DELPHI4Test2014
TextPΕbild ¦ Jan2022 UNIVERSUMS
HISTORIA | 2011V4 ¦ 2022I18 | aproduction
| Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-03-22 YMD ¦ HumanRight
is a knowledge domain
content innehεll · webbSΦK δMNESORD pε
denna sida Ctrl+F · sφk δmnesord φverallt
i indexSAKREGISTER · fφrteckning φver alla webbsidor
PAINTBRUSH document APPENDIX ¦ APPENDIX EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS Our Universe
with THE REVELATION
Vidareutvecklat Frεn
DELPHI 4 Test 2011 |
T2014TextPΕbild HUVUDDELEN AV VERKTYGEN MAN BEHΦVER
FΦR AVANCERAD DATORANVΔNDNING I TEXT OCH BILD
DISPOSITION | Teckenfφrklaringar: MusKLICKVδnster |
Hφger:
|
RullaMushjulet FRΕN |
MOT:
|
TextONpicture How DELPHI4 made it
TextONpicture compiled EXAMPLE
Feb2022 SWEDEN ON PURPOSEFULNESS
only in two decades an unbelievable violent destruction of an original heavenly
stunning Nature. Where is Justice On Earth?
MACHINES travel many thousands of kilometer road just to cut
vegetation down as on a Galactic Command some 2010+ from »The Authorities»:
no warning. It just shockingly arrived. Full pace. Where is Justice On Earth? No
answer.
SOMEONE MISSED THE ON
RAMP TO NATURAL ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
MARKET, TRADE .. CIVILIZATION. This is not it. No mother god loving
way. Machine vandalizes nature: say something intelligent. Please.
Leaf&Needle
BUILT life from sunlight. 3Gy to
Woman. So: Where is the replacement? Women with three legs new PharmA Invention
Compensates? MustBuyBook. Killed animals on the roads in growing amounts.
The technique is detailed
in TextIn.
The DELPHI4 code in
DELPHI4Test2022 from 27Sep201 Unit1T Delphi P2
central executing part.
All comments removed just the raw code:
The TextIn procedure is called when the
SPACE key is pressed (Toggles TextIn OnOff):
The text becomes integrated
with the background, and is handled as a General FLEET
(Ctrl+Arrows moving
object) freely mobile over the background picture for exact positioning:
Ctrl+NumPad 123 (5 9)
sets pixel step interval 1 5 20 (½page whole).
Procedure
TextIn;
var
A,B,C: TBitMap;
Pa,Pb,Pc: PByteArray;
R,S: TRect;
g,p: Real;
W,H,x,y: Integer;
aR,aG,aB: Byte;
GrayC,GrayS,I,J: Byte;
White: Bool;
begin
with Form1 do
begin {Procedure TextIn;}
if (SkipWhite=1)
then exit;
cTextIn:= wTF.Color;
if wTF.Color=clWhite
then White:=True else White:=False;
if White
and FleetOverideWT then exit;
I:=0; J:=0; GrayC:=0;
if White then
begin
aR:= 255;
aG:= 255;
aB:= 255;
end else
begin
aR:= GetRValue(cTextIn);
aG:= GetGValue(cTextIn);
aB:= GetBValue(cTextIn);
GrayC:= (aR+aG+aB)div 3;
end;
R:= Image2.ClientRect;
S:= R;
OffsetRect(S,X0,Y0);
W:= R.Right - 1;
H:= R.Bottom - 1;
A:= TBitMap.Create;
B:= TBitMap.Create;
C:= TBitMap.Create;
try
BitMapRect(R,A);
A.PixelFormat:= pf32bit;
if White
then A.Assign(vBWT) else
A.Assign(Image2.Picture);
BitMapRect(R,B);
B.PixelFormat:= pf32bit;
B.Assign(Image3.Picture);
BitMapRect(R,C);
C.PixelFormat:= pf32bit;
C.Canvas.CopyRect(R,Image1.Canvas,S);
C.Transparent:= True;
if White then C.TransparentColor:=
clBlack else
C.TransparentColor:= clWhite;
for y:= 0 to H do
begin
if White
then Pa:= vBWT.ScanLine[y] else
Pa:= A.ScanLine[y];
Pb:= B.ScanLine[y];
Pc:= C.ScanLine[y];
for x:= 0
to W do
begin
GrayS:= (Pa[4*x+2]+Pa[4*x+1]+Pa[4*x+0])div 3;
