CHEOPS ATLAS
¦ TNED — Feb2020 — UNIVERSUMS
HISTORIA  a
production 2020I1  Senast
uppdaterade version: 20230121 · Universums Historia
innehåll
content denna sida · webbSÖK äMNESORD på
denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning alla webbsidor
NatCH ¦ CheopsATLASBegin ¦ CheopsATLASPyramids ¦ CheopsAT ¦
RESPONSIBLE: rJCIRCLE COMPLEX — THE TWO
PYRAMID AGENTS rJCR¦b16 and
PetrieCR¦b58 defines the actual physical Petrie 1833
measured CheopsPyramid — THE
FUNDAMENTAL PETRIE POINTS
BASED ON
THE FLINDERS PETRIE 1883 MEASUREMENTS — See our @INTERNET Petrie Source — Proving THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT
PROVING PRECISE CHEOPS PYRAMID QUANTITIES
THROUGH The
CHEOPS
RECTANGLE GOLDEN SECTION PARAGON rJCIRCLE
COMPLEX
— Feb2020+
THOUSANDS
OF YEARS BACK FROM HERE some established sources claim, in some parts, a
noeasyexplainable glaciation history — only over the northern Earth part.
THAT promotes a further GeoATLANTIS investigation. See special
treatise glaciation article
in this unique Feb2020+ CheopsATLAS series.
— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello ..
ello .. 222 ..
333 .. ¦ ATLANTIS ¦ GTursprunget2019 ¦ AtlantisAPPENDIX ¦ CHEOPS
REKTANGEL ¦
— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday .. A GEOATLANTIS
might EXPLAIN some elseway mentioned mysterious Northern Hemisphere GLACIATION
VARIATIONS ¦ COMPILED FOR UH 3Mar2020
• Background.
After
The rJCIRCLE breakthrough (Nov2017—CHEOPS RECTANGLE) the urge of finding eventual geological explanations was deepened.
See (Sw. ed.) ATLANTIS with a followup here on CheopsAtlasGlaciation — still investigating as long as proof of
impossibilities have not arrived. In improving the details from Nov2017 — now
with a more strict quantitative test on the two pyramid agents rJCR¦b16 and Petrie CR¦b58 — a full
delivery of Petrie matching Cheops Rectangle Golden Section constants has
arrived — see all details in CheopsATLAS. The following is an appendage with some additional
descriptions.




ASSEMBLY
Scenario WITH MODERN STANDARDS 1800+
— Martha .. Was it 5566 or 6655 ..
I’ve lost track of these The F Word numbers again ..
— Oh Henry then .. You must shape up and try to keep up ..
Now we have to start all over again, all the way from the beginning, again ..
— By the way, have you heard of
anybody, eventually, inventing any cure for the winds… Because I can hardly
control any placing at all in bad weather ..
Scenario WITH TNED
Provided
free energy and a PLAN
1
Stone Block per 10 seconds is perfectly mounted and set on each of the four
sides; a total 4 blocks per second:
— A
steady stream of MANY computer programmed air borne high tech machines travel
from Quarry to Building.
—
During the travel — as continuously communicated by the Building Crew Machines
— a 3 D next stone forming Picture is sent to the transporting train of
machines based on the actual progress, no two identically shaped stones,
forming and shaping each block exactly following the General plan.
—
When a prepared block reaches its building site, its placing is first prepared
by a Precision Mortar Spraying machine within only a few seconds: 3 already set
stone faces are mortar sprayed, and the remaining free 3 sides on each new
stone block is then — held by an air vacuum servo on three sides — gently,
exactly, smoothly and precisely PUT into place by the actual Machine in say max
6 to 7 seconds — continuously reporting its do and don’t to ALL THE OTHERS
WITHOUT QUARREL: no breaks, no mistakes, no discussions, no arguing, no
misunderstanding.
No tired legs.
Within some two months the entire edifice
is finished: 2 300 000 medium some 2 ton stone blocks on 4 per 10 seconds makes
67 days — Provided free energy and plan. 2 months. Perfect Assembly.
IMPOSSIBLE to explain by quantity
WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE rJCIRCLE complex.
TWO GOLDEN SECTION Cheops Rectangle PYRAMID AGENTS
EXPLAIN and define CHEOPS PYRAMID QUANTITIES
THE CONTRACTED
CONSTRUCT — PROOF
CHEOPS PYRAMID THROUGH CHEOPS RECTANGLE GOLDEN SECTION
PARAGON rJCIRCLE COMPLEX
CASING, TUNNELS AND GALLERY — all by exact rJCIRCLE GS Petrie tolerance matching quantities:
recurring fixed determined constants explain and prove
the construction’s vital 3 different locations.
R = (√5 – 1)/2 ¦ 16 ¦ 18
¦ 58 ¦ The MiUNIT: 0.0254 M = 1’’ ¦
Summation
The quantity results from the rJCIRCLE complex GOLDEN SECTION CHEOPS RECTANGLE
Paragon mathematical geometric structure leaves no doubt about the origin and
how to find its key:
All investigated quantities are based on The rJCIRCLE
identity
definition and its CHEOPS RECTANGLE Cheops Pyramid identification [GSbody]:
— Our Earth mass 5.975 T24 KG on neutron density 1.87 T17 KG.
Based on the TNED deduced Neutron N3m20 toroid form [The Neutron] as the Planck constant h=mcr quantity on
parts (PART
I and PART II), the TNED complex is so and
irrevocably undoubtedly connected with the Cheops Pyramid edifice:
— With the TNED associated NEUTRON SQUARE central connected neutron nuclear electronpositron mass factor 1818 + 18
+ k
the Cheops Pyramid calculated quantities — as definitions of the Petrie
measured values — prove the familiarity on several sites, types and
occasions.
The Neutron
Square elliptic equations and functions, truly and obviously defining the Atomic
Mass Defects with the correspondingly defined ATOMIC
MASSES —
practically equal to the experimentally measures [HOP]
values — modern academic nuclear theory appears to be completely outclassed —
explained in atomic detail. And more so, with a past historical record that
breaks all barriers: an early high tech familiarity proven by these
correspondences over the calculated quantities of the Cheops Pyramid, and the
obvious appearing construction PLAN following them.
In short:
— THE PROVING CONTRACTED
CONSTRUCT
plan and its quantitative explanation and definition in detail of the Flinders
Petrie 1883 measures of The Great (ancient Greek Cheops) Pyramid is
fundamentally excluded, eliminated and precluded, impossible to deduce and
build WITHOUT a basic corresponding rJCIRCLE equivalent: IN Proof by
quantity and a perfectly deducible — simple — plan once the rJCIRCLE complex
is adopted.
— The contracted construct, its plan and quantities prove
an early previously Planet Earth existing based human culture and civilized
technology — way far above this present one: destructive, nature denying.
Especially on the level of nuclear physics and its NATURALLY PRECISELY
RELATABLE deducible mathematics.
This is even more true with some prominent illuminating
respect to Flinders Petrie’s own cogitated resolution (TCA): obviously a general principal —
and principle — plan for also other pyramids in the neighborhood:
Author’s water colour drawing from earlier
periods in studying The object.
The 19th Floor — the 18th
ROOF. Mai, oh Mai.
REVELATIONS AFTER FLINDERS PETRIE 1883: THE GREAT CHEOPS
PYRAMID
PETRIE BREAKS THE
ENIGMATIC ICE
— COMPLETELY see The
Contracting Proof :
DESCENDING PASSAGE TUNNEL HEIGHT ON AN
OPTICAL/TRIGONOMETRIC 19th COURSE THICKNESS PROJECTION principle
PetrieCH7.32:
” 32. The original length of the
entrance passage has not hitherto been known, except by a rough allowance for
the lost casing.
But after seeing the entrances of the Third Pyramid, the South Pyramid of Dahshur, and the
Pyramid of Medum, all of which retain their casing, there seemed
scarcely a question but that the rule was
for the doorway
of a Pyramid to occupy the height of exactly one or two courses on the outside.
That the casing courses were on the
same levels as the present core courses, is not to be doubted, as they are so in the other Pyramids which retain
their casing, and at the foot of the Great pyramid.3
The next step is
to see if there is a course equal to the vertical height of the doorway; and, if so,
where such a course occurs. ..”.
THE
PYRAMIDS AND TEMPLES OF GIZEH, William Flinders Petrie 1883
W. M. Flinders Petrie 1883 — @INTERNET Ronald Birdsall, 200314
http://www.ronaldbirdsall.com/gizeh/petrie/index.htm
That (ProofCodON) breached more than the ice of the
complex — in this authors deducing treasure hunting reference.
What is the breaking new?
With the now (Jan2020+) revealed Cheops ATLAS mapping
quantitative proofs connecting to
The
Golden Section CHEOPS RECTANGLE math:
— The OTHER
pyramids
”.. all of which retain their casing
..”,
with the now (very) revealing early
Petrie observation that
”.. the rule was for the doorway of
a Pyramid to occupy the height .. ”, PetrieCH7.32 as above.
A strong
indication of all ancient Pyramid origin by a general
CONTRACTED CONSTRUCTION PLAN.
AS SHOWN THROUGH THE rJCIRCLE COMPLEX IN
QUANTITATIVE DETAIL:
— IF SO others built these: why not all of
them? Give us one single shiny argument against.
THE RULE (ILLUSTRATED):
— The
Entrance.
— Exactly what
are you trying to share here?
— The OPTICAL/TRIGONOMETRIC 19th COURSE THICKNESS
PROJECTION principle.
THIS:
— Obviously all other (Petrie) known pyramids (1883) were
constructed (exactly) the same way as The Great Cheops Pyramid: After ONE
(exactly) the same here so discovered in atomic detailed provable and
relatable plan:
WHEREAS THE GREAT
CHEOPS PYRAMID AS RECENTLY STATED CANNOT BE DEDUCED, UNDERSTOOD OR REVEALED ITS
PROVABLE QUANTITATIVE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING PLAN
WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING rJCIRCLE COMPLEX EQUIVALENT, SO ALSO SHOULD
COUNT FOR THE OTHERS OF THE SAME PLANNING: two independent coworking
construction pyramid agents secure an actual third physical edifice:
AT LEAST IT IS SO PROVED ON THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID:
IMPOSSIBLE TO DEDUCE BY QUANTITY
WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE rJCIRCLE complex.
No pyramid building at all — according to modern academic
scholars.
— Kill these statements — if anyone can:
These monuments are OLD — precursors to the much later
civilizations Egypt and Sumer.
And so are
all the South American Pyramids unless otherwise so proved.
Absolutely do
correct if wrong.
Petrie is
responsible for this discovered connection, provable in quantity detail in my
reference:
No human hand (Compare Assembly) has been touching the build up of
these monuments. It is or can be understood as a machine work based on
sophisticated energy robotizing sources. That was my first and only conviction
from the moment I got into the details many years ago as a first layman, no
matter the fact that we don’t know the how of it:
— An ORGANIZATION from human workers on such a monumental
edifice is beyond human capacity: no mistakes, no breaks, no conflicts, no
doubts, no discussions, no obstructions, no tired feet, only exact monotone
precision forming and placing 24/7 from a given non questionable by anyone
plan until finished.
Always seeking
a critical view. None yet found.
ProofCodON: ProCodONki ¦ Compiled
6Mar2020
THE
GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID AT GIZEH OUTSIDE CAIRO WAS BUILT BY ENGINEERS FAMILIAR
WITH THE MATH:
PROVING THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT
—
The 5253 inches vertical tunnel height and its trigonometrical/optical 19th
course thickness projection .. what?
PROOF OF AN ADVANCED CONTRACTED
CONSTRUCTION PLAN — main proof Jan2020+
THE
IGNORANT (us, until ..) could introduce an arguing debate so:
— THE
TUNNEL BREADTH is just an arbitrarily chosen measure by the pyramid engineers
to minimize any rocky vulnerability to the overall final construct: maximum
stress resistance. Case closed.
The debate had other volunteers:
— So
you keep saying. The tunnel height can be explained in quantitative detail from
the rJCIRCLE complex as a first consequence of the Golden Section Paragon CHEOPS RECTANGLE plan — see Figure
on Point B determination from The 7. In
detail:
THE CENTRAL JUNCTION BETWEEN
DESCENDING FROM CASE AND ASCENDING TO GALLERY. Cheops Pyramid.
The rJCIRCLE complex explanation in precise (exact) Petrie
measured quantities: How and why.
— The
determination of The B Point is made through
• the main pyramid agent rJCR¦b16 by
• a specific INTERSECTION
MATH based on
• specific Golden Section Paragon Arithmetics
The
basic metrics in the CONSTRUCTION PLAN’s point B determination is between the
given central ArcTan½ Line (The 7) and the two slightly different GS body
ArcTan½ paragon line vertical intersect, their vertical difference, on UPPER
and LOWER (we tested the most simple, and this is what we found, directly):
— The
yATH (Ascending Tunnel Height) parameter connects to
the Petrie observed 19th course trigonometric/optic projection principle (TCA),
further underlining the existence of a (very) sophisticated PLAN for the whole;
SIMPLE MATH on heavy structure:
RESULT:
— The
B point yATH property defines the main fundamental tunnel
VERTICAL height property (basic: 43.3696399875’’, with following):
— yATH
ascending tunnel height is the ascending ArcTan½ line vertically
intersecting difference between the GS paragons Upper and Lower positions:
—
With the pyramid agent spouse — PetrieCR¦b58 — an additional BUARM
Bpoint Upper Ascending ROOF (BUARM)
Averaged MEAN
constant
is added. These sum the yBarm = yATH
+ BUARM constant (46.9379317681’’).
— At
First: Through it, the Petrie measured (1693.2 ± 0.6) yKING floor level
(1693.1782168993’’) is identified along with the yPG point identification (1658.1652607385’’). But that is
only a beginning:
THE
REAL SHINY PROVING STEEL STUFF — the actual proof core:
—
With a final (»secure and safe sealing») PYRAMID AGENT CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT,
the two pyramid agents are geometrically pushed (TeP1) into
each other by their given horizontal bOFFSET difference (21.6799079131’’). This effect creates THROUGH
THE rJCR¦b16 agent’s DEFINED PETRIE B POINT
— or rather makes appear — a final additional PETRIE B POINT VERTICALLY
PROJECTIVELY COLLECTED sum of so »simply» and exactly deduced constants ending
up on
• The cSIDE.
And
the cSIDE — it is — is the trigonometric/optic casing (Enter)
projection of the 19th course masonry thickness at the level of the descending
entrance of The Great Cheops Pyramid:
— We
can always cast suspiciousness on a treatise of which content our insight meets
with big hungry dark question mark holes, awaiting to be filled with our more
dearly beloved familiar pets.
—
With Petrie’s own stated values (PetrieCH6.32 Row32
In Quote):
37.94
± 0.17.
—
With Petrie’s own values, for a cross checking trigonometric calculation
(Petrie’s
casing angle in PetrieCH6.24¦32: 51° 53’ 20’’ ± 1’):
37.9640590055’’.
The small deviations all lie (well) within
the Petrie given tolerance.
SO UNLESS MISTAKEN:
Modern
academic scholarly established decisions and consensus have no authority over
history:
not
over gravitation, not over electricity, not over human rights.
— In
fact: not at all.
Cheops
Pyramid was not built by ancient primitive Egyptians — definitely not around 2
500 BC.
—
That building is (as the other Pyramids) OLD. Very.
Let us consider some strong arguments
against: search for, none yet found.
ProCodONKING:
From Jan2020 — ProofCodON ¦ rJCIRCLE
complex ¦
ALL CHEOPS PYRAMID DATA FROM THE 1883 FLINDERS PERIE
MEASURES — see PetrieSOURCE
3 SITE PROOF OF recurring constants on a CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT
PROVING THE GREAT CHEOPS PYRAMID’s DISCOVERED AND SO
DEDUCED CONSTRUCTIVE FOUNDATION
Recurring constants from plan
In analyzing our rJCIRCLE complex deduced constants, the following order has shown:
— Calculating the yKING level value 1693.2’’ ± 0.6
as defined by
PetrieCH7.46
exposes a directory tree of deduced constants
all centered as deduced in the close B region
on the following resolved structure and character:
—
»Your computer is confiscated». You have no say: — »We decide what you see».
Microsoft definitely 2016+:
PICTURE COPY PRESERVES THE ORIGINAL
CLEAR TEXT ON SMALL FONTS WHICH SOME WEB BROWSERS 2015+ HACKED
OUR personal COMPUTERS to omit
IN BLOCKING AN EARLIER FREE PERSONAL CLEAR TYPE NAVIGATION. Liberty in live.
In
shorter words:
— The
parameters around the Bpoint transposes their same recurring significance on
three different sites:
• the actual B point area
• the sloping floor end and its Great Step at
the south Gallery end (Transpond)
• the Casing (cSIDE ¦ ProofCodON)
— All
these — with further — give results as equal quantitative tight exact
definitions to the measured Petrie values.
See
• DEFINING the Petrie B point
• DEFINING the Petrie measured yKING floor level
• DEFINING the LEVEL Petrie measured 19th stone block masonry course
• DEFINING the THICKNESS Petrie measured 19th stone block masonry course
• EQUALITIES
— lists of rJCIRCLE complex quantities within the Petrie given
tolerances.
THIS
deduced WORK on Cheops Pyramid has used (PetrieSOURCE) electronic calculating devices and computer programming
aid (Picture and Image handling). Without such support: Beyond the known
capacity of this author.
So: With the obviously exposed advanced
STRUCTURE of a profound mathematical level of sophistication in The Great
Cheops Pyramid edifice: Clearly the constructing engineers behind had similar
tools.
There
is only one way to refute such a resolution: denial.
— You
aim at THAT the above given proof proves an early human culture and
civilization with an established existence of a computer based technology?
—
More or less, yes. You need some concrete example?
THE REASON BEHIND PI IN THIS
PRESENTATION
——————————————————
— The
piVALUE?
—
Just by a convenient adoption in observing a close normal — see the nVALUE. Comparing the difference throughout the calculating
results shows that both are valid as parametric bases within the Petrie given
tolerances (with a slight advantage with the pi version in some instances).
THE FUNDAMENTAL PETRIE
POINTS:
The
fundamental Petrie points
CHEOPS
RECTANGLE MATHEMATICS — R = (√5 – 1)/2 = GOLDEN SECTION CONSTANT in
this presentation
AS DEFINED BY EXACT GOLDEN SECTION PARAGON ARITHMETICS
CALCULATIONS BY THE rJCIRCLE COMPLEX
All values in absolute measured MiUnit Inches; 0.0254 M = 1 Inch
The Subterranean Petrie P point :
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————————
point rJform value
full decimal 2
decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.
xP_{P} xG + 10R 4227.9960057324 4228.00 4228.0
± 2 ? PetrieCH7.36e
yP_{P} yG – nVALUE 1181.2313270982 1181.23 1181.0
± 1 ? PetrieCH7.36e
Entrance and 19th
Floor values:
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————————
point rJform value
full decimal 2
decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.
xA_{P} yA/TanPC°* 524.1043769892 524.10 524.1 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.35
yA_{P} yA + nVALUE 668.1482038706 668.15 668.2 ± 0.1 PetrieCH7.35
———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
*Core Masonry remnant Measuring Dependent
Angle — corrupted in time with erosion and removed casing/masonry:
The PetrieCH7.32 measured PC° = 51°
53’ 20’ ± 1’ ¦ yA/TanPC = 524.1043769892’’.
From the rJCR¦b16 B point
definition
in The 7 Fundamental ArcTan½ line points: With the basic construction
lines (AG)¦(AG)’ hidden inside the bulk masonry, a casing spotting
measuring physically constructed corridor demands some sophisticated minor angular
adjustments: A later measuring/revealing expedition (us, here with Petrie 1883)
must have a chance of rediscovering the vital construction points. In working
ourselves through these Petrie 1883 measured corresponding angles and figures,
we arrive at this final destination in the point B region:
The lower green line is the parallel
construction line through Fpp1 Pangle (P’A) ending on the ideal
Cheops Rectangle CHEOPS PYRAMID ORIGINAL casing surface @ point O over A. At
the vertical distance yPonB over this green lower line lies the blue actual
physically constructed corridor floor, also ending on the casing surface, but
slightly higher up, securing a spotting optical window to the Petrie
measured/calculated casing point — as seen from inside the subterranean
Petrie P point along the narrow 105 M long dark descending tunnel: .
Roughly this spotting window is on a range 1/100 relative the tunnel’s ideal 1
meter squared section.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————————
point rJform value
full decimal 2
decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.
xB_{P} xB + 18 1517.7016293661 1517.70 1517.8
± 0.3 PetrieCH7.64tab
yB_{P} yB – yBlimit 172.90450852550 172.90 172.9 ± 0.2 PetrieCH7.64tab
An example of a Rmultiple Petrie Equality (Site recurring constants):
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————————
point rJform value
full decimal 2
decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.
xD_{P} 4704R 2907.2318830795 2907.23 2907.3
± 0.6 PetrieCH7.39
yD_{P} 1380R 852.8869044749 852.89 852.6 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.39
BOTH yLEVELS ARE CENTERED ON THE PYRAMID’s
VERTICAL MID LINE:
CRAgents: = b1 = 4555.88
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— ——————————————————————————————
point rJform value
full decimal 2
decimal Petrie measured PetrieRef.
yPG (b_{1}–xB)/2 + yB–yBarm 1658.1652607385 1658.17 1658.2
± 0.6 PetrieCH7.46
yKING yPG + yBlimit
+ 50R 1693.1782168993 1693.18 1693.2 ± 0.3 PetrieCH7.46
See also on KingsMID.
RESULT
— With these examples it would be rather sensational
if there would be even one single site within
the Cheops Pyramid edifice which does NOT apply.
Please do
share.
See also in
explicit THE
PEARL LINE REFERENCE and ON
THE GREAT STEP.
Site RECURRING
CONSTANTS: ¦ rJCIRCLE
complex ¦
The
fundamental Petrie points
CHEOPS
RECTANGLE MATHEMATICS — R = (√5 – 1)/2 = GOLDEN SECTION CONSTANT relation in this presentation
Site RECURRING CONSTANTS
CHEOPS PYRAMID rJCIRCLE COMPLEX DEDUCED RECURRING
CONSTANTS
In a (first) rough overview of how the (19 specified of
34, see The Main Constants) rJCIRCLE complex deduced
constants appear on the different locations of and in the Petrie Cheops Pyramid
measured edifice, the following list of occurrences show up:
— MANY PETRIE measured DEFINING QUANTITIES APPEAR
DIRECTLY FROM RMULTIPLES.
— The rightmost column (R¦r) is programmed to show
OK
(R for Rmultiple or r for a specific rJCIRCLE
Golden Section Arithmetical/Geometrical connection)
if the corresponding value lies within the Petrie given
tolerance. If left out, it is not Petrie accepted.
It is strikingly obvious, with some (rare) few
exceptions, that a general Rmultiple quantity (very) well lies within
the Petrie given tolerances, see the R column above. This type of
(convenient) occasion, as also is seen, (hence) acts a complement to a (often)
more precise quantity with help of more advanced specific Golden
Section Paragon Geometrical Arithmetics.
— A specific example is given in The Petrie D
point: both Rmultiples
and a significant GS body intersection coordination give nearly the same Petrie
accepted figures. With some convenience, we — hence — can choose the simpler Rway
in demonstrating a Petrie rJ equality at site, if necessary: a definite
proof of a Golden Section CHEOPS RECTANGLE connection.
More examples with accepted Rmultiples on the
Petrie measured figures are compiled in the EQUALITIES section.
The Main
Constants: ¦ rJCIRCLE
complex ¦
Graphical LISTING OF
THE MAIN related and deduced from the Golden
Section Paragon Arithmetics CONSTANTS
IN THE rJCRICLE COMPLEX — all based on
discoveries from the 1883 Flinders Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid
OnRow:
RELATED
MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS — FROM THE BEGINNING
HOW TNED connects to THE 1883 FLINDERS PETRIE
MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID
SEE
also AT THE BUILT
PRECISION with
Introduction — DETAILS ON THE OUTER FORM OF THE GREAT
CHEOPS PYRAMID
FROM THE BEGINNING
Begin (from around 12):
Nature
— Mirror Law, Light’s Water
Refraction, Plane Geometry:
THE 5
FOUNDATIONAL LAWS OF MATHEMATICS — as SHOWN BY NATURE:
The Cheops Rectangle connection
appears
Nature Mathematics and Artistry:
ALL BELL DHARMA PRODUCTIONS FOR UNIVERSE HISTORY
See
also in REGULAR
DIVISION OF THE PLANE
Explaining from the beginning
HOW TNED did EXPLAIN THE 1883 FLINDERS
PETRIE MEASURED CHEOPS PYRAMID
Art and Perspective Mathematics:
THE REAL STEEL BEGINS FROM Autumn
1976
EXAMPLES OF THE APPLICABILITY OF THE
bd=h² CHEOPS
RECTANGLE CONNECTION:
— In every aspect of mathematics and
physics where a right angle triangle exists
inside any type of dense and tight
(2D or 3D) geometrical structure:
HARMONIC
TRIANGLES — COMPLEX
ALGEBRA
LIGHT’S GRAVITATIONAL DEPENDENCE — COMPARING
TNED WITH EINSTEIN’S AND SCHWARZCHILD’S EQUATIONS —
ATOMIC
NUCLEUS’ DEDUCTION FROM PLANCK CONSTANT — Planck’s Structural constant
Leading further to
DEDUCTION OF THE
ELECTRIC CHARGE — THE PLANCK EQUIVALENTS — THE KCELL HEAT PHYSICS
with some additional
And more. See continuing below.
So: What’sUp?
— Where are these naturally deduced
details in mathematics and physics
in modern academy quarters — from
around the age of 12?
I don’t see any.
What I and all the others DO see is
this:
— ”Fill in here”, ”Write here — as
we TELL you to”, ”If you don’t do as we TELL you ..”.
Very high educated population.
BASICALLY UNHAPPY UNSATISFIED and very lost INDIVIDUALS.
Profoundly aware of the natural possibilities in our wonderful universe.
Very friendly: Free Vacation in Jerusalem — most visited.
MustBuyBook.
Do correct if wrong:
— Humanity is held in a MENTAL
prison Created by the 1800+ modern academy idea of INTELLIGENCE Invented. Not
deduced.
Very High Level of Natural Tenderness. Liberty in
live.
MICROSOFT&GOOGLE WITH ASSOCIATED
2015+:
— Who invited you? And when did that
happen? Please share.
See also
Cheops Rectangle
PRACTICAL EXAMPLES IN MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS.
Continuing:
And so it came about:
The rJCIRCLE.
— Calling ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 222 ..
333 .. ¦ ATLANTIS ¦ GTursprunget2019 ¦ AtlantisAPPENDIX ¦
— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday .. A GEOATLANTIS
might EXPLAIN some GLACIATION VARIATIONS — GeoATLANTIS NORTHERN HEMISPHERE
GLACIATION VARIATIONS.
What18: — OFK — Compiled for UD Jan2020 — ProvingThe
19th floor ¦
— As
already noted: Not much in this presentation is known in modern academic
quarters.
FLOOR
19 AND ROOF 18 — All atomic and nuclear physics
SEE
ALSO FROM NatCH AND rJ — THE NEUTRON SQUARE: OFK = m_{D}_{max}18 — it is all
about RELATED — 100% explainable — nuclear physics: IT connects C12/12
as the atomic mass uunit — universal TNED RELATED PHYSICS experimentally verified definition of the atomic masses —
OR: what modern academy missed completely:
WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT 18? [OffsetFactorK]
IF X
WOULD BE VERY SPECIAL IN NATURE — MATHEMATICS AND PHYSICS — WE WOULD CHOSE IT
FOR EMPHASIZING ENDS
— especially
if the expedition aims at certifying a familiarity with basic elementary most
simple nuclear physics
Most here — modern academy PhD:s have not yet reached this paygrade:
searched for, not found —
found answer: Us. The Matter stuff
Organization in our universe: the
elements.
•
5·8 + 18 = 58: (»Advanced Alzheimers» or »6 of possible 5»);
•
PetrieCR¦b58 = 58R(16000)^½ = 4534.196576
~4534.20 ............ inside
Petrie’s 4534.40’’ ± 0.25
•
The MiUnit:
0.0254 M = [ROUND 100·(2b·[1Meter/1Inch]/R)·R^18]/10000
=
1'' ............................................................................... ¦ the MiUNIT
=
(2b/R)R^18 ¦ Golden Section
Constant R = (5^½ — 1)/2 = 0.618033988..
— The b — half pyramid
base — can be any of the PetrieCR¦b58=4534.20 or PetrieCP¦4534.40, both apply.
•
The number 18 has also a most (mildly spoken
revolutionary) decisive significance inside RELATED nuclear physics — unknown to
modern academic PhD:s, as it seems:
RELATED PHYSICS
— TNED:
• The
Atomic Nucleus from The Neutron AS: Planck Constant (h =
mcr =) 6.62559 t34 JS:
• Neutron mass (1.0086652u) m
• LightSpeed in
vacuum (2.99792458 T8 M/S) c
• Neutron Gravity
Circle radius (1.32 Fermi) [after decay: proton radius 1.37 Fermi] r.
— The Central Nuclear Neutron massif
equivalent 1818 + 18
+ k ±emasses:
— 18 is the maximum number of ±electrons
that are wasted in exothermal nuclear fusions in building heavier nuclei from lighter ACCORDING TO TNED and The Neutron Square:
The Neutron Square — unknown in modern academy. Why? Try this
one: Because the Modern Offspring 1800+ Academic Idea of Science was to
INVENT. Not to Deduce. Result: Modern Academy CLEARLY MISSED THE ONRAMP —
to A Natural Harmonic Human Civilization Without WASTE and Killing Nature. As
so proved;
— EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS + TNED =
TRUE. Atomic
Masses. Nuclear Physics. Related
Mathematics: Cheops
Rectangle. For its name origin in this production:
See CHEOPS RECTANGLE name origin, unless already
familiar.
MODERN ACADEMIC NUCLEAR PHYSICS THEORY
theorizes on Atomic Mass Equations
by
NUCLEAR MASS DEFECT
MATHEMATICS (Weizäcker
equation models).
TNED DEDUCED RELATED NUCLEAR PHYSICS
relies on mathematics related to
ATOMIC MASS DEFECTS, the whole atom, based
on The Neutron Square from deduced Elliptic equations. See (Sw.)
introduction in The
IRON TOP.
The STATUS OF THE 18:
The Neutron Square top scale number
18
— the number of expendable electron
masses used by the atomic nuclei for fusion reaction energy work in building
heavier nuclei from lighter
— is so, apparently says related
physics, the responsible instance for outclassing the modern academy nuclear
physics theory, as so illustrated based on comparing experimental results:
Compare: The Energy Law — in related
physics.
Extracted comparing illustration
from the Swedish edition [Comparison]. Modern academy
appears to be irrevocably outclassed by TNED related atomic nuclear elementary physics
and mathematics. The TNED case details behind this [1980+] history
of revelations all started in mathematics on the simple but highly revelating connection
bd=h², here coined Cheops Rectangle. Its lead to [LGL] Light’s Gravitational Dependency definitely
opened the door to TNED: the atomic nucleus from Planck constant h=mcr: The
Neutron. Then, the rain came.
REFLECTING ON THIS HISTORY it seems
apparent that modern academy (1800+) built itself into a self admiring cocoon —
blocking vital parts of research on the real steel natural content of physics.
Because, namely, there is nothing wrong with the intelligence as such. The only
here known causing fuck up agent is the
seldom seen inducement in modern corridors of showing a minimum interest in its
innate nature.
Compare: ”master
of the universe”, the inscription on the Fields Price
medallion:
»to overcome ones human limit and
become master of the universe».
Only a real fucked up inducement can have such low thought upon Nature:
— During 3Gy She built the brains —
to be used. Not spitted at.
Good food, it is such a joy. Who is the master? Say again. Come again.
The Atom
Triangle with Differentials
and Differences give further examples in comparing related
mathematics with invented and consented ditto: basic concepts in integral, derivative,
difference and differential mathematics.
Related Physics and Mathematics illustrates
The Modern academic ATTITUDE against NATURE:
•
Light’s Gravitational Dependency— from Cheops Rectangle:
— Compiling
illustration below from the Swedish edition.
——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————
The (violet) central Kcell in TNED — some 4.14 T53 KG — is all there is in modern cosmology.
FOUND Best Short Example in
Physics:
— Gravitational redshift in related physics apparently explains
the modern academic invention of ”dark energy”. Why? Explain.
Favoring a limited cosmic mass
and naming it our universe rhymes bad with the simple gravitational
energy form
E(G) = mad = Fd = Gm_{2}²/d = G · (n→∞)m_{2}²/(n→∞)d.
The equivalent part
apparently suggests (m→∞) an endlessly (d→∞) growing mass
sphere. MATHEMATICALLY that is simply but nevertheless an apparent
gravitation energy equivalent expression: COSMIC ENERGY EXPLAINING PHYSICAL MATHEMATICS. Which also apparently, only by the mathematical necessity,
demands THE APPREHENSION — understatement,
fathoming — OF A gravity center — time independent connection TIME
INDEPENDENT IDEA over infinite space — for that type: the gravitational
nature of action: kinetics, mechanics. That gcenter is, apparently a central
gfree place, gpotentials cancel in an Origo: The natural [LGL] light speed velocity divergent
propagating constant c=2.99792458 T8 M/S is conserved as certified BY A TIME
DEPENDENCY, contrary to the time independent apprehensive gravitating action of
the actual mathematical concept.
— Because modern academy denies such a possibility (”nothing travels faster than c”) — but apparently cannot
escape its APPREHENDING nature and its apparent accompanying real
steel physics — the extra gravitational redshift acting by the [LGL] growing mass from Origo — where we apparently are supposed to reside measuring on the outlook —
is interpreted as an extra MOVE by some Magic FORCE tugging on the universe
from the outside of it — so coined ”dark energy”. That why.
The Einstein and Schwarzchild
solutions apparently frame the cocoon version of an enlighted science in
humanity.
These Quests are the fundamental
cosmological ones that mark a strong difference between TNED and MAC. See also in INERTIA — the modern academy necessary
invention of ”inertial system” to grant — assert — the theory of relativity.
Some (Einstein) claim Newton to have invented the (concept of the)
concept. But as we search for a quote, all we we find is ”Newton means that ..”,
”According to Newton ..”. Newton never mentioned the concept. Quite the
opposite, as quoted in INERTIA.
Light’s Gravitational Dependency IS
• Completely responsible for the Deduction of
the atomic nucleus: TNED: the rJCircle.
— Gravitation’s
fundamental mass form.
All Cheops
Rectangle.
CONCLUSIONS: What18
The rJCIRCLE Cheops
Rectangle Golden Section Paragon geometrical math explains the Cheops Pyramid building and its inner
design in quantitative detail. That is: in full concord with the 1883 Flinders
Petrie measured values. So obvious as it now undoubtedly is:
TNED CHEOPS ANCIENT SCENARIO:
The Cheops
Pyramid constructors knew TNED (its two main
kings equations).
PROOF:
The rJCIRCLE, apparently the imperative detail in the whole
building plan of the construct.
Neutron mass
(m[n]) on TNED Toroid Neutron
Circumscribed Volume — max neutron body density Dmax = 1.82 T17 KG/M³ defines the rJCIRCLE rJ = 198.5721548 M = 7817.80137’’ with mJ=5.975 T24 KG on the Earth mass mJ. rJ precisely
envelopes the Cheops Pyramid building. Its Math Edifice’s rJCR¦b16 ideal Golden Section Cheops
Rectangle/Pyramid base is responsible as A Main Geometry Constructor Agency for
the above certified quantitative 1883 Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid measured confirmations.
The
constructors (by consequence also) knew the TNED deduced atomic nucleus’ two
kings equations:
• The TNED deduced atomic nucleus’ two kings equations
explain — reveal by compositional study — that
• the atomic nucleus is a CURRENT (±e spin)
CONTROLLED DEVICE.
THE ATOMIC
NUCLEUS HAS A WEAK POINT — that needs electrical environmental provisions to
trigger on:
• The atomic nucleus has no doubt a SELF
INBUILT theoretical disintegrative KEY nature.
It Can be completely disintegrated by its equivalent innate ±estructure in a clean ideal E=mc² energy output.
THAT BEHAVIOR,
TNED says, can sometimes be exposed in (specifically) heavy lightning. And it
is, by all probable means, the source to the observed so called Terrestrial
Gamma(ray) Flashes (TGF). Positrons have been detected at a few known occasions
(NASA10Jan2011, KASHIWASAKI2017). And positron detection (±e annihilation)
is a safe indication of nuclear reactive phenomena.
So, in any case today (Jan2023):
• we KNOW, and have safe proof, that the
activity exists.
• And it is so suggested — still without solid
proof on our table — that the rJCircle Cheops Pyramid constructors not only
knew that. The entire building with its (astonishing) precision is, what we
know, an impossible task to organize for humans (for a longer period than max a
week: fights, war, demonstrations, plague ..). What is needed is apparently a (very
advanced, sophisticated) robot work BASED ON HUGE AVAILABLE FREE ENERGY.
See a detailed but very short AssemblyExample.
ONGOING RESEARCH
THE GAMMA PROJECT in Universe History deals with a (most)
simple way to build a gamma ray sensor and how to test its function (with fair
costs). It was intended to be used in experiments for detecting gamma radiation
generated by controlled electric discharge — of a specific nature.
It is also good for testing gamma ray
responses from cosmic radiation events (some average happening 1 per two minutes
in mid Sweden using a standard PIN diode sensor).
As persistent
as the researcher now is in the continuing effort to meet with progress, it is
perhaps best to continue to stay in the background, not to get fried by the
shiny enthusiasm sparkling out of that one.
(Works 36 hours
— sleeps 4).
(That type
never gives up until met with success, once scented the smell of a hidden
treasure — as experienced. So hold out, and hold on — help is on the way).
A further (partly successful) treatise is
given in the 5 documents listed in
Natural Tenderness:
What18
Test this for a start:
— Does it seem to you, the asker,
that the present idea of TECHNOLOGY on Planet Earth by Established Enterprise
is ADVANCED?
TESTING THE SITIUATION:
•
Does is appear to any citizen on Earth today as illustrated THAT the
present HUMAN IDEA OF THECHNOLOGY has any connection to the concept of
ADVANCED?
— I don’t see any — but looting and
sacking. Please share.
Around the mid 1900:s, after WWII,
there seemed to be HOPE. Strong future belief. Very.
— Soon enough ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
showed up, Huge ones.
Modern academy’s foremost interest
became: Killing life. Killing nature. Killing civilization.
Not by any deliberate proclamation
or intention. But by The DRIFT of Not caring.
The consequence of No Nature. Nobody
wanted it to be that way. Suddenly it hit us.
We didn’t see it that way from the
start. We believed in TECHNOLOGICAL FUTURE.
NOT THIS ONE:
— VEGETATION — Leaf&Needle — was
apparently intended — nervous system construct — for maintenance of basic
biological NATURAL HEALTH CARE. — NOT for any kind or sort of industrial scale
energy consumption or business profiting: NOT for Trafficking Humanity, but
Developing it. Say again: — What replaces the chemical reduction? 3Gy of
undisturbed natural evolution, no cuts, up to 1800. 200 years later: more than
30% reduced forest area. — »We’ll do fine with 70% for the developed 100 — we
can always compensate with modern academic medical Juice». Have a nice Mad day.
CareRef: NaturalTenderness
I don’t see any.
Documented see:
looting and sacking
1.
Everyone has duties to the community in which
alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.
WHEREAS
recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members
of the human family is the foundation of
freedom, justice and peace in the world, ...
—
EVERYTHING ELSE IS A DEFINITION OF OPPRESSION: modern academy enterprise. Do
share:
—
All communities and societies in humanity, all times, all cultures, NOT
concordant with the above two simple cultural LAWS, decline to primitive
ideation, losing sight and spot of NATURE. Tell me I’m wrong.
—
Modern academy shows absolutely no interest in HUMAN RIGHTS. Tell me I’m wrong.
Summing:
Humanity is apparently driven (1800+)
— by DRIFT, not plan — into a prison. By a self proclaimed legend. Fed by a divine
idea of representing the highest possible. By performing the lowest deep. »Governmental
Progressive Destruction». What does it look like, other than that?
Constantly Aiming at the highest.
And perpetually resulting in a constantly increasing lowest.
Nobody wanted that.
TNED
ACCESSORIES — CheopsATLAS ¦ CheopsAtlasTNED ¦ CheopsAtlasGlaciation ¦
CheopsAtlasPyramids
TNED REFERENCES
THE BREAKTHROUGHS IN TNED
(Sw.: Se även [den förträffliga]
sammanställningen i Genombrotten
i TNED).
rJ: — What is the rJCircle?
The CHEOPS ATLAS
FOUNDATION
— it is all about nuclear physics:
m_{n} = 1.0086652u ......................... HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS McGrawHill
1967
c_{0} = 2.99792458 T8 M/S
r_{n} =
h/m_{n}c_{0} = 1.3196611 t15 M neutron’s
gravity circle [‡AtomNucl]¦[‡StatDyna] — not included in MAC.
rJ = 198.5721548 M = 7817.80137’’
with mJ=5.975 T24 KG
• Planck
constant h = TheNeutron = h=m_{n}c_{0}r_{n}
= 6.62559 t34 JS:
EarthMass=mJ=5.975 T24 KG; rJ=(h/c_{0})(3mJ/πm_{n}^{4})^{1/3}
= 198.5721548 M = EarthNeutronMass radius with The Neutron Atomic Nucleus as
the deduced N3m20 from TNED
— Confirmations of the deduced TNED atomic nucleus (the neutron and
its structural content by ±e: 1818+18+k):
The
TNED atomic masses in close experimentally measured equivalence
from
THE
NEUTRON SQUARE — the elliptic functions/equation with atomic, not nuclear, mass
defects
— not included in MAC — modern academy is completely
outnumbered in this comparison
DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE AND PROPERTY
The electron scattering method, R Hofstadter (1950:s)
Collisions between spinning protons, A Krisch Scientific American
May1979¦Aug1978
— physics by direct mass colliding experimentation.
NUCLEAR RADIUS (comparing scattering experiments only)
The
Deuteron Secret — partly verified
principle nuclear (scattering experiments) radius in HOP¦9—210
— not included in MAC — SCATTERING [mass] and LASER
[light] experimental techniques have different foundations, see NRII.
Exact electron configuration
THE
PERIODIC SYSTEM from Nuclear Matrix Algorithm on Kepler Momentum Quadrature
(Kepler Resonances)
— not included in MAC [as it is known here].
Continuing from Kepler Resonances — same result in
another way
SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS — comparing TNEDexplanation of
each quantum number with MAC
— additional explaining details not included in MAC.
ELECTRON BUBBLE CHAMBER TRACKS — comparing TNEDelectronmath
with actual experimental tracks
Pointparticle charges cannot explain the tracks — but
the TNEDnuclear constituents can, in every detail
The TNEDelectron in absorption, reflexion, refraction
and polarization
THE
POLARIZATION EFFECT IN LIGHT
— additional explaining details not included in MAC
— simple kitchen experiment not included in MAC.
The TNEDelectron mass quantum detailed physics
— additional explaining details [The Electron mass quantum]
not included in MAC.
The electron in matter —
Continuing from the casimir effect (van der Waals forces: cohesion and
adhesion)
sw. Grundbegreppen i
materialhållfasthetsläran — grundämnenas materialbindningar och hållfasthet
BASIC
CONCEPTS OF MECHANICAL AND MATERIAL STRENGTHS OF THE ELEMENTS
— additional explaining details not included in MAC.
PLANCK STRUCTURAL CONSTANT — how nuclides are explained to be composed
— not included in MAC.
As it seems: The
Cheops Pyramid Builders obviously KNEW TNED — Universe
History.
— RELATED (unless proved crap).
Comparing
modern academic statements
NEUTRINOPHYSICS
TNEDneutrino radiation basics
— not included in MAC: modern academy has invented an
idea that LIGHT IS MASS — although light has been proven NOT to develop
centrifugal force in gravitational orbits: In related physics LIGHT HAS NO
KINETIC CONNECTION AT ALL [GcQtheorem]:
light IS massless. In TNED, neutrino radiation
is pure emradiation of a specific high frequency. When attenuated, neutrino
frequencies are transferred to gamma, gamma to Xray, and so on [all Compton
Math] with lower values and longer waves.
MACmathintelligence cannot handle that type: it has no representation.
TNEDexplanation
of nuclear fragmentation
THE NEUTRON FRAGMENTS — complement
Special
THE PARTICLE PROOF explaining why and how ENERGY
CANNOT CREATE MASS
— not included in MAC.
SHORT SUM
— In
general seen from TNED: we
should not claim that modern academy mathematics and physics is WRONG. That
statement does not, quite, cover the issue: it is CLEARLY
PRIMITIVE compared to the
function within Nature (»a Dolls House Theater»): Provable in every atomic
detail, or not at all: There is no corresponding dialog.
• NATURE is SELF HEALING.
• Modern Academy is Nature Destructive: cannot
live IN nature: Must live ON her. Function of A Pandemic.
Compare: HUMAN
RIGHTS HEADLINES ¦ The Claim.
Our History.
COMPARE
THIS ATTITUDE:
— We
don’t establish enterprises in Nature UNLESS WE KNOW SHE —
life, us, animals, flowers ..
—
WILL NOT BE HURT.
— We
are GUESTS, not emperors, in Life. Insight = Science — or not at all.
Why
not, Modern Academy PhD:s?
mJref: NatCH
EARTH MASS REFERENCE — rJCIRCLE
The ½ Square Pyramid base via The k0 Connection becomes
(b=[rJ=7817.80137’’]/[k0=1.715933329])
4556.005317’’ ~ 4556,01’’
which result gave an earlier
calculated pG value (rounded)
rJCHEOPS¦mJ5.975¦pG = 1661.78’’.
rJCR¦b16
→ rJ = (h/c_{0})(3·mJ/πm_{n}^{4})^{1/3} =
198.5665397062 M ¦ mJ = 5.9744931448 T24 KG
The inversion of the rJ connection —
the actual mJ quantity — becomes, with the fix given rJ16 body, equal to
mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_{n}^{4}/3 =
rJCR¦b16 = 4555.8764838817’’ → rJ = (h/c_{0})(3·mJ/πm_{n}^{4})^{1/3} =
198.5665397062 M = 7817.5803033942’’ ¦ mJ = 5.9744931448 T24 KG
5.9744931448 T24 KG.
—
Some decimal limitation exists here due to a small variability in the Earth’s
mass distribution along with the surrounding outer space.
— That value lies (very) close to
the older international standard (1976) IAU value for Earth’s mass (here named
the Instrumental Epoch Standard)
5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG. It is
different from the later adopted
(date of change search for 2019, not found, see Wikipedia,
Earth mass)
5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG.
As we (here) are not familiar with
any independent way of deducing or showing a more precise Earth mass quantity,
we have neither any arguing power of »the actual value» of mJ in the rJCIRCLE
complex:
— Question would be whether the rJCIRCLE suggested
quantity
5.974493 T24 KG
is accurate, or just a convenient
adoption to the actual (convenient) b16 figures. We have no answer to that.
(»Modern Intellects» 2010+ show a tendency to COMPUTER MODEL the
fillups of the dark holes of question marks that provides the future modern
academic need of finding higher levels of IQ than the personal level of
paygrade seems to provide. Compare here Test1 and Test 2)
— »Ask The WallScreen». MustBuyBook.
Rise Of The Machines.
Wikipedia (Earth Dec2019 ¦ Earth mass) specifies the
mass of the Earth on a new epoch value as
mJ = 5,792 20 ± 0.0006 T24 KG (17Nov2017) — Wikipedia.
Earth mass;
mJ = 5,792 20 ± 0.0006 T24 KG (27Dec2019) — without any direct or
precise description of the reason for the different quantities.
THE rJCONSTANTS WITH
CONNECTIONS
Constants with connections
PETRIEb ¦ CHEOPS REKTANGEL III — CheopsAGW201718.ods
¦ ‡AtomNuc ¦ ‡StatDyna
¦ HOP
Some of the constants h¦c_{0}¦u¦m[n]¦r[n])
have been tested in another (highly) crucial (constant) test:
— The IAU experimentally measured
Solar Luminosity value (3.8275 ±0.014 T26 W) was tested (UHOct2018) with two
different constant epochs:
— the instrumental epoch (19601999) and the
computerized epoch (2000+ [»The Computer Movie Modeling
Epoch»]):
— While the instrumental epoch’s
values hold (tremendously gallant), the Compu Epoch (possibly contaminated by
modeling features only present in Modern Hollywood) does not make it. See
(Swedish edition) The
BellClear Hit with the tabled account in The
TABLE.
THE rJCOMPLEX
5.9750 T24 KG contra 5.9722 ± 0.0006
T24 KG
— Is there any particular reason why
you prefer the close Van Nostrand’s old Instrumental Epoch value
5.9750 T24 KG before the more modern
value
5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG for the mass
of the Earth,
with respect to the fact that it is
the latter that is
stated as The New Computer Time SI
unit before the last latest
[WikipediaRef
”See IAU (1976) System of Astronomical Constants”¦28Dec2019: following the link
in Wikipedia only leads to general IAU organization information, no explicit
information on from WHERE the value has been taken; Attempts to search for a
source seems fruitless: the figure is mentioned ”all over the place”, but no
references are given to from where or how. The IAU homepage neither seems to
give any clue or hint where to, or how to, find information ABOUT our here
decisive specific value and quantity OTHER than references that themselves
doesn’t mention or refer any DESCRIPTION either.
— Maybe they
don’t want the public to know .. Advanced placid place ..]
5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG, Wikipedia
Earth mass 28Dec2019?
— Yes. There is. I think I have a
very most prominent reason. Let me try to explain.
mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_{n}^{4}/3
CENTRAL CONSTANTS:
u, m(n), m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
As suggested from the Golden Section
¦ Cheops Rectangle geometrical fit:
Using the (Van Nostrand’s Scientific
Encyclopaedia) simple referenced instrumental epoch (1960+) value for the mass
of the Earth mJ=5.975 T24 KG leads directly
rJ(mJ¦5,9750) = 198,5721548 .... M ; = 7817,801370’’ ¦ (rJ/100R)^{2} = 16000,90491:
– 0.90491. CLOSEST.
rJ(mJ¦5,9722) = 198,5411317 .... M ; = 7816,579988’’ ¦ (rJ/100R)^{2} = 15995,90563:
+ 4.09437. FARTHEST.
to a close figure number of the type
√ 16 000:
— It can be ”GoldenSectioned”taken
down to the elementary (R) Golden Section components as
√
16 000 = √(16 · 10
·100) = 4·10·√10 = 5·8·√2·√5
=
5·2·2·2·√2·√5 ; compare the Golden Section constant:
R =
(1/2)(√5 – 1)
with a resulting main connection of
the form
PETRIEb/rJ=58/100 and rJ/100R=√16
000 with a
PETRIEb = 58R√16 000 =
4534.196576’’, which is well within the Petrie given tolerances for his
specified (4534.40±0.25)’, with a lowest 4534.15’’:
— the figures 58¦√16 000 holds
— only with the instrumental epoch constants.
In using this rJform
rJ=100R√16 000 we arrive at a corresponding mJvalue from
mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_{n}^{4}/3
CENTRAL CONSTANTS:
u, m(n), m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
as
»exactly»
mJ = 5.9744931 T24 KG which
obviously is a very close spouse to the Wikipedia reported
1976 nominal more precise IAU
(instrumental) mJ value of
mJ = 5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG:
high 5.9778, low 5.9706 — essentially apart from the (only here designated CE)
newer computer epoch (2000+) Wikipedia reported cheaper mJ value
mJ = 5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG,
and which ”didn’t make it”.
— Taking the rest of the constants too
as CEvalues, the ”didn’t make it” issue for the modern 5.9722 figure gets
even worse, quite far from the Golden Section suggested paragon.
These 58¦16000 figures appear here
only, in this investigating text, and nowhere else as far as known. And they,
really, prove nothing at all from the Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid building —
other than a very obvious and a very close connection to a TNEDrelated deduction of the atomic
nucleus (The Cheops Constructors knew TNED, unless a pure random very unique
coincidence). And further from there: A broader connection to a general history
of a universe. It is all based on the simple Cheops
Rectangle relation bd=h² with its foremost
application in light’s
gravitational dependency, leading to the deduction of the
atomic nucleus. See (Swedish edition) TNED from the
beginning.
So. It would be clarifying if the
Planet Earth modern astronomical society (IAUorganization) could be more
specific in its claim as reported (Dec2019) in Wikipedia
5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG for
the mass of the Earth, compared to the former reported IAU value
5.9742 ± 0.0036 T24 KG, and
its close suggested exact (ev. »ancient Pyramid TNEDConstructors»)
mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_{n}^{4}/3
CENTRAL CONSTANTS:
u, m(n), m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
5.9744931 T24 KG from the
(element in) the Golden Section rJ=(100R√16 000)’’ where
R = (1/2)(√5 —1).
With the Golden Section enveloping the
Petrie Cheops Pyramid as a preference gauge:
The instrumental epoch constant values
hold, while the later new computer epoch constant values does not hold.
A specific article [Cheops Pyramid Challenges Science Academy, CUV] in the
Swedish edition was made [Nov2017] aiming at clarifying the following more
related content.
TNEDRELATED:
The primary JEarth neutron body
mass 6.80016
T24 KG on maximum TNED N2m20 neutron
density
Dmax = 1.82 T17
KG/M³ quickly finishes from the moment of divergenceignition on an Earth
mJ = 5.975 T24 KG mass body with
present day size.
— The mJ value on the Dmax value
gives size to a neutron sphere with radius
rJ = 198.5721548 M = 7817.80137’’.
— This radius precisely envelopes The 1883 measured
Flinders Petrie Cheops Pyramid, alias
The Golden Section or Cheops
Rectangle [from the
unique geometrical pyramid bd=h²], as illustrated:
continued below:
Obviously something (radical)
happened there (after 1976) in the IAU organization on the mass of the Earth,
changing the former standard 5.9742 to the present 5.9722 (2000+:
with no specific information found). But no hint or clue seems available
@INTERNET explaining the revelation:
— Unrelated statements have no
credibility.
IF — however 2000+ — the Planet
Earth modern computer epoch’s present Dec2019 natural constants would hold with
a claimed Earth mass of
mJ = 5.9722 ± 0.0006 T24 KG
SOME EXPLANATORY POWER COULD ARGUE
that the rough difference IN INVESTIGATION
[5.9750—5.9722=0.0028] T24 Kg = 2.8
T21 KG — roughly the total
amount of water upon todays Earth top crust: all ice,
oceans, rivers and lakes — COULD be due to a successive LEAK by time, from
prehistory to present.
— That would explain the entire
tight fitting enigma: from an initial 5.9750 to a final 5.9722 through a minor
waterloss. So, case closed:
— The PRESENT value of the mass of
the Earth IS the [2000+] new IAU value 5.9722 T24 KG. Case closed.
— The Edifice is still standing
strong. MustBuyBook.
TNED replies:
— That would never happen, says TNED
[The Oxygen Issue and Earth’s Primitive Atmosphere]. Why is that?
The most simple elementary gas law
calculations suggest that any additional atmospheric mass content to an already
given central mass body with a given mass and size, yielding a given average
surfacegravitational acceleration [Earth industrial standard 9.80665 M/S²],
[compare 2 or more instead of 1 ocean mass]
only is squeezed more tightly down
towards the surface ground by the body’s gravitation:
— Extra water — or prevailing water
— will not escape on its own from an already given massive body.
THE
OZONE SHIELD PHYSICS — TNED explains how water came to the
surface of our Earth from an initial hot water steamy ammonia methane
carbondioxide atmosphere with no free oxygen or other free single gaseous
elements:
— In our TNED primitive Earth case WATER STEAM
PRESSURE PHYSICS is the monitoring catalyzing agent:
— As long as the underlying Earth
surface is sufficiently HOT — certifying a hot steamy atmosphere — the ”hard
surface squeeze” is also most prominent. And the SUN’s Planck radiative force
at the top of the compressed Earth’s atmosphere is not enough to dissociate
water to oxygen and hydrogen. Only a possible small thin ”turbulent” recovering
fragmenting recovering fragmenting .. ozone shield exists at the top from the
the Sun’s light until the Earth surface cools so much [CCS: 650°K ¦ JBH] that the
atmospheric steam begins to precipitate WATER AT the Earth ground.
From that moment the whole scenery
changes: The atmosphere lightens up and extends higher up with the decreased
pressure, and where the sunlight now and readily can begin to promote its (our)
normal Ozone Shield Process: SOME hydrogen escapes out and away from the
Earth’s gravitational influence
[partly
refilled from beneath through weather erosion on the Earth’s surface crust]
WHILE Oxygen and Nitrogen begins to appear freely, at first in the upper Earth
atmosphere where the ozoneshield atomic dissolution and resolution circulating
process works. See further [Swedish edition] The
DiaSQUARE and Earth’s Organic Life.
So, in conclusion, says TNED — Do correct if wrong: faulty
statements are not allowed here:
— Extra water — or prevailing water
— will not escape on its own from an already given massive body capable of
assuring water containment on its surface.
— No mother god loving way.
WITH a given mass to a given celestial body, and provided gravitation
enough to withhold the actual elements, matter does not escape on its own from
that body:
— If the initial Earth mass was
5.975 T24 KG, it so is still today [and will so continue] — apart from a
discernible gaseous hydrogen leak through the atmosphere which has no influence
on the bulk of the Earth mass.
That leaves us with the pending
rough difference IN INVESTIGATION
[5.9750—5.9722=0.0028] T24 Kg = 2.8
T21 KG
in need of SOME other explanatory
power — what, we do not know.
Awaiting an eventual (ev.)
enlightenment from the responsible IAUorganization, we will continue (here) to
stick to the instrumental epoch constant chart of values — as we suspect from
these proving examples there is some natural CONTAMINATING COMPUTER MODELING
ISSUES going on inside the scientific academy and its societies:
— Compare the two examples in CERTIFYING NATURAL CONSTANTS. While the
classic instrumental epoch constants give VERY GOOD EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS
WITH APPLIED TNEDTHEORY on actual instrumental epoch constants , the later
computer epoch constants does not hold.
So we have several provable issues pointing directly to the modern
academic society and (some of) its IAUadopted constants: the ball is theirs.
We [here] suspect a deeper explanation behind the tight fittings on the
solid Edifice of the 1883 Flinders Petrie measured Cheops Pyramid than just
”fancy coincidences”. But we have absolutely no other proof than these at the
present.
— The observed and here notified
simple numerical figures of 58 and √16000 simplifies the whole construct
down to the same basic simple elementary figures that make up the totality (NatCH):
The figure 58 = 5·8 + 18 = 58 is
dissolved to the simple Golden Section basic figures as
58 = 2·2·2·5 + 18 where (orig.Dec2017.sw.
The MiUNIT) appears
directly through
R =
(√5 — 1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section
Constant
0.0254 M = [ROUND 100([1M/1’’]2b/R)R^18]/10
000
=
1’’
•
(2b/R)R^18 = 2.539568549 = 2.54 cM = 1’’ = 0.0254 M with 2 rounding
decimals;
Not present in modern academy
society:
•
THE NUMBER FIGURE 18 in
TNED is also central in determining [See also EXAMPLE 1] the atomic masses as practically
equivalent to the experimentally measured [Codata/HOPtable], based on atomic (not nuclear as in modern
quarters) atomic
mass defects by elliptic functions from the Neutron
Square (certifying Experimental Physics + TNED = True);
The number 18 is the maximum
electron number mass defect capital related to the neutron body in all
TNEDexothermal fusion calculations and processes (See [sw.] Exothermal Fusion Law):
PetrieCR and rJCR share the same
ideal geometrical pyramid top — these become corresponding constants:
SUGGESTED CONSTANTS (PETRIEb=4534.40±0.25)’’:
R =
(√5 — 1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section
Constant
rJ =198.5721548M = 7817.80137’’
CENTRAL CONSTANTS:
u, m(n), m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
(rJ/100R)² = 16000,90491
b/rJ =
115.17376M/198.5721548M = 0.580009619
=
4534.40’’ /
7817.80137’’
S =
100R ....... 2
decimals = 61.80’’ = MiUNIT [see further
on The Gallery HighStep]
b =
58R√16 000 = 4534.196576’’
= 115.168593 M ; lowest
4534.15; 4534.20 OK
rJ =
100R√16 000 =
7817.580303’’ = 198.5665397 M
=
b·100/58
PETRIEb·100/58 = (4534.4)100/58 = 7817.931034’’ =
198.5754483 M
rJ/100R = √16 000
•
R =
(√5 — 1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden Section
Constant
•
PETRIEb/rJ =
4534’.4’’/7817.80137’’ = 0.580009619 = b/rJ
•
(rJ/100R)² = 16
000.9..;
•
100b/rJ = 58.0009619..
•
(2b/R)R^18 =
2.539568549 = 2.54 cM = 1’’ = 0.0254 M with 2 rounding decimals.
— NOTE: 5·8 + 18 = 58. Really. (»Advanced Alzheimers»). See The
1818+18+k Neutron.
In the section Certifying Natural Constants two foremost
examples are given showing — proving — how these newer modern academy constant
modifications lose sight of the actual scientific perspective: explaining
nature, not dictating (a new) nature;
— Nature and Modern Academy does not
match.
Article
27.1 in explicit: ”1. Everyone
has the right freely to
participate in the cultural life of the
community, to enjoy the arts and to share in
scientific advancement and its benefits.”.
— Does it look like Dec2019 that The
Responsible GOOGLE Administration with associated MICROSOFT CORPORATION even
understands the concept?
Do share.
— Stupid enough, we thought they
were here to HELP — at the same time DEVELOPING the market for IMPROVEMENT, not
for greed: for KNOWLEDGE and SCIENCE. Suddenly they started to DICTATE
COMMANDS, taking CONTROL over our BOUGHT devices.
COMPARE:
— »YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO READ THIS
BOOK WITHOUT OUR DICTATING INTERPRETATIONS: we own the world».
Freely. Some instances really
understand how to make humanity shine.
So, in order to promote further practical examples:
The problem is that a computer has no sense of personal judgment, and
cannot alert the user when the latter exceeds his universal mandate: the
mission to interpret, not to dictate.
Serve. Not rule.
— »MustBuyBook, said G. OOGLE and M.
ICROSOFT W. Indows 10».
— »Because I have BOUGHT everything
that can be bought by Me, I can do whatever The FWord I want with IT: my
computer».
At least one IPCCexample already
exists exposing the technique in exactly how computers are used SEEMINGLY
PROVABLY TO THE ATOM to enhance pictures of reality more adopted to inventions
than deductions: See The 2010 IPCC
Heat Inbrake Example.
— We are still awaiting a more
profound resolution.
Besides that, the foremost TWO
EXAMPLES OF NATURAL CONSTANTS expose certain issues inside the already
established modern academic idea of where
(inside modern academy, of course,
says modern academy, where else),
exactly, the residence of
intelligence is situated.
— So what’s the point here: Whereto
is the aim?
Bottom line: Elementary —
experimental — nuclear physics.
Absolutely. The Nerve Center.
√ 16 000 = √ 16 · 10 ·100 = 4·10·√ 10 =
4·10·√2·√5 ¦ R√2 =
√2(√5 –1)/2 = (√10 – √2)/2 : rJ =
100·40·√5·(√10 – √2)/2 ¦
100·8·5 = 5·160 = 5³·32 = 5·5·5·2^{5} :
rJ = 2^{5}·5·5·5·√5·(√10
– √2)/2 INCH = 7817.580303’’ = 198.5665397 M
rJ = 5^{3}·5·√5·(√10
– √2)·2^{4}
Testing
some NATURAL CONSTANTS OF A UNIVERSE — enhanced accounted revision 27Dec2019
The PETRIEb/rJ=58/100
and rJ/100R=√16 000 CONSTANTS
R = (√5 –1)/2 = 0.618033988.. Golden
Section Constant
PETRIEb = 4534.40’’±0.25
Introduction: certifying natural constants
CERTIFYING THE GENUINENESS OF NATURAL
CONSTANTS BY EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS
TNED
IS EXPOSED TO A GENERAL UNIVERSAL first TEST On RESULTS FROM
EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS
ATOMIC MASSES
TNED atomic masses from the Planck constant h=mcr deduced NEUTRON
with its associated and (here) discovered NEUTRON SQUARE
(the Neutron 1818+18+k ±e massive) through the concept of atomic
mass defects[BasicCON][Deduction] with quantities calculated from elliptic
equations and functions
CONTRA the modern academic (MAC) concept of nuclear mass defects from ideas pertaining to ”particles inside the atomic
nucleus” contrary the TNED deduced basics from the
energy law: How Nature
explains, illustrates and points out how to reach a definite
explanation:
Bell Clean Hit.
The black dots show the modern academy
values from its Weizäcker
equations based on the modern idea of the atomic nucleus as a
solid sphere with actual spinning smaller particles inside of it.
— TNED/Nature clarifies splashed water the energy law with distinct drops that
physics/nature doesn’t work like that, except as a rough primitive first basic
model.
EXPERIMENTAL
PHYSICS (Nature) + TNED (Related Deductions) = TRUE.
Modern
Academy nuclear physics’ theory — inventions, not deductions — is outclassed as
a primitive occurrence in humanity.
CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n),
m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
—
Experimental physics clearly chooses TNED before MAC. Employed
constants verified.
TNED
IS EXPOSED TO A GENERAL UNIVERSAL second TEST On RESULTS FROM
EXPERIMENTAL PHYSICS
SUN’S PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT
TNED Sun Photometric Effect Final Test is a complete universal TNED mathematicalphysical test
on all the TNEDdeduced parameters ending on a calculated quantity of the
actual photometric effect given out from our Sun.
RESULT:
Bell Clean Hit — with the Kepler
Anomalistic calculated value for the Sun mass as mS = 1.98966183
T30 KG instead of the Wikipedia value mS = 1.98847 T30 KG: rVIZ= 1025.048845.
See all the explaining details in
(Swedish edition) The SunMassNOW: Thed Wikipedia referenced mSvalue
has no source: claimed, searched for, not found.
This FIT
only accounts for with the Instrumental Epoch’s constant values, same as in Test1
CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n),
m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
The later
(2000+) Computer Epoch constant values dos not give a corresponding match:
Bell Clean Hit — with the
Kepler Anomalistic calculated value for the Sun mass as mS = 1.98966 T30
KG — see open SpreadSHEETS manipulable
for testing:
With the
exact mS = 1.98966183 figure the Pfme figure becomes 3.8274990575 — a difference of 0.000000942
458 744 823 682 .. compared to the above 0.000000101:
0.000000942
..... EXACT now CLASSIC CALCULATED ANOMALISTIC
KEPLER SOLAR MASS 1.9866183 T30 KG
0.000000101
..... shorter 1.9866 T30 KG.
— See also
SUN MASS BEGIN FROM KCELL and SunBeginMassValue.
The Computer Epoch corresponding
rVIZ value is 1025.38478 giving the Kepler Sun Mass value 1.98966183 T30 KG
with a Pfme value 3.8306601288 T26 W — clearly out of range:
3.8275 + 0.0014 = 3.8289 MAX. The
Computer Epoch (2000+) constant values does not hold.
Out of range. Overflow.
Again:
EXPERIMENTAL
PHYSICS (Nature) + TNED (Related Deductions) = TRUE.
Modern Academy nuclear physics’ theory
— inventions, explainable in detail, not deductions — is again confirmed
NOT ONLY as a more primitive occurrence in humanity,
BUT ALSO HAS ISSUES IN (2000+)
MANIPULATING THE NATURE CONSTANTS:
— To be refuted as an incorrect
statement, or acknowledged as a genuinely true one.
CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n),
m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
—
Experimental physics BY THE INSTRUMENTAL EPOCH CONSTANT VALUES ONLY clearly
chooses TNED before
MAC. Employed constants verified.
RESERVATION:
—
Because not all combinations have been tested (the gravitation constant G
for example is known to have a poor decimal preciseness, and nobody seems to
know for certain how to make improvements in the figure length) nothing
here is know for certain about eventually existing combinations that might
compete the above fits on the given constants by others. On the other hand, the
concept of MATHEMATICAL EQUALITY seems to mandate some restrictions, not here
further debated.
The
TNEDcollected cosmicuniversal constants with respect to the famously shy
gravitational constant G.
—
All terms in the the right part of the connection consists of constants. And so
G also should have a general broad spectrum of numerical figures after the
known three first 6.67. As yet (Dec2019) nobody seem to know how.
—
Calculation Note: The middle rank cannot be used as such in typ OpenOffice
cells. The results just shows a ”0”. It is the bottleneck is the (mn=1.674642..
t27 KG)^14part. Rearrange it as follows, it has been tested and it works:
As
for the present (Dec2019), both r¦m(0cK) constants can only be
calculated by use of a given Gvalue. The rest is just a Test. See (Swedish
edition) THE GSECTION.
The third test
So — »the third test» — the
constants in question
CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n),
m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
are very well confirmed by several
independent tests of physics to give accurate confirmed quantities inside our
universal electrogravita(tiona)l environment.
Our issue here was to make checks on
the connection
with Flinders Petrie’s measured
Cheops Rectangle — the (here) noted rJCIRCLE seemingly enveloping the complex:
:
mJ = (c0·rJ/h)³πm_{n}^{4}/3
CENTRAL CONSTANTS: u, m(n),
m(e), h, c_{0} as given from the Instrumental
Epoch (IE 19601999) HOP
section.
:confirmed with an unmistakable
bright shining elegance in Test1 and Test2.
— The issue lies on the rJCIRCLE
radius quantity — only.
THE ENERGY LAW — unit without
parts
— Calling
ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 222 .. 111
— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday ..
The
energy law — absolute basic physics
THE ENERGY LAW
(fully explained in the Swedish edition)
— MAC uses it — but not in its full extent.
Nature illustrates herself in Principles. But Modern
Academy [1800+] never even saw Her: perfect math. Perfect physics.
SHE is NEVER mean to her children. Do correct if wrong. Faulty statements are
not allowed here.
NO DEFINITE CONSTITUENTS — the UNIT is preserved [MIC]:
1 = (n)/(n) = (n→∞)/(n→∞)
= A/A — amount has no meaning
— modern academy cannot handle this type of
mathematics, see HumanityIP.
Atomic nuclei can split (MIC, mass interactive connection [conv.
deBroglie’s eq.]) — as water droplets from impact — and expose a time
limited existence (always ending on an electronpositron pair with following
annihilation, see PairAnnihilation in related physics).
BUT Drops United
DO NOT SPIN AROUND EACH OTHER INSIDE THE UNITING ELEMENT
— In fact: drops are not seen at all inside the uniting
element.
In modern academy (MAC) this natural behavior has been
given (invented) a TRANSPOSITION ALSO INTO the actual unaffected atomic
nucleus. One speaks of ”particles inside the nucleus” where related physics
(TNED) states there are none — see PASTOM, principle structure of mass (the atomic nucleus as the fundamental
form of gravitation):
mass constitutes an unlimited number of mass elements
constantly dividing so that no smallest part exist
m = m(n→∞)(n→∞)^{–1} = (F/a)
(n→∞)^{–1}(n→∞) = (F/[a(n→∞)])(n→∞)
= m’(n→∞):
— modern academy cannot handle this type of
mathematics, see HumanityIP.
— The only way to extract massless, m→[(E=hf)c^{–2}]
pure light (heat) energy [COEI, conservation of energy by induction] from mass (the primary mass
destructor E=mc^{2}=hf) is based on a natural
(cognitive) principle allowing absolutely no remaining mass particles: pair
annihilation,
resulting in zero spin, zero charge, zero mass.
No mass what so
ever. All moments and forces in the atomic nucleus sum zero: atoms need no
refill to work (Atom and Nuclear RELATED PHYSICS’ two King’s Equations)[momentum and force]:
— modern academy cannot handle this type of
mathematics, see HumanityIP.
Modern academy
especially in nuclear physics’ understanding of our basic
universe,
is fundamentally
far away from Nature.
Do correct if wrong. Faulty statements are not allowed
here.
— It’s not about religion. It’s
about US humans.
— Calling
ATLANTIS .. ello .. ello .. 111 .. 333
— Roger .. Roger .. Mayday .. Mayday ..
— ATLANTIS DOES NOT EXIST.
— Yes, no. I hear you keep saying
that.
— And I don’t think there is any
body else these days having missed that part.
Additional indirect
Strong proof:
And there is more
•
Cheops
Rectangle — Cheops Pyramid: TNED, The rJCircle — related physics
only:
— The building (Petrie’s
measurements from 1883) assumes an early familiarity with TNED (TNED FROM THE
BEGINNING in Swedish):
In its most central aspect, ignoring all the editions inbetween:
— A (promised [assured by the energy
law]) guaranteed environmental harmonic solution to the presently most
prominent human energy problem (ATA/CAT: the complete dissolution of the atomic nucleus): exact
mathematicallyphysically deduced in detail — but is impossible to reach by
modern academic standards, as ALSO explained in detail: all questions
answered.
— Nature cannot be described by
present established concepts in math and physics.
Modern Academy 1800+ has a strong tendency
in wanting to be seen as a Commander
of Experimental Physics. It isn’t. But at the present,
humanity knows of no other Captain of the Ship.
SHORT:
— What’s the ”rJCircle”?
— Our Earth on a TNEDN3m20Neutron(h=mcr) mass density 1,82 T17 KG/M².
— Is that significant in any way
besides that?
— Yes. Indeed. Very significant. But
a presentation in English is not at hand. See the corresponding deduced
mathematical physics in THE SPRING
ANALOGY: The Kcell DETONATION in Swedish.
The rJCIRCLE part as such is more
simple to present.
CONDITIONS: HowStart —
TheEntrance:
Conditions — in analyzing the Cheops
Pyramid
FROM
THE 1883 FLINDERS PETRIE’S MEASURES
The Entrance
The decisive
opening (entrance denotes A): there is not much left of it.
IMAGE SOURCE : 1883 Flinders Petrie Cheops
Pyramid measurements
@INTERNET from
Right: This drawing is a [Jan2020]
vertical corrected version from the source’s PetriePLATE.9:
— PetriePLATE.9 shows growing height
error in the drawn values, not concordant with the specified values given by
Petrie. The horizontal scaling is though an excellent matching with Petrie’s
values. See how the correction was made in CONDITIONSdraw.
— Left: The inner design of Cheops
Pyramid, thoroughly adopted to and so in accord with the Flinders Petrie
measurements from 1883. The designations are further used in the main text to
relate the different details.
PETRIE MEASURED
ONLY THE REMAINING STAIRCASE MASONRY AVERAGED SLOPING ANGLE
(Pstair°) = 51°
52’ ± 2’. Se Petrie values in PetrieCH6.25.
— That angle is
also the one Petrie adopted in deducing the entrance position — on the idea of
an original high precision flat casing surface with help of Petrie’s measured
19th stone block course
668.2’’ over the pavement and its (suggested)
relation to the entrance passage (measuring) geometry.
CONDITIONS — comparing, analyzing
DRAWINGS AND
VALUES must
— m u s t —
match into the
bare pixel for precise inspection and comparison;
— All
differences in this topic Cheops
Rectangle and Cheops
Pyramid from Petrie’s measurements 1883 are (very) tight:
— And a bad
drawing (skewed projection) only exaggerates the frustration of NOT getting
anywhere.
Petrie’s Plate 9 — with a
vertical scale correction. But the correction is NOT linear all over Petrie’s
drawing, only up to the actual analyzing level: must be recalibrated for each
specific vertical distance. For thorough inspection and comparison, the entire
Petrie Plate 9 drawing must be redrawn with pixel exact matches to the Petrie
given measured values.
— It is not known here if the
vertical scale error reflects some computer scanning device skewing, or if the
error reflects the original Petrie work.
See more details in NatDES.
NATURE’S
DESIGN OF A UNIVERSE — a TNED
related compilation of the Cheops Pyramid Flinders Petrie results
SCALE, NUMBER AND UNIT APPEARANCE
THE rJCIRCLE
PREFERENCES WITH THE PETRIE MEASURED TOLERANCES
PetriePLATE.9 is corrupted vertically
— not horizontally
THE GALLERY HIGH STEP ¦ Original
3Ddrawing below right from 2017 in The STEP
a: PetriePLATE.9 — is corrupted
vertically, not horizontally: Petrie given vertical values does not match the
corresponding significantly drawn parts: Petrie values show lower than the
corresponding drawing. The vertical error is NOT proportional — for example »by reducing
the drawing by 98% as above we’re home». NO. lower parts will not [again]
fit with Petrie given values. The entire drawing, correct on the xscale, has
to be redrawn altogether — vertically — if it shall be used in any kind of
precise concord with the Petrie given vertically measured and text written
values. See also The
Corrupted Drawing on The Entrance, ConDRAW.
b: PetriePLATE.9
vertically SO adjusted 98% — on the level of the south end of The Gallery
matching the actual Petrie referred values.
c: THE PART IN
QUEST — not sufficient Petrie [or other sources] data are known here in
settling the quarry: The GSbody paragon PetrieCR¦b58 agent advertises
a Pvalue 2027.76’’ above the Petrie pavement zero reference height. IF — as is
suggested by the GSbody — the Gallery Construct works by an ideal ArcTan½: If
so, its top construction line would meet the South Wall 61.80’’ from the
Pyramid vertical Centre EXACTLY intersecting the Pline value. Then the height
of the Gallery TAKEN BETWEEN THE pGPOINT @d AND THE ROOF OF THE IDEAL
ArcTan½ CONSTRUCTION LINE would be exactly 2027.76 — 61.80/2 —
1658.2 [or GSsuggested 1658.17] = 338.66’’ [338.63]. PetrieCH7.46 only
gives a mean sum by ”therefore at half the height of the gallery, that varying
from 167 to 172.” : 167 + 172 = 339”;
Wikipedia (The Great Pyramid) gives a ”8.6” Meters = 338.58’’. No
related precise value is known here.
d: OVERVIEW
of the actual site in the interior of Cheops Pyramid — The Great Step and the
observed GSbody arithmetics with a concealed MeterInch unit: 1’’ = 0.0254
Meter = [ROUND 100·(2b·[1Meter/1Inch]/R)·R^18]/10000 with b=PetrieCP¦4534.40 or
PetrieCR/¦b58=4534.20 and
R=(5^½ — 1)/2.
e: Overview
@e further clarified with the total Cheops Pyramid section SouthNorth from the
1883 Flinders Petrie Measures on The Cheops Pyramid.
— See PetrieSOURCES @INTERNET.
RESOLUTION SCALE DIFFERENCES
The difference in angle between
Petries Staircase slope value
51° 52’ = 51.86666...°
and that of the ideal Golden Section
Cheops Rectangle
ArcTan 1/R = ArcCotR = ArcTan
[2/(5^½ — 1)]^½ as
51° 49’ 38.25’’ = 51.82729238°
is only
0.039 37 42 89° with a tangent of
0.00068 7211.
On a rough horizontal 1000 inch wide
window the vertical difference will not even raise up to one single pixel
(0.67p).
With some »half interfering
approximation image technique» we can (at most) illustrate the difference as
below:
Comparing the difference along this
whole screen length (980pixels) the deviation at the end is approximately no
more than 1 pixel:
— The ideal Cheops Rectangle
compared to the Petrie given measures, will NOT be visible to the naked eye
unless relatively large drawings are used (>20 inches). At most, not even a
quarter of that is used here in this presentation.
— Anyway, we use
enlargings/magnifications to illustrate the precision details with the aim of
exposing the differences.
CheopsATLASTNED
— Jan2020
innehåll: content SÖK
på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök alla ämnesord överallt i SAKREGISTER · förteckning över alla
webbsidor
Universums Historia —
CheopsATLASTNED
ämnesrubriker
innehåll
ProofCodON — PROVING THE CONTRACTED CONSTRUCT
TNEDtoPETRIE — HOW TNED connects to THE 1883 FLINDERS PETRIE MEASURED CHEOPS
PYRAMID
ElawRef — THE ENERGY LAW — unit without parts
referenser
[HOP]. HANDBOOK OF PHYSICS, E. U. Condon, McGrawHill 1967
Atomviktstabellen
i HOP allmän referens i denna presentation, Table 2.1 s9–65—9–86.
m_{n} =
1,0086652u ...................... neutronmassan
i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 2.1 s9–65]
m_{e} =
0,000548598u .................. elektronmassan
i atomära massenheter (u) [HOP Table 10.3
s7–155 för m_{e} , Table 1.4 s7–27 för u]
u = 1,66043 t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [HOP Table 1.4 s7–27,
1967]
u = 1,66033
t27 KG .............. atomära massenheten [ENCARTA 99 Molecular
Weight]
u = 1,66041 t27 KG
............... atomära massenheten
[FOCUS MATERIEN 1975 s124sp1mn]
u = 1,66053886 t27 KG ........ atomära
massenheten [teknisk kalkylator, lista med konstanter SHARP EL506W
(2005)]
u = 1,6605402 t27 KG .......... atomära
massenheten [@INTERNET (2007) sv. Wikipedia]
u = 1,660538782 t27
KG ...... atomära massenheten [från www.sizes.com],
CODATA
rekommendation från 2006 med toleransen ±0,000 000 083 t27 KG (Committe
on Data for Science and Technology)]
c_{0} = 2,99792458 T8 M/S ........ ljushastigheten
i vakuum [ENCARTA 99 Light, Velocity, (uppmättes i början på
1970talet)]
h = 6,62559 t34 JS ................. Plancks konstant [HOP s7–155]
— Det internationella standardverket om universum sammanställt vid universitetet i Cambridge, The Cambridge Encyclopaedia of Astronomy, London 1977.
[BKL]. BONNIERS KONVERSATIONS LEXIKON, 12 band A(1922)Ö(1928) med SUPPLEMENT AÖ(1929)
t för 10^{–}, T för 10^{+},
förenklade exponentbeteckningar — simplified notations: t for TEN
RAISED TO minus and T for TEN RAISED TO plus.
MAC, här ofta använd
förkortning för Modern ACademy — etablerad
vetenskap sedan början av 1800talet
TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS —
Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.
(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska
Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som
följer av härledningarna i Planckringen
h=m_{n}c_{0}r_{n}, analogt Atomkärnans
Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad,
vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt
logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås
(således) också
RELATERAD FYSIK OCH
MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.
See
also TNED FROM THE BEGINNING (Swedish edition
only Aug2019).
SHORT ENGLISH — TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under
this domain
(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).
TNED or Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is
the dynamically equivalent resulting description following the deductions in THE PLANCK
RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The
description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details claim
to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With TNED
is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the
emergence of the term TNED
in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.
Senast uppdaterade version: 20230121
*END.
Stavningskontrollerat 20200326¦26Mar2020.
rester
*
åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se
≈
Δ Ĵ ∫ α √ π → ∞ τ π ħ
ε UNICODE — often used charcters in mathematicaltechnicalscientifical
descriptions
σ
ρ ν ν π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ
ω → ∞ ≡ ↔↕ ħ ℓ
Ω
Φ ϕ ϕ
Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ ~
α
β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ
σ ω ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫ ≤ ≈
≥ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓
ζ
ξ
Arrow symbols, direct via
Alt+NumPadKeyboard: Alt+24 ↑; 25
↓; 26 →; 27 ←; 22 ▬
23
↨ — also 18 ↕; 29 ↔
åter till portalsidan · portalsidan är www.UniversumsHistoria.se