CHEOPS ATLAS PORTAL ¦ UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA | a production 2020III27 | Senast uppdaterade version: 2021-12-31 · Universums Historia

innehåll content denna sida · webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning alla webbsidor

RÉSUMÉ ¦ CheopsATLAS-Begin ¦ CheopsATLAS-Pyramids ¦ CheopsATLAS-TNED ¦ CheopsATLAS-GLACIATION

Cheops Atlas Series Present

PRESENTING THE RESULTS IN ENGLISH FROM THE ORIGINAL PRODUCTION (Oct2020-Nov2021) IN SWEDISH

HOW THE CHEOPS RECTANGLE DID CONNECT EARTH MASS 5.975 AND THE »old school» UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT 6.67

— It was a general cosmological TNED test on the IAU photometric effect — as measured from our sun: 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W

Enhanced and extended version 14Nov2021 — CHEOPS ATLAS SERIES linked CONTENT ¦ ResTAB ¦ MathLIST ¦ EMAG ¦ ITproc ¦ TEB ¦ BinMap ShortSUM

• — What’sUp? Background ¦ SHORT SUMMATION on WORLD health ¦ Special about CORONA PANDEMIC 28Mar2020 — THE OXYGEN QUEST

Cheops Atlas Begin THOUSANDS OF YEARS BACK FROM HERE some established sources claim, in some parts, a no-easy-explainable glaciation history — only over the northern Earth part. THAT promotes a further GeoATLANTIS investigation. • See a SPECIAL TREATISE GLACIATION ARTICLE in this CheopsATLAS series modern rebellious parvenu.

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 222 .. 333 .. ¦ ATLANTIS ¦ GTursprunget2019 ¦ AtlantisAPPENDIX ¦

— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday .. A GEOATLANTIS might EXPLAIN some GLACIATION VARIATIONS — GeoATLANTIS NORTHERN hemisphere glaciation variations ¦ Cheops ATLAS Series

EMAG: Calling

PRESENTING THE original RESULTS IN ENGLISH FROM THE ORIGINAL PRODUCTION (Oct2020-Nov2021) IN SWEDISH

The EARTH MASS AND the Gravitational CONSTANT

HOW THE CHEOPS RECTANGLE DID CONNECT EARTH MASS 5.975 AND THE »old school» UNIVERSAL GRAVITATIONAL CONSTANT 6.67

— It was Oct2020 a general cosmological TNED test on the IAU photometric effect — as measured from our sun: 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W that started it ..

.. with the following simple and straight result:

This remarkable result will be studied in detail further below

First: To complete the IAU test, we must have »an exact value» of the mass of our Sun — now. Why?

IN TNED (IRTeP) all celestial bodies (J=mcr=mK bodies — mass with Kepler momentum makes angular momentum) perform expansion recoils beginning from a decaying neutron Dmax inner exothermal fusion happening in bigger J mother bodies. The recoil force comes along with some primary angular momentum — like the string of water drops (in our experiment without outer angular momentum — but observed inner drop spin) from a previous falling water drop. Its contact with an underlying water surface results in a reverse up shooting recoil — with a (resonant, same conditions recurring) series of differently sized drops — down to microscopical, not directly seen by the naked eye.

anoKEPLER:

What is known in TNED:

— Rather with respect to the J mother body gravity center than the fix stars, each such (primary neutron mass) drop will receive its own specific angular momentum (J=mvr=mK) — independent of all the collected influences from all the other surrounding celestial objects (the conservation of angular momentum). Through it (The J), and an initial high speed escape velocity, the J-body takes on a regular elliptic (or possibly a very circular one) orbit — which it (with zero mass loss) will keep with respect to the J mother body mass (including significant mass losses over long periods of time: our Sun) — unless pushed otherwise. The surrounding bodies can only affect the J body ellipse in its (possible) rotation. Not the actual relationship to the J mother body: That relation — the Kepler momentum (K=vr) — stays put (central force action): or we adopt it to be so in the testing procedure.

— So: We are ONLY interested in

the ANOMALISTIC period of the Earth to Sun Mass determining Keplerian orbit — in TNED cosmological matters.

See the different data we have to our disposal in AVAILABLE TIME DATA.

TESTING ON THE IAU instrument mesasured value 3.8275 ± 0.0014 T24 W of SUN’S PHOTONMETRIC EFFECT

A direct hit Pfme = 3.827500101 came up (Oct2018. diff: 0.000000101) on the first Enter — on the anomalistic Kepler calculated present

mS = Sun mass = 1.989661830 T30 KG — only on the (IES) instrumental epoch standars values. The newer (CES) computerized epoch standard values gave Pfme results outside the IAU tolerance 3.8275000±0,0014 T26 W. Also the WikipediaOct2018 mS1.98847 did pass the IAU test on 3.828179, but with (far less) precision (diff: 0.000678778). Further results are shown below in a separate result table ResTAB.

We will return to those details further below — results are tabled in ResTAB.

— THE TEST includes two sets of standard values for mutual comparison: The older INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH STANDARD (IES 1960-1999) and the newer COMPUTERIZED EPOCH STANDARD (CES 2000+). These are presented together with the actual results in two separate calculating cards (spread sheet Tabell2 and Tabell3 KcellAnalys2018.ods): exactly the same mathematics, only dressed up with different accounted sets of standard parametric values.

The following presentation will expose the entire complex in reckoning detail — the total TNED cosmological universal complex of mathematics — and its background. Preferentially as short as possible — with additional links to the actual (extensive Swedish original sometimes with some additional English, but not always) detailed articles.

But first: Be sure to have spotted

TNED BACKGROUND IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS — for those of us (yet) unfamiliar with the TNED basics: the How and Why.

Because modern PhD:s have a time of their own trying to keep up .. not beacuse of less IQ, but because of less familiarity with its content .. Excuse me.

MathLIST: EMAG

List of the

CENTRAL TNED COSMOLOGICALLY DEDUCED MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS

in CAP 17Oct2021

(TNED DISTRIBUTION OF ELEMENTS formulated first 2003 in Periodic System, then following in DISTRIBUTION OF ELEMENTS [2007]):

IRTeP ¦ CAP ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ TheTEN ¦ AR123 ¦ CWON ¦ CWONsum — Complete Whole Number version of the Earth’s AtmosBiosLitos HONC element’s isotopic distribution, as checked by quantity from the 1900s geologically collected data in available literature (PrimDATA — three TNED collected independent well world wide or native established encyclopedic type sources form a common reference within inward tolerance ±1%).

— Modern Academy (MAC): there is (no longer) any possible mathematical or philosophical or theoretical or logical or rational way to talk yourself out of this — any longer. You’re done.

Do correct if wrong — please do excuse (the author wishes not having had to put such words on paper, it is a horrible sentence):

— EARTH BIOLOGY NATURAL HEALTH CONDITIONS SUFFER FROM YOUR IGNORANCE, AS HERE: PROVABLE IN EVERY DETAIL. IT HAS TO END UNLESS ALL LIFE WILL BE WIPED OUT — AS A RESULT OF YOUR CONSENTIENT IDEAS OF BIOCHEMICAL (and social) CONTEXT (The provable biochemical neutron nuclear matrices — NOT the pharmaceutical industry). Do correct if wrong: YOUR CLASS IS IN THE FARTHEST CORNER OF THE CLASSROOM IN MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS AND BIOLOGY. I would HOPE that someone could reject this claim by more solid scientific argumentation, that it will be the case, in order to eliminate further frustration. But seeking a spot of it has as yet met with no progress. It’s all math and physics.

Earth’s mass in connection to BIOLOGY is explicitly proved — by quantity — in CryP1 — in the 100% natural forest preference MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2:

— The (Wikipedia Nov2021) stated value of Earth mass significants 5.9722 in 5.9722 T24 KG falls outside the CryP1 testing limiting data. Only the 5.975 counts for the CWON version — with a biological tolerance resolution in Standing (S) Nature Forest with life sustaining cyclic (c) on the level of less than ±3 GRAM — IF the significants 5.975 shall stay put (as rounded). No physical counterpart exists, as known, to match such a type of quantitative tolerance: GRAM to T24 KG. It seems totally (insane) ”beyond physics”.

MathLISTiau: MathLISTcap

in The IAU Test

(Oct2018) 16Nov2021:

ALL CONSTANTS WITH SOURCES ARE LISTED IN The Constants, as PRESENTED IN THE ACTUAL CONNECTIONS

————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Sun’s Third Equation Our SUN is IDENTIFIED in TNED by

ε₀ = (ρ_r)²(Gc₀/18) · CMS³V^–1(KG)^–1

ε₀ electric constant 1/R₀c₀ C/VM = A/VMS = 8.8543 t12 C/VM, R₀ space electric resistance, c₀ divergence constant 2.99792458 T8 M/S,

G gravitational constant, with a

Surface density constant:

with

ε₀ the electric constant, G gravitational constant, with

Sun’s Raw Power (Effect)

P = A²ε₀ (1VM^–1C^–1S^–3KG) = 3.3011376 T26 W — pointing to and defining a specific type star with

A as the Sun’s g- spherical area determined by

Sun’s Gravitational Radius (Sun’s measured photometric radius ~ 6.96 T8 M; 1000 KM less) with m_S as our actual SUNnow mass

rG = [ρ_r(8/m_A)^–1/3/r₀]^–1/4(3/4π)^1/3·[(1/m_0SLIM)^1/3 – (1/m_S)^1/3]^–1 = 6.97063467 T8 M »Sun’s ACTIVE Machine Radius» — with

m_A = 1.00782519u hydrogen atom’s mass, u atomic mass unit, r₀ proton radius 1.37 t15 M, m_0SLIM Sun/StarLimit mass 1.204 T28 KG or ~ 6 Jupiter masses

and mS the actual mass of the Sun — changing over time as Sun burns Hydrogen To Helium Sun’s Energy Production —

with e the electron charge, G gravitational constant, and the TNED deduced

The actually instrumentally measured Photometric (Power) Effect

Pfme = P [1 + β(d_C/d_S)] with d_C = 2.96 Å = 2.96 t10 M = 0.296nM and d_S = (m_A/ρ_r)^1/3 = 2.65632 t8 M ~ 266 Å, with

where the Temperature domains Tγ and TP are 2 of the 4 TNED deduced — unknown in modern academy — different forms of the Sun’s 4 heat degrees

— only, what we know, the Planck TP temperature domain is known in modern academy.

GIVEN THESE BASIC MATHEMATICAL CONNECTIONS, TNED adds (K-cell Heat Physics) the following resulting equalities in so deduced quantities:

Right column detailed in m0cK1 with original values (2008) in left column K-cell Heat Physics:

ρ₀ K-cell/Universe density on its radiation radius r0c @PowerMaximum @T0, m0cK actual K-cell/universe constant mass (2008 values ~ 4.14 T53 KG);

K denotes actual doppler redshift constant average mean. See K in m0cK1 with links to the How of it (The K-radius).

h in VISIBLE AND TOTAL MASS.

SO IT FOLLOWS FROM THESE BASICS (SUNnowMASS in anoKEPLER):

Sun mass from SunDayOne:

deduced from (constants in The Constants)

calculus note: The result CANNOT BE DIRECTLY CALCULATED AS WRITTEN: the ten power instrument in OpenOffice needs a reorganization here: we must calculate as

r0c · h^—6 · u^—6 · nU^14 · u^14 .. = r0c · h^—6 · u^8 · nU^14 .. with nU = neutron instrumental epoch standard [HOP] atomic weight 1.0086652 atomic mass [u, Dalton] units.

with present results from The Result table on the Kepler Sun mass value 1.989661830 T30 KG giving the IAU 3.8275 Kepler spouse 3.827500021:

6.670000000000 t11 JM/(KG)² ........... G

1.544177740574 T26 M ...................... r_0c

1.989661830066 T30 KG .................... m_S

1.992722428080 T30 KG .................... m_Sbegin

4.161443971126 T53 KG .................... m_0cK

G gravitational constant, r0c K-cell/universe’s expansion radius on it maximum power time point (T0=16.3Gy), mS our anomalistic time periodKepler calculated Sun mass now, mSbegin Sun’s initial day one mass, m0cK our universe’s/K-cell actual constant mass (with its mass loss omitted during its bright time period 336Gy).

ITERATIONprocess: anoKEPLER

THE SUN PHOTOMETRIC TEST Oct2018 here revised in accounted detail

The CENTRAL ACCOUNTING DETAILS ¦ the iterations

— assuming familiarity with TNED BACKGROUND IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS (BinMap ):

The result appears by manual iteration

BELOW is the actual calculus card (OpenOffice, Swedish edition: KcellAnalys2018.ods, Tabell2).

— The actual cell parts are explained during/inside the iteration process from rVIZ (i) to a Pfme-value (k) with a verifying (j) Sun Mass Now as the iterative end check result. End results includes some accompanying data (Sun's original mass, the exact rVIZ radial distance). An exact calculating copy in Tabell3 gives the same process but with the COMPUTERIZED EPOCHS STANDARD (CES) values in comparing record.

— None of the iterations with CES touches the IAU value with tolerances — neither with the Sun prefix as the standard (1.98847) nor with the Kepler calculated 1.98966(1830).

50% reduced. Se 100% version.

Tabell2 as is: The chart describes the central cells with input and final output result. See original Tabell2 in EndTEST.

The result of the test is — as proved by the quantities themselves — an unequivocal confirmation of general TNED cosmological and nuclear physics.

— An additional flow chart illustration as below has extracted the actual cells, explaining how the detailed path of the mathematical formula in the iteration and calculating process proceeds to and appears in the end result.

50% reduced. Se 100% version.

Tabell2Navigation — as is: The chart describes the central cells extracted in detailed mathematic content, how these connect in the calculating flow — arriving at a final output end result station.

— If correctly apprehended: There is, by far, no corresponding POSSIBLE test in modern quarters: TNED cosmological and mathematical physics on The Deduction of The Atomic Nucleus (The NEUTRON SQUARE with resulting ATOMIC MASSES in modern academic comparisons: The DiffGRAPHS) — the fundamental form of gravitation — has no modern academic counterpart. The entire testing complex as such has no here known corresponding modern academic representation.

• The test was at first exclusive for TNED only, and at second exclusive for testing different epochs of standard values.

• ALL DETAILS WITH DEDUCTIONS AND THEIR REFERENCES ARE COLLECTED IN THE TNED-CHEOPS DOCUMENT

BEGINNING FROM COSMOLOGICAL END TEST.

ResTAB:

THE RESULT ¦ ITproc

Separately tabled (15Nov2021) RESULTS IN »COMPILED COMPARING MODE»:

———————————————————————————————————

ATTESTING THE ENTIRE TNED COSMOLOGICAL COMPLEX — IAU preference 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W: Sun’s photometric effect

The Kepler calculated mS = 1.989661830 T30 KG — returns exactly 1.98966 with a plus 14.515 S — with G = 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)²;

Instrumental epoch standard values — COMPILED separate table FROM results in Tabell2 in KcellAnalys2018.ods

Computerized epoch standard values — Tabell3 in KcellAnalys2018.ods — D48 and A45 must be replaced manually for exact time with manually inserted 365.256363 and 20.805

Only the instrumental epoch standard values accept the (Oct2018) Wikipedia (unknown origin except for actually referred numbers) SUNnow mass 1.98847 — lowest precision, diff: 0.000679744 — and the directly Kepler calculated SUNnow 1.988661830 value — highest precision, diff: 0.000000021 — with the IAU preference 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W (EndTEST): the actual instrument measured photometric effect of our Sun.

• In TNED it is a constant — from DayBegin to DayEnd (Hydrogen to Helium). In modern corridors it is not. So only a TNED test is possible, at all.

— A possible HINT for the origin of the WikipediaOct2018 1.98847 value (seemingly impossible to find the How source of) is: replace oldG with a newer G=6.674:

mS = 1.988469345 T30 KG = 4π²/G · R³/t² = 4*PI()^2*((365.2596425) * 3600*24)^-2*(1AU=1.4959787E+11)^3/(newG=6.674E-11), ~ 1.98847.

— It is truly obvious that modern corridors are in pain on trying to resolve the basic data. Compare TNED: excellent follow — on instrumental epoch standard.

— The IES to CES differing STANDARD VALUES include

G gravitational constant e electron charge h Planck constant k0 Stefan-Boltzmann constant u atomic mass unit me mn rn electron and neutron mass with neutron toroid nucleus gravity circle radius (TNED physics — not applicable in modern quarters: so it had to be adopted here in Tabell3 for comparing purposes).

WHAT DOES THE RESULT SUGGEST?

— If no rejective argument exists: The result obviously points out a clear and bright 100% verification of TNED cosmological nuclear mathematical physics — on the instrumental epoch standard values ONLY (Tabell2).

— It means that the present established standards

— and concepts in general of our universe, as so formulated and put through TNED

— are put under strong question, unless some arguments exist to clarify it is not.

• NOT in explicit that present ideas should be WRONG (as they obviously lead us here ..), but indeed that present established ideas of our universe are PRIMITIVE. Very primitive. (The conditions for universal understanding were better year 1311 ..).

• The CWON complete whole number version of Earth’s AtmosBiosLitos isotopic content and distribution — on the HONC elements hydrogen oxygen nitrogen and carbon — has presented AR123 a systematic EARTH MASS equality foundation;

• Along with

1. the now older instrumental epoch standard values, Tabell2 and an exposed (PrimDATA)

2. Earth based BioGAS BIOLOGICAL premise (water jH2O and vegetation S/c by defined masses and their mutual relations — also intimately connected to the IPCC AGW global complex) along with

3. TEN BioEK1-10 mutually communicating verifying quantities (TheTEN)

gives us results with a direct focus on a QUANTITATIVE connection between physics and biology — and that one came as a real surprise (TNED work during 2020. See all documents in BioEK1-10).

Such a result is in itself as far from present established ideas of SCIENCE as distance can fathom by itself, so to speak. And it just popped up (2020) as a result of gathering all the known 1900s geological crust, biosphere and atmospheric available data (from three independent encyclopedic sources, see PrimDATA). The internal max tolerance between the different data sources is on the order of ±1% by relation — mostly a better match than 99.50% with data from the actual available tables of isotopic distribution. The CWON solution (then — hence) suggests a reversed order — where geological data have a specified (certain) measuring uncertainty with respect to a generalized Earth crust geology — but that is on the other hand no easy proving Sunday Quest. The general TNED explaining answer is: resonances.

Any way: the CWON version certifies Earth mass 5.975 T24 KG (VNS) by water (jH2O) and vegetation (S c standing and cyclic) — on an unprecedented precision level of less that ±3 GRAM — IF the significants 5.975 shall stay put.

There is by far what we know no such possible tolerance level in any kind of instrumental measure: roughly 27 powers of ten.

— As the equivalents hold — Earth surface material composition and quantities versus a total Earth mass quantity — there is no quantitative argument in question. The general TNED explaining answer to The How is: resonances (as in the periodic system math deduction).

— Adding to this result the — here IAU tested (see the MathLIST) — underlined instrumental epoch standard G value of 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)² — the actual result of the whole presented IAU test based on the Kepler calculated SUNnow1.989661830 T30 KG mass — just adds another quantitative verification of TNED physics in general: the WAY Earth has passed or can so be understood its evolutionary history — up to us humans, today.

It puts especially the recent (2000+) new (electrically aided torsion oscillating) measures of G (6.674, 6.6743 ..) in focus with the question:

— Is the experimentalist’s insight into the used material and their physical nature sufficiently illuminated for a safe answer to the question whether ALL error sources have been eliminated — with a 100% certainty? No answer to that question is (yet) here known. IF an answer will arrive, perhaps an even higher resolution will arrive — too.

Principle »IAU test» of a relevant G tolerance:

• IF we use the IAU reference of the Sun’s photometric effect 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W on the Kepler calculated SUNnow mass 1.989661830 T30 KG that resulted in the very fine IAU match 3.827500021

THE RESULT ¦ IAU preference 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W: Sun’s photometric effect

Anomalistic orbit period

• ENCARTA99: 365.2596425d — Wikipedia: 365.2596360d ; Difference: 0.561599998582 S — we use Encarta here;

mS = 4π²/G · R³/t² = (2π/t)²R³/G = ω²R³/G returns

mS = 1.989661830 T30 KG. — exactly 1.98966 with plus 14.515 S — with G = 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)²

and STRESS the G value 6.67 to the IAU limits, we find a first (iterative, more demanding Tabell2 process with an) IAU-G significant tolerance of the form

6.67 ± 0.0012 ¦ The oldG school tolerance is specified ± 0.005

Passing this G significant limit violates — destroys — the IAU value.

It will in the end depend on what idea of our universe we will stress up some strife to defend — as the most explaining ..

— Exactly 6.67 by the Kepler calculated Sun mass matches the IAU preference 3.8275 as 3.827500021.. A direct hit.

Below we study the main culprits as these step forward in explaining — mathematically and physically — WHY Modern academy did end up last in this exercising class:

— There is absolutely nothing wrong with Intelligence in modern corridors. The inducement of using its content seems less familiar. See for yourself.

TEB: SHORT OVERVIEW OF TNED BASICS — it all started toward the end of the 1970s [ TNEDbegin ] .. really at the age of 15 with strong and dramatic interest in atomic physics literature .. [ 1900s first 30 years ]

— WITH DESCRIPTION OF THE IAU ITERATIVE TESTING COURSE

TNED-BASICS — K-cell Heat Physics

— WHAT MODERN ACADEMIC IDEA SHUT ITSELF OUT FROM UNDERSTANDING:

——————————————————————————————————————————

TNED-physics statements — we constantly try to break them down: with as yet only report of being stronger ..

——————————————————————————————————————————

WITHOUT A FUNDAMENTAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS (the neutron) the fundamental form of gravitation (The PlanckRing h=mcr in TNED physics)

MODERN ACADEMY HAS ALSO LOST SIGHT OF THE REST OF THE UNIVERSE

— consenting THEORETICAL INVENTIONS OF and in PHYSICS to compensate for understanding nothing of it.

SunEnergyMachine:

— Basic TNED star physics and mathematics ¦ Different basic theories ¦ Sun Period ¦ Compare TNED/MAC

MODERN ACADEMY: STARS form from gravitational contraction ending on collisional nuclear fusions inside the gas globe.

RELATED PHYSICS: STARS begin from neutron Dmax 1.87 T17 KG/M³, establishing a periodic fusion rate on a Central Anvil.

— Mechanics, electricity, magnetism and temperature physics are deduced and related in detail — checked by measured data.

Connections, deductions, comparisons — as far as possible — are collected by TNED physics and mathematics in STAR PHYSICS I and STAR PHYSICS II and THE PULSARS.

WHILE related physics — TNED — receives a detailed nuclear physics map of how stars work — in every itty bitty tiny piece of the art, as shown by the instrumentally measured data — the modern academic idea struggles with compensating theoretical inventions attempting to explain the phenomena — and of which few, if any, understand the content. Related physics is clean from such inventive consensus.

ESPECIALLY THE TEMPERATURE PHYSICS — the sole reason behind the IAU photometric test, as launched from the TNED point of view — receives THOROUGH attention in TNED star physics:

SUN4:

While modern academy knows only of one single heat degree complex (TPlanck)

— the commonly known normal Planck heat degree (TP) mathematical physics

— the nuclear complex of stars (Sun-Physics) shows there are three more (T, TW and Tγ).

Sun’s 4 heat degrees — only the Planck TP domain is known in modern academy

— The reason behind this large discrepancy of corresponding »established known connections» is — TNED:

— the Atomic Nucleus — Neutron h=mcr=Planck constant — deduction. What follows from that deduction — »a veritable resulting heavy rainfall, like Opening The Gates» mildly said — reveals details practically »formulating themselves» when analyzed. No big deal, really (given the Basic 7 principles of physics: 1APARC 2FUNTOP 3POM 4NEONS 5GRIP 6DEEP 7PASTOM, first formulated in TNED around 2002). And so, the one thing gives the other, making a total complex of (in some sense) actually »very simple and elementary physical equations — however sometimes extensive .. in structure ..» — as the above stated and deduced.

These given, we can start examining the results, and test them and check them with known instrumental measures, to see if we eventually »arrived @No1HomeHarbor». So (The Result):

— It is obvious, TNED says, that modern academic corridors experience some deep pain in attempting to understand the physics of our Sun — too. If the reader would have another opinion, it is high time to share it. This author would be the first to show an interest.

THESE FINDINGS — from TNED alone — LEAD TO A TIGHT DEFINITION OF The Sun's PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT

— in TNED star/Sun physics:

• Knowing a thorough value of our Sun's measured photometric effect — IAU standard Pfme = 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W — a rare opportunity for TNED has opened its door for a real check on the TNED complete cosmological star physics parametric equations — K-cell Heat Physics:

— ALL (MathLIST) the calculating connections and formula, all deduced in scrutiny detail with our Sun (SUNnowKepler) as a testing agent

— or not at all.

AVAILABLE TIME DATA:

EMAG ¦ anoKEPLER

T ¦ t → 10↑± :

THE TESTING COURSE

TNED TESTING METHOD:

• PREFIX: We use a — any available — established (or other) stated value for (a) Sun's mass (some general 1.989 T30 KG — with more precise significants).

SunMassNOW: ATD

THESE ARE OUR SUN MASS SOURCES:

mS = 1.98847 — (no related source found, just given numbers), .......... Wikipedia, Sun: Oct2018: ±0.000 07

mS = 1.9885 — (no related source found, just given numbers), .......... Wikipedia, Sun: 13Nov2021: no given tolerance

[The Note5WikipediaNov2021 referred NASA table gives “1,989,100” T24 KG: 1.9891 T30 KG]

— Several (many) places @internet refer to this value (by reference notes) with no information of The How of it.

A REMARKABLE RESOLUTION:

USING THE KEPLER AnomalisticSOLUTION TO OUR SUN MASS

RETURNS THE MOST (AMAZINGLY EXACT) PRECISION RESULT

CALCULATING the Sun mass directly from the Kepler connection ON THE ANOMALISTIC PERIOD (t)

• ENCARTA99: 365.2596425d — Wikipedia: 365.2596360d ; Difference: 0.561599998582 S — we use Encarta here;

mS = 4π²/G · R³/t² = (2π/t)²R³/G = ω²R³/G returns

mS = 1.989661830 T30 KG. — exactly 1.98966 with plus 14.515 S — with G = 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)² and a corresponding

mS = 1.988469345 T30 KG ~1.98847 with a newG = 6.674 t11 JM/(KG)² — which is the WikipediaOct2018 mS-value (nowNov2021 [again] changed to 1.9885) but which source (still2021 from noted 2018) seems impossible to find — except the actually stated/cited value: WE ARE APPROACHING THE DRAMATIC END OF THIS STORY, SOON ..

anoKepler solution as above mS = ω²R³/G with G=6.67 t11 JM/(KG)² [HOP¦A8], R=1AU=1.4959787 T11 M [BA1978s15],

t = 365.2596425d ENCARTA99 [Wikipedia: 365.2596360d Oct2018: difference is ½ second] anomalistic period RETURNS

mS = 1.989661830 T30 KG................................................................... Kepler solved Sun mass with G = 6.670

The iterative process

• We FORCE (i) an iterative TNED RECALCULATION of the entire K-cell parametric parts FROM START (“BigBang”) up till now

WITH PURPOSE TO FIND THAT Solar PREFIX (j) mass quantity NOW

AFTER HAVING SHUN FROM THE BEGINNING. We add — backwards — all mass losses known from present measured rates (solar wind plus regular mass loss from E=hf=mc² transfer), reaching a corresponding heavier Sun Begin Mass @20.82Ga.

— The recalculation must HENCE include the entire TNED K-cell Heat Physics universe's mathematical physical parametric complex, no compromising — beginning from The Beginning — FROM the (fast, K-cell Expansion) formation of our own galaxy Milky Way and its star, solar and planetary systems 20.82Ga. That includes

— How our K-cell — the universe — evolves in TNED cosmology

FAITH has transferred to certainty. Here — in TNED — nothing is believed: we KNOW, or NOT. Hold on. There will always come a new spring. Always. Some call it HOPE or FAITH. Some name it TRUTH — »eternal peace of mind».

• the rVIZ parameter (i): the actual or estimated visual optical signal limit radius of the universe (textbook value default around 1000 Mpc).

— TNED has detailed connections from there to all the other parametric parts (The Constants). And so

• we begin (i) from a rVIZ value, checking for its numerical adoption

• on arriving (j) at our PREFIX Sun mass (whatever it might be),

• then (k) taking the final TNED defined readout for the Pfme photometric effect:

— IF AT ALL it MUST connect to the measured IAU standard Pfme = 3.8275000 ± 0.0014 T26 W: min3.8261 max3.8289.

— How did TNED do, did it pass? You don't want to know: A direct Hit on the Bell — with the PREFIX as the Kepler calculated Solar mass 1.98966(1830) T30 KG — on the INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH STANDARD values (-1960-1999). The COMPUTERIZED EPOCH STANDARD values (2000+) does NOT hold. And neither does the standard (Wikipedia) Sun mass 1.98847 T30 KG. Only the Kepler calculated mass passes into the IAU test — and does so even gallantly: 3.8275001010. TNED physics only. There is no comparing agent.

The ResTAB compiles the actual central results.

— Only the anoKEPLER anomalistic Kepler calculated and (1.98847Oct2018) Wikipedia Sun mass values passes the TNED/IAU Sun photometric value 3.8275000±0.0014 T26 W test — BUT SO ONLY ON THE INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH STANDARD VALUES — with an unprecedented precision value hit by the Kepler present SUNnow1.989661830 T30 KG value; Difference: 0.000000021.

— It is (here) interpreted as — a most prominent direct hit. The result below belongs to the rough time parameters. See ResTAB for exakt values.

THE RESULT ¦ ITproc

The original from Oct2018:

OldG:

INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH STANDARD VALUES (IES [1960-1999] here adopted chronology based on different sources before 2000)

THE OLD SCHOOL G-VALUE:

G ¦ HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. CONDON, Second Edition,

©1958 1967 McGRAW-HILL BOOK COMPANY 12403 :

Appendix: Units and Conversion Factors p.A—8.

— Other noted sources in this production using the same value:

FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 p666: ”6,670 · 10^–11” JM/(KG)²

SYNTabell2: DESCRIPTION

Compiled synthesized overview of Tabell2:

Actual complete cell program in KcellenAnalys2018.ods, Tabell2.

SYNTabell2det: SYNTabell2

Compiled synthesized overview of Tabell2:

Actual complete cell program in KcellenAnalys2018.ods, Tabell2.

HOW THE SUN’S PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT (k) WAS TESTED IN TNED (Oct2018) from the given IAU value 3.8275000 ±0.0014 T26 W.

— All parameters and constants are accounted for in

BEGINNING FROM COSMOLOGICAL END TEST.

BinMap:

Also more apprehensive in TNED FROM START and 3D geometry basics

TNED BACKGROUND IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS

T ¦ t → 10↑± :

RELATED PHYSICS EXPLAINS MODERN ACADEMY

BASIC REASONS

BASIC REASONS WHY MODERN ACADEMY CANNOT KEEP UP WITH TNED — related physics and mathematics

CheopsRektangelV.htm#TNEDcosmos2021 ¦ MatematikenAnalys.htm#NOLLINTEGRALEN

FIRST:

SOMETHING never — ever — appears out of nothing: no exceptions: constants have no integrals: try to break this down: we can’t.

Euler Equivalents — Math ¦ Euler Equivalents — History ¦ THE QUANTITY INDEPENDENT ¦ Variants and Universals ¦ Elementary Interface’s Concept in Related Math ¦

General Classification of Homogeneous and Inhomogeneous Variants — conventional: differential equations with or without variable coefficients ¦ The Global Water Equation

SECOND:

GRIP and DEEP

LIGHT'S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY certifies Physic's 7 Principles on GRIP and DEEP — short form:

GRAVITATION — convergence principle:

• Equal for all matter — cannot be shielded from — independent of time; MECHANICAL PHYSICS (v)

LIGHT/ELECTRICITY — divergence principle — complete GRIP negation:

• Different for all matter — can be shielded from — dependent on time ; ELECTRICAL PHYSICS (c)

— natural constant divergence in vacuum c₀ = 2.99792458 T8 M/S.

AS A PROPERTY OF SPACE — AS GOVERNED BY THE LOCAL TIME-INDEPENDENT GRAVITATION — DIVERGENCE (c) BELONGS TO — or is extracted out from — EVERY POSSIBLE SPACE POINT ON AN absolute ACCELERATION

a = dv/dT = c/dT — LIGHT'S ABSOLUTE STATE OF ACCELERATION IN EACH LOCAL xyz POINT OF SPACE

— SO THAT

DIVERGENCE (c) DOES NOT CONNECT TO KINETICS (v) — c and v are not additive — if such ideas are adopted, they lead to grave errors and mistakes in understanding the fundamentals of physics — THAT IS light physics' liberty clause in TNED (proven from 1881 by the historically dramatic Michelson and Morley interferometer experiments — however interpreted otherwise in MAC)

MEANING: so that we separate the concepts

:

light's divergence — the state — in space point ds, from light's SPEED: average (divergence) over a fix interval

WITH AN EXPLICIT SIMPLE DERIVATION OF THE PLANCK ENERGY CONNECTION AS: divergence energy

E = hf = mcr · f = mcr/T = mc · c = mc² (light and heat)

WITH A CORRESPONDING LIGHT'S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY — on the only available mathematical connective domain:

EXPLICITLY BY DEDUCTION

CHEOPS RECTANGLE — bd=h²

WITH SEVERAL OTHER POWERFUL CONNECTIONS (complex algebra, and others, here assumed familiarity ..) IN MATHEMATICS. — IN A COMPILED EXPLANATION OF all presently known theoretical and practical COSMOLOGICAL PHYSICS

it The LIGHT'S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY

STATES:

Fig:1: TNED has additional extended STATIC and EXPANSIVE/Contractive g-math (no such mentioned in modern corridors) necessary top complete the description of the K-cell Heat mathematical Physics.

EndSTATION: BinMAP

AND — so in explicit — WITH AN ACCOMPANYING Q — deducing the electric charge (Q):

THE ACTUAL END STATION: Q

From this follows

(explicity with the helt of the Potential Barriere further from Q)

THE DEDUCTION OF THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS

— the fundamental form of gravitation as The Planck Ring h=mcr — the neutron and further (The Neutron Square with The Atomic Masses — in concord with experimentally measured quantities — COMPARISON)

THE FUNDAMENTAL FORM OF GRAVITATION

principle structure of mass — 7th principle of physics (PASTOM):

THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS ”GRAVITONS”— never was, never will be.

— Modern academy — provably in to the last atom — is living in a 1800+ self made cocoon, woven up from misconceptions and logical inventions on the idea that universe is a meaningless trap of utter nonsense. So does the use of general intelligence mirror the master’s idea.

GRAVITATION IS A TIMELESS STATE OF CONDITIONS ONLY DETERMINED AND RULED BY MECHANICS: instrumentation.

ALONG WITH THE PERIODIC SYSTEM (Kepler Resonances),

Resonances build matter: atoms and their surrounding electron masses. As deduced from the Planck constant in TNED — the neutron h = mcr — there is also IN TNED an accompanying nuclear resonant spouse: the source; The Planck (fractal) Structure Constant (Physics 7 Principles No7: PASTOM: principle principal structure of mass: certifying a possible E=hf=mc²: the atomic nucleus has no particular constituents — although as in water drops it appears so, see Basic Natural Illustration).

— The Heisenberg uncertainty constant IMPLIES STRUCTURE to end on the level of »the nuclear shell». It doesn’t. The simple mathematical equivalent — by substitution — E = hf = (h/n) × (nf) certifies that internal (nuclear/neutrino fractal) energy approaches zero as the frequency — the Planck fractal — approaches infinity. This is clear from the deduction of the atomic nucleus from The Planck Ring (h=mcr), or the fundamental form for gravitation (gravitation’s clarifying part: PlanckRing2): the atomic nucleus.

— See also The Neutron Fragments — how SPIN makes it.

SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS, and THE ELECTRON'S BUBBLE CHAMBER TRACKS — with further (Neutrino physics)

INCLUDING THE PLACK EQUIVALENTS

— WITH A DIRECT PRACTICAL EXAMPLE IN The GPS EXAMPLE

THE ENTIRE EINSTEIN'S THEORY OF RELATIVITY BECOMES SURPASSED TO ITS RIGHTFUL PHYSICAL MUSEUM.

— IT was never intended to describe reality. Merely it was intended to serve a specific convenient mathematical idea of INTELLIGENCE caring more for its own tower than the actual natural process of thinking. Natural history always tell one and the same fate for that type:

Bottom line:

— SCIENCE is for verification. Nor for invention. Nature is to be understood. Not dictated or prompted at.

— CONSENSUS is no scientific subject.

COMPARE THE RESULTS — The LIST

COMPARE RELATED PHYSICS mathematics versus Einsteins expressions in the EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATIONS:

ABERRATION (Bradley 1725 — Light's gravitational dependency):

SOLAR PATH DEFLECTIONS FROM 1919:

EXPERIMENTAL MASS INCREASE ON ACCELERATED ELECTRONS FROM ELECTRIC VOLTAGE:

No mass is created, no mass is destroyed — only one of the agents in action has been measured (thread-ray-tube):

The phenomena has no connection to mechanics — and no such experiment has neither been performed.

— INDUCTION AND MAGNETISM IN MODERN ACADEMY IS HIGHLY INFECTED BY INVENTIVE THEORY.

THAT, TNED says, IS THE ONLY REASON WHY MODERN ACADEMY CANNOT KEEP UP WITH NATURE — BUT CONSTANTLY MUST INVENT NEW LOGIC WHEN NATURE TRIES TO HEAL THE WOUND.

THE ACTUAL MODERN ACADEMIC vic-ERROR — why Einstein's theory fails in physics: we deduce Einsteis equations in special relativity:

PROVING MULTIPLE LIGHT SPEED FROM COSMIC PARTICLE RADIATION EXPERIMENTS

exactly same math, same result — completely different interpretations — with TNED's simple cosmological explanation:

there is no time dilatation — there are no relativistic time properties in existence.

THE GPS EXAMPLE (as already proven and mentioned/illustrated earlier above).

THE EXPANSION OF THE UNIVERSE (in specific concern of the TNED's K-cell Heat Physics: different Doppler aspects: linear/not linear):

THE ELECTRIC DISPLACEMENT — THE PLANET MERCURY ORBIT — the perihelion rotation of the planets:

This result (time difference) is also valid for perfectly circular orbits — but Einstein’s theory excludes these.

THE CGRO/GRB GAMMA RAY BURST OBJECTS — lightning up the universe, several documents with details:

Including Related Mathematics Gravitational Redshift — explaining modern corridor's “dark energy”.

— Modern academy 1800+ is full of invented misconceptions of the physical nature of Nature.

THE FIZEAU EXPERIMENT — light's velocity through streaming water:

WITH FURTHER:

— There should be no exception — explaining all physical phenomena in a rational, fully understandable logical meaning — says TNED , based on perfectly explainable mathematics in detail down to bare atom:

— Find one.

THE ENERGY BALANCE

• Light physics does not connect to kinetics:

— traces of light around gravitational bodies show no centrifugal aspect:

— light is a massless physical phenomena and cannot be calculated directly along with mechanics.

In TNED cosmology »The General Conditions Law» explains the entire cosmic energy equative balance so — based on THE ENERGY LAW:

The only energy balancing mathematical way to explain the cosmic existence in terms — on logical rational details:

— »This Shop is always Open; We never — ever — close». Extracted »Wall Street idealism».

NO KNOWN RATIONAL, LOGICAL OR OTHER COGITATING METHOD EXISTS BY WHICH TO UNDERSTAND A FUNDAMENTAL CREATION OF ENERGY — MATTER, the neutron, Planck constant h=mcr — AS HOWEVER ENERGY FROM MASS IS TRANSFORMED AS LIGHT AND HEAT THROUGH :NUCLEAR (STARS) FUSIONS:

• the IDEA of mass as a physical concept cannot be given a fundamental logical or rational beginning — only a (partial) transformation from mass to light and heat (electricity);

• the idea of a fundamental »LIMITED COSMIC AMOUNT OF MASS» lies beyond rational and logic apprehension.

— If the reader has a solution yielding something opposite, please share.

• As however gravitation sets limits for light's divergence capacity — local speed of light = 0 if enveloping enough matter — a central cosmic CELL — in TNED the K-cell — collects a physical active electro-mechanical limited sphere of mass (m0cK).

• But its TNED RELATED properties — GRAVITATION no Einsteins relativity — lie completely outside modern corridors: “dark energy” in modern quarters is explained by Gravitational redshift in TNED — exactly the same net mathematical result should apply because the instrumental measure uses optics/electromagnetic physics: gravitation explains it, and proves it. Not motion: no extra tug.

— But with these relatively simple answers, modern academy cosmology crashes and goes museum.

• EINSTEINS THEORY OF RELATIVITY is already in museum in TNED (the vic-error):

• ALL PHYSICS ON A COSMIC AND ATOMIC NUCLEAR LEVEL is governed by PLANCK EQUIVALENTS:

— same structure as Einsteins equations — if applicable at all — but on vastly different physical foundations.

CHEOPS ATLAS SERIES: ¦ Previous Chart

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 111 .. 333 .. ¦ ATLANTIS ¦ GTursprunget2019 ¦ AtlantisAPPENDIX ¦ TNED

CheopsATLAS	CheopsATLAS TNED	CheopsATLAS Glaciation	CheopsATLAS Pyramids
CheopsATLAS MATH GOLDEN SECTION IN Petrie 1883 Cheops Pyramid	CheopsATLAS TNED PETRIE breaks the ICE EXPLAINING DETAILS With History: TNED to Petrie	CheopsATLAS Glaciation GLACIATION Testing A GEOLOGICAL explanation	CheopsATLAS Pyramids ARCHITECTURE WHY would satanists build PYRAMIDS? Idea Origin — EXAMPLES in/of precision

MATHEMATICS FROM THE BEGINNING

WHAT NATURAL SCIENCE IS BASED ON:

physics FROM THE BEGINNING

WHAT NATURAL SCIENCE IS BASED ON:

SPREAD SHEET DETAILS:

SPREAD SHEET DETAILS

all calculated quantities are accounted for in a linked open Swedish version of OpenOffice Calculus

IT IS NOT KNOWN HERE

IF THE OpenOfficeCalculus OPENING PROCESS WILL FUNCTION

IF THE USER HAS AN ENGLISH VERSION:

THE COMPLETE UNIVERSE HISTORY WORK WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED ONLY FOR A SWEDISH EDITION

WITH CONTAINED OPEN EDITABLE SPREAD SHEET TABLE DETAILS

FOR A GLOBALLY FREE AND OPEN

INSPECTION OF ALL CALCULATED RESULTS.

Zero mess.

Faulty statements are not allowed in this type of work.

CalCARDS: Kalkylkorten till CheopsATLAS — SPREAD SHEET DETAILS

Kalkylkorten CHEOPS ATLAS Jan-Mar2020

The calculus card below DIRECTLY FROM THIS WEB BROWSER CheopsATLAS2020.ods — see opening manual in Swedish only unless already familiar — or copy the URL below [whichever works — provided THE SWEDISH VERSION of the free program OPEN OFFICE is installed on the computer].

CheopsATLAS2020.ods

kalkylkorten nedan DIREKT FRÅN DEN HÄR WEBBLÄSAREN CheopsATLAS2020.ods — se öppningsmanual om ej redan bekant — eller kopiera URL:en nedan till valfri webbläsare (vilket som fungerar — förutsatt att SVENSKA VERSIONEN av gratisprogramvaran OPEN OFFICE finns installerad på datorn)

http://www.universumshistoria.se/AaKort/CheopsATLAS2020.ods

TABS:

NOTE: All Calculus Tables in UniverseHistory are given as OPEN documents, freely editable if anyone so wishes.

— But certain web browsers does not respect this copyright feature: the document opens in a locked read only mode.

Tabell1 — Table1

Contains two Tables of Comparing RECURRING CONSTANTS

in the general calculated results on and in Cheops Pyramid.

Tabell2 — user free

Tabell3 — user free

Tabell4 — Table4

All calculated quantities in CheopsATLAS.

— THE CalCARD parts were randomly inserted as the work proceeded — without any effort at all to organize the parts afterwards — EXCEPT on given terms. The only way to navigate and find the calculating specifics on a specific term (for example yBlimit, Pangle, Hangle ..) is to use the internal search (Ctrl+F). In any case: all calculated details in CheopsATLAS are covered.

— In explicit: Table 4 contains the central PHASE 1 TABLE

connected to the rJCIRCLE complex rJCR¦b16 Pyramid Agent

for The 7 Fundamental Points:

The lower end-parts in Table4 contain the specific tables on the King and Queen chamber Petrie comparing details — with some extracted data from Petrie’s specified Gallery walls’ GROOVE parts.

Tabell5 — Table5

PHASE 1 TABLE as above but connected to the PetrieCR¦b58 Pyramid Agent:

— Table5 is internally connected to Table 4

(code in Table5 to fetch corresponding Table 4 data: .. Table5.A4 ..)

for specific relational comparing values in specified parts.

WorldReportMar2020: WorldHealth2020

ADDITIONAL 2021: ¦ Testing the Earth mass through the CHEOPS TEST ¦

The results in BioEK1-10 with CAP and CWON version — Earth’s AtmosBiosLitos isotopic content — have put a more focus on the rJ-circle proof in the Cheops Rectangle complex — see also MATH LIST above.

SHORT SUMMATION Mar2020

SWEDEN 2020: ONCE a seemingly forbiddingly beautiful LAND. Now: A depressing thousands of kilometers depressing — did I forget to mention DEPRESSING — travel of continued expanding nature sight killing vandalisation.

SHORTER SUMMATION 2021:

— »Virus» ?

— »Today we feast on our fingers, and tomorrow we have a party on our legs», United Nations health care?

— »We have great understanding of Nature». Medicine. Vaccine. Tell me I’m wrong. Say it.

SHORT SUMMATION (2020) — The CHEOPS complex only

• ONLY the rJCIRCLE complex will give us a LEAD to the whole Pyramid Cheops Building Edifice Enigma — Through Petrie's noted “descending passage 19th floor thickness trigonometric/optic projection principle” (TCA), The Contracted Construct:

• The rJCIRCLE enveloping the Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid — though the Pyramid Agent rJCR¦b16 — represents a slightly (27.58'') higher Pyramid, same form with same original casing top. However so situated (27.58'') BELOW the Petrie measured Platform Based Cheops Pyramid PetrieCR¦b58: both these share the same Pyramid top and casing — exactly;

• All basic quantities rely on the rJCR¦b16, as deduced. And so HENCE IRREVOCABLY making it — absolutely, totally — impossible for anyone to deduce the PLAN — unless so initiated and familiar with the rJCIRCLE basics. Meaning: TNED. Nuclear NATURALLY DEDUCED IN RELATED DETAIL physics; The mathematical connection defining the rJCIRCLE quantity: all from the simple Cheops Rectangle connection bd=h² explaining

Square Roots, Whole Triangle Numbers, Complex Numbers and Algebra ¦

Light’s Gravitational Dependency → TNED — all so by deduction unknown in modern 1800+ academic quarters;

ALL ABOUT WHAT THE ENTIRE COMPLEX IS FOUNDED ON.

• So HOW would we suggest familiar on these backgrounds without further proof, HOW the engineers behind this building complex DID reason by their time? Try this one:

• HUMANITY WILL FALL into cultures of delusion and violence. The NATURAL knowledge we know will be forgotten, impossible to regain UNLESS through times and eras where a collection of SERIOUS humans will begin to contribute with basic mathematical and physical principal revelations on Natural Knowledge: Our Kepler, Galileo, Newton, Bradley, Euler, Planck and all their associated. So:

• WE familiar with high tech environmental harmonizing free energy in enormous amounts BUILD MONUMENTAL PYRAMIDS fucking A huge stone block Monuments with millions of truck heavy blocks realized See ASSEMBLY by our computer controlled machinery ON THE CENTRAL MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICAL CONNECTION (here coined) CHEOPS RECTANGLE EXPLAINING ALL THE DETAILS BEHIND THE DEDUCTION OF THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS THROUGH LIGHT'S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCY AND FURTHER — impossible for later cultures to remove or undo until so duly understood; Sooner or later someone enough motivated and interested will DIG out the clues and the answers, regaining our Natural Knowledge IN HARMONY WITH NATURE: all humanity, technology and nature together.

• WE INTEGRATE THE CONSTRUCT AS SO ADVISED THROUGH THE GOLDEN SECTION PARAGON INTEGRATED MATHEMATICAL GEOMETRY, BASED ON THE rJCIRCLE principal enveloping connection — guaranteeing that nobody — ever — will understand that PLAN until so revealed in its full content.

— Every the smallest piece of critique is highly welcome here — constantly searching for it — to debunk this forward put main suggestion: initially CONSIDERABLY HIGHER Planetary Established Human IQ than NOW (Mar2020).

WORLD HEALTH 2020: 29Mar2020

ADDITIONAL 2021:

During the whole year 2021 several contributions arrived to clarify the picture, further.

———————————————————————————————————

ADDITIONAL 2021: ¦ Testing the Earth mass through the CHEOPS TEST ¦

The results in BioEK1-10 with CAP and CWON version — Earth’s AtmosBiosLitos isotopic content — have put a more focus on the rJ¦CIRCLE proof in the Cheops Rectangle complex

Further Extended Swedish Deforestation 2021has thrown a stronger light upon the possible biological consequences — together :with other planet Earth instances who continue turning their back on human rights: The Marker and The VIRUS.

— The human ability to respond to an open rape.

HUMANITY IS UNDER ATTACK.

— »Virus» ?

No response?

3 BILLION YEARS TO MAKE HUMANS — WHO REDUCED FORESTS WITH MORE THAN 30% WITHIN 200 YEARS 1800+ [Source: Global Deforestation 2012]:

Special about CORONA PANDEMIC 28Mar2020

ILLUMINATED specifically ONLY HERE IN UNIVERSE HISTORY — from The Mauna Loa Proof → DEFORESTATION GRAPH 1800+:

Clearly exponential CO2 increase from beginning of 1960 — but the proof is banned because it kills the established forestry industry:

NATURAL PROVISION FOR A 100% HEALTHY GLOBAL BIOLOGICAL METABOLISM:

C¹²+O¹⁶ O¹⁸

TODAY (1962+) — to be corrected if faulty:

C¹²+O¹⁶ O¹⁸

(MEDICAL/physical/chemical) EXPLANATION:

OxygenQuest: See also short here in THE OXYGEN QUEST.

TABLE FROM OUR SWEDISH EDITION OF A COLLECTED HONC ELEMENT BASIC DATA SURVEY — The Chemical SIMILARITIES BETWEEN CHLOROPHYLL AND our beloved AMINO ACIDS.

— What exactly are you trying to share here, strictly medically?

— A resemblance LIKE scratching the skin for profit not caring for infections CAUSED BY SUCH UNNATURAL BEHAVIOR: The land biomass carbon-oxygen recycling process where untouched forests and vegetation did provide the foundation for human life during 3 billion years — suddenly 1800+ subject to industrial looting: state administrative irresponsible madness. Frankly: human sacrifice for profit.

3 BILLION YEARS TO MAKE HUMANS

— WHO REDUCED THOSE EVOLVING RESPONSIBLE FORESTS WITH MORE THAN 30% WITHIN 200 YEARS 1800+

(Source: Global Deforestation 2012): Say something intelligible.

Mid Sweden Right — 21Mars 2020: AS IF COMMANDED OVER HUGE AREAS a deforestation enterprise has entered some super surge exploding happening in Sweden — more close than ever to urbanized areas.

A RECKLESS PANDEMIC OF FOREST BALD CUTS SWEEPS OVER SWEDEN AS OBSERVED OVER THOUSANDS OF KILOMETERS ROAD 2017+ — NOW MARS 2020 SEEMINGLY WORSE THAN EVER.

And you, deeply Educated High Class Academy A student PhD State Administrative Organization didn’t count on that: Nature WILL respond?

— »Universe got Soul first with us: we are the emperors».

— Do you even BREATH oxygen: who are you?

— Please share your medical insights.

Test this one — or just show us this: YOU ARE WRONG IN THESE STRONG STATEMENTS.

Already from 1954:

Vegetation life

— the FOREST LAND BIOMASS life essential amino acid production for animals and humans

— metabolizes O16 at a higher rate than O18.

Dole1965: Dole, Lane, Rudd, and Zaukelies 1954:

Dole1965p16e.

PLANT FABRICATION OF AMINO ACIDS PREFER THE LIGHTER OXYGEN 16 — MEANING IT IS ALSO HIJACKED ON WILD FIRES AS WELL AS FOREST BALD CUTS IN THE EMINENT FORM OF

ATMOSPHERIC LAND BIOMASS MARKED CARBON DIOXIDE guaranteeing to also return back to the ground for regrowth:

— IF NOT ALLOWED TO RETURN, it stays put until. See The Deforestation Graph according to the MaunaLoaProof:

— 37% of the total accumulated extra CO2 from around 1800, as of year 2015, consists of SUCH carbon dioxide — and growing with continued forest industry.

Dole1965p18e.

IT IS ASSUMED HERE WITHOUT FURTHER PROOF THAT THIS VEGETATION O16 PREFERENCE ACCOUNTS FOR ALL VEGETATED BIOCHEMICAL PROCESSES, AT SEA AS WELL AS ON LAND:

— Earth’s biosphere has a closed carbon-oxygen recycling pressure-temperature biochemically governed system specifically for sea (non hydrostatic) and land (hydrostatic) essentially separated from the rest of the (higher) atmosphere. Any more profound disturbance or breach in that system, reflects upon each individual living being:

— Cell metabolism deviates by developing unique abnormal biochemical compounds proportional to impact.

— Stupid enough humans aspire to invent specific molecular chemistry to fight this nature, with only result that the impact deepens — instead of understanding the cure: bad natural attitude. Please do share your insights.

MID SWEDEN Mar2020: IT APPEARS AS A NEW ENTERPRISE — BASED ON DIRECT LOOTING AND SACKING:

THE ANIMALS THAT ONCE LIVED HERE: HAVE THEIR EXISTENTIAL RIGHTS BEEN REVOKED? Killed overrun wildlife all over the roads in a seemingly never ending increasing amount. Sweden 2020: cause:

NATURE FOREST OXYGEN FABRICATION IS RECKLESSLY BEING SUFFOCATED — murdered — BY THE SWEDISH STATE Highly Medically Educated ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITIES — 22 Mars 2020.

COMBINED RESULTS with THE MAUNA LOA PROOF:

• Earth’s Atmosphere WITH ITS O18 content is HUGE compared to The tiny Forest Field Closed Carbon12-Oxygen16 recycling already 3 billion year established vegetation amino acid metabolism.

• So: State Administrations beginning around year 1800: Removing any essential already 3 billion years established Forest Field Closed Carbon12-Oxygen16 recycling vegetation amino acid metabolism consequently also reduces the proportionality: life conditions attacked. Debunk this (irrevocably resulting) picture:

• THE EFFECT IS A WEAKENED VEGETATION BIOCHEMICAL AMINO ACID FABRICATION PROCESS. Result:

• More vulnerability from attacking disease depending on unnatural behavior (futile food consumption exaggerates individual exposure to a health attacking virus):

• STATE ADMINISTRATIONS CREATE DISEASE FROM INABILITY TO LIVE in NATURE, PERSISTENCE TO LIVE on NATURE:

• STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PARASITIC PANDEMIC BEHAVIOR: Established Academic Human Stupidity Creates (a) Pandemic.

• Tell me this is all WRONG, if you can: liberate humanity from all their pain.

A central QUOTATION FROM PRESENT ESTABLISHED SOURCES

(partially confirming the aboved sketched picture):

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CORONAVIRUS AND FLU, 13Feb2020 (30Mar2020)

http://www.differencebetween.net/science/health/difference-between-coronavirus-and-flu/

:

" What is Coronavirus (nCoV)?

Coronaviruses – that gets its name from ‘crown’ of sugary-proteins

were first time reported and identified in the 1960s.

But it is still unknown where did this virus come from.

In many cases, a coronavirus (CoV) can infect both humans and animals.",

“.. identified in the 1960s.”.

— So has the exponential rise in atmospheric Mauna Loa measured CO2 been — proving IT is generated by increasing deforestation. Not fossil combustion. But the proof in all this THE MAUNA LOA PROOF is attacking an already well infected modern academic state administrative forestry profit, responding with an aspiration to reject all opposition as non existent. It is a fight going on.

SUMMING:

Vegetation life

— FOREST LAND BIOMASS life essential amino acid production for animals and humans

— metabolizes O16 at a higher rate than O18.

— The reduced forest AS AFTER A VAST WILD FIRE lies dumped in the atmosphere:

land biomass dumped life supporting carbon dioxide O16 hijacked material

PROMOTING CELL METABOLISM TO CREATE/FORM/MORPHOLOGIZE NEW TYPES OF VIRUS

— Do correct if wrong[‡]: faulty statements are not allowed in a Universe History.

Forest Bald Cuts have reduced >30% of forests 1800-2000:

— Our 3 billion years evolved oxygen hijacked: 30%. Not 3. 30. One third. Wake up World.

Cure?

Cure?

— Put profit aside: Begin to COOPERATE WITH NATURE on a global scale.

Our planet is still Round.

And we are still Here. Sort of.

Say it:

— We refuse to establish ANY enterprise obviously in conflict with Nature Basics:

— As long as we don't know, we REFUSE.

Zero hazard.

100% cooperation.

Human rights:

LIFE.

— Decisions, any claim or statement, any idea, opinion or association

outside recognition of the inherent dignity

(P1 UDHR10Dec1948)

DEFINES OPPRESSION:

Opinion is still for free — but has always a corresponding consequence: argumentation on LIFE'S conditions: gravitation and electricity. Human rights.

Humans have no authority over these. But act these days as IF.

Suggestions in any parliament NOT concordant, is refuted directly.

Zero hazard.

Perfect Assembly.

Let the Natural Forests Return. They are dying to it.

THE OXYGEN QUEST: 31Mar2020

ADDITIONAL 2021:

During the whole year 2021 several contributions arrived to clarify the picture, further.

———————————————————————————————————

ADDITIONAL 2021: ¦ Testing the Earth mass through the CHEOPS TEST ¦

The results in BioEK1-10 with CAP and CWON version — Earth’s AtmosBiosLitos isotopic content — have put a more focus on the rJ¦CIRCLE proof in the Cheops Rectangle complex

Further Extended Swedish Deforestation 2021has thrown a stronger light upon the possible biological consequences — together :with other planet Earth instances who continue turning their back on human rights: The Marker and The VIRUS.

— The human ability to respond to an open rape.

HUMANITY IS UNDER ATTACK.

With a last 1812 seen 100% Nature Forest preserved — our preindustrial (ForestWORLD2012) preference

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

A ROUGH CALCULATION (OxygenFILTER) EXPOSES THAT THE FLATTENED AREA OF UP TAKING SOLAR ENERGY THROUGH LEAF&NEEDLE covers (at least: BIOSURFACE) 8 whole flat Earth sphere areas — last seen year 1812: MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2:

———————————————

Dole1965

1800-2000 more than 30% is removed

Photosynthesis agents Leaf&Needle did make us and all other life on Earth: solar energy uptake 100%.

— Chlorophyll, starch, cellulose, amino acids, proteins, DNA-regulating agents.

PERIOD 1800-2000 (ForestWORLD2012) more than 30% of the preindustrial forest area was removed:

SO — Sweden/IPCC/UN+:

— Where is the replacement — for a continued life health?

— Please share.

HUMANITY IS UNDER ATTACK.

Short summation from the original Swedish edition

THE OXYGEN QUEST ¦ SyVaBio settled 2021 by proof in BioGAS $ — and Earth mass mJ:

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

In SHORT BY RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS

— UN/IPCC/Sweden+: there is (no longer) any way you can TALK yourself out of this. The Train has stopped.

The ICE ¦ a primary 47 KM thick liquid oxygen cover around the Earth’s sphere: present jH2O water content 2.8 T22 KG in/on the lithosphere

31Mar2020. THE OXYGEN QUEST connects, and explains, the whole cosmological complex: Earth's geological history, its How and Why.

— Modern academic PhD:s preach that we and animals breath oxygen from the Earth's huge atmospheric sea of oxygen

O16(99,75%), O17(0,04%) and O18(0,2%)

(Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia Ed.5 1976, p495-501,

Table 3 THE NUCLIDES [ISOTOPES AND ISOBARS]).

— It doesn't work that way, says THE MAUNA LOA PROOF.

— We breath that oxygen which is continuously fabricated — recycled, regained — through our land biomass vegetation's hydrostatic (hydrostatic pressure based) phloem xylem machinery chlorophyll photosynthesis. Any reduction in that oxygen fabrication — deforestation in any significant amount = corresponding veg oxygen reduction — most certainly will reflect upon each and every individual land living creature; Do correct if wrong: It is all deducible from the Mauna Loa Proof: There IS a Natural Forest providing a Natural Biological Medical World Health — corrupted, severely reduced and vandalized by technically ignorant humans 1800+, very much claiming the opposite, with Nobel prises as the most prominent advertising global phenomena.

— Nothing is wrong with the experiments: experimental physics IS the only way to prove natural science;

— THE CHEMICAL RANKS (Ex3) set up in the photosynthesis experiments most certainly reflect the observed atomic and molecular processes, no doubt. Perfect performance. Absolutely.

— The Problem is (Experimental limitations) that the experimental equipment does NOT reflect (Mauna Loa Proof) the true relatable nature of the vegetated individual cell: it is PROMPTED to react in a favored way, until so submitted: attacked by the equipment: locked in a cage: expected to amuse the audience: locked out from Nature. Nobel prised. Do correct if wrong. All details in our Swedish edition SYREFRÅGAN (DIAKVADRATEN).

Modern academy PhD:s believe, and promote worldwide, that the Earth's oxygen atmosphere has been CREATED — synthesized — by plant photosynthesis (“plants make oxygen from water”) during Earth's early history. Related physics has another standpoint:

— Beginning from an initial HOT state (how planets an stars are formed: K-cell Heat Physics [Related »Big Bang stuff»]), oxygen becomes released first through a delicate planetary atmospheric process with heat and pressure: first when the higher Earth's atmosphere releases Hydrogen (from solar irradiation; the beginning of The Ozone Shield), free Oxygen is possible to show up, not before. But that will only be possible when the atmosphere's water vapor reaches a temperature below (CCS) 650°K: the first physically possible occasion when water first appear on Earth's surface (Also the beginning of The Moon Recession Process). By that same crucial process, the other (free) atmospheric (HONC) gases are released from their (hot) initial mix: Ammonia, Methane, Water, Carbon dioxide (CO2): Hydrogen (H), Nitrogen (N), Oxygen (O) and a thin layer of biospherical organic life supporting C+O2. Fast forward IN RELATED PHYSICS:

— Plants takes HCO and releases O2: water is never — ever — dissolved by plants:

C + O .. → CO2 .. → C + O .. in an endless recycling process where water (H2O, the electrolyte) catalyzes the electrolysis process through (Mauna Loa Summer Decrease) carbonized molecular agents (MLBok — carbon dioxide, bicarbonate, carbonate): water is never dissolved. No mother god loving way.

The relatable history of the early Earth and its atmosphere exposes a quite different, more detailed, story than our present established modern provably human invented famous 1800+ academic idea: Where universal intelligence resides. In Nature. Not in modern academy.

The modern academic cosmological aim exposes a most fallacious idea of natural physics with only one provable foundation: to secure modern academic ideas that modern academy is the foremost instance of intelligence in our universe. The best way to find out: Live. Don't die. Just watch and see.

RÉSUMÉ: 31Mar2020

ADDITIONAL 2021:

During the whole year 2021 several contributions arrived to clarify the picture, further.

— New focus has been cast on The CHEOPS Test.

————————————————————————————————————

Genombrott Jan2020 — Petries samtliga Cheopsdata enligt rJCIRKELN — på Engelska i Resumé — en fortsättning från CHEOPS REKTANGEL NOV2017

The Breakthrough Jan2020 — Petrie's complete Cheops data from the rJCIRCLE complex:

CHEOPS RECTANGLE RÉSUMÉ ¦ TheCHEOPStest

CHEOPS RECTANGLE Nov2017 was our first (HowStart) real steel breakthrough: The simple but decisive observation of the rJCIRCLE connection to the physical metrics — as described by the 1883 Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid measuring group[‡] (1881-1883). Namely the mathematical rJCIRCLE quantity as obviously defined by TNED physics: Our earlier (1993+) deduced atomic nucleus The Planck Ring Neutron N3m20 definition: The ideal Earth sphere radius on its present mass by the N3m20 atomic nuclear density. It lies guaranteed out of range in modern nuclear theory quarters (See Illustrated comparing foundations).

CHEOPS RECTANGLE Nov2017 exposes the more qualitative foundational GOLDEN SECTION paragon structural side of Cheops Pyramid's inner design with no doubt accurate quantitative parallels. However, in CHEOPS RECTANGLE Nov2017 a general quantitative account for the whole Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid building was never presented — because we never took the real steel advantage of the rJCIRCLE pyramid agency complex. What was the kink?

Petrie himself is responsible for that breakthrough, in our reference. Namely his (bright) observation of the trigonometric/optic projective connection (TCA ¦ ENTER ¦ MainConstruct ¦ Proving the 19th) between the Pyramid's 19th course thickness at the level of the entrance, and the descending passage FROM SEVERAL OTHER PYRAMIDS TOO (AsQuoted in PetrieCH6.31-32 Row12). The whole key to a regular PLAN for the whole building and its inner proportions is lying there — by exact mathematical quantity ONLY FROM A GIVEN rJCIRCLE PYRAMID MAIN AGENT. When we began consulting these properties by our two pyramid agents — PetrieCR¦b58 (Petrie's Cheops Pyramid measures within Petrie's own stated tolerances) and rJCR¦b16, using spread sheet calculus tables (our CalCARDS) for comparison and analysis — the dam broke and flooded all its content over us: Perfect Assembly. Flinders Petrie 1883.

Summing the impressions

Nuclear physics — the rJCIRCLE complex defining the Petrie 1883 measured Great Cheops Pyramid at Giza outside Cairo in Egypt — definitely lies beyond modern academic Egyptology.

FURTHER CONNECTING ARTICLES on the Cheops Pyramid subject Jan2020+ complete the picture in these separate Cheops Rectangle continuing articles:

CheopsATLAS-Begin ¦ CheopsATLAS-Pyramids ¦ CheopsATLAS-TNED ¦ CheopsATLAS-GLACIATION ¦

OVERVIEW CHEOPS ATLAS PORTAL

AtmosVolumeMass: 5Okt2020

ADDITIONAL 2021:

During the whole year 2021 several contributions arrived to clarify the picture, further.

— A more extensive deduction with examples is given in

Nov2021 ¦ EXE1475 ¦ EXE1475oxQ ¦ Kfactor ¦ GasTABLE ¦ VolMassU ¦ TheK ¦ TheM ¦ EAM ¦ TheK ¦ DRYmATMOS and

M0 ¦ with further ..

AtmosVolumeMass

SIMPLE BASIC CONNECTIONS

MASS PERCENT FROM VOLUME PERCENT

‡ Tt¦10^±

ConBEAT connections ¦ U&u:

——————————

%m = m/M = uU/M

%v = %v

%m/%v = m/[ M%v = m1%v1 + ... = u(U1%v1 + ...) = uÛ ] ¦ Û = u-flex ;

%m/%v = m/uÛ = uU/uÛ = U/Û ;

——————————

Rough Earth air mean atomic/molecular weight Û:

Û = (kväveN2¦U=28¦Vol%78 + syreO2¦U=32¦Vol%21 + argonAr¦U=40¦Vol%1)/100 = 28.96 ;

others are omitted — those contribute with negligible measures in this simplified part:

CORRESPONDING GASES MASS PERCENTAGE mass% IN OUR AIR; Û¦u-flex ;

———————————————————————————

Mass%/Vol% = ActualMass(Ugas) / volumeMeanMassAll(Û) ¦ as above deduced

= %m/%v = Ugas/Û ;

%m = %v · Ugas/Û

In rough figures:

————————————————————————

X %v %m Uatom Ugas n number individual atoms m ¦ KG = %m · (mJATM = 5.2869 T18 KG)

— —— —— —— —— ——————————— —————

O 21 23.20 16 32 4.6180 T43 1.2266 T18

N 78 75.41 14 28 1.7153 T44 3.9871 T18

Ar 01 01.38 40 40 1.0995 T42 7.3023 T16

———————————————————————— Sum:

100 99.99

————————————————————————

WIKIPEDIA Atmosphere of Earth [Sep2020] ”average molecular weight of dry air” gives Û-values resp.

28.96¦28.946 with a figure Earth’s Atmosphere mass mJATM = 5.148 T18 KG.

The Wikipedia reference to that value mentions ”estimates”: precise mathematical form unknown.

———————————————————————————————————

mJATMref: AtmosVolumeMass ¦ EAM

More precisely calculated — as deduced below with comparing:

mJATM¦Oxygen = mJATM × 23.1551%m from 20.9460%v — same expression:

Û = 28.946 — we have used the lower Wikipedia suggested mean atmospheric weight in calculating the %m-value:

————————————————————————————

mJATM¦Oxygen mJATM

TNED 1.2241849215 T18 KG 5.2868963063 T18 KG

Wikipedia 1.1920233746 T18 KG 5.1480000000 T18 KG

————————————————————————————

In this presentation we always use a TNED reference for comparing purposes and as a benchmark for testing general physics.

‡ Tt¦10^±

CALCULATING EARTH’s ATMOSPHERIC MASS

EarthATMOSPHEREmassContent

Earth atmosphere calculated by deduction:

mJATM :

:

Requat.⁴¦ mJATM = (101 325 Pa)4π · (6.378 T6 M)⁴ / (GmJ) = 5.2869 T18 KG our rough value

————————

G = 6.67 t11 JM/(KG)²

mJ = 5.975 T24 KG see comparing details in different sources in mJREF and BEVIS.

———————————————————————————————————————————————

WIKIPEDIA:s mJATM-value 5.148 T18 KG arrives with R-component R=(6.378 T6 – 42 300)M in Requat.⁴:

5.1480310 T18 KG.

ConBEAT: 3Okt2020 — More extensive above in AtmosVolumeMass

An additional (same) ConBeat is found in ConBEAT

ConBEAT-deduced connections: EARTH BIOSPHERE ISSUES ¦ vät ¦ hydHvat ¦ watH2Osyr ¦ oxyOyYEAR

————————————————————————————————————————————

Hesc ............. 9.50 T7 KGvät/y ........ HESC-processen ¦ MASSFLYKTEN — Wikipedia (Aug2017) ¦ = mH/y

Wsplit .......... 8.55 T8 KGvat/y ........ (mH/y) × (18vat/2vät) = mH2O/y = (18/2)Hesc ¦ HydrogenESCape process

Ostay ........... 7.60 T8 KGsyr/y ....... (mH/y) × (16syr/2vät) = mO/y = (16/2)Hesc

Otime .......... 1.610770 T9 y ........... (m¦JatmO=1.2242 T18 KG)/Ostay — HESC-processen 21 volymprocent Jordsyrebildningstid

Wtime .......... 1.6374269 T12 y ....... (m¦JoceH2O = 1.4 T21* KG)/Wsplit — HESC-processens oceantömningstid

————————————————————————————————————————————

* FMTabell: 2.59 T22 KG + 2.2123 T21 KG = 2.81123 T22 KG ¦ ~ 2.8 T22 ¦ / 20 = 1.4 T21 KG ‡ Tt¦10^±

CONVERSIONS BETWEEN ATOMIC MASSES (ConBEAT)

Additionally added deduced connections from basic physics 3Oct2020

MASSFLYKTEN — Wikipedia (Aug2017) — 9.5 T7 KGväte/y

ATOMIC MASSES — 1ORmany atoms together — international MKSA-units (History):

——————————————————————————————————————

u = atomic mass unit in KG = 1/12 of carbon 6C12 ¦ also amu ; conv. [Wikipedia] Dalton unit u

m = mass in KG of 1ORmany individuals ;

N = number of individuals in N ;

mi = m/u

= U = number of u:s in m

= standard (atomic weight) table values for atom(Z¦A)

Several atoms in a single block [molecule] have U as the sum of the individual U:s

= DaltonMass of each individual in N: 1orManyAtoms ;

ms = mi · u = Uu ; single individual by mass in KG

m = N · Uu ; all single individuals by mass in KG

= N · u · mi

= N · ms

= NUu ; GENERAL GAS LAW

N = m/Uu ;

miu = Uu = umi = m in KG ;

umiN = total mass in KG of all m(U) individuals in N

= NUu

= m(TOTAL)

-----------------------------------

umi = Uu

-----------------------------------

mi = U

-----------------------------------

GENERAL CONVERSION BETWEEN DIFFERENT masses:

-----------------------------------------------------------------

ONLY WITH SAME N number of individuals BETWEEN DIFFERENT ELEMENTS

-----------------------------------------------------------------

m(TOTAL1) = m1 ;

m(TOTAL2) = m2 ;

:

m1/m2 = N1uU1/N2uU2 ;

N1 = N2: ;

:

m1/m2 = U1/U2

= mi1/mi2

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Example — H2O: U¦H2 = 2; U¦O = 16; U¦H2O = 18:

——————————————————————

m(KGsyre) = (9.5 T7 KGväte)·(16syre/2väte)

= 7.6 T8 KGsyre

m(KGvatten) = (9.5 T7 KGväte)·(18vattn/2väte)

= 8.55 T8 KGvatten

-----------------------------------------------------------------

(1.2242 T18 KGsyre)/(7.6 T8 KGsyre/y) = 1.610770 T9 y;

(1.4 T21 KGvattn)/(8,55 T8 KGvatten/y) = 1.637427 T12 y

= 1 637.427 Gy = 2.436647 Uages a (2×336Gy = 672Gy).

ADDITION:

THE ORIGINAL CORRECTION [href="CheopsAT.htm#Eco2" in MASSFLYKTEN]

— 11Jul2020 without the above fully related references — became a real (»rare») mess.

It is preserved as below[‡] — just for purposes of a full case history account:

• the most prominent mistakes, as they come and can be explained — if at all.

Correct: ARCHIVE DOCUMENT — it has no actual value in the original writ [any longer]

CORRECTIONS IN UNIVERSE HISTORY — faulty statements with related corrections — This section was introduced 10Jul2020 @Swedish Solartime 22:00

THERE WAS A PASSAGE wherein THE AUTHOR WAS SLOPPY (tired, maybe exhausted .. ».. I give up ..») ENOUGH TO MISS SOME FUNDAMENTALS OF ..

All these issues have been settled with the ConBEAT compiled connections and deductions — further explained and exemplified (also from other sources) from there ..

— ConBEAT handles all the settled details (with zero error) — a shorter copy above in CONBEAT.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Faulty statements are not allowed in Universe History — if found, it should be corrected (and duly explained — in short)

CORRECTIONS IN UNIVERSE HISTORY

(There should be a minimum — zero — of them, otherwise we’re fried):

LINKS ARE or should be GIVEN IN ACTUAL SECTIONS EXPLAINING ALL MATH AND PHYSICS TO BASICS

An erroneous statement is uniquely marked [E ‡ number — only at a main location, which other parts are exposed here] and linked here:

UNIVERSE HISTORY IS with less frequent exceptions a general production in SWEDISH ONLY (yet).

Only in some specific concerns some (wider) presentation is given directly in English.

— Why not in English from square one?

— Good question, perhaps with a good answer:

Native reflectivity in any crucial work guarantees a maximum focus on descriptive syntax (errors are definitely not allowed). We have to take it all from there.

— OnLineTranslators on internet (a real disaster 2016+), as yet experienced in connection to a direct English translation from Swedish (in science matters), is a veritable nightmare: a detour through Japan gives more credit.

E1: Correct

UnivHistKcellen.htm

Faulty statement: — Energin är generellt effektens integral (effekten P = Et; P/t=E som ger varianten dP/dt=E; dP = E dt).

Corrected 2011-06-25¦25Jun2011 — Energin är generellt effektens integral (effekten P = E/t; Pt=E som ger varianten dE/dt=P; dE = P dt).

eng. — Energy is in general power’s integral (effect P = E/t; Pt=E giving the variant dE/dt=P; dE = P dt).

———————————————

source¦section¦document: EFFEKTKURVAN ¦

RELATED: E(Energy-Work)¦P(Power-effect) E(J) = mad = Fd = UQ = U·It = UI·t = P(W)t ; P = E/t ; Pt = E.

possible reason: — Take more breaks (with more fruit) — editor’s proof-reading receives more focus then. (I have to shape up).

E2: Correct

CheopsRektangelIII.htm

zStatNaturPaus201617c.htm

zStatNaturPaus201617d.htm

Faulty statement: — Om Väteflykten associeras med upplösning av atmosfäriskt vatten [‡1], tillkommer i netto per år

([U[O]=16/U[H]=1]=16)(95 T3·T3 KG=9,5 T7 KGväte/år) = 1,52 T9 KGsyreatomer /år

från (U[H2O]=18)/(U[O]=16)=1,125(1,52 T9 KGvatten) = 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år.

Corrected 2021-12-31¦11Jul2020 — Om Väteflykten associeras med upplösning av atmosfäriskt vatten [‡1], tillkommer i netto per år

([(U[O]=16)/{2}(U[2H]=2)]=4)(95 T3·T3 KG=9,5 T7 KGväte/år) = 3,80 T8 KGsyreatomer /år

från (U[H2O]=18)/(U[O]=16)=1,125(1,52 T9 KGvatten) = 4,275 T8 KGvatten/år.

:

However: this formal correction type has poor explaining power. A more explaining corrected edition — see further related below:

—Väteflyktens H2O.association 9,5 T7 KGväte/år innehåller (9,5 T7 KG)/2 = 4.75 T7 KG vätepar. Väteparet {2} frigör syreatomer med massan (16/{2}=8)(4.75 T7 KG) = 3.8 T8 KGsyreatomer/år. Avgivna vattenmängden H2O blir (18/16=1,125)(3.8 T8 KGsyre/år) = 4,275 T8 KGvatten/år. [E ‡ 2]

eng.:

—HydrogenEscape H2O.association 9,5 T7 KGhydo/y contains (9,5 T7 KG)/2 = 4.75 T7 KG HPair; The pair {2} liberates O-atoms with mass (16/{2}=8)(4.75 T7 KG) = 3.8 T8 KGoxyAtoms/y.

Expedited amount H2O becomes (18/16=1,125)(3.8 T8 KGoxy/y) = 4,275 T8 KGwater/y. [E ‡ 2]

———————————————

source¦section¦document: Massflykten ¦

zStatNaturPaus201617c.htm

RELATED as here only: H₂O → HOH

↓

9.5 T7 Wikipedia Earth mass, Net losses

——— KGhydrogen/y ; HydrogenEscape rate HESC = 9.5 T7 KGoxygen/y

1

:

U: 1 16 1 → O(U)/H(U) = 16/2 ; U in Dalton(u)Units (1u = 1.66033 t27 KG = m[6C12]/12)

H₂O → H O H

↓ ↓

9.5 T7

x = ——— KGhydrogen/y ; x = 2H/y = 4.75 T7 KGhydrongenPairs/y

2

:

O KGoxygen/y = U(O/2H) × x = (16/2=8)(9.75 T7 KG/2y) = 4 × 9.75 T7 KGhydrogen/y = 3.80 T8 KGoxygen/y

possible reason: — not really related to other than one O-atom to 1 H-atom — »with no further commitment»: unfinished business.

CONSEQUENCES: Profitable — in general (our onset with »a worst case reckoning» holds good):

• All RATES connecting the figures are decreased 4 times when corrected as above;

• Most prominent:

— With the HydrogenEscape rate HESC = 9.5 T7 KG/y, our PresentEarthAtmospheric oxygen

(21% of 5.3 T18 KG = 1.113 T18 KGoxygen) would need a period of

(1.13 T18 KGoxygen)/(3.80 T8 KGoxygen/y) = 2.9289473 T9y =~ 3 billion years to appear;

• That should be from the moment accurate oxygen release begins — with no type CO-O=CO2 absorption;

• Free 100% HESC-supported atmospheric oxygen will only be pounded out from the moment any (CO) present atmospheric CO2 is already saturated. And it takes 3 billion years from that moment. Previous figure:

~ 700 million years.

• The corresponding water replacement rate — HESC »consumes» water molecules rising up from Earth — reckoned on on present ocean water mass (1.4 T21 KG) is

(1.4 T21 KGwater)/(4.275 T8 KGwater/y) = 3.274 8538 T12y =~3 275 billion years. Previous figure was

~ 818 billion years.

OCCASIONS: 11 places ”1,52” in the actual document, + 3 + 1 places in two additional documents

(with some contextual additional parts as accounted below);

These occasions are given here in their faulty original

— corrections have been made on these with the above related figures;

actual links removed, only markings remain here:

Actual document 2017I1¦ top-down ”1,52” 1:

1,71 T9 KGvatten/år med syreuppdelningen

1,52 T9 KGsyre/år som återgår till Jordmanteln genom oxidationsprocesser

— om balansräkningen gäller: Se även i SYREASSOCIATIONEN.

För att fylla hela nuvarande havsoceanernas ca 1,4 T21 KGvatten med en tillrinning 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år skulle tiden lika med drygt 818 miljarder år krävas. Den avrinningen är så låg att den helt saknar kvantitativ betydelse — men har en

2:

Mängden som skulle behövas för att (precis) uppväga väteflykten (som kopplar till en långsam vattensönderdelning i Jordatmosfärens toppskikt via solstrålningens kortvågiga inverkan) ur Jordatmosfären [‡] är bara runt 5 hundratusendelar av mEros 3,225 T13 KG/år:

— 1,52 T9 KGsyre/år.

3-4:

— Om Väteflykten associeras med upplösning av atmosfäriskt vatten [‡1], tillkommer i netto per år

([U[O]=16/U[H]=1]=16)(95 T3·T3 KG=9,5 T7 KGväte/år) = 1,52 T9 KGsyreatomer /år

från (U[H2O]=18)/(U[O]=16)=1,125(1,52 T9 KGvatten) = 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år.

..

— För att fylla nuvarande världsoceaner med deras grovt 1,4 T21 KG vatten, tabellen nedan, krävs med flödet 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år tiden (1,4T21/1,71T9/år =) avr. 818,7 T9 år.

Håller vattenbanken i litosfären — hårda berget — totalt 2,6 T22 KG kemiskt bundet vatten, kan den tidrymden upprepas 26/1,4~18,6 gånger eller totalt under drygt

15 227,82 miljarder år — jämför K-cellens halvperiod: 336 miljarder år.

Verkligen enastående.

22,5 Universum, enligt TNED-Diakvadraten.

5:

• på plussidan av det syre [‡] 1,52 T9 KG/år som kvarstår efter väteflykten sedan solljuset i Jordatmosfärens toppskikt sönderdelat de toppatmosfäriska vattenmolekylerna som

:

• på minussidan via en bergvittrande erosionstakt [‡] (från utläckning ur Jordskorpans Litosfär [‡]) av 3,225T13 KGerosionsmaterial/år med i så fall motsvarande avdelat/urkokat 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år:

6:

— Väteflykten [‡] — övrigt försumbart — uppgår till 9,5 T7 KGväte/år (U=1). Motsvarande syreuppdelning (U=16) är 1,52 T9 KGsyre/år, och vattenuppdelning (U=18) är 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år.

— För erosionsmassan att försörja tillflödet till atmosfären av den vattenmassan och därmed underhålla väteflykten på en konstant bevarad ämnes atmosfär, krävs då att minst en del på 5,30232 t5 eller 0,005% av erosionmassan innehåller kemiskt mineralbundet vatten som frigörs kontinuerligt vid Jordytans erosion.

7-8:

— 1,52 T9 KGsyre/år som avdelas via solljusets inverkan via väteflykten, krävs tydligen tiden

T(21%SyreAtm) = (0,21 · 5,3 T18KGsyre) / (1,52 T9 KGsyre/år)

= 0,732236 T9 år ; tiden för nuvarande syrebildning

Tas också motsvarande tid med för kvävets avdelning ur den ursprungliga HONC-gruppens ammoniakdel (NH3) med, skulle värdet i så fall ovan adderas med en H3/H2=1,5-del: 1+1,5=2,5 gånger ovanstående skulle ge

= 1,825 T9 år ; grovräknad bildningstid för nuvarande Syre + Kväveatmosfär

MEN: — »Temperaturekvivalenta volymvärdet» i grovräkningen från beskrivningen i JPG, startvärdet

72 384,75 °K, ligger redan en bra bit över den på annat ställe grovräknande Jordens primärtemperatur från början

(J-kroppens expansion föregående Diakvadraten),

68 477,667 °K.

— Kompressionanalogin i JPG visar i så fall att Jordatmosfären för det lägre värdet — och vidare med avsvalningen ner mot kritiska ångpunkten (b: 650°K) — skulle vara mera tajt kramad kring Jordytan. Och därmed en mera långsam väteflyktstakt:

— Värdet ovan 1,825 miljarder år kan då ses som en (absolut) lägsta värdegräns.

9-10:

Med 1,52 T9 KGsyre/år krävs för vår tids 21% av Jordatmosfärsmassan 5,3 T18 KG tiden

(0,21 · 5,3 T18KGsyre) / (1,52 T9 KGsyre/år) = 0,732236 T9 år ; tiden för nuvarande syrebildning

— Drygt 700 miljoner år.

— Lägre väteflyktstakt ger motsvarande längre bildningstid -- grovt 5ggr för att få bildningstiden runt 3,5 miljarder år.

Tas kvävedelen med i HONC-ämnena (NH₃, Ammoniak) skulle ytterligare en H3/H2=1,5-del behöva frigöras för att få fram nuvarande luftkvävedel på 78%:

0,73 T9 år + 1,5(0,73 T9 år) = 2,5(0,73 T9 år) = 1,825 T9 år.

11:

1,52 T9 KGsyre(1,43KG/M³)/år → 3,225 T13 KGerosionsmaterial (2500KG/M³)/år — 1,71 T9 KGvatten/år

=

1 syreatom per 21 215,98 erosionsmaterialatomer

1 KGsyre per 21,215198 TONerosionsmaterial: aluminiumoxid, kopparoxid, järnoxid, metalloxider generellt

———————————————————————————————————————————

Vi vet här inte närmare hur den siffran stämmer överens med eventuella utvärderingar på plats.

— Det är emellertid vad som krävs för att hålla Oceanernas vattenbestånd och atmosfäriska syrets 21%-andel fortsatt konstant, enligt Mauna Loa Beviset i förening med Diakvadraten.

— ca 5/1000 % vatten avdelas ur erosionsmaterialet, enligt räkningen ovan, och som reserveras för väteflykten ur Jordatmosfären.

Additional 1.71:

— Uppgiften (WikipediaVäteFlykten) med utflödet av väte från Jordatmosfären, som anställer ett krav på motsvarande vatteninflöde från Jordskorpans mineralbundna vattenreserver med

1,71 T9 KG/år

för att hålla nuvarande oceaner vid deras 1,4 T21 KG vatten, medför att hela oceanvattenvolymen fylls på en gång varje avr.

818,7 miljarder år = 1,4 T21 KG / 1,71 T9 KG/år.

— Blotta det faktum ATT en sådan väteflykt pågår kontinuerligt OCH det faktum ATT havsoceanerna verkligen finns — inte har uttorkat — bevisar den översiktliga rimligheten i hela det grovräknande komplexet: Jordmantelns mineralmassa tappar ur sig just runt

1,71 T9 KG vatten årligen för att balansera väteflykten i toppatmosfären som beror på solljusets långsamma uppdelning av vattenmolekyler i väte och syre. Syret stannar kvar (överskottet syreoxiderar med [den järnrika] Jordmantelerosionens bergmassa), medan Jordgravitationen inte förmår hålla kvar det lätta vätet längst upp.

Grovräkningen ovan som visar analogierna med enmeterskuben i miniatyr med Oceanerna förångade i atmosfären antyder att väteflykten inte heller i Jordens urhistoria har varit större — snarare mindre: Jordkroppens avsvalning tiden från »MaxKub=MaxTemp» fram till tiden då ångbildningspunkten för atmosfärsoceanvattnet underskrids sett från Jordytan — »MiniKuben» — antyder en mera komprimerad mera hårt omhållen Jordatmosfär med större massinnehåll.

För att matcha nuvarande väteflyktshastighet (WikipediaEscape) med ovan antydda Jordhistoria — 20,82 T9 år (Månens Recession; Månens Ytmineralogi) fram till hit — 1st HavsOceaner 1,4 T21 KG vatten fylls kontinuerligt på 1 gång per 818,7 T9 år ur Jordmantelns (Litosfärens) totalt uppskattade kemiskt mineralbundna 2,59 T22 KG vatten — bör Jordatmosfärens primära vatteninnehåll ha varit

utfällda tidigast ca 3,5 T9 år bakåt; 20,82–3,5=17,32

+

utfyllda ; vattenreduktionen 1,4T24KG/818,7T9år via väteflykten + nuvarande HavsOceaner 1,4 T21 KG:

— Men: Vi har inga direkta uppgifter om HUR den — enligt TNED-teorin — primärheta Jordkroppen distribuerade sin primärmineralogiska vattenblandning i Jordkroppens ytskikt.

— Nämligen den primärt mycket heta Jordkroppen och hur, exakt, vattenångan i toppskikten förhöll sig;

— Ingen mera noggrann orienteringspreferens är här känd för det fallet.

Sämsta fallets grovräkning antyder att vi INTE bör anta att primäratmosfären innehöll MER än (drygt) 1st nuvarande HavsOceaner:

Väteflykten (Massflykten) med motsvarande vattenpåfyllning ur Jordskorpan antyder en påfyllnadsperiod om (oerhörda) drygt 818 miljarder år. Tiden från Jordkroppens bildning fram till nu är i stora drag helt försumbar i det perspektivet.

..

— Den ordningen garanterar att framtiden också fortsättningsvis kommer att innehålla 1st HavsOcean + lika stor mängd vatten 1,4 T21 KG som fylls på 1 gång per 818,7 miljarder år med motsvarande väteflykt ur Jordatmosfären, och resterande överskottssyre som ingår i den eroderande mineralcykeln — så länge Jordkroppens inre värmefysik tillåter det.

Syredelen som återstår efter solljusets uppdelning av toppatmosfärens vattenmolekyler i Väte+Syre blir — eller måste bli det för att bankräkningen ska stämma — DELS det syre som vår nuvarande atmosfär håller (konstant), plus en mindre del som omsätts/kapas via Jordmantelerosionernas syreoxidationer. Allt i grova översiktliga drag.

— Om den räkningen håller streck, skulle det (främst) betyda (tryckfysiken, KubExemplet) att Jordatmosfären från början skulle ha varit ytterligt komprimerad relativt nuvarande jämförande normala tryckvolym vid havsytan — och därmed en möjlig starkt reducerad väteflyktshastighet relativt ovanstående mera generösa räkning. Vi håller det i minnet för ev. vidare.

:

TOTALGLOBALBUDGET — enligt antydd, men ännu inte helt bevisad, ordning ovan:

Jordmanteln H₂O[1st HavsOcean 1,4 T21 KG per 818,7 miljarder år] → Jordatmosfären + Solljuset → H₂-Väteflykt + O-JorderosionensOxidation:

— Luftens syreandel 21% bevaras konstant såväl som HavsOceanernas 1,4 T21 KG vatten så länge Jordens inre värmebank så tillåter.

..

• JORDMANTELNS PRIMÄRT STORA MINERALOGISKT BUNDNA VATTENBANK FÖRSÖRJER HELA HAVSOCEANERNAS VATTENMASSA 1,4 T21 KG via mineralogisk urkokning och erosion en gång varje dryga 818 miljarder år (MassFlykten) på samma mängd motsvarande väteflykt (9,5 T7 KGväte/år) ur Jordatmosfären via solljusets inverkan i Jordens toppatmosfär (Ozonskärmen) — med motsvarande förnyelse eller underhåll av ozonskiktet. Det frigjorda syret, huvuddelen, ingår i ett ytterst långsamt mineralogiskt oxidationskretslopp, se Syreassociationen.

OTHER DOCUMENT 1: havsoceanernas ca 1,4 T21 KG vatten skulle bli 818 miljarder år

zStatNaturPaus201617d.htm ———————————————

source¦section¦document: VadHänderOM ¦

OTHER DOCUMENT 2: 1:

CheopsRektangelIII.htm Jordytans bergmineral med en takt av 1 st nuvarande havsocean per 818,7 T9 år

———————————————

source¦section¦document: JordenLivet ¦

2:

SyreTID med nuvarande övre atm. H2O-sönderdeln., se Väteflykten nedan:

(1,11 T18 KG)/(1,52 T9 KGsyre/år) = 730 miljoner år från max 4 T9 år bakåt

3:

Väteflykt .................... 9,5 T7 KGväte/år ........... avgår

Syrebildning ................ 3,80 T8 KGsyre/år ......... oxideras med jordytan

Vattenupplösning ........ 4,275 T8 KGvatten/år .... avdelas genom bergerosion

Havsoceanerna .......... 1,4 T21 KG (1,37 T21 KG);

———————————————

source¦section¦document: JordBiosfären ¦

4:

syre längre tillbaka än drygt 3,5 miljarder år, BonniersCitatet). Med den aktuella väteflyktstakten etableras en nuvarande (primär) atmosfärisk syremängd (21%) på tiden drygt 700 miljoner år (0,732236 T9 år).

———————————————

source¦section¦document: PrimJordT ¦

5:

— Solljuset har JordenBegin bildat Jordatmosfärens syredel 1,107 T18 KG (på drygt 700 miljoner år från början) genom sönderdelning av vattenånga från en primär havsoceans

———————————————

source¦section¦document: Syremängden -- jämförelser ¦

6:

— Med nuvarande väteflyktshastighet skulle i så fall HELA nuvarande 21% atmosfäriska syre ha bildats under loppet av drygt 700 miljoner år (TRYCKFAKTA: 0,732236 T9 år) — nära tiden från det att vatten först fälldes ut på Jordytan — enligt BonniersCitatet med samhörande tillförlitliga geologiska data tidigast 5 miljarder år bakåt härifrån (”3,3-3,6” T9 år bakåt).

———————————————

source¦section¦document: JordenBegin ¦

PreC: CAS

CheopsATLAS	CheopsATLAS TNED	CheopsATLAS Glaciation	CheopsATLAS Pyramids
CheopsATLAS GOLDEN SECTION versus FLINDERS PETRIE 1883 Cheops Pyramid	CheopsATLAS TNED EXPLAINING DETAILS with History: TNED to Petrie	CheopsATLAS Glaciation Testing A GEOLOGICAL explanation	CheopsATLAS Pyramids WHY would satanists build PYRAMIDS? Idea Origin — EXAMPLES in precision

AUTUMN is the first true life sign of a coming SPRING — and there is noting to it. The first flower — Weathered and eroded cliffs in eastern northern Sweden.

CheopsATLAS Portal — Mar2020

innehåll: content SÖK på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök alla ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning över alla webbsidor

Universums Historia — CheopsATLAS in UNIVERSE HISTORY

ämnesrubriker

innehåll — CONTENT

CheopsAT — portal

Background

Calling Atlantis

EMAG — The EARTH MASS AND the Gravitational CONSTANT

anoKEPLER

MathLIST

MathLISTiau

ITproc

ResTAB

TEB — TNED basics

SEM — Sun energy machine

SUN4

ATD — available time data —Sun mass calculus

SunMassNOW

OldG — instrumental epoch standard values reference

SYNTabell2 — iterations chart

SYNTabell2det — iterations chart

BinMap — BACKGROUND IN MATHEMATICS

EndSTATION — Q, the electric charge

CAS — CHEOPS ATLAS 4 SERIES documents

SSD — SPREAD SHEET DETAILS

Kalkylkorten — CalCARDS

TABS

ShortSum 2020

WH2020 — WORLD HEALTH 2020

OQill OXYGEN QUEST ILLUSTRATED ¦ Corona Virus Issues Mars 2020

TOQ — THE OXYGEN QUEST 31Mar2020 — Short summation from the original Swedish edition

RÉSUMÉ — CHEOPS RECTANGLE nov2017-mar2020

AtVoMa — AtmosVolumeMass 5Oct2020

mJATMref

ConBEAT — related conversion connections between atomic masses

CORRECTIONS IN UNIVERSE HISTORY — related — of no relevance now [ Nov2021+ ]

CONTENT by detail

referenser

[HOP]. HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGraw-Hill 1967

Atomviktstabellen i HOP allmän referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 s9–65—9–86.

m_n = 1,0086652u ...................... neutronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]

m_e = 0,000548598u .................. elektronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3 s7–155 för m_e , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]

u = 1,66043 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27, 1967]

u = 1,66033 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular Weight]

u = 1,66041 t27 KG ............... atomära massenheten [FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]

u = 1,66053886 t27 KG ........ atomära massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL-506W (2005)]

u = 1,6605402 t27 KG .......... atomära massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]

u = 1,660538782 t27 KG ...... atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],

CODATA rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe on Data for Science and Technology)]

c₀ = 2,99792458 T8 M/S ........ ljushastigheten i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på 1970-talet)]

h = 6,62559 t34 JS ................. Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]

[BA]. BONNIERS ASTRONOMI 1978

— Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.

[FM]. FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 — Fysikens, kemins och astronomins historia — Allt från atomen till universum — fysik, kemi, jordvetenskap och astronomi, Register med appendix,

FOCUS UPPSLAGSBÖCKER · STOCKHOLM — Andra, reviderade upplagan 1975

[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12 band A(1922)-Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT A-Ö(1929)

t för 10^–, T för 10⁺, förenklade exponentbeteckningar — simplified notations: t for TEN RAISED TO minus and T for TEN RAISED TO plus.

MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern ACademy — etablerad vetenskap sedan början av 1800-talet

TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS — Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.

(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=m_nc₀r_n, analogt Atomkärnans Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad, vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således) också

RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.

See also TNED FROM THE BEGINNING (Swedish edition only Aug2019).

SHORT ENGLISH — TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain

(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).

TNED or Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details claim to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.

Senast uppdaterade version: 2021-12-31

*END.

Stavningskontrollerat 2020-03-27¦27Mar2020 ¦ 18Nov2021.

rester

*

åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se

≈ Δ Ĵ ∫ α √ π → ∞ τ π ħ ε UNICODE — often used charcters in mathematical-technical-scientifical descriptions

σ ρ ν ν π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ ω → ∞ ≡ ↔↕ ħ ℓ

Ω Φ ϕ ϕ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ ~

α β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ σ ω ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫ ≤ ≈ ≥ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓

ζ ξ

Arrow symbols, direct via Alt+NumPadKeyboard: Alt+24 ↑; 25 ↓; 26 →; 27 ←; 22 ▬

23 ↨ — also 18 ↕; 29 ↔

åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se