CheopsATLAS ¦ TNED — Universums Historia

CHEOPS ATLAS ¦ TNED — Feb2020 — UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA | a production 2020I1 | Senast uppdaterade version: 2024-03-01 · Universums Historia

innehåll content denna sida · webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning alla webbsidor

NatCH ¦ CheopsATLAS-Begin ¦ CheopsATLAS-Pyramids ¦ CheopsAT ¦ Resolution 217 ¦ C14darting

RESPONSIBLE: rJCIRCLE COMPLEX — THE TWO PYRAMID AGENTS rJCR¦b16 and PetrieCR¦b58 defines the actual physical Petrie 1833 measured CheopsPyramid — THE FUNDAMENTAL PETRIE POINTS

BASED ON THE FLINDERS PETRIE 1883 MEASUREMENTS — See our @INTERNET Petrie Source — Proving THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT

PROVING PRECISE CHEOPS PYRAMID QUANTITIES

THROUGH The CHEOPS RECTANGLE GOLDEN SECTION PARAGON rJCIRCLE COMPLEX — Feb2020+

THOUSANDS OF YEARS BACK FROM HERE some established sources claim, in some parts, a no-easy-explainable glaciation history — only over the northern Earth part. THAT promotes a further GeoATLANTIS investigation. See special treatise glaciation article in this unique Feb2020+ CheopsATLAS series.

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 222 .. 333 .. ¦ ATLANTIS ¦ GTursprunget2019 ¦ AtlantisAPPENDIX ¦ CHEOPS REKTANGEL ¦

— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday .. A GEOATLANTIS might EXPLAIN some elseway mentioned mysterious Northern Hemisphere GLACIATION VARIATIONS ¦ COMPILED FOR UH 3Mar2020

• Background.

After The rJCIRCLE breakthrough (Nov2017—CHEOPS RECTANGLE) the urge of finding eventual geological explanations was deepened. See (Sw. ed.) ATLANTIS with a follow-up here on CheopsAtlasGlaciation — still investigating as long as proof of impossibilities have not arrived. In improving the details from Nov2017 — now with a more strict quantitative test on the two pyramid agents rJCR¦b16 and Petrie CR¦b58 — a full delivery of Petrie matching Cheops Rectangle Golden Section constants has arrived — see all details in CheopsATLAS. The following is an appendage with some additional descriptions.

HowSTART

TWO PYRAMID AGENTS

CASING

TUNNELS

GALLERY

The B point

THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT

TCA

THE CENTRAL ASPECT

EQUIVALENTS

The 19th Course

Assembly:

ASSEMBLY

Scenario WITH MODERN STANDARDS 1800+

— Martha .. Was it 5566 or 6655 .. I’ve lost track of these The F Word numbers again ..

— Oh Henry then .. You must shape up and try to keep up .. Now we have to start all over again, all the way from the beginning, again ..

— By the way, have you heard of anybody, eventually, inventing any cure for the winds… Because I can hardly control any placing at all in bad weather ..

Scenario WITH TNED

Provided free energy and a PLAN

1 Stone Block per 10 seconds is perfectly mounted and set on each of the four sides; a total 4 blocks per second:

— A steady stream of MANY computer programmed air borne high tech machines travel from Quarry to Building.

— During the travel — as continuously communicated by the Building Crew Machines — a 3 D next stone forming Picture is sent to the transporting train of machines based on the actual progress, no two identically shaped stones, forming and shaping each block exactly following the General plan.

— When a prepared block reaches its building site, its placing is first prepared by a Precision Mortar Spraying machine within only a few seconds: 3 already set stone faces are mortar sprayed, and the remaining free 3 sides on each new stone block is then — held by an air vacuum servo on three sides — gently, exactly, smoothly and precisely PUT into place by the actual Machine in say max 6 to 7 seconds — continuously reporting its do and don’t to ALL THE OTHERS WITHOUT QUARREL: no breaks, no mistakes, no discussions, no arguing, no misunderstanding.

No tired legs.

Within some two months the entire edifice is finished: 2 300 000 medium some 2 ton stone blocks on 4 per 10 seconds makes 67 days — Provided free energy and plan. 2 months. Perfect Assembly.

COCT, overview:

IMPOSSIBLE to explain by quantity WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE rJCIRCLE complex.

TWO GOLDEN SECTION Cheops Rectangle PYRAMID AGENTS EXPLAIN and define CHEOPS PYRAMID QUANTITIES

THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT — PROOF

CHEOPS PYRAMID THROUGH CHEOPS RECTANGLE GOLDEN SECTION PARAGON rJCIRCLE COMPLEX

CASING, TUNNELS AND GALLERY — all by exact rJCIRCLE GS Petrie tolerance matching quantities:

recurring fixed determined constants explain and prove the construction’s vital 3 different locations.

R = (√5 – 1)/2 ¦ 16 ¦ 18 ¦ 58 ¦ The MiUNIT: 0.0254 M = 1’’ ¦

Summation

The quantity results from the rJCIRCLE complex GOLDEN SECTION CHEOPS RECTANGLE Paragon mathematical geometric structure leaves no doubt about the origin and how to find its key:

All investigated quantities are based on The rJCIRCLE identity definition and its CHEOPS RECTANGLE Cheops Pyramid identification [GS-body]:

— Our Earth mass 5.975 T24 KG on neutron density 1.87 T17 KG.

Based on the TNED deduced Neutron N3m20 toroid form [The Neutron] as the Planck constant h=mcr quantity on parts (PART I and PART II), the TNED complex is so and irrevocably undoubtedly connected with the Cheops Pyramid edifice:

— With the TNED associated NEUTRON SQUARE central connected neutron nuclear electron-positron mass factor 1818 + 18 + k the Cheops Pyramid calculated quantities — as definitions of the Petrie measured values — prove the familiarity on several sites, types and occasions.

The Neutron Square elliptic equations and functions, truly and obviously defining the Atomic Mass Defects with the correspondingly defined ATOMIC MASSES — practically equal to the experimentally measures [HOP] values — modern academic nuclear theory appears to be completely outclassed — explained in atomic detail. And more so, with a past historical record that breaks all barriers: an early high tech familiarity proven by these correspondences over the calculated quantities of the Cheops Pyramid, and the obvious appearing construction PLAN following them.

In short:

— THE PROVING CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT plan and its quantitative explanation and definition in detail of the Flinders Petrie 1883 measures of The Great (ancient Greek Cheops) Pyramid is fundamentally excluded, eliminated and precluded, impossible to deduce and build WITHOUT a basic corresponding rJCIRCLE equivalent: IN Proof by quantity and a perfectly deducible — simple — plan once the rJCIRCLE complex is adopted.

— The contracted construct, its plan and quantities prove an early previously Planet Earth existing based human culture and civilized technology — way far above this present one: destructive, nature denying. Especially on the level of nuclear physics and its NATURALLY PRECISELY RELATABLE deducible mathematics.

This is even more true with some prominent illuminating respect to Flinders Petrie’s own cogitated resolution (TCA): obviously a general principal — and principle — plan for also other pyramids in the neighborhood:

PetrieTCA:

Author’s water colour drawing from earlier periods in studying The object.

The 19th Floor — the 18th ROOF. Mai, oh Mai.

REVELATIONS AFTER FLINDERS PETRIE 1883: THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID

PETRIE BREAKS THE ENIGMATIC ICE

— COMPLETELY see The Contracting Proof :

DESCENDING PASSAGE TUNNEL HEIGHT ON AN OPTICAL/TRIGONOMETRIC 19th COURSE THICKNESS PROJECTION principle

PetrieCH7.32:

” 32. The original length of the entrance passage has not hitherto been known, except by a rough allowance for the lost casing.

But after seeing the entrances of the Third Pyramid, the South Pyramid of Dahshur, and the Pyramid of Medum, all of which retain their casing, there seemed scarcely a question but that the rule was

for the doorway of a Pyramid to occupy the height of exactly one or two courses on the outside.

That the casing courses were on the same levels as the present core courses, is not to be doubted, as they are so in the other Pyramids which retain their casing, and at the foot of the Great pyramid.3

The next step is to see if there is a course equal to the vertical height of the doorway; and, if so, where such a course occurs. ..”.

PetrieSource:

THE PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH, William Flinders Petrie 1883

W. M. Flinders Petrie 1883 — @INTERNET Ronald Birdsall, 2003-14

http://www.ronaldbirdsall.com/gizeh/petrie/index.htm

That (ProofCodON) breached more than the ice of the complex — in this authors deducing treasure hunting reference.

What is the breaking new?

With the now (Jan2020+) revealed Cheops ATLAS mapping quantitative proofs connecting to

The Golden Section CHEOPS RECTANGLE math:

— The OTHER pyramids

”.. all of which retain their casing ..”,

with the now (very) revealing early Petrie observation that

”.. the rule was for the doorway of a Pyramid to occupy the height .. ”, PetrieCH7.32 as above.

A strong indication of all ancient Pyramid origin by a general

CONTRACTED CONSTRUCTION PLAN.

AS SHOWN THROUGH THE rJCIRCLE COMPLEX IN QUANTITATIVE DETAIL:

— IF SO others built these: why not all of them? Give us one single shiny argument against.

THE RULE (ILLUSTRATED):

— The Entrance.

— Exactly what are you trying to share here?

— The OPTICAL/TRIGONOMETRIC 19th COURSE THICKNESS PROJECTION principle.

THIS:

— Obviously all other (Petrie) known pyramids (1883) were constructed (exactly) the same way as The Great Cheops Pyramid: After ONE (exactly) the same here so discovered in atomic detailed provable and relatable plan:

WHEREAS THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID AS RECENTLY STATED CANNOT BE DEDUCED, UNDERSTOOD OR REVEALED ITS PROVABLE QUANTITATIVE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCTION

BUILDING PLAN WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING rJCIRCLE COMPLEX EQUIVALENT, SO ALSO SHOULD COUNT FOR THE OTHERS OF THE SAME PLANNING: two independent co-working construction pyramid agents secure an actual third physical edifice:

AT LEAST IT IS SO PROVED ON THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID:

IMPOSSIBLE TO DEDUCE BY QUANTITY WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE rJCIRCLE complex.

No pyramid building at all — according to modern academic scholars.

— Kill these statements — if anyone can:

See UPDATED ORIGIN in NOTE24Feb2024:

These monuments are OLD — precursors to the much later civilizations Egypt and Sumer.

And so are all the South American Pyramids unless otherwise so proved.

Absolutely do correct if wrong.

Petrie is responsible for this discovered connection, provable in quantity detail in my reference:

No human hand (Compare Assembly) has been touching the build up of these monuments. It is or can be understood as a machine work based on sophisticated energy robotizing sources. That was my first and only conviction from the moment I got into the details many years ago as a first layman, no matter the fact that we don’t know the how of it:

— An ORGANIZATION from human workers on such a monumental edifice is beyond human capacity: no mistakes, no breaks, no conflicts, no doubts, no discussions, no obstructions, no tired feet, only exact monotone precision forming and placing 24/7 from a given non questionable by anyone plan until finished.

Always seeking a critical view. None yet found.

ProofCodON: ProCodONki ¦ Compiled 6Mar2020

THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID AT GIZEH OUTSIDE CAIRO WAS BUILT BY ENGINEERS FAMILIAR WITH THE MATH:

PROVING THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT

— The 52-53 inches vertical tunnel height and its trigonometrical/optical 19th course thickness projection .. what?

PROOF OF AN ADVANCED CONTRACTED CONSTRUCTION PLAN — main proof Jan2020+

THE IGNORANT (us, until ..) could introduce an arguing debate so:

— THE TUNNEL BREADTH is just an arbitrarily chosen measure by the pyramid engineers to minimize any rocky vulnerability to the overall final construct: maximum stress resistance. Case closed.

The debate had other volunteers:

— So you keep saying. The tunnel height can be explained in quantitative detail from the rJCIRCLE complex as a first consequence of the Golden Section Paragon CHEOPS RECTANGLE plan — see Figure on Point B determination from The 7. In detail:

THE CENTRAL JUNCTION BETWEEN DESCENDING FROM CASE AND ASCENDING TO GALLERY. Cheops Pyramid.

The rJCIRCLE complex explanation in precise (exact) Petrie measured quantities: How and why.

— The determination of The B Point is made through

• the main pyramid agent rJCR¦b16 by

• a specific INTERSECTION MATH based on

• specific Golden Section Paragon Arithmetics

The basic metrics in the CONSTRUCTION PLAN’s point B determination is between the given central ArcTan½ Line (The 7) and the two slightly different GS body ArcTan½ paragon line vertical intersect, their vertical difference, on UPPER and LOWER (we tested the most simple, and this is what we found, directly):

— The yATH (Ascending Tunnel Height) parameter connects to the Petrie observed 19th course trigonometric/optic projection principle (TCA), further underlining the existence of a (very) sophisticated PLAN for the whole;

SIMPLE MATH on heavy structure:

RESULT:

— The B point yATH property defines the main fundamental tunnel VERTICAL height property (basic: 43.3696399875’’, with following):

— yATH ascending tunnel height is the ascending ArcTan½ line vertically intersecting difference between the GS paragons Upper and Lower positions:

— With the pyramid agent spouse — PetrieCR¦b58 — an additional BUARM

B-point Upper Ascending ROOF (BUARM) Averaged MEAN

constant is added. These sum the yBarm = yATH + BUARM constant (46.9379317681’’).

— At First: Through it, the Petrie measured (1693.2 ± 0.6) yKING floor level (1693.1782168993’’) is identified along with the yPG point identification (1658.1652607385’’). But that is only a beginning:

THE REAL SHINY PROVING STEEL STUFF — the actual proof core:

— With a final (»secure and safe sealing») PYRAMID AGENT CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT, the two pyramid agents are geometrically pushed (TeP1) into each other by their given horizontal bOFFSET difference (21.6799079131’’). This effect creates THROUGH THE rJCR¦b16 agent’s DEFINED PETRIE B POINT — or rather makes appear — a final additional PETRIE B POINT VERTICALLY PROJECTIVELY COLLECTED sum of so »simply» and exactly deduced constants ending up on

• The cSIDE.

And the cSIDE — it is — is the trigonometric/optic casing (Enter) projection of the 19th course masonry thickness at the level of the descending entrance of The Great Cheops Pyramid:

37.9657350065’’.

— We can always cast suspiciousness on a treatise of which content our insight meets with big hungry dark question mark holes, awaiting to be filled with our more dearly beloved familiar pets.

— With Petrie’s own stated values (PetrieCH6.32 Row32 In Quote):

37.94 ± 0.17.

— With Petrie’s own values, for a cross checking trigonometric calculation

(Petrie’s casing angle in PetrieCH6.24¦32: 51° 53’ 20’’ ± 1’):

37.9640590055’’.

The small deviations all lie (well) within the Petrie given tolerance.

SO UNLESS MISTAKEN:

See UPDATED ORIGIN in NOTE24Feb2024.

Modern academic scholarly established decisions and consensus have no authority over history:

not over gravitation, not over electricity, not over human rights.

— In fact: not at all.

Cheops Pyramid was not built by ancient primitive Egyptians — definitely not around 2 500 BC.

— That building is (as the other Pyramids) OLD. Very.

Let us consider some strong arguments against: search for, none yet found.

ProCodONKING: From Jan2020 — ProofCodON ¦ rJCIRCLE complex ¦

ALL CHEOPS PYRAMID DATA FROM THE 1883 FLINDERS PERIE MEASURES — see PetrieSOURCE

3 SITE PROOF OF recurring constants on a CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT

PROVING THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID’s DISCOVERED AND SO DEDUCED CONSTRUCTIVE FOUNDATION

Recurring constants from plan

In analyzing our rJCIRCLE complex deduced constants, the following order has shown:

— Calculating the yKING level value 1693.2’’ ± 0.6 as defined by PetrieCH7.46

exposes a directory tree of deduced constants

all centered as deduced in the close B region

on the following resolved structure and character:

— »Your computer is confiscated». You have no say: — »We decide what you see». Microsoft definitely 2016+:

PICTURE COPY PRESERVES THE ORIGINAL CLEAR TEXT ON SMALL FONTS WHICH SOME WEB BROWSERS 2015+ HACKED

OUR personal COMPUTERS to omit IN BLOCKING AN EARLIER FREE PERSONAL CLEAR TYPE NAVIGATION. Liberty in live.

In shorter words:

— The parameters around the B-point transposes their same recurring significance on three different sites:

• the actual B point area

• the sloping floor end and its Great Step at the south Gallery end (Transpond)

• the Casing (cSIDE ¦ ProofCodON)

— All these — with further — give results as equal quantitative tight exact definitions to the measured Petrie values.

See

• DEFINING the Petrie B point

• DEFINING the Petrie measured yKING floor level

• DEFINING the LEVEL Petrie measured 19th stone block masonry course

• DEFINING the THICKNESS Petrie measured 19th stone block masonry course

• EQUALITIES — lists of rJCIRCLE complex quantities within the Petrie given tolerances.

THIS deduced WORK on Cheops Pyramid has used (PetrieSOURCE) electronic calculating devices and computer programming aid (Picture and Image handling). Without such support: Beyond the known capacity of this author.

So: With the obviously exposed advanced STRUCTURE of a profound mathematical level of sophistication in The Great Cheops Pyramid edifice: Clearly the constructing engineers behind had similar tools.

There is only one way to refute such a resolution: denial.

— You aim at THAT the above given proof proves an early human culture and civilization with an established existence of a computer based technology?

— More or less, yes. You need some concrete example?

THE REASON BEHIND PI IN THIS PRESENTATION

——————————————————

— The pi-VALUE?

— Just by a convenient adoption in observing a close normal — see the nVALUE. Comparing the difference throughout the calculating results shows that both are valid as parametric bases within the Petrie given tolerances (with a slight advantage with the pi version in some instances).

THE FUNDAMENTAL PETRIE POINTS:

The fundamental Petrie points

CHEOPS RECTANGLE MATHEMATICS — R = (√5 – 1)/2 = GOLDEN SECTION CONSTANT in this presentation

AS DEFINED BY EXACT GOLDEN SECTION PARAGON ARITHMETICS CALCULATIONS BY THE rJCIRCLE COMPLEX

All values in absolute measured MiUnit Inches; 0.0254 M = 1 Inch

The Subterranean Petrie P point :

CR-Agents:

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————————

point rJ-form value full decimal 2 decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.

xP_P xG + 10R 4227.9960057324 4228.00 4228.0 ± 2 ? PetrieCH7.36e

yP_P yG – nVALUE 1181.2313270982 1181.23 1181.0 ± 1 ? PetrieCH7.36e

Entrance and 19th Floor values:

CR-Agents:

point rJ-form value full decimal 2 decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.

xA_P yA/TanPC°* 524.1043769892 524.10 524.1 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.35

yA_P yA + nVALUE 668.1482038706 668.15 668.2 ± 0.1 PetrieCH7.35

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

*Core Masonry remnant Measuring Dependent Angle — corrupted in time with erosion and removed casing/masonry:

The PetrieCH7.32 measured PC° = 51° 53’ 20’ ± 1’ ¦ yA/TanPC = 524.1043769892’’.

yBlimitResolution:

From the rJCR¦b16 B point definition in The 7 Fundamental ArcTan½ line points: With the basic construction lines (AG)¦(AG)’ hidden inside the bulk masonry, a casing spotting measuring physically constructed corridor demands some sophisticated minor angular adjustments: A later measuring/revealing expedition (us, here with Petrie 1883) must have a chance of rediscovering the vital construction points. In working ourselves through these Petrie 1883 measured corresponding angles and figures, we arrive at this final destination in the point B region:

The lower green line is the parallel construction line through Fpp1 Pangle (P’A) ending on the ideal Cheops Rectangle CHEOPS PYRAMID ORIGINAL casing surface @ point O over A. At the vertical distance yPonB over this green lower line lies the blue actual physically constructed corridor floor, also ending on the casing surface, but slightly higher up, securing a spotting optical window to the Petrie measured/calculated casing point — as seen from inside the subterranean Petrie P point along the narrow 105 M long dark descending tunnel: . Roughly this spotting window is on a range 1/100 relative the tunnel’s ideal 1 meter squared section.

The Petrie B point:

CR-Agents:

point rJ-form value full decimal 2 decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.

xB_P xB + 18 1517.7016293661 1517.70 1517.8 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.64tab

yB_P yB – yBlimit 172.90450852550 172.90 172.9 ± 0.2 PetrieCH7.64tab

An example of a R-multiple Petrie Equality (Site recurring constants):

The Petrie D point:

CR-Agents:

point rJ-form value full decimal 2 decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.

xD_P 4704R 2907.2318830795 2907.23 2907.3 ± 0.6 PetrieCH7.39

yD_P 1380R 852.8869044749 852.89 852.6 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.39

BOTH yLEVELS ARE CENTERED ON THE PYRAMID’s VERTICAL MID LINE:

The Petrie PG point:

CR-Agents: = b1 = 4555.88

point rJ-form value full decimal 2 decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.

yPG (b₁–xB)/2 + yB–yBarm 1658.1652607385 1658.17 1658.2 ± 0.6 PetrieCH7.46

yKING yPG + yBlimit + 50R 1693.1782168993 1693.18 1693.2 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.46

Continuing:

Collection:

And so it came about:

The rJCIRCLE.

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 222 .. 333 .. ¦ ATLANTIS ¦ GTursprunget2019 ¦ AtlantisAPPENDIX ¦

— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday .. A GEOATLANTIS might EXPLAIN some GLACIATION VARIATIONS — GeoATLANTIS NORTHERN HEMISPHERE GLACIATION VARIATIONS.

What18: — OFK — Compiled for UD Jan2020 — ProvingThe 19th floor ¦

— As already noted: Not much in this presentation is known in modern academic quarters.

FLOOR 19 AND ROOF 18 — All atomic and nuclear physics

SEE ALSO FROM NatCH AND rJ — THE NEUTRON SQUARE: OFK = m_D_max18 — it is all about RELATED — 100% explainable — nuclear physics: IT connects C12/12

as the atomic mass u-unit — universal TNED RELATED PHYSICS experimentally verified definition of the atomic masses — OR: what modern academy missed completely:

WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT 18? [OffsetFactorK]

IF X WOULD BE VERY SPECIAL IN NATURE — MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS — WE WOULD CHOSE IT FOR EMPHASIZING ENDS

— especially if the expedition aims at certifying a familiarity with basic elementary most simple nuclear physics

Most here — modern academy PhD:s have not yet reached this pay-grade: searched for, not found —

found answer: Us. The Matter stuff Organization in our universe: the elements.

• 5·8 + 18 = 58: (»Advanced Alzheimers» or »6 of possible 5»);

• PetrieCR¦b58 = 58R(16000)^½ = 4534.196576 ~4534.20 ............ inside Petrie’s 4534.40’’ ± 0.25

• The MiUnit:

0.0254 M = [ROUND 100·(2b·[1Meter/1Inch]/R)·R^18]/10000

= 1'' ............................................................................... ¦ the MiUNIT

= (2b/R)R^18 ¦ Golden Section Constant R = (5^½ — 1)/2 = 0.618033988..

— The b — half pyramid base — can be any of the PetrieCR¦b58=4534.20 or PetrieCP¦4534.40, both apply.

• The number 18 has also a most (mildly spoken revolutionary) decisive significance inside RELATED nuclear physics — unknown to modern academic PhD:s, as it seems:

RELATED PHYSICS — TNED:

• The Atomic Nucleus from The Neutron AS: Planck Constant (h = mcr =) 6.62559 t34 JS:

• Neutron mass (1.0086652u) m

• Light-Speed in vacuum (2.99792458 T8 M/S) c

• Neutron Gravity Circle radius (1.32 Fermi) [after decay: proton radius 1.37 Fermi] r.

— The Central Nuclear Neutron massif equivalent 1818 + 18 + k ±e-masses:

— 18 is the maximum number of ±electrons that are wasted in exothermal nuclear fusions in building heavier nuclei from lighter ACCORDING TO TNED and The Neutron Square:

The Neutron Square — unknown in modern academy. Why? Try this one: Because the Modern Offspring 1800+ Academic Idea of Science was to INVENT. Not to Deduce. Result: Modern Academy CLEARLY MISSED THE ON-RAMP — to A Natural Harmonic Human Civilization Without WASTE and Killing Nature. As so proved;

— EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS + TNED = TRUE. Atomic Masses. Nuclear Physics. Related Mathematics: Cheops Rectangle. For its name origin in this production: See CHEOPS RECTANGLE name origin, unless already familiar.

MODERN ACADEMIC NUCLEAR PHYSICS THEORY

theorizes on Atomic Mass Equations by

NUCLEAR MASS DEFECT MATHEMATICS (Weizäcker equation models).

TNED DEDUCED RELATED NUCLEAR PHYSICS

relies on mathematics related to

ATOMIC MASS DEFECTS, the whole atom, based on The Neutron Square from deduced Elliptic equations. See (Sw.) introduction in The IRON TOP.

The STATUS OF THE 18:

The Neutron Square top scale number 18

— the number of expendable electron masses used by the atomic nuclei for fusion reaction energy work in building heavier nuclei from lighter

— is so, apparently says related physics, the responsible instance for outclassing the modern academy nuclear physics theory, as so illustrated based on comparing experimental results:

Compare: The Energy Law — in related physics.

Extracted comparing illustration from the Swedish edition [Comparison]. Modern academy appears to be irrevocably outclassed by TNED related atomic nuclear elementary physics and mathematics. The TNED case details behind this [1980+] history of revelations all started in mathematics on the simple but highly revelating connection bd=h², here coined Cheops Rectangle. Its lead to [LGL] Light’s Gravitational Dependency definitely opened the door to TNED: the atomic nucleus from Planck constant h=mcr: The Neutron. Then, the rain came.

REFLECTING ON THIS HISTORY it seems apparent that modern academy (1800+) built itself into a self admiring cocoon — blocking vital parts of research on the real steel natural content of physics. Because, namely, there is nothing wrong with the intelligence as such. The only here known causing fuck up agent is the seldom seen inducement in modern corridors of showing a minimum interest in its innate nature.

Compare: ”master of the universe”, the inscription on the Fields Price medallion:

»to overcome ones human limit and become master of the universe».

Only a real fucked up inducement can have such low thought upon Nature:

— During 3Gy She built the brains — to be used. Not spitted at.

Good food, it is such a joy. Who is the master? Say again. Come again.

The Atom Triangle with Differentials and Differences give further examples in comparing related mathematics with invented and consented ditto: basic concepts in integral, derivative, difference and differential mathematics.

Related Physics and Mathematics illustrates

The Modern academic ATTITUDE against NATURE:

• Light’s Gravitational Dependency— from Cheops Rectangle:

— Compiling illustration below from the Swedish edition.

——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

The (violet) central K-cell in TNED — some 4.14 T53 KG — is all there is in modern cosmology.

FOUND Best Short Example in Physics:

— Gravitational redshift in related physics apparently explains the modern academic invention of ”dark energy”. Why? Explain.

Favoring a limited cosmic mass and naming it our universe rhymes bad with the simple gravitational energy form

E(G) = mad = Fd = Gm₂²/d = G · (n→∞)m₂²/(n→∞)d. The equivalent part apparently suggests (m→∞) an endlessly (d→∞) growing mass sphere. MATHEMATICALLY that is simply but nevertheless an apparent gravitation energy equivalent expression: COSMIC ENERGY EXPLAINING PHYSICAL MATHEMATICS. Which also apparently, only by the mathematical necessity, demands THE APPREHENSION — understatement, fathoming — OF A gravity center — time independent connection TIME INDEPENDENT IDEA over infinite space — for that type: the gravitational nature of action: kinetics, mechanics. That g-center is, apparently a central g-free place, g-potentials cancel in an Origo: The natural [LGL] light speed velocity divergent propagating constant c=2.99792458 T8 M/S is conserved as certified BY A TIME DEPENDENCY, contrary to the time independent apprehensive gravitating action of the actual mathematical concept.

— Because modern academy denies such a possibility (”nothing travels faster than c”) — but apparently cannot escape its APPREHENDING nature and its apparent accompanying real steel physics — the extra gravitational redshift acting by the [LGL] growing mass from Origo — where we apparently are supposed to reside measuring on the outlook — is interpreted as an extra MOVE by some Magic FORCE tugging on the universe from the outside of it — so coined ”dark energy”. That why.

The Einstein and Schwarzchild solutions apparently frame the cocoon version of an enlighted science in humanity.

These Quests are the fundamental cosmological ones that mark a strong difference between TNED and MAC. See also in INERTIA — the modern academy necessary invention of ”inertial system” to grant — assert — the theory of relativity.

Some (Einstein) claim Newton to have invented the (concept of the) concept. But as we search for a quote, all we we find is ”Newton means that ..”, ”According to Newton ..”. Newton never mentioned the concept. Quite the opposite, as quoted in INERTIA.

Light’s Gravitational Dependency IS

• Completely responsible for the Deduction of the atomic nucleus: TNED: the rJCircle.

— Gravitation’s fundamental mass form.

All Cheops Rectangle.

CONCLUSIONS: What18

The rJCIRCLE Cheops Rectangle Golden Section Paragon geometrical math explains the Cheops Pyramid building and its inner design in quantitative detail. That is: in full concord with the 1883 Flinders Petrie measured values. So obvious as it now undoubtedly is:

TNED CHEOPS ANCIENT SCENARIO:

The Cheops Pyramid constructors knew TNED (its two main kings equations).

PROOF:

The rJCIRCLE, apparently the imperative detail in the whole building plan of the construct.

Neutron mass (m[n]) on TNED Toroid Neutron Circumscribed Volume — max neutron body density Dmax = 1.82 T17 KG/M³ defines the rJCIRCLE rJ = 198.5721548 M = 7817.80137’’ with mJ=5.975 T24 KG on the Earth mass mJ. rJ precisely envelopes the Cheops Pyramid building. Its Math Edifice’s rJCR¦b16 ideal Golden Section Cheops Rectangle/Pyramid base is responsible as A Main Geometry Constructor Agency for the above certified quantitative 1883 Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid measured confirmations.

The constructors (by consequence also) knew the TNED deduced atomic nucleus’ two kings equations:

• The TNED deduced atomic nucleus’ two kings equations explain — reveal by compositional study — that

• the atomic nucleus is a CURRENT (±e spin) CONTROLLED DEVICE.

THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS HAS A WEAK POINT — that needs electrical environmental provisions to trigger on:

• The atomic nucleus has no doubt a SELF INBUILT theoretical disintegrative KEY nature.

It Can be completely disintegrated by its equivalent innate ±e-structure in a clean ideal E=mc² energy output.

THAT BEHAVIOR, TNED says, can sometimes be exposed in (specifically) heavy lightning. And it is, by all probable means, the source to the observed so called Terrestrial Gamma(ray) Flashes (TGF). Positrons have been detected at a few known occasions (NASA10Jan2011, KASHIWASAKI2017). And positron detection (±e annihilation) is a safe indication of nuclear reactive phenomena.

So, in any case today (Jan2023):

• we KNOW, and have safe proof, that the activity exists.

• And it is so suggested — still without solid proof on our table — that the rJCircle Cheops Pyramid constructors not only knew that. The entire building with its (astonishing) precision is, what we know, an impossible task to organize for humans (for a longer period than max a week: fights, war, demonstrations, plague ..). What is needed is apparently a (very advanced, sophisticated) robot work BASED ON HUGE AVAILABLE FREE ENERGY.

See a detailed but very short AssemblyExample.

ONGOING RESEARCH

THE GAMMA PROJECT in Universe History deals with a (most) simple way to build a gamma ray sensor and how to test its function (with fair costs). It was intended to be used in experiments for detecting gamma radiation generated by controlled electric discharge — of a specific nature.

It is also good for testing gamma ray responses from cosmic radiation events (some average happening 1 per two minutes in mid Sweden using a standard PIN diode sensor).

As persistent as the researcher now is in the continuing effort to meet with progress, it is perhaps best to continue to stay in the background, not to get fried by the shiny enthusiasm sparkling out of that one.

(Works 36 hours — sleeps 4).

(That type never gives up until met with success, once scented the smell of a hidden treasure — as experienced. So hold out, and hold on — help is on the way).

A further (partly successful) treatise is given in the 5 documents listed in

DOCUMENTARY OVERVIEW 2021.

Natural Tenderness: What18

Test this for a start:

— Does it seem to you, the asker, that the present idea of TECHNOLOGY on Planet Earth by Established Enterprise is ADVANCED?

TESTING THE SITIUATION:

• Does is appear to any citizen on Earth today as illustrated THAT the present HUMAN IDEA OF THECHNOLOGY has any connection to the concept of ADVANCED?

— I don’t see any — but looting and sacking. Please share.

Around the mid 1900:s, after WWII, there seemed to be HOPE. Strong future belief. Very.

— Soon enough ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES showed up, Huge ones.

Modern academy’s foremost interest became: Killing life. Killing nature. Killing civilization.

Not by any deliberate proclamation or intention. But by The DRIFT of Not caring.

The consequence of No Nature. Nobody wanted it to be that way. Suddenly it hit us.

We didn’t see it that way from the start. We believed in TECHNOLOGICAL FUTURE.

NOT THIS ONE:

— VEGETATION — Leaf&Needle — was apparently intended — nervous system construct — for maintenance of basic biological NATURAL HEALTH CARE. — NOT for any kind or sort of industrial scale energy consumption or business profiting: NOT for Trafficking Humanity, but Developing it. Say again: — What replaces the chemical reduction? 3Gy of undisturbed natural evolution, no cuts, up to 1800. 200 years later: more than 30% reduced forest area. — »We’ll do fine with 70% for the developed 100 — we can always compensate with modern academic medical Juice». Have a nice Mad day.

CareRef: NaturalTenderness

I don’t see any.

Documented see:

looting and sacking

A29.1 UDHR10Dec1948:

1. Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

P1 UDHR10Dec1948:

WHEREAS recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, ...

— EVERYTHING ELSE IS A DEFINITION OF OPPRESSION: modern academy enterprise. Do share:

— All communities and societies in humanity, all times, all cultures, NOT concordant with the above two simple cultural LAWS, decline to primitive ideation, losing sight and spot of NATURE. Tell me I’m wrong.

— Modern academy shows absolutely no interest in HUMAN RIGHTS. Tell me I’m wrong.

Summing:

Humanity is apparently driven (1800+) — by DRIFT, not plan — into a prison. By a self proclaimed legend. Fed by a divine idea of representing the highest possible. By performing the lowest deep. »Governmental Progressive Destruction». What does it look like, other than that?

Constantly Aiming at the highest. And perpetually resulting in a constantly increasing lowest.

Nobody wanted that.

Care

TNEDreferences:

TNED ACCESSORIES — CheopsATLAS ¦ CheopsAtlasTNED ¦ CheopsAtlasGlaciation ¦ CheopsAtlasPyramids

TNED REFERENCES

THE BREAKTHROUGHS IN TNED

(Sw.: Se även [den förträffliga] sammanställningen i Genombrotten i TNED).

rJ: — What is the rJCircle?

The CHEOPS ATLAS FOUNDATION

— it is all about nuclear physics:

m_n = 1.0086652u ......................... HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS McGraw-Hill 1967

c₀ = 2.99792458 T8 M/S

r_n = h/m_nc₀ = 1.3196611 t15 M neutron’s gravity circle [‡AtomNucl]¦[‡StatDyna] — not included in MAC.

rJ = 198.5721548 M = 7817.80137’’ with mJ=5.975 T24 KG

• Planck constant h = TheNeutron = h=m_nc₀r_n = 6.62559 t34 JS:

EarthMass=mJ=5.975 T24 KG; rJ=(h/c₀)(3mJ/πm_n⁴)^1/3 = 198.5721548 M = EarthNeutronMass radius with The Neutron Atomic Nucleus as the deduced N3m20 from TNED

— Confirmations of the deduced TNED atomic nucleus (the neutron and its structural content by ±e: 1818+18+k):

The TNED atomic masses in close experimentally measured equivalence from

THE NEUTRON SQUARE — the elliptic functions/equation with atomic, not nuclear, mass defects

— not included in MAC — modern academy is completely outnumbered in this comparison

DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE AND PROPERTY

The electron scattering method, R Hofstadter (1950:s)

Collisions between spinning protons, A Krisch Scientific American May1979¦Aug1978

— physics by direct mass colliding experimentation.

NUCLEAR RADIUS (comparing scattering experiments only)

The Deuteron Secret — partly verified principle nuclear (scattering experiments) radius in HOP¦9—210

— not included in MAC — SCATTERING [mass] and LASER [light] experimental techniques have different foundations, see NRII.

Exact electron configuration

THE PERIODIC SYSTEM from Nuclear Matrix Algorithm on Kepler Momentum Quadrature (Kepler Resonances)

— not included in MAC [as it is known here].

Continuing from Kepler Resonances — same result in another way

SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS — comparing TNED-explanation of each quantum number with MAC

— additional explaining details not included in MAC.

ELECTRON BUBBLE CHAMBER TRACKS — comparing TNED-electron-math with actual experimental tracks

Point-particle charges cannot explain the tracks — but the TNED-nuclear constituents can, in every detail

The TNED-electron in absorption, reflexion, refraction and polarization

THE POLARIZATION EFFECT IN LIGHT

— additional explaining details not included in MAC — simple kitchen experiment not included in MAC.

The TNED-electron mass quantum detailed physics

THE CASIMIR EFFECT

— additional explaining details [The Electron mass quantum] not included in MAC.

The electron in matter — Continuing from the casimir effect (van der Waals forces: cohesion and adhesion)

sw. Grundbegreppen i material-hållfasthetsläran — grundämnenas materialbindningar och hållfasthet

BASIC CONCEPTS OF MECHANICAL AND MATERIAL STRENGTHS OF THE ELEMENTS

— additional explaining details not included in MAC.

PLANCK STRUCTURAL CONSTANT — how nuclides are explained to be composed

— not included in MAC.

As it seems: The Cheops Pyramid Builders obviously KNEW TNED — Universe History.

— RELATED (unless proved crap).

Comparing modern academic statements

NEUTRINO-PHYSICS

Overview

Solar neutrino problem in MAC

TNED-neutrino spectrum

TNED-neutrino radiation basics

— not included in MAC: modern academy has invented an idea that LIGHT IS MASS — although light has been proven NOT to develop centrifugal force in gravitational orbits: In related physics LIGHT HAS NO KINETIC CONNECTION AT ALL [GcQ-theorem]:

light IS massless. In TNED, neutrino radiation is pure em-radiation of a specific high frequency. When attenuated, neutrino frequencies are transferred to gamma, gamma to X-ray, and so on [all Compton Math] with lower values and longer waves. MAC-math-intelligence cannot handle that type: it has no representation.

TNED-explanation of nuclear fragmentation

THE NEUTRON FRAGMENTS — complement

Special

THE PARTICLE PROOF explaining why and how ENERGY CANNOT CREATE MASS

— not included in MAC.

SHORT SUM

— In general seen from TNED: we should not claim that modern academy mathematics and physics is WRONG. That statement does not, quite, cover the issue: it is CLEARLY PRIMITIVE compared to the function within Nature (»a Dolls House Theater»): Provable in every atomic detail, or not at all: There is no corresponding dialog.

• NATURE is SELF HEALING.

• Modern Academy is Nature Destructive: cannot live IN nature: Must live ON her. Function of A Pandemic.

Compare: HUMAN RIGHTS HEADLINES ¦ The Claim. Our History.

COMPARE THIS ATTITUDE:

— We don’t establish enterprises in Nature UNLESS WE KNOW SHE —

life, us, animals, flowers ..

— WILL NOT BE HURT.

— We are GUESTS, not emperors, in Life. Insight = Science — or not at all.

Why not, Modern Academy PhD:s?

mJref: NatCH

EARTH MASS REFERENCE — rJCIRCLE

The ½ Square Pyramid base via The k0 Connection becomes

(b=[rJ=7817.80137’’]/[k0=1.715933329]) 4556.005317’’ ~ 4556,01’’

which result gave an earlier calculated pG value (rounded)

rJCHEOPS¦mJ5.975¦pG = 1661.78’’.

rJCR¦b16 → rJ = (h/c₀)(3·mJ/πm_n⁴)^1/3 = 198.5665397062 M ¦ mJ = 5.9744931448 T24 KG

The inversion of the rJ connection — the actual mJ quantity — becomes, with the fix given rJ16 body, equal to

mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_n⁴/3 =

rJCR¦b16 = 4555.8764838817’’ → rJ = (h/c₀)(3·mJ/πm_n⁴)^1/3 = 198.5665397062 M = 7817.5803033942’’ ¦ mJ = 5.9744931448 T24 KG

5.9744931448 T24 KG.

— Some decimal limitation exists here due to a small variability in the Earth’s mass distribution along with the surrounding outer space.

— That value lies (very) close to the older international standard (1976) IAU value for Earth’s mass (here named the Instrumental Epoch Standard)

5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG. It is different from the later adopted

(date of change search for 2019, not found, see Wikipedia, Earth mass)

5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG.

As we (here) are not familiar with any independent way of deducing or showing a more precise Earth mass quantity, we have neither any arguing power of »the actual value» of mJ in the rJCIRCLE complex:

— Question would be whether the rJCIRCLE suggested quantity

5.974493 T24 KG

is accurate, or just a convenient adoption to the actual (convenient) b16 figures. We have no answer to that.

(»Modern Intellects» 2010+ show a tendency to COMPUTER MODEL the fill-ups of the dark holes of question marks that provides the future modern academic need of finding higher levels of IQ than the personal level of pay-grade seems to provide. Compare here Test1 and Test 2)

— »Ask The WallScreen». MustBuyBook. Rise Of The Machines.

Wikipedia Earth Mass:

Wikipedia (Earth Dec2019 ¦ Earth mass) specifies the mass of the Earth on a new epoch value as

mJ = 5,792 20 ± 0.0006 T24 KG (17Nov2017) — Wikipedia. Earth mass;

mJ = 5,792 20 ± 0.0006 T24 KG (27Dec2019) — without any direct or precise description of the reason for the different quantities.

Constants with Connections:

THE rJ-CONSTANTS WITH CONNECTIONS

Constants with connections

PETRIEb ¦ CHEOPS REKTANGEL III — CheopsAGW201718.ods ¦ ‡AtomNuc ¦ ‡StatDyna ¦ HOP

Some of the constants h¦c₀¦u¦m[n]¦r[n]) have been tested in another (highly) crucial (constant) test:

— The IAU experimentally measured Solar Luminosity value (3.8275 ±0.014 T26 W) was tested (UH-Oct2018) with two different constant epochs:

— the instrumental epoch (1960-1999) and the computerized epoch (2000+ [»The Computer Movie Modeling Epoch»]):

— While the instrumental epoch’s values hold (tremendously gallant), the Compu Epoch (possibly contaminated by modeling features only present in Modern Hollywood) does not make it. See (Swedish edition) The BellClear Hit with the tabled account in The TABLE.

The rJCOMPLEX:

THE rJ-COMPLEX

5.9750 T24 KG contra 5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG

— Is there any particular reason why you prefer the close Van Nostrand’s old Instrumental Epoch value

5.9750 T24 KG before the more modern value

5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG for the mass of the Earth,

with respect to the fact that it is the latter that is

stated as The New Computer Time SI unit before the last latest

[WikipediaRef ”See IAU (1976) System of Astronomical Constants”¦28Dec2019: following the link in Wikipedia only leads to general IAU organization information, no explicit information on from WHERE the value has been taken; Attempts to search for a source seems fruitless: the figure is mentioned ”all over the place”, but no references are given to from where or how. The IAU homepage neither seems to give any clue or hint where to, or how to, find information ABOUT our here decisive specific value and quantity OTHER than references that themselves doesn’t mention or refer any DESCRIPTION either.

— Maybe they don’t want the public to know .. Advanced placid place ..]

5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG, Wikipedia Earth mass 28Dec2019?

— Yes. There is. I think I have a very most prominent reason. Let me try to explain.

mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_n⁴/3

CENTRAL CONSTANTS:

u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

As suggested from the Golden Section ¦ Cheops Rectangle geometrical fit:

Using the (Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopaedia) simple referenced instrumental epoch (1960+) value for the mass of the Earth mJ=5.975 T24 KG leads directly

rJ(mJ¦5,9750) = 198,5721548 .... M ; = 7817,801370’’ ¦ (rJ/100R)² = 16000,90491:

– 0.90491. CLOSEST.

rJ(mJ¦5,9722) = 198,5411317 .... M ; = 7816,579988’’ ¦ (rJ/100R)² = 15995,90563:

+ 4.09437. FARTHEST.

to a close figure number of the type √ 16 000:

— It can be ”GoldenSectioned”-taken down to the elementary (R) Golden Section components as

√ 16 000 = √(16 · 10 ·100) = 4·10·√10 = 5·8·√2·√5

= 5·2·2·2·√2·√5 ; compare the Golden Section constant:

R = (1/2)(√5 – 1)

with a resulting main connection of the form

PETRIEb/rJ=58/100 and rJ/100R=√16 000 with a

PETRIEb = 58R√16 000 = 4534.196576’’, which is well within the Petrie given tolerances for his specified (4534.40±0.25)’, with a lowest 4534.15’’:

— the figures 58¦√16 000 holds — only with the instrumental epoch constants.

In using this rJ-form rJ=100R√16 000 we arrive at a corresponding mJ-value from

mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_n⁴/3

CENTRAL CONSTANTS:

u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

as »exactly»

mJ = 5.9744931 T24 KG which obviously is a very close spouse to the Wikipedia reported

1976 nominal more precise IAU (instrumental) mJ value of

mJ = 5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG: high 5.9778, low 5.9706 — essentially apart from the (only here designated CE) newer computer epoch (2000+) Wikipedia reported cheaper mJ value

mJ = 5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG, and which ”didn’t make it”.

— Taking the rest of the constants too as CE-values, the ”didn’t make it”- issue for the modern 5.9722 figure gets even worse, quite far from the Golden Section suggested paragon.

These 58¦16000 figures appear here only, in this investigating text, and nowhere else as far as known. And they, really, prove nothing at all from the Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid building — other than a very obvious and a very close connection to a TNED-related deduction of the atomic nucleus (The Cheops Constructors knew TNED, unless a pure random very unique coincidence). And further from there: A broader connection to a general history of a universe. It is all based on the simple Cheops Rectangle relation bd=h² with its foremost application in light’s gravitational dependency, leading to the deduction of the atomic nucleus. See (Swedish edition) TNED from the beginning.

So. It would be clarifying if the Planet Earth modern astronomical society (IAU-organization) could be more specific in its claim as reported (Dec2019) in Wikipedia

5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG for the mass of the Earth, compared to the former reported IAU value

5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG, and its close suggested exact (ev. »ancient Pyramid TNED-Constructors»)

mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_n⁴/3

CENTRAL CONSTANTS:

u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

5.9744931 T24 KG from the (element in) the Golden Section rJ=(100R√16 000)’’ where

R = (1/2)(√5 —1).

With the Golden Section enveloping the Petrie Cheops Pyramid as a preference gauge:

The instrumental epoch constant values hold, while the later new computer epoch constant values does not hold.

A specific article [Cheops Pyramid Challenges Science Academy, CUV] in the Swedish edition was made [Nov2017] aiming at clarifying the following more related content.

TNED-RELATED:

The primary J-Earth neutron body mass 6.80016 T24 KG on maximum TNED N2m20 neutron density

Dmax = 1.82 T17 KG/M³ quickly finishes from the moment of divergence-ignition on an Earth

mJ = 5.975 T24 KG mass body with present day size.

— The mJ value on the Dmax value gives size to a neutron sphere with radius

rJ = 198.5721548 M = 7817.80137’’.

— This radius precisely envelopes The 1883 measured Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid, alias

The Golden Section or Cheops Rectangle [from the unique geometrical pyramid bd=h²], as illustrated:

continued below:

Obviously something (radical) happened there (after 1976) in the IAU organization on the mass of the Earth, changing the former standard 5.9742 to the present 5.9722 (2000+: with no specific information found). But no hint or clue seems available @INTERNET explaining the revelation:

— Unrelated statements have no credibility.

IF — however 2000+ — the Planet Earth modern computer epoch’s present Dec2019 natural constants would hold with a claimed Earth mass of

mJ = 5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG

SOME EXPLANATORY POWER COULD ARGUE that the rough difference IN INVESTIGATION

[5.9750—5.9722=0.0028] T24 Kg = 2.8 T21 KG — roughly the total amount of water upon todays Earth top crust: all ice, oceans, rivers and lakes — COULD be due to a successive LEAK by time, from prehistory to present.

— That would explain the entire tight fitting enigma: from an initial 5.9750 to a final 5.9722 through a minor water-loss. So, case closed:

— The PRESENT value of the mass of the Earth IS the [2000+] new IAU value 5.9722 T24 KG. Case closed.

— The Edifice is still standing strong. MustBuyBook.

TNED replies:

— That would never happen, says TNED [The Oxygen Issue and Earth’s Primitive Atmosphere]. Why is that?

The most simple elementary gas law calculations suggest that any additional atmospheric mass content to an already given central mass body with a given mass and size, yielding a given average surface-gravitational acceleration [Earth industrial standard 9.80665 M/S²],

[compare 2 or more instead of 1 ocean mass]

only is squeezed more tightly down towards the surface ground by the body’s gravitation:

— Extra water — or prevailing water — will not escape on its own from an already given massive body.

THE OZONE SHIELD PHYSICS — TNED explains how water came to the surface of our Earth from an initial hot water steamy ammonia methane carbon-dioxide atmosphere with no free oxygen or other free single gaseous elements:

— In our TNED primitive Earth case WATER STEAM PRESSURE PHYSICS is the monitoring catalyzing agent:

— As long as the underlying Earth surface is sufficiently HOT — certifying a hot steamy atmosphere — the ”hard surface squeeze” is also most prominent. And the SUN’s Planck radiative force at the top of the compressed Earth’s atmosphere is not enough to dissociate water to oxygen and hydrogen. Only a possible small thin ”turbulent” recovering fragmenting recovering fragmenting .. ozone shield exists at the top from the the Sun’s light until the Earth surface cools so much [CCS: 650°K ¦ JBH] that the atmospheric steam begins to precipitate WATER AT the Earth ground.

From that moment the whole scenery changes: The atmosphere lightens up and extends higher up with the decreased pressure, and where the sunlight now and readily can begin to promote its (our) normal Ozone Shield Process: SOME hydrogen escapes out and away from the Earth’s gravitational influence

[partly refilled from beneath through weather erosion on the Earth’s surface crust] WHILE Oxygen and Nitrogen begins to appear freely, at first in the upper Earth atmosphere where the ozone-shield atomic dissolution and resolution circulating process works. See further [Swedish edition] The DiaSQUARE and Earth’s Organic Life.

So, in conclusion, says TNED — Do correct if wrong: faulty statements are not allowed here:

— Extra water — or prevailing water — will not escape on its own from an already given massive body capable of assuring water containment on its surface.

— No mother god loving way.

WITH a given mass to a given celestial body, and provided gravitation enough to withhold the actual elements, matter does not escape on its own from that body:

— If the initial Earth mass was 5.975 T24 KG, it so is still today [and will so continue] — apart from a discernible gaseous hydrogen leak through the atmosphere which has no influence on the bulk of the Earth mass.

That leaves us with the pending rough difference IN INVESTIGATION

[5.9750—5.9722=0.0028] T24 Kg = 2.8 T21 KG

in need of SOME other explanatory power — what, we do not know.

Awaiting an eventual (ev.) enlightenment from the responsible IAU-organization, we will continue (here) to stick to the instrumental epoch constant chart of values — as we suspect from these proving examples there is some natural CONTAMINATING COMPUTER MODELING ISSUES going on inside the scientific academy and its societies:

— Compare the two examples in CERTIFYING NATURAL CONSTANTS. While the classic instrumental epoch constants give VERY GOOD EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS WITH APPLIED TNED-THEORY on actual instrumental epoch constants , the later computer epoch constants does not hold.

So we have several provable issues pointing directly to the modern academic society and (some of) its IAU-adopted constants: the ball is theirs.

We [here] suspect a deeper explanation behind the tight fittings on the solid Edifice of the 1883 Flinders Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid than just ”fancy coincidences”. But we have absolutely no other proof than these at the present.

— The observed and here notified simple numerical figures of 58 and √16000 simplifies the whole construct down to the same basic simple elementary figures that make up the totality (NatCH):

The figure 58 = 5·8 + 18 = 58 is dissolved to the simple Golden Section basic figures as

58 = 2·2·2·5 + 18 where (orig.Dec2017.sw. The MiUNIT) appears directly through

R = (√5 — 1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section Constant

0.0254 M = [ROUND 100([1M/1’’]2b/R)R^18]/10 000

= 1’’

• (2b/R)R^18 = 2.539568549 = 2.54 cM = 1’’ = 0.0254 M with 2 rounding decimals;

Not present in modern academy society:

• THE NUMBER FIGURE 18 in TNED is also central in determining [See also EXAMPLE 1] the atomic masses as practically equivalent to the experimentally measured [Codata/HOP-table], based on atomic (not nuclear as in modern quarters) atomic mass defects by elliptic functions from the Neutron Square (certifying Experimental Physics + TNED = True);

Neutron Square

The number 18 is the maximum electron number mass defect capital related to the neutron body in all TNED-exothermal fusion calculations and processes (See [sw.] Exothermal Fusion Law):

The MiUNIT, basic:

PetrieCR and rJCR share the same ideal geometrical pyramid top — these become corresponding constants:

SUGGESTED CONSTANTS (PETRIEb=4534.40±0.25)’’:

R = (√5 — 1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section Constant

rJ =198.5721548M = 7817.80137’’

CENTRAL CONSTANTS:

u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

(rJ/100R)² = 16000,90491

b/rJ = 115.17376M/198.5721548M = 0.580009619

= 4534.40’’ / 7817.80137’’

S = 100R ....... 2 decimals = 61.80’’ = MiUNIT [see further on The Gallery HighStep]

b = 58R√16 000 = 4534.196576’’ = 115.168593 M ; lowest 4534.15; 4534.20 OK

rJ = 100R√16 000 = 7817.580303’’ = 198.5665397 M

= b·100/58

PETRIEb·100/58 = (4534.4)100/58 = 7817.931034’’ = 198.5754483 M

rJ/100R = √16 000

• R = (√5 — 1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section Constant

• PETRIEb/rJ = 4534’.4’’/7817.80137’’ = 0.580009619 = b/rJ

• (rJ/100R)² = 16 000.9..;

• 100b/rJ = 58.0009619..

• (2b/R)R^18 = 2.539568549 = 2.54 cM = 1’’ = 0.0254 M with 2 rounding decimals.

— NOTE: 5·8 + 18 = 58. Really. (»Advanced Alzheimers»). See The 1818+18+k Neutron.

In the section Certifying Natural Constants two foremost examples are given showing — proving — how these newer modern academy constant modifications lose sight of the actual scientific perspective: explaining nature, not dictating (a new) nature;

— Nature and Modern Academy does not match.

Article 27.1 in explicit: ”1. Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.”.

— Does it look like Dec2019 that The Responsible GOOGLE Administration with associated MICROSOFT CORPORATION even understands the concept?

Do share.

— Stupid enough, we thought they were here to HELP — at the same time DEVELOPING the market for IMPROVEMENT, not for greed: for KNOWLEDGE and SCIENCE. Suddenly they started to DICTATE COMMANDS, taking CONTROL over our BOUGHT devices.

COMPARE:

— »YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO READ THIS BOOK WITHOUT OUR DICTATING INTERPRETATIONS: we own the world».

Freely. Some instances really understand how to make humanity shine.

So, in order to promote further practical examples:

The problem is that a computer has no sense of personal judgment, and cannot alert the user when the latter exceeds his universal mandate: the mission to interpret, not to dictate.

Serve. Not rule.

— »MustBuyBook, said G. OOGLE and M. ICROSOFT W. Indows 10».

— »Because I have BOUGHT everything that can be bought by Me, I can do whatever The F-Word I want with IT: my computer».

At least one IPCC-example already exists exposing the technique in exactly how computers are used SEEMINGLY PROVABLY TO THE ATOM to enhance pictures of reality more adopted to inventions than deductions: See The 2010 IPCC Heat Inbrake Example.

— We are still awaiting a more profound resolution.

Besides that, the foremost TWO EXAMPLES OF NATURAL CONSTANTS expose certain issues inside the already established modern academic idea of where

(inside modern academy, of course, says modern academy, where else),

exactly, the residence of intelligence is situated.

— So what’s the point here: Whereto is the aim?

Bottom line: Elementary — experimental — nuclear physics.

Absolutely. The Nerve Center.

Test58R16000:

√ 16 000 = √ 16 · 10 ·100 = 4·10·√ 10 = 4·10·√2·√5 ¦ R√2 = √2(√5 –1)/2 = (√10 – √2)/2 : rJ = 100·40·√5·(√10 – √2)/2 ¦ 100·8·5 = 5·160 = 5³·32 = 5·5·5·2⁵ :

rJ = 2⁵·5·5·5·√5·(√10 – √2)/2 INCH = 7817.580303’’ = 198.5665397 M

rJ = 5³·5·√5·(√10 – √2)·2⁴

Testing some NATURAL CONSTANTS OF A UNIVERSE — enhanced accounted revision 27Dec2019

The PETRIEb/rJ=58/100 and rJ/100R=√16 000 CONSTANTS

R = (√5 –1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section Constant

PETRIEb = 4534.40’’±0.25

Introduction: certifying natural constants

CERTIFYING THE GENUINENESS OF NATURAL CONSTANTS BY EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS

The First Test

TNED IS EXPOSED TO A GENERAL UNIVERSAL first TEST On RESULTS FROM EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS

ATOMIC MASSES

TNED atomic masses from the Planck constant h=mcr deduced NEUTRON with its associated and (here) discovered NEUTRON SQUARE (the Neutron 1818+18+k ±e massive) through the concept of atomic mass defects[BasicCON][Deduction] with quantities calculated from elliptic equations and functions CONTRA the modern academic (MAC) concept of nuclear mass defects from ideas pertaining to ”particles inside the atomic nucleus” contrary the TNED deduced basics from the energy law: How Nature explains, illustrates and points out how to reach a definite explanation:

RESULT:

Bell Clean Hit.

The black dots show the modern academy values from its Weizäcker equations based on the modern idea of the atomic nucleus as a solid sphere with actual spinning smaller particles inside of it.

— TNED/Nature clarifies splashed water the energy law with distinct drops that physics/nature doesn’t work like that, except as a rough primitive first basic model.

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS (Nature) + TNED (Related Deductions) = TRUE.

Modern Academy nuclear physics’ theory — inventions, not deductions — is outclassed as a primitive occurrence in humanity.

CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

— Experimental physics clearly chooses TNED before MAC. Employed constants verified.

The Second Test

TNED IS EXPOSED TO A GENERAL UNIVERSAL second TEST On RESULTS FROM EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS

SUN’S PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT

TNED Sun Photometric Effect Final Test is a complete universal TNED mathematical-physical test on all the TNED-deduced parameters ending on a calculated quantity of the actual photometric effect given out from our Sun.

RESULT:

Bell Clean Hit — with the Kepler Anomalistic calculated value for the Sun mass as mS = 1.98966183 T30 KG instead of the Wikipedia value mS = 1.98847 T30 KG: rVIZ= 1025.048845.

See all the explaining details in (Swedish edition) The SunMassNOW: Thed Wikipedia referenced mS-value has no source: claimed, searched for, not found.

This FIT only accounts for with the Instrumental Epoch’s constant values, same as in Test1

CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

The later (2000+) Computer Epoch constant values dos not give a corresponding match:

Bell Clean Hit — with the Kepler Anomalistic calculated value for the Sun mass as mS = 1.98966 T30 KG — see open SpreadSHEETS manipulable for testing:

With the exact mS = 1.98966183 figure the Pfme figure becomes 3.8274990575 — a difference of 0.000000942 458 744 823 682 .. compared to the above 0.000000101:

0.000000942 ..... EXACT now CLASSIC CALCULATED ANOMALISTIC KEPLER SOLAR MASS 1.9866183 T30 KG

0.000000101 ..... shorter 1.9866 T30 KG.

— See also SUN MASS BEGIN FROM K-CELL and SunBeginMassValue.

The Computer Epoch corresponding rVIZ value is 1025.38478 giving the Kepler Sun Mass value 1.98966183 T30 KG with a Pfme value 3.8306601288 T26 W — clearly out of range:

3.8275 + 0.0014 = 3.8289 MAX. The Computer Epoch (2000+) constant values does not hold.

Out of range. Overflow.

Again:

EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS (Nature) + TNED (Related Deductions) = TRUE.

Modern Academy nuclear physics’ theory — inventions, explainable in detail, not deductions — is again confirmed NOT ONLY as a more primitive occurrence in humanity,

BUT ALSO HAS ISSUES IN (2000+) MANIPULATING THE NATURE CONSTANTS:

— To be refuted as an incorrect statement, or acknowledged as a genuinely true one.

CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

— Experimental physics BY THE INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH CONSTANT VALUES ONLY clearly chooses TNED before MAC. Employed constants verified.

RESERVATION:

— Because not all combinations have been tested (the gravitation constant G for example is known to have a poor decimal preciseness, and nobody seems to know for certain how to make improvements in the figure length) nothing here is know for certain about eventually existing combinations that might compete the above fits on the given constants by others. On the other hand, the concept of MATHEMATICAL EQUALITY seems to mandate some restrictions, not here further debated.

The TNED-collected cosmic-universal constants with respect to the famously shy gravitational constant G.

— All terms in the the right part of the connection consists of constants. And so G also should have a general broad spectrum of numerical figures after the known three first 6.67. As yet (Dec2019) nobody seem to know how.

— Calculation Note: The middle rank cannot be used as such in typ OpenOffice cells. The results just shows a ”0”. It is the bottleneck is the (mn=1.674642.. t27 KG)^14-part. Rearrange it as follows, it has been tested and it works:

As for the present (Dec2019), both r¦m(0cK) constants can only be calculated by use of a given G-value. The rest is just a Test. See (Swedish edition) THE G-SECTION.

The third test

So — »the third test» — the constants in question

CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

are very well confirmed by several independent tests of physics to give accurate confirmed quantities inside our universal electro-gravita(tiona)l environment.

Our issue here was to make checks on the connection

with Flinders Petrie’s measured Cheops Rectangle — the (here) noted rJCIRCLE seemingly enveloping the complex:

mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_n⁴/3

CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n), m(e), h, c₀ as given from the Instrumental Epoch (IE 1960-1999) HOP section.

:confirmed with an unmistakable bright shining elegance in Test1 and Test2.

— The issue lies on the rJCIRCLE radius quantity — only.

EnergyLaw:

THE ENERGY LAW — unit without parts

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 222 .. 111

— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday ..

The energy law — absolute basic physics

THE ENERGY LAW (fully explained in the Swedish edition)

— MAC uses it — but not in its full extent.

Nature illustrates herself in Principles. But Modern Academy [1800+] never even saw Her: perfect math. Perfect physics. SHE is NEVER mean to her children. Do correct if wrong. Faulty statements are not allowed here.

NO DEFINITE CONSTITUENTS — the UNIT is preserved [MIC]:

1 = (n)/(n) = (n→∞)/(n→∞) = A/A — amount has no meaning

— modern academy cannot handle this type of mathematics, see HumanityIP.

Atomic nuclei can split (MIC, mass interactive connection [conv. deBroglie’s eq.]) — as water droplets from impact — and expose a time limited existence (always ending on an electron-positron pair with following annihilation, see PairAnnihilation in related physics).

BUT Drops United DO NOT SPIN AROUND EACH OTHER INSIDE THE UNITING ELEMENT

— In fact: drops are not seen at all inside the uniting element.

In modern academy (MAC) this natural behavior has been given (invented) a TRANSPOSITION ALSO INTO the actual unaffected atomic nucleus. One speaks of ”particles inside the nucleus” where related physics (TNED) states there are none — see PASTOM, principle structure of mass (the atomic nucleus as the fundamental form of gravitation):

mass constitutes an unlimited number of mass elements constantly dividing so that no smallest part exist

m = m(n→∞)(n→∞)^–1 = (F/a) (n→∞)^–1(n→∞) = (F/[a(n→∞)])(n→∞) = m’(n→∞):

— modern academy cannot handle this type of mathematics, see HumanityIP.

— The only way to extract massless, m→[(E=hf)c^–2] pure light (heat) energy [COEI, conservation of energy by induction] from mass (the primary mass destructor E=mc²=hf) is based on a natural (cognitive) principle allowing absolutely no remaining mass particles: pair annihilation, resulting in zero spin, zero charge, zero mass.

No mass what so ever. All moments and forces in the atomic nucleus sum zero: atoms need no refill to work (Atom- and Nuclear RELATED PHYSICS’ two King’s Equations)[momentum and force]:

— modern academy cannot handle this type of mathematics, see HumanityIP.

Modern academy

especially in nuclear physics’ understanding of our basic universe,

is fundamentally far away from Nature.

Do correct if wrong. Faulty statements are not allowed here.

NoAtlantis:

— It’s not about religion. It’s about US humans.

— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 111 .. 333

— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday ..

— ATLANTIS DOES NOT EXIST.

— Yes, no. I hear you keep saying that.

— And I don’t think there is any body else these days having missed that part.

Additional indirect Strong proof:

And there is more

• Cheops Rectangle — Cheops Pyramid: TNED, The rJCircle — related physics only:

— The building (Petrie’s measurements from 1883) assumes an early familiarity with TNED (TNED FROM THE BEGINNING in Swedish):

In its most central aspect, ignoring all the editions in-between:

— A (promised [assured by the energy law]) guaranteed environmental harmonic solution to the presently most prominent human energy problem (ATA/CAT: the complete dissolution of the atomic nucleus): exact mathematically-physically deduced in detail — but is impossible to reach by modern academic standards, as ALSO explained in detail: all questions answered.

— Nature cannot be described by present established concepts in math and physics.

Modern Academy 1800+ has a strong tendency in wanting to be seen as a Commander of Experimental Physics. It isn’t. But at the present, humanity knows of no other Captain of the Ship.

SHORT:

— What’s the ”rJCircle”?

— Our Earth on a TNED-N3m20-Neutron-(h=mcr) mass density 1,82 T17 KG/M².

— Is that significant in any way besides that?

— Yes. Indeed. Very significant. But a presentation in English is not at hand. See the corresponding deduced mathematical physics in THE SPRING ANALOGY: The K-cell DETONATION in Swedish.

The rJCIRCLE part as such is more simple to present.

— See rJCircle ¦ rJCOMPLEX.

CONDITIONS: HowStart — TheEntrance:

Conditions — in analyzing the Cheops Pyramid

FROM THE 1883 FLINDERS PETRIE’S MEASURES

The Entrance

The decisive opening (entrance denotes A): there is not much left of it.

IMAGE SOURCE : 1883 Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid measurements

@INTERNET from

Right: This drawing is a [Jan2020] vertical corrected version from the source’s PetriePLATE.9:

— PetriePLATE.9 shows growing height error in the drawn values, not concordant with the specified values given by Petrie. The horizontal scaling is though an excellent matching with Petrie’s values. See how the correction was made in CONDITIONSdraw.

— Left: The inner design of Cheops Pyramid, thoroughly adopted to and so in accord with the Flinders Petrie measurements from 1883. The designations are further used in the main text to relate the different details.

PETRIE MEASURED ONLY THE REMAINING STAIRCASE MASONRY AVERAGED SLOPING ANGLE

(Pstair°) = 51° 52’ ± 2’. Se Petrie values in PetrieCH6.25.

— That angle is also the one Petrie adopted in deducing the entrance position — on the idea of an original high precision flat casing surface with help of Petrie’s measured 19th stone block course

668.2’’ over the pavement and its (suggested) relation to the entrance passage (measuring) geometry.

CONDITIONSdraw:

CONDITIONS — comparing, analyzing

DRAWINGS AND VALUES must

— m u s t —

match into the bare pixel for precise inspection and comparison;

— All differences in this topic Cheops Rectangle and Cheops Pyramid from Petrie’s measurements 1883 are (very) tight:

— And a bad drawing (skewed projection) only exaggerates the frustration of NOT getting anywhere.

Petrie’s Plate 9 — with a vertical scale correction. But the correction is NOT linear all over Petrie’s drawing, only up to the actual analyzing level: must be recalibrated for each specific vertical distance. For thorough inspection and comparison, the entire Petrie Plate 9 drawing must be redrawn with pixel exact matches to the Petrie given measured values.

— It is not known here if the vertical scale error reflects some computer scanning device skewing, or if the error reflects the original Petrie work.

See more details in NatDES.

NatDES:

NATURE’S DESIGN OF A UNIVERSE — a TNED related compilation of the Cheops Pyramid Flinders Petrie results

SCALE, NUMBER AND UNIT APPEARANCE

THE rJCIRCLE PREFERENCES WITH THE PETRIE MEASURED TOLERANCES

PetriePLATE.9 is corrupted vertically — not horizontally

THE GALLERY HIGH STEP ¦ Original 3D-drawing below right from 2017 in The STEP

a: PetriePLATE.9 — is corrupted vertically, not horizontally: Petrie given vertical values does not match the corresponding significantly drawn parts: Petrie values show lower than the corresponding drawing. The vertical error is NOT proportional — for example »by reducing the drawing by 98% as above we’re home». NO. lower parts will not [again] fit with Petrie given values. The entire drawing, correct on the x-scale, has to be redrawn altogether — vertically — if it shall be used in any kind of precise concord with the Petrie given vertically measured and text written values. See also The Corrupted Drawing on The Entrance, ConDRAW.

b: PetriePLATE.9 vertically SO adjusted 98% — on the level of the south end of The Gallery matching the actual Petrie referred values.

c: THE PART IN QUEST — not sufficient Petrie [or other sources] data are known here in settling the quarry: The GS-body paragon PetrieCR¦b58 agent advertises a P-value 2027.76’’ above the Petrie pavement zero reference height. IF — as is suggested by the GS-body — the Gallery Construct works by an ideal ArcTan½: If so, its top construction line would meet the South Wall 61.80’’ from the Pyramid vertical Centre EXACTLY intersecting the P-line value. Then the height of the Gallery TAKEN BETWEEN THE pG-POINT @d AND THE ROOF OF THE IDEAL ArcTan½ CONSTRUCTION LINE would be exactly 2027.76 — 61.80/2 — 1658.2 [or GS-suggested 1658.17] = 338.66’’ [338.63]. PetrieCH7.46 only gives a mean sum by ”therefore at half the height of the gallery, that varying from 167 to 172.” : 167 + 172 = 339”; Wikipedia (The Great Pyramid) gives a ”8.6” Meters = 338.58’’. No related precise value is known here.

d: OVERVIEW of the actual site in the interior of Cheops Pyramid — The Great Step and the observed GS-body arithmetics with a concealed MeterInch unit: 1’’ = 0.0254 Meter = [ROUND 100·(2b·[1Meter/1Inch]/R)·R^18]/10000 with b=PetrieCP¦4534.40 or PetrieCR/¦b58=4534.20 and

R=(5^½ — 1)/2.

e: Overview @e further clarified with the total Cheops Pyramid section South-North from the 1883 Flinders Petrie Measures on The Cheops Pyramid.

— See PetrieSOURCES @INTERNET.

Scaling Differences:

RESOLUTION SCALE DIFFERENCES

The difference in angle between Petries Staircase slope value

51° 52’ = 51.86666...°

and that of the ideal Golden Section Cheops Rectangle

ArcTan 1/R = ArcCotR = ArcTan [2/(5^½ — 1)]^½ as

51° 49’ 38.25’’ = 51.82729238°

is only

0.039 37 42 89° with a tangent of

0.00068 7211.

On a rough horizontal 1000 inch wide window the vertical difference will not even raise up to one single pixel (0.67p).

With some »half interfering approximation image technique» we can (at most) illustrate the difference as below:

Comparing the difference along this whole screen length (980pixels) the deviation at the end is approximately no more than 1 pixel:

— The ideal Cheops Rectangle compared to the Petrie given measures, will NOT be visible to the naked eye unless relatively large drawings are used (>20 inches). At most, not even a quarter of that is used here in this presentation.

— Anyway, we use enlargings/magnifications to illustrate the precision details with the aim of exposing the differences.

CheopsATLAS-TNED — Jan2020

innehåll: content SÖK på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök alla ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning över alla webbsidor

Universums Historia — CheopsATLAS-TNED

ämnesrubriker

innehåll

ProofCodON — PROVING THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT

TNEDtoPETRIE — HOW TNED connects to THE 1883 FLINDERS PETRIE MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID

ElawRef — THE ENERGY LAW — unit without parts

CONTENT in detail

referenser

[HOP]. HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGraw-Hill 1967

Atomviktstabellen i HOP allmän referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 s9–65—9–86.

m_n = 1,0086652u ...................... neutronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]

m_e = 0,000548598u .................. elektronmassan i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3 s7–155 för m_e , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]

u = 1,66043 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27, 1967]

u = 1,66033 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular Weight]

u = 1,66041 t27 KG ............... atomära massenheten [FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]

u = 1,66053886 t27 KG ........ atomära massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL-506W (2005)]

u = 1,6605402 t27 KG .......... atomära massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]

u = 1,660538782 t27 KG ...... atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],

CODATA rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe on Data for Science and Technology)]

c₀ = 2,99792458 T8 M/S ........ ljushastigheten i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på 1970-talet)]

h = 6,62559 t34 JS ................. Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]

[BA]. BONNIERS ASTRONOMI 1978

— Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.

[FM]. FOCUS MATERIEN 1975

[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12 band A(1922)-Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT A-Ö(1929)

t för 10^–, T för 10⁺, förenklade exponentbeteckningar — simplified notations: t for TEN RAISED TO minus and T for TEN RAISED TO plus.

MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern ACademy — etablerad vetenskap sedan början av 1800-talet

TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS — Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.

(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=m_nc₀r_n, analogt Atomkärnans Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad, vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således) också

RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.

See also TNED FROM THE BEGINNING (Swedish edition only Aug2019).

SHORT ENGLISH — TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain

(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).

TNED or Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details claim to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.

Senast uppdaterade version: 2024-03-01

*END.

Stavningskontrollerat 2020-03-26¦26Mar2020.

rester

åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se

≈ Δ Ĵ ∫ α √ π → ∞ τ π ħ ε UNICODE — often used charcters in mathematical-technical-scientifical descriptions

σ ρ ν ν π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ ω → ∞ ≡ ↔↕ ħ ℓ

Ω Φ ϕ ϕ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ ~

α β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ σ ω ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫ ≤ ≈ ≥ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓

ζ ξ

Arrow symbols, direct via Alt+NumPadKeyboard: Alt+24 ↑; 25 ↓; 26 →; 27 ←; 22 ▬

23 ↨ — also 18 ↕; 29 ↔

åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se