DELPHI4Test2014 TextPÅbild ¦ Jan2022 — UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA | 2011V4 ¦ 2022I18 | aproduction | Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-03-22 YMD ¦  HumanRight is a knowledge domain

 

 content innehåll · webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F · sök ämnesord överallt i  indexSAKREGISTER · förteckning över  alla webbsidor

 

   PAINTBRUSH document APPENDIX ¦ APPENDIX EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS — Our Universe — with THE REVELATION

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

 Vidareutvecklat Från DELPHI 4 Test 2011

T2014TextPÅbild — HUVUDDELEN AV VERKTYGEN MAN BEHÖVER FÖR AVANCERAD DATORANVÄNDNING I TEXT OCH BILD

 

 

DISPOSITION |  Teckenförklaringar: MusKLICKVänster | Höger:  |   — RullaMushjulet FRÅN | MOT:  |

 

 

TextONpicture — How DELPHI4 made it

 

TextONpicture — compiled EXAMPLE Feb2022 —  SWEDEN ON PURPOSEFULNESS — only in two decades an unbelievable violent destruction of an original heavenly stunning Nature. Where is Justice On Earth?

 

 

MACHINES travel many thousands of kilometer road — just to cut vegetation down — as on a Galactic Command some 2010+ from »The Authorities»: no warning. It just shockingly arrived. Full pace. Where is Justice On Earth? No answer.

•   SOMEONE MISSED THE ON RAMP TO NATURAL  ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY — MARKET, TRADE .. CIVILIZATION. This is not it. No mother god loving way. Machine vandalizes nature: say something intelligent. Please.

   Leaf&Needle BUILT  life — from sunlight. 3Gy to Woman. So: — Where is the replacement?  Women with three legs — new PharmA Invention Compensates? MustBuyBook. Killed animals on the roads — in growing amounts.

 

TheTextInCode:

The technique is detailed in TextIn.

The DELPHI4 code in DELPHI4Test2022 — from 27Sep201 Unit1T Delphi P2

— central executing part. All comments removed — just the raw code:

 

•   The TextIn procedure is called when the SPACE key is pressed (Toggles TextIn OnOff):

— The text becomes integrated with the background, and is handled as a General FLEET

(Ctrl+Arrows moving object) — freely mobile over the background picture for exact positioning:

— Ctrl+NumPad 123 (5 9) sets pixel step interval 1 5 20 (½page whole).

 

Procedure TextIn;

  var

   A,B,C:           TBitMap;

   Pa,Pb,Pc:        PByteArray;

   R,S:             TRect;

   g,p:             Real;

   W,H,x,y:         Integer;

   aR,aG,aB:        Byte;

   GrayC,GrayS,I,J: Byte;

   White:           Bool;

begin with Form1 do begin {Procedure TextIn;}

        if (SkipWhite=1) then exit;

        cTextIn:= wTF.Color;

        if wTF.Color=clWhite then White:=True else White:=False;

        if White and FleetOverideWT then exit;

 

        I:=0; J:=0; GrayC:=0;

        if White then

        begin

        aR:= 255;

        aG:= 255;

        aB:= 255;

        end else

        begin

        aR:= GetRValue(cTextIn);

        aG:= GetGValue(cTextIn);

        aB:= GetBValue(cTextIn);

        GrayC:= (aR+aG+aB)div 3;

        end;

        R:= Image2.ClientRect;

        S:= R;

        OffsetRect(S,X0,Y0);

        W:= R.Right  - 1;

        H:= R.Bottom - 1;

        A:= TBitMap.Create;

        B:= TBitMap.Create;

        C:= TBitMap.Create;

        try

          BitMapRect(R,A);

          A.PixelFormat:= pf32bit;

          if White then A.Assign(vBWT) else

          A.Assign(Image2.Picture);

 

          BitMapRect(R,B);

          B.PixelFormat:= pf32bit;

          B.Assign(Image3.Picture);

 

          BitMapRect(R,C);

          C.PixelFormat:= pf32bit;

          C.Canvas.CopyRect(R,Image1.Canvas,S);

          C.Transparent:= True;

          if White then C.TransparentColor:= clBlack else

          C.TransparentColor:= clWhite;

 

          for y:= 0 to H do

          begin

            if White then Pa:= vBWT.ScanLine[y] else

            Pa:= A.ScanLine[y];

            Pb:= B.ScanLine[y];

            Pc:= C.ScanLine[y];

            for x:= 0 to W do

            begin

              GrayS:= (Pa[4*x+2]+Pa[4*x+1]+Pa[4*x+0])div 3;

              if White then

              begin

                if GrayS = 0 then Continue;

                if GrayS = 255 then

                begin

                Pc[4*x+2]:= 255;

                Pc[4*x+1]:= 255;

                Pc[4*x+0]:= 255;

                Continue;

                end;

                J:= 255;

                I:= 255-GrayS;

              end else

              begin

                if GrayS = 255 then Continue;

                if(GrayS=GrayC)then Continue;

                J:= 255-GrayC;

                I:= GrayS-GrayC;

              end;

              g:= 1;

              if  (I>0)             and (I<=Round(J*1/10)) then g:= 1-0.05 else

              if  (I>Round(J*1/10)) and (I<=Round(J*2/10)) then g:= 1-0.10 else

              if  (I>Round(J*2/10)) and (I<=Round(J*3/10)) then g:= 1-0.20 else

              if  (I>Round(J*3/10)) and (I<=Round(J*4/10)) then g:= 1-0.30 else

              if  (I>Round(J*4/10)) and (I<=Round(J*5/10)) then g:= 1-0.40 else

              if  (I>Round(J*5/10)) and (I<=Round(J*6/10)) then g:= 1-0.50 else

              if  (I>Round(J*6/10)) and (I<=Round(J*7/10)) then g:= 1-0.60 else

              if  (I>Round(J*7/10)) and (I<=Round(J*8/10)) then g:= 1-0.70 else

              if  (I>Round(J*8/10)) and (I<=Round(J*9/10)) then g:= 1-0.80 else

              if  (I>Round(J*9/10))                        then g:= 1-0.90;

              p:= 0.2;

              if White and ((Pb[4*x+2]+Pb[4*x+1]+Pb[4*x+0])=765) then g:= 0;

              Pc[4*x+2]:= Round( p*g*(Pa[4*x+2]) + (1-p)*g*aR + (1-g)*(Pb[4*x+2]) ) ;

              Pc[4*x+1]:= Round( p*g*(Pa[4*x+1]) + (1-p)*g*aG + (1-g)*(Pb[4*x+1]) ) ;

              Pc[4*x+0]:= Round( p*g*(Pa[4*x+0]) + (1-p)*g*aB + (1-g)*(Pb[4*x+0]) ) ;

            end;{endForX}

          end;{endForY}

        Image1.Canvas.Draw(X0,Y0,C);

        finally

           A.Free;

           B.Free;

           C.Free;

        end;{endTry}

end;{endWithForm1}

end;{endTextIn}

 

 

Knowledge is abstract to business.

•   Please do disclaim that statement — anyone who can, on any reasonable related foundation of apprehendable logic.

     Search for. None yet found.

:

Business cannot handle knowledge — HumanRight. Slavery. Trafficking. To mention the worst.

 

Populations treated as supervised tagged cattle — private property Objects — with only one purpose:

•    obedience or punishment. Slavery. Trafficking.

•   A-people informing B-people. MasterInformsCattle.

•   Guaranteed history’s worst gushing violence evolution:

— not one word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a sign. Not a hint.

 

SERIOUS STATES DOES NOT RAISE CHILDREN FOR PROFITING PURPOSES:

Business handles matter, trade, transport. Never knowledge. No exceptions. Say.

 

Knowledge cannot be quantified.

— Hi.

— Hi.

— I would like to have box of wit, and a minor pack of understanding. Thank you very much.

So: slavery it is — when HumanRight is not recognized.

 

Knowledge — on a HumanRight foundation — is the base of CIVILIZED business: free market :

 

”.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”

•   no business what so ever. Not one word. No dealing. No compromising.

 

Knowledge can handle business — because it cares for what business has no concept of :

•   HumanRight.

•   Family. Friendship. Technological evolution — with nature. Not ON her.

•   Business — without maintained on a strict HumanRight basis — says bye-bye to Civilization.

•   Market, trade, cannot be destroyed. So: business it is, with or without slavery.

 

Say.

 

 

TheTextInCode

 

APPENDIX: HumanRight ¦ Itera ¦ TheIterationTheorem ¦ TheBeta ¦ TheREVELATION ¦ TICOC ¦ TheMACrevelation ¦ Europe1800+ ¦ DEFENSE ¦ MaTool ¦ TheComposition ¦ CalCards — Kalkylkort

 

Itera:

 THE ITERATION THEOREM (Sw. den allmänna IterationsSatsen)

REASON FOR A GENERAL CONSTANT IMPROVEMENT IN RESULTS as opposed to CONSTANTLY FAILING TO MATCH A NATURAL RECOGNITION AND VERIFICATION

The reason why related physics and mathematics succeeds in explaining natural provisions — see  THE ITERATION THEOREM.

POINT:

NATURAL LOGICS HOLD A NATURAL WAY TO NOT — not — BE UPSET angry OVER THE FACT THAT THERE IS GOOD FOOD. That is:

— A GENERAL WAY TO PROCEED INTO FURTHER SUCCESSFUL ASSOCIATIONS, LEADING FURTHER TO EVEN HIGHER REALMS.

— AN AUTOMATIC AUTOMOTIVE SELF LOCKING DEEP PENETRATING PROCEDURE, ONLY ENHANCING AND IMPROVING.

 

— What is that? Say. Can it be bought? No. Can it be sold? No. Can it be weighed? No. What is it then? Does it seem to wither? No.

— You mean, my love for you decreases with the tick of time? According to my observations, it rather is the opposed pace that counts.

 

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————

TheBeta: APPENDIX

Overview ¦ Full Beta Explanation ¦ TheREVELATION

COMPLEMENTARY DESCRIPTIONS from EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS — the planetary perihelion precession phenomena values in CHART1

THE BETA COMPLEX — SUN’S PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT

The decisive end result

 

IT WOULD SEEM like that the Beta factor presents some HAZARD to the overall IAU-testing program on the Sun’s photometric effect and the entailing results here in UniverseHistory: If the Beta values is changed — even so on a last 14th decimal — the entire chart of results (especially G and mS, not to say the planetary perihelion precession results: CHART1) will be effectively KILLED, wiped out, nothing left of it.

 

The point is with the Beta factor, that it contains inner MATCHING interatomic distance parameters — that we anyway cannot handle by exact average values — due to the normal physics where always a solid state interatomic fluctuation morphology exists. It is shown here, by alternative values, that these can be altered within acceptable margins and limits of the known material world properties — securing the Beta effectively: no hazard: »Perfect Assembly».

 

The Beta Factor

IAUtestDETAILS

IN RELATED PHYSICS — Planck Equivalents — SUN HAS A Raw Effect AND A Measurable Photometric Effect. THE DIFFERENCE IS DEFINED BY THE BETA COMPLEX PARAMETERS,

 

The IAU-test result on

The Planetary Perihelion Precessions Phenomena

short background

 

UniverseHistory content — as explaining, relating, comparing and referring on modern academic teaching system as an (1800+) — unrelated: by DRIFT, not plan — and apparently provable primitive (cosmological) occasion in the history of humanity:

all cosmological details collected — as related and referred — under one and the same headline

 

Namely the foremost present (Nov2022+):

 

•   TheRESULT in CHART1 stating that the calculated values

the planet’s perihelion precession values

cannot be reached by present academic nomenclature (relativity theory) — despite exact same math rank: AllKeplerMATH.

 

The REASON BEHIND why modern academy never was invited

— not earlier mentioned @Internet what we know —

needs some related description of a deeper nature. Test some of the answers in WhyCANNOT.

 

article

 

securing a continued reasonable IAU-test precision — end result in the planetary perihelion precessions, as deduced in related physics from AllKeplerMATH.

Provided a continuing preservation of the acquired IAU test precision

Associated DOCUMENT details: T2014PantB.htm ¦ T2014Graf.htm — The4P ¦ FysikaliskaGrundbegrepp2.htm#OverviewJan2023

THE BETA PARAMETER SECURES INTERNAL parametric ATOMIC MARGINS

Explanation

We continue the description [ from TheElectricConstant ][ from TheRESULT ][ from CHART1 ]:

 

ITERATING THE K-CELL PARAMETRIC COMPLEX in preserving the 12 decimal Sun photometric IAU international standard (2015)

3.827500000000 T26 W ± 0.0014 significands

•   also entails a preservation of the general bETA parameter (at present 8Feb2023)

•   1.16324540739068 = bETA                                                                                           ;

•   = 1 + 14.64973110000000(dS¦2.96000000000000 t10 M ÷ dC¦2.65632000000000 t8 M)  ;

•   BETA = 14.64973110000000 = (Table)                                                                        ;

•   β = [d(S¦Solytan)/d(C¦fastaMaterien)]/[P/(Pmät – P)] = [(Tγ/TP¦J)/(Tγ/TP¦S)]           ;

•   β = [d(S¦SunSurf)/d(C¦solidStatePhy)]/[P/(Pmes – P)] = [(Tγ/TP¦J)/(Tγ/TP¦S)]           ;

BETA   = F99/D99 (KcellAnalays2018.ods T2 E92) = 14.64973110000000

             = (E97/E99)/D99

             = (TγSunRIM ÷ TPLANCKSunRIM)/(C97/C99)

             = (TγSunRIM ÷ TPLANCKSunRIM)/(TγEARTH ÷ TPLANCKEARTH)

These decisive parametric factors are completely unknown in modern academy — as explained:

•   TheCAUSE:

 

UNKNOWN PHYSICS PREVENTED MODERN ACADEMY FROM UNDERSTANDING THE PHENOMENA OF PLANETARY PERIHELION PRECESSION

 

Situation 8Feb2023:  on a still preserved IAU SunPhotometric 12 decimal precision 3.827500000000:

6.67010000933003 t11 JM/(KG)2  ....   G universal gravitational constant

1.98963199772617 T30 KG  ..............   mSUN present Sun mass — @SunAGE: 20.805 Gy

 

 

E3

shorter:

Modern academic (1900+) cheer for relativity theory led the academy to oblivion for reality. Do disclaim anyone who can. Searched for. Non yet found:

•   relativity theory blocks natural understanding — because it kills related physics.

ESPECIALLY ON THE LEVEL OF MATHEMATICS. Compare AllKeplerMATH.

 

Modern academy cannot calculate — collect — the CHART1 accounted related physics values. We dare say: no way.

 

 

•   Absolutely do show some disclaiming argumentation. And we will surrender immediately.

Searched for. Non yet found. AllKeplerMATH.

 

•   AS RELATED: Albert Einstein definitely did not understand basic Kepler-Galilei-Newton kinetic-mechanic-physics

[Newton’s Famous Vessel Experiment on Rotation — explaining inertial reference experiment ].

No way. Compare

 

”Försök att tänka er att det finns en enda kropp i universum, vilken bildas vårt KS [Einsteins transkription för koordinatsystem]. Denna kropp börjar rotera. Enligt den klassiska fysiken är de fysikaliska lagarna för en roterande kropp skilda från dem som gäller för en kropp som inte roterar. Om tröghetslagen är giltig i det ena fallet, gäller den inte i det andra.”,

FYSIKENS UTVECKLING

Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld · Natur och Kultur 1938 · sidan 178

 

 

translated

 

» Try to imagine there is only one single body in the universe, which constitute our KS [Einstein’s transcript for Coordinate System]. This body starts to rotate. According to classical physics the physical laws for a rotating body is separated from those holding for a body which is not rotating. If the inertial law is valid in the one case, it is not in the other.»

 

Einstein — FYSIKENS UTVECKLING 1938 s178 [Physics’ Development] — on TheRotatingBody  — a true disclaimer of Einstein’s ideas:

 

” Det strider sålunda mot sunda förnuftet att tala om en enda kropps rörelse. Den klassiska mekaniken och det sunda förnuftet råkar här i en våldsam konflikt”,

FYSIKENS UTVECKLING

Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld · Natur och Kultur 1938 · sidan 178

 

translated

 

» It hence contradicts common sense to talk about one single body’s motion. The classical mechanics and the common sense here encounter a violent conflict», Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld 1938.

 

See also the general TheVIC — modern academy’s 1900+ famous cheer for relativity.

 

 

FROM WHERE ON EARTH AND IN ANY HEAVENS DID EINSTEIN GOT HIS IDEAS OF ”CLASSICAL PHYSICS”?

”According to classical physics the physical laws for a rotating body is separated from those holding for a body which is not rotating”. There is nothing such in Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics. No way. See Summing1800+.

 

 

”also entails”; EXPLAIN

WHAT MARGINS?

 

INTERATOMIC DISTANCES

(on any given average mean density condition, any material in any state)

experience FLUCTUATIONS (interatomic vibrations, resonances, coupling).

 

•   The bETA factor (1.16324540739068) as a constant contains these MINOR

— WITHIN THE REASONABLE ATOMIC DISTANCES —

fluctuations:

 

bETA preserves internal atomic fluctuations — »within reasonable limits»:

 

 

KcellAnalys2022b.ods T2 M44  —  some of the values tested and used during the evaluation

 

 

SunGravitationalRadius: rGsun = [ρr(8/mA)–1/3/r0]–1/4(3/4π)1/3[(1/m0SLIM)1/3 – (1/mS BEGIN)1/3]–1

SunRawEffect: Praw = ε0[4π(rGsun)2]2 ¦ ε0  free space electric constant 

WHAT DOES IT MEAN?

IAU SunPPHOTO: iauPpho = 3.8275 T26 W ± 0.0014 (international standard, Sun’s photometric effect [2015¦2018])

TNED K-cellSunTest Ppho = Praw · bETA = 3.827500000000 T26 W (at present 8Feb2023):

 

CheckRelations:

 

 

KcellAnalys2022b.ods  T2 M50

 

 

 

KcellAnalys2022b.ods  T2 M29

 

 

Testing a preserved 12 decimal IAUphotemetricSun standard, it was (Jan2023) observed that several »end precision matches» did not resolve on the last 13-14 decimals. There is, right column, a rest of a 20-25 t14 number.

•   We see (CheckRelations) that the reason is »a seemingly incongruity» i the bETA factor’s number

1.16324540739068 = bETA in the TNED testing charts (iauPpho/Praw / BETA): the IAU spouse is OK.

 

 

 

KcellAnalys2022b.ods  T2 J46 — the previous / Beta in CheckRelations ..007  has now reached a perfect nominal IAU match.

 

 

KcellAnalys2022b.ods  T2 M38

 

•  By a final 14-15 decimal bETA addition of  from

1.16324540739068 = bETA

to

1.16324540739075 = bETA

also the TNED IAU-test photometric result receives a 14 decimal preserved 3.82750000000000 significand

•   on the previous acquired G and present Sun mass mS significands’ results

G          = 6.67010000933003

mS       = 1.98963199771721

MEANING:

Adjusting end (13+) decimals in bETA to match for a preserved IAU standard significand (zero differences), offers no HAZARD to the general iterated result — but can only be interpreted as a more precise end result.

•   The difference (over 12+ decimals) is (easily) incorporated in the general bETA factor MARGINS, as exposed.

 

Sum and conclusion:

How come this whole UniverseHistory has been so successful — in its own related domain?

 

OR SIMPLER: How come we experience Progress — at all?

What is that — the fact that it is possible to proceed, even into further successful domains, whatever these may be.

 

AllKeplerMath example:

•   What is the reason for that — (The author has completely misapprehended the whole performance .. some say ..),

•   at the same time Modern Academy just advances further AWAY FROM nature:

•   What’sUp?

 

INTELLIGENCE — disorder ¦ order — no unitive idea

THIS VIEW IS apparently NOT THE WORK OF NATURE. IT suggests a PARASITE ON NATURE: ANIMAL RIGHTS suspended. SPECIES: suspended. Destructive society pictured. Say again.

— First we identify the troubling machinery part. Then, when we understand the machine error, we make corrections until it adopts — to Physical Laws. There is no voting on that. Just Law Knowledge.

Suzanne Simard 2012 with colleges: SPECIES develops during billions of years through a common underground net work of root fungi — exchanging nutrition and substances — providing the environment for its general development. Zero above ground cutting. No natural kill of the imperative root net work life developing system. BUT These Forest Apparently — correct if wrong — most prominent upright Aces, bring a definite END to that life sustaining providing species maintenance. No sir. No more fucking root net working systems. It is an apparent embarrassing obvious profiting enterprise with zero understanding of Nature. Sane humans don’t do that. So: Where is world jurisdiction: why is this obvious life destructing madness allowed to exist? Is it because world jurisdictional instances are the payed bitches for sustaining the vital oxygen to the actual enterprise? What’sUp?

 

There is obviously a good answer in mathematics — as such.

(But, as usual, it opposes Modern academic idea of ORDER — entropy:

 

MAC:    entropy means destruction — more disorder — with the tick of time (modern academy).

TNED: entropy means construction — more order — with the tick of time (Nature — Preserved).

same math. Different preferences.

).

 

See details in THE ITERATION THEOREM:

 

Short:

•   EITHER we approach a Natural morphology — and find that the sculpture just improves for each new detail worked out: convergent — just better and better.

•   OR there is LESS acquaintance With Her (The Natural). Meaning: divergent result: the more we work on It, the worse it gets.

— If She is there (The Wisdom to guide us amateurs when we get lost — as we do now and then) there is always good hope.

   Just ask for Her — and She will be there.

 

 

ImageSource: Author’s Archive 12Sep2012 E28 Bild—177 — ENTROPY — Purposefulness — semingly completely unknown in modern quarters:

EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS

 

Never fails.

 

TheBeta

 

TheIterationTheorem: 8Feb2023 — TIT ¦ EX1 ¦ EX2 ¦ EX3 ¦ TheSINE ¦ TheIteratorMechanics¦ DelphiTSELITprogram

 

 

THE SELF LOCKING ITERATING THEOREM

 

Each expressible mathematical function F which is so POSITIONED

in the 2D xy-plane as to INTERSECT — touch — the ITERATOR line y=x (The ITERATOR)

through any F.s functional tangent slope

within the 2D system’s ±45°cone domain (The Iterator Mechanics)

•   generates automatically functionally convergent results as variable inputs

 

— »nature’s inbuilt life chemistry harmonizing universally biological algorithm»

— the only one we know of

 

REGULA FALSI — ITERATIONS (from Latin, itera're, repeat)

THE ARITHMETIC ALGEBRA SELF GENERATING EQUATIONS — Root calculations Through Iterations (also named by convention: Regula Falsi)

An archived BellDHARMA production 19Oct1987 ¦ 14May1991 ¦ 7Jan2023

 

 functional intersections — we AVOID the term ”root” »equation root» — in related mathematics because IT has ”Clear issues” WITH the concept of Number Of Functional Intersections

STUDYING EXAMPLES — WHY ITERATE?

Finding precision numerical values on y=x intersections

graphical solutions — single INTERSECTIONS [ » roots »] — common to several individual equations including y=0 on a single function application as the one left below

EXPLANATION: Equation Teaching in General is a humongous extensive domain that can kill any interested new beginner in geometry and its mathematics into the bone — and It will NOT be touched here or further mentioned except on these introductory lines. In this exposition, we are only interested in any available direct explaining arithmetical method for finding a more exact value — if at all — for a specific equality between two given mathematical expressions — whatever these may be, and as far as we understand any of it.

 

GINS graphical intersection has only one single intersection point for one single y=x graphics root in a single or system of equations —

ESYS equative system solution involves a Root Multiplicity concept — one GINS can have a multiple root, type (x + 1)5 — compromising the entire Clarity in the GINS concept, and so

effectively Killing the simple and direct GINS mathematical geometry Apprehensive Nomenclature: One for One. Shorter:  established ESYS nomenclature »kills GINS nomenclature». No ESYS treat here.

See MACex — example by quote.

EX123: EX1 ¦ EX2 ¦ EX3 ¦ TheIterationTheorem 

 

 

Author’sArchives 1987-1991 — Iterations on nth degree equations — Manually drawings [ ROTRING DRAWING TOOLS] with support from technical calculators [CASIO fx-39 SCIENTIFIC CALCULATOR]

In EX1 there is only one xy-variable function: its intersection points counts for all x where y = 0 — the one function and the x-axis.

In EX2 there are two xy-variable function: their intersection points counts for all x where y = 0 — only between the two xy-variable functions.

In EX3 there are two xy-variable function: their intersection points counts for all x where y = 0 — only between the two xy-variable functions.

 

Why?

— Why iterations?

ANSWER — if at all:

•   finding precision numerical values for intersections between several intersecting — if at all —mathematically expressed FUNCTIONS (in geometry and physics in general);

•   algebraic solutions for equations with higher degree than n=2 are (normally) considered a (very) complicated exercise.

•   Then an iterative approach may solve the arithmetics (gallantly).

 

EX1: EX2 ¦ EX3

 y = x3 – 3x – 1 ; = 0 : wee seek the x-points where the graphic curve touches the x-axis:

 

y1          = GF1 = x3 – 3x – 1                  ;

y2          = GF2                           = 0       ;

y(Gx)    = ( y1 = y2)                   = 0       ; ¦ collects all Graphically INterSecting GINS point x-coordinates on the x-axis:

             = ( y1 – y2)                    = 0       ;

             = ( x3 – 3x – 1 – 0)       = y1      ;

TheFast: EX1 ¦ EX123

The fastest and simplest — provided a computer and a spread sheet program (Free OpenOffice) — no specific algebraic (often time consuming) developing jobs needed

THE MOST SIMPLE METHOD — NO DIRECT NEED FOR AN ALGEBRAIC »HELP ME OUT» JOB — same end result

TOOLS: 0. a computer. — 1. a simple graph drawing program. — 2. Free OpenOffice Spread Sheet program. — 3. Some basic familiarity with basic math [ we grow with its practice ..].

See explaining method in GenEXManualIterations. FINDING A PRECISION DECIMAL VALUE IN A GRAPHICAL FUNCTION’S INTERSECTION:

 

   KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 A1

 

•   Write in an approximated y=x value — as read (as above illustrated) approximated from a drawn graph on a given y(Gx) equation, as here: 0 = y = x³ – 3x – 1 — into a (type) A3 spread sheet cell (Free OpenOffice) ¦   •   Duplicate the A3 value to A1 ¦   •   Write the entire y(Gx) formula into cell A2 — referring its variable to A1 ¦   •   Adjust — iterate — A1 until A2 = 0.0000000.. (Decimal by decimal. WE will most certainly find our own way — perhaps a little creepy in the beginning, but faster as »we get the hang of it»). Alternatively we must develop some algebra — just on finding the same end result.

 

We continue here on more direct algebraic synthetics.

-------------------------------------------------

y(Tx)     = algebraically developed isolated x — a self locking iteration equation gives precise decimals:

algebraically developed  EX1  y(Tx):                            -------------------------------------------------

0           = x3 – 3x – 1                               ;

             = x(x2 – 3) – 1                            ;

1           = x(x2 – 3)                                  ;

x            = 1/(x2 – 3)                                 ;

————————————————————

 

 the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]         ;

y(Tx)    = x                                              ; yTxS1

x           = 1/(x2 – 3)                                 ; first single

             = –0.347296355                         ;

             See

             METHOD ANALYSIS ¦ TheFast

 

————————————————————

x2 – 3    = 1/x                                           ;

x2          = 3 + 1/x                                    ;

————————————————————

 

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]       ;

y(Tx)    = x                                              ; yTxP1

x           = ±√(3 + 1/x)                             ; first pair 

             +: 1.879385242                         ;

             –: 1.532088886                         ;

————————————————————

analysis — first single EX1 1/[x² — 3]:

METHOD WITH ELECTRONIC CALCULATOR

PRESS manually repeatedly [typical, our example]

0  — 3 = x–1 .. x²  — 3 = x–1 .. x²  — 3 = x–1 .. x²  — 3 = x–1 .. x²  — 3 = x–1 .. x²  — 3 = x–1 .. x²  — 3 = x–1 ..

(Program it so, if it has a programming feature [it probably needs a specified  LoopLength ..]).

•   With som patience, we see the number of fix decimals steady growing, .

 

METHOD WITH SPREAD SHEET ¦ FreeOpenOffice ¦ [ this character version in Swedish ]

analysis — first single EX1 1/[x² — 3]:

•   Beginning from IT=0 in this example is slightly faster:

 KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 E38

ExRow39ColF:

•   Write the iteration start value — most often 0 or ±1:

•   Write the cell code in next column cell — as illustrated above ”cell40”;

•   MARK F40 — hold Shift and let further cells below be marked as well:

•   Press Ctrl+D (duplicate) — and OpenOffice automatically fills in the consecutives —

•   immediately showing the result as above in the F column

(sometimes many more cells are needed if the convergence is slow — the IteratorMechanics explains some basics).

analysis — first pair EX1 √ 3 + 1/x:

SAME ROUTE AS ABOVE, ONLY OTHER EQUATIONS.

D4iTx: Program

D4TSELIT

If a y(Tx) has been extracted — an algebraically developed »iterativable» (iterative self locking) equation :

•   WITH A SPREAD SHEET: As exemplified in the spread sheet Analysis above; write it directly into a column of a spread sheet (Free OpenOffice), referring each to the other (beginning from typically 0), top to bottom.

•   WITH A WINDOWS DEVELOPING PROGRAM (DELPHI4 ProgamExample):

— Write the equation on the actual program’s terms, and run the program in explicit (for each specific in written equation).

ALTERNATIVELY — incorporated in Delphi4Test2022 (Unit2Addition12Feb2023):

PROGRAMMERS @INTERNET: DEVELOP FREELY AVAILABLE ADVANCED DRAWING PROGRAMS

FOR HumanRight HUMANITY TO DEVELOP THROUGH as an advanced pen and paper (and stop fooling around) — is there any alike out there?

When will Internet be free again — ever, like type 2008: no surveillance: HumanRight attended, not Microsoft and Google? FREEDOM FROM OPPRESSION. UN WORLD JURISDICTION BANNS COOKIES. RESPECT FOR HUMANITY RESTORED. EDUCATION REINSTANED.

RightClick in MathPan opens CrossCoordinate pixels — single step Checks ¦ execute y-value with normal F11 ¦ return HOME.

 

 

 HOME — with iteration enabled:                                                                                                                                                                    AltP toggles Rect/Pol

 Edit2        Edit3               Edit4 — MathInputPan                                             Multiple Draw:        Ctrl+NumpadDecimal

 Label1StatusInfo:

•   @=y(Tx)iterationStart in ±range 0-9 with 0.1-0.9 ¦   •   D=Decimals  ¦   •   Q=Turns   ¦   •   mS=CPU ExeTime in milliseconds

 

ClipBoardCopy:

      x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+(1/[–3+x'2])+0(x)

CapsLock ON: CopyToClip. Edit3: m after number = Start iterateMinus.

 

We can combine direct graph drawing with a presented result from a developed y(Tx) equation — if we include a (here) cryptic (default)

0(i09)+ before the last drawn active yTx-graph (the i in i09 replaced by a zero 0 nullifies the function and just draws).

•   The result is presented with specified (9 or more, or less) decimals with an iteration (0) start (0 before 9).

•   Removing the ”i” with an 0 tells the program to handle 0(009)+ as a zero term — so that we can draw other parts independently.

•   We can now directly test any extracted self locking iteration equation’s result on the fly.

 

IterativeSTATUS: D4iTx

 Edit2         Edit3                            Edit4 — MathInputPan                                                          AltP toggles Rect/Pol

 iteration ignored

 

 iteration acknowledged — @0 D9

x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+(1/[–3+x'2])

D4iTx

CAPS LOCK ON: TEXTRESULT STATUS TO CLIPBOARD

EXECUTE ALL NORMALLY BY F11

 iteration acknowledged — @0.1 D9

x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=0.1 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i.1.9)+(1/[–3+x'2])

 

 iteration acknowledged — @—0.1 D9

x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=-0.1 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i.1.9)+(1/[–3+x'2])

 

StartIterate@ RANGE:

•   ±0-9 ¦ ±0-0.9 ¦ letter ”m” in Edit3 (Interval) sets start @minus (the m has no other use).

Decimal range (>15=15):

•   1-15.

Max QTurns:

•   1000.

  On especially LONG ranks:

— The leading root iteration input after 0(i09) .. shold be a regular ..±(1)[..]'0.5 ¦ Otherwise the drawing program may not compute the result at all.

 

General method

Given at least two GRAPHICALLY FUNCTIONAL equation system equivalences

 

y1 = y2 = y3 = y4 =  ..  = yN  (normally seldom more than two)

 

the GINS (Graphical intersection) x coordinates between the yN equivalents are projected on the x-axis as discrete x-values by SUBTRACTING (writing on a general sum as equal to zero) any one equivalent of the yN candidates as a new graphical function

 

y(Gx)    = y1 – y2 = 0

 

From there it is our job to resolve the remaining tails on whatever means we understand of them:

EX2: EX3 ¦ EX1

y = (x – 1)2/4  = 2x2 – x4/2 ; = 0

(EX2):

 

y1          = (x – 1)2/4                    ; = (x2 – 2x + 1)/4

y2          = 2x2 – x4/2                    ; = x2(2 – x2/2) = x2(4 – x2)/2

y(Gx)    = y1 – y2

 

 

The yGx projects the summing intersection x-coordinates on the x-axis.

 

             = (x–1)2/4 – (2x2 – x4/2)

             = (x–1)2/4 – x2(4 – x2)/2

             = 0                                                          ;

 

From here: We try to break up the y(Gx) expression — aiming at finding The appropriate self locking Iteration Equation with precise GINS values — in possible  (a±x)1 and (a±x)2 factors

(because it turns out that the optimal solutions have algebraic/arithmetic end stations on square ±roots or a single GINS):

 

(x – 1)2/4           = x2(4 – x2)/2                                          ; Exemplified Compiled Accommodated Developments :

(x – 1)2              = 2x2(4 – x2) = 8x2 – 2x4                         ; THE MISSION is to Try to simplify as much as possible { on degrees 1 and 2 }:

x2 – 2x + 1         = 8x2 – 2x4                                              ;

1 – 2x                = 7x2 – 2x4                                              ;

1/2 – x               = 3.5x2 – x4                                             ;

0.5 – x               = x2(3.5 – x2)                                          ; two found second degree expressions — should hold our GINS answers:

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]        ;

y(Tx)                 =                      

x                        = ±√ [(0.5 – x)/(3.5 – x2)]                     ; first pair

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]        ;

y(Tx)                 =                      

x                        = ±√ [3.5 – ( 0.5 – x )/x2]                      ; second pair

————————————————————

First Pair: TSELIT

KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 L37

 

 

Modern Academy does not Recognize — give Credit to — Nature. Why? Please share:

Internal mechanics of mathematics — apparently no human hand has made any of its innate logic and no other either, what we know. We get it for free: it is here to help. But there are some aces suggesting otherwise.

•   Any Site, Page, Domain @Internet even THINKING of locking any one person out and away from science, mathematics, physics, in even Attempting to introduce a dictated apparently stupidized agenda on social intercourse with such idiot phrases as LOG IN and the like; please share That Inducement — EDUCATE US — for such a very apparently direct Cosmic Deep Fucked up Idea, so that all the fine upstanding rest of humanity’s assholes also can enjoy the common idea of ”.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. Say again.

 

DELPHI(4):

 

 

Exexution time ”0mS”: less than 1mS. D, used number of significant decimals. Se DelphiTSELITprogram.

 

MATHEMATICS IS DISCOVERED — NOT CREATED — does modern academic PhDs have a Problem with that? Apparently, yes. See quote below.

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

 

Mathematics’ five foundational laws — how the whole story began .. The Term has no here known modern academic correspondence.

 

WHY IS IT THAT Modern Academy does not Recognize — give Credit to — Nature. Why? Please share:

Children and Animals can handle it, gallantly. How about the rest?

 

Fascistic Ideation — no HumanRight mentioning — by DRIFT. Not plan.

EXAMPLE:

 

”Människan har skapat matematiken, därom är alla lärde överens”,

Sveriges Radio Vetandets Värld 25 mars 1988:

Swedish Radio [Program 1]: Knowing’s World, 25Mar1988

 

translated:

Modern Swedish Academic Standard:

Man has created mathematics,

thereof are in agreement all the educated.

 

Is it not such a joy to share Math with these wonderfully cosmologically assembled aces.

Say. Educated. Very high IQ. MustBuyBook.

 

 

Not one word HumanRight. The only existent Knowledge Domain: gravitation. electricity: LIFE. ”.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..”. Not a sound. Not a hint. Not a spell.    Modern Academy 1800+   . It is such a joy to share Math with these aces. ”..  to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall  .. ”.  — What — Swedish state administrations and other? Do say.

   Mathematics: LIFE. Every single peace of it. Isn’t that just gorgeously wonderful. Say: Not a spell. — Do you see any? Do tell.

   Educated. High IQ. MustBuyBook.

•   Modern academy (1800+) did not what we know of make a proclamation that the aim was to develop a general cosmological stupidity. No sir. No way. So: How come nothing else shows up from those quarters? Do tell. State administrations — that SHOULD be »on the top of everything: only the best of the best: well educated, wise, alert, strong». In practice: a veritable pandemic sewer gushing violence. UN: Stop killing humanity.

 

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

 

Second Pair: TSELIT

KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 N37

 

 

Modern Academy does not Recognize — give Credit to — Nature. Why? Please share:

Internal mechanics of mathematics — apparently no human hand has made any of its innate logic and no other either, what we know. We get it for free: it is here to help. But there are some aces suggesting otherwise.

EX3: EX1 ¦ EX2

y = 0.125x3 – 1.5x + 0.5  = –4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x) ; = 0

 

The logarithmic part of this work was (by its time, 1991) just an author’s personal note to enhance the hang of it. It has no further significance in this presentation.

 

(EX3):

 

y1          = 0.125x3 – 1.5x + 0.5               ; = 0.5(0.25x3 – 3x + 1)

y2          = –4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x)          ;

y(Gx)    = y1 – y2

 

The yGx projects the number of summing graphical GINS intersection x-coordinates on the x-axis.

Graf Unit50 y = [(0.125x'3)–(1.5x)+0.5]+4/[(0.16x'3)+(0.8x)+(1/x)]

 

             = 0.5(0.25x3 – 3x + 1)  +  4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x)

             = 0                                                                       ;

 

From here: We try to — WE HAVE TO:  must — break up the y(Gx) expression — aiming at finding The appropriate self locking Iteration Equation y(Tx) with precise GINS values — in possible  (a±x)1 and (a±x)2 factors

(because it turns out that the optimal solutions have algebraic/arithmetic end stations on square ±roots or a single GINS):

 

–4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x) = 0.5(0.25x3 – 3x + 1)  ;

–8         = (0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x)(0.25x3 – 3x + 1)

             = 0.16x3(0.25x3 – 3x + 1) + 0.8x(0.25x3 – 3x + 1) + (1/x)(0.25x3 – 3x + 1)

             = (0.04x6 – 0.48x4 + 0.16x3) + (0.2x4 – 2.4x2 + 0.8x) + (0.25x2 – 3 + 1/x)

             =   0.04x6 – 0.48x4 + 0.16x3  + 0.2x4  – 2.4x2 + 0.8x  + 0.25x2  – 3  + 1/x

             =   0.04x6 – 0.48x4 + 0.16x3  + 0.2x4  – 2.4x2 + 0.8x  + 0.25x2  – 3  + 1/x  

             =   0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3  + 0.2x4  – 2.15x2 + 0.8x   0.25x2  – 3  + 1/x  

                          =   0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 – 2.15x2 + 0.8x – 3 + 1/x                  ;

0                        =   0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 – 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5 + 1/x                 ;

10x·0                 =   0.4x7 – 2.8x5 + 1.6x4 – 21.5x3 + 8x2 + 50x + 10                      ; = 0 ;

 

First Single: TSELIT  ¦  Ex3

0                        =   0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 – 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5 + 1/x                 ;

1/x                     = –(0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 – 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5)                      ;

                          = –(P)                                                                                           ;

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]                                                                 ;

y(Tx)                 =                      

x                        = –(P)–1                                                                                        ;

————————————————————

D4iTx: input Ex3 single:

0(i010)–1/[(0.04x'6)–(0.28x'4)+(0.16x'3)–(2.15x'2)+(0.8x)+5]

    ¦ readout x=-0.2112856838 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=10 ¦ Q=10 ¦ mS=0

D4iTx: input Ex3 pair1:

0(i010)±(1)[–(5+1/x)/[(0.04x'4)–(0.28x'2)+(0.16x)–(2.15)+(0.8/x)]]'0.5

+ ¦ readout x= 1.7194845338 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=10 ¦ Q=15 ¦ also works on @=1

— ¦ readout x=-1.1089220401 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=10 ¦ Q=13 ¦ also works on @=1

D4iTx: input Ex3 pair2:

0(i210)±(1)[7–(4/x)+[[2.15–[(5+1/x)/(x'2)]–(0.8/x)]/(0.04x'2)]]'0.5

+ ¦ readout x= 3.0380481368 ¦ @=2 ¦ D=10 ¦ Q=12 ¦ mS=0 ¦ also works on @=0

— ¦ readout x=-3.4959029277 ¦ @=2 ¦ D=10 ¦ Q=24 ¦ mS=0 ¦ also works on @=0

:

OpenOffice Calc:

Ex3   single =-1/(0,04*A10^6 - 0,28*A10^4 +0,16*A10^3 - 2,15*A10^2 + 0,8*A10 + 5)

±Ex3 pair1 = ROT(-(5+1/B10)/((0,04*B10^4 - 0,28*B10^2 +0,16*B10 - 2,15 + 0,8/B10)))

±Ex3 pair2 = ROT((2,15-((5+1/D10)/D10^2) - 0,8/D10)/(0,04*D10^2) + 7 - 4/D10)

 

KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 A8

 

First Pair: TSELIT  ¦  Ex3

0                        =   0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 – 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5 + 1/x                 ;

–(5 + 1/x)          =   0.04x6 – 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 – 2.15x2 + 0.8x                                ;

                          =   x2(0.04x4 – 0.28x2 + 0.16x – 2.15 + 0.8/x)                             ;

                          =   x2(P)                                                                                       ;

x2                       = –(5 + 1/x)/(P)                                                                          ;

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]                                                                 ;

y(Tx)                 =                                                                                                   ;

x                        = ±√ –(5 + 1/x)/(P)                 ; first pair

---------------------------------

                    = 1.7194845338

                    =–1.1089220401

————————————————————

    

GrafUnit50 y = [–(5+1/x)/([0.04x'4]–[0.28x'2]+[0.16x]–[2.15]+[0.8/x])]'0.5

Second Pair: TSELIT  ¦  Ex3

–(5 + 1/x)/x2                                = 0.04x4 – 0.28x2 + 0.16x – 2.15 + 0.8/x             ;

–(5 + 1/x)/x2 + 2.15 – 0.8/x         = 0.04x4 – 0.28x2 + 0.16x                                    ;

                                                   = 0.04x2(x2 – 7 + 4/x)                                          ;

x2 – 7 + 4/x                                 = (2.15 – (5 + 1/x)/x2 – 0.8/x)/0.04x2                 ;

                          = (K)                                                                                          ;

x2                       = (K) + 7 – 4/x                                                                           ;

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form]                                                                 ;

y(Tx)                 =                                                ;

x                        = ±√ (K) + 7 – 4/x                  ; second pair

---------------------------------

                    = 3.0380481368

                    =-3.4959029277

————————————————————

 

GrafUnit50 y = [([2.15–([5+1/x]/x'2)–0.8/x]/0.04x'2)+7–4/x]'0.5

 

 

TheIterationTheorem

 

DelphiTSELITprogram: 12Feb2023

Delphi4TSELITprogram

 

•   Write in the equation in Delphi(4) code, then run the program (F9) and click on the form.

•   Answer is presented typically as shown below.

•   Add end code: ClipBoard.AsText:= Label1.Caption; — if a text clip copy is wanted.

•   //, momentarily suspended/inactivated program code:

•   {programmer’s design or comments}

 

procedure TForm1.FormClick(Sender: TObject);

var

  S:     string;

  x,z:   Real;

  A,N,D: Integer;

//dW:    DWord;

begin

 

    S:= '-Sqrt( (0.5-x)/(3.5-sqr(x)) )';{Delphi formula text}

    x:= 0; z:= 1; N:= 0; D:= 9;

//dW:= GetTickCount;

    for A:= 1 to 1000 do

    begin

      x:=

{.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0:}

      -Sqrt( (0.5-x)/(3.5-sqr(x)) );{Delphi formula}

{.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.}

      if Round((z-x)*Power(10,D)) = 0 then begin N:=A; Break; end;

      z:= x;

    end;

//dW:= GetTickCount - dW;

    x:= Round(z*Power(10,D))/Power(10,D);

    Label1.Caption:= FloatToStr(x)+' ¦ '+IntToStr(N)+ ' ¦ ' + S + ' ¦ D='+IntToStr(D);

// + '¦' + IntToStr(dW) + 'mS';

exit;

..

end;{endFormClick}

 

EX2:

 

x result               turns    equation                                       decimals

IN CERTAIN CASES another start value than x=0 might be needed (±1..).

(Additional program features, not worked out here).

 

 

IF WE DO IT THE RIGHT WAY, THE PARTIAL END RESULTS ALWAYS FAVOR A PROCEEDING CONTINUED ADVANCE — ALWAYS FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THE THINGS THAT EXIST: by natural principle

COMPARE THIS ISSUE: why is it that life chemistry apparently assembles life forms in such a way that these harmonize — not exclusively exterminates each other species — forming a general cyclic biological isotope? What’sUp? What is the innate natural mechanics for such an advanced assembling technique?

 

 

— And what The F Word means ”the right way”?

— The EXEMPLIFIED »Iterative Math way» (The Natural Brains Growth Way):

    The short version:

— »IF even thinking of TOUCHING ME AND I DON’T WANT THAT: vaporize».

   Natural Defense. Natural assembling technology: brains (»the foundation of constant joy»).

--------------------------------------

— IS any exception?

— Do you see any? Do tell.

Children and animals handles it gallantly: respect. HumanRight 24/7.

    Life Experience:

   It is NEVER what we want. No sir. It is ALWAYS the basic natural inspiration what can be done on premises already given (»general friendship»: sharing). Not to TAKE but to GIVE. Ex: An apple.

--------------------------------------

 

Added to DELPHI4Test2022

Procedure ExecuteGraphEquation(Shift: TShiftState) ¦ Unit2 ¦ r792 ¦;

 

            {12Feb2023¦Iterations¦r70¦r701¦r960¦r971¦:}

            if Iteration then

            begin

              {RepeatEquationGraph ¦ Xr:= rN :}

              z:= 1; Q:= 1;

              dW:= GetTickCount;

              for A:= 2 to 1000 do

              begin

                Inc(Q);

          {.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0:}

                EquationGraph;

          {.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.·°ºOo0.}

                if Round((z-rN)*Power(10,D))=0 then Break;

                z:= rN;

              end;{endFor}

              z:= Round(rN*Power(10,D))/Power(10,D);

              dW:= GetTickCount-dW;

              Label1.Caption:=

              'x='           +

              FloatToStr(z)  + ' ¦ ' +

              '@='           +

              FloatToStr(iT) + ' ¦ ' +

              'D='           +

              IntToStr(D)    + ' ¦ ' +

              'Q='           +

              IntToStr(Q)    + ' ¦ ' +

              'mS='          +

              IntToStr(dW)   + ' ¦ ' +

              Edit4.Text     + ' ';

              if GetKeyState(VK_CAPITAL)=1 then

              ClipBoard.AsText:= Label1.Caption;    

              exit;

            end;{endIterate}

 

NQ should be the same

Additional code on a few other places ..

FUNCTION(ex):

 

 See D4 iTx Example — THE DELPHI WAY:

IF ANY EXTRACTED ITERATION EQUATION y(Tx) : WRITE IT IN — RUN THE RESULT DIRECTLY

 EXECUTE NORMALLY BY F11

CAPS LOCK ON: TEXTRESULT STATUS TO CLIPBOARD

 

We already have a well working developed graph drawing program in Delphi4Test2022. So: IF we can break in some appropriate additional code, we can use the already working graphic equation standard, with some minor additive writing — channeling the program route of the operation type: normal or iterative.

 

we don’t have to rewrite the solving iterating equation expression explicitly,

as it already is the drawing one

 

 

TheIterationTheorem

 

MACex:

 

MODERN ACADEMIC ROOT TERMINOLOGY EXAMPLE

Comparing modern academic and related mathematics basic concepts

 

The book source below exemplifies on (not illustrated) the equation 

y = x3 – 3x2 + 4:

 

We clearly see that the y-function touches the x-axis in only two GINS (Graphical Intersection point):

•   The x-solving root of the function’s GINS are –1 and 2:

0 = x3 – 3x2 + 4 ;  x(x2 – 3x) +4 ;  x(x2 – 3x) = –4 ;  x2+4/x = 3x ;  x = (x2 + 4/x)/3 ;

x = –4/(x2 – 3x)              =   2 ;   (2)2= 0/(x+1) = 0 ; x =   2 ¦ 2 = ±0 = 0 ;  one single GINS — two ESYS : modern math theory ideas

x =  (x2 + 4/x)/3              = –1 ;   x + 1 = 0/(2)2 = 0 ; x = –1

•   Note that the first x form above –4/(x2 – 3x) also works as an Iterator equation: it DIRECTLY on one single turn and operation satisfies BOTH THE TWO DIFFERENT GINS on IterationStartInput ±1:

•   StartIterate +1 gives result +2 — endlessly.

•   StartIterate –1 gives result –1 — endlessly.

The Iterating Function:

y = –4/(x2 – 3x) : Both GINS have the same 45° tangent slope — directly Through each GINS — meaning: »a direct iterative hit»:

 

 

”  Tredjegradsekvationen x3 – 3x2 + 4 = 0 kan skrivas (x–2)2·(x+1) = 0; alltså är 2 en dubbelrot och –1 en enkelrot

THE CRESCENT DICTIONARY OF MATHEMATICS, 1962:  W. Karush ¦ Sw., MATEMATIKLEXIKON, Wahlström&Widstrands 1991, s296sp1n (multipelrot, eng. multiple root).

translated:

The third degree equation x3 – 3x + 4 = 0 can be written (x–2)2·(x+1) = 0; hence is 2 a double root and –1 a single root.

 

The quoted source certifies the example;

 

•   On comparing a GINS (Graphical Intersection point) this modern nomenclature of a ROOT (solution: »a single intersecting point») differs from a direct visual (graphical) root point — and can be misleading and frustrating unless familiar:

 

•   the established term ”double root” concerns an algebraic general method nomenclature of solving general nth degree equations (a nomenclature that, apparently, must stay put)

— while the ”root” as a single graphical xy point has no double conceptual nature.

 

 

AS FAR AS HERE INVESTIGATED on a few hours InternetSearch — THESE ITERATION NOTES AND PROPERTIES ARE NOT FOUND IN PRESENT ESTABLISHED LITERATURE

On the other hand: the subject is Huge — and most often buried in a terminology understandable in time like traveling from New York to Japan

— taking the walking path over Alaska.

 

— Oh yes:

FOUND. It is conventionally termed

FIX POINT ITERATION METHOD.

Wikipedia has a specific article (partly poorly illustrated — at present: However, the principle is clearly exhibited).

 

 

TheIterationTheorem

 

TseliT: —  TheIteratorMechanics¦ DelphiTSELITprogram ¦  TheIterationTheorem ¦  EX1 ¦

 

 FUNCTIONAL INTERSECTIONS

THE SELF LOCKING iterative ITERATING Iteration THEOREM

 as discovered during the works on drawing curves manually and calculating, analyzing and dissecting  their properties

[  many other persons have most likely experienced similiar discoveries during the history of mathematics ]

•   compare the Parabola y = x² on the Iterator y=x; x = x²; GINS x=1

•   and directly all other first quadrant — everything between the positive xy-axes —functions with the Iterator.

 

 

TheIteratorMechanics¦

 

Each expressible mathematical function which is so POSITIONED in the 2D xy-plane as to INTERSECT — touch — the ITERATOR line y=x (The ITERATOR)

•   generates automatically functional results as variable inputs

 

— same elementary form y=x

— in a consecutive convergent repeated progress — with no end.

— »The more we talk, the more we understand». Sometimes, yes. Not always.

 

ON WHAT SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS IS IT USEFUL?

 

•   General signal — wave mechanics — analysis: intersecting wave points;

•   Transient/shock wave interfering mechanics;

•   General Morphological Design Issues: intersecting fronts;

•   General exercise on partly algebraic and partly numeric solutions to nth degree equations — also including integral, derivative and differential calculus, provided the student is sufficiently interested and motivated (time consuming, it is).

 

TSELIT: THE SELF locking IterationTHEOREM

HOW IS SUCH AN TseliT ARRANGEMENT MADE?

 

•   We have two or more different y-equations sharing one or several same x coordinates

y1 = y2 ;

•   Sum y1 – y2 = 0 with a new x-intersection reporting function

y(Gx) = y1 – y2 : this function reports all the Graphically intersecting points on their x-coordinates as y=0 ditto intersections with the x-axis; 

use a graph drawing tool to familiarize on the y(Gx).

•   NOW COMES THE DECISIVE PART finding the actual TseliT equations:

— SPLIT — algebraically the y(Gx)-expression into one single one degree factor (a±x)1 and one or several (b±x)2 two degree factors. WHEN SO DONE:

•   Equations of ODD  degree 1 3 5 7 9 .. have one (a±x)1 and the rest on type (b±x)2;

•   Equations of EVEN degree 2 4 6 8    .. have only the type (b±x)2..(c±x)2..(d±x)2.. ;

and it is for us to find those end station algebraic expressions. IT SHOULD NOT BE THE WORLD’S MOST DIFFICULT TASK: basic reckoning laws — good for refreshing practice.

•   Use a spread sheet (Free OpenOffice), write in the equation in a first column cell, and let the following cells in the same column use the nearest above result for generating new ones — until the desired number of fix decimals is achieved.

    Some fully illustrated examples are given in EX123: a 3rd, 4th and a 7th degree equation is fully exemplified on full account on the above given points

— by detail (we leave no one behind).

 

 

WHERE DO WE FIND SOMETHING SIMILAR @INTERNET TODAY(Feb2023)?

 

First — no direct keyword to search for:

Nothing at all found of the above illustrated kind @Internet 10Feb2023. Not even close.

The established textbooks (Crescent dictionary of mathematics mentions nothing of the kind) seem all to handle the subject iterations on MATRIX ALGEBRA: just combinatorial algebra. No visual curvatures, no such mentioning.

 

Results show up first when searching Images/Pictures:

— Oh yes. There is a HEAP of it under the name

FIX POINT ITERATION METHOD

essentially explaining (by illustrations) the functional principle: the here named Iterator’s iterating numerically convergent generating 45° xy-tangent line.

 

The observations on the principle in this presentation is based only on this author’s works (1987-1994) — previous to the proceeding historical commercial computer epoch (Compaq Presario with Windows 3.1, 1994, maybe the first really commercial break through computer with precision printing/plotting capabilities: 33MHz CPU, 200MB hard disk, CRT monitor).

 

 

TheIterationTheorem

 

TheIteratorMechanics: —  TIT ¦ EX1 ¦ EX2 ¦ EX3 ¦ TheSINE ¦ DelphiTSELITprogram

 

 

THE ITERATOR MECHANICS

Author’s Archive 1987-1991

Author’s Archive 1987-1991

IT WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE MANY CURVY OBSESSED EXPEDITIONS

— never really seen in any library literature at the time.

 

Today [Feb2023 @Internet] the subject — under different descriptions — is found as:

FIX POINT ITERATION METHOD.

With those references we might find some telling historical corner stones on what is known.

 

DESCRIPTION

FAST OR SLOW convergent (→←) or divergent (←→) iterations appear as a given iteration equation cuts, touches or intersects one or several (so called) root points, the actual numeric solution we seek. Which is what depends on the SLOPE towards The Iterator — the actual fix y=x=tan45° straight slope line.

 

 

The functional root point SLOPE — the actual root point’s functional tangent or gradient — determines whether the root point — our solution — is iteratively possible. It so is if the functional root point’s Slope lies inside the shaded iterative domain cone ±45°. If outside, the iteration process will recede with still growing difference between the successively iterated numerical values.

 

Illustration

If we idealized consider an arbitrary root point along The fix y=x Iterator — where the root point's region approaches zero (the above synthesized illustration), we see the morphological form for all possible iteration functions via a small section — functional tangent slope — of the actual function's slope passing through the root point.

 

Through these different sloping straight line sections relative the fix y=x, we can understand some basics in how, partly, the function is convergent or divergent. And partly whether the iterating quantities are generated fast or slow.

 

On studying these aspects and details it is so found that a function is iteratively convergent — a solution definitely exists — if the root point function's tangent slope lies within ±45° — the shaded region domain. The convergence is then most fast around 0° (horizontal). For all other cases the function is divergent, highest rate at 90° (vertical).

 

 

TheIteratorMechanics

 

IterationTECH: EX123

 

ITERATION TECHNIQUES

Precise decimal values on intersecting graphical xy points between several interfering graphical functions

THE MOST SIMPLE METHOD — NO DIRECT NEED FOR ALGEBRAIC BREAK OUT JOB — same end result

TOOLS: 0. a computer. — 1. a simple graph drawing program. — 2. Free OpenOffice Spread Sheet program. — 3. Some basic familiarity with basic math [ we grow with its practice ..].

 

 

Intersecting

GRAPHICAL FUNCTIONS: taking out the intersecting points

————————————

y1          = GF1

y2          = GF2

y(Gx)    = ( y1 = y2)  = 0            ; ¦ collects all Graphically INterSecting GINS point x-coordinates on the x-axis:

             = ( y1 – y2)  = 0            ;

y(Tx)     = x = algebraically developed isolated x — a self locking iteration equation gives precise decimals:

             = precise decimal numerical x-coordinate values for the intersecting points

alternatively:

•   Read out the rounded (1 or 2 decimal) approximated x-coordinates from the y(Gx) function;

•   Use a spread sheet program (Free OpenOffice) to manually iterate the more precise values;

•   Type example: (»manual y[Tx]»)

GenEXManualIterations: IterationTECH

 

The Delphi4Test2022 graph drawing program has automated Absolute features for root types — so we don’t have to spend extra time to find out what was excluded: When writing in and drawing the circle’s and ellipsis equations, we will also see the hyperbolic parts.

 

•   Write in each specific rounded y(Gx) value in a specific cell (A3 ¦ B3);

•   Write in the y(Gx) (absolute if roots) form in each corresponding column cell (A2 ¦ B2)

 

cellA2:    =ROT(ABS(1 -  A1^2)) - 0,5*ROT(ABS(1-2*A1^2/3)) ¦ OpenOffice Swedish version

copy and paste cellA2 into cellB2 — the program automatically adjusts to:

cellB2:    =ROT(ABS(1 -  B1^2)) - 0,5*ROT(ABS(1-2*B1^2/3))

 

cellA1:

•   Use (copy) A3 for start:

— Proceed with testing — manually iterating — the numbers in A1 until A2 = 0.00000..

   Ctrl+Shift+F2 or Click in the top window code  bar, adjust, Enter — a new result appears. Repeat.

— A2 will shift between a positive and a negative above/below 0 during the iteration

— until all zeroes (determine a fix cell number of decimals in the [OpenOffice: Ctrl+1, select ..]).

•   Repeat on cellB1 (and as many others as included).

•   It will take a minute — or 10, depending on practice — for each [10 decimal] iteration end result.

 

PREFIXxSIN:

Basic trigonometric terms: WITH  sin the angle A°  is expressed as  ArcSine A°, here asin — and alike for all the others:

•   Easy to recall and remember — sine ¦ cosine ¦ tangent  (sin cos tan) — inverted as secans ¦ cosecans ¦ cotangent (sec csc cot).

•   With this very straight and easy to remember PREFIXxSIN chart the only remaining to do in order to Get The Conventional Established nomenclature will be:

•   READ/switch/use the established PREFIXxCOS nomenclature LABELS cos sin ¦  as the PREFIXxSIN related mathematics sin cos. There is no more to it.

———————————————

PREFIXxSIN ¦ Related Complex Algebra ¦ Trigonometric Expressions — Basic — General — Swedish edition only¦ secans function MATEMATIKLEXIKON s381 ”sec x = 1 / cos x”.

•   The thing is: we are broad sighted · · . And it is natural for us to select a primary preference as such: the horizon —— the Sine.

•   Then we take everything else from there. Related mathematics and physics. That was how it all started (1976).

 

 

FOR THOSE WHO DARE TO PRACTICE A MORE ALGEBRAIC APPROACH — but perhaps more time demanding than the simple and fast above

ADDITIONAL ITERATION EXAMPLES

 

INTERSECTION CIRCLE ELLIPS (HYPERBOLA ¦ + 2 outer points)

nothe the drawing program’s special features — negative root values are presented as well — as positive ditto — so we get »optimalALL times»

 

y1          = √(1–x2)                                   ; Circle

y2          = 0.5√(1–2x2/3)                         ; Ellipse ¦ 0 = 0.5√(1–2x²/3) = 1–2x²/3 ;  x = √ 3/2 = Md elliptic major distance [CircleRadius]

y(Gx)    = y1 – y2

collected x-projecting GINS on x-axis by x-coordinates:

 

             = √(1–x2) – 0.5√(1–2x2/3)        

             = 0                                             ;

First Pair: TSELIT

inner pair

√(1–x2) = 0.5√(1–2x2/3)                         ;

x2      = 0.25(1–2x2/3)                          ;

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form] ; if found: always gives a precision decimal value:

y(Tx)     =                      

 

x            = ±√ 1 – 0.25(1–2x2/3)              ; Iterator’s input: 0 — but any number counts — fastest from 0

             = ± 0.948683298                       ;

————————————————————

Second Pair: TSELIT                                                                                                            ; tedious — on yet unknown conditions:

outer pair

x2      = 0.25(1–2x2/3)                          ;

1–2x2/3 = 0.25/(1–x2)                              ;

2x2/3     = 1 – 0.25/(1–x2)                        ;

x2          = 3[1 – 0.25/(1–x2)]/2               ;

————————————————————

; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterator’s x form] ; if found: always gives a precision decimal value:

y(Tx)     =                      

x            = ±√ 3[1 – 0.25/(1–x2)]/2         ;

             = 1.3825475861                        ; no such found ¦ 34 turns OpenOffice

————————————————————

x            = ±√ 3[1 + 0.25/(1–x2)]/2         ;

             = ± 1.035098339                       ;

————————————————————

 

solved on not yet known conditions — the arithmetics results seem to be smarter than the author ..

The y(Tx) picture on an inner positive adjusted sign .. 1 + .. (general hyperbolic from circle .. 1 – ..)

After the second iterative turn, the rest of the values goes bazooka — leaving only two initial relevant answers. The first 1.37 is verified as part of the actual y(Tx) as above. And the second — 1.035 apparently unrepresented in the y(Tx) that defines it, however in an aftermath peek — verified by the y2-ellipse (in general elliptic equations). It seems like a riddle, and there is no answer to it at this stage. However: all the four intersection points were found by precise decimals.

A short peek on all graphical combinations — some 8 slightly different graphs — with alternative ± signs in the iteration root: still no representation of the x-coordinate 1.035. Where is it? The  yTx  takes it — strangely — but does not show it. The cell Error cause:  negative root content.

 

a                        = 1.035098339

                          = √ 3[1 + 0.25/(1–x2)]/2 ;

2a2/3                  = 1 + 0.25/(1–x2)           ;

2a2/3 – 1            = 0.25/(1–x2)                 ;

4(2a2/3 – 1)       = 1/(1–x2)                      ;

x2                   = 1/4(2a2/3 – 1)             ;

x2                       = 1 – 1/4(2a2/3 – 1)       ;

x                        = √ 1 – 1/4(2a2/3 – 1)   ;

                          = 1.3693063938            ; y(Tx) bottom ¦ x² = 1.875 ¦ yet unknown conditions

-------------------------------------------------

y2                       = 0.5√(1–2a2/3)

                          = 0.2672612419           ; ellipse verified ¦ y-coordinate for the x=a-coordinate

-------------------------------------------------

TheSINE:

THE SINE

Iterator Iteration techniques

TheSine — in PREFIXxSIN:

 

   

 

As all the sine .. have one and the same y=x intersection — with  lower amplitudes the more sine — the faster the iterations reach the fixed decimal precision where the iteration begins @0.

 

 

y1          = GF1 = sinx                            ; Sine — PREFIXxSIN

y2          = GF2                           = x        ; y2 could also be used as = x in this example ;

y1          = y2                                ;

sinx       = x                                 ;

y(Gx)    = ( y1 = y2)                   = 0       ; ¦ collects all Graphically INterSecting GINS point x-coordinates on the x-axis:

             = ( y1 – y2)                    = 0       ;

             = ( sinx – x)                  = 0       ;

 

 

 

sinx                    = x                                 ;

x                        = asinx                          ;

sinx                    = asinx                          ;

sin(sinx)            = x                                 ; in Delphi4Test2022 DrawGraph also written as: sinsinx

See also further below in ArcSine

-------------------------------------------------

y(Tx)     = algebraically developed isolated x — a self locking iteration equation gives precise decimals:

algebraically developed  y(Tx):                                      -------------------------------------------------

y(Tx)     = x                                              ;

x            = sinx                                         ; x in radians:

             = 0.739085133                          ; 42.34645882°

————————————————————

OpenOffice Calc:

KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 G7

Delphi4IntegratedIterationsTx:

D4iTx: input sine:

0(i09)+sinx

    ¦ readout x=0.739085133 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=55 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+sinx

0(i09)+sinsinx

    ¦ readout x=0.739085133 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=27 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+sinsinx

0(i09)+sinsinsinx

    ¦ readout x=0.739085133 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=19 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+sinsinsinx

 

 

The Delphi4Test2022 graph drawing program can handle the successive sine as shown. In ordinary (commercial) version the input would (most likely) have to be written with parenthesis sin(sin(sin(x))).

 

ArcSine — asinx

The same order of iteration solution does however NOT hold for (the same order of) the corresponding asin expressions — although there is a GINS — by the same value (y=x=0.739085133):

 

sinx ¦ asinx ¦ x

 

The corresponding y(Gx) is divergent. The more number of iterative turns, the farther away from the point.

 

asinx ¦ x — no response: divergent results

•   cannot be iterated

•   has no convergent iterative connection

 

BUT IT HAS AN ARITHMETICAL CORRESPONDING VALUE:

asinx = x = 0.739085133.... really

any definite decimal value we give for an iterative input, the result diverges with further iterations.

asinx = x = 0.739085133.. = sinx :

 

IN TRIGONOMETRY (PREFIXxSIN) it holds that: With sinA=x it holds that A=asinx. Compare (in radians):

With sinA=0.739085133.. it holds that A=asinx (scientific calculator) = 0.739085133.. .

IN TRIGONOMETRY (PREFIXxSIN) it holds that: With A=sinx it holds that asinA=x. Compare (in radians):

With A=0.739085133.. it holds that sin0.739085133..= 0.739085133..  — so then even asinx (scientific calculator) = sinx = 0.739085133.. .

COMPARE IN DEGREES:

sin(0.739085133.. · 180/π = 42.34645882 ..°) = 0.739085133.. .

asin(0.739085133..) = 42.34645882 ..° = 0.739085133.. RAD . [ We have to live with it .. there is no escape ..:  basic geometrical mathematics ].

 

 

The solution to asinx = x is sinx : x = sinx in PREFIXxSIN.

 

As experienced:

In general: IF we Expect some response from the math side, we have to — frequently — refresh on the basics. Otherwise: it’s all hieroglyphs. All the time. No exception.

Best method: forget. All of it. And then: inspect where the need is the strongest. That’s it.

 

The arcsine

The arcsine — of the sine (in regular units):

PREFIXxSIN

Ctrl+P generates »the pi sign» in the Delphi4Test2022 graph drawing program [ ASCII Alt+0222 Þ ]

 

 

y = arcsin(sinx) = ±x  (on periodic conditions) :

the math program uses RADIANS [ 1 Rad = 360/2pi = 180/pi = 57.3° rounded ] by default when calculating on trigonometric operators.

 

 

;

 

By extending (→) the variable x (n numerically) endlessly

(∞: the quantity independent in related mathematics),

the expression takes the form

 

y = (n→∞)arcsin[sin x/(n→∞)] = √([–x]2)

A general x division with a quantity >1 enlarges the x-scale dimension: »view more of x»

 

 

y = (n→∞)arcsin[sin x/(n→∞)] = √([–x]2)

 

 

y/(n→∞) = arcsin[sin x/(n→∞)] = √([–x]2) / (n→∞) = Δy = Δx

•   Because modern academy (1800+) has other inducements in mathematics

(PhysicsFIRST: ”Δx=dx”)

•   the above rank expression has no representation in modern corridors.

 

------------------------------------

 

y1                       = sinx                            ; Sine — PREFIXxSIN

y2                       = x                                 ; TheIterator y=x

y1                       = y2                                ;

 

sinx                    = x                                 ;

x                        = asinx                          ;

 

sinx                    = asinx                          ;

sin(sinx)            = x                                 ;

————————————————————

x            = sin(sinx)                                 ; Input 0  or any number

             = 0.7390851332                        ; 26turns OpenOfficeCALC

————————————————————

x            = sin(sin(sin(sinx)))                  ; Input 0  or any number ¦ faster: 15 turns

————————————————————

 

 

TheSINE

 

TheREVELATION: Compilation 18Feb2023 — see also here The BETA factor ¦ Continue From EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS

 

 

 

 

Related physics and mathematics

WITH a deduced — related — understanding of THE QUANTITY INDEPENDENT (∞) in

 

———————————————

The Quantity Independent — MasterUNIT ¦ TNED ¦ Euler Equivalents ¦ PhysicsFIRST ¦ — How many vertical side lengths are there in this square  ? Answer: quantity independent.

— We can clearly see — apprehend, understand: comprehend — the line with thickness dx. But it has no physical dimension or representation. So: Where is it, modern PhD? Say. Please share.

 

mathematics and physics (PhysicsFIRST) — it is not so mentioned or termed in established corridors

 

Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN :

by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the rank’s equivalent simple meaning: endless supply on limitless extension

although the concept is frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN] calculus:

— The K-cell — our universe in related physics — has a gravitational center [see TheGreatAndromedaTest],

a statement itself burying modern academic cosmology theory for good. Every single detail.

The results in CHART1 is the end picture in that test complex.

•   Modern academy 1800+ invented an idea that our cosmical existence is based on a LIMITED mass:

•   HumanRight — gravitation, electricity, basic math as deduced:  suspended. Not even recognized.

•   A Paradise Entrance for Unproclaimed Dictating Nazistic Fascistic Satanism:

•   decision, consensus, authority — outside human right recognition. Please be seated. Welcome.

   And so it became, and so it started.

   The populated state administrative instances does not even understand the concept — the nomenclature.

 

— we can further recognize (GripDeep) that

 

Gravitation works equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from: hence independent of time.

LIGHT works different for all matter, CAN be shielded from, and hence is time dependent.

Not present formulations in established corridors: related physics and mathematics:

 

•   light is not gravitation = mass: LIGHT IS MASSLESS = GRAVITATION-LESS — completely centrifugally dead.

•     light = no kinetics. No way. Give us the argument against — and we will surrender immediately. Absolutely.

   c and v are not additive in physics. Any such claim or idea, leads to fundamental misconceptions — culture crash.

By DRIFT. Not plan. Say.

 

light physics does not connect kinetics TheSolarEclipses

light does not develop centrifugation

light is massless

 

LIFE — our only known Knowledge Domain as in HumanRight— has only two components:

 

gravitation — mechanics, kinetics

electricity — light, heat, magnetism:

LIFE ¦ Nature ¦ Physics — what it consists of, how it is assembled, organized and maintained

 

THE REVELATION

 200 years of science history 1800+

 

•   AllKeplerMath

•   The ROUTE

basic statement:

The entire cosmological  physics is explained in every mathematical detail

•   on classic Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics — with no exception. Please do try to disclaim: Searched for. None yet found :

single proof:

•   Every detailed part of the cosmological appearance, from microscopic to macroscopic with no single exception, is based on a detailed and perfectly concordant, relatable, explainable down to last atom and deducible mathematical foundation with the Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics. But

•   which was never allowed to be perfected in established quarters (1800+);

•   That so, because the academic establishment of its time began to develope derogating ideas about the Logical Status of the Kepler-Galilei-Newton foundational basics. Then from a rough 1900+

•   — adopting the theory of relativity — modern thinking suggested the Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics to be of a lower, more primitive order of human ideation :

•   On claiming a new interpretation of How to State The Fundamentals of phenomenal physics

 

— including the apparent modern academic invention of ”inertial system”

EINSTEIN’S GENERAL RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE  —  see EinsteinCitat14

— with accompanying suggestions that its foundation should have been invented or introduced by Newton on concepts such as »absolute space» and »absolute time»,

— despite Newton’s own disclaiming on such concepts,

”For it may be that there is no body really at rest, to which the places and motions of others may be referred.”,

Isaac Newton PRINCIPIA 1687 —  SCHOLIUM IV Absolute motion

 

and the accompanying mathematics explaining the instrumental measurable observations, modern academy (1900+) apparently overgave physics as solely founded on Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics.

 

The first real observational proof of light’s gravitational dependency (LGD) came with James Bradley (1725, publ. 1729) — on the discovery of The Aberration effect. But it was never observed as such. And neither, what is known here, discussed or even mentioned in even close such terms: not at all.

 

The academic population 1800+ were apparently no scientists.

— Maybe at most »a hyenic mob» of cosmologically assembled fuckups:

 

A suitable picture of the 1800s established scientific community and its level of ideation, we have from its confrontation with Ludwig Boltzmann. When hearing his proposals that all matter consists of ATOMS, Boltzmann was bullied by the scientific establishment of his time (in such content that Boltzmann the year 1906 committed suicide, see collection of Boltzmann quotes, ”.. just before experiment verified his work”).

   SPIT from a low level community really can break a human being down to the bone — or make it stronger enough to spit back, resist the bulling, and drive the mob back into the abyss from where it came.

the point:

Related physics marker:

IF — as so stated above, and as so advocated by existing detailed proof —

•   instrumental observations have explaining mathematical physics, that mathematics inevitably, irrevocably and unequivocally must relate unambiguously to the Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics — whether accepted or denied, known or unknown, whether so proclaimed, or not, one way or the other. No exception.

 

•   So prominently the experiments of Michelson and Morley (1881) unequivocally did clarify that

•   c and v are not additive — light velocity does not connect kinetics, hence

•   only confirming the Bradley discovered Aberration effect physics (which apparently nobody in scientific corridors even reflected on, and still no response).

•   Despite the M&M results, modern academy adopted Einsteins v+ic error statements, defining and deducing the special relativity basic equations.

•   At that time (1880+) — and ever since after — modern academy teaching system never was able to deduce THE ELECTRIC CHARGE — and thereby reach the proper explaining phenomenal physics through the mathematical ranks in THE PLANCK EQUIVALENTS — a late term coined here (some 2000+) in UniverseHistory (1976+):

•   Neither was The Potential Barrier deduced by the same reason: modern academy’s cheer for relativity theory sealed all doors and portals and blocked the paths for finding the true explanations to these basic Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics foundations: gravitation and electricity (light, heat).

   And so it became how HumanRight was kicked down (as related): the only existent knowledge domain: gravitation, electricity: LIFE. Nature.

   Our present HumanRight situation Feb2023:

•   not recognized as such in modern academic quarters. Say:

•   WORLD GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSE: education, merits, community,

•   social intercourse. Not recognized. Not one word. Cookies. Human right intrusion:

— If caring for privacy, how come constantly interrupted without permission?

   Test answer:

— Because we live in a time where communication is run by electronics, and there are some specially cosmologically assembled fuckups — world jurisdiction — having copyrighted the electromagnetic streaming as if a privately owned property with MasterInformsCattle. Not one word humanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.

   Violence is gushing out of it.

 

”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”

— Instead of recognizing It (”.. recognition of the inherited dignity .. as the foundation of ..”), modern academy started to derogate It, promoting Majority Decisions instead of Global Academic Recognitions. Meaning: destructive history. No exception. No way.

 

•   And so, modern academy missed the entire cosmological foundational corner stone: the atomic nucleus (Planck constant h= mcr), gravitation’s fundamental form:

— The Planck Ring — The Neutron — and its (2003 — PaintBrush) accompanying THE NEUTRON  SQUARE giving the matrix mathematics morphology (elliptic equations) — leading to ATOMIC MASSES: Practically identical with the experimentally measured. Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics apparently outclasses the modern academic corresponding nuclear theory foundation (based on nuclear — not atomic — mass defects). Detailed down to the last cosmic atom.

 

Related physics (now, here Feb2023 [Begin: 1976]) rewind the modern academy history on these details, by recalling — under the (now, related physics complete) revealed Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics — the experimental confirmations:

•   all the most prominent instrumental observations associated with modern academy’s continued cheer over relativity theory, claiming credit for the phenomenal explanations

— on same formal mathematical ranks. See the Jan2023 compiled articles from EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS (Perihelion Precessions, Solar Eclipses, Planck Equivalents [the mass increase of the electrically accelerated electron], Multiple c, and others).

The Real Steel Point:

The related physics central cosmological proving point:

•   The ENERGY INPUT behind the planetary Perihelion Precession Phenomena:

•   IT preserves, conserves, and verifies the planetary Kepler Momentum mathematics (K=vr) —

•   including a (at present) 14 decimal precision value for G (gravitation constant) and the Sun mass (mS), based on

•   a Sun photometric IAU vale test (3.8275 T26 W ± 0.0014) with a preserved alike 14 decimal precision preservation (3.82750000000000), including

•   a general related physics cosmological parametric test including the general cosmic Planck heat background radiation (CMB-details) 2.75°K (and others), yearning

•   The CHART1 perihelion precession result

 

 

•   which present modern academic efforts cannot reach — no matter the computation power. No way — we dare say on the named premises.

•   Present academic skills cannot calculate (or even measure, significantly as observed [see related text to CHART1]: not safely determine) the ANOMALISTIC period of (even) Earth’s Kepler orbit around our Sun;

   Why not? Because, apparently and provably (derogating the Kepler-Galilei-Newton fundamentals, as mentioned):

 

Modern academic relativity theory has no Kepler Anomalistic.

IT DOES NOT EXIST.

•   It excludes relativity theory completely.

 

•   Present academic skills use SIDEREAL (»absolute star time») PERIODS to — arbitrarily (”for best fit) — use the (so, found) most convenient numbers to match the real related physics Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics deduced and related mathematics. But there is no sidereal aspect at all in AllKeplerMath — what modern academy lay claim to:

•   The CHART1 perihelion precession related physics result

•   as deduced in AllKeplerMath.

   Dodge that one, anyone who can.

    

   Bottom line:

   That leaves the entire relativity theory on the level of extinction (as a never proclaimed — by drift, not plan — fraudulent misconception of physics that no serious scientist ever should have recognized) — completely: all branches, all parts, no exceptions: AllKeplerMath — no relativity theory concepts:

 

every cosmological detail is mathematically perfectly explained from a Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics standpoint — never so perfected by modern academy due to its apparent blind cheer for relativity theory — basically simple and straight, no big deal.

———————————————

Al lKepler Math ¦ The ROUTE ¦ TNED ¦ From Internet@2008 — all basic Swedish editions — TNEDbegin1993:

K-cell Heat Physics ¦ Star Physics — Part1: Mechanics —  Part 2: Classification ¦ GRB Objects¦ The K-cell Inner physics — Dark matter — Gravitational redshift, »dark energy» in modern corridors¦

 

Completely outclassed by simple basic Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics — That Which modern academic ideation apparently and so provably never allowed a passage for, instead blocking all possible paths for the cheer of relativity theory.

Shortly after The Detonation — schematically illustrated on the Neutron’s incompressible density maximum tight packed atomic nuclei 1.82 T17 KG/M³ Dmax

The central eternally 670Gy pulsating K-cell Universe in the endlessly surrounding Neutron c0-body — as explained by The Revelation gravitation energy equivalent

and the accompanying deduced, tested and verified concordant mathematical physics — based on the works of Kepler, Galilei, Newton, Bradley, Euler and Planck.

•   Planck constant h=mcr — The Neutron — never created, the foundation of cosmological existence: the fundamental form of gravitation — already standing on a Zero

 

The only available PERIHELION PRECESSIONAL ENERGY INPUT to be delivered onto the already Kepler established orbital area momentum works so, as deduced:

 

THE SOLAR SYSTEMS IN MILKY WAY

 

 

•   First — from a Neutron Dmax (1.82 T17 KG/M³) general solid state situation — before any sunlight did appear (it takes some TIME for a star to start up and establish its thermodynamical equilibrium on a fix photometric effect) — the primary planetary bodies were »first on stage» — before any local regional starlight, established on the Detailed K-cell detonation mathematical physics. All Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics.

•   With that picture — its thorough mathematical physics proof, and as here stated and claimed with no exception — the modern academy teaching system’s cosmological idea goes bye-bye. All the way. Not even dust remains of it. Say again.

Especially the Kant Nebular hypothesis with ”the planetesimals” theory. No way.

 

 

Claim whatever you want.

The doors are always open 24/7.

Disclaim this, on any available reasonable logics, and we will surrender immediately. Searched for. None yet found. Its is all mathematics: ExperimentalConfirmations.

 

 

STATE GOVERNMENTAL ADMINISTRATION does not stand above the individual. IT RECOGNIZES ITS EXISTENCE — unless openly practiced oppression:

ADDING TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED THIS ONE:

AND THERE IS NO WAY FOR ANY STATE ADMINISTRATION ON THIS PLANET EARTH TO IGNORE THIS VERY PROVABLE NATURE RESOURCE RESULT

•   OTHER THAN STARTING TO PRACTICE THE REVEALED never proclaimed but still openly practiced HUMAN RIGHT OPPRESSIONS MORE OPENLY, AS DEFINED (unproclaimed dictating nazistic fascistic satanism by DRIFT, not plan: the consequence of derogating, not observing HumanRightRecognition) —

•   OR BEGINNING TO ADAPT: decisions, claim, idea, statements outside HumanRightRecognition ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world” has only power to destroy: modern academy’s most cosmologically openly hated scientifically related declaration:

 

$ total biogas, S standing, c cyclic: NATURAL PROVISION up to 1812: Unfolded Leaf&Needle — at least 8 flat Earth globe area surfaces:

after only 200 years around year 2000: reduced to a rough 5 — and counting — as reckoned on the 30% removed forest area by human hand: a V8 on 5.

Leaf&Needle [The biologic Oxygen16Filter] — we welcome any related disclaiming argument. Search for, non yet found.

 

S/c proportion in $ ¦ AR123

 

 

•   Earth state administrations show no care, takes no responsibility,

•   apparently does not understand their own daily vandalization of life provisions;

•   apparently does not even understand the concept, blinded by ideas of deciding life authority

 

The MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 BIOLOGICALLY BioEK1-10 CONCURRING QUANTIFIED AR123 PROVABILITIES OF mJ=5.975T24KG as founded (BioGAS ¦ jH2O ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK) ON ITS crust isotopic compositions, ATTESTING A 100% BIOLOGICAL SOLIDITY ONLY on the explicit BioEK1¦1475 MLN1812 documented 100% Nature Preserved Forest Preference (TODAY 2020+ ONLY BY DEFORESTATION REDUCED TO 1254 — ADVERTISING A CORRESPONDING GLOBAL TOXIC ALARM EVEN SINCE 1962)    •   is apparently autonomously LOCKED into a position as to exclude any type, sort or nature of disclaimer. Apparently MEANING, Nature says, as so proved:

— THE BioEK1-10 COMPOSITIONAL NATURAL BIOLOGICAL HARMONY PROOF — never observed in modern academic quarters apparently due to its general contempt for Natural Intelligence Context — is, Nature herself apparently points out, impossible to undo, break up — or even question on any argumentative base, if correctly apprehended: gravitation. electricity: LIFE. HumanRightRecognition — ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”. Saying: Earth State Administrations — governments, parliaments — has to ADAPT — or more openly start practicing their present by DRIFT apparently so beloved decisive fascistic satanism: cookies: the foundation of NOT-freedom, NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the world: not one word HumanRight. Not a hint. Not a sound. Not a spell. Violence is gushing out From It. THAT IS: THE APPARENTLY Highly state administrative unproclaimed by DRIFT, not plan, beloved decisive fascistic satanism: cookies: 24/7 surveilled imprisonment, treating humanity as constantly surveilled tagged cattle, manipulated by governmentally ordained flashes of light and sound — forcing individuals to ”LOG IN” for sharing a human social intercourse named ”social media”. Not one word HumanRightRecognition. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint. Have your say. Disclaim this on any arguable reasonable ground, and we will surrender immediately. Absolutely — It is time to wake up. Because the provisions apparently cannot be more clear that so: UN: stop killing humanity.

 

STATE ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENTAL care IS NOT ABOUT DECISION. IT IS ABOUT recognition — UNLESS OPENLY PRACTICED OPPRESSION. Good example: Building Administrations have to recognize material properties on physical test methods, securing that the houses we live in does not crash when we sleep or walk in them: There is no imperial decision in that administration, only plain recognition based on knowledge. So the rest of the society also should work. Another good example: motoring enterprise: we study the kink, and repair the crank after available knowledge, tools and time. There is no voting, no majority decisions. Just plain simple knowledge foundations. But in governmental corridors, that simple principle has gone bazooka: the populations in there apparently does not even understand the Concept — apparently believing themselves to be Emperors of Intelligence: unproclaimed DRIFTING exercising fascistic highly beloved satanism — claimed as sanity: democracy: cookies. Not one word human right recognition. Not a sound.

 

THE ONLY COSMOLOGICAL INSTANCE KNOWING WHAT IS GOOD FOR another INDIVIDUAL is the one imagining standing above all the others:

— DRIFTING Unproclaimed dictating nazistic (A-people over B-people), fascistic (Emperor Informs Cattle) satanism (TheMentalKickOfIT).

 

 

Summing 1800+:

Modern academy (1800-1900+) rejected — discarded, repudiated — Nature (Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics) for the cheer of relativity theory — so that the academically educated personnel did not have to care about the logical relatable explainable details in physics — because relativity theory (The v+ic error, TheVIC) had invented Another Nature (compared to the real steel nature: PlanckEquivalents) nature discarding method of »multidimensional mathematical geometry» that did not care about the details in physics (EINSTEIN’S GENERAL RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE: EinsteinCitat14): It just concentrated on the possible mathematical solutions — AllKeplerMath — using whatever for a most close fit founded on an invented ”space curvature” — based on a limited cosmological mass (TheRevelation).

 

EinsteinCitat14:

”Skulle verkligen de fysikaliska lagarnas oberoende av koordinatsystemets rörelsetillstånd endast gälla för koordinatsystem med ömsesidig likformig translationsrörelse? Vad har naturen att skaffa med de av oss införda koordinatsystemen och deras rörelser? Om också naturbeskrivningen fordrar ett av oss godtyckligt infört koordinatsystem, så borde likväl valet av dess rörelsetillstånd ej vara underkastat någon inskränkning. Lagarna borde vara fullkomligt oberoende av detta val (den allmänna relativitetsprincipen).”.

MIN VÄRLDSBILD s175, Albert Einstein, BONNIERS 1934

translated:

SHOULD REALLY the physical laws’ independency of a coordinate system’s state of motion only hold for a coordinate system with mutually uniform translational motion? What has nature to deal with those of us introduced coordinate systems and their movements? If also the natural description demands one of us arbitrarily introduced coordinate system, so ought nevertheless the choice of its state of motion not be subordinated any curtailment. The laws ought to be completely independent from that choice (the general relativity principle).

 

— Yes, Albert. And so they also are in Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics already:

 

IT IS APPARENT (CollectREF) THAT EINSTEIN DEMANDED (OR INVENTED) AN IDEA THAT PHYSICS NEEDS AN OBJECTIVE — a Thing — REFERENCE SYSTEM IN OBSERVING OR DETERMINING OR ANALYZING PHYSICAL PHENOMENA. BECAUSE KEPLER-GALILEI-NEWTON MECHANICS HAS NOTHING OF THE KIND, WHATSOEVER: Einsteins (implied, or constructed) idea of INERTIA (related physics: resistance to change: state — Newton’s first).

 

Related physics:

•   There are no ”inertial systems” in physics — dear Albert. Never was. No way.

•   The laws of physics makes no difference between objects and the states they are at:

 

Gravitation is equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from: hence independent of time;

 

AND 1800+ MODERN ACADEMY IS OF COURSE MOST FAMOUS AND WELL KNOWN FOR HAVING GOT THE HANG OF THAT — BASIC PHYSICS. VERY HIGH IQ.. MUST BUY BOOK. IT IS SUCH A JOY.

 

— no difference between bodies and their motional states or other properties.

LIGHT is different to all matter, CAN be shielded from, and hence is time dependent.

 

Not represented in established corridors 1800+: The upstarted Kepler-Galilei-Newton Mechanics was never allowed to be perfected. Instead, it was discarded, treated as Primitive, for the modern academic cheer of »let’s get rid of God for once and for all» imagining emperorship over nature, as the history so apparently may be interpreted [ this author is not religious ]: relativity theory.Namely its very successful historical mathematical triumphal procession in front of an increasingly terrified humanity. There is nothing wrong with the mathematics. The kink is, that mathematics is not physics.

 

Related physics:

•   The Laws of Physics hold FOR systems. Never IN systems.

(Newton’s famous vessel experiment, that Einstein and others apparently never could understand the simple basic physics foundation of ¦ CollectREF).

•   Physics holds no STATE — only momentary equilibrium references (dv/dt) — instrumental readouts on balance properties: equilibrium — which we simplify and use as ”freezed idealized not changing momentarily states with zero internal changes” (»TimeZero»): PhysicsFIRST. »Hollywood Animations».

•   Newton was clear on that (no absolute rest: no »inertial system»), specifically. Especially in his stated

 

”For it may be that there is no body really at rest, to which the places and motions of others may be referred.”,

Isaac Newton PRINCIPIA 1687 —  SCHOLIUM IV Absolute motion

No mother god loving way Newton makes credit to any idea of an »inertial system».

There are no such Newton quotes or context. Searched for. None yet found.

•   But many writers 1800+ seem to have a deep yearn of laying such intentions in the mouth of Newton:

— ”According to Newton ..” and ”Newton’s opinion ..”. Text books. Fact books. Encyclopedias. You name it.

See Newton In Explicit  on his vessel experiment:

”There is only one real circular motion of any one revolving body”. Clear. Sharp. Exact. But the modern 1800+ academy populations seems to have understood nothing of its content: read: no absolute space reference exists:

•   no inertial system. It is apparently a modern academic misapprehended invention, blocking basic true understanding.

 

Kepler-Galilei-Newton basic mechanics is completely free from the modern academic apparently invented — apparently by misconception and misunderstanding — ”inertial systems”. Nothing of the kind (STATE) exists in related physics. No way. Not even on my best day. See further (Swedish edition: modern academic ideas analyzed) in INERTIA.

 

Einstein (and his academic followers) apparently never understood physics. To be corrected if faulty.

This is by far the worst — tragedy — compiled texts in UniverseHistory.

 

TheREVELATION

 

TICOC: 23Feb2023 — THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION ¦ TheREVELATION ¦ TheMACrevelation ¦ Europe1800plus ¦ TheComposition

 

 

The populations never receive education — information, teaching: enlightenment — of what exactly HumanRight entails — because the European Authorities Europe1800plus have shut down all such paths by reformulating the original to a more suitable costume — so that The European Authorities can continue in practicing The Authority’s Authority — by continuing the 1800+ handling of the population as

Tagged Expendable Cattle. MasterInformsCattle.

 

Regaining Civilization

THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION

 

THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION

— What do you mean ”indisputable”, how can you say that, with what right?

—  Educate us. Have your say: With what right is there a questioning in there? Please relate, explain, show.

 

It is naturally granted a permit to introduce

AN INTERRUPT AT ANY TIME

 

A PERMIT TO INTRODUCE AN INTERRUPT AT ANY TIME

 

•   where life is in a situation of danger or hazard

(police, ambulance, rescue organized activity)

•   where HumanRight recognition is NOT observed, (UDHR10Dec1948)

 

THE FOUNDATION OF FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND PEACE

 

".. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world .."

in specific concordance with (UDHR10Dec1948)

".. every individual and every organ in society, constantly keeping this Declaration in mind, shall strive by teaching and education .. ",

 

on the so explicit apparent corner stone of civilized perseverance that (UDHR10Dec1948)

"Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible". And that IT is especially directed onto personnel apparently in explicit on the level of The Personnel involved in police, prosecutor, court, justice system in general: educational and public social services, as stated (UDHR10Dec1948):

 

 

— So tell us, educate us, European Union: Just give us a single example inside Your Community, whatever, one singe occasion of a free and full development residence. Just 1.

”   Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ”;

— You can’t. At present, there is no such preferences in Europe — or elsewhere, what we know. However, if there is any argument against: please share. That would be good news.

 

------------------------------------

ILLUSTRATED 2018, and counting — MidSweden photos. EUROPE: a villain on full pedal — a humanity killer ON DRIFT, not plan — its cheer for PARLIAMENTARY MAJORITY DECISIONS with zero ZERO humanRight recognition — exercising fascism, dictatorship, satanism — by DRIFT. Not plan: Cosmologically Assembled Stupidity pacing its way through the Galaxy in a universe. Say: decision outside HumanRight recognition has only power to destroy.

IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THE MAJORITY CONCERNS 1 PERSON OR ONE BILLION PERSONS:

decision outside HumanRight recognition has only power to destroy. Unproclaimed dictating nazistic fascisisc exercising satanism. On DRIFT.

Say again.

 

 

 

SWEDEN is enhancing its global cheer for — and interest in — Universal Animal Rights. And counting.

 

»free and full development»?

What is known about it INSIDE European Union TO EXEMPLIFY ? We need only see one single example:

— stop killing humanity.

------------------------------------

 

MEANING — related cognition and apprehension:

 

ANY OTHER CLAIM OR STATEMENT WILL BE THE PER DEFINITION OF

not-freedom, not-justice and not-peace in the world:

— exercising oppression. So by force proclaimed or unproclaimed, by drift, or intention.

 

THE FOREMOST DRIVING MOTIVATION INSIDE CIVILIZATION HENCE (UDHR10Dec1948)

 

”by teaching and education”

 

” by teaching and education ”:

 

 

Disclaim this:

Present European Union Science and Technology is practicing a Doll’s House Theater — with only result to destroy the surface of the planet, still further [1800+]. Every inch of it.

— Show humanity this author is lying. Show the arguments. We will surrender immediately. Absolutely. The present order of state administrative ideas is facing its own mad end:

irresponsible, uneducated, careless. Not one word HumanRight.

 

 

•   gravitation and electricity (heat, light, magnetism);

— insight into these lay the foundation of any technologically developed culture,

including developed individual skills to handle matter, materials, navigating their domains, knowing their limitations and possibilities, in mathematics and physics (chemistry included)

•   THE PERIODIC SYSTEM OF THE ELEMENTS[‡]

what we and matter in general are made of, how it is assembled and maintained,

the grammar of the languages, and their morphological structures. All

 

on the premises (UDHR10Dec1948) of

•   ".. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..", where (UDHR10Dec1948)

•   " Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.", and

•   " No one may be compelled to belong to an association."

 

NO ONE SINGLE HUMAN BEING MUST BE FORCED TO ANY ACT THAT IS VIOLATING THE INDIVIDUAL'S OWN human right founded CONVICTION. No way. By no means, European Court Union Administration. Claim whatever you want, in whatever manner you want.

 

SHORTER:

A CIVILIZED SOCIETY HAS NO RIGHT — no moral right, no jurisdictional right, no educational right: no right at all — TO FORCE OBEDIENCE OR TO SENTENCE FOR DISOBEDIENCE ONTO A HUMAN INDIVIDUAL.

No way. Under no circumstances. Under no conditions,

 

explicitly again (UDHR10Dec1948)

 

•   "   Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and "

•   " of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family"

•   " is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world".

 

European Union and its provable educationally human right oppressing Court in explicit:

stop killing the population out of its natural entitled human right recognition by suggesting that DECISIONS — parliamentarism — rule law and order; Decisions rule destruction. HumanRights ARE the law. Claim whatever you want, at any time. There is no VOTING on repairing a crank Motor. There is just knowledge, tools, and time to do the work. Stop fooling around, imagining to represent Authority. You don’t.

 

RECOGNITION — NOT DECISION: EUROPEAN COURT DID NOT CREATE THE BRAIN, BUT IT APPEARS IT  WANTS TO CLAIM SUCH AUTHORITY:

— Prussia — the basic Nazi Head — was forbidden after WW2. But Europe kept what the Nazi Head introduced (around 1870), the most humiliating Nazi-fascistic ideogram ever seen under the stars: obligatory military service. A direct unproclaimed fascistic-satanistic invention, transferring all civilized human intercourse into a playtable with MasterInformsExpendableCattle what to do: human life sacrificing satanist inspired stupid, uneducated Europe and its jurisdictional authorities forced violence into its populations, under threat of punishment. And so it still is today — named democracy by a growingly terrified population, forced to meet its social consequences of everyday growing violence. European Fascistic-satanism on Drift. It was never so intended. But the suckers upholding its practice are blinded enough by their ideas of power and authority to continue the unproclaimed drifting satanistic crusade against the populations. Not one word human right.

 

 

FOUNDATION IT IS — not state administrative decision:

 

•   All other activity and engagement will effectively KILL humanity and its possible civilization into a spiral of deciding A-people over sacrificial B-people, on Decisions made by The A Team, to be obeyed by The B Team, terrified to oppose The Authorities.

 

SO THAT ANY COSMOLOGICALLY ASSEMBLED ALIKE European Convention Exemplified Historical FUCKUP WILL HAVE ITS SPLENDID OPPORTUNITY TO ENLIGHTEN HUMANITY ON THE MEANING OF LAW AND ORDER: Terror. Violence. Death of society:

— Point plate handcuffed muzzled population 24/7 surveilled and controlled by flashing light signals and sound, treated like tagged cattle. MasterInformsCattle.

 

NATURAL DEFENCE SAVES HUMANITY

 

•   DEFENSE is a natural property inside every molecular extension in Life — even in dead matter (mechanical strength properties: destructive resistance):

•   It is — hence — nothing the we humans can CREATE.

•   It is something we humans must ORGANIZE

on equal standards by — again —

THE FOREMOST DRIVING MOTIVATION INSIDE CIVILIZATION HENCE (UDHR10Dec1948)

 

” by teaching and education ”:

 

•   "   Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and "

•   " of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family"

•   " is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world".

 

NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BY ANY MEANS OF FORCE, OR HAZARD OF A RISK FOR BEING

 

•   ATTACKED BY TYPE European Convention Human Right Violating SOCIETY

police, prosecutor, court, imprisonment — public populations

BECAUSE CONVICTED OF THE EXISTENCE OF A

(UDHR10Dec1948)

•   " foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ":

•   "  recognition of the inherent dignity "

•    " of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family ".

 

IF IT EXISTS,

TYPE European Convention Human Right Violating SOCIETY,

IT WILL BE THE PER DEFINITION OF

 

not-freedom, not-justice and not-peace in the world:

•   exercising oppression, so by force proclaimed or unproclaimed, by drift, or intended.

 

RECOGNITION — NOT DECISION: EUROPEAN COURT DID NOT CREATE THE BRAIN, BUT IT APPEARS IT  WANTS TO CLAIM SUCH AUTHORITY:

 

Gushing constantly developing increasing violence over its populations — by DRIFT. Not plan. Just for the cheer of a personal idea of representing a Power of Authority: obedience.

 

Claim whatever you want, United Nations:

— Your present way allows violence to GUSH out FROM your corridors, state administrations, governments, jurisdictional offices, pouring its content over a growingly terrified humanity, standing completely powerless in front of is gushing raging wrath.

 

THAT HIGHLY BELOVED UNITED NATIONS CHEER FOR AUTHORITY STATE OF THE ARTS forces humanity, its individuals into a pool of impossible social-mental intercourse conflicts

WHICH UN TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR

— raising despair and a fundamental state of powerlessness in the individual human being’s associative daily life —

that none of us humans can handle when and if we become its victim:

— like a wild animal caught in a cage, striving with all its might to get free: it will KILL everything in its way.

 

AND THE UN, ITS STATE ADMINISTRATIONS, ANSWERS WITH "putting down the foot" ACTIONS STILL INCREASING THE UN AUTHORITATIVE IDEA OF LAW AND ORDER — TO GET THE CATTLE TO BEHAVE AS EXPECTED:

 

Gushing extended exercised unproclaimed fascistic satanism. By drift, not plan.

 

WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATIONS ARE APPARENTLY KILLING HUMANITY FOR THE SAKE OF EXERCISING ITS OWN SELF PROCLAIMED AUTHORITATIVE ELITE’S IDEA OF LAW AND ORDER. Fascism. Not one word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.

cookies. MasterInformsCattle. 24/7 surveilled.

 

So: DEFENSE NOT FOUNDED ON EACH INDIVIDUAL’S OWN FREE WILL

(UDHR10Dec1948)

•   ".. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world .." with (UDHR10Dec1948)

•   " Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.",

•   " No one may be compelled to belong to an association."

ONLY and IRREVOCABLY CREATES A SPIRAL OF INCREASING VIOLENCE.

Show, relate, exemplify any possible Disclaim:

— UN: stop killing humanity.

 

DEFENSE like all other NATURAL PROPERTIES should be presented

— in detail, every part and domain of it (from Grade1) —

 

on equal standards by

 

THE FOREMOST DRIVING MOTIVATION INSIDE CIVILIZATION HENCE (UDHR10Dec1948)

 

” by teaching and education ”.

 

Not to Kill, but to Save. How, Why, The Techniques. The Life Quest.

All of that which is not present in today’s society.

 

All human beings, as well as animals, have the idea of a defense naturally inborn. The only exercise for UN — regional nations: EUROPE — is to promote the individual to

DEVELOP ITS INNATE POWER TO EXPERIENCE THE SATISFACTION OF ITS INSIGHT

 

on the explicit corner stone of civilized perseverance (UDHR10Dec1948), that

 

” Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible”.  European Court: Give an example.

— You can’t. There is no present competence for that.

 

Free. Full.

— Documented detailed provable European Convention-Human-Right-Violating SOCIETY:

— Give examples. Please.

— That would be our most happy moment:

Free. Full.

— Do disclaim anyone who can (23Feb2023):

NOT ONE THE F WORD CORNER IN EUROPE HAS IT. No way:

cookies. Not one word HumanRight. Not a spell. Not a hint. No way. Exercising oppression.

 

Motivation. Interest in Human Civilization.

— No attacks on peaceful beings. No way.

— European Convention-Human-Right-Violating SOCIETY.

».. must not be interpreted as ..». MasterInformsCattle.

 

At present, our world situation (Feb2023),

the UN administrations — especially The European Union and its self proclaimed eminent human rights violations on the subject (Breaching directly the Article 30: ”The European Convention” inventing its populations as obedient Cattle) — are completely impotent in realizing the actual practice.

Fascism. Gushing violence. A-people over B-cattle. Say again:

 

 

PARLIAMENTARY DECISIONS AND CONSENSUS

HAVE NO MANDATE OVER HUMAN RIGHT.

Never had. Has not now. Never will have.

 

Consensus is no scientific subject. Never was. Never will be: dictatorship if claimed.

 

 

 

Authorities of society continues to remove the existence we once came from‡, cutting deep bleeding wounds in the nature that once existed, but no longer is so allowed, by the Authorities of society: jurisdictional private ownership excludes HumanRight recognition.

Mississippi 1830. Private Property.

 

— The pain and hurt living beings feel on that credit, is subject to great contempt from

the Authorities of Society: Not one word HumanRight. Not a hint. No support.

— UN: stop killing humanity. Because that is exactly what is going on:

 

•   Business Enterprise in itself TAKES NOT KNOWLEDGE ARGUMENTATION.

— Why?

•   Because it can’t. Knowledge is an abstract to business enterprise: quality only.

•   Slavery trade. Dolan’s Cadillac [ 2009, Christian Slater ]. Trafficking.

•   HumanRight is a knowledge domain: gravitation. electricity: LIFE.

•   Business Enterprise, its entrepreneurs, does not understand that concept.

•   State administration should protect humanity from such. Instead it is the payed bitch.

 

 

DECISION OUTSIDE HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNITION

HAS ONLY POWER TO DESTROY. Say again.

 

That so because, as stated

 

(UDHR10Dec1948)

•   "   Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and "

•   " of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family"

•   " is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ",

 

ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND MEANINGS AND STATEMENTS BECOME THE PER DEFINITION OF EXERCISING OPPRESSION,

the foundation of NOT freedom, NOT justice and NOT peace in the world.

 

Claim whatever you want UN, in whatever manner you want:

— Stop killing humanity. Stop practicing unproclaimed fascistic satanism.

 

Wake up.

The World needs cooperation — on already existing recognized foundations:

Defense.

 

” by teaching and education ” (UDHR10Dec1948).

THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION

 

 

TICOC — THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION — TheREVELATION

 

TheMACrevelation: — The modern academic revelation —  TheREVELATION ¦ TICOC — THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION ¦ TheComposition ¦ Europe1800+ ¦ TICOC — ¦ TICOC —

 

 

THE MODERN ACADEMIC INVENTION OF A CLAIMED DISCOVERED NEW KIND OF MIND APPREHENSION

 It is such a joy to share the most eminent of thoughts with the most prominent of authors in the history of human civilizations. Absolutely.

 

TheMACrevelation 1 ¦12:

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] AllKeplerMath ¦ TheROUTE ¦ The REVELATION ¦ CHART1 ¦ CHART3 ¦ Number5 ¦ ‡ ¦ THEcr

TheMACrevelation 2¦34: 1

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] CHART3 ¦ AllKeplerMath ¦ TheEnergySource ¦ CHART1 ¦ TheROUTE ¦ Number5

TheMACrevelation 3 ¦56: 2

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] Experimental Confirmations ¦ HumanRight ¦ njut av ett vackert kalhygge

 

THE GENERAL BELIEF IS THAT THERE IS NO HARM IN WHAT IS DONE. »WE ARE THE LAW».

The level of educational associative thinking in Business Enterprise corridors: »We made the brains too». MustBuyBook. VeryHighIQ.

 

 

•   Business Enterprise in itself cannot handle culture, civilization, technology: knowledge.

•   Not one word HumanRight. Not a spell. Not a sound. Not a hint.

 

 

TheMACrevelation ¦  3 2 1

 

Europe1800+:

TheMACrevelation

THE EUROPEAN UNION MODERN ACADEMIC COUNTERPART — BEGINNING FROM The 1800s

 2023: Jurisdictional Slavery: Dictating obedience under Authority Commands for executing Authority Preserving services, under threats of punishment.

Not one word HumanRight. Not a hint. Not a spell. Not a sound. The personnel does not even understand the concept.

Trafficking. Mississippi 1830. Killing life sustaining physics that built the human brain during some undisturbed zero bald cut 3Gy biological evolution.

— By Drift. Not plan. No such proclamations were formulated, and no such aim was indented, as we know.

EUROPE 1 ¦12:

SWEDISH STATE ADMINISTRATION JURISDICTIONAL LAWFUL OWNERSHIP is continuing its cheer for enhanced respect for universal animal rights.

 

 

The European Union (except England until 1916) AROUSE ON the 1800s war hungry European region's nazistic authoritative initiative of proclaiming the population as an EXPENDABLE B class individuals: »You are now under the authority of an A class individuals with right to force obedience under threats of punishment» — for the general sake of securing a fundamental new time Ear with a Core of a National Socialism: »It shall be founded on solidarity and loyalty with the new deciding A class population»: Nazism. As it still is. Authoritative Disobedience is Punished. Basic exercising Nazi-fascism. CORRESPONDINGLY by the same order of matters‡ as in the new 1800+ modern academic case, the  European Union grew up — apparently by DRIFT, not plan, not aware at all what it was or still is involved in — in still living in its classic imperialistic idea of representing an A class of individuals governing a lower (MasterInformsCattle) B class of individuals: »The lower population must Obey The A class individuals with its present Authoritative costume and order of matters»: — Never questioned: not one word human right. That is how the now and so proclaimed European Union with its jurisdictional European Convention did appear (soon after UDHR10Dec1948), as we know our late modern European history.

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] the same reason ¦ TheMACrevelation ¦ UDHR10Dec1948 ¦ Article 30

EUROPE 2 ¦34: 1

Europe 1800+ — THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION: continue business as usual.

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] UDHR10Dec1948 ¦ of the greatest importance

EUROPE 3 ¦56: 2

Europe 1800+ — European Jurisdictional Court: Why are you mistreating the excellent perfect UDHR10Dec1948 Declaration?

 

 

— Because it does not give us the power of authority we need.

— How is it that you cannot comply on its simple — perfect — content as ”the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world”?

— Because we do not have that type of inducement.

— Does it look to you that your idea of authority has conquered the universe, making it work on your will, on your decisions?

— Yes.

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] UDHR10Dec1948  

EUROPE 4 ¦78: 3

The Natural Farming Landscape ..

 

 

A paradise — in a universe. Photo: SWEDEN 16May2022 Excursion2 Picture—10.

 

— 7 —

EUROPE 1800+

 

Same reason:

 

For the sake of performing business outside of human right recognition

 

(the only existing knowledge domain there is; gravitation, electricity: LIFE)

— by drift, not plan,

as if the only intended cosmological plan was: Business, outside human right recognition, by drift, not plan:

— »We Are The Law»:

 

because inside of it, »we are not experiencing enough free will to do what we want»:

 

raping, looting, sacking, forcing, intruding, dictating, and so on .. selling .. buying .. more quality .. Dolan’s Cadillac .. slavery, trafficking ..

 

JURISDICTIONALLY GOVERNED BUSINESS AUTHORITY — lawful private ownership — on drift, not plan — securing a corresponding protected dictating authority (CHINA):

 

Not one word HumanRight.

 

Because IF business — outside human right recognition — was NOT involved (»perfectly respected market and trade») we would live in a practical global human right recognized cultural paradise: we already have had all the necessary provisions from day one. The only missing part is: insight, knowledge how to realize IT. And the world states cannot realize it — because it does NOT work on Violence or Authority Decision.

 

Same reason:

 

heavy ego inducement (power greed). Heavy underestimation of Nature.

 

— EUROPE 1800+ —

7

— 8 —

EUROPE 1800+

 

 

— EUROPE 1800+ —

8

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡]

 Europe1800+ ¦ 4 3 2 1

 

DEFENSE:  —  Europe1800+

 

THE HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNIZED CIVILIZED HUMAN NATURAL DEFENSE

 

DEFENSE 1 ¦12:

— Gravitation, electricity: LIFE. Leaf&Needle, the Sun Energy collecting Agency that Brought Humans to Earth. Woman. Queen of a Universe — Wisdom says.

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡]

DEFENSE 2 ¦34: 1

WHERE the less touch of a human hand is visible, the more Life Power nature gives to the individual. Say again: beauty. Woman. Intelligence. Peace of mind.

 

DEFENSE ¦ Europe1800+

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible

The Swedish example ¦

DEFENSE 3 ¦56: 2

DEFENSE ¦ Europe1800+

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] UDHR10Dec1948 ¦ HumanRight

DEFENSE 4 ¦78: 3

Business Enterprise Kills Nature

 

DEFENSE ¦ Europe1800+

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡]

DEFENSE 5 ¦910: 4

 

SWEDEN is improving its global care for more universal animal rights: Preparing new land for more animal hotels. New Wall TVs.

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ¦ UDHR10Dec1948

DEFENSE 6 ¦1112: 5

Europe: have you a problem with tranquillity — ease of mind — prosperous association — fruitful inspiration? Do tell.

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] HumanRight ¦ the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ¦ Article 30

DEFENSE 7 ¦1314: 6

DEFENSE ¦ Europe1800+ — new technology will be born .. because the present one is not enough ..

 

 

GAMMA PROJECT DETAILS IN UniverseHistory — 2012+ — it better be fruitful ..

 

Tool shops for Craftsmanship. Handicraft, Workmanship, Individual Scientific Development .. After 2000: gone with the wind. Why? What’sUp? Why is Business Enterprise Killing — dumping, selling out, murdering — Humanity, Science, Technology, Nature? Please do explain. Not one word HumanRight.

WHERE IS THIS CIVILIZED LAW: No business enterprise is allowed to to have or perform any activity or engagement outside an explicit UDHR10Dec1948 recognized human right recognition. Say again.

” No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.”. Say again. World Jurisdictional Administrations.

•   Business Enterprise in itself does not understand the concept of HumanRightRecognition: knowledge. Gravitation, electricity: LIFE. Sell buy is Not connected.

•   Zero cultural educational technological human right Civilized responsibility. A Creepy Prick. In Its Self.

•   We hate Communism [ Russia .. China .. Dictatorship .. low educated, ignorant pedestrians .. ]. But we have to give it The credit that Capitalism CONTAINS an Ultra Creepy Fuck Family Killer.

•   Resulting Message:  the future belongs to an open and free market and trade — under the HumanRights recognition DEFENSE. Other war parties will NOT win, History already says and Teaches;

— CHINA and Russia, with Associates: Do you surrender freely?

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] Article 12

 

WHERE IS THE GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY?

— In a parliament, a congress caring for human rights protection, no proposition raises above the trash can if the proposition cannot secure a RELATED connection to an explicit human right recognition UDHR10Dec1948 — as is. Every suggestion, every proposition. Any idea.

•   A congress caring for human rights protection, does not VOTE on human rights issues:

•   A congress caring for human rights protection, OBSERVES AND RESPECTS human rights issues — or not at all.

•   Decision outside human right recognition has only power to destroy:

 

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

UDHR10Dec1948

 

ALL OTHER INDUCEMENTS BECOME A PER DEFINITION OF EXERCISING OPPRESSION:

 

foundation of NOT-freedom, NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the world

 

Gravitation, electricity (light, heat, magnetism): LIFE.

Those are the conditions we live under, not over.

 

 

LINKColumnOrganization:

—————————————[‡] 3Feb2023

Different web readers present different Column Vandalization Techniques : no world company cooperation — even on the simplest of all civilized ABC duties. — Perhaps the actual problem is that the programming personnel has a too low apprehending profit. (World needs more Oxygen). Up to present: Can only handle simple figures 1 .. 2 .. ¦ The Odd (first) column preserves the original, but the second (right) column is elongated.

— The original layout in WORD2000 — perfect alignment — is destroyed differently on different parallel text column heights — inside the same table height (two columns) — by different web readers. That was not what the author had in mind. Solution:

— After spell check, the text has been PNG-imagized, adding the actual original text links at the bottom of each column pair OddEven page. Thank you for reading.

 

 

DEFENSE ¦ 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

 

MaTool:

 

HOW BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 2000+ KILLED HUMANITY’S 1900 DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGICAL CULTURE OF INDIVIDUAL HANDICRAFT

MATERIALS AND TOOLS

for the human individual to develop skills through, knowledge about natural processes and their benefit on a culture of market, trade and technology

 

 

THE 2000+ GREAT BUSINESS ENTERPRISE DRAINAGE OF THE 1900s REACHED HIGH LEVEL OF

MECHANICAL TOOL SHOP MARKET

for jumping on a the 2000+ more computer oriented,

more profitable train resulting in today’s (Feb2023) situation:

 

•   closed shops for A PREVIOUSLY RICH MANIFOLD OF materials and tools:

•   closed down industrial production of SUCH AVAILABLE high quality tools:

•   a shut down market of BEFORE VERY useful handicraft materials and tools:

•   a most profound shut down of market and trade on these before (1900s) prosperous details;

•   all apparently because

 

STATE ADMINISTRATIONS GENERAL IDEA OF CULTURE takes no responsibility in THAT:

business enterprise cannot keep up with technology, but aspires to govern it, control it, own it:

 

Not one word HumanRight.

— The personnel does not even understand the concept.

 

 

DURING PRACTICALLY THE WHOLE 1900s — 100 years of trade, market and growing refinement of instrumentation mechanics — the individual human was offered many opportunities to develop on personal skills with help of these in some cases very fine instrumentation and tools technology. Now (Feb2023) its previous market is practically stone dead.

 

 

Business enterprise demands a special battery driven hand held handcuffed point plate

demanding a »join the World Wide cookies movement — not one word HumanRight recognition mentioning»

if the person wants to see what the Corresponding Paper Less Internet Shop contains.

— Otherwise: no access.

— World Wide Business Enterprise Internet Organizations: stop killing humanity.

Business enterprise demands on an international TRADE process that (type, Swedish example — hundreds of upset complaints, but national state and world jurisdiction gives no help — UPS-like package delivering companies) the buyer must not be engaged or involved in HumanRight recognition details

— because the UPS personnel, as documented, partly has poor local language education (recommendation to contact UPS-personnel in ½-PolandEnglish), and partly a documented completely zero understanding of general HumanRight details: THE COMPANY GENERATES CONFLICTS AS the buyer is not allowed to use his national post office service (to get his US pack home to Sweden), because the standard UPS instance hijacks the package, removes it away from the buyer unless UPS cooperative: must answer phone when UPS instance calls, no previous notification — the UPS personnel has, documented, poor or none social HumanRights Training communication experience: does not understand the concept.

   In a special documented case, a UPS instance personnel demanded extra payment — for an already signed and payed delivery merchandise, under threat of jurisdictional prosecution. On several contacts with the personnel, trying to reset the situation to normal, the UPS personnel (ending up on some 15 different UPS individuals, spread out over different global locations) very well yes excused itself for having committed a faulty process, but informed that the error could not be repaired (the part where the UPS personnel demanded extra payment under threat of jurisdictional prosecution if it was not payed within the specified time, after the merchandise was delivered, signed and payed).

   Some of the documented victims has expressed it so ”They should be equipped with a robbers hood”.

   No world jurisdictional help. No more open ordered INDIVIDUAL market and trade.

   The Death of Civilization.

   Internet Business Enterprise as reigned in itself apparently and provably kills humanity.

— World State Governments:

 

•   stop killing humanity

•   stop killing international trade

•   stop killing international market

•   stop practicing slavery and trafficking on humanity as if tagged personal property cattle

 

 

— Take the Swedish company Clas Ohlson as an example (Once:The Swedish Great Handicraft Post Order Shop):

— Founded 1918 it fed the whole nation wide population with handicraft tools on a comparable high level of selective merchandise — of which NOTHING exists today (2023):

 

gold smith tools, 0.15 mM high quality metal saw blades, copper, brass and steel bars and pipes in selected dimensions, ball bearing details, cog-wheels an cog-bars, miniature hobby metal lathes with many different accessories, pillar drill strands and tripods, drilling machines on a miniature scale, normal and bigger, all the tools and material any individual human would wish for AN ACCESS IN making CONSTRUCTIONS on a small hobby scale — electronics, mechanics, you name it: grinding, drilling, lathing.

   Paradise — almost. What was not »perfect» could be fixed.

 

   After 2000 the company AND ITS WORLD ASSOCIATED BUSINESS FRIENDS started this:

•   GET RID OF IT — all of it.

   By 2010, practically all of it: gone. Just exterminated out from the market.

   The individual possibility that once existed: gone. No ACCESSING QUALITY tools anymore — on that level of availability that had been on the Clas Ohlson marked trade during its 1900s history.

    Aftermath: It becomes extensively and painfully harder to find any shop at all — if at all — that has any alike quality details to offer. The cultural — global — situation paints up something resembling A TECHNOLOGICAL RECESSION: turning the clock backwards, ending up today (2023): practically nothing available at all.

•   All services suspended (John Wick — took his Mustang, and killed his dog: not good. Story to be continued).

 

•   Business Enterprise killed Technology Evolution.

— If anyone can: disclaim. Show some example.

   We will surrender immediately.

 

THE BOTTOM LINE:

 

—  The World Business Enterprise

•   has all possible means of preserving a reached marker of scientific welfare with high quality processes for mankind — each fucking human being — to enjoy and develop from.

 

But as we know:

 

•    business enterprise in itself takes no knowledge arguments.

”You drive with that fucking human right” (Swedish Court Standard, as documented).

•    business enterprise in itself understands not HumanRight: knowledge, technology.

— Not one word HumanRight Recognition. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.

(Swedish Court as documented: ”That is not our responsibility”).

•    business enterprise in itself APPARENTLY understands not CIVILIZATION.

(read: Swedish Court, prosecutor, police, public state administrations in general: not one word).

 

— Because KNOWLEDGE in itself is — i s : spellt i with a following s as so related and exemplified — an abstract to business enterprise in itself

— business enterprise in itself CANNOT KEEP UP WITH technology:

   But it not only very much wants to, but apparently also has developed an idea that it Leads Its Development:

•   no access unless cookies consent. Not one word HumanRight.

 

Give them Caps with text: »less developed»:

 

•   business enterprise APPARENTLY does NOT understand the value of knowledge, technological innovation: contributional individuality: intelligence. Say again. Give examples. Show us — in itself.

   And so IT — intelligence 1900; reached marker of high technological status — was dumped on the great scene of human history state administrations and their cheer for building the world societies on ideas outside human right recognition — for The Wealthy Happy Liberated Business Enterprise Joy to jump on to a more profitable Vehicle and suck its content out til emptied, for next victim ..

— the (2000+) exploding interest for Computer Accessories, dumping further availability OF the unique culturally human developed reached high status marker of mechanics during the 1900s — the individual human’s best friend.

   Business Enterprise in itself gave a shit on that one.

 

Give them Caps with text: »less developed».

Selling Gold for Ashes — Warning Text — Add blinking LEDs — RedBlue.

 

Many stupid things (we) humans have done. But that one will easily — with any branch in a historical contest — and unthreatened take the the winner price to be of the most imbecile and low level stupid that has ever seen a shoe under the stars: state administration responsibility for Defense. Exterminated. Shredded.

 

•   business enterprise in itself apparently is and can be understood, exemplified and related as

•   one Full 100% Oblivion Let’sKill Technology and Humanity, in its constant search for more profit.

Not one word human right recognition. Not one word.

Slavery and trade is all it cares about — when reigned on its own throne.

 

Do disclaim it all — if found any rational reason.

We will surrender immediately.

 

 

MaTool

 

TheComposition:

THE (Nov2021) DISCOVERED COMPOSITION

TheMACrevelation

TheComposition 1 ¦12:

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] CWON ¦ CAP ¦ BeEN ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ BioEquivalent1 ¦ Bio6 ¦ 1254 ¦ Plant Oxygen Filter

Loss of Forest Area

TheComposition 2 ¦34:

 

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

[‡] CWON ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ water came from the outer ¦ Photosynthesis ¦ TheComplete ¦ MLP ¦

MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ same mathematical rank ¦ TheREVELATION ¦ AllKeplerMath ¦ CHART1 ¦

planetary perihelion precession phenomena ¦

 

 

See also (further) in EarthMASS.