if White
then
begin
if GrayS
= 0 then Continue;
if GrayS
= 255 then
begin
Pc[4*x+2]:= 255;
Pc[4*x+1]:= 255;
Pc[4*x+0]:= 255;
Continue;
end;
J:= 255;
I:= 255-GrayS;
end
else
begin
if GrayS
= 255 then Continue;
if(GrayS=GrayC)then Continue;
J:= 255-GrayC;
I:= GrayS-GrayC;
end;
g:= 1;
if (I>0) and
(I<=Round(J*1/10)) then g:=
1-0.05 else
if (I>Round(J*1/10)) and (I<=Round(J*2/10)) then g:= 1-0.10 else
if (I>Round(J*2/10)) and (I<=Round(J*3/10)) then g:= 1-0.20 else
if (I>Round(J*3/10)) and (I<=Round(J*4/10)) then g:= 1-0.30 else
if (I>Round(J*4/10)) and (I<=Round(J*5/10)) then g:= 1-0.40 else
if (I>Round(J*5/10)) and (I<=Round(J*6/10)) then g:= 1-0.50 else
if (I>Round(J*6/10)) and (I<=Round(J*7/10)) then g:= 1-0.60 else
if (I>Round(J*7/10)) and (I<=Round(J*8/10)) then g:= 1-0.70 else
if (I>Round(J*8/10)) and (I<=Round(J*9/10)) then g:= 1-0.80 else
if (I>Round(J*9/10)) then g:= 1-0.90;
p:= 0.2;
if White and ((Pb[4*x+2]+Pb[4*x+1]+Pb[4*x+0])=765)
then g:= 0;
Pc[4*x+2]:= Round( p*g*(Pa[4*x+2]) + (1-p)*g*aR +
(1-g)*(Pb[4*x+2]) ) ;
Pc[4*x+1]:= Round( p*g*(Pa[4*x+1]) + (1-p)*g*aG +
(1-g)*(Pb[4*x+1]) ) ;
Pc[4*x+0]:= Round( p*g*(Pa[4*x+0]) + (1-p)*g*aB +
(1-g)*(Pb[4*x+0]) ) ;
end;{endForX}
end;{endForY}
Image1.Canvas.Draw(X0,Y0,C);
finally
A.Free;
B.Free;
C.Free;
end;{endTry}
end;{endWithForm1}
end;{endTextIn}
Knowledge is
abstract to business.
Please do disclaim that statement anyone who can, on any reasonable
related foundation of apprehendable logic.
Search for. None yet found.
:
Business cannot handle
knowledge HumanRight. Slavery. Trafficking. To mention the worst.
Populations
treated as supervised tagged cattle private property
Objects with only one purpose:
obedience or punishment. Slavery.
Trafficking.
A-people informing B-people.
MasterInformsCattle.
Guaranteed historys worst gushing violence
evolution:
not one word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a sign. Not a hint.
SERIOUS STATES DOES NOT
RAISE CHILDREN FOR PROFITING PURPOSES:
Business handles matter,
trade, transport. Never knowledge. No exceptions. Say.
Knowledge cannot
be quantified.
Hi.
Hi.
I would like to have box of wit, and a minor pack of
understanding. Thank you very much.
So: slavery it is when HumanRight
is not recognized.
Knowledge on a
HumanRight foundation is the base of CIVILIZED business: free market :
.. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ..
no business what so ever. Not one word. No dealing. No compromising.
Knowledge can handle
business because it cares for what business has no concept of :
HumanRight.
Family. Friendship. Technological evolution
with nature. Not ON her.
Business without maintained on a strict
HumanRight basis says bye-bye to Civilization.
Market, trade, cannot be destroyed. So:
business it is, with or without slavery.
Say.
APPENDIX: HumanRight ¦ Itera ¦ TheIterationTheorem ¦ TheBeta ¦ TheREVELATION ¦ TICOC ¦ TheMACrevelation ¦ Europe1800+ ¦ DEFENSE ¦ MaTool ¦ TheComposition ¦ CalCards Kalkylkort
THE ITERATION THEOREM (Sw. den allmδnna IterationsSatsen)
REASON FOR A GENERAL CONSTANT IMPROVEMENT IN RESULTS as opposed to CONSTANTLY FAILING TO MATCH
A NATURAL RECOGNITION AND VERIFICATION
The reason why related physics and mathematics succeeds in explaining natural provisions see THE ITERATION THEOREM.
POINT:
NATURAL LOGICS HOLD A NATURAL WAY TO NOT not BE UPSET angry OVER THE FACT THAT THERE IS GOOD FOOD. That is:
A GENERAL WAY TO PROCEED INTO FURTHER SUCCESSFUL ASSOCIATIONS, LEADING FURTHER TO EVEN HIGHER REALMS.
AN AUTOMATIC AUTOMOTIVE SELF LOCKING DEEP PENETRATING PROCEDURE, ONLY ENHANCING AND IMPROVING.
What is that? Say. Can it be bought? No. Can it be sold? No. Can it be weighed? No. What is it then? Does it seem to wither? No.
You mean, my love for you decreases with the tick of time? According to my observations, it rather is the opposed pace that counts.
TheBeta: APPENDIX
Overview ¦ Full Beta
Explanation ¦
TheREVELATION
COMPLEMENTARY DESCRIPTIONS from
EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS the planetary perihelion precession
phenomena values in CHART1
THE BETA COMPLEX SUNS PHOTOMETRIC EFFECT
The decisive end result
IT WOULD SEEM like that the Beta factor
presents some HAZARD to the overall IAU-testing program on the Suns
photometric effect and the entailing results here in UniverseHistory: If the
Beta values is changed even so on a last 14th decimal the entire chart of
results (especially G and mS, not to say the planetary perihelion precession
results: CHART1) will be effectively KILLED, wiped
out, nothing left of it.
The point is with the Beta factor, that
it contains inner MATCHING interatomic distance parameters that we anyway
cannot handle by exact average values due to the normal physics where always
a solid state interatomic fluctuation morphology exists. It is shown here, by
alternative values, that these can be altered within acceptable margins and
limits of the known material world properties securing the Beta effectively:
no hazard: »Perfect Assembly».
IN RELATED PHYSICS Planck Equivalents SUN HAS A Raw Effect AND A Measurable Photometric Effect. THE DIFFERENCE IS DEFINED BY THE BETA COMPLEX PARAMETERS,
The IAU-test result on
The Planetary Perihelion
Precessions Phenomena
short background
UniverseHistory content as explaining, relating, comparing and referring on modern academic teaching system as an (1800+) unrelated: by DRIFT, not plan and apparently provable primitive (cosmological) occasion in the history of humanity:
all cosmological
details collected
as related and referred under one and the same headline
Namely the foremost present (Nov2022+):
TheRESULT
in CHART1 stating that the calculated
values
the planets
perihelion precession values
cannot be reached by present academic nomenclature (relativity theory) despite exact same math rank: AllKeplerMATH.
The REASON BEHIND why modern academy never was invited
not earlier mentioned @Internet what we know
needs some related description of a deeper nature. Test some of the answers in WhyCANNOT.
article
securing a
continued reasonable IAU-test precision end result in the planetary perihelion precessions, as
deduced in related physics from AllKeplerMATH.
Provided a continuing preservation of the acquired IAU test precision
Associated DOCUMENT details: T2014PantB.htm ¦ T2014Graf.htm The4P ¦ FysikaliskaGrundbegrepp2.htm#OverviewJan2023
THE BETA PARAMETER
SECURES INTERNAL parametric ATOMIC MARGINS
Explanation
We continue the description [ from TheElectricConstant ][ from TheRESULT ][ from CHART1 ]:
ITERATING THE K-CELL PARAMETRIC COMPLEX in preserving the 12 decimal Sun photometric IAU international standard (2015)
3.827500000000 T26 W ± 0.0014 significands
also entails a preservation of the general bETA parameter (at present 8Feb2023)
1.16324540739068 = bETA ;
= 1 + 14.64973110000000(dS¦2.96000000000000 t10 M χ dC¦2.65632000000000 t8 M) ;
BETA = 14.64973110000000 = (Table) ;
β = [d(S¦Solytan)/d(C¦fastaMaterien)]/[P/(Pmδt P)] = [(Tγ/TP¦J)/(Tγ/TP¦S)] ;
β = [d(S¦SunSurf)/d(C¦solidStatePhy)]/[P/(Pmes P)] = [(Tγ/TP¦J)/(Tγ/TP¦S)] ;
BETA = F99/D99 (KcellAnalays2018.ods T2 E92) = 14.64973110000000
= (E97/E99)/D99
= (TγSunRIM χ TPLANCKSunRIM)/(C97/C99)
= (TγSunRIM χ TPLANCKSunRIM)/(TγEARTH χ TPLANCKEARTH)
These decisive parametric factors are completely unknown in modern
academy as explained:
TheCAUSE:
UNKNOWN PHYSICS PREVENTED MODERN ACADEMY FROM
UNDERSTANDING THE PHENOMENA OF PLANETARY PERIHELION PRECESSION
Situation 8Feb2023: on a still preserved IAU SunPhotometric 12
decimal precision 3.827500000000:
6.67010000933003 t11 JM/(KG)2 .... G universal gravitational constant
1.98963199772617
T30 KG .............. mSUN
present
Sun mass @SunAGE: 20.805 Gy
shorter:
Modern academic (1900+) cheer
for relativity theory led the academy to oblivion for reality. Do disclaim anyone who can. Searched
for. Non yet found:
relativity
theory blocks natural understanding because it kills related physics.
ESPECIALLY ON THE LEVEL OF MATHEMATICS. Compare AllKeplerMATH.
Modern academy cannot calculate collect the CHART1 accounted related physics values. We dare say: no way.
Absolutely do show some disclaiming argumentation. And we will surrender immediately.
Searched for. Non yet found. AllKeplerMATH.
AS RELATED: Albert Einstein definitely did
not understand basic Kepler-Galilei-Newton kinetic-mechanic-physics
[Newtons Famous Vessel Experiment on
Rotation explaining inertial reference experiment ].
No
way. Compare
Fφrsφk att tδnka er att det finns en enda kropp i
universum, vilken bildas vεrt KS [Einsteins transkription fφr koordinatsystem].
Denna kropp bφrjar rotera. Enligt den klassiska fysiken δr de fysikaliska
lagarna fφr en roterande kropp skilda frεn dem som gδller fφr en kropp som inte
roterar. Om trφghetslagen δr giltig i det ena fallet, gδller den inte i det
andra.,
FYSIKENS UTVECKLING
Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld · Natur och
Kultur 1938 · sidan 178
translated
» Try to imagine there is only one
single body in the universe, which constitute our KS [Einsteins
transcript for Coordinate System]. This body starts to rotate. According to classical physics the physical laws for
a rotating body is separated from those holding for a body which is not
rotating. If the inertial law is valid in the one case, it is not in the
other.»
Einstein FYSIKENS UTVECKLING 1938 s178 [Physics
Development] on TheRotatingBody a true disclaimer of Einsteins ideas:
Det strider sεlunda mot sunda fφrnuftet att tala om en
enda kropps rφrelse. Den klassiska mekaniken och det sunda fφrnuftet rεkar hδr
i en vεldsam konflikt,
FYSIKENS UTVECKLING
Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld · Natur och
Kultur 1938 · sidan 178
translated
» It hence contradicts common sense to
talk about one single bodys motion. The classical mechanics and the common
sense here encounter a violent conflict», Albert Einstein, Leopold Infeld 1938.
See also the general TheVIC modern academys 1900+ famous cheer for relativity.
FROM WHERE ON EARTH AND IN ANY HEAVENS DID EINSTEIN
GOT HIS IDEAS OF CLASSICAL PHYSICS?
According to classical physics the physical laws for a rotating body is separated from those holding for a body which is not rotating. There is nothing such in Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics. No way. See Summing1800+.
also entails; EXPLAIN
WHAT MARGINS?
INTERATOMIC DISTANCES
(on any given average mean density condition, any material in any state)
experience FLUCTUATIONS (interatomic vibrations, resonances, coupling).
The bETA factor (1.16324540739068) as a constant contains these MINOR
WITHIN THE REASONABLE ATOMIC DISTANCES
fluctuations:
bETA preserves internal atomic fluctuations
»within reasonable limits»:
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T2 M44
some of the values tested and used during the evaluation
SunGravitationalRadius: rGsun = [ρr(8/mA)1/3/r0]1/4(3/4π)1/3[(1/m0SLIM)1/3 (1/mS BEGIN)1/3]1
SunRawEffect: Praw = ε0[4π(rGsun)2]2 ¦ ε0 free space electric constant
WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
IAU SunPPHOTO: iauPpho = 3.8275 T26 W ± 0.0014 (international standard, Suns photometric effect [2015¦2018])
TNED K-cellSunTest Ppho = Praw · bETA = 3.827500000000 T26 W (at present 8Feb2023):
CheckRelations:
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T2 M50
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T2 M29
Testing a preserved 12 decimal
IAUphotemetricSun standard, it was (Jan2023) observed that several »end
precision matches» did not resolve on the last 13-14 decimals. There is, right
column, a rest of a 20-25 t14 number.
We see (CheckRelations)
that the reason is »a seemingly incongruity» i the bETA factors number
1.16324540739068 = bETA in the TNED
testing charts (iauPpho/Praw / BETA): the IAU spouse is OK.
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T2 J46 the previous / Beta in
CheckRelations ..007 has now reached a
perfect nominal IAU match.
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T2 M38
By a final 14-15 decimal bETA addition of from
1.16324540739068 = bETA
to
1.16324540739075 = bETA
also the TNED IAU-test photometric
result receives a 14 decimal preserved 3.82750000000000 significand
on the previous acquired G and present Sun mass mS significands results
G =
6.67010000933003
mS =
1.98963199771721
MEANING:
Adjusting end (13+) decimals in bETA to
match for a preserved IAU standard significand (zero differences), offers no
HAZARD to the general iterated result but can only be interpreted as a more
precise end result.
The difference (over 12+ decimals) is (easily) incorporated in the
general bETA factor MARGINS, as exposed.
How come this whole UniverseHistory has
been so successful in its own related domain?
OR SIMPLER: How come we experience Progress at
all?
What is that the fact that it is possible to
proceed, even into further successful domains, whatever these may be.
AllKeplerMath example:
What is the reason for that (The author has completely
misapprehended the whole performance .. some say ..),
at the same time Modern Academy just advances further AWAY FROM nature:
WhatsUp?
INTELLIGENCE disorder ¦
order no unitive idea
THIS
VIEW IS apparently NOT THE WORK OF NATURE. IT suggests a PARASITE ON NATURE:
ANIMAL RIGHTS suspended. SPECIES: suspended. Destructive society pictured. Say
again.
First we identify the troubling machinery part. Then, when we understand the
machine error, we make corrections until it adopts to Physical Laws. There is
no voting on that. Just Law Knowledge.
Suzanne Simard 2012
with colleges: SPECIES develops during billions of years through a common
underground net work of root fungi exchanging nutrition and substances
providing the environment for its general development. Zero above ground
cutting. No natural kill of the imperative root net work life developing
system. BUT These Forest Apparently correct if wrong most prominent upright
Aces, bring a definite END to that life sustaining providing species
maintenance. No sir. No more fucking root net working systems. It is an
apparent embarrassing obvious profiting enterprise with zero understanding of
Nature. Sane humans dont do that. So: Where is world jurisdiction: why is this
obvious life destructing madness allowed to exist? Is it because world
jurisdictional instances are the payed bitches for sustaining the vital oxygen
to the actual enterprise? WhatsUp?
There is obviously a good answer in
mathematics as such.
(But, as usual, it opposes Modern
academic idea of ORDER entropy:
MAC: entropy means destruction more disorder
with the tick of time (modern
academy).
TNED: entropy means construction more order
with the tick of time (Nature
Preserved).
same math. Different preferences.
).
See details in THE ITERATION THEOREM:
Short:
EITHER we approach a Natural morphology and find that the sculpture
just improves for each new detail worked out: convergent
just better and better.
OR there is LESS acquaintance With Her (The Natural). Meaning: divergent
result: the more we work on It, the worse it gets.
If She is there (The Wisdom to guide
us amateurs when we get lost as we do now and then) there is always good
hope.
Just ask for Her and She will be there.
ImageSource: Authors Archive 12Sep2012 E28
Bild177 ENTROPY Purposefulness semingly completely unknown in modern quarters:
Never fails.
TheIterationTheorem: 8Feb2023 TIT ¦ EX1 ¦ EX2 ¦ EX3 ¦ TheSINE ¦ TheIteratorMechanics¦ DelphiTSELITprogram
THE SELF LOCKING ITERATING THEOREM
Each expressible
mathematical function F which is so POSITIONED
in the 2D xy-plane as to
INTERSECT touch the ITERATOR line y=x (The ITERATOR)
through any F.s functional tangent slope
within the 2D systems ±45°cone domain (The
Iterator Mechanics)
generates automatically functionally
convergent results as variable inputs
»natures inbuilt life chemistry harmonizing
universally biological algorithm»
the only one we know of
REGULA
FALSI ITERATIONS (from Latin, itera're, repeat)
THE
ARITHMETIC ALGEBRA SELF GENERATING EQUATIONS Root calculations Through
Iterations (also named by convention: Regula Falsi)
An
archived BellDHARMA production 19Oct1987 ¦ 14May1991 ¦ 7Jan2023
functional intersections we AVOID
the term root »equation
root» in related mathematics because IