v) and speed determined by the actual global average temperature differences (for given gases):
• p = mv = mn · v/n = m/n · vn :
— On the same wind-mass constant mv random wind speeds with random air masses can, and do, appear according to the different distributions of pressure and temperature accomplished and maintained by the Earth´s rotation.
• The wind linear momentum p=mv is preserved over shorter time periods, slowly decreasing over long time periods as the Earth’s rotation (very) slowly decreases.
• As no
wind — expansion: convection and advection — can be generated without rotation,
as recently concluded, the wind direction on Earth is not imperative:
all wind power on Earth is related to and falls back on Earth’s rotation —
independent of, including, the direction of the wind at any place and time.
See further simple related proofs in All Math Physics.
SUMMATION
The bottom line of our present situation would be the details as compiled in the illustration below — how the wind system appears on Earth given a global constant average surface temperature of some 15°C :
———————————————
Continue on All Math Physics. TheWINDproof.
AllMathPHYSICS: Coriolis’ 2 Theorems ¦ EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS
¦ THERMAL EQUILIBRIUM ¦
The
simple wind proof ¦
TheMAL
¦ TheBASIC
Related Earth surface wind power energy mathematical physics — PREFIXxSIN
ALL MATH PHYSICS — FROM EARTH’S ROTATION
p = mv = m/n · vn = mn · v/n — Earth’s (over shorter periods of geological time) constant linear momentum wind mass property
As related from TheBASIC: None of these simple basic WIND MATHEMATICS can be related to the origin of insolation heat from our Sun.
What we know (Jul2022):
Although it is frequently so stated in every established available text
’the Sun as the origin of WIND power energy on Earth’, (SEM)
• no here known mathematical physics exists
— searched for, none yet found
— in advocating the Sun as the origin of WIND power energy on Earth:
A Suggested Lead: INTERNET SEARCH 28Jul2022 :
1 — ”Proof that wind on Earth is generated by the Sun”:
” There are no results for ”Proof that wind on Earth is generated by the Sun” ”
2 — ”Proving the Sun as a generator of Earth’s winds”:
” There are no results for ”Proving the Sun as a generator of Earth’s winds” ”
• The morphology of WIND, the general domain of WIND with its structures and zones, as originating from the Sun: no yet found mathematics. None found. Searching ..
— Because when we consult Rotation as the origin of
wind on Earth, the mathematics begins gushing:
COOLING: AllMATH
COOLING — a property Sun has not: Earth’s rotation —
of an ideal thermal equilibrium[‡] generates different temperature and
pressure gradients. These differences define limits on wind speeds[‡]
through the basic gas laws that the broken equilibriums aspire to restore, which
never happens — guaranteed by rotation’s constant equilibrium fragmentation.
T = [T(n→∞)]/(n→∞)
= [T/(n→∞)](n→∞): for a given average
temperature (T), any cooling(Wind) combination of higher-lower-higher(wind
speed v = (√ 3R/U)(√T1–√T2)) is allowed on the same
preserved average T(Sun). T is just warming the box, while the temperature
differences generate the wind inside of the box — T1–T2
from a constant rotational thermal-equilibrium fragmentation, as suggested by
the centrifugation wind mass p=mv
basics (EARTHWind FUNDAMENTALS). With a reduced rotation,
the thermally fragmenting engine also weakens, and the wind speed — the
friction aspect between solid ground and the air above — ceases proportionally.
In other words by consequence:
• Increased
friction — wind poles — reduces Earth’s rotation ([The2003NASAarticle]
¦ Do the math : 600GWexample).
The WIND FROM ROTATION
ARGUMENT ¦ WINDPOWER ON EARTH
— Where is the world academic
intelligence and its capability in sorting the issue out, once and for all?
Please do share. Searched for. None yet found. Search continues ..
• Is the world wind power technology anything else than a global
business gimmick, with further contribution to a future destruction of Earth’s
natural environment?
THE
MOST SIMPLE WIND PROOF — the friction
agent — a very strong
argument in physics:
• Wind is friction — rotating solid Earth ground meets above floating lying air (The NASA-article: wind affects
Earth rotation).
• Earth's wind mass vm — constant over
shorter time periods — defines a constant linear momentum wind mass
p
= mv = m/n · vn = mn · v/n, all possible relations;
• In time any physical friction will finish —
cease on v — on a given primary left-on-its-own rotation: it stops in due time.
• Then it is: WIND CAUSES EARTH ROTATIONAL
REDUCTION (in due time) — inevitably and unequivocally impossible to discard
from practical physics: the v in p=mv slowly is approaching a zero. And?
• The Sun apparently by physical principle
has no Earth physical rotational-restoring connection. No way.
—
Meaning:
• Once a taken reduced wind mass mv, it is lost for ever.
E
= Fd = m(v1)²/2 – m(v2)²/2 = m([v1]² – [v2]²)/2 — same as the 1832 Coriolis’
First Theorem :
• Energy — = Work = Force (F) over distance
(d) — is taken from wind (v) on a given mass — on the credit of the friction
aspect, and its corresponding generated heat (the actual kinetic energy Fd)
loss.
— AIR FRICTION: motionally restraining amount of atomic or
molecular attack on a solid surface.
• And the Coriolis effect definitely comes not from the Sun, but
from centrifugation (TheBASIC): the ultimate
wind generator, as it then may be understood
— unless so disclaimed.
Our
Sun (compare: PopularOBJECTION) has absolutely no
physical capacity in restoring an already wind power extracted quantity that
was taken down BY WIND POLES to Earth ground from the above lying frictious
air.
—
Meaning: Anyway we count and reckon on it, extracting wind power from Earth's
wind system inevitably reduces Earth's wind system linear momentum — and the
Sun itself cannot restore that loss. No physical mathematical way.
Bottom line:
—
Extracting
wind power from Earth's wind system reduces Earth's rotation — significantly if taken in significant quantities over
significant periods of time. See The600GWexample:
Attacking Earth’s Environment.
PopularObjection: Cooling
In short then — but ..
Wind speed is generated from a breach in thermal
equilibrium, temperature differences T1–T2: repeated cooling from
Earth’s rotation followed by repeated thermal restoration — a gas (inertial)
property. Not a Sun feature. Wind speed is so generated from Earth rotation.
Not from temperature — insolation — as such.
—
Why then is The Population still arguing on that
one? What’sUp? TEST ANSWER:
—
Because everybody already knows that HEAT (from whatever) affects temperature
differences, causing a turbulent air region (while
in fact it isn’t the Sun heating but the Earth’s rotation cooling) —
however as if Earth »has no rotation at all». Or, that »the influence of
Earth’s rotation is discernibly small in wind matters» (a claimed math still
searched for). OBLIVION. Possibly.
Ignoring Earth’s rotation — centrifugation
on gravity-attracting close-ground existent air masses — means ignoring the
actual friction agent: wind. And the circular argumentation again claims IT IS
THE SUN WHICH UPHOLDS what we frictionally really ignore as WIND. Bottom line:
There
is no available isolated mathematics connecting insolation to Earth ground
WIND. Searched for. None yet found.
• The releasing Question would be: How would you convince us that present insolation on a
Stand Still Earth generates mechanically measurable FRICTION — wind? Please
share. Compare The simple Wind proof — STANFORD.
Artificial extraction of wind from gaseous air to solid
Earth ground then inevitably means a reduction in the natural environmental
Earth’s linear wind mass momentum p=mv. Our Sun has no physical
connected property to restore that loss, as little as our Sun promotes Earth
rotation: Once a taken reduced
wind mass mv, it is lost for ever. Earth’s rotation reduces
proportionally.
— And the world IPCC/State governments seem unable
to understand that concept — or have decided to give it a shit: No such or
other imperative information to humanity. Not a sound.
— Only on that foundation: What we know:
• Only Earth rotational mathematical physics — rotation/cooling and centrifugation/Coriolis — can give a fully detailed picture of the Earth’s wind systems — based on a global providing constant average Earth surface temperature of some 15°C as constantly delivered by our Sun: the only insolated provision.
THE DISTRIBUTION OF CENTRIFUGATION AND its related CORIOLIS ACCELERATION FROM EARTH’S ROTATION — PREFIXxSIN:
As in The WindProof
The Earth’s centrifugal vector properties (CENTRIFUGAL BASIC) — Earth’s rotation, not the Sun — apparently define the already well known different regions of the Earth’s wind and weather zones. And it is, again, apparently all described, related, verified and explained — in to the last atom, or not at all — by the rotational properties in Earth’s own rotation.
GroundWindSpeeds: AllMathPHYSICS
Ground wind speeds
Wind speeds on a maximum range are theoretically most easily calculated based on surface measured temperature differences (T1–T2) from the General Gas Law equations. Some of these results are given below ().
v = (v1 = √ 3T1R/U) – (v2 = √ 3T2R/U) = (√T1·√ 3R/U) – (√T2 ·√ 3R/U)
= (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2) — General gas law equations:
v = (√ 3R/U)(√T1–√T2)
R general gas constant ¦ 8314.9148 J/[KG°K]
U atomic/molecular weight of a specific
gas composition in Dalton [atomic mass] units ¦ O2Oxygen16: U = 32 ; N2Nitrogen14 : U = 28, rounded
T temperature in °K
30Jun2022 — THE WIND VELOCITY gas pressure differences DRIVING CHART
BASICS
U=32 for Oxygen, U=28 for Nitrogen
Result from some
Internet sampled global average temperature values in different sources, see WindSPEEDS and CaribbeanTradeWINDS [7-10 M/S].
— The difference
in internal molecular average gas velocity between specific gas regions defines
the absolute maximum generated available wind speed when the gases aspire to establish
a zero mutual pressure difference.
— The FOCUS MATERIEN 1975
p514 wind chart accounts for summer-winter average NORTH
HEMISPHERE wind speeds on altitudes 0-100 KM from 5 to 80 M/S, as a rough
comparison.
Additional mathematics (apparently)
explains additional (possibly very high) wind speeds on higher altitudes when
warmer air rises on narrower volumes [with preserved density] (a reported 800
M/S 300 KM high up north, FM1975s513sp2m)
— with ability to reverse direction at midnight (!) (CoriolisRefUH2019).
The total available wind energy then can be calculated
E = mv2/2 = m[(√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)]2/2; NO particular SUN:
E = (3mR/U)[T1+T2
– 2√T1T2]/2
” Wind results from the movement of air due to atmospheric pressure gradients”,
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022
• Absolutely.
At present (Jul2022, from Archer2012 ¦ Archer2012Ref) we have no other measured quantity to rely on for a further test than the value ”1700 TW of wind power at an altitude of 100 metres over land and sea”. 1 Tera = T12;
• That is a basic 1.7 T15 W = 1.7 T15 J/S — possibly representing the total amount of available energy associated with our idea of Earth’s rotation as the cause of all wind on Earth.
That is indeed a very low quantity if spread equally over the Earth’s surface for calculating a mean average involved mass (m) over some least possible air thickness. Very low:
Archer2012Ref ¦ 100 M altitude:
mAVERAGED = 6.65 T16
KG ¦ v² = 2E/m:
(some 1% of the
total Earth’s atmospheric
mass, 5.3 T18 KG ¦ TepRESULT2021
¦ M0calc;
vAVERAGED = 0.2262 M/S — possibly to small to measure on a global avergae scale.
One way to interpret this small quantity averaged result — if at all relevant to the measured expedition (the detailed information is limited in this reference) — is that WIND on Earth mainly is »a shared resource»:
— It does not appear constantly everywhere all the time.
• Mostly, as experienced (before 2000) there is practically no wind at all — inside a StateWeCutEnterprise untouched nature forest — as experienced when such still existed some several decades ago (in Sweden).
TheWINDVortexPhysics: GroundWindSpeeds
¦ VindbegreppetRELATERAT
THE WIND VORTEX PHYSICS:
GRAVITY — CENTRIFUGAL FORCE
—
GENERATES THE VORTEX. NOT HEAT FROM THE SUN
— What causes the whirling structures in Earth’s wind systems?
TheBASIC gives and introduces the simple relational foundation — originally from Newton’s 3.
As in a sink (bathroom trough) when pouring a bucket of water into it, the sucking force from below creates a narrow channel of rotating and down spiraling water — a vortex — the exact same physics should also apply for the Earth’s atmospheric (semi-solid) gas fluid (humid air) — if sucked down:
• As we know: The Sun has no part in this administration (Do you see any?):
From a theoretical thermal equilibrium (we cannot test that one with our Earth), with zero atmospheric push, there is, what we know, no physical way to relate a sucking vortex build up. The only way for a pole (coldest) to experience such a down suck is if a corresponding centrifugal gas push is directed towards the equator — as the sink bottom (pole) responds to the push.
CentrifugalBASIC: WINDVortexPhysics
With the (The BASIC) so related and (on Newton’s 3:rd) deduced Coriolis effect — material semi-solid centrifugal effect — all vortex phenomena can be explained, or should so possible be explained, as generated by the Earth’s rotational centrifugal action.
• The Sun has no mathematical part in this Earth Wind mathematical physics. No way.
: differential summing results
..
→ → → ¦ = →
¦
→ → ¦
Depending on situation — pressure and temperature condition — differentially related rotational resultants apparently have a several-way mathematics to form a vortex:
Featuring [multiple] mounted wheels
on the same Earth solid tap ..
If separation walls (pressure) between different air layers exist, the Coriolis effect as such may very well (in mathematical principle and in practice) build separately concentric oppositely rotating vortices, leveling out the temperature and pressure differences. And, hence, approaching a restoration situation of thermal equilibrium — which never happens as certified by the fragmenting rotational centrifugation.
A vortex builds up, reaches
its maximum, then dies out — and another forms ..
The simplest example is a single such Coriolis vortex basic disc on which to relate a vertically top-down whirling wind stream — as in our simple bathroom experiment (VortexPhysics).
Below (COR2) follows a general mathematical account on credit of the basic relatable (deeply explainable) Coriolis complex situations by detailed examples.
• We study the potential — in a solid disc material, not any direct actual semi-solid weather system air gas practice — Coriolis effect’s different parameters and their mathematical expressibility by detail.
• That is: What we apparently need to know in understanding the Earth’s wind complex — for further mathematical and physical reference argumentation — on the origin of WIND on Earth. ¦ VortexPhysics.
COR2: 13Jul2022 — THE CORIOLIS EFFECT
COR2
All reckoning results in Tabell4 Coriolis2022.ods
“ Since the Coriolis force is always
directed
perpendicular to the movement of a
body, it can only
change its direction, not its speed and
kinetic energy:
it does no work.”, Persson1998p1379col1bottom
Compare
corrected — only added words, none removed — as proven by the set up COR2
example in this presentation, in full concord with Coriolis' first theorem:
Since the Coriolis force is always
directed
perpendicular to the CENTRIFUGAL-LINE (cenLINE)
PROJECTED movement VELOCITY (vCEN) of a SEMI-SOLID ROTATIONALLY MASS
MOTIONAL CONNECTED body (CoriolisAnalogies),
it can NOT only
change its direction, not ONLY BUT ALSO
its speed and kinetic energy:
it does no work BUT TAKES WORK FROM THE
FRICTION CONNECTED TO THE CHANGE OF STATE, AND THEREBY CONTRIBUTES TO THE
ROTATIONAL REDUCTION — IF THE ROTATION IS LEFT ON ITS OWN —
Coriolis' first theorem:
kinetic energy conversion.
In case of our Earth and its semi-solid Earth ground connected wind
system, the rotational reduction is discernible over shorter time periods. And
we (therefore) treat the mathematical physics ideally as with no losses at all.
Coriolis’ two theorems — basic
elementary related math — the COR2 set up reckoning example
THE CORIOLIS vortex COMPLEX BY DETAILED
EXAMPLE
We relate two rotating discs:
• Disc2 is mounted (or mainly follows) on Disc1
— as in a machine hall with Disk2 mounted on Disc1 with a tap distance d0
— as on the Sun-Earth-Line — as Disc1 — with Earth as Disk2 mounted/rotating far out on Disc1 with a tap distance 1AU = d0
— as with Earth by Disc1 (axially projected as a flat disc) with Earth’s humid atmosphere, featuring some local rotating air- or cloud mass by an ideal Disc2 with a tap distance d0
Left: Disc2¦top
rotates anticlockwise, same as Disc1¦bottom. Disc1 features the Earth’s
rotation. Right: Disc2 rotates clockwise, opposed to Disc1.
Disc2 — its
solid, not mobile point mass m — features a semi-solid mass part of Disc1
traveling to and fro relative the common rotational origo center O — Earth’s
axis. If also m is mobile, additional featuring Coriolis effects is added.
We note — from these TheBASIC thorough
deductions — that
• The sloping
angle E° of the resulting centrifugal line vCEN in PREFIXxSIN
tanE° = cosA/(sinA+d0–C0)
only depends on
— with Earth north hemisphere wind vortex examples — 1. an ideal fix distance d0 between pole
and the ideal vortex center tap, and 2. the angular rotational velocities of
the two rotating agents, Earth [ω] and the vortex disc [ω0], and 3. the
mass point m:s rotational angle [A°], all connected to a fix point [C0] between the two
rotating discs’ center taps [d0].
THIS IS CRUCIAL:
• It
apparently means in explicit that vortex disc contractions or expansions does NOT affect the vCEN E° value.
Because the only way to relate a STATE condition with a
determined rotational angle A in a s specific moment of time [integrally dt]
inevitably must include the same contemporaneous m-POSITION on an eventual
additional Contractive or Expansive motional direction [vCE]: vCE cannot be
separated from the actual m-point position. Hence: The E°vCEN stays put. vCE
must be added separately FROM the given m-position ON the given E°vCEN through
the given m-angle A. Otherwise physics is apparently violated.
If such
additional movements occur, and they do, an additional Vortex Determined
Coriolis acceleration — so apparently — will be added to the already determined
Coriolis resultant of the two fix tap d0 distanced rotating disks. See further
below exemplified in FinalCORIOLIS.
As also the final velocity resultant of the
moving particle [m] or gas region will be altered on an additional vortex
contraction or expansion, the final end picture will have no here known
connection to an ideal [established
text books] that the Coriolis resultant is always PERPENDICULAR
to the tangent of the resulting motional direction of the m-point [the actual local wind direction; FM1975ill.s502
¦ Persson1998
¦ Persson2005 ¦ CoriolisWikipedia2012 ¦ WikipediaCoriolis2012
¦ Q5].
The more correct and precise formulation related
to TheBASIC
— hence — is: The Coriolis acceleration/force direction is always perpendicular
toTHE PROJECTED
v-RESULTANT — not the v-resultant as such — on the resulting centrifugal vCENT
line. Meaning: The resulting v-direction and Coriolis effect direction are NOT
each others normals, unless occasionally so by accident.
However, there is also another issue worth
mentioning on calculating the resulting velocity-wind part’s direction: Because
TheBASIC
demands that its Coriolis effect — the change v0 in motional
magnitude ALONG
THE [resulting] CENTRIFUGAL LINE — unequivocally with no exception must be
taken from a resulting
velocity direction and magnitude, the actual additional vortex expansive or
contractive velocity part must be included in the total vector velocity
resultant [of
course]. Then the actual corresponding Coriolis acceleration can be
calculated from the resulting v-projection on the vCEN line.
Also another issue is worth mentioning: the
actual idea of a Coriolis FORCE:
• Because
(Earth-wind
analogies) centrifugation pushes gas from pole to equator [WindVortexPhysics],
the Coriolis effect apparently only accomplishes a morphological — formative —
change on that deflecting route. The ENERGY behind that change — the actual
Coriolis force [m·aCOR]
— is apparently taken from a [very small] corresponding reduction in the Earth’s
centrifugation rotational
energy. Meaning: The issue is frictional — unless the rotating discs are
monitored by some constant rotational machinery, which is not the Earth’s case.
The centrifugation process with the Coriolis force apparently takes — collects — inertia from
the friction property between Earth solid ground and the above semi-solid
fluid. So, in a short summation, the Coriolis force — the centrifugation
process of air pole-equator — DEFINES an Earth rotational angular reducing
process: Earth slows down by the very air friction in the weather systems [see also that point in The 2003NASA Article — the spinning
Earth is affected by winds]:
• COLLECTING that natural Earth rotational energy
reduction down to Earth ground based machinery also removes — reduces: disturbs, destructs, corrupts
— the Earth wind system’s natural machinery [of course]. And by consequence: such a scenario
inevitably accomplishes a reduction in Earth’s rotation — if established in any
larger quantity and during any longer period of time. See calculating examples
on The600GWexample.
GANVEC: COR2
ALL RELATED FROM THE
SIMPLE BASIC — Coriolis effect vector basics — basic Galilei-Newton
mechanics
GENERAL ANGLE AND VECTOR CURVES in COR2
As EXEMPLIFIED; C0 = 0.3 = 1.5/(1+1/2²=5)
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
The mathematics of the different parts is further explained
below in the text on specific sections.
• »The THING» with the C0-constant was observed like this: The Persson1998FIG.7
description on the 1835 Gaspard Coriolis’ second theorem suggests that ”.. which for a stationary body is
radially out from the center of rotation. For a moving body this is not the
case; it will point off from the center of rotation.”. In so arranging a
two disc vector and angle rotating complex for a thorough calculating test on
the stated, the quote was verified — with the addition as follows: No matter
the different m-velocity
positions and the resulting values, one and the same C0 showed up independently. Then the C0 was deduced — as compiled
in the above illustration — from a simple substitution on a rotational
acceleration equality basis, a = d/t², as accounted for in the Radial
alternative in RelatedLiRaNo.
The m-body velocity push on cenLINE:
• The bottom line is, with a given tap distance d0 and angular
rotations: Along the cenLINE with its fixed C0 point a final m-velocity resultant’s v[R] PROJECTION v[r] on that centrifugation
line will define — as
advised in TheBASIC from the 1832 Coriolis’
first theorem — the final Coriolis effect velocity triggering
measure AND weather the Coriolis acceleration and force will be directed either
way in or out of the two possible. And there is no perpendicularity at all between that cenLINE
and the resultant m-velocity v[R]. See the two possible CoriolisAnalogies
below.
— However in meteorological
texts — wind system [general momentarily two
disc rotating systems] descriptions on the Coriolis part — it is [often]
stated that [translated] FM1975p502
”The Coriolis force .. is always directed perpendicular to the direction of the
wind”. As calculated on resultants in this two disc test complex: [often]
close, yes. But not exactly. No such physical connection exists.
RESULTS by PREFIXxSIN:
K° = 180 – (A° – acos[r0cosA°/r])
v(R) = √ ωr(ωr)0[(ωr)0/ωr + ωr/(ωr)0 – 2sinK°] resulting velocity vector
v(r) = v(R)sin(D°+90°
+ V° – E°) ¦ v(R)-projection on aC cenLINE defines the
actual Coriolis velocity affected centrifugation velocity
v(r) = vC = vCEN
—— whether vCEN is directed towards the
C0-centrifugation center reference [down], or away from it [up]
also determines the direction of the Coriolis effect — as
deduced in TheBASIC — in accordance with Gaspard
Coriolis’ first theorem 1832
The actual resulting Coriolis
vector angular directions — the F° curves
Rearranging the curve-forms in a more meaningful-explaining sense — resulting Coriolis complex overview:
• We »absolutize» some parts of the curve graphs — here the F°aCOR angle signs — so they more morphologically fit the actual visual vector aCOR M/S² representations on the actual (vortex) discs:
CoriolisAnalogies: GANVEC
Note the different practical Coriolis
kinetic energy E=mv²/2 transfers — no kinematics (see CoriolisCINEMA) —
analogies with the two discs in example (TheBaseCoriolisAnalogies):
• Earth’s humid air mass systems pushed by Earth’s centrifugation (BasicVORTEXphysics);
• A direct mechanical two-disc system with one mounted on the other — as a cyclone rotates on the rotating Earth;
• The faster Earth rotation on the much slower Sun-Earth rotating arm;
• The axially distance-mounted ball bearings (Disc2) on a rotating crankshaft (Disc1) _—¯— ..
THEvCEN: COR2
THE RESULTING CENTRIFUGAL LINE cenLINE
WITH THE VECTOR PROJECTED CORIOLIS-EFFECT DEFINING
RESULTATNT vCEN
PREFIXxSIN:
Sum of angles in any plane triangle is 180° (CircleBasics) ¦ 
—————————————————————————————————————————
sinA = –√ 0.2 = sin(B+90°) = – sinB = – e/b = – 2/(√ 2²+4² = 20) = – 1/(√ 20/4) = – √ 2/10 ;
d/b = sinB, = – sinA = sin(B+90°) ; d = – sinA · b ;
d/c = cosF ; d = cosF · c ;
–e/b = sinA ¦ A = 0-360° ¦ sinA = sin(–A) ¦ sin(180–A) = sin(A–180) ¦ ; e/b = – sinA ; e = –sinA · b ;
c2 = (a + e)2 + d2 = a2 + 2ae + [e2=b2–d2] + d2 = a2 + 2ae + b2 = a2 + 2ae + b2 = a2 + b2 – 2a · sinA · b ;
c2 = a2 + b2 – ab · 2sinA = ab(a2/ab + b2/ab – 2sinA) = ab(a/b + b/a – 2sinA) ;
c = √ ab(a/b + b/a –
2sinA) related
vector calculating resultants
—————————————————————————————————————————
RESULTING CENTRIFUGATION (aC) PREFIXxSIN:
K° = 180 – (A° – acos[r0cosA°/r])
aC = √ ω²r(ω²r)0[(ω²r)0/ω²r + ω²r/(ω²r)0
– 2sinK°] resulting
centrifugal acceleration — cenLINE on E°
maC = the resulting centrifugating force
tanE° =
cosA/(sinA+d0–C0)
centrifugation action line slope C0.m.d0 —— m-velocity independent
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
C0 = d0(1+[t0/t]²)–1 = d0(1+[f /f0]²)–1
With d0 ¦ t1 ¦ t2 as 1.5 ¦ 1 ¦ 2 C0 becomes 1.5/5 = 0.3 from the Disk1 Origo tap center.
In relating the 1832 Gaspard Coriolis first theorem — defining the same properties as that deduced from Newton’s 3 in TheBASIC —THERE IS NO PERPENDICULARITY RELATION BETWEEN THE m-BODY RESULTING VELOCITY AND A RESULTING CORIOLIS FORCE IN A TWO DISK ROTATING SYSTEM; ”.. the Coriolis force, perpendicular to the relative motion ..”, Persson1998 FIG.7. We will study that part in a separate section more in detail [Coriolis2 ¦ Issue1].
• The definition of the centrifugal line angularity (E°) is completely isolated from any dependent connection with a v-resultant. The E° angle only depends on Disc2’s rotated m-body angle (A°), the tap distance (d0) between the two rotating discs, and their angular velocity relation (f/f0): no specific v-dependency. Instead, the centrifugal line (E°), as calculated, pushes an angular projection standard onto the resultant v(R), which final cenLINE projection v(r)=vCEN determines the (Brown) actual end Coriolis directed effect (ωvr). That is not the (Persson1998) stated Coriolis’ second theorem (Issue1).
RESULTING CORIOLIS ACCELERATION (ωvr) AND CORIOLIS FORCE (mωvr) PREFIXxSIN:
K° = 180 – (A° – acos[r0cosA°/r])
v(R) = √ ωr(ωr)0[(ωr)0/ωr + ωr/(ωr)0 – 2sinK°] resulting velocity vector
v(r) = v(R)sin(D°+90°+V°
– E°) ¦ v(R)-projection
on aC cenLINE defines the actual Coriolis velocity affected centrifugation
velocity
v(r) = vC = vCEN
—— whether vCEN is directed towards the
C0-centrifugation center reference [down], or away from it [up]
also determines the direction of the Coriolis effect — as
deduced in TheBASIC — in accordance with Gaspard
Coriolis’ first theorem 1832
• The Coriolis Acceleration Reaction direction — as deduced from The Basic:
———————————————————————————————
A mass-point (m) on Disc2 taken on the sum (v) of the two disc’s resulting m-velocities (machineDisc1v ¦+¦ machineDisc2v) THEN PROJECTED (vCEN) onto the resulting centrifugal-centripetal line of action (E°)
defines — and is related back to — The Basic:
• The Coriolis reacting acceleration (aCOR)— what can be measured by instrumentation — is realized with vCEN on E° as a (E°±90°) Coriolis acceleration — meaning:
• aCOR becomes a resulting force on m striving to displace m:s linear path — meaning: a potential corresponding Coriolis curvature is (about to be) shaped:
• The linear
deviating (centrifugal complementary) Coriolis acceleration (aCOR)/force
is always related and so proven from The Basic ¦ CoriolisFIRST
as perpendicular to the resultant vCEN executing centrifugal line
aCOR = ωvCEN
where ω is the resultant angular velocity (ω1 ¦+¦ ω2) from the two revolving disks (calculating cell codes here from the OpenOffice Swedish version’s spread sheet):
A first convenient — but not directly vector
represented — way of calculating the resultant angular velocity (ω) would
be (by using the main vector equation and with minor differences)
ω =
ROT(E6*D6*(E6/D6
+ D6/E6 - 2*COS(RADIANER(180+(GRADER(ARCSIN((H6*G3)/(ROT((H6*G3)^2 +
(I6+H6*G6)^2)))))-B7))))
; = the resulting angular
velocity on the revolving mass m-point
√(ω2*ω1*(Eω2/ω1
+ ω1/Eω2 - 2*cos((180+((aSIN((r2*cosA°)/(√((r2*cosA°)^2 + (d0 + r2*sinA°)^2))))) – A°))))
• A more truly related vector based reckoning uses the resultant from the (THEvCEN) cenLINE’s aCEN = ω²r with (deduced below)
rC0 = r = r0(sinA + d0 – C0)/sinE and then the more simple ω = √ aCEN/r where r is the more true vector related distance rC0 = pointC0.m.
vCENslope: THEvCEN
• aCOR so becomes taken/derived from the actually vector summed separate disk’s radially (v[r]) rotational velocities (Disc12v)
• and so ordained by the centrifugal-centripetal line of action (cenLINE, E°):
AS NOTED BY CALCULATION AND SOME AFTER MATH DEDUCTION:
• The degree of slope of the cenLINE — E° — follows a variable on the m-mass revolving angle on Disc2 — as directly (with actual parameters) from the spread sheet cell code (Swedish edition) in OpenOffice,
In
PREFIXxSIN:
E°
= ((aCOS((r2*cosA°)/(ROT((r2*cosA°)^2 + (d0+r2*sinA°)^2)))))
+
((aTAN(cos((180–(A°–((aCOS((r2*cosA°)/(√((r2*cosA°)^2
+
(d0+r2*sinA°)^2))))))))/((ω1^2*(√((r2*cosA°)^2 + (d0+r2*sinA°)^2)))/ω2²r2
-
sin((180–(A°–((aCOS((r2*cosA°)/(√((r2*cosA°)^2 + (d0+r2*sinA°)^2))))))))))))
—————————————————————————————————————————————————
There
is a more simple expression — derived from another perspective — see further
below;
tanE° = cosA/(sinA+d0–C0)
Its intersection with the tap distance d0 between the discs on distance C0 from Disc1 Origo is a constant if also the three parameters d0 and the two disks angular velocities (or their turn revolution times t1 and t2) are constant:
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
C0 = d0(1+[t0/t]²)–1 = d0(1+[f /f0]²)–1
With d0 ¦ t1 ¦ t2 as 1.5 ¦ 1 ¦ 2 C0 becomes 1.5/5 = 0.3 from the Disk1 Origo tap center.
The more simple expression for the vCEN variable slope E° when the Disk2 m-mass revolves A° = 0-360° then becomes in PREFIXxSIN
tanE° = r0cosA / (r0sinA + d0–C0)
= cosA / ( sinA + [d0–C0]/r0) — ¦ A18¦VBH¦1981author’sPref.
trigonometric PREFIXxSIN: x/r = sinA; y/r=cosA
b/rC0 = cosE = r0cosA/rC0 ; rC0 = r0cosA/cosE = r0tanE(sinA + d0 – C0)/cosE ¦ tan = cos/sin ¦ tan/cos = sec = 1/sin ¦ = r0(sinA + d0 – C0)/sinE
REASON FOR WHIRLING:
See also: Reason for Vortex
With a general decrease in warmth with increasing altitude, any down sucking push (WIND VORTEX PHYSICS) (with sufficient pace) of an aloft cold atmosphere forces its condition to meet the generally more warm one near ground.
• As always warm flows to cold, a corresponding pressure situation appears between outer and inner — as the push advances to the ground: Warmer outer air seeks to level out with the colder inner down sucked air
Illustration taken from author’s THE
ROTATING BODY in the INERTIA section
— on Einsteins general relativity principle.
See short in EARP — Swedish edition only
That warmer-outer to colder-inner pressure situation represents — along the radial extensions from the Earth’s rotating axis (TheBASIC) — a (vortex) inside contracting MOVE towards the vortex disc’s ideal center, left part above, extracted below and clarified:
If the warm-to-cold inner vortex disc pressure is reversed (above right) the reaction is opposed: the vortex disc begins to rotate clockwise. The explanation (hence) relies on a net differential resultant of the magnitude with which the Coriolis effect affects the vertical warm-cold-warm situation.
• As a vortex disc anyway has a metric extension, and situated outside/beside the polar axis, it is inevitable that its disc will sense a differential Coriolis strength resultant between inside north (less) and outside south (more). That determines its fate.
FinalCORIOLIS: WHIRLreason
FINAL Coriolis determining VECTOR RESULTANT
Established literature:
“ The total centrifugal force acting on the body m moving with a velocity V is directed perpendicular
to the tangent of the movement, along the radius of curvature (Fig. 6a).”,
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
— This is generally also the common way to put it in established descriptions.
In meteorological terms (FMperpendicularCite), we meet the same PERPENDICULAR TYPE formulation: »perpendicular to the linear motional extension».
TheBASIC suggests that such a generalization is an approximation, depending on situation:
Exemplifying on the (above right) clockwise candidate (below ¦ COR2):
• We have so far only taken into account an actual primary basic ideal constant radius ROTATION of Disc2, its specific mass m-point, as a FIX not mobile mass point in Disc1.
• The exemplified vector resultants as illustrated below shows that situation:
Left: Only with
a sufficiently small mD1v value relative a larger mD2v value, a resulting
m-body motional directed v will — closely — align a final cenLINE projected
vCEN — thereby »verifying general meteorological text book descriptions» of
perpendicularity: ’ aCOR is perpendicular to v’. That is: aCOR is always
exactly perpendicular to vCEN — most often in Earth meteorology (possibly very)
close to v. In this our COR2 example the mD1v-component is the greater of the
two — for clarifying the exact geometrical math of it.
The resulting m-body velocity (v)
direction lies close to but is not equally perpendicular to the actual
centrifugation vector summed resulting centrifugal E° line (cenLINE)
— see equation in RESULTING CENTRIFUGATION (aC):
The resulting m-body cenLINE projected
end station Coriolis’ first theorem (CorioslisFIRST)
velocity (vCEN)
then is the one in direction always in a perpendicular relation to an actual
resulting Coriolis acceleration (aCOR).
• But vCEN (close to, but never [Issue1] a v-perpendicular) is not the actual m-body motional (wind direction) resultant (v)
— the resulting v-equations in ResultingCoriolis
— but is apparently so described in type meteorological texts (FMperpendicularCite).
Compare:
’The Coriolis force .. is always directed perpendicular to the centrifugal line projected direction of a wind mass’ motional direction under some Coriolis effect influence’,
as explicitly shown (THEvCEN) by the vector reckoning results in the two disc fully accounted set up example COR2.
— In practice, the vortexes (Disc2) m-point is related as MOBILE along its ideal radial O’ connection.
— The m-point (a pressure situation pushing on the vortex’s ideal disc perimeter) is approaching (or receding) its disc centre — the actual more practical vortex situation — with the previous PRESSURE details encountered (WHIRLreason);
So: some
additional Coriolis effect acceleration will (inevitably) be added to the
larger scale Coriolis effect — in our type of Earth mass wind physics (type
cyclones or general wind whirling systems).
Unless there is some basic principle equilibrium properties (unknown here), we cannot say in what way the different rotational situations will summarize the Coriolis resultant relative the different possible rotationally additional motional ones. Without further investigations, this example (and some already established meteorological texts) attests or rather Claims in case of our Earth weather systems that the Coriolis resultant is a close perpendicular to the resultant (wind) motional direction. But we have (here) absolutely no clear cut evidence on the table for that such an assumption is applicable in all possible weather situations.
As deduced from TheBASIC, these now here COR2 exemplified and discussed presented vector components are, or should be, also the ones foremost appearing in the Earth wind vortex complex — in concord with Coriolis’ first theorem. See also BasicVORTEXphysics.
OUR REMARKABLE CULTURE OF SCIENTIFIC INSIGHT
Q1: CQ
Persson1998:
p1381c1m
” It remains a topic for historical research to find out why and how angular momentum conservation, in spite of the previous scientific objections, in the late 1940s became established as the key to understand the general circulation.”,
” Although its basis was never theoretically challenged, except by James (1953), its has been accepted with mixed feelings.”
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
Q2: CQ
”.. Likewise in the car, there simply is no real force pushing you back into your seat, your senses notwithstanding.”,
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-a-fictitious-force
SCIENTIFIC
AMERICAN Ask the Experts — What is a "fictitious force"? —
July 9, 2007
Q3: CQ
”The deflective force due to the earth’s rotation, which is the key to the explanation of many phenomena in 8connection with the winds and the currents of the ocean, does not seem to be understood by meteorologists and writers on physical geography—William Ferrel1”, s1ö,
”The development up to 1885 can be treated as historical since the problems have been resolved.
However, those discussed since are still unsolved or at least controversial.”, s16n,
”The crux of the matter does not lay in the mathematics but in our common senses which are still Aristotelian.”, s17ö,
”If the particle is not
stationary but moves (Vr) relative to the rotating system, it appears to be affected by an
additional force F = –2mΩ×Vr”,
;
”The cross product indicates that F is perpendicular both to the
relative motion Vr and to the rotational axis Ω. For this reason, and not only because the force is
inertial, the Coriolis force does not do any work, i.e. it does not change the speed (kinetic
energy) of the body, only the direction of its motion. The statement that the Coriolis force “does
not do any work” should not be misunderstood to mean that it “doesn’t do anything”4.”.
s2ö.
http://www.aos.princeton.edu/WWWPUBLIC/gkv/history/persson_on_coriolis05.pdf
The
Coriolis Effect:
FOUR
CENTURIES OF CONFLICT BETWEEN COMMON SENSE AND MATHEMATICS,
Part
I: A history to 1885, Anders O. Persson, 2005
Persson elucidates here what TheBASIC also conclude,
• Coriolis force (as in Earth wind systems) does not Do work
(but also what is left out of the picture):
— it Takes work. Any change do that.
Related physics: ALL CHANGES IN PHYSIC, WHATEVER, HAVE A CORRESPONDING KINETIC ENERGY RESOLUTION:
the Integral Analogy:
in mechanics and in
electro-physics (COEI)
as deduced in UH2008:
Q4: CQ
Wikipedia, Coriolis force 18Jul2022:
” Newton’s laws of motion describe the motion of an object in an inertial (non-accelerating) frame of reference.”,
WIKIPEDIA,
Coriolis force [18Jul2022]
Compare related correction:
’ AS
INAPPROPRIATELY INTERPRETED BY THE 1800+ MODERN ACADEMY INVENTED INERTIAL
SYSTEM (Einstein’s general relativity principle, see EARP),
MOST OFTEN ATTRIBUTED TO NEWTON AS ITS INVENTOR, HOWEVER WITH NO FOUND DIRECT QUOTATIONS FROM NEWTON
HIMSELF, ONLY SUCH CLAIMED IMPLICATIONS AS QUOTED, THE PRESENT ACADEMIC CONSENT
CLAIMS THAT, AS QUOTED,
Newton’s laws of motion describe the motion of an object in an inertial (non-accelerating) frame of reference.’.
It is apparent — by detailed proofs — that the Wikipedia community refers a type of scientific advocation in mathematics and physics on an exemplifying level of a
modern academy’s »doll’s house theater» (DiffGRAPHS):
• THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH THE INTELLIGENCE. Absolutely not. No way.
• However the inducement of using its content seems less familiar.
Compare — up to 1800, full nature forest — after 200 years: 30% removed forest area (ForestWORLD2012):
SWEDEN 2018 — State attacks Nature
Someone apparently missed the Natural Technological Evolution On Ramp. Most definitely yes.
• Forests — Leaf&Needle BioSURF — are for maintaining, developing and securing life energy power.
NOTHING ELSE.
We are apparently supposed to develop technology inside the forests. Not outside them, nature seems to point out.
— So, modern PhD:s: how do we DO that? Please share.
Q5: CQ
The perpendicular aspect
Wikipedia, Coriolis force 18Jul2022:
” The Coriolis force acts in a direction perpendicular to two quantities: the angular velocity of the rotating frame relative to the inertial frame and the velocity of the body relative to the rotating frame (more precisely, to the component of its velocity that is perpendicular to the axis of the rotation).”,
WIKIPEDIA,
Coriolis force [18Jul2022]
Wikipedia: please share a VECTOR ILLUSTRATION (COR2). So we can take the precise comparing from there
(please stop writing complex vector physics in text only — without corresponding illustrations: it only confuses, and attracts undefined personal favorite implicative pets).
• We (also — as of yet) note that the Wikipedia text have no mentioning of the resulting centrifugal line (vCEN) on which the Coriolis effect is realized.
• It is (further) certified — as in this presentation by TheBASIC — by Persson1998 in his description of the Coriolis’ two theorems:
” Three years later, in 1835, Coriolis went back to
analyze the relative motion associated with the system,
in particular the centrifugal force. It is directed perpendicular
to the moving body’s trajectory (seen from a
fixed frame of reference), which for a stationary body
is radially out from the center
of rotation. For a moving
body this is not the case; it will point off from the
center of rotation.”, p1378c2
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
The text illustrates the details in Persson’s FIG.7, same page: the resulting centrifugal line lies beside the rotational center.
IN GENERAL:
— Why is it so (immensely) hard for established authors to clarify the subject?
Test answer:
— Because
1. of the MODERN ACADEMIC 1800+ INVENTED INERTIAL SYSTEM and
2. the MODERN ACADEMIC 1800+ INVENTED VECTOR ALGEBRA SYSTEM which — guaranteed (Expansion Integral Example in Magnetism ¦ The MIT-example) — cannot handle mathematical physics EXCEPT ON THE LEVEL OF A DOLL’S HOUSE THEATER:
again, please:
SWEDEN 2018+ — STATE
ATTACKS NATURE
Eyes open.
— Cannot handle Natural Physics.
• Must INVENT — destroy: dominate, reign, rule, master, control. NEVER observe already existent.
Say again.
TheMAL: — TheBasic ¦ TheBaseCoriolisAnalogies ¦ CORIOLIS’ TWO THEOREMS ¦ COR2
Related physics 2022 — see also on The ZeroINTEGRAL
THE MODERN ACADEMIC LACK OF BASIC INSIGHT INTO
ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS:
GALILEI-NEWTON MECHANICS:
NATURAL DESCRIPTION
———————————————————————————————————————————
d distance M
t time S
w, v velocity M/S ¦ d/t
= Δd/Δt = (d/[n→∞]
= Δd)/(t/[n→∞] = Δt) = d/t
= w
a acceleration in general — basic linear as in v0/t , M/S²
å (a&circle) central action in general for a circular
motion ¦ ORIGO — å → centrifugalReaction
¦ radial
The circular motion by physical
principle apparently certifies that: d/[n→∞] = Δd
can never be exactly 0
action, the cause of a change
reaction, the effect from
change: always instrumental: what the deflected instrumental needle shows 
———————————————————————————————————————————
Centrifugal — radial — acceleration [å] in
explicit:
Left part — STATIC a=a CONDITIONS no
change: O is the Origo — center
point — uniting a peripheral body (P with mass m). Along the connecting path
O-P — the force-line — forces — mechanic or electric or magnetic — appear in
order to change the general path of P. In a rotation Origo is the center of a
rotating disc. Cause and effect, action and reaction, is regulated — always, no
exceptions — by Newton’s 3.
— We always test that — on the
24/7 occasion that we might have missed something important ..
• If P is a mass tied to a tread hung from O
circulating periodically around O, the force in the thread attaching P to O is
called the centripetal (action) force or centripetal acceleration. The
opposing balancing instrumental measuring part, the centrifugal force or the centrifugal
acceleration, is what we can feel; the reaction, always instrumental. No
exceptions. Ever.
Centripetal: Latin ce’ntrum, centre, and pe’tere, seek — towards O (approach)
Centrifugal: Latin ce’ntrum, centre, and fu’gere, escape — away from O (recede)
NOTE that th v0 designation in the figure above regularly reflects a possible centrifugation’s affection on a (partly) mobile radially related vr
— our actual Coriolis mass point or Coriolis region;
DESCRIPTION
It is this present demonstration apparently obvious that modern academy (1800+) never got the idea behind Galilei-Newton physics — nature — and its explaining details. And we are going to familiarize it all here — fundamentally, or not at all — by studying its machinery, exhaustingly exemplified in deep:
• On the basic resembling physical nature of the so called Coriolis effect (from Gaspard Coriolis 1835).
What we see above left is »the thing» that — apparently, this demonstration — never got the modern academic mind's attention:
• the basic nature of Central Action Mathematical Physics (See related basics in CENTRAL ACCELERATION — related Kepler momentum vr and Angular momentum basics mvr). It depicts (Newton’s 3:rd) the basic deduction of the centrifugal and centripetal balancing forces in nature
(equilibrium — related as deduced from the first principle of related physics P1)(OpeningAC):
[PHYSICS 7 PRINCIPLES APARC-FUNTOP-POM-NEONS-GRIP-DEEP-PASTOM were formulated (2002) in the preparatory work for UH (UniverseHistory) on collecting the then (1976+) generally deduced basics in related physics BASIC PRINCIPLES OF RELATED PHYSICS script 17Nov2002, 152 A4-pages]
MAL1: TheMAL
For a constant rotation the centripetal(←) and centrifugal(→) are in perfect balance
— where d/[n→∞] = Δd [See EULER EQUIVALENTS: (1+ξ/∞)∞ = (1+1/∞)ξ∞ and ZERO FORM ALGEBRA] approaches zero but never reaches zero, which would define a no rotation, a standstill
— as defined (uniform triangles — »comprehensible basics») by basic geometric math:
v0/w = d/r (See MATHEMATICS FROM THE BEGINNING)
And try to keep up now, all PhD:s, because this is
it, and without it, nothing is:
MAL2: TheMAL
v + iw .. (see simple Basic
complex algebra);
See also the same principal use of complex algebra in (Induction and Magnetism) the Causal Connection principle (never adopted in modern academic teaching system): Related physics explains the appearance of magnetism in a given gravitational reference on Light's liberty from kinetics and Light's gravitational dependency. All basic elementary related physics.
• Along the force-line Om
— the centripetal-centrifugal line of action and interaction where all changes come about, no exceptions, ever: central force action physics
— v0 suddenly senses a push out from O along Om.
The rotating centrifuging material senses some of its part breaking loose.
And — all educated PhD:s: what?
• BECAUSE (Newton’s 3:rd in explicit) all states are defined not by any inertial system, but by equilibrium, a balance (Newton’s 3:rd in explicit)
— physical laws hold for systems, not in systems,
see also in explicit from Newton’s PRINCIPIA 1687 (NoSYSTEM) in
:
”.. it follows that absolute rest cannot be determined from the position of bodies in our regions.”.
”Inertial system” apparently (Einstein’s general relativity principle, EARP) is a (1800+) modern academic invention, most often claimed to have Newton as its inventor, apparently obscuring and blocking the real straight and simple steel of Galilei-Newton mathematical physics: the way our nature works
— also any (onset of a) change in one of the two spouses irrevocably is followed/accompanied by a corresponding (reactive) state in the other — no exceptions. Ever:
MAL3: TheMAL
.. v + iw = 0 + iw↑ (no net x-axis difference: 0):
cause ...... effect
• And — meaning all PhD:s — what? The recently stated-derived-related definition:
MAL4: TheMAL
iw – iw↑ = – v
.. (see simple Basic
complex algebra)
• The amount of a higher degree of angular rotation is defined as
• a higher degree of centrifugation: the end onset reaction would suggest an increase in w.
— But, as we know, as in the practical case of the ice dancer; there is no w-forward push on the rotational velocity in this case: no increase w-energy (Ekin=mw²/2) source exists.
In the absence of a causal action-demanded forward w-push, an opposed w-reduction inevitably is forced to take place (See DISCUSSION) — as during the ice dancer (J=mwr) action, stretching the arms (r) out (J=mwr=m · w/n · nr — in time, friction losses reduces J by reduced w):
• w is reduced.
• The final end ReACTION station laboratory experimental physics part, then apparently is: a reduction of the angular rotation. The actual rotational acceleration is reduced (deceleration) — by a corresponding opposed (instrumentally sensed) back-push acceleration. Or, if w is maintained constant by a separate energy engine, the back push force is further enhanced on that conservation of w.
All triggered from the v0-change: the centrifugal push on a mass m. That is what we (now) identify and call
the Coriolis acceleration reaction: aCOR = ωv0;
MAL5: TheMAL
iw↑ – iw = +v0 : w↑ – w = +v0i–1 = +v0↓(minus y-axis) :
iw↑ – iw = –v0 : w↑ – w = –v0i–1 = –v0↓(minus y-axis) = +v0↑(plus y-axis)
——————————————————————————————
SHORT:
the x + iy = r is the [»hiTech»] advanced xy way of expressing r = √ x² +
y². See BasicComplex:
In
our case — iw↑= v0 + iw — there is no r-resultant, only action-reaction
along the pure xy-axes.
So:
the imaginay (i) part here features just a sophistiocated use of its algebraic
expressing power.
aCOR apparently pertains only to a »semi-solid mass systems»-type of kinetics (Ekin=mw²/2: the rotational energy is opposed — reduced — by the frictional property in the Coriolis effect; wind power decreases by time and is zero when rotation is zero).
TheBaseCoriolisAnalogies:
MAL5
Meaning: Only mass systems where a centrifugation
pushes on mass motions, whatever.
Examples:
• Earth’s humid air mass systems pushed by Earth’s centrifugation (BasicVORTEXphysics);
• A direct mechanical two-disc system [‡] with one mounted on the other — as a cyclone rotates on the rotating Earth;
• The faster Earth rotation on the much slower Sun-Earth rotating arm;
• The axially distance-mounted ball bearings (Disc2) on a rotating crankshaft (Disc1) _—¯— ..
cont.
The v0 part
in a regular rotational radial case is designed vr :
iw↑ – iw = v
: w↑ – w = vi–1
= v↓(minus y-axis) :
There is no
way, space, nature — type — of distraction or intervention, attack or anything else
in this universe that can change the course of these events, alter them, tamper
on them, or other state of affairs blocking the true and simple nature of their
action and reaction. No mother god loving way.
— So how, all
PhD:s, is it that IT is not shown inside modern academic teaching system
quarters?
t
= w/ωvr ; t = ωr/ωvr = r/vr ;
It
is apparently imperative that the changing direction should be related to
(projected upon) — in explicit — the (resulting) centrifugal — forcing — line. Not
in explicit the rotational radius — because there are some physics where these
— radius versus centrifugal line — deviate (see TheCOR2 application — Coriolis’ second theorem).
The entire
action is governed by an already established rotational velocity w on r from O.
The — potential, if m is solid to the rotating disc — Coriolis acceleration
along r is then mathematically denoted by the physical property of acceleration
M/S² : a = w/t = 2pir/t0/t with t=r/v[r]; v[r]=r/t, t cancels. And further as
written.
RelatedLiRaNo: BaseAnalogies RELATED MATH:
Or — if correctly apprehended — as Newton put it in his PRINCIPIA
1687 translated 1729 by Andrew Motte from Latin to English:
” There is only one real circular motion of any one revolving
body”, Newtons
famous vessel experiment.
A circular motion (xy) — v0 > 0 — cannot be related to (deduced from) a linear — not revolving (x) — reference — v0 = 0. No way. Say again.
Compare: Planck constant h =
mcr — the Neutron in
related physics: conservation of angular momentum (spin)
secured.
• Apparently only a Causality Principle can fix the understatements (translation versus rotation) — but where in modern corridors? No light.
Persson1998, 1: Persson1998 2
” Many textbooks are anxious to tell the student that the
Coriolis force is a “fictitious
force,” “an apparent force,” “a pseudoforce,” or
“mental construct.” The centrifugal force, however, although equally
fictitious, is almost always talked about as a force. This leaves the
impression that some fictitious forces are more fictitious than others.”, p1375
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?
Anders
Persson, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts — United Kingdom,
1998
http://www.aos.princeton.edu/WWWPUBLIC/gkv/history/Persson98.pdf
In established corridors the Coriolis acceleration is written and claimed (Persson1998) as
Also compare the 2ωv-Wikipedia-explanation
from Sep2012 in WikipediaCoriolis.
So: This SIMPLE central-force derived rank apparently does not exist in
modern quarters. What’sUp?
Compare a Direct derivation by simulating a direct (mathematical) violation on physics — breaching and mixing xy coordinations:
w = vn = 2πr/t = ωr ; å = vn2/r = ω2r ; år2 = vn2r = vnvn · r ≠ ωr · vr · r = ωvr · r2 = ”år2”
Dn [
ωvr · r2
] = [ ωvr · r2
]’ = d[ ωvr · r2
]/dr = 2ωvr · r
; [ ωvr · r2
]’/r = 2ωvr = the
established Coriolis acceleration
The same end result on The Gravitation Law ¦ 2vn2 = 2vnvn ¦ 2vnvn · vr/vn = 2vnvr :
F = ma = Gmm2/r2
; a = Gm2/r2
; ar2 = Gm2
; (Gm2)’ = d(ar2)/dr
= 2ar ; a = å = vn2/r
; 2ar = 2(vn2/r)r
= 2vn2
; = 2ω2r2
2vn2 ≠ 2vnvr = 2ωrvr = ([vr/vn]Gm2)’/r
= 2ωvr = the
established Coriolis acceleration.
• A similar xy coordination breach (sine, cosine) violation is proven on THE EXPANSION INTEGRAL — the most detailed example in exemplifying each specific vector part in how modern academic invented, not deduced, ideas of physics — modern vector algebra calculus — destroys the basic and underlying understanding of basic physical phenomena — on the nature of comprehending and explaining Magnetism&Induction — in modern corridors versus in related physics and mathematics (The collapse of modern academic vector algebra).
• A third (»The Final Countdown») example directly involves The Causal Principle: distinguishing — deducing the different realms of — Induction from Magnetism, and the meaning of the constant µ0 in these respectively branches, see Micro0. See also a TREATISE on the practical — industrial — mathematical side of these issues in three comparing examples on induction.
• And by the same standard — practically same mathematical ranks, completely different descriptive interpretations, in EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS: comparing expressions, and their underlying texts. See also in explicit Figure 1
— Einstein, Schwarzchild, and Related physics compiled for comparison on Light’s Gravitational Dependency.
— See also The DiffGRAPHS: modern academic ideas of nuclear physics versus related physics and the corresponding atomic masses by experimental comparison. That introduced Universe History @Internet August 2008.
RelatedPhysics: ZeroINTEGRAL
What is the reason behind — an apparently consequent »all over the place» modern crash on coordination basics 1800+? TEST ANSWER:
— WHILE an instrumental read-out value is INDEPENDENT OF VIEW
RELATED PHYSICS:
The laws of physics hold FOR systems. Not IN
systems:
• There is
no ”inertial system” in physics;
• Physics’
property is variation = no rest.
• The
reference is The State: the instrumental readout.
And whatever its next coming performance will be, deduced from the present —
completely independent of VIEW.
modern academic 1800+ vector algebra system has created a general xyz COORDINATION TRANSFORMATION SYSTEM — having absolutely no care at all for an underlying DEDUCED physics properties: IT FRANKLY EXPECTS THESE — such properties — TO FOLLOW THE INVENTED MODERN VECTOR CALCULUS’ INERTIAL SYSTEM VIEW CHARACTERISTICS, WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT. Compare the Sep2012 WikipediaCoriolis.
— Result: The principle of CAUSALITY is perfectly LOST first we study nature, then we draw mathematical conclusions: modern academy mingles induction with magnetism. Provably in to the last atom (TREATISE). And the whole performance ends up in a veritable »doll’s house theater» — on a splendid technologically demonstrated exceptionally eminent scene status after 200 years:
• PERFECTLY GOOD FOR BUSINESS AND TOOL SHOP INSTRUMENTATION —
outrageously simply stone dead — and deaf — for LIFE: modern academic
thinking takes no knowledge argumentation: HumanRight.
It creates its own — on this credit:
A SOCIETY OF TRUE NATURAL INSIGHT DOES NOT TREAT NATURE LIKE THIS. NO MOTHER GOD LOVING WAY. No way. Havoc.
With alike splendid text book educational references, and their accompanying examples[‡]:
Wikipedia texts (consequently) occasionally changes their costume: the cited form 1Aug2022 reads:
” In physics, the Coriolis force is an inertial or fictitious force[1] that acts on objects in motion within a frame of reference that rotates with respect to an inertial frame.”
ARE YOU FRANKLY SUGGESTING THAT MODERN ACADEMIC COMMUNITY IS STUPID?
— No. Absolutely not. But I do claim on these examples and documents that modern academy is deluded by its idea of universal supremacy — featuring a human history’s gallantly most excited stupid, all classes. Please correct.
Compare related physics from Coriolis first theorem as related here:
• Coriolis acceleration, force and effect is by related detail a specific motional deflection of centrifugally connected masses — as in:
• Earth’s humid air mass systems pushed by Earth’s centrifugation (BasicVORTEXphysics);
• A direct mechanical two-disc system[‡] with one mounted on the other
— as a cyclone rotates on the rotating Earth;
• The faster Earth rotation on the much slower Sun-Earth rotating arm;
• The axially distance-mounted ball bearings (Disc2) on a rotating crankshaft (Disc1) _—¯— ..
COMPLETELY INDEPENDENT OF VIEW.
Some Lead apparently missed the technological
on-ramp.
COMPARE related corrected the Wikipedia quote:
’ In PRESENT ESTABLISHED CONSENSUS physics, the Coriolis force is APPREHENDED BY SPECIFIC CONSENTED NOMENCLATURE STANDARDS AS an inertial or fictitious force[1] that acts IN GENERAL WITHOUT KINETIC DISTINCTIONS, GENERALIZED TO CONTAIN KINEMATIC VIEWING ASPECTS on objects in motion within a frame of reference that rotates with respect to OUR NORMAL ABILITY TO COMPREHEND INDEPENDENT OF VIEWING ASPECTS, OFTEN TERMED IN PRESENT QUARTERS an inertial frame’.
So, in conclusion:
WHEN modern academy begins with its 1800+ famous
”within a frame of reference that rotates with respect to an inertial frame” we can be safely sure that
1. Half the pedestrian population is reduced in a blink, and
2. The remaining half struggles hard to coordinate their brain cells with the present authoritative suggestions on HOW they work. Also compare Quote1998Persson2.
3. World populated humanity really adores Math over anything. It is such a Joy.
SWEDEN Jun2018 — a culture with apparently
very and deeply PRIMITIVE ideas of technology .. earlier of the opposite kind
..
Alive Leaf&Needle are for
sustaining and developing LIFE.
Their Agency, trees, are Not for profit. And also
apparently not for Energy on any kind of industrial scale.
— Modern academy mathematics and physics in humanity features a doll’s house theater — having destroyed practically every inch of the surface of our Earth in only 200 years (1800+). Say it:
— Business enterprise (1800+) takes no knowledge argument: human right — you’re wrong:
• Relative nature, it is destructive. It cannot accomplish a constructive natural intercourse. No way.
There is nothing wrong with business as such. Problem comes with
business ideas of supremacy:
• Trafficking on life/humanity for profit inevitably generates destruction — by DRIFT. Not by plan.
cont.
• The REACTION part — what the instrument samples and shows, the ball hung from a thread in the rooftop, what we can feel on the final measuring countdown — apparently is The Coriolis acceleration (ωvr);
• The Coriolis Effect, in explicit, apparently
pertains only to kinetics (as also Gaspard Coriolis seems to have pointed
out by Persson1998)
— not kinematics: not video takings of missiles or thrown tennis balls or other
”relative rotating objects” movies. These latter belong to the branch of »coriolisCINEMA»
and have no connection to the 1832 Gaspard Coriolis stated first theorem FORCE
OVER DISTANCE : kinetics. Torque: E=Fd. Lever.
• The Coriolis Effect — hence — pertains to —
preferentially — semi-solid connections between moving-rotating bodies — as air
above the rotating Earth, or water relative the dry land parts — or matter in a
rotating Galaxy and others alike
— or the ball
bearings of a crankshaft in a V8 on a high turn.
CHANGES ALONG THE CENTRIFUGAL-CENTRIPETAL LINE
REFLECTS A PERPENDICULAR CORIOLIS RESPONSE (mass formating morphology).
SUMMATION
If there would be even one single practical — no killing nature — example in modern academic teaching system of what, exactly, can be accomplished with modern academy VECTOR ALGEBRA on a true educational level between a human and its nature, this would be the one:
CONCLUSION
Apparently not this one: TheMAL.
ASPIRATION
Trying to get the academic population back INTO nature, again: working WITH nature. Not against her.
— How would that be realized?
— Only one candidate to choose on: knowledge. HumanRight: Exposing the real bad guys:
— Not the person. But its mental inducement of having human affairs on planet Earth in Universe OTHER THAT THOSE INTENDED BY NATURE TO KEEP THE PERSON ALIVE, FRESH AND HEALTHY (read: stop killing humanity);
Proofs of
Natural Science
THE MASS OF THE EARTH HAS DIRECT EQUIVALENCES TO THE KNOWN
EARTH’S CRUST WATER MASS AND THE EARTH SURFACE VEGETATION MASS
— COMPILED GEOLOGICAL RESEARCH DATA DURING THE 1900s: Earth
crust isotopic compositions
———————————————
MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ AR123-CWONsum ¦ BIOYTAN ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ PrimDATA ¦ EarthMass ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ BioSURF
A29.1 UDHR10Dec1948:
Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
Show. Give examples. Dazzle us. Full development.
DISCUSSION ON MAL34
CHANGE TAKES INERTIA:
Mechanical — kinetic — energy E = mv²/2 inevitably is converted with change.
Because Earth’s rotation is responsible for the Earth’s surface centrifugation phenomena or can so be related to be in every detail as in The Wind Proof — surface gas is pushed from pole to equator — and centrifugation is responsible for the (TheBASIC) Coriolis effect, there is no escape from the fact that the kinetic energy associated with the change — centrifugal deflection — TAKES INERTIA from Earth’s rotational energy. Not from the Sun’s heat.
• THAT TAKEN MECHANICAL INERTIAL LOSS ENERGY IS APPARENTLY NOT REFILLED OR SUSTAINED OR MAINTAINED FROM THE SUN. In no possible physical way it is so. But established texts do so claim — on not specified physical grounds. Searched for. None yet found (InetQuotes24Jun2022).
Compare
” The
velocity of the air motion defines the strength of wind and is directly related to the
amount of energy in the wind,
that is -- its kinetic energy. The source of
this energy,
however, is solar radiation.”,
Wind Power Fundamentals, PDF 2007/2017
— Alexander Kalmikov, PhD ¦ Massachusetts Institute of Technology:
adjusted as related physics (Wind Speeds):
’ The
velocity of the air motion defines the strength of wind and is directly related to the
amount of energy in the wind,
that is -- its kinetic energy. The source of
this energy,
however, is temperature differences generated by
Earth’s rotational centrifugation and its Coriolis effect on the air gases, as
calculated (ground conditions) from the General gas law expressions
v = (v1 = √ 3T1R/U) – (v2 = √ 3T2R/U) = (√T1·√ 3R/U) – (√T2 ·√ 3R/U)
= (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2) — General gas law equations:
v = (√ 3R/U)(√T1–√T2)
gas constant GAS
¦ temperature difference defines max wind speed
based on a general wind mass (linear momentum) p=mv=m/n×vn=mn×v/n
arbitrary distribution with its basic total available kinetic energy
E = mv2/2 = m[(√
3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)]2/2; no available absolute temperature
parameter
E = (3mR/U)[T1+T2
– 2√T1T2]/2
— and in no way
maintained by any kind or sort of insolation power by itself — in explicit
clarified in the simple section on THEMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM.
’.
• Insolation has no connection to Earth’s rotational energy — wind generation.
The Coriolis effect — the centrifugal push from pole to equator — is (VortexPhysics) or can be so related in every detail the fundamental cause behind differentiation of pressure and a fragmented distribution of a constant (global average) insolation temperature, responsible for wind. The Sun has no generating part in that processing, except in maintaining a constant average global temperature (constantly fragmenting through Earth’s rotational physics).
The differentiation in heat and pressure is not an insolation effect, but a rotational fragmentation of an ideal thermal equilibrium, constantly seeking to restore balance with respect to a given constant insolation, which never happens — as long as Earth rotates.
As known: None of the above wind connecting-defining expressions can be related back to the Sun — Only back to Earth’s rotation.
See TheMAL
FURTHER — for the interested student as an exact reference in basic classic Galili-Newton physics:
COR2: AN EXHAUSTIVE CORIOLIS THEOREM II TWO DISC EXAMPLE
WITH FULLY ACCOUNTED MATH TRIMMED EQUATIONS AND EXPRESSIONS AND OF COURSE WITH
FULLY ILLUSTRATED GRAPHS
SHOWING THE RESULTING ROTATIONAL VALUES 0-360° (13Jul2022)
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
— The already established texts are not overly enthusiastic in exposing BASIC examples on an ELEMENTARY level — not seen @Internet.
We will try to break that ice in this production.
By physical units — the Coriolis deflected centrifugal line’s (vCEN) deflection distance point C0 — COR2 ¦ GANVEC
MATHEMATICAL DEDUCTION THROUGH ELEMENTARY ACCELERATION a = v/t =(d/t)/t = d/t² ;
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
C0(å/r + å0/r0) = d0(å/r)0
Given: Two rotating discs (a lower O¦t and an upper O’¦t0 mounted on the lower) with center separation distance d0 ;
C0 becomes the OO’ displaced vector centrifugal center point from the discs summed centrifugal acceleration contributions (we relate O-action to a revolving mass point m on O’ at r0 from O’). The faster O’-rotation relative the O-rotation, the closer C0 approaches O’.
UHGyroMath
The same »collecting inertial property» is (most easily) experimentally
seen in a fast rotating top: its resistance to deflect from its upright
position increases with its angular velocity: »the top collects inertia into
its own rotational axis in proportion to its angular velocity».
FORMULATION
THE APPEARANCE OF AN EXTENDED centrifugal point (centerO’¦å=ω0²r0) from a given (centerO¦å=ω²r) by a distance (d0)
defines a RESULTANT mean vector centrifugal acceleration centerC0¦å=d0ω² defined by the balancing equilibrium
d0ω² = C0(ω² + ω0²)
where C0 is the mean centrifugal vector point distance from the main centerO along the line OO’.
THAT IS:
• A secondary (ω0²) disc rotating on a primary
(ω²) disc with centers separated by the distance d0 exposes
that
• The vector resultant centrifugal center point lies C0 from O;
C0 = d0(1+[t0/t]²)–1 = d0(1+[f /f0]²)–1
TheBASIC: TheMAL ¦ EarthWIND
Fundamentals
THE BASIC — aCOR=ωvr —
detailed in TheMAL
Once
familiarized, the illustration and its inner processing mathematical physics — basic action and reaction by
exact related order in all experimental physics, no exceptions, guaranteed as
deduced — will hardly be forgotten.
See all details
in The
MAL, unless already acquainted.
PHYSICS’ PROPERTY IS VARIATION WHILE ITS UNDERSTANDING
IS NOT: state, value, »a freeze».
IN RELATED PHYSICS WE HENCE STRONGLY DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE WORLD OF PHENOMENA (Δx movie), PHYSICS, AND THE WORLD OF COMPREHENSION (dx reality), THE UNDERSTATEMENTS OF PHYSICAL ACTION: ITS MATHEMATICS: THE WORLD OF REAL STEEL. Say again.
»BASIC PhD EDUCATION» Jul2022:
WORLD OF PHENOMENA Δx ¦ variation by distance physics — action
WORLD OF COMPREHENSION dx
¦ state: noTIME — situation
of vectors everywhere not existent in physics
not represented in modern
corridors — neither is a friendly attitude towards nature:
:
EXAMPLE: SWEDEN Jun2018 — a culture with
apparently very and deeply PRIMITIVE ideas of technology ..
1800+: someone missed the on-ramp to
Technology. Alive Leaf&Needle are for sustaining and
developing LIFE. Not for profit. Not for Energy.
KINETICS
motion of bodies with respect
to the forces acting upon them
PhD:s — EX1:
SAME INDEPENDENT RESULT:
— The passenger photographing the deflected hung ball as the car accelerates
is documenting exactly the same thread-needle deflection as
— The person standing beside the road photoing the deflection inside the paassing car.
• Exactly.
— OR the Person in The Galactic Andromeda Center. Or any other. Come again.
• Independent.
• Same value. Same quantity.
— Why is it that modern academic teaching system has no concept for That? Say.
An accelerated body-system is
no mother god loving way a body at rest. No way. Ever.
PhD:s — EX2:
We analyze 2 rotating discs by measuring their acceleration properties (preferentially by a [vertically] hung ball from a thread on each disc’s solid material):
• A lower larger disc with a constant revolution of 1 second per turn (1Hz);
• An upper minor disc, fast mounted on the lower (by a center tap with high tech ball bearings) with a constant revolution of 2 seconds per turn (½Hz):
PhD: In what place, region, locality or other in Universe is the deflected quantities in every moment NOT exactly the same observed as in ANY other region or locality?
— As far as we know: There is nothing such. Never was. Never will be.
The position of observation does not count — as long
as we specify the instrumental deflections: the only physical preferences we
have.
A MEASURE IS A MEASURE INDEPENDENT OF FROM WHERE THE MEASURE WAS MEASURED: EXPERIMENTATION IS UNIVERSAL:
PHYSICAL LAWS HOLD FOR ALL BODIES AND PHYSICAL SYSTEMS. NEVER IN THEM: IF SO THOUGHT, PHYSICS COLLAPSES.
• Physics is apparently explained from the world of comprehension — state:
A state does not exist in physics:
but modern academy 1800+ demanded a physical object for it, invented as:
Inertial System — claiming Newton to be its origin — with zero mentioning from Newton himself, only so Interpreted by modern academy 1800+ (Q4 ¦ MAbackground)
RelatedPhysics: there are no resting places or resting points in physics: physics is — defines — variation. And we use differentials (»zeros») to define and formulate the processes in physics — orderly: the form laws (variants and universals — conventionally differential equations [and their corresponding — for which modern academic mathematics has no describing nomenclature, as noted by exhaustive deduction]).
WORLD OF PHENOMENA Δx ¦ variation by distance physics — action
WORLD OF COMPREHENSION dx
¦ state: noTIME — situation
of vectors everywhere not existent in physics
not represented in modern corridors — neither is a friendly — jurisdictional — attitude towards nature
— What means ”PREFIXxSIN”?
PREFIXxSIN takes
all the trigonometric functions nomenclature — directly easy to remember —
straight with consequent sin-cos-tan syntax — even in imaginary terms [not written out here].
— The SINE base
— horizontal preference, as we see — is the natural choice. But modern
corridors has it not. There — PREFIXxCOSINE — students struggle [hard] in trying to
remember the »complex
typecasts».
— What is the simple secret difference? Just switch the LABELS
sin-cos between the two different prefixes. No more. No less.
• The rest adjusts itself automatically —
guaranteed always with high elegance.
— When we [believe] we can master both [if someone wakes us
up in the middle of the night], with NoProblemo, we are ready to move on.
Absolutely [because ”shift labels” is definitely more easy to remember that the
actual hieroglyphs].
— That means, in an OpenOffice calculating cell, You have to
write SIN for cos and COS for sin?
— Yes .. And ..? Gallantly. The more brains we use for MIND,
the fresher the air around.
WHACNE: WindProof¦ Wind
power ¦ Wind basics ¦ MainARTICLE ¦ TheBASIC ¦ EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS
Show your version of the explaining mathematical
physics — and let us compare. Please.
” The air of the Ferrel cell that descends at 30° latitude returns poleward at the ground level, and as it does so it deviates toward the east. In the upper atmosphere of the Ferrel cell, the air moving toward the equator deviates toward the west. Both of those deviations, as in the case of the Hadley and polar cells, are driven by conservation of angular momentum. As a result, just as the easterly Trade Winds are found below the Hadley cell, the Westerlies are found beneath the Ferrel cell.”,
WIKIPEDIA,
Atmospheric circulation 2Jul2022:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_circulation -
Ferrel_cell
General ideas
With the idea that wind power on Earth is generated by a constant photometric effect from the Sun (INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022), it is natural to state the wind power energy engine as
”driven by conservation of angular momentum”. No losses.
Free environmental safe and clean energy to all.
With a deduced simple elementary physics based on spherical rotation as the cause of wind power on Earth, the idea of a conservation of angular momentum (J=mvr) however has no physical solidity. The rotation (v) — friction (wind), constantly loses power. And no angular momentum of a constant nature will ever exist on that premise.
Compare academic consensus
See Quote 1 — certifying that the Earth wind subject has been — and still is — a subject of diverse nature in modern corridors: the Quest of ”conservation of angular momentum” in the wind power origin issue.
MainARTICLE: EWF
WHACNE — ω = 2πf = 2π/t0 — WyNotMAC?
WHAT MODERN ACADEMY COULD NEVER EXPLAIN
Wind Power ¦ Coriolis Effect ¦ Coriolis Force-Coriolis Acceleration-CoriolisAction-CoriolisReaction ¦ General ACTION and REACTION in Physics —
• NOT BECAUSE ANY LACK OF INTELLIGENCE. ABSOLUTELY NOT. BUT APPARENTLY BECAUSE LACK OF CONVICTION TO USE ITS CONTENT. Say again. Main article from TheBASIC — see TheMAL.
— What are you trying to say? Sufficiently
smart to INVENT ideas BLOCKING the natural ones that do explain the
nature of the problem.
— And besides: we haven’t seen your version yet.
RELATED PHYSICS SUMMATION 27Jun2022
Coriolis basics from Gaspard Gustave Coriolis (1792-1843) [Aug2012] with some guidance from A. Persson (quotes 1998-2005):
Persson1998, 2: Persson1998 1
THE WELL KNOWN IMPOSSIBLE TO
UNDERSTAND MODERN ACADEMIC attempt of
explaining THE CORIOLIS EFFECT by inability to explain the idea behind
— even very well attested to be so inside the modern academy corridors: see
full quote in MACoriolisNOTE:
” Clutching the teacher’s hand, they are carefully guided across a narrow gangplank over the yawning gap between the resting frame and the uniformly rotating frame. Fearful of looking down into the cold black water between the dock and the ship, many are glad, once safely aboard, to accept the idea of a Coriolis force, more or less with blind faith, confident that it has been derived rigorously. And some people prefer never to look over the side again.
(Stommel and Moore 1989).”,
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
http://www.aos.princeton.edu/WWWPUBLIC/gkv/history/Persson98.pdf
MASSPÅVERKAN
UTMED CENTRIFUGALKRAFTENS VEKTORRIKTNING along That Line which defines —
measueres — rotation
Mass
affection along the centrifugal force-vector direction
The Coriolis
Effect — 2Jun2022 (MainARTICLE) ¦ TCE
from Gaspard Coriolis 1835 with additional notes from
Persson1998¦2005, see from Coriolis ¦ Coriolis’ two theorems ¦ The
5 Coriolis propositions ¦ CORRECTIONS
certifying that the Debates and Students Frustrations
have followed the subject consistently ..
w = d/t =
2πr/t0 = 2π/t0 · r
= 2πf · r = ω[Greek omega, angular velocity]r
................... ¦ M/S
On NEWTON’S 3
OPENING A CORIOLIS EFFECT ¦ APPLICATION: COR2
EXACT RELATED AND PERFECTLY FULL EXPLANATION
IN 4 STEPS impossible to miss
Main article from TheBASIC — see TheMAL. See also (further established examples in) FocaultCORIOLIS.
MAC Arbitrary Action-Reaction :
”The third of Newton's laws of motion of classical mechanics states that forces always occur in pairs. This is related to the fact that a force results from the interaction of two objects. Every force ('action') on one object is accompanied by a 'reaction' on another, of equal magnitude but opposite direction. The attribution of which of the two forces is action or reaction is arbitrary. Each of the two forces can be considered the action, the other force is its associated reaction.”,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_(physics)
@INTERNET
Wikipedia — Reaction (physics) [2012-09-23]
• ”Each of the two forces can be considered the action, the other force is its associated reaction”:
— Inventing what does not exist — ”inertial system” — and caring for the rest as ”fictitious” (Quote2 ¦ Persson1998 ¦ ModernIdeationQuotes ¦ and ”arbitrary” (as quoted above), apparently only one way remains:
BingSearch:
3Jul2022
"It is not really a force", centrifugal
10 results
”fictitious force”, Centripetal versus
centrifugal | Physics Forums
• The lettuce began to rot.
REMAINING:
Nothing we know of — else than a completely totally misapprehended idea of basic elementary natural physics.
SWEDEN 2018+
Destroyed Premises — 1800+.
NATURE will take at least 200 years to restore — once allowed.
Claim whatever you want.
— .. But you’re not in a majority.
— .. And what says any would have to?
Nature does not work that way.
• All because of this (at present only the basic Swedish text — further English part in cont.):
EARPref: OpeningAC
MODERN ACADEMY INVENTION OF CLAIMING NEWTON TO BE THE ORIGIN OF THE IDEA OF AN INERTIAL SYSTEM — WITH ZERO QUOTATIONS FROM NEWTON HIMSELF[‡], only on such implications from handling Newton as a comprehensive infant.
Uppfinningen — uppkomsten — av
den moderna akademins missuppfattning av fysiken generell: ”intertialsystemet”,
dess grundsats:
Einsteins allmänna relativitetsprincip, [EARP],
”Om också naturbeskrivningen fordrar ett av oss godtyckligt infört koordinatsystem, så borde likväl valet av dess rörelsetillstånd ej vara underkastat någon inskränkning. Lagarna borde vara fullkomligt oberoende av detta val (den allmänna relativitetsprincipen).”,
Short direct translation:
— »If also the natural description demands one of us arbitrarily inserted coordinate system, nevertheless its state of motion should not be subjected to any limitation. The laws ought to be completely independent of that choice (the general relativity principle)», Albert Einstein 1934
MIN VÄRLDSBILD Albert Einstein s175 ¦ Bonniers 1934:
”Skulle verkligen de fysikaliska lagarnas oberoende av koordinatsystemets rörelsetillstånd endast gälla för koordinatsystem med ömsesidig likformig translationsrörelse? Vad har naturen att skaffa med de av oss införda koordinatsystemen och deras rörelser? Om också naturbeskrivningen fordrar ett av oss godtyckligt infört koordinatsystem, så borde likväl valet av dess rörelsetillstånd ej vara underkastat någon inskränkning. Lagarna borde vara fullkomligt oberoende av detta val (den allmänna relativitetsprincipen).”,
MIN VÄRLDSBILD Albert Einstein s175 · Bonniers
1934 [Citat:14]
”The laws ought to be completely independent of that choice”.
”Lagarna borde vara fullkomligt oberoende av detta val”;
— They are already that, Albert. The STATE
Principle (Newton’s 3) — The ZERO
INTEGRAL. Say again.
— De är redan det, Albert. Se INERTIALSYSTEMET
I MODERN AKADEMI.
Albert Einstein förstod aldrig Newton. Rätta gärna om fel. Visa. Ge exempel.
Albert Einstein never understood Newton.
Correct if wrong. Show. Give
example.
DETALJERAT BESKRIVBART OCH FÖRKLARBART IN TILL SISTA ATOMEN.
Praktiska Exempel i DEN ROTERANDE KROPPEN.
• Fysikens lagar gäller inte I system. De gäller FÖR system (Fysikens 7 Principer):
• Har alltid vait. Är nu. Kommer alltid att vara.
”Enligt den klassiska fysiken är de fysikaliska lagarna för en roterande kropp skilda
från dem som gäller för en kropp som inte roterar. Om tröghetslagen är giltig i
det ena fallet, gäller den inte i det andra”.
FYSIKENS UTVECKLING · Albert
Einstein, Leopold Infeld
Natur Och Kultur 1938 ·
s157[178, Olika biblioteksupplagor]
NoATT: EARP
DEN KLASSISKA FYSIKEN HAR INGA SÅDANA ATTRIBUT:
Modern akademi/Einstein har aldrig
förstått Newton/Galilei/Kepler. No way.
— Formuleringen är helt och hållet
en konstruktion i modernt tänkande. Bevisbart i varje enskild minsta detalj, in
till sista atom.
• Säg något Intelligent nu, får vi höra. Blända oss.
— Den moderna akademins företräden har sådana — väl relaterbara — helt galna bevekelsegrunder i sin förmenta logik, att man undrar om inte hela den framställningen är tagen ur en teater av särskild dignitet. Vad är haken? Haken är: Den moderna akademins (1800+) uppfunna idé om ett INERTIALSYSTEM ett fysikaliskt OBJEKT i fysiken som referens för fysikaliskt skeende: det finns ingen sådan referens eller preferens i fysiken. Fysiken relaterar till jämvikt. Inte till system. Se särskilt i NEWTONS BERÖMDA ÄMBARFÖRSÖK, Newton själv:
”There is only one real circular motion of any one revolving body”.
Modern akademi förstår inte principerna. No way. Se även VARFÖR KAN INTE ETT INERTIALSYSTEM FINNAS I FYSIKEN.
Eftersom fysiken — tydligtvis — inte har plats för några referenssystem i någon absolut mening, och att några sådana förmodade system följaktligen heller inte kan finnas i principerna som beskriver fysiken, vore det verkligen sensationellt att få bese något enda citat från Newton själv där begreppet ”inertialsystem” utpekas — i enlighet med gängse påståenden. Men allt man finner är ”Newton menar”, och ”Newton anser” och ”Enligt Newton”. Newton citeras aldrig.
Inertial System in Modern ACademy — versus
Equilibrium in Related Physics: there are no inertial systems in physics, says
and proves related physics; ”inertial system” was apparently and provably[‡]
in every significant detail invented/adopted 1800+ by modern academy (»a new
way of logical thinking») with the offspring of Einstein’s General Relativity
Principle
” Om också naturbeskrivningen fordrar ett av oss godtyckligt infört koordinatsystem, så borde likväl valet av dess rörelsetillstånd ej vara underkastat någon inskränkning. Lagarna borde vara fullkomligt oberoende av detta val (den allmänna relativitetsprincipen).”,
MIN VÄRLDSBILD Albert Einstein s175 · Bonniers 1934..
— De är redan det, Albert:
• JÄMVIKT: fysikens lagar
gäller för alla fysiska
kroppar, alla ”system”, helt oberoende av deras rörelsetillstånd. Inte i
system.
• Vi relaterar alltid fysiken till tillstånd, momentanvärden över HELA det föreställande tankerummet: instrumentens visade värde. Aldrig till ”system”.
(Modern akademisk Tanke är Så korkad ..).
• Newtons berömda ämbarförsök klargjorde
Newtons berömda ämbarförsök klargjorde
——————————————————————————————————
påvisandet av rörelse relativt fysikens
absoluta referens för tillstånd och tillståndets ändring — jämvikt och balans, inte ”system” —
och som inte finns representerad i fysiken som något objekt eftersom
fysiken inte innehåller något tillstånd. Men som modern akademi anser att
Newton har uppfunnit som ”det absoluta rummet”: rotationscentrum, som det får
förstås. Eller kortare: frånvaro av relativ rörelse.
Varför förstås inte det av den akademiska befolkningen 1800+? Vad är haken?
Fråga dem.
— Vad går Newtons ämbarförsök (1687) ut
på?
— Han fäster ett vattenämbar hängande i
ett långt tvinnat rep. Vartefter repet vindar upp sig och ämbaret börjar
rotera, tvingar friktionen mot väggarna vattnet att följa med — vattenytan i
ämbaret uppvisar en allt mer tydlig konkav figuryta: vattnet kryper uppåt
ämbarets väggar tills mainimal rotationsfriktion uppnås. frånvaro
av relativ rörelse.
Jämviktsreferensen är rotationscentrum-rotationsaxeln.
Eller med Newtons egna ord i den aktuella artikeln, första meningen: ”The effects which distinguish absolute
from relative motion are, the forces of receding from the axis of circular
motion.”. MEN MODERN AKADEMI FÖRSTÅR INTE KONCEPTET.
— tydligen utom den moderna akademis fattning — att en roterande kropp — ett accelererat materiellt system — INTE kan beskrivas som en kropp i vila — att vilobegreppet som något alls absolut fysikaliskt begrepp inte existerar: det finns inga vilosystem i fysikalisk mening. Iden om ett absolut vilande referenssystem — det 1800+ oerhördt starka behovet i moderna kvarter att hitta ett fysikaliskt OBJEKT för tillståndsbegreppet — är en modern akademisk uppfinning (långt) EFTER Isaac Newton. Se särskilt Albert Einsteins mening:
AbsoluteSPACE: InertialSYSTEM ¦ NoATT ¦ EARP
”Ehuru man flerstädes märker Newtons strävan att framställa sitt system såsom med nödvändighet betingat av erfarenheten och att införa så få med erfarenheten icke direkt förknippade begrepp som möjligt, uppställde han likväl begreppen absolut rum och absolut tid.”, CITAT7
MIN VÄRLDSBILD s157, Albert Einstein, BONNIERS 1934
Newtons ”absolute space” beskrivs av Newton i Andrew Mottes översättning
”Absolute space, in its own nature, without regard to anything external, remains always similar and immovable.”,
SCHOLIUM
II i DEFINITIONS, Isaac Newton PRINCIPIA 1687, till engelska av Andrew Motte
1729
• Som framgår (ytterligare) av Newtons egna särskilda förtydliganden, citaten nedan vidare, att Newton tydligen och uppenbarligen INTE talar om fysiska objekt som referens för själva uppfattandet av fysikens möjliga tillståndsbegrepp, är det av samma skäl lika tydligt i ovanstående Einsteins citat att det är Einstein — inte Newton — som inför ett föregivet, eget uppfunnet, fysiskt objekt för ”Absolute space”. Einstein — av drift, inte plan. Inte Newton.
Einstein förstår inte (eller vill inte förstå) Newton. Sol klart.
NoSYSTEM: InertialSYSTEM ¦ AbsoluteSPACE ¦ NoATT ¦ EARP
Newton klargjorde det redan tidigt.
• Se särskilt i NEWTON KLARGÖR där han i sin PRINCIPIA från 1687 DEFINITION VIII generellt och tydligt klargör från ruta ett att
”For I here design
only to give a mathematical notion of those forces, without considering their
physical causes and seats.”.
Och vidare, NEWTONS EXPLICITA KLARGÖRANDE i PRINCIPIA 1687:
”For it may be
that there is no body really at rest, to which the places and motions of others
may be referred.”,
”.. it follows
that absolute rest cannot be determined from the position of bodies in our
regions.”.
• Vad vi vet och har gått igenom och genomsökt i Newtons referenser (PRINCIPIA 1687):
• Newton framställde aldrig
någon sådan rent fysisk koppling, ingen mening alls som utpekar existensen av
något objekt eller föremål, ett s.k. referenssystem för ”Absolut space”.
• Inga sådana referenser har
upphittats.
• ”remains always similar and
immovable” = vad filmduken i biosalongen är för filmens aktörer: ett abstrakt
icke fysikaliskt påvisbart referensbegrepp i vars domän hela filmens verklighet
utspelar sig: inget fysikaliskt objekt. Inget ting. Inget föremål:
• ”remains always similar and
immovable”. Kan det sägas klarare?
Man — det undervisande styrande hävdande klientelet i moderna kvarter — förstår uppenbarligen inte vad det är Newton försöker säga. Och misstolkar det möjligen som något slags primitivt tankefel — hos Newton naturligtvis — med tillhörande uttolkningsföreträden av arten ”enligt Newton” och ”Newton menar”.
Se exemplet nedan från BKL 1924, med flera.
Men moderna litterära verk (1800+) är — just — fulla av typen nedanstående:
Jämför Modern akademi:
” Inertialsystem är enligt
Newton det absolut vilande systemet och alla system som befinner sig i likformig rörelse i förhållande till detta.”.
BONNIERS KONVERSATIONSLEXIKON Band V sp1363, BONNIERS 1924
Jämför Relaterad Fysik:
’ Inertialsystem är enligt
DEN enligt
relativitetsteorin nödvändiga MODERNA UTTOLKNINGEN AV
Newton det absolut vilande systemet och alla system som befinner sig i likformig rörelse i förhållande till detta.’
cont.
— along with adapted inventions in mathematics (WhyMAC);
Related mathematics and
physics explains — not present in modern corridors
— What wrong did modern academic ideation do?
Invented Purpose: reaching »the total explanation» —
with Modern Academy 1800+ as The Most High. Not trying to find out the
Natural Explanation — instead consistently denying any nature of such a that
kind. And?
Consensus is not a scientific subject.
CompareRelatedModernIDEA: Jun2022
GENERAL
LINES OF THINKING IN
ESTABLIHED
CORRIDORS — with
compared
related physics and mathematics
Galilei, Kepler, Newton, Bradley, Euler, Planck ..
1800+: modern akademi växer fram genom att avskriva den
naurliga klassiska fysikens förstånds-, varseblivande- och fattningsgrund:
Einstein’s
general relativity principle
— as here interpreted [EARP]:
»there are no forces
in physics, just [four dimensional] mathematical views on a maximum speed of
light: c0 = 2,99792458
T8 M/S»: no eyes. Banned STATE — by DRIFT. Not plan.
TheEINSTEINquote: CompareRealted
”Men allt detta låter misstänkt. Är det tillåtet att betrakta rörelse hos en enda kropp i hela universum? Med en kropps rörelse menar vi alltid dess lägesändring i förhållande till en annan kropp. Det strider sålunda mot sunda förnuftet att tala om en enda kropps rörelse. Den klassiska mekaniken och det sunda förnuftet råkar här i en våldsam konflikt.”,
FYSIKENS
UTVECKLING — Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld ¦ Natur och Kultur 1938 · sidan
178 ¦ DenRoterandeKroppen
Freely translated:
— »But all this sounds suspicious. Is it allowed to perceive motion of only one body in the whole universe? With a body’s motion we always mean its change of position in relation to another body. It hence contradicts common sense to talk about only one body’s motion. The classical mechanics and the common sense here encounter in a vehement conflict.»,
Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld , 1938 (The development of physics) — compare: Newton’s famous vessel experiment.
;
compare corrected, related and clarified physics:
— With a body’s motion we
always mean NOT its change of position in relation to »another body» BUT its
actual detectable instrumental conditions of any the slightest measurable CHANGE
OF present STATE of equilibrium and balance. Nothing else;
•
It pertains to all bodies, independent of type of motion, and
independent of type of view: Newton’s 3. 1687. PRINCIPIA.
— Do you surrender freely? PHYSICS FIRST
PRINCIPLE.
;
” The term CENTRIFUGAL force appears to have come about because of a mistaken perception
that there is a force that operates in the opposite direction as the
CENTRIPETAL force. But that is a misconception.”,
http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/phy00/phy00305.htm
ASK A
SCIENTIST Centripetal vs. Centrifugal Forces (2001)
;
”Centrifugal force is a virtual force. It
is not really a force.”,
source
AskAScientist as above
;
”Centrifugal force is often confused with centripetal force. Centrifugal force is most commonly introduced as an outward force apparent in a rotating frame of reference. It is apparent (fictitious) in the sense that it is not part of an interaction but is a result of rotation - with no reaction-force counterpart. This type of force is associated with describing motion in a non-inertial reference frame, and referred to as a fictitious or inertial force (a description that must be understood as a technical usage of these words that means only that the force is not present in a stationary or inertial frame).[4][5]”,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force
@INTERNET
Wikipedia — Centrifugal force, Fictitious centrifugal force
[2012-09-24]
;
” Each of the two forces can be considered the action, the other force is its associated reaction”, ActionReactionMAC
@INTERNET Wikipedia — Reaction (physics)
[2012-09-23]
;
”The conception of centrifugal
force .. as a fictitious force
arising in a rotating reference frame evolved in
the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. [citation needed]”,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centrifugal_force
@INTERNET
Wikipedia — Centrifugal force, History .. [26Jun2022]
;
”A fictitious force, also called a pseudo
force,[1] d'Alembert force[2][3] or inertial force,[4][5] is an apparent force that acts on all masses in a non-inertial
frame of reference, such as a rotating
reference frame.”,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fictitious_force
@INTERNET
Wikipedia Fictitious force, Examples of fictitious forces
[2012-09-06][26Jun2022]
INERTIAL in related physics does NOT pertain to OBJECT.
INERTIAL in related physics is a PROPERTY in physics: state: comprehension of a situation — independent of view. No physical object.
Newton’s ”vis insita”,
”… this vis insita, may, by a most significant name, be called vis inertiæ, or force of inactivity”, PRINCIPIA 1687.
• A state. Not an object; Newton’s 3rd: also basics of induction and magnetism (C1).
Related physics in TNED
After familiarizing in these
above given few but enlightening quotes: compare TheBASIC and its
more detailed TheMAL.
———————————————
Gravitationens
tidsabsoluta ekvivalent — GTaction: Gravitation’s Time Absolute Equivalent — basic
central force acceleration mathematics ¦
MIT-experimentet — The MIT-experiment: no Coriolis
FORCE connection¦ Centrifugalkraften stryks i MAC ¦
OrsaksSammanhangetCoriolis
BE NOT SURPRISED that (1800+) modern academic teaching system
was never suited to educate humanity on physics. Never was. And most definitely never will be: proven violations on physics.
BASIC EXAMPLE — FOR TEST:
WHAT is ”action” and ”reaction”?
— WEIGH a letter on a balance:
The moment the balance experiences a CHANGE
— before we have any definite idea of the weight
— atomic masses rearranges until an equilibrium has come about:
— one single unequivocal readout. Then:
• THE ACTION is apparently the change of state while
• THE REACTION is The Answer — the new state — what we can FEEL (as a result of any action, whatever):
— The readout of any instrumental result — at any moment of any process (Newton’s 3):
the reaction.
— First we SAY. Then we Wait
for The Reaction-Response. Very difficult stuff to understand in modern
corridors 1800+.
Basics from 3: denied. 1800+.
Must Invent New. You already know how these IQ-aces treat a minority ..
— There is nothing wrong with the intelligence. But look how the inducement of using it is practiced. OBLIVION: HumanRight never mentioned.
Särskilt dedikerat till Modern Akademi/Einstein — Fysikens
Andra Princip (Fysikens
7 principer), FUNTOP:
• Fysiken relaterar till JÄMVIKT (Aktion-Reaktion), inte till SYSTEM;
— Se särskilt Relaterat i VILOSYSTEMET I MODERN AKADEMI GENOM CITAT och DEN ROTERANDE KROPPEN;
• Det finns inga ”inertialsystem” i fysiken säger relaterad fysik och matematik, bevisbart i varje detalj — in till sista atomen;
• Fysikens lagar gäller FÖR systen. Inte I system.
Fysiken beskrivs genom
TILLSTÅND — som inte existerar i fysiken, inte på något som helst
möjligt begripbart relaterbart logiskt rationellt sätt: Fysikens första
Princip: Tillståndets princip — JÄMVIKT mätvärde,
instrumentfysik. Inte ”system”.
REFERENCE IS EQUILIBRIUM AND
BALANCE — related physics
REFERENSEN ÄR JÄMVIKT OCH BALANS
INGET FYSISKT OBJEKT: inget föremål
— som bioduken är för filmens aktörer: finns inte i filmens värld.
REFERENSEN ÄR JÄMVIKT OCH BALANS
JÄMVIKT equilibrium. NOT ”system”. The instrumental value — its State condition — completely independent of ”system”.
• There are no ”inertial systems” in Physics. No way. Gravitation. Electricity. Magnetism. Induction. No way.
EQUILIBRIUM AND BALANCE. Nothing else.
Referensen till fysikens variationer är inget OBJEKT, inget föremål, som modern akademi vill ha det till. Referensen till fysikens variationer är — relaterbart i varje detalj — ett BERGEPP: instrumentets mätvärde. Momentanbegreppet i ändringens variation (differentialbegreppet — möjligheten att formulera naturprocesserna matematiskt — i varje minutiös detalj).
Eftersom fysiken — tydligtvis — inte har plats för några referenssystem i någon absolut mening, och att några sådana förmodade system följaktligen heller inte kan finnas i principerna som beskriver fysiken, vore det verkligen sensationellt att få bese något enda citat från Newton själv där begreppet ”inertialsystem” utpekas — i enlighet med gängse påståenden. Men allt man finner är ”Newton menar”, och ”Newton anser” och ”Enligt Newton”. Newton citeras aldrig.
WHEREAS physics —
apparently — have no room for any
reference systems in any absolute meaning, and that any
such assumed systems consequently neither can exist in the principles
describing physics, it would indeed be sensational to witness any single quote
from Newton himself where the concept ”inertial system” is pointed out — in
accordance with established claims. But all one finds is ”Newton means”, and
”Newton thinks” and ”According to Newton”.
Newton is never quoted.
MODERN AKADEMI: ”Tröghetskrafter
är skenbara krafter” — modern
akademi kan inte relatera Aktion-Reaktion-Centralaccelerationens begrepp:
RELATERAD FYSIK: Skenbara krafter existerar inte i fysikens
värld. ALLA FYSIKENS —
NATURENS — KRAFTER ÄR VERKLIGA.
Modern akademi: sluta rata naturen som något lägre stående.
EINSTEIN — DEN MODERNA AKADEMINS ANTAGNA SYNSÄTT — FÖRSTOD INTE Galilei/Kepler/NEWTON: DEN KLASSISKA FYSIKENS ELEMENTÄRA PRINCIPER —
(Carbo). AKTION OCH REAKTION = Relaterad fysik och matematik, Atomkärnans Härledning, Planckekvivaenterna, Ljusets Gravitella Beroende, inte Einsteins Relativitetsteori: det finns inga ”inertialsystem” i fysiken säger relaterad fysik — men modern akademisk litteratur vill FÖREGE Newton som ”inertialsystemets uppfinnare”. Citat av Newton själv viar NOLL sökträffar. Däremot är den etablöerade litteraturen full av sådant som ”Eligt Newton” och Newton menar” ”och Newton anser”. Se särskilt genomgången i INERTIA.
Nature
illustrates — HINTS
AT — particle physics — what it is and what it is not: See further in ENERGY LAW.
• LAWS OF PHYSICS HOLD FOR SYSTEMS. NEVER IN SYSTEMS: there are no inertial systems in physics, says related physics;
• Modern Academic idea — invention, not deduction — of basic
physics makes it impossible to understand nature — especially on the level of
its mathematics, says related physics and mathematics:
THE WELL KNOWN IMPOSSIBLE TO
UNDERSTAND MODERN ACADEMIC attempt
of explaining THE CORIOLIS EFFECT — even very well attested to be so
inside the modern academy corridors: see full quote in MACoriolisNOTE.
Exemplified here as quoted in MainARTICLE — on the Coriolis concept , ” Clutching the teacher’s hand ..”; The Coriolis Effect (TCE).
WindBasics: WIND ¦ WindPOWER ¦ WHACNE ¦ EnergyLAW
In Swedish:
—————
Jordrotationen
flyttar omkring
redan
soluppvärmda luftmassor
vilkas inbördes så skilda
TRYCK/temperatur över stora avstånd
åstadkommer
vind (WINDspeeds in WINDproof)
— på gasfysikens egen termodynamiskt utjämnande naturs kredit.
Verksamheten verkställs så tydligen inte explicit på Solens kredit (se SimpleWINDproof),
v = (v1 = √ 3T1R/U) – (v2 = √ 3T2R/U) = (√T1·√ 3R/U) – (√T2 ·√ 3R/U)
= (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2) — General gas law equations:
v = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
Verksamheten verkställs tydligen istället enbart
PÅ JORDROTATIONENS EGET DRIVANDE termiskt fragmenterande temperatur differens skapande ENERGIKAPITAL
(Se Thermodynamical Equilibrium — hela fysikbevisningen ligger där).
Solen har ingen sådan funktion (men ingen klarhet verkar finnas i den frågan i etablerad skrift. Tvärtom: Solvärmen påstås vara vindkällan — men hela vindfysikens matematiska fysik blir omöjlig utan matematiken för centrifugering och Coriolis effekt: rotation);
vindsystemet blir med den formuleringen en fragmenterande-återställande
fysikhistoria som jagar sin egen svans utan att någonsin nå fram —
termodynamisk tröghet som styrs av elementär mekanik
WIND — kinetic energy Ekin = mFRICTIONv²/2
— defines FRICTION (heat): rotational energy
losses
• friction between a solid (Earth) and a fluid (liquid or gas: our closest the atmosphere).
Internet24Jun2022: BasicWIND
WIKIPEDIA,
Atmospheric
circulation (24Jul2022)
” The Earth’s weather is a consequence of its illumination by the Sun, and the laws of thermodynamics. The atmospheric circulation can be viewed as a heat engine driven by the Sun’s energy, and whose energy sink, ultimately, is the blackness of space. The work produced by that engine causes the motion of the masses of air, and in that process it redistributes the energy absorbed by the Earth’s surface near the tropics to the latitudes nearer the poles, and hence to space.”;
No given reference notes.
” The poleward movement of the air in the upper part of the troposphere deviates toward the east, caused by the coriolis acceleration (a manifestation of conservation of the angular momentum).”,
Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation, Hadley cell.
” The polar cell is a simple system with strong convection drivers. Though cool and dry relative to equatorial air, the air masses at the 60th parallel are still sufficiently warm and moist to undergo convection and drive a thermal loop.”,
Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation, Polar cell.
” Part of the air rising at 60° latitude diverges at high altitude toward the poles and creates the polar cell. The rest moves toward the equator where it collides at 30° latitude with the high-level air of the Hadley cell. There it subsides and strengthens the high pressure ridges beneath.”,
” The Ferrel cell is weak, because it has neither a strong source of heat nor a strong sink, so the airflow and temperatures within it are variable. .. The Hadley and polar cells are truly closed loops, the Ferrel cell is not, and the telling point is in the Westerlies, which are more formally known as ”the Prevailing Westerlies”.”,
Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation, Ferrel cell.
Wind Power Fundamentals, PDF 2007/2017
—
Alexander Kalmikov, PhD ¦ Massachusetts Institute of Technology:
” The
velocity of the air motion defines the strength of wind and is directly related to the
amount of energy in the wind,
that is -- its kinetic energy. The source of
this energy,
however, is solar radiation. The electro-magnetic radiation from the sun unevenly heats
the earth surface, stronger in the tropics and weaker in the high latitudes. Also, as a result
of a differential absorption of sun light by soil, rock, water and vegetation, air in different
regions warms up at different rate. This uneven heating is converted through convective
processes to air motion, which is adjusted by the rotation of the earth. The convective
processes are disturbances of the hydrostatic balance whereby otherwise stagnant air
masses are displaced and move in reaction to forces induced by changes in air density
and buoyancy due to temperature
differences. Air is pushed from high to low
pressure
regions, balancing friction and inertial forces due to the rotation of the earth.”.
Fundamentals of wind energy, PDF 2015
— Wei
Tong ¦ Kollmorgen Corporation, Virginia, USA
” Among all factors affecting the
wind generation, the uneven solar radiation on
the
earth’s surface is the most important and critical one.”,
” Wind results from the movement of air due to atmospheric pressure gradients”.
Office
of ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE
ENERGY
Wind
Energy Basics — Wind Energy Technologies Office
” Wind energy is actually a byproduct of the sun.”.
PDF —
no mentioned source inside the writ
AIR PRESSURE
AND WIND
” Wind
results from a horizontal difference in air pressure and
since the sun heats different
parts of the Earth
differently, causing pressure differences, the Sun is the driving force
for
most winds.”, all marked text is added here from this author, unless
same original.
Apparently
a safely established World idea:
Internet Search
"and
since the sun heats different parts"
BingSearch:
30Jun2022
"and since the sun heats different parts"
53 100 results
" Wind results from a horizontal difference in air
pressure and since the sun heats different
parts of the Earth
differently, causing pressure differences, the Sun is the driving force for
most winds"
77pdfs.com ›
air-pressure-and-winds-worksheet-pdf
https://apple.norushcharge.com ›
common-questions › what-is-caused-by-differences-in-air-pressu
https://ariella-bogspothicks.blogspot.com
https://bookssdzvhi.blogspot.com › 2020 › 11 ›
descargar-air-pressure-and-wind.html
https://brainly.com › question › 11325097
https://gomy.jonsimsauctioneering.com ›
why-does-wind-blow-from-high-pressure-to-low-pressure
https://sciencebriefss.com › physics ›
so-how-exactly-does-pressure-affect-wind
https://www.caagesf.org › faq ›
faq-why-are-some-winds-stronger-than-others.html
https://www.coursehero.com › file › 148575620
› Upload-5docx
https://www.tiempo.com › ram › 397 ›
analisis-detallado-de-la-ciclogenesis-prevista
..
Other »Wind-cause is the Sun»:
https://www.nationalgeographic.org ›
encyclopedia › wind
Wind | National Geographic Society
Wind is the movement of air caused by the uneven heating of the Earth by the sun.
..
https://www.eia.gov › energyexplained › wind
Wind explained - U.S. Energy Information
Administration (EIA)
17 dec. 2021 Wind is caused by uneven heating of the earth's surface by the sun.
With further — apparently safely established in The World Jun2022. See
also Swedish Energy Authority: ”Wind energy has its
origin in the sun.”. Jepp.
Authority. MustBuyBook. ”Learn more”.
»Conditions were more favorable year 1311».
See How MAC defends »The Transgression», further
below:
StanfordRef: Internet24Jun2022
WebSearch 19May2019 »wind power slows earth rotation»
QUORA — 5 Answers — ”Do wind
turbines slow down the rotation of the earth?”:
Do
wind turbines slow Earth’s rotation?
QUORA:
https://www.quora.com/Do-wind-turbines-slow-down-the-rotation-of-the-earth
” No because angular momentum is
conserved and wind turbines can’t transfer Earth’s angular momentum
to other bodies like the Moon or the Sun. The energy extracted from the wind comes
entirely from the Sun’s radiation, which heats the atmosphere nonuniformly.”,
COMPUTER
SCIENCE & PHYSICS, STANFORD UNIVERSITY (1972), Answered Jul 12, 2018
WindOnEARTH: Stanford ¦ WindBASICS
STANFORD UNIVERSITY, PLEASE — angular momentum J = m · v · r :
————————————————————————————————
Wind turbines takes — reduces — on Earth’s angular momentum (The2003NASArticle) through friction energy losses E = Fd = m(v12 – v02)/2,
the 1832 Coriolis’ first theorem. See also Q1: — attested established ”with mixed feelings” on »angular momentum conservation» in Earth wind issues;
• Friction, energy heat losses, is the Issue no doubt — and our Sun definitely does not generate or connect Coriolis effects. But Earth’s rotational centrifugation does so; The Sun is just »warming the box — naturally unevenly between front and back, solid and semi-solid». While rotation — cooling and fragmenting thermal equilibrium — generates wind. Or, can so be interpreted to generate wind — by the temperature differences (causing pressure gradients) caused by the constant cooling machinery: rotation. So, no doubt, yes: wind turbines do slow Earth’s rotation — if used during any longer periods in any significant amounts.
Compare the 600GW-Example-Math. Sun in itself has no Earth wind generating physical capacity: no such mathematics exists: searched for, none yet found.
Independent: WindOnEARTH
Why not THAT (very simple and direct) description from
Modern Academy 1800+?
Test answer (PopularOBJECTION):
Abandoning classic physics, beginning to INVENT ideas
to suite A New Modern Scientifical Costume of 1800+ Invented New Logics, paved
university roads for Education;
• IT
”suicided” its native true universal natural comprehension of Nature. See
WHACNE,
and below.
— Today Jun2022 nobody can understand — intuitively grasp — natural processes on modern academic nomenclature. No way. Proof: Ask the pedestrian.
INDIVIDUAL INDEPENDENCY — the ability to Relate physics — seems not to be the most famous pet in modern quarters.
Summing the impressions:
1. Modern academy invented (or rather adopted from EARP Einstein’s general relativity principle) its Inertial System — which definitely and very mildly spoken has Issues on ”A Rotating System” (forbidden according to Einstein; see EARP Quote in The Rotating Body) — along with:
2. the corresponding Invented-ADAPTED-Academic-Consented modern academic Vector algebra — WHICH AND EVEN MAKES THE EXPLAINING SITUATION exponentially WORSE (Compare The MIT-example and Vector calculus’ collapse in modern academy — also in magnetism and induction on The Expansion Integral with 3 comparing examples in Treatise).
Modern academy is apparently by nature examples outnumbered as PRIMITIVE relative related physics.
See also in explicit PLANCK EQUIVALENTS directly compared to Einstein’s Equations
— and The List with EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS.
• Physics holds FOR systems/bodies. Not IN them (that was a real low idea, apparently 1800+ created).
The reference is EQUILIBRIUM (Compare The Einstein Quote)
— instrumental readouts experimental physics: WHAT IS FELT and SENSED.
NOT ”system”. In every thinkable comprehensive moment.
WindSpeeds: INDEPENDENT
Some
Basic Measured Trade wind data
”The Tradewinds, which are
the dominant forces for surface waves of the Shelf most of the year (Fig.2),
become most intense between December and March. Data for the Corn Islands [America-Caribbean area] indicate that winds blow steadily from the ENE at 7-10 m s—1,
with a steadiness factor of 90% (Roberts and Suhayda 1983) for most of the
year.”,
SCIENCE DIRECT —
sciencedirect.com (20Jun2022) — Tradewind
GROUND WIND SPEEDS TABLE
¦ BASIC WIND REFERENCE TABLE
WIND SPEED AND AVERAGE TEMPERATURE
Internet search 29Jun2022:
Trade winds
average 5-6 M/S (air current ¦ Britannica; https://www.britannica.com), termed easterlies (stronger in winter).
Northern hemisphere: Trade winds
are blowing from northeast.
Southern hemisphere: Trade winds
are blowing from southeast.
North pole
annual average temperature: –0.7 °C (North Pole climate: Average Temperature ¦ https://en.climate-data.org)
South pole annual
average temperature: –25 °C ( minimum at December-January ¦ https://sciencequery.com)
EQUATOR average
temperature (What
Is Th Average Temperature on the Equator? ¦ https://www.reference.com): 18-27 °C:
”This average takes into account temperatures during
both the day and night. Those temperatures are average temperatures”
[Dayside] .......................................... 27 °C [Zenith ¦ no exact available data]
[Nightside] ....................................... 18 °C
---------------
”zenith average temperature” — not found
”insolation temperature” — has articles — but
seemingly without specific temperature values ..
AND NOT ALL WEBSITES THESE DAYS (2018+) ARE ACCESSIBLE
UNLESS FORCED TO ACCEPT COOKIES
— not our table (HumanRight is
excluded: never related: never mentioned: never referred to: have a nice day).
• As the
source says: ”Those temperatures are average temperatures”: The ZENITH
temperature — any absolute highest topmost inslotaion temperature on any spot
on Earth — preferentially on the line Sun-Earth stright on — seems to have no
direct available data.
• Comparing
Seweden during Summer (60°N) som events during early HOT summer morings show
(very) high temperature values:
— 15Aug2015 ¦ 07:48 ¦ 52.3 °C ¦ 126.14 °F.
— Taken on the inslotation hot spot on Earth, it is
likely that its (annual average) temperature (maybe difficult to measure)
should be (very) much mor than the (average max) 27°C.
• The
reason for our interest: v² = 3TR/U: the average gas molecule velocity
as site — for comparison with other sites, for calculating the difference in
M/S — hence a rough estimate om max WIND SPEED in gas equilibrium restoration
(which never happens but is aimed at due to heat flow from warm to cold: the
Earth’s rotational centrifugal force, driving/pushing the whole weather system
by fragmenting any ideal gas balance, which never happens, and restoring it
from pressure differences, which never happens either. See Illustrated WindOnEARTH,
related physics deductions).
————————————————————————————————————
WIND — friction — APPEARS FIRST ON A ROTATING BODY — NEVER
BEFORE ¦
————————————————————————————————————
pV =
kT; p = T(k/V) ¦ v =
√ 3TR/U ¦ R = 8314.9148
J/[KG°K] general gas constant ¦ T = Uv2/3R — From well
known General Gas Law Mathematics
— Calculating the Oxygen (U=32) v-difference
between 50°C and –0.7°C yields an average gas molecular velocity difference of
• 41.1 M/S
¦ Oxygen U=32 (21%) ........ ¦ 501.9 –
460.8
• 43.9 M/S
¦ Nitrogen U=28 (78%) ...... ¦ 536.6 –
492.7
— When Earth rotation’s centrifugal force
pushes/fragments (ideal) gas equilibrium from NORTH pole to equator (gas mechanical
compression), a corresponding sucking back-push equator-to-pole apparently
involves a top restoring wind speed of (maximum) 40 M/S — as reckoned from
present fairly familiar Earth data.
— The average corresponding between dayside (27) and
nightside (18):
• 7.3 M/S ¦
Oxygen U=32 (21%) ........ ¦ 483.7 –
476.4
• 7.8 M/S ¦
Nitrogen U=28 (78%) ...... ¦ 517.1 –
509.3
— Corresponding value for SOUTH pole (minimum –25°C)
to equator (as above estimated 50°C):
• 62.1 M/S
¦ Oxygen U=32 (21%) ........ ¦ 501.9 –
439.8
• 66.4 M/S
¦ Nitrogen U=28 (78%) ...... ¦ 536.6 –
470.2
These corresponding wind velocity values are
apparently the opposed raw return wind results from Earth’s rotational (semi
solid Coriolis associated) centrifugal push on corresponding (but never
realized) gas pressure differences (friction between Earth ground and the fluid
gas) as the centrifugal force pushes gas from pole to equator.
CONCLUSION
In any case, the wind strength in pushing
(centrifugal) and restoring (gas pressure normalization) is determined by the
maximum temperature differences. Meaning:
• Earth’s
constant rotation generates all wind energy from temperature differences,
mainly between pole and equator (insolation zenith). The morphology of this
system is determined by all the associated particular phenomen: Coriolis
Effect, apparently shaping the spiralling weather cells with differences in gas
pressure and temperature.
MAXIMUM RELATABLE WIND SPEED
as derived from WindOnEARTH
for a given molecular (U) gas composition
v = (v1 = √ 3T1R/U) – (v2 = √ 3T2R/U) = (√T1·√ 3R/U) – (√T2 ·√ 3R/U)
= (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2) — General gas law equations:
v = (√ 3R/U)(√T1–√T2)
ONLY DEPENDS ON THE RELATIVE TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES generated by THE EARTH ROTATIONAL CENTRIFUGAL COMPRESSING GAS PUSH FROM POLE TO EQUATOR securing a back-push between equator (warm) and pole (cold).
— The actual heat flow, average insolation temperature, from the Sun apparently has no connection to the actual wind energy output.
— The heat from the Sun only works as a form factor — with apparently zero wind energy input
(here in UH previously 2012¦2019 unrelated)
• The Sun heat insolation physics makes no contribution to Earth wind energy. It is all Earth rotation (Coriolis) mechanics and gas physics:
E = mv2/2 = m[(√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)]2/2; NO particular SUN:
E = (3mR/U)[T1+T2
– 2√T1T2]/2
” Wind results from the movement of air due to atmospheric pressure gradients”,
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022
• Absolutely.
SomeAfterMATH:
Jun/Jul2022 — WindSPEEDS
SOME AFTERMATH
After several tedious attempts
— all leaving unsatisfactory tails of unclear resolutions ..
COMPARING THE
INTERNET QUOTES Jun2022 — how the phenomena of WIND is
interpreted
AFTERMATH 30Jul2022
Previous UH-documents (FysikensGrundGTaction2012 ¦ zGMR2019) on the WIND issue could NOT clarify the (very) tricky Quest of placing »the insolation reheating» of »de-warmed» Earth surface regions — the wind generating associates identified in established literature — as, typical (InternetQuotes)
” The atmospheric circulation can be viewed as a heat engine driven by the Sun’s energy”,
WIKIPEDIA, Atmospheric circulation (24Jul2022)
” The velocity of the air motion defines the strength of wind .. The source of this energy, however, is solar radiation”,
Wind Power Fundamentals, PDF 2007/2017
” Among all factors affecting the
wind generation, the uneven solar radiation on the
earth’s surface is the most important and critical one.”,
Fundamentals of wind energy, PDF 2015
— Wei
Tong ¦ Kollmorgen Corporation, Virginia, USA
As specified by the Tong2015 sentence: the Quest (also here in UH) is about ”the uneven solar radiation”: its understanding — and its thermal and mechanical physics. Not really its mathematics, as it has been observed;
• UNDERSTANDING the dynamics behind, also well observed in modern corridors, is the tricky part as testified:
“ 3. Frustration and confusion?
The mathematics involved in the derivation of the Coriolis force is quite straightforward, at least in comparison with other parts of meteorology, and cannot explain the widespread confusion that obviously surrounds it [for a recent example see an article by Kearns (1998) in Weatherwise]. The late Henry Stommel appreciated the sense of frustration that overcomes students in meteorology and oceanography who encounter the “mysterious” Coriolis force as a result of a series of “formal manipulations”:”,
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
http://www.aos.princeton.edu/WWWPUBLIC/gkv/history/Persson98.pdf
Persson1998 continues by quoting,
” Clutching the teacher’s hand .. And some people prefer never to look over the side again.”,
See full quote in Persson1998¦2. The Persson1998 text continues in further specifying the heart of the matter, as understood:
”This article will suggest that the main problem with the teaching of the Coriolis force does not lie so much with the mathematics of the derivation, but the purely kinematic nature of the derivation. It readily provides the “approved” answer, but the price to pay is a pedagogical difficulty to bridge the gap between this formalistic approach and a genuine physical understanding.”, p1374
:
” It remains a topic for historical research to find out why and how angular momentum conservation, in spite of the previous scientific objections, in the late 1940s became established as the key to understand the general circulation.”,
” Although its basis was never theoretically challenged, except by James (1953), its has been accepted with mixed feelings.”, p1381
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
’ A genuine physical understanding’ apparently it is. Not explicitly the mathematics of it (the math part is the least of our problems, unless otherwise advised). See in explicit from TheBASIC.
The problem is not the filling up of gasoline in The Vehicle.
The problem is in what Hole we should put it ..
Corrections: PlanckRadiation
Not until the basics in THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM was recently clarified in this present production — and so left with an open door for anyone to disclaim, or state flaws or errors in — the complete station named Understanding did finally arrive under our rails (we had to install a more powerful engine during the journey ..).
All statements, claims and meanings of the named preceding UH-documents connecting to the simple but deep central understatement issue — The role of the Sun as limited, if at all in formulation in those writs — should have been straightened out, as explained in this GMR2022 document.
See in explicit — every single explaining detail — from THERMODYNAMICAL EQUILIBRIUM in EarthWIND FUNDAMENTALS.
Meaning: The former documents, as far as imprecise or even possibly faulty, now — thereby — have earned the status of an archive and reference case history documentation in UH. What we know (here): The math properties are not explicitly involved in this limitation. The whole issue only lies in referring the (understanding of the) causing agent involved in the Coriolis (wind) effect: Earth’s rotation. Patience: the thermodynamical equilibrium has all the answers, it says.
So: No changes whatsoever have been made in these previous documents for corrections — on details even, so possibly, not yet resolved — still open for questioning. And so they will stay.
See also established quotes here in
OUR REMARKABLE CULTURE OF
SCIENTIFIC INSIGHT
TCE: Corrections
The
Coriolis Effect — as deduced from TheBASIC ¦ Coriolis’ first theorem
(Kraftupptagande)
MASSPÅVERKAN UTMED CENTRIFUGALKRAFTENS VEKTORRIKTNING
(Inertial)
Mass affection along the centrifugal force-vector direction
Meaning
of Inertial here (also Newton, if correctly apprehended):
any
physical mass related action involving a change of a given present state (Newton’s 3:rd), whatever.
OR
SHORTER:
anything
that sucks (centrifugal) force
Only
Kinetic Energy based physics Ekin=mv²/2 — nothing else (Gaspard Coriolis’ two
theorems 1835, Persson1998)
CLASSIFICATION
(WindVORTEXphysics ¦ CoriolisAnalogies):
MASSPÅVERKAN
UTMED CENTRIFUGALKRAFTENS VEKTORRIKTNING ¦ along That Line which defines —
measueres — rotation
(Inertial)
Mass affection — path deviation
potential in solid materials, or real in semi-solids — along a specific
centrifugal force-vector line (cenLINE) direction
The Coriolis
Effect — 2Jun2022 (MainARTICLE) ¦ TCE
from Gaspard Coriolis 1835 with additional notes from
Persson1998¦2005, see from Coriolis ¦ Coriolis’ two theorems ¦ The
5 Coriolis propositions ¦ CORRECTIONS
certifying that the Debates and Students Frustrations
have followed the subject consistently ..
is in related meaning a KINETIC (real or potential
¦ The
COR2 Examination) structural
change (whirls from a complementary rotational
acceleration pressure
ωv[r]) in a semi-solid material system of one (ω) or
several (ω0) rotating bodies — as a result of the semi-solid mass’ systems
centrifugation-rotation-radial
[• ... → vr] motions (v[r])
— NOT out-throwing projectiles in free air or
space from a shooting station (these are Kinematic
Coriolis) also hinted at in
established corridors:
Persson1998, 3: Persson1998, 1
” It goes beyond the scope of this article to discuss
the misuse of kinematic conceptual models, except
when the Coriolis force is
directly involved. This is
the case with the pedagogical use of angular momentum
conservation to explain certain features in the
general circulation.”, p1380
European
Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
—
HOW
DO WE UNDERSTAND THE CORIOLIS FORCE?, Anders Persson (1998)
http://www.aos.princeton.edu/WWWPUBLIC/gkv/history/Persson98.pdf
är i relaterad mening en strukturändring (virvlar från roterande
komplementära accelerationstryck ωv[r])
i ett halvfast materialsystem hos en (ω) eller flera (ω0) roterande
kroppar — som följd av det halvfasta masssystemets rotationsradiella rörelser (v[r])
— INTE utkastande projektiler i fri öppen luft eller rymd
från en avfyrningsstation (sådana tillhör Kinematiken)
Archer2012Ref: Corrections
Reference Quantity for
comparison — the only basic we have Jun2022:
Archer measures 2012
¦ E=Pt (Joule = WS; 1W = 1J/S)
THE ARCHER 2012 MEASURED
1700 T(W=J/S) WIND REFERENCE
BingSearch:
30Jun2022
"Cristina Archer and
Mark Z. Jacobson presented a"
42 results
THE WIKIPEDIA HIT as quoted in the
search hit table
HAS NO LONGER THAT WIKIPEDIA QUOTE IN the advised
search hit
WIKIPEDIA Wind Power (!)
— so: where is THAT one now 2022? Not in
Wikipedia anyway. Apparently. Internet sometimes has a weired type of behavior
..
” Cristina Archer and Mark Z.
Jacobson presented a "bottom-up" estimate, which unlike Kleidon's are
based on actual measurements of wind speeds,
and found that there is 1700 TW
of wind power at an altitude of 100 metresover
land and sea.”, Wikipedia Wind power May2019.
SOME RECKONING REFERENCES
FOR PRACTICAL COMPARISON:
— how much air for how
much wind energy (by Archer’s 100M altitude)?
E = Pt = t · 1.7 T15 W = t · mv²/2 ¦ t
= 1S: ¦ E = 1.7 T15 J = mv²/2 ;
The air mass involved in any estimated
or measured wind energy quantity can be calculated as an average rough
m =
2 × 1.7 T15 J/v² . And the wind average for given m
v =
√ 2 × 1.7 T15 J/m = √ 2 × 1.7 T15 J/AhD: EarthAREA, altitude
hEIGHT, airDensity
EXAMPLE. A 100 M high air column
approximates the air volume EarthArea × 100 = 5.11 T16 M³.
A general air grounde density of 1.3
KG/M³ = m/V =D gives the air mass m=VD
m = 6.65 T16
KG (some 1% of the Earths total atmospheric mass, 5.3 T18 KG);
THEN with a measured/estimated total
global available wind power/energy of 1.7 T15 J a 100 meter above the ground,
the average wind velocity (v) for taking out that amount of energy will be
v = 0.2262
M/S = √ 2E/m.
•
It is a reference (Archer measures 2012)
for further.
— The text part in UniverseHistory in
association with that reference
Mäts vindenergin upp och slås ut över
ett årsmedelvärde — eller annat troligt medelvärde — får man i vilket fall ett
MOMENTANVÄRDE (Joule) på aktuellt energiinnehåll — oavsett teori om hur länge
energibanken existerar eller inte.
is NOT further related (the source information is partly limited, and the
actual text paragraph’s suggestion here above is, what we know, inappropriate).
WINDmass: Archer2012 ¦ WACHNE
PRINCIPLE
Graphical
representation of the Archer wind measure reference
based on
the estimated Archer 2012 specified h = 100 M altitude preference
Simplified
T ¦ t in UH for 10^± : T for 10^+, t for 10^–
Total
available (at h=100M): E = 1700 TeraJ/S = 1.7 T15 J/S with a 1.3 KH/M³ m= 6.643
T16 KG air
with an
average wind velocity (E = mv²/2) of vAV = 0.2 M/S — in the action of a
friction air wind lag over the Earth’s surface blowing from east to west (
W←E = v ¦ net Trade wind quantity):
The total average wind speed directions per second on the
[annual] average wind energy 1.7 T15 J/S
related to the symmetrical central straight line average
calculated Earth rotational wind speed [Easterly v]
The general wind mass constant [over
shorter time periods]
linear
momentum quantity:
p=mv = m/n · vn = mn · v/n.
Any arbitrary symmetric curve will reflect the different
possible wind speed directions summing the v-quantity:
• By friction
losses — from [the NASA article
report]
surface winds [and inner Earth mantle semi solid layers] Earth rotation constantly loses
rotational speed [by very small amounts]. However:
• Exactly the amount
of wind power extracted from Earth ground wind turbine engines — that is: an
additional friction factor added to Earth’s natural environmental physics —
will reduce the Earth’s rotation by that same quantity.
If the extracted
power is significant during any significant period of time, the length of the
Earth’s day will also increase significantly — with anthropogenic corresponding
effects. See reckoning examples in the VK600GW Example.
” Friktionsmotståndet, som man
aldrig helt kan göra sig kvitt, är naturligtvis anledningen till att det i
praktiken krävs en kraft även för att vidmakthålla en rörelse med konstant
hastighet.”.
FOCUS MATERIEN
1975,s68sp1n, freely translated
Friction
resistance, as one never completely can get rid of, is of course the reason for
that it — in practice — is demanding a force even to uphold a motion with
constant velocity.
— Meaning: a moving — rotating
→ — solid body with a fluid or gas above its (ideal flat) surface always
develops one or another form of friction — a lag ← — as long as the
rotation prevails. It is basic simple mechanics on the level of 5 [or even 2].
IDEALISTS IN OUR TIME CLAIMING (type Swedish Energy Authority SEM)
”Wind
energy has its origin in the sun.”
HAVE THE implied, not really related IDEA THE THE
FRICTION LOSSES ARE REFILLED — RESTORED — BY THE SUN:
Meaning — in straight words:
— »Our Sun generates Earth
rotational energy to compensate for the air frictional losses with ground
based constructions».
Must absolutely buy book. Sweden
is definitely on the Up of »A TOTAL RECALL OF» Inducements in using natural
Intelligence: what nature did provide: brains.
Absolutely. Very advanced stuff.
More fair (not Sweden only has
IT): Half the world seems to have the same attitude. See InternetQUOTESJun2022.
Also: Compare Stanford University on WindOnEARTHbasics.
Also
note the linear momentum’s p=mv mass velocity general basic
physical mathematics — PREFIXxSIN:
p = mv = mn · v/n = m/n · vn = mv:
• Low
wind speed on high mass density [near Earth ground — heaviest carbon
dioxide CO2, U=44] CAN
• conserve exactly the same total average constant mass flow mv as
• High
wind speed on low mass density [higher up — lightest: Nitrogen N2,
U=28]:
v = √ 2 ×
Energy/AREAheightDENSITY — ±EastWest
—
If we are seeking some raw basic data for [basic Earth physics] energy
comparisons, the relevant data then should be the mass wind mv, not the wind
speed [v] as such; p=mv=F/t=E/td=P/d: W/M — the available pushing wind force F
per t time unit.
• HIGH WIND SPEED on low air gas density =
LOW WIND SPEED on high air gas density — same net pushing force.
The
graphical representation (hence) visualizes how the wind energy average wind
velocity in any direction can be distributed by principle — in any kind of
symmetric manner (with a corresponding »hard
to prove» by measurement on a total global annual scale). The same end
result is given anyway by symmetric sums of actual wind velocity quantities on
• arbitrary wind directions with (Eastward) or
against (Westward) the Earth’s rotational direction.
The Bottom Line:
says world
scientific community — with Business Enterprise as »THE
Leading Pet»:
•
Extracting wind energy on Earth is a practically free and very
environmental friendly nature caring energy source with practically zero — none
— environmental issue — in any deeper sense.
Meaning,
says related
physics:
•
World scientific consensus is about to kill everything on Earth belonging
to a NATURAL environmental preference — by DRIFT. Not plan. How, why? Test
answer: Basic ignorance guided by an 1800+ specifically scientifically
developed STUPIDITY. Provable in every detail — and as
already seen by the eye:
SWEDEN 2018
•
World established scientific community does NOT — apparently in to the
last atom — understand physics: it is apparently dictating it
— with corresponding Natural Responses
(WhyMAC).
Or shorter, AS PROVED:
World
established scientific community cannot relate physics. Someone, please: step
forward and disclaim that by argument. And 100% will
absolutely surrender immediately.
— I never
wanted it to come to this. No way: Proof
3. Dodge
that the one who can.
There should not be one single too difficult detail to explain, or relate, from the point of view of these basic Earth rotational wind generating matehmatics — WindOnEARTHbasics ¦ AllMathWindBASICS ¦ WindPROOF.
VindbegreppetRelaterat, Jul2022; SAMMANSTÄLLT 27Jul2022 — THE WIND
CONCEPT, AS RELATED FROM THE BASIC AND THE WIND PROOF
AND VortexPhysics AND BASIC WIND
REFERENCE and WindMassCalculation
Från TheBASIC och TheSimpleWindPROOF
och VortexPhysics
SOLVÄRMEN ÅSTADKOMMER INGEN AVKYLNING.
MEN JORDROTATIONEN GÖR DET
— SÅ ATT VIND kan UPPKOMMA — GENOM TEMPERATURSKILLNADER:
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
INSOLATION ACCOMPLISHES NO COOLING EFFECT.
BUT EARTH’S ROTATIONS DOES PRECISELY THAT.
SO THAT WIND can GENERATE through TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1 – √T2)
DEN RELATERADE FYSIKENS DEFINITION PÅ
BEGREPPET VIND
På Jordytan med sin överliggande gravitellt sammanhållna gasmassa
DEN RELATERADE FYSIKENS DEFINITION PÅ BEGREPPET VIND,
som det får förstås:
— På Jordytan med sin överliggande gravitellt sammanhållna gasmassa:
• Löpande temperaturändringar genereras inte av Solen.
• Löpande temperaturändringar genereras av Jordrotationen.
Det vi kallar för VIND (avkylning):
Solvärmen håller enbart Jordlådan VARM. Inte vindad;
Allmänna gaslagen pV=kT på en fast volym (V) — vår närmaste troposfär — visar p=T(k/V) att
• temperatur (T) och tryck (p) är proportionella.
k definieras traditionellt vid Jordekvatorn (STP, Standard Temperature and Pressure) vid 0°C och normaltrycket 101 325 Pa:
k = p(1M³)/273.15°K = 370.9500275 J/°K ¦ [(p=F/A) · V = Fd = E, Joule];
Allmänna gaslagens utlösta samband för en viss gasmassas temperatur (T) ges av sambandet
v = √ 3RT/U — R allmänna gaskonstanten, T temperaturen, U gasmassans atomvikt, v de inneslutna gasmolekylernas medelhastighet vid T.
Temperaturskillnaden — maximalt utjämnande vindhastighet — mellan två olika gasområden T1 och T2 ges då på formen
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1
– √T2)
Den drivande motorns matematiska fysik är heller
inte överdrivet komplicerad att förklara;
— Ett badrumsexperiment visar principen (speciellt
upplysande för populationerna runt 5):
Virvelbildningens enkla
köksfysik:
ELEMENTÄR JORDFYSIKALISK VINDTEORI
p = mv = m/n · vn = mn · v/n = p = constant
Based on The Practical Vortex
Physics Experiment
TESTING THE CENTRIFUGAL WIND-PUSH THEORY
Exemplifying The Northern Hemisphere
GRAVITATIONEN — CENTRIFUGALKRAFTEN — GENERERAR
VIRVELN. INTE SOLVÄRMEN
— VARFÖR OMSKRIVS INTE DEN tydligt möjliga ASPEKTEN I ETABLERAD LITTERATUR I ÄMNET? Eftersökt. Inte ännu upphittat (27Jul2022).
På samma sätt som virveln bildas i badkaret eller tvätthon genom ett SUG UNDERIFRÅN, kan tydligen Jordkroppens roterande centrifugalkrafter på den nära Jordytan överliggande gasmassan förstås generera ett polärt undertryck med ett motsvarande ekvatoriellt övertryck.
Jordkroppens i det närmaste konstanta rotationshastighet garanterar att en bestämd gasmassa (m) påtvingas en bestämd centrifugalkraftsgenererad medelhastighet (v) pol-ekvator med en bestämd vindmassa (mv): mv kan fördelas godtyckligt i olika regioner massa-hastighet på ovanstående linjära momentform (IMPULSEN p=mv).
Ekvatoriella övertrycket — på minsta möjliga hastighet pol-ekvator med mesta möjliga gasmassa — garanterar att samma gasmassa kan återvända ekvator-pol över en längre — atmosfäriskt högre — vägsträcka på högre hastighet med mindre massfördelning med fortfarande totalt konstant bevarad vindmassa p=mv.
Vindmassan (mv) kan kontrolleras praktiskt om man känner något (medelbaserat) mätvärde (P=E/t ¦ Archer2012: 1700 TW, Huang2014: 750 TW) på någon maximal vindeffekt över ett bestämt höjdintervall (h¦Archer2012: 100 M) — samt att vi förfogar (FOCUS MATERIEN 1975s514) över någon allmän global vinduppmätt latitud-altitud sommar-vinter tabell (samlade forskningsdata upp till 1970-talet) med specificerade vindriktningskomponenter väst-öst (W, E) — till jämförande resultatprövning;
P/t = E = mv²/2; m=VD; D(h=100M) ~ 1.3 KG/M³; V = Jordytan·h ~ 5.11 T16 M³;
m ~ 6.7 T19 KG — ca 1.25% av totala Jordatmosfärens massa (grovt 5.3 T18 KG)
vMIN(Archer2012) = √ 2E/m = 0.2262 M/S
vMIN(Huang2014) = √ 2E/m = 0.1502 M/S
Med vindmassans ekvivalenter
(m/n)/(mn) = (v/n)/(vn) = 1.25% kan vi tydligen lösa ut ett MAX(vn):
(vn) = (v/n)/1.25% = ;
(Archer2012) = 0.2262/1.25% = 18.040 M/S
(Huang2014) = 0.1502/1.25% = 11.982 M/S
Medelvärde: 15.011 M/S
FOCUS MATERIEN 1975s514 GLOBALA MEDELVÄRDET FÖR
ALTITUDER 0-100 KM SOMMAR-VINTER NORRA HALVKLOTET VISAR:
genomsnittliga vindhastighetskomponenten VästÖst: 15 M/S
från väst till öst.
Wind Speed
Table in M/S — compiled from the FM1975 source’s illustrated West-East
wind components specifications on 0-100KM altitudes and latitudes 0-90 for
Northern Hemisphere conditions.
Positive vales denote Westerly winds (blowing from
West to East). negative values Easterlies.
SAMMANSTÄLLNINGEN AV FOCUS MATERIEN uppgifterna visar ett totalt västligt (från väster mot öster) medelvärde på
15.100 M/S.
• Medelvärdet från de oberoende mätningarna (Archer2012, Huang2014) som ovan:
15.011 M/S.
• Vi kan alltid kalla det för ett osannolikt (mycket) träffsäkert resultatvärde (99.41%).
— Men vi behöver (åtskilligt) mera bekräftelser på att teorin verkligen kan förklara samtliga observationer — utan gnöt och gnäll om ”brist på resurser”. Should be A walk in the park.
VYERNA NEDAN SEDDA OVANIFRÅN NORDPOLEN — allmänna primära
vindriktningar mark-höjd vi den redan välkända
Corioliseffekten:
centrifugalstyrd massformändring [Persson1998 citat1 och citat2]
p = mv = m/n
· vn = mn · v/n = p = constant
GROVBILDEN MED GASMASSANS ALLMÄNNA STRÖMNINGSFORMER,
norra halvklotet, dagsida och nattsida enligt p=mv-formens
centrifugala fysik
Flödesschemat för Jordytans
vädersystem enligt gängse uppfattningar. Sammanställt från uppgifter i
Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation 24Jul2022
En stor del av hela vindsystemets förklaring förefaller ha ett alldeles eget ”centrum” — inkluderat den etablerade vetenskapshistorien om hur man menat att det hela fungerar.
Mittcellen ovan (FERREL cell) — hela bandet med de kända tre atmosfäriska cirkulerande områden som representerar Jordytans vädersystem — beskrivs (Wikipedia, Atmospheric circulation, 24Jul2022) som ”weak” — och »skapad» och underhållen av de bägge omgivande Polcellen och HADLEY cellen.
I etablerad mening anses, eller underförstås — inga direkta citat verkar finnas — Polcellen och Hadley cellen vara »slutna självunderhållande konvektionssystem» : de underhålls/cirkulerar oavbrutet av Solvärmen genom »självkonvektion»: Solen värmer upp mera mot ekvatorn än polerna, och därigenom uppkommer »naturliga gasrörelser», menar man — underförstått: direkta citat verkar inte finnas, inte alls. Wikipedia (Jul2022) omnämner ingenting om Jordrotationen som ansvarig maskin för vindunderhållet. Allt relateras istället etablerat till Solvärmen som vindkraftens upphov;
” The Earth’s weather is a consequence of its illumination by the Sun, and the laws of thermodynamics.”, Wikipedia 2022 InternetQUOTES
I RELATERAD FYSIK DÄREMOT: De enkla beräkningarna som ligger till grund för centrifugalmodellens teori (WindPROOF ¦ VortexPHYSICS) visar och bevisar ett Coriolis maximum för Jordytan vid idealt exakta 45° latitud. Beroende på projektiva komponenter (sommar-vinter), nära eller strax ovanför den fasta Jordytan, finns ett sådant Coriolis maximum latitudellt område mellan 37-60°. Det är ganska precis samma som den angivna FERREL cellens område — som också påstås variera och förskjutas sommar-vinter.
The centrifugal
acceleration on Earth’s surface points — partly perpendicular to Earth’s
rotational axis, and partly projected on that measure along the Earth’s
surface. The latter defines the actual Coriolis acceleration values — with a
maximum peek at 45° latitude — with an ideal thermal equator perpendicular to
Earth’s rotational axis.
IF the centrifugal push theory holds, this
Coriolis peak should have a corresponding connecting point or region where the
pole-equator pushed air makes an equivalent to the returned equator-pole air
(however on different altitudes, forming a permanent circulation — or a such
reference; No further related exists on this part in this production).
Det området uppvisar så ledes följande fason i Coriolis effektens väl relaterbara ljus:
— Markdelens flöde upp mot nordpolen ger en Coriolis effekt med avböjning österut;
— Höjddelens flöde ner mot ekvatorn ger en Coriolis effekt med avböjning västerut;
— Den cirkulerande slutna formen tecknar i projektion som i figuren nedan — en »regelrätt Coriolis roterande skiva». — tydligen så baserad på en MYCKET centrifugalt Coriolis relaterad STARK infästning (idealt vertikal Jordaxel relativt den horisontella ekliptikan) omkring 45° (±15°) — en märkbart flödesavlänkande brytpunkt för Solvärmens inverkan mellan norr och söder.
Vad vi vet — resultatuppgiften med ett (mv-calculations) vMIN = 0.2 M/S för hela det gascentrifugerande pol-ekvatorflödet — finns ingen direkt enkelt mätande expedition för en sådan låg genomsnittlig sommar-vinter vindhastighetsmätning med tillhörande resulterande BESTÄMD VÄSTLIG avlänkning. Passadvindarna, samma flödesform, skulle ligga närmast. Men dessa ligger i storleksordningen 2-10 M/S enligt en del uppgifter (Caribbean Tradewinds). Och dessutom endast i ett bälte upp till 30°.
Hela meningsformen skulle gå ut på att den aktuella Coriolispunkten (45°) är densamma som definierar vindmassan genom dess lägsta resp. högsta variabla p=mv ekvivalenter — genom en teoretiskt motsvarande nollsumma — TAGET MELLAN DE BÄGGE MOTVÄNDA FLÖDENA pol-ekvator, ekvator pol;
nollpunkten certifierar hela beräkningsunderlaget:
• Största maximala Coriolis effekt.
Utan en centrifugerande massfysik med ett konstant flödestryck p=mv kan den punkten, veterligt, inte härledas.
KORTARE:
— Hela vindsystemets matematiska fysik baseras på Coriolis effekter — som härleds från centrifugalkraftens massformaterande egenskaper — och allmänna gaslagens samband.
• Däremot anses Ferrelcellen i moderna korridorer vara av typen
”weak”, WikipediaInternetQuotes2022, ” The
Ferrel cell is weak, because ..”
— av modernt förklarliga skäl EFTERSOM man inte räknar med någon centrifugalkraft i något mest synligt framhävt sammanhang.
Sammanfattning:
Solvärmens funktion i vindkomplexet: Att enbart
värma och termiskt underhålla den gravitellt sammanhållna Jordlådan.
Inget annat. Vad som sker inuti lådan rör
inte Solvärmen.
SOLVÄRMEN ÅSTADKOMMER INGEN AVKYLNING.
MEN JORDROTATIONEN GÖR DET
— SÅ ATT VIND KAN GENERERAS — GENOM TEMPERATURSKILLNADER:
vMAX = (√ 3R/U)(√T1
– √T2)
och vars så härledda
grundfysikaliska matematik underhålls av Jordrotationen
Och
underligt är det (25Jul2022): DEN meningsformen verkar INTE — inte alls, inte
ens en antydan — ha etablerad representation inom de främsta led den borde ha
det. Eftersökt, inte ännu upphittat. Jämför Sveriges Energimyndighet (SEM):
’vindkraft kommer från Solen’ (inrättningen ger inga här kända referenser,
endast meddelar befolkningen »vad som gäller»).
Ett jämförande utdrag (ur en mera självkritisk beskrivning) finns i en del litteratur (kanske helt okänd inom Svensk Statsförvaltning) som förklarar den komplicerade situationen för den (milt sagt) förvirrade befolkningen:
” 1 Surface winds and vorticity mixing
Our goal in these lectures will
be to develop a qualitative understanding of
the general
circulation
of the atmosphere. As computer power increases, the
problem of the general circulation
is more and more often
tackled with complex numerical simulations. Yet attempts
at comprehensive simulations in isolation rarely produce satisfactory understanding. The
challenge for theorists in the
future will be to combine
idealized models and complex, more
realistic simulations in such a way as to produce a deeper
understanding of the atmospheric
circulation.”, THE
GENERAL CIRCULATION OF THE ATMOSPHERE
— Isaac M. Held and GFD/2000 Fellows
här tillagd färgmarkerad text framhäver här favoriserade nyckelmeningar:
• Väldigt mycket etablerat datorsimulerande, väldigt litet etablerat begripligt.
Lägg till det, de upplysande citaten från Persson1998 (Citat1, Citat2) angående det populära allmänna utflyktsmålet för studenter
— Coriolis effekten med dess matematiska fysik (Q1 ¦ MainARTICLE — ” Clutching the teacher’s hand ..”)
— och vi har säkert goda referenser till den allmänna inblicken i den etablerade korridorens allmänna trivsamhet.
KORTARE:
— INUTI moderna kvarter — typ Sveriges Energimyndighet (SEM): en sammanhängande uttömmande förklaring saknas.
— Uppenbarligen INTE på grund av »bristande intelligens». Absolut inte. Däremot på grund av ATT intresset för att använda det redan medfödda innehållet — allt mer — förefaller ATT vara en vara i svenskt kulturliv som i allt snabbare takt sätts på undantag:
• ”picka på knappen så blir du bättre”. ”Blippa”, ”Ladda ner Appen”.
The Rise of The Machines.
— OCH MEDAN DU ÄNDÅ ÄR PÅ VÄG UT KAN DU TA MED DIG SOPORNA OCKSÅ.
— ”Säg JA”.
— Aa ..
— ”DET MÅSTE VARA MED ETT J I BÖRJAN!”.
Inte ett dugg förnedrande att sätta en Maskin som språkrör Över en människa.
— PERSONALEN FÖRSTÅR INTE ENS SJÄLVA KONCEPTET.
— Berätta om MänniskoRätt. Säg något intelligent får vi höra. Något enda minsta lilla exempel.
SLUTA HA IHJÄL MÄNSKLIGHETEN.
KÄRNBYGGNADEN 1800+ I DEN MODERNA AKADEMINS LÄROSYSTEM
En sammanfattande uppsats om hur och på vilket sätt 1800+ den moderna akademin helt och hållet kom att missförstå, misstolkade, missuppfattade och fullständigt helt vantolkade den klassiska fysikens mest elementära grunder — tillståndsbegreppet (TP) — för att betjäna, upphöja och stadfästa »den nya tidens sätt att tänka och beskriva natur»: Einsteins allmänna och speciella relativitetsteori.
Bevisen, exemplen, jämförelserna med referenser och korsreferenser har tidigare sammanfattats och sammanställts i särskilda artiklar, här i sammanställda länkar (Carbo):
———————————————
vic-felet — den ytterst enkla och sammanfattande
härledningen till Einsteins speciella relativitetsteoris matematiska fysik och
hur och varför den utesluter Ljusfysikens
friställning från kinetiken [SOLRANDSOBSERVATIONERNA från 1919:
ljusbanor kring gravitella objekt uppvisar ingen centrifugalkraft]
DEN ELEKTRISKA LADDNINGENS HÄRLEDNING — som inte kunde härledas i moderna
kvarter på grund av de 1800+ primitivt antagna idéerna om fysik och matematik
INERTIA — särskilt sammanställda citat från
Albert Einstein — och direkta citat från Isaac Newton [PRINCIPIA 1687] — om vad
exakt den klassiska fysiken innehåller och vad den inte innehåller
PLANCKEKVIVALENTERNA — Experimentella Bekräftelser — förklarar
relativitetsteorins UTTOLKANDE matematiska fysik som en ytterst primitiv
uppfinning — ett direkt bevisbart förstånds- och fattningshandikapp i den
moderna akademins tankevärld: Planckekvivalenterna utklassar alldeles tydligt
helt och hållet relativitetsteorin [GPS-exemplet
särskilt]
LJUSFYSIKENS
GRAVITELLA BEROENDE
— sammanställd matematik Einstein-Schwarzchild-Relaterad fysik: grundorsaken
bakom det senare uppfunna moderna
akademiska begreppet ”MÖRK
ENERGI” [eng. dark energy] — GRAVITELL RÖDFÖRSKJUTNING i relaterad
fysik som på grund av ovanstående inte kunde härledas i moderna korridorer
ATOMKÄRNANS
HÄRLEDNING
— Neutronen — från Plancks konstant: någon ”atomkärnans härledning” känner man
inte alls till i moderna korridorer
NEUTRONKVADRATEN — dess uppdagande genom jämförelser med uppmätta
atomvikter, och hur resultatbilden [DiffGRAPHS]
fullkomligt söndersmular den moderna akademins tydligt och bevisbart — ytterst
— primitiva idé om atomkärnans natur
BLOTTA TERMEN, BEGREPPET, ”REFERENSSYSTEM” ÄR I MODERN AKADEMISK LÄROSTOL HELT VILSELEDANDE
DEN MODERNA AKADEMINS ALLMÄNNA VÅLDTÄKTSGALA PÅ
GALILEI-NEWTON FYSIKEN
— Av DRIFT. Självklart. Inte planerat eller organiserat. Inte med sådan avsikt.
” Enligt den klassiska fysiken är de fysikaliska lagarna för en roterande kropp skilda från dem som gäller för en kropp som inte roterar. Om tröghetslagen är giltig i det ena fallet, gäller den inte i det andra.”.
FYSIKENS UTVECKLING, Albert Einstein / Leopold Infeld 1938, s157 ¦
se Hela CITATET
Jämför korrekt relaterad beskrivande form:
Enligt DEN ALLMÄNNA UPPFATTNINGEN OM INNEBÖRDEN I den klassiska fysiken
” Vår slutsats måste bli att dessa lagar inte gäller i karusellens referenssystem. Detta skiljer sig från jordens referenssystem i ett viktigt avseende: det är ett accelererat system. Försök med andra accelererade system (referenssystem relativt en bromsande bil, en startande hiss etc.) visar att giltigheten av Galileis och Newtons lagar är begränsade till referenssystem som inte accelereras.”,
FYSIK III Mekanik, NKI-Biblioteksförlaget 1964 från sidan 42
Jämför korrekt relaterad beskrivande form:
visar att giltigheten ENLIGT DEN ALLMÄNNA UPPFATTNINGEN OM INNEBÖRDEN av Galileis och Newtons lagar är BEGRÄNSAD
” Tröghetskrafterna är skenbara krafter som uppträder i accelererade system. I ett stillastående system accelererar enligt kraftlagen en kropp som påverkas av en kraft (1 ovan). I ett system som följer med i rörelsen står kroppen stilla, men kraften finns kvar och måste upphävas av en (skenbar) motriktad kraft om kroppen skall anses vara i jämvikt (2). Vid rotationsrörelse upphävs den inåtriktade centripetalkraften av en utåtriktad tröghetskraft, centrifugalkraften, om kroppen anses stå stilla i ett system som följer med i rotationen (3).”
FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s72, Tröghetskrafter, illustrerat ¦ Se CITAT
Jämför korrekt relaterad beskrivande form:
I ett system som följer med i rörelsen står ENLIGT DEN ALLMÄNNA UPPFATTNINGEN OM INNEBÖRDEN AV GALILEIS OCH NEWTONS LAGAR kroppen stilla
Jämför korrekt relaterad beskrivande form:
Vid rotationsrörelse upphävs ENLIGT DEN ALLMÄNNA UPPFATTNINGEN OM INNEBÖRDEN AV GALILEIS OCH NEWTONS LAGAR den inåtriktade centripetalkraften av en utåtriktad tröghetskraft, centrifugalkraften, om kroppen anses stå stilla i ett system som följer med i rotationen
”ANSES”. Vi kan inte avhandla en sådan fysikbeskrivning i någon som helst bestämd mening.
Modern academic
teaching system cannot handle the description of physics.
• In a rest there is no acceleration.
• REST: no instrumental reaction.
• In an acceleration there is no rest.
• Laws of physics hold FOR systems. Not IN
systems.
• In physics no state of a rest exists — only specific moments of
equilibrium defining all action. Newton’s 3.
• The
are no ”inertial systems” in physics. Only different states of equilibrium
— by instrumental measure.
Undra sedan inte på att Meriterna i Undervisningen gynnar en allt mer degenererad tanke- och uppfattningsförmåga. Till slut förmår den bara underhålla en enda stimulerande idé om vad tillvaron ska gå ut på: lönsamhet: »Vi skiter i att inte alla kan vinna — det är inte våran sak».
Inte ett ord människorätt: Stat attackerar natur.
Newtons ämbarförsök (rad 1):
”There is only one real circular motion of any one revolving body”.
MAbakgrund: ModernAkademi
BAKGRUND, SAMMANHANG OCH UPPLÖSNING
Newton säger det rent, klart och tydligt:
———————————————————————————————————
”I likewise call attractions and
impulses, in the same sense, accelerative, and motive; and use the words
attraction, impulse or propensity of any sort towards a centre, promiscuously,
and indifferently, one for another; considering those forces not physically, but mathematically: wherefore, the reader is not to
imagine, that by those words, I
anywhere take upon me to define the kind, or the manner of any action, the
causes or the physical reason thereof, or that I attribute forces, in a true and physical sense, to certain
centres (which are only
mathematical points); when at any time I happen to speak of centres as
attracting, or as endued with attractive powers.”.
———————————————————————————————————
PRINCIPIA
Isaac Newton 1687 — Ur sektionen Definitions
i
översättning från latin av Andrew Motte 1729
Ensteins egna uppfinningar — misstolkningar av
fysikenens natur — som han lägger upphovet till i Newtons mun — i konkreta
citerande exempel, varsågoda:
”Newtons acceleration kan tänkas, resp. definieras endast som en acceleration i förhållande till hela rummet. Till rumsbegreppets geometriska realitet kom sålunda en ny, tröghetsbestämmande funktion hos rummet.”
MIN
VÄRLDSBILD Sidan 182 Albert Einstein BONNIERS 1934
Den ”tröghetsbestämmande” detalj som Einstein rör vid ÄR uppenbarligen hela fysikens grundval: motstånd mot omedelbar tillståndsförändring. Det är, vad vi vet, INTE ett rumsbegrepp. Det är den naturliga egenskapen hos all materia att inte genomgå ändringar omgående, och vars upphov vi inte kan härleda EFTERSOM vi heller inte kan härleda något upphov till energins existens, energilagen (Se EnergyLAW).
— Det är tydligt att Einstein ville var tvungen att göra Det till ett FÖREMÅL — som en idé med upphov i Newtons sätt att tänka — då det däremot, relaterbart in till sista atom, är en ren naturbeskrivning som INTE Einstein kunde acceptera för att alls kunna formulera Den allmänna relativitetsprincipen (EARP ¦ EARPref : fysikens kinematisering: i grunden finns inga krafter alls i fysiken [PerssonQuote1998 ¦ Wikipedia, Fictitious force]).
”rumsbegreppets geometriska realitet” är dessutom, vad vi vet, ett rent (populärt) hjärnspöke (uppkommet 1800+): Rummet — rymden — har varken geometriska eller fysiska egenskaper: De fysiska egenskaperna representeras som ett konkret begrepp uteslutande av fysikens kroppar, deras atominnehåll, och deras inneboende ordningar. Inget annat. Allt annat är/blir en ren spekulation utan något som helst naturvetenskapligt påvisbart sakinnehåll.
Einsteins enträgna försök att
låta Newton agera skyltdocka för uppfinningen av Intertialsystem
DEN ABSOLUTA
VILANS BEGREPP (Newtons absoluta rum)
[Citat:7]
Albert Einstein
”Ehuru man flerstädes märker Newtons strävan att
framställa sitt system såsom med nödvändighet betingat av erfarenheten och att
införa så få med erfarenheten icke direkt förknippade begrepp som möjligt,
uppställde han likväl begreppen absolut
rum och absolut tid.
Man har i vår tid ofta förebrått honom detta. Men just på
denna punkt är Newton särskilt konsekvent. Han hade insett, att de iakttagbara geometriska
storheterna (de materiella punkternas inbördes avstånd) och deras förändringar
med tiden icke fullständigt karakterisera rörelserna i fysikaliskt hänseende.
Bevis härför utgjorde det berömda ämbarförsöket.
Det finnes således
utom massorna och deras av tiden beroende avstånd ännu något, som är för
skeendet nödvändigt; detta något uppfattar han som relationen till det absoluta rummet.
EN: MAbakgrund
Han inser, att rummet måste äga ett slags fysikalisk realitet,
om hans rörelselagar hava någon mening, en realitet av samma slag som de
materiella punkterna och deras avstånd.
Denna klara
insikt vittnar om Newtons vishet, men på samma gång om en svag punkt i hans
teori. Ty dennas logiska resning skulle säkerligen vara mera tillfredsställande
utan detta skuggbegrepp; då skulle i lagarna endast uppträda storheter
(masspunkter, avstånd), vilkas samband med det förnimbara stå fullkomligt
klara.”.
MIN
VÄRLDSBILD Albert Einstein s157 · Bonniers 1934
Det är så nära snudd på rent bedrägeri (taskspeleri — av DRIFT, inte på avsikt) man kan komma: ”Newton insåg” något som — bevisligt — enbart fanns i DEN AV MODERN AKADEMI MÄRKBART UPPHÖJDA Einsteins egen föreställande tanke OM Newton — ett fysiskt objektivt föremål för fysikens tillståndsbegrepp, den s.k. absoluta rörelsen, Newtons berömda ämbarförsök. Einstein har inget citerande utdrag som styrker hans påstående, enbart egna formulerade tolkningsföreträden utan minsta citerande referens, vad vi vet.
”Uppfattar han” — psykläkaren (Lisbeth Salander-filmerna 2008+) som anser sig beskriva en patients sinnesförvirrade tillstånd inför domstol i mening av att föredra en sakvetenskaplig expertis: inga citat ges.
CITATEN NEDAN FRÅN
FYSIKEN OCH MÄNNISKAN Tor Ragnar Gerholm
som berättade om Newtons berömda ämbarförsök (Citat15) och den allmänna skadeglädjen i försöken — och den moderna idoga strävan — att ha ihjäl den klassiska fysiken.
Gerholms (utomordentliga) beskrivning ger vad vi har förstått en (mycket) god bild av bakgrunden till hela ”spektaklet” med angreppen (1800+) på Newton och behovet av att utpeka honom som upphovet till de — i grunden som det har visat sig — egna missuppfattade fysikbegreppen:
TheMock: EN ¦ MAbakgrund ¦ ModernAkademi
DEN MODERNA AKADEMINS HJÄRTLIGT UPPHÖJDA
OPROKLAMERADE BEHÅNANDE AV DET EGNA FÖRSTÅNDETS FATTNINGSGRUNDER:
tillståndsbegreppet (TP)
• FYSIKEN INNEHÅLLER INGA TILLSTÅND men tillståndsbegreppet är oundgängligt för fysikens beskrivning: (Se även i Sanningens Bortgång):
Centrifugal — radial — acceleration [å] in
explicit:
———————————————————————————————————
”Man kan fråga sig vad det beror på att Newton som med all rätt betraktas som ett av mänsklighetens största genier kunde vara så besatt av mekanikens problem. Lagarna för pendelns svängningar, för det fria fallet och för planeternas rörelser må vara intressanta, men i alla fall, kunde inte en så sällsynt utrustad hjärna ha funnit värdigare och mera anspråksfulla problemställningar? [Varför preciserar sig inte Gerholm beträffande något alternativ?].
Men så uppfattade inte Newton saken. För honom var studiet av mekaniken det största och angelägnaste av alla människoandens företag. Varför?
Därför att genom mekaniken ansåg Newton att vi kunde vinna absolut visshet om det absoluta rummets existens. Och detta absoluta rum har förvisso märkliga egenskaper. Det är evigt och oändligt stort, långt bortom all mänsklig fantasis föreställningsförmåga. Det kan varken skapas eller förstöras och är allestädes närvarande. Det är logiskt överordnat sitt innehåll, ty vi kan ju tänka oss ett absolut tomt rum utan någon materia men inte gärna tvärtom. Vi kan inte tänka oss materia utan att ha något rum att placera det i. På detta sätt blir tomrummet, grekernas "icke-vara", en förutsättning för "varats" — materiens — existens. Det absoluta rummet blir det suprima varat.
Filosofen Henry Moore företog 1671 en analys av det absoluta rummets olika attribut och sammanfattar dem på följande sätt. Det absoluta rummet är: ett, enkelt, orörligt, evigt, komplett, oberoende, existerande av sig självt, existerande genom sig självt, opåverkbart, nödvändigt, omätligt, oskapat, obegränsat, ofattbart, allestädes närvarande, okroppsligt, allt genomträngande, och allt omfattande, existerande i varat, existerande i skeendet, ger rent skeende (dvs. utan orsak).
Det verkligt intressanta med denna förteckning är nu att den alldeles exakt överensstämmer med de skolastiska filosofernas definition av begreppet Gud!”,
FYSIKEN
OCH MÄNNISKAN Tor Ragnar Gerholm, ALDUS 1966, s81
———————————————————————————————————
JÄMFÖR återigen (EN) Einsteins ovan citerade »Uppfunna Newton»:
”Han inser, att rummet måste äga ett slags fysikalisk realitet, om hans rörelselagar hava någon mening, en realitet av samma slag som de materiella punkterna och deras avstånd”.
Det kan med den preferensen och övriga liknande citerade inte råda något som helst tvivel om varifrån begreppet om ett INERTIALSYSTEM i fysiken kom.
Utvecklingen 1800+ framtvingadce »ett nytt natursynsätt» — som utan sans och vett och förstånd började våldta grundernas fundament: staten attackerar naturen.
TP: TheMock ¦ MAbakgrund ¦ ModernAkademi
EQUILIBRIUM — BALANCE — INSTRUMENTAL READOUTS — 100% INDEPENDENT OF VIEW (TheBASIC ¦ TheMAL)
Jämför den relaterbara fysikens grundval —
tillståndets princip:
————————————————————————————————————————————
ALL FÖRESTÄLLNING utgår från den absoluta vilans princip, den absoluta visshetens princip, SANNINGSPRINCIPEN, den absoluta
likformighetens princip, eller allmänt tillståndets princip. Det är liktydigt med
det oförstörbara intervallets eller den oförstörbara enhetens princip (WhyMAC).
Grunden till ovanstående påstående ges i sanningspostulatet, vilket här förutsättes bekant.
All beskrivning utgår (således) ifrån en föreställning om tillstånd (eller visshet). Men …
Fysiken innehåller
inga tillstånd (absolut positionsbestämning
under nolltid). Men den beskrivs och fattas tvunget genom sådana (avstånden
mellan kropparna oberoende av tiden: nuet, dt 
0). Därav principerna.
Vi
skiljer alltså skarpt mellan förståndsvärld (differentialer, dt 0) och fenomenvärld (differenser Δt → 0).
Se utförlig beskrivning från NOLLFORMSALGEBRAN
Fysiken identifierar vi med kropparna eller massorna: massa
(m), laddning (Q) och rörelse (spinn).
De
klassiska grundbegreppen är massa, kraft och gravitation.
Genom massan m som
m=ma/a=F/a definieras kraftlagen
F=ma med a=v/t.
Gravitationslagen definieras genom centrifugalkraften
F=ma=mw2/r på ringens form motsvarande tyngden
(vägande) eller trögheten (förflyttande) enligt
F=ma=(w2/rm2)·m2m=(w2/m2)·m2m/r=(w2r/m2)·m2m/r2=G·m2m/r2.
NEWTON som tydligen väl fattade kvintessensen i ämnet, men saknade det för hans tid nödvändiga vokabuläret — matematiken — för att hitta det beskrivande sakinnehållet — BEHÅNAS ÖPPET oproklamerat och dåraktigt I MODERN AKADEMI föregående citat:
” Han inser, att rummet måste äga ett slags fysikalisk realitet, om ..”, EN
IGEN:
Newton säger det själv rent ut, klart och tydligt:
———————————————————————————————————
”I likewise call attractions and impulses,
in the same sense, accelerative, and motive; and use the words attraction,
impulse or propensity of any sort towards a centre, promiscuously, and
indifferently, one for another; considering those forces not physically, but mathematically: wherefore, the reader is not to
imagine, that by those words, I
anywhere take upon me to define the kind, or the manner of any action, the
causes or the physical reason thereof, or that I attribute forces, in a true and physical sense, to certain
centres (which are only
mathematical points); when at any time I happen to speak of centres as
attracting, or as endued with attractive powers.”.
———————————————————————————————————
PRINCIPIA
Isaac Newton 1687 — Ur sektionen Definitions
i
översättning från latin av Andrew Motte 1729
Ibland är det svårt att förstå hur tänkande människor kan formulera sådana — närmast horribelt osakliga och vilseledande, rent bedrägliga — sentenser som de OM NEWTON som givits exempel på i ovanstående utdrag.
OM det, trots allt, skulle vara så att det här författarämnet har missat något stort och avgörande, vore det kul att — äntligen — få se något upplysande argument i den avhandlingen.
Se även i ZENONS TEOREM.
SocialPART2: 15Jun2022
— SocialPART1
All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights
A1 UDHR10Dec1948 — EQUAL IN DIGNITY: — equal
”.. and all of you are children of the most High”. King James Bible Ps.82:6.
Any other claim becomes a manifestation of Satanism: fascism. By DRIFT. Not by plan;
SEE ANY RESEMBLANCE?
Israel thus stands between God and humanity, representing each to the other.
MICROSOFT ENCARTA 99 ENCYCLOPEDIA, Judaism — Basic Doctrines and Sources
— Return Palestine — NOW. 24/7. ISRAEL and JUDAH have nothing to do with geography, flesh or body.
So and the rest will take care of itself :
Unless UN is about to enter A
Well Related Proclaimed Fascism:
it IS related as THE HUMAN NATURE — apparently raped by old United Nations (from Balfour Declaration 1917) — allowing preparing Physical Land to a SECT for Taking its Property — Only Special Humans. UN. 1917+.
The true way — ignored by UN:
• No land. No body. No flesh. No claim OTHER then ”.. and all of you are children of the most High”.
Come again.
UN created — made way for — the present world violence chaos — as it may possibly be understood and interpreted. Why? Apparently because of a bad conscience in having persecuted the Satanistic Sect during a rough 2000 years — now 1917+ compensating the debt in being kind enough to Sweep Crap Under Carpet. The effect was devastating.
THIS IS THE ONE AN ONLY
UNIVERSAL HumanRight FOUNDED
SOCIAL MEDIA
A19 UDHR10Dec1948:
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression;
this right includes freedom to hold
opinions without interference
and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas
through any media and regardless of
frontiers.
• WE DON’T HAVE TO LOG IN TO TAKE PART IN A HUMAN RIGHT BASED CITY WITH SHOPS AND PARKS AN CAFÉS IN
TO MEET, PRACTICE GENERAL COMMON SOCIAL CIVILIZED INTERCOURSE, SHARE IDEAS, THOUGHTS AND OUR PRIVATE DRAWINGS AND PHOTOS AND FANTASIES AND THEIR PETS WITH THOSE WHO WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE MORE FRIENDLY AND DEEP SIDES INSIDE THE HUMAN NATURE, OR OTHER HUMAN ISSUES:
• WE DON’T HAVE TO ACCEPT ANY KIND OF ”ACTION REGISTRATION”, SURVEILLANCE OR SUPERVISION OF ANY KIND OR SORT OR TYPE OF NATURE. THAT TYPE OF VISION BELONGS TO IMPRISONMENT. AND IT STAYS THERE:
• WE DON’T HAVE TO ACCEPT AND STAND TO BE TAGGED AND TREATED LIKE CATTLE ON A MARKET, CATEGORIZED BY A SUPERVISING EMPIRE BASED ON ELECTRONIC MIRRORING ON WHAT WE DID IN THE PAST, PROMPTING US TO CONFORM, ACCEPT, AND ACT AS IF THAT INSTANCE JUST PRESENTED HEAVEN TO US:
• OUR THINKING IS FREE — not negotiable. No way. THOUGHTS may be whatever they may be. But free they are. And that is our only way of presenting arguments — science — based on our HumanRight: our human civilization;
A4 UDHR10Dec1948:
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave
trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.
UN: STOP KILLING HUMANITY:
Is there another definition of FREEDOM on the one hand
”.. and all of you are children of the most High”. King James Bible Ps.82:6;
and slavery on the other hand
Sw. BKL X 1927.sp983
”a state of personal not-freedom,
”ett tillstånd av personlig ofrihet”
KNOWN TODAY 2022 IN THE WORLD than those suggested from the history of United Nations 1917+?
» .. and ONLY SOME of you are children of the most High», UNITED NATIONS 1917+ :
— ”The rest will obey and do as told. ELSE : no access” — in specific (2010¦18+):
World Business Enterprise Microsoft&Google 4Nov2020. No access unless consenting NOT to mention HumanRight
AS THE FOREMOST MOST IMPORTANT 24/7 MESSAGE FOR INTERRUPTING ON INDIVIDUAL ENGAGEMENTS,
Now, therefore,
The General Assembly,
Proclaims this
Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for
all peoples and all nations, to
the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this
Declaration constantly in mind,
shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by
progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and
observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among
the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
P8 UDHR10Dec1948
:
World Business Enterprise Microsoft&Google 4Nov2020. No access unless consenting NOT to mention HumanRight
AS THE FOREMOST MOST IMPORTANT 24/7 MESSAGE FOR INTERRUPTING ON INDIVIDUAL ENGAGEMENTS,
There isn’t much of a sense in the present version
of the UN than: business:
— Zero HumanRight care.
Treating Humanity BY MIND as Tagged Cattle — on a Market — protected by jurisdiction and police. Have your say.
HUMAN RIGHT ORIGIN: 17Jun2022 ¦ Properties ¦ General
State Law
ON THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN RIGHT PROPERTY
A POSSIBLE SCENARIO — we haven’t seen Your version, yet .. — ON THE ORIGIN OF HUMAN RIGHT property
200 000 YearsAgo:
VoJ:
Complete Time Line K-cell Expansion —
with Basic Earth Geological History — according to Related TNED
Physics in UniverseHistory [2008+ @Internet]
SHORT POSSIBLE SCENARIO from some earliest 200 000 years ago:
:
• The Human Skull is perfected, the skeleton has full present human form;
(Rough
picture from JOHN A. J. GOWLETT, Ascent to Civilization, Sw. CIVILIZATIONENS
GRYNING, Norstedts 1984; an extensive illustrated work on excavations and data
for collecting a general picture of the geological history of humanity).
• The Human
realizes there is a COVENANT between Human and LIFE:
(Rough picture from The Old Testament — and the sayings from the Jesus man — and general Buddha teaching .. and some Veda).
• The Human IS A GUEST — NOT A MASTER — IN LIFE.
• Food — fruit, (boiled) vegetables — and Friendship is (very) GOOD. Very.
Friendship definitely
crashes when we cannot handle respect for The Woman’s Right to be a Woman.
That is: all human culture’s worst nightmare.
• HUMANS DID NOT MAKE THE UNIVERSE. Be careful : wisdom, knowledge, resolution, friendship, right — other basics were already known: temper, wrath, courage, defense (animal right, see Properties) — and the following firmness and questioning certifying insight and wisdom : true respect and especially a deep adoration and admiration for The Woman:
Sw. Bibeln 1917 HÖGA VISAN ¦ Eng.
Song of Solomon
2:7 ¦ 3:5 ¦ 8:4 ;
1. ”Jag besvär eder I Jerusalems döttrar, vid gaseller och hindar på marken:
Oroen icke kärleken, stören den icke, förrän den själv så vill.”:
7:2 ;
2. ”Ditt sköte är en rundad skål, må vinet aldrig fattas däri.”;
Directly here to English:
1. ”I bother you, You daughters of Jerusalem, by gazelles and hinds on ground:
Trouble not love, disturb it not, until itself so wants.”:
KING JAMES BIBLE (Song of Solomon) puts it this
way, same chapter and verse:
1. ”I charge you, O ye daughters of Jerusalem, by the roes, and by the hinds of the field, that ye stir not up, nor awake my love, till he please.”;
2. ”Your nearest inside of the pussy is a rounded cupule[bowl], may the wine in there never be missing.”;
(English seems limited here in its vocabulary on Woman’s properties, especially when [very] highly aroused [around the actual most near inside] ..; no found corresponding one word except womb — the part lying considerably longer inside at the top of »The LoveTunnel» where WE actually develop .. [more in private, so to speak]: the description may depend on experience .. or if Womb maybe was the one aimed at ..).
KING JAMES BIBLE (Song of Solomon) puts it this
way, same chapter and verse:
2. ”Thy navel is like a round goblet, which wanteth no liquor”;
[NAVEL »wants no Juice» apparently must mean (at least) the first pussy part: the absolute most shockingly astounding amazing construct in our universe, of its kind].
Our Mother: all humans have the same inner memory and association properties: mind. There is no one lower or higher than anybody else.
A first possible Script ought to entail a description of the basic PROPERTIES — as inherited from the first moments of realization (.. Sarah, Abraham, Jacob .. ISRAEL ..).
DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN CIVILIZATIONS — as spreading over larger areas — favors a decomposition of »The Central Teaching»: Aspects of PROPERTY offer temptations leading to a killed friendship; A general degeneration of the original virtues and values arise, sooner or later — unless the original findings have some kind of a (strong centralized) CITY (or region) where life is strongly centered on the virtues: hard to forget. In time, with larger populated areas, the influence of The City naturally diminishes (ICE ages). Barbarian attitudes arise (harmless humans are persecuted and sent to prison) where no knowledge exists of the origin. And no force exists to stop that type of evolution in time.
IF a SECT arises, claiming specific corporeal property of or identity with the original virtues (a definite abomination crushing humanity as a whole), that claim, if successful (in a time and region with deep oppositions and strong claims), marks a definite end of the (first found) properties in humanity as realized to be one single family (’Cos I don’t really give a shit”).
Then INEVITABLY a period of a final desolation arises: everything will be broken down to the last atom. And nothing can stop it — except a final full revelation of knowledge. All of it.
See also in VECTOR MATH.
BioSURFtext: BioSURFACE
WHAT REPLACES THE REDUCTION?
AT LEAST 8: Leaf&Needle unfolded EARTH LIFE us
BUILDING AGENTS — during 3Gy:
— >30% REMOVES DURING 200y
PERIOD 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012). ONE THIRD. TWO HUNDRED YEARS. EARTH LIFE ON 70%:
— V8on5?
TextPART
PREFERENCE: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 — last known 100%
preserved natural forests
SPRUCE TREE EQUIVALENT — ADOPTED GLOBAL average TREE EQUIVALENT
for all ground based biomass — T ¦ t =
10^± —
y YEAR
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
200y ................ age
— when entering decay/oxygen consumption from growth/cyclic oxygen filtering ¦
Wilander2012: 400y ParkTreeSTUDY
1 500 KG .......... alive mass/GE
300 KG ............. corresponding productive alive mass of Leaf&Needle/GE: 20%
7.5 KG/y ....... corresponding
productive alive CYCLIC/ effective replenishing of new Leaf&Needle/GE: 0.5%
20M² ............... adopted
average forest ground growth/decay supplying area/GE ¦ SKOGSSVERIGE 2014
[http://skogssverige.se/node/34784]
5.9 T13 M² ........ ”pre-idustrial”
total 100% preserved forest growth ground area — MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2
¦ ForestWORLD2012
2.95 T12 GE ...... N =
NUMBER OF NATURE FOREST’S GLOBAL TREE EQUIVALENTS — last
seen MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2
1 000 KG/M³ ..... rounded
average density/aliveGE — recently taken down floats on or near top of water
540 KG/M³ ........ dry
GE density — weighed/tested on indoor [15-20°C] long time [decade] storage
750 KG ............ dry mass — based on average 50% water loss
375 KG ............ dry
carbon mass — based on molecular weight carbon [C6¦72] to glucose — C6 5H2O ¦90 minus 1H2O = 72
————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
15mM ............. 0.015
M, average Needle length — sample test from an estimated average Swedish Spruce
Tree — GRANENS BIOYTA
3.25 mM .......... 0.00325
M, measured average estimated cylindric Needle circumference
4.875 t5 M² ....... measured/estimated average total Sun energy up-taking/receptive
1 Global Needle&Leaf biosurface
5.23 t6 KG ........ average
one single Needle ONE WEEK DRIED mass — weighed on comparing branch Needle
group masses
10.46 t6 KG ....... average
one single Needle ALIVE mass — dry mass times averaged 2 as above
Q ..................... 300
KG / 10.46 t6 KG = 28 680 688.34, average number of alive
Leaf&Needle equivalents per Global tree Equivalent
Q4.875 t5 M² ..... AQ,
total Sun energy up-taking/receptive Global Needle&Leaf biosurface area per 1 Global Tree Equivalent:
AQ = 1398.183556 M² ~ 1400 M²/GE
NAQ ................ 2.95
T12 × 1400M² = 4.13 T15 M² total biomass Sun
energy up-taking ground mass based Leaf&Needle light energy area
nEA ................. NAQ/EA
= 4.13 T15 M² / 5.11 T14 M² = 8.82191781 number
of flat Earth equatorial sphere areas
8—13 ............... some margins suggest — alternative
fraction/metric references — that nEA could be up to 13 [JOLIS].
———————————————
Wilander2012 ¦ GE ¦ 20M²/GE ¦ 1500 KG ¦ 15mM ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ ForestWORLD2012
SummingUP: BioSURF ¦ O16FILTER ¦
CAN ANYONE DISCLAIM? Also
summarized in SUM in The
Mass of The Earth (Dec2021)
SUMMING UP ALL THE IMPRESSIONS (2010+).
The imperative urge of
clarifying the situation — Jan2022
AS MUCH AS HUMANITY WANTS TO CLARIFY
THIS SPECIFIC 2020+ HORRIBLE WORLD SITUATION (12May2022):
— Facts Or Fantasy? Step
forward and clarify anyone who can.
DOLE1965 ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ Simard2012 ¦ ForestWORLD2012 ¦ Quinney2020 ¦ Marker ¦ VIRUS ¦
DOLE1965 ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ Simard2012 ¦ ForestWORLD2012 ¦ Quinney2020 ¦ Marker ¦ VIRUS ¦
DOLE1965 ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ Simard2012 ¦ ForestWORLD2012 ¦ Quinney2020 ¦ Marker ¦ VIRUS ¦
— EXPLAIN. TEST THIS:
Life
evolution, development and support apparently (3Gy to Humans) builds on 100% preserved
no state cut biomass-surface-life sunlight up taking power. Severely reduced,
life chemistry begins fragmenting — as rust on an original mirror steel plate —
»virus mutations» — nature says, here to be tested.
—
To some extent, to a certain limit, chemical compositions MIGHT dampen the
effects (as a provisional paint over the cracks). The loss of basic
evolutionary sustaining power consumes that too, in time. In the long run, the
engine stalls — unless allowed to recover. A V8-on-5 will die out.
DOLE1965 ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ Simard2012 ¦ ForestWORLD2012 ¦ Quinney2020 ¦ Marker ¦ VIRUS ¦
causing agent — 1800+ : severe human made life power
reduction on Planet Earth in Solar System in Milky Way in Universe
— A V8 on 5?
Don’t even think about it.
EITHER THIS PRESENTATION HAS SERIOUS FLAWS not yet revealed here CREATING AN UNNECESSARY DEPRESSIVE PICTURE OF THE SITUATION. OR — WORST CASE SCENARIO if the world states does not awake to take action and break the ice:
• embrace. We get credit for trying.
LEAF&NEEDLE SUNLIGHT ENERGY SUSTAINING LIFE POWER ON EARTH
BIOSURFACE
LEAF&NEEDLE SUNLIGHT ENERGY SUSTAINING LIFE POWER ON EARTH
As deduced (from the AGW-complex 2015+ ¦ Comparing IPCC-examples ¦ TabellY3)
ONE SINGLE TREE EQUIVALENT
REPRESENTING ALL GROUND BASED BIOMASS — ALL SPECIES, GLOBAL ANNUAL AVERAGE ¦ BioGAS ¦ $
GLOBAL TREE
EQUIVALENT ¦ GE — GranEkvivalenten
SpruceEq. database collected — WILANDER2012
¦ GE — inledning intro
¦ GE-basen ¦ 20M² ¦
MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ ForestWORLD2012 ¦ SpruceTree BioSURFACE — a Swedish sample test: GRANENS
BIOYTA ¦ Accounted Reckoning ¦ JOLIS
AT LEAST 8 FLAT EARTH SURFACE
AREAS LEAF&NEEDLE UNFOLDED: last 1812
How we calculate and reckon
the total unfolded Leaf&Needle insolation life energy catching area
— on knowing the original
100% nature forest ground growth area ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ ForestWORLD2012
See separateTextPart;
———————————————
Wilander2012 ¦ GE ¦ 20M²/GE ¦ 1500 KG ¦ 15mM ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ ForestWORLD2012
ONLY HERE KNOWN EXPLANATION:
WORLD STATES AND NATIONS HAVE NO AWARENESS OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE
ENTERPRISE:
WHAT REPLACES THE REDUCTION 8–5?
Minst 8 släta Jordytor. I orörd naturskog. Senast
existerande — 1812. Blad&Barr → aminosyra,
protein: DNA. 3Gy. Människan+. Allt liv. 200y:–30%?
— Varför består statsförvaltningen
bevisligen av människor med noll naturrespekt — ”virus” — hallå? Mer än 30% borttaget
på 200y, 1800-2000.
— Starkt allvarligt
alarmerande försvagad reducerad Jordbiologisk biokemiskt underhållande
livskraft. Starkt. Avgörande menligt. Hälsofarligt. Dödligt.
AT LEAST 8: Leaf&Needle unfolded EARTH LIFE us
BUILDING AGENTS during 3Gy:
— >30% REMOVES DURING 200y
PERIOD 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012). ONE THIRD. TWO HUNDRED YEARS. EARTH LIFE ON 70% — V8on5?
Preference for last known
documented 100% preserved Leaf&Needle LIFE ENERGY sustaining Agency: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2
LAND BASED BIOMASS
LEAF&NEEDLE BIOSURFACE IS THE MAIN SOLAR ENERGY PLANT GROWTH OXYGEN
FILTERING AGENT
CAL[CULUS]CARD OpenOffice — with the given figures — Compiled
9Jan2022 — minimum 8 flat Earth
surface areas — on 100% preserved nature
forests: last seen: 1812:
With
the average Global adopted spruce
tree representing all biological life and its needle Equivalent L=20mM pM=4mM adds 5.5 more: 13.2 in total. 8 low. 13 high.
Latest 1812.
Tests on other Spruce
individual shows some significant differences in needle metrics — a margin
example underlines the end effect:
AS IS SEEN: MARGINALLY
MODIFYING THE LENGTH AND CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE AVERAGE NEEDLE — SAME PRESERVED
MASS — REFLECTS DIRECTLY ON SEVERAL ADDITIONAL FLAT EARTH BIOSURFACE
EQUIVALENTS. WITH LENGTH 20mM AND CIRCUMFERENCE (PERIMETER pM) 4mM, THE NUMBER
OF TOTAL FLAT EARTH AREAS REACH OVER 13 — last seen 1812.
STATE
attacks its own internationally asseverated societal contract ” .. of the greatest importance .. ” — Marker :
what 30% can you spare? Do share greatest.
PERFECT ASSEMBLY. No flaws. No errors. What
built life: sun energy transfer agents. Perfect beauty .. until ..
1800: full representation. EARTH LIFE us BUILDING AGENTS during 3Gy.
2000: >30% removed by human hand enterprise: ............... ↑ Understand Concept?
— 100% intelligence — 0%
nature insight. Say it: YOU ARE WRONG: A V8 engine — on 5. Won’t work. LIFE
POWER SUN ENERGY BIOLOGIC SURFACE:
— DO YOU UNDERSTAND THE
FUNCTION OF LEAF&NEEDLE — TO BRING THE HUMAN BODY HERE, IN UNIVERSE, THE
ONLY AGENT?
— Production of amino acid,
protein: DNA structure — based on 8 — not 5 — flat Earth Surface unfolded
Leaf&Needle area in 3Gy 100% chlorophyll nature:
THE LIFE
PROVIDER AGENCY. Say. 8
.Not5. Come again.
— Math Class elementary
Educated Population — where — .. hello .. anybody home?
PERIOD — ForestWORLD2012 — 1800-2000 MORE THAN 30% OF THE ORIGINAL NATURE FREE DESIGNED
FOREST LEAF&NEEDLE SUSTAINING GROUND BASED FOREST AREA WAS REMOVED — BY
HUMAN HAND. AND 2000+ STILL GROWING IN REDUCTION.
SOCIETY 2022 DEFINITELY HAS LOST ITS MANIFEST
CoriolisTwoTheorems: — A
31Jul2022 Compilation from previous ¦
TheMAL
¦ EARTHWind
FUNDAMENTALS ¦ Coriolis1 ¦ Coriolis2
THE CORIOLIS EFFECT is — here, and mostly elsewhere too as it appears — entirely dedicated the (1831-32) Gaspard Coriolis First Theorem’s apparent
KINETIC-ENERGY EXPRESSION — no kinematics whatsoever (see CoriolisCINEMA) — leading directly to TheBASIC as related below.
PREFIXxSIN ¦
Persson1998p1378
¦ Θ Greek Theta
The FOUCAULT PENDULUM PHENOMENA has no connection to The Coriolis FORCE — kinetics — as the Foucault Pendulum phenomena is in every provable detail and part a strict trigonometric rotational projective phenomena, completely out of connection to kinetics: a pendulums projection on an underlying rotating disc and its projective frames (compare the levels of comprehension on the elementary principles of physics: Newtons Famous Vessel Experiment).
Here we cite Persson1998 in his clarifying presentation of Gaspard Coriolis’ two theorems (1835)
• with additional
detailed related CLASSICAL PHYSICS descriptions
• based on Related Mathematics (down to the basics),
• securing and guaranteeing that nobody will be left behind.
— Because of cryptic modern vector algebra, which will be related here — or other diffusing and disturbing parts — most pedestrians have left the mother ship a long time ago. Here we will try to gather those already poor dead, attempting to awake them into a new and bright eternal life. And so along with additional practical examples.
Related physics and
mathematics explains
Coriolis’ 2 Theorems
” FIG. 6. Coriolis’s first theorem: a body, m, on a rotating turntable moving with a speed, v0, is subject to a force, P, and displaced along a trajectory, ds, and accelerates to v1. ”,
Persson1998 p1378 column1 top
BUT IT SHOULD BE EMPHASIZED SO, as here related:
a body, m,
MARKEDLY FRICTIONALLY more or less whatever CONNECTED TO
AND
on a rotating turntable
moving with a speed, v0, is
SO BECOMES
subject to a force, P,
and displaced
along a trajectory, ds, and accelerates to v1.
THIS CORRESPONDS TO THE UH2012 DESCRIBED TRAM RESEMBLANCE (The
5 Coriolis Clauses), further
below in Gaspard Coriolis’ own mathematics, WITH AN INWARD MOUNTED
INSTRUMENTATION, SENSING THE CORIOLIS ACCELERATION AS WE SENSE AND CAN MEASURE:
As FROM WITHIN BY A BALL HANGING FROM A TREAD IN THE ROOF with ANY KIND OR SORT OF CHANGE FROM ANY KIND OR SORT OF A
GIVEN ESTABLISHED EQUILIBRIUM IN ANY KIND OR TYPE OF MOMENT by ANY THE SMALLEST ACCELERATION — AS IN AN ACCELERATING
CAR OR ANY OTHER change of a VEHICLE move (Newton’s 3).
— This first Coriolis Theorem is — hence — a large
generalization for practically ALL Kinetic (where a measurable force is
involved) cases where a Coriolis effect is physically — by friction —
measurable. And Persson1998 (And Coriolis himself) also clarifies this explicit
KINETIC property in a separate text part (below) to be the ONLY interest in the
complex,
(“On the principle of kinetic energy in the relative
motion in machines”), Persson1998 page 1378 column 1, with further:
” Coriolis’s papers do not deal with the atmosphere or even the rotation of the earth, but with the transfer of energy in rotating systems like waterwheels. The 1832 paper established that
the relation between potential and kinetic energy for a body, m, moving with a velocity, v0,
affected by a force, P, which makes it accelerate to a velocity, v0, is the same in a rotating
system as in a nonrotational (Fig. 6):
mv12/2 – mv02/2
= 
P cos Θ ds, (3)
where Θ is the angle between P and ds.”,
Persson1998 p1378 column1 bottom ¦ Θ, Greek Theta
As expressed In PREFIXxSIN: See in explicit
related mathematics on the concepts of integral, differentials and differences
in the Zero
Form Algebra, unless already
familiar (TheMAL):
mv12/2 – mv02/2 = P sinΘ ds
We will soon dismantle this expression more thoroughly in
deep with respect to the simple mentioned TRAM RESEMBLANCE (tram traveling on a
radial rail on a spinning disc), after this following continued text in FIG.6
from Persson1998:
” The change in kinetic energy, corresponding to the change of potential energy, is due to the work done by the driving force P along the projection of the distance ds where Θ is the angle between P and ds.”.
Persson1998 p1378 column1 top, FIG.6
AND THAT PART COULD BE EMPHASIZED SO, as here related:
The change in
kinetic energy
THAT IS THE ENERGY WITH
WHICH THE KINETIC (action with Force)
MOTIONAL EFFECT IS SENSED AND MEASURED
— The Coriolis acceleration and its force —
IS TAKEN
EITHER FROM A SEPARATE m-BODY
motional MACHINE SUPPORTED ENERGY SOURCE APART FROM THE ENERGY SOURCE ON WHICH
THE m-BODY IS MOVING
or
AS CONSUMED on frictional credit INERTIAL KINETIC
ENERGY FROM THE ROTATING TURNTABLE'S MACHINERY:
— In either way, the Coriolis FORCE TAKES KINETIC INERTIA
by the frictional connection its motional agent (the m-body) has ON the rotating turntable:
— In the case of Earth's wind system, the Coriolis
acceleration takes this Rotational Velocity Friction Kinetically Related
REACTION Energy from Earth's rotation — NOT from the Sun's radiated heat, as
however it can be misunderstood from some established corridors (SEM: ”Wind energy has its origin in the sun”:
’Coriolis-consumed frictional energy — Earth rotational inertia — is
sun-supported’);
— Earth's angular rotation velocity is neither reduced
nor gained by any insolation power phenomena, what we know, but only reduced by
the friction between solid crust and the above lying air — and also by Moon
Tide and parts below the crust on different compositions.
Shorter:
Coriolis effect on Earth winds takes — consumes — Earth rotational inertia
(motional resistance), slowing down Rotation in time — However very slowly. The
friction is (very) low relative the huge Earth's rotational inertia (i.e.,
inertial moment, Sw, tröghetsmoment). See also The NASA article on WIND AFFECTS EARTH ROTATION.
• AND IT CAN NOT
IN NO MOTHER PHYSICAL WAY BE RESTORED BY ANY KIND OF STAR LIGHT INSOLATION;
• Consumed wind
power means consumed Earth rotational velocity. Feel free to disclaim that part
on any related physics argument: Searched for, none yet found.
Related Conclusion:
• WIND —
friction — is generated by rotation. Not insolation. We will return more in
detail (TheMAL, THERMODYNAMICAL
EQUILIBRIUM) to that part
further, as much as it needs clarification beyond any kind, sort or nature of
doubt.
is due to the work
done by the
driving force F
THE Coriolis first theorem INTEGRAL CONNECTION m(v12 – v02)/2 = F
sinΘ ds
describing the kinetic work connects to The Tram
Resemblance — tram on a radial
rail on a spinning disc:
•
Radially straight out from the rotational center O (Origo) the angle
Theta Θ is equal to 0: The sine
(The Horizontal) of the angle 0°
=
1 in PREFIXxSIN.
Then the
differential path (often s for spatium) becomes the radial
dimension dr.
•
The force F:s projection on the radial extension then becomes a point
with the F-vector as the actually driving/inertially consuming or resulting Coriolis
force, as depicted in TheBASIC: m(v12 – v02)/2 = Fr = Ekin = mv2/2
CoriolisFirst: Coriolis1 ¦ Persson1998p1378
m(v12 – v02)/2 = F
sinΘ dr = F sin0 dr
= F 1 dr = F dr = Fr Meaning (BaseCoriolisAnalogies):
Coriolis’ first
theorem in PREFIXxSIN:
———————————————
PREFIXxSIN ¦
Persson1998p1378
¦ Θ Greek Theta
— The whole action-situation — then — apparently depicts
a TORQUE by a force F on a rod with
length r mounted in a suspension O.
along the projection
of the distance ds
where Θ (Greek Theta) is the angle between F and ds.
The situation also resembles THE ICE
DANCER stretching out the arms on a given angular momentum (J=mvr):
•
With given mass m on a given J, v and r varies inversely
proportional:
• A stretch on r
reduces v — the tram is allowed to freely pace out on the rotating disc
— with the same effect as some part of the disc’s mass is approaching its outer
perimeter. Result: lost disc angular rotation (v) velocity.
The simple
related detailed explanation behind action-rection-cause-effect is accounted
for in TheMAL,
unless already familiar.
In this case, with a tram traveling towards the O center —
the Coriolis force directed upward — would demand a separate engine driving the
tram against the centrifugal force — corresponding to the ice dancer drawing
the arms inward by muscle strength, speeding up the angular velocity.
Then Coriolis’ first theorem is just the more generalized
physical mathematics including the above as its mot fundamental (torque)
application, including any other machinery kinetic composition: Frictionally
related motion of a body m on a rotating disc, as stated.
— But we have to be careful on this generalization —
because it is all a matter of Relating a Frictional Agent, securing the actual
Kinetic Energy transfer that defines the whole Coriolis complex — no Hollywood Coriolis Video Shooting projectiles. See CoriolisCINEMA, and the Persson1998 remark on the same subject (no kinematics).
With some
guarantee, awe and wonder:
— The most — simple — complicated, misunderstood,
misapprehended and definitely fundamentally established unrelated here
known subject in the (complete) general complex of modern academic natural
science:
The Coriolis’ second theorem:
” Three years later, in 1835, Coriolis went back to analyze the relative motion associated with the system, in particular the centrifugal force. It is directed perpendicular to the moving body’s trajectory (seen from a fixed frame of reference), which for a stationary body is radially out from the center of rotation. For a moving body this is not the case; it will point off from the center of rotation. The centrifugal force can therefore be decomposed into one radial centrifugal force, m ω² r, and another, –2 m ω v, the “Coriolis force.” It is worth noting that Coriolis called the two components “forces centrifuges composées” and was interested in “his” force only in combination with the radial centrifugal force to be able to compute the total centrifugal force.”,
” FIG. 7. Coriolis’s second theorem is most easily understood when the rotating system is
viewed first from a fixed frame of reference (a), then in the rotating frame of reference (b).
The total centrifugal force acting on the body m moving with a velocity V is directed perpendicular to the tangent of the movement, along the radius of curvature (Fig. 6a). It can be decomposed into two centrifugal forces; one m ω² r, directed from the center of rotation and a second, –2mV, ω, the Coriolis force, perpendicular to the relative motion Vr (Fig. 6b).”,
Persson1998 p1378 column2 top, with bottom FIG.7
IT IS ABSOLUTELY IMPERATIVE (Coriolis2)[text in quote also above] TO VIEW THE PERSSSON1998 ILLUSTRATION HERE FOR THOROUGH AND RELATED ANALYSIS AND REFERENCE:
TheCOR2 PRECISE AND ACCOUNTED CALCULATED EXEMPLIFIED QUANTITIES FOR EXACT AND THOROUGH COMPARISON, REFERENCE AND ANALYSIS
We set up a two
disc rotational Coriolis’ First Theorem Example with
all the parametric values (from a spread sheet) — with all the connecting
formula — so we have an exact preference of comparison for any kind and nature
of questioning on the resulting figures in this demanding complex of terms and
their simple but extensive mathematics (COR2) — along with
what is available for us to study on established premises from text book claims
and definitions in established corridors.
We continue to follow Persson1998 is his page1378 Coriolis2 theorem description — and see if and how there are
agreements with our COR2
Coriolis’ First Theorem applied results — or not (compare MAL5).
” .. the centrifugal force. It is directed perpendicular to the moving body’s trajectory (seen from a fixed frame of reference), which for a stationary body is radially out from the center of rotation.”,
Persson1998p1378 column2 top
FOR OUR CLARITY, WE MUST EMPHASIZE THAT DESCRIPTION SO, as
here related:
.. the centrifugal
force. It is directed perpendicular to
the moving body’s trajectory (seen from AN ESTABLISHED IDEA OF THE FIX STARS
CONVENTIONALLY NAMED A fixed frame of reference), which for a FIX MASS POINT m ON THE ROTATING DISC’S stationary NOT ROTATING OR
ACCELERATING body is radially out from the center of THE STATIONARY DISC’S
rotation CENTER.
That is also perfectly clear for us in any rotational
application, as is the definition of centrifugal and centripetal acceleration (TheMAL) — and in general any single moving mass along a curved
(accelerated, centrifugated) path.
” For a moving body this is not the case; it will point off from the center of rotation.”,
Persson1998p1378 column2 top
FOR OUR CLARITY, as related:
For a moving MASS POINT-m-body MOVING ON
THE ROTATING DISC
— AS IN A ROTATION OR OTHER: BECAUSE JUST MOVING — AS IN
A CONSTANT LINEAR PATH — MAKES NOTHING TO THE SITUATION —
this is not the
case; it THE
CENTRIFUGAL FORCE LINE will point off from the center of rotation.
That
is perfectly verified (COR2): Our set up comparing two disc rotation system shows
exactly that: m(Disc2) is
rotating on a Disc1 with a tap disc center distance d0 between them.
But
.. Issue1:
— Here some divergent issues begin
dropping in. Persson1998FIG.7:
” The total centrifugal force acting on the body m moving with a velocity V is directed perpendicular to the tangent of the movement, along the radius of curvature (Fig. 6a).”,
NOT VERIFIED:
Not verified:
The total centrifugal force acting on the body m moving with a VECTOR SUMMED RESULTING velocity V is not directed
perpendicular to the tangent of the movement OF THE m-BODY.
— And?
• The reason is apparent and clear from the
results in the set up two disc complex:
tanE° = cosA/(sinA+d0–C0)
centrifugation action line slope C0.m.d0 —— m-velocity independent
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
C0 = d0(1+[t0/t]²)–1 = d0(1+[f /f0]²)–1
With d0 ¦ t1 ¦ t2 as 1.5 ¦ 1 ¦ 2 C0 becomes 1.5/5 = 0.3 from the Disk1 Origo tap center.
PROJECTIVE FEATURES REVEAL HIDDEN EXPLANATIONS
’NO SUCH CONNECTION EXISTS’
The total centrifugal force acting on the body m moving with a VECTOR SUMMED RESULTING velocity V has no physical-mathematical perpendicularity property for a
Coriolis effect different from zero.
— Close, yes. But not exact. No such connection exists. See why:
On the other
hand — if we »omit some incongruities»: The vCEN (smallBlue) IS
perpendicular to the Coriolis acceleration and Coriolis force — in full concord
with Coriolis’ first theorem . But as the vCEN is NOT the actual m-body
motional resulting velocity (V), the established Coriolis second theorem
description apparently ANYWAY becomes deeply corrupted.
• A vCEN
from the resulting V has to be — Coriolis’
first theorem, TheBASIC — PROJECTED ON An existent cenLINE (E°) for a
Coriolis effect to show.
IF that projection, namely, is exactly at a right angle,
no value, no Coriolis effect exists: no mV-projection
to trigger a response.
Issue2: Issue1
But
.. Issue2 ¦ 1:
” It can be decomposed into two centrifugal forces; one m ω² r, directed from the center of rotation and a second, –2mV, ω, the Coriolis force, perpendicular to the relative motion Vr (Fig. 6b).” ,
If we compare our set up two disc complex COR2, safely based on Coriolis’
theorem 1, there are apparently some missing issues missing in the
above Persson1998 described Coriolis’ second theorem:
It seems modern academy haven’t penetrated even half of
the underlying Coriolis Physics phenomena ..
Although
mentioned by Persson1998 of a deviating centrifugal line of action, quotes
below, Persson1998 — or other most appearing texts on the subject — mentions
nothing about a calculation of a
resulting centrifugation center (C0) — as a result of a a rotating mass (Disc2)
under centrifugal influence from a second main rotating body (Disc1). Our set
up test on the two rotating discs: Disc2 mounted on Disc1 with a tap distance
of 1.5 units. Both discs rotating counterclockwise — with a corresponding test
on Coriolis’ second theorem, as stated.
rC02 = (d0 – C0 + r0sinA)2 + (r0cosA)2 = r0 (sinA + d0 – C0)/sinE ¦ vCENslope ¦ PREFIXxSIN
VERIFIED is the corresponding Disc1’s centrifugal
component, the above given Persson1998 quote: ’ It can be decomposed into two .. one mω²r,
directed from the center of rotation ’ ON DISC1’S ORIGO O.
— But FROM WHERE on Earth comes the other — claimed .. mVω? ”two centrifugal forces”.
Is the
Person1998 text MESSAGING (»don’t kill the mailman») Coriolis or EXPLAINING
Coriolis?
• The Coriolis
force (and acceleration) is very well a result of centrifugation. But it is not
centrifugal acceleration and force itself (MAL5).
• The Coriolis’ first theorem states that it is so, and too so exceptionally clearly,
in advising the Coriolis acceleration to be perpendicular to the
centrifugal acceleration (TheMAL).
• WHAT WE HENCE
WOULD HAVE EXPECTED from the Persson1998/1835Coriolis’ second theorem (in
explanation) would be as the above illustrated two disc rotational vector
resultants expose:
— As stated, and verified by quality however not by
quantity,
” .. the centrifugal force. For a moving body this is not the case; it will point off from the center of rotation.”, column2 top and further in
the resulting
centrifugal line (cenLINE) from the two
rotating disks is calculated in
COR2 as
the centrifugating vector resultant
RESULTING
CENTRIFUGATION (aC) PREFIXxSIN:
K° = 180 – (A° – acos[r0cosA°/r])
aC = √ ω²r(ω²r)0[(ω²r)0/ω²r + ω²r/(ω²r)0
– 2sinK°] resulting centrifugal acceleration
maC = the resulting
centrifugating force
as situated on the E° cenLINE
one of a kind DISC1’s (ω²r)1
one of a kind DISC2’s (ω²r)0 ....... where?
tanE° =
cosA/(sinA+d0–C0)
centrifugation action line slope C0.m.d0 —— m-velocity independent
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
C0 = d0(1+[t0/t]²)–1 = d0(1+[f /f0]²)–1
With d0 ¦ t1 ¦ t2 as 1.5 ¦ 1 ¦ 2 C0 becomes 1.5/5 = 0.3 from the Disk1 Origo tap center.
• But as we see:
no corresponding Persson1998 a Disc2 centrifugal component (ω²r)0 is included in claiming Coriolis’ second
theorem
— Why? (Because Persson1998 is messaging, not explaining Coriolis .. which hides from us in explanations ..)
— We would expect that some QUANTITATIVE measure would or should resolve this dilemma. And once and for all clarify the quest.
— See example further (from Issue1) below how the ”2ωv” factor proves »hidden resources» in this COR2 reckoning vector test.
” It can be decomposed into two centrifugal forces; one m ω² r, directed from the center of rotation and a second, –2mV, ω, the Coriolis force, perpendicular to the relative motion Vr (Fig. 6b).” ,
• (ω²r)1
..................... Persson1998/Coriolis1832
CoriolisFirst verified Disc1 centrifugal
acceleration component in COR2
• (ω²r)0
..................... Persson1998/Coriolis1832
CoriolisFirst
not
verified Disc2 centrifugal acceleration
component in COR2
• IT APPARENTLY
JUST SO SEEMS THAT the Persson1998/1835Coriolis’ ” .. Vω” »second centrifugal force component» has been imported
in the dark from some here not familiar region — not more specified or related
in any kind or sort of detail (TheMAL).
WITH a Coriolis’ first theorem-physical substance
— the (vertical; y) Coriolis acceleration ωvr part is always directed perpendicular to a
Centrifugation force Action Line vector (horizontal; x) quantity ω²r
— the above cited suggested theorem of uniting these two
to a single one and also apparently adding a third (dotted) resultant ”.. it will point off from the center of rotation.”
— may be whatever it may be. But it has apparently on this point no rational,
logical, physical or mathematical connection — no explanation — to the COR2 disc rotating examining example:
• The only
available vector resulting centrifugal line to which we can relate a
perpendicular Coriolis’ first theorem Coriolis effect, is the above related
cenLINE on angle E°:
• Consequently,
on a right angle from IT, the Coriolis effect should HAVE been explained in
Persson1998’s text.
• But as seen: it does not.
IF SOMEBODY CLAIMS TO KNOW SOMETHING (TheBASIC), WHY WOULD IT BE SO HARD TO EXPLAIN IT (TheMAL)? THERE SHOULD BE NOT THE SLIGHTEST PROBLEM WITH THAT.
WINING ON ”COMPLICATED MATHEMATICS” IS NO EXCUSE: IF ”THE MATHEMATICS IS SO
COMPLICATED THAT IT ESCAPES HUMANITY IN GENERAL” SOMETHING IS REALLY BADLY WRONG
— NOT WITH HUMANITY. More so with the inducement of understanding its
basics: the deduction, not invention, of math.
TESTING a further quantity check on the Persson/Coriolis’
”2ωvr” from our results shows some wider openings:
We have a resulting equivalent
aCEN = ω²rC0 from which we take
ω = √aCEN/rC0
together with the
vCEN v-resultant
(V) projection along the E° cenLINE, forming a principle
principal
aCOR = ωv — or a more modern academic possible 2ωv
ditto at test;
We find (COR2 results) that (rounded) with A° =
83.6200851..°
V · vCEN = –16 M/S with (= our deduced aCOR × 2)
(ω = √ aCEN/rC0)vCEN = aCOR
–8.00 M/S² featuring a modern academic proof that
aCOR = 2ωvCEN = ωV for what it is
worth (»The V» in Issue1) —
V and vCEN
are perpendicular. In mingling these without distinction, as suggested by the
example — to match modern corridors expressions — the subject definitely
becomes severely corrupted:
• and we cannot successfully
deal with that type of verification except when digging garbage
• expecting a V
for a vCEN at such an appropriate site:
• aCOR = ωvCEN it is and no other — in
full concord with Coriolis’ first theorem: ωvr .
• Modern
academic vector algebra (Persson1998¦1)
apparently has issues. Deep ones. Very — unless this physics presentation is
Pluto.
It seems we have encountered a scientific havoc:
Someone — apparently the whole scientific community 1800+ — invented a mathematical algorithm from which physics is promted, never deduced, only dictated;
• What is the purpose of caring for a system of bodies (our COR2 two disc set up Coriolis mathematics test) with internal VECTORS — if only one of these bodies’ vector forms are observed?
• On every curved path of a body’s motion (as ideally situated in space, far from other bodies, to exclude any eventual significant measurable influence) there is in each moment of move a corresponding detectable CENTER OF ROTATION — a centrifugal line — from which the moving body strives to escape — finding its A continued tangential linear path. This is also what Persson1998Coriolis2FIG.7 says in his text,
” .. the centrifugal force. It is directed perpendicular to the moving body’s trajectory.”.
• In Persson1998/Coriolis’ second theorem text, however as quoted, this seems only to pertain to the main Origo O’s Disc1, the verified variable centrifugal component ω²r.
We did clarify in VERIFIED the
partly haze in the quoted text as — possibly — pertaining to a typical two disc
rotating system »curved move on a curved move», even if the text explicitly
does not mention such an arrangement (non accelerated moves excluded).
• The constant O’ rotating Disc2’s component (ω²r)0 seems not to have a representation.
• Why?
— Because the established Coriolis physics cannot handle that type .. If it could: why not?
• THE FASTER IT ROTATES — t0→0; f0→∞
C0/t² = nC0/nt² = d0/(t² + t0²) ;
C0 = d0t²/(t² + t0²) = d0/(1 + t0²/t²) = d0/(1 + [t0/t]²) = d0/(1 + [ω/ω0]²)
C0 = d0(1+[t0/t]²)–1 = d0(1+[f /f0]²)–1
With d0 ¦ t1 ¦ t2 as 1.5 ¦ 1 ¦ 2 C0 becomes 1.5/5 = 0.3 from the Disk1 Origo tap center.
— the closer C0 approaches the Disc2’s origo-tap O’, the tap distance d0 — the vector resultant centrifugal reference point of centrifugation, the C0 point.
• Why isn’t that vector component and its summation even mentioned or commented?
• Why is only the deviating centrifugal line mentioned, not its mathematics?
Test answer: Because, in
fact, the Persson1998 text has general established implications of Kinematics —
general motion without the forces included — not present in Coriolis Dynamics
Kinetics: Coriolis’ first theorem.
As far as here is known, there is no other answer to that question than this, seemingly very absurd one:
• they don’t care. Do you see any?
• they have their eyes focused on something else, obscuring the complex explanation.
(It is not a scientific subject. It is a scientific havoc).
THE SOURCE BEHIND THE MODERN ACADEMIC CLAIMED 2ωv property — where it comes from — because it apparently has no connection to the vector resultants by thorough deduced mathematics in our COR2 two disc example.
’ TREMENDOUS TOOL OF RATIONALIZATION ’
” The second theme requires a
quite complex, even for the modern standard, mathematical apparatus; it opened
the way to the rational mechanics of the XX century, characterizedby the introduction of a
general formulation and a renewed form of geometrical and algebraic
language;
for example the vector algebra—widely known at the end of the XIX century—turned out to be a tremendous tool of rationalisation.”,
Internet preview books — limited access, text sample 1Aug2022 from
7.3 Perfecting the Theoretical Aspects — Coriolis Theorems (year and author missing)
AFTER 200 YEARS FROM 1800:
SWEDEN — once a placid place — 2022 north to south: even
more heavy further reductions of original natural forests. Sweden:
lost manifest.
— Sweden is accelerating its governmental care for Universal Animal Rights ..
— Is that you best shot?
Apparently Not on this planet anyway.
— IF so a ”tremendous tool of rationalization”, where do we find one single example WITH nature? Please share. Show us.
Complementary sources testify that the use of the typical expression ”2ωv” apparently also was claimed by Coriolis himself (1835):
’ TWICE THE PRODUCT ’
” In a second paper, Sur les equations du mouvement relatifdes systemes
de corps,1 Coriolis wrote —
" In this paper I give the following general proposition — that to
establish an equation
of the relative motion of
a system of
bodies
or of any machine, it suffices to add to the existing forces two kinds
of supplementary forces. The first are always those to which it is
necessary to have regard for the equation of living forces ; that is,
which are the forces opposed to those which are able to keep the
particles constantly connected with movable planes. The second are
directed perpendicularly to the relative
velocities and to the axes
of rotation of the movable planes ;
they are equal to twice the product
of the angular velocity
of the movable planes and the
relative quantity
of motion on a plane perpendicular to this axis. "
”, INTERNET ARCHIVE, 1Aug2022
Full text of "A HISTORY OF MACHANICS"
Traditional machine written
text, partly cryptic, partly not easy to understand in context
Either we still have to educate our thinking in keeping up in pace with these ancient math aces. Or we are reading an artifact from a portal in scientific history that did lose some vital parts of the mother ship.
• Note again the general use of the term ”motion”: In terms of Coriolis’ first theorem we have no interest in other ”motion” than accelerated motions. Preferentially such as ideally rotating discs (Earth and its weather systems in concern: wind power issues).
• We have — here — absolutely no reference at all what Coriolis is aiming at in his ”movable planes”. It is a complete hieroglyph here.
— Until we will be enlightened on that part, any further attempt to understand what Coriolis is describing, as in terms of his use of ”ordinary centrifugal forces”, the source above (not further cited here), becomes a complete riddle: we can guess but don’t know what the man is talking about.
A (still) deeper dive on the origin of the ”2ωv” expression shows stations as below:
” Important Misprints in the Journal de l’École Polytechnique
Reading Coriolis’s papers is quite difficult from a mathematical point of view, but also some misprints at crucial locations force the reader (either the current reader or of the time) to make rectifications to follow his reasoning ..”, bibnum.education (1Aug2022),
CORIOLIS:
THE BIRTH OF A FORCE — by Alexandre Moatti ¦ Chief Mining Engineer, Doctor in
History of Science ¦ Associate Researcher at the University of Paris-VII ¦
2011¦2014
http://www.bibnum.education.fr/sites/default/files/analyse-coriolis-force-en.pdf
:
bibnum.education (1Aug2022), Moatti211p9
The Moatti2011 text source verifies that the type expression ”2ωv” has a
genuine Coriolis origin: ”.. they are equal to
twice
the product ..”, the lower part of the quote. The source however also is remarking (without further clarification, p12) that
” The modern meaning of the
Coriolis force is 
, with
the coefficient 2;
Coriolis himself did not take steps to include the coefficient 2 in what he refers to
as ‘compound centrifugal forces’.
”, Moatti211p12
Such remarks — without further — apparently only contributes to a The Plot Thickens: We really don’t get much out of these established text sources — on the subject ”2ωv”. From where does it come? (Everybody uses it, nobody can explain it).
• From a given STATE of a defined EQUILIBRIUM — balance — to ANOTHER such state, differing any the slightest from the previous, is ALWAYS WITHOUT EXCEPTION associated with an ACCELERATION (a=dv/dt) — even weighing a letter on a balance:
• There are only TWO kinds of such an acceleration, a change: 1. LINEAR and 2.CENTRIFUGAL (RelatedLiRaNo):
• GRAVITATION, to exemplify,
is mathematically defined and deduced by detail ENTIRELY FROM centrifugal acceleration (TheMAL: ω²r = [2πr/t]²/r = [2π/t]²r²/r).
• SO — when in established texts we come to such wordings as ”inertial acceleration” — 59 300 results 4Aug2022 @Internet — we are talking SCIENTIFIC HAVOC (Q4) — in any reasonable understatement of »what The F-word the man is talking about»: not recognized:
• they don’t understand the concept. THEY have a 200 year MERIT imitated established mathematical algorithm named HIGH SCHOOL EDUCATION (vector algebra on a matrix scale that completely gives a shit on basic physics). And outside that one: nothing. Blank. Zero. Proof: Ask the average pedestrian: »My favorite subject is really Math. Love it». Say again.
Meaning:
• Understanding physics and mathematics cannot be done on the present scientific established nomenclature. It kills humanity — into a merit established traditional type: kill the planet. Says related physics and mathematics. Say it: you are dead end wrong. Show us. Give examples. Prove this author is wrong. Say again. Come again.
• The only reasonable MEANING coming out of the present scientific community is IF THE APPARATUS IN CALL IS ACCOUNTED FOR IN DETAIL along with its mathematical claims so we can study a RELATED DESCRIPTION on a so translated perfectly related UNDERSTANDABLE MATH (COR2). ”inertial acceleration”? Come again.
Compare the Q4 Wikipedia sentence, reading »non-accelerating acceleration».
We’re apparently done here (RelatedPhysics).
A final found text source refers the modern academic vector algebra mathematical deduction of the ”2ωv” expression origin. It is found at the end of a lengthy but detailed vector algebra description in
” This is the five-term acceleration equation. The five accelerations, though they arose simply from applying the product rule to vector differentiation, can be ascribed definitive physical meaning.”,
ROTATING
REFERENCE FRAME AND THE FIVE-TERM ACCELERATION EQUATION by Frank Owen, PhD,
P.E., www.aoengr.com
©All rights reserved
http://www.aoengr.com/Dynamics/RotatingReferenceFrame.pdf
SUMMATION — what about ”Coriolis’ second theorem”?
With lack of further
clarifications by practical examples, Coriolis’ second theorem hides from an
understandable explanation comparable with Coriolis’ clear cut first theorem (CoriolisFirst)
No more no less — in full concord with Coriolis’ first theorem:
• Coriolis force is always directed perpendicular to the mass-body’s Coriolis-effect affecting velocity (vCEN).
— So loosely formulated, the COR2 two disc example attests the detailed results by example.
ZeroINTEGRAL: Compilation Jul2022
The ZERO
INTEGRAL — absent in MAC
Formlaws ¦ PositionFORM: THE variation FORM FOR ZERO (tangent function: y/x = TanA°) — compare terminology in modern quarters, if at all existent, with this related mathematics (Dn abbreviated for Derivation [of the expression or function], Swedish Derivatan till/för/av):
Dn y = y’ = dy/dx =
(y0–y)/(x0–x) → Formlaws ¦ y’dx = dy ¦ 
dy
= y = y’dx
;
-------------------
y = y – y(0) = y – Q — the definite integral underlined y is defined by Q in y=0 with x=0 — EX: y = y – y(0) = (1+x)2 – (1+0)2 = (1+x)2 – 1; Q=–1.
------------------
Q in related mathematics is termed INTEGRAL
CONSTANT. What is known here: Modern academic nomenclature has it not. See the
Modern ”The C” below.
• In cases of exponential functions — no y-crossings — a separate constant
[C] must be added — and determined — for the function to be useful.
EX: y = 1/x — a
definite Q cannot be determined. Solution: y = 1/[x+C] — the function is slided
on the negative x-side over the y-axis; y = 1/[x+C] — 1/C.
PerfectAssembly.
a determined, definite, integral — area — is always reckoned — beginning — from — related to — zero.
The terminology has no representation in modern academic
teaching system — apparently because of the modern academic violation ”Δx=dx”:
the [1800+] comprehensive banning of STATE as the preference
in physics and mathematics — instead inventing [EARP] ”INERTIAL
SYSTEM”
— an Invented object for Comprehending »physical state». The
NATURAL STATE basic however is basically just another form for Newton’s 3:
a constant has
no variation.
Further clarified and exemplified below.
That banning — apparently not by explicit proclamation, what
we know, but rather from a DRIFTING CONSEQUENCE in NOT deducing the math but
[1800+] inventing it[‡]
— generated extensive consequences in apprehending the basics in and of
integral, differential and derivative mathematics — responsible for
promoting a condition of guaranteed NOT UNDERSTANDING THE
BASICS — with further. There are innumerable examples: Please do correct if
faulty.
y0=y=C
=constant = k ¦ y’ = dy/dx = (y0–y)/dx
= (k–k)/dx = (0)/dx
= 0 ¦ dy
= y = 0 dx = 0 dx
= 0 ·x = 0 ;
compare modern
academic teaching system
[1800+] — see ComparingQuotes:
— the term for C in MAC is ”INTEGRATION CONSTANT”, while
that for Q
in related mathematics is INTEGRAL CONSTANT by direct determination.
— ”»WHEREAS the derivative to a
constant C equals zero, it holds that 0 · dx = C»” — modern academic 1800+ Earth
established IQ. Must BuyBook.
compare, related
physics:
— Yes. Absolutely. The derivative to a constant C is zero, absolutely, no doubt about it, 100%. BUT so not because the derivative to a constant IS zero.
But because a derivative to a constant does not exist. (C–C)/dx = (0)/dx = 0. Stop inventing something out of nothing. Please.
• The integral concept must in all cases have some existent factor — not an invented one as is the case in modern quarters (1800+) — to have a logic, rational, and resonable connection to mathematics, especially mathematical physics. The mission in our universe, as experienced, is comprehending the NATURE of physics. NOT imitating an invented status of Modern Academic Consensus. Say again: relate the math. STATE. Not ”system”. Say.
y0=kx0
, y=kx ¦ y’ = dy/dx = (y0–y)/(x0–x)
= (kx0–kx)/(x0–x) = k(x0–x)/(x0–x)
= k ¦
dy
= y = k dx = k dx
= k · x = kx ;
— FoumForMATH— where? Please share. Searched for. None yet found.
Readability of
mathematical expressions: The early
computer age Microsoft standard (word processors) had a good standard practice:
the Greek alphabet SYMBOL (Ctrl+Shift+Q) transferred directly characters such
as the pi ( p → 
) to the corresponding some two millennium
Standard Scientific typography. Later came (other) Web-Readers not caring at
all for Traditional Scientific standards — Type Firefox. When that was
discovered, the UH documents had already some 10 years of Symbol notification
incorporated. These older UH-documents will NOT be mathematically readable in
using a web reader of type Firefox. Internet Explorer and Google CHROME (both
fuzzy small text and bad tabbing) and Safari (good at both) still reads Symbol
(2022).
In — so related mathematics (Introduction) — we use the nomenclature of VARIANTS (y’=dy/dx) from DIFFERENTIALS (dy/dx) written as DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS (dy=y’dx) with INTEGRALS (∫ dy = ∫ y’dx = ∫ f ’[x]dx = f [x]) as their solutions — and their more generalized UNIVERSALS (y=f [x]+C) where C is any possible thinkable mathematical physical EQUATION CONSTANT (it has no such here known connectivity in modern corridors). The related MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE in the complex is termed CLASSIFICATION OF VARIANTS — first and n:th order variants, generally named differential equations in modern corridors, with »sub-sectional supporting-mathematics» (integral Interface’s FunctionRANGES).
One of these — the generalized solution of the 2:nd order variants — has definite Modern Academic Issues all students horror — connecting to the above mentioned modern academic term (C) integration constant. Namely in UNDERSTANDING why (and how) the ranks behave as they do (single double-root second order variant: the fundamental integral’s generalization — the paragraphs on real multiple roots and pairwise complex roots): impossible to deduce-understand with the present established mathematical nomenclature (related: variants and their universals) as related[‡].
Short:
• Modern academic teaching system apparently cannot handle neither mathematics nor physics WITHOUT BREACHING — veritably attacking — THOSE NATURAL BARRIERS which by relatable comprehensible principle SECURE A TRUE AND GENUINE UNDERSTANDING OF MATH IN EXPLICIT — and thereby physics:
SWEDEN — once a placid place — 2022 north to south: even
more heavy further reductions of original natural forests. Sweden:
lost manifest.
— Sweden is accelerating its
governmental care for Universal Animal Rights ..
Say it: You are wrong: Modern academy 1800+ lost humanity’s natural comprehensible MANIFEST, resulting in a lost ON-RAMP to true technological development — with nature. Not against her. 200 years of solid proofs: state attacks nature — by DRIFT. Not plan.
Do question and disclaim the stated on any relatable argumentation, if anyone can. It is knowledge wee seek. Not consensus.
Say again.
The600GWexample: The original: The600GWexample
THE SIMPLER ENHANCED 600GW EXAMPLE
Testing
THE WIND
INTRODUCTION ON EARTH ROTATION AS THE ONLY WIND SUSTAINING
DRIVING ENGINE
Enhanced
600GW Wind Power examining example
(TheOriginal in zGMR2019 — a less
developed now archive reference section — had not these present provisions)
—
11Aug2022 — simple wind power friction energy calculations
Because
there is no restoration physics for (E0) Earth's rotational energy, once it is
lost — naturally by Moon Tides, inner crust and mantle different material
compositions and states, and (2003NASAarticle)
surface wind conditions (very roughly resulting in some 2 mS difference per
100y, see Wikipedia Earth's rotation and Leap second) — we can perform a most
very simplified wind power reckoning expedition on Earth's known rotational
energy:
energy
against energy.
WHATEVER
THE AMOUNT OF TAKEN DOWN ENERGY FROM AIR TO GROUND BY MOUNTING UP EXTRA AIR
FRICTION ABSORBING DEVICES — WIND POLE-EXTRACTING WIND POWER TO GROUND STATIONS
OR OTHER — ONCE TAKEN, THERE IS NO CORRESPONDING NATURAL MACHINERY THAT IS
SPINNING THE LOST EARTH ROTATION UP AGAIN TO ITS PREVIOUS LOST LEVEL.
(there
is no delivering of Eternal Free Earth Rotational Energy — but many would perhaps
wish that these days).
So
we only have to solve some relatively simple math expressions in order to find
out on what time scale a certain (industrial) wind power effect (P Watt) during
a certain period of time (t) will remove
THAT Earth rotational energy (E=Pt) WHICH slows
down Earth's rotation significantly on the order of milliseconds (t).
We
will use the already Earth sphere inertial rotational energy deduced basic
forms (RexJorSamb
¦ Integral
Moment — Dynamic
Gravity-Radius Circles ¦ The Sphere) with
k = (mJ=5.975 T24 KG) · 0.8π · (rJeq = 6.378 T6 M) = 9.578 T31 KG·M ; r =
rJeq√4/10 ;
E0
= mv²/2 = pv/2 = k fSPIN · v/2
= k/t0² · π · r = 1.626 T29 J = Earth's spherical rotational energy source.
We
solve on Earth's revolution period t0:
t0²
= (k/E0)πr ; t0 =
√ kπr/E0 ; ANY SLIGHTEST EXTENDED
REVOLUTION PERIOD WOULD YIELD
t
= t1 – t0 = (√ kπr
)(1/√E1 — 1/√E0) WHERE E1 =
E0 — E WITH E = Pt = WS =
Joule;
WE
WRITE THE RECKONING CODE IN A SPREAD SHEET (Here OpenOffice SwedishEdition),
adapted to solve for the t result — in milliseconds (mS). With given P and t, t shows:
———————————————————————————————————
P t + t ¦ mS source
———— ——— ———— ————————————————————————
600GW 100y 0.5 2019 World wind turbine marked top
effect
18TW 100y 15.1 BP statistics 2020, world consumption
400TW 100y 335.4 InsideScience
— max usable
1700TW 100y 1425.4 Archer2012
(Measured wind power 100M altitude)
———————————————————————————————————
“SUSTAINABLE
ENERGY”.
That
is apparently more than dangerously close to tampering on already complicated
(international) contributions in handling (Wikipedia) “Leap Seconds” — and whatever
the environmental consequences would become.
CALCULUS
CARDS (Sw. Kalkylkort) are based on the Swedish version of OpenOffice Spread
sheet documents.
It was
generally integrated in this UNIVERSE HISTORY production as a math results
exact reference in the original Swedish text editions.
—
Here, it (the cell programming commands) is in conflict with the English
version — and there is not much to do about that. Except possibly to have two
or several language versions on the same computer — automatically transferring
the one to the other. However no such solution is known at the present.
Coriolis2022.ods
kalkylkorten nedan DIREKT FRÅN DEN
HÄR WEBBLÄSAREN Coriolis2022.ods —
se öppningsmanual
om ej redan bekant — eller kopiera URL:en nedan till valfri webbläsare
(vilket som fungerar — förutsatt att SVENSKA VERSIONEN av gratisprogramvaran
OPEN OFFICE finns installerad på datorn)
http://www.universumshistoria.se/AaKort/Coriolis2022.ods
Coriolis2022.ods
CALCULUS CARDS
— An accounted exposition for
the calculated math parts of this production in spread sheet cells
(OpenOffice, however here the cell coding only as delivered in the Swedish edition)
Tabell1 ......... REDUCING Earth's rotational energy — calculations 11Aug2022
Tabell2 ......... GLOBAL
WIND CONDITIONS Ground wind speeds
Tabell3 ......... COR2 cell codes and graphs (draft)
Tabell4 ........ COR2 cell codes and graphs (final)
Tabell5......... NORTH HEMISPHERE COMPILED GLOBAL SUMMER-WINTER East-West WIND SPEEDS from FOCUS MATERIEN 1975s514
All Cal-Cards in UniverseHistory are direct Open-Access available for inspection, test, and analyze of the results presented — or for the user to experiment himself if so wished (if »destructed by accident» just open a new original one and try again, NoProblemo).
SOME WEB BROWSERS DO NOT RESPECT THIS OPEN FEATURE. BUT BLOCKS THE USER FROM TAKING ADVANTAGE OF A FREE AND OPEN SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY. We do not have locks among friends (I have no enemies ..). AND BESIDES: THERE IS NOTHING TO HIDE. Thank you very much.
END.
GMR2022
GMR2022 — summing up
Persson1
¦ Persson2 ¦ Persson3
¦ Persson1998fig7
[HOP]. HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGraw-Hill
1967
Atomviktstabellen i HOP allmän
referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 s9–65—9–86.
mn =
1,0086652u ...................... neutronmassan
i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]
me =
0,000548598u .................. elektronmassan
i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3
s7–155 för me , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]
u = 1,66043 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27,
1967]
u = 1,66033
t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular
Weight]
u = 1,66041 t27 KG
............... atomära massenheten
[FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]
u = 1,66053886 t27 KG ........ atomära
massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL-506W
(2005)]
u = 1,6605402 t27 KG .......... atomära
massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]
u = 1,660538782 t27
KG ...... atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],
CODATA
rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe
on Data for Science and Technology)]
c0 = 2,99792458 T8 M/S ........ ljushastigheten
i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på
1970-talet)]
h = 6,62559 t34 JS ................. Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]
—
Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet
i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.
[FM]. FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 — Fysikens, kemins och astronomins
historia. Allt från atomen till universum — fysik, kemi, jordvetenskap och
astronomi
[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12
band A(1922)-Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT A-Ö(1929)
t för 10–, T för 10+,
förenklade exponentbeteckningar
MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern
ACademy — etablerad vetenskap
sedan början av 1800-talet
In UH often used abbreviation for modern academy — explicitly from the
beginning of the 1800s
TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS —
Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.
Toroid Nukleära Elektro
MEKANISKA Dynamiken
(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska
Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som
följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=mnc0rn,
analogt Atomkärnans
Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad, vilket innebär: alla,
samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt logiskt förklarbara och
begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således) också
RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED
i Atomkärnans Härledning.
SHORT ENGLISH —
TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain
(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).
TNED or Toroid
Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting
description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’
Deduction. The description according to TNED is related,
meaning: all, each, details claim to be fully logically explainable and
understandable, or not at all. With TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED
PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’
Deduction.
Senast uppdaterade version: 2024-03-23.
*END.
Stavningskontrollerat-SpellChecked up to: 17Jun2022 ¦
30Jul2022 ¦ 7Aug2022.
rester
*
åter till portalsidan ·
portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se
∫ ∫ Δ √ Δ ≠ →∞
√ ω π τ ε ħ UNICODE — ofta använda tecken
i matematiska-tekniska-naturvetenskapliga beskrivningar
— Ctrl+Shift+Q i Microsoft WORD direkt till SYMBOL
— som INTE Firefox vill läsa:
Firefox skriver Ö istf. rottecknet, m.fl. Upptäcktes
sent, då redan många htm-dokument skrivits.
σ
ρ ν ν υ π τ γ λ η ≠
√ ħ ω →∞ →γ ≡ ¦ Alt+ 1..9 ☺☻♥☺♦♣♠•◘○
Ω
Φ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ
α
β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ
ϕ σ ω ϖ ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫
≤ ≈ ≥ ˂ ˃ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓
ϑ
ζ ξ
Pilsymboler, direkt via tangentbordet:
Alt+24
↑; Alt+25 ↓; Alt+26 →; Alt+27 ←; Alt+22 ▬
Alt+23
↨ — även Alt+18 ↕; Alt+29 ↔
Senast uppdaterade version: 23 mars
2024 | 21:37:02 | 2024-03-23. [GMT+1]Solar [GMT+2]Industry
*
BILDKÄLLA: Författarens
arkiv · 3Jul2012 E12 Bild 198;293 · Nikon D90 ·
Fria Teckningar — Angående Statens och Kommunernas uppmärksammade
UPPENBART SJUKA NATURUPPFATTNING — civilisationens återerövring.
Denna webbsidas ansvariga författare kan nås med e-mail på
Webbadressen
¦belldharma¦SNABELA¦universumshistoria¦PUNKT¦se¦
åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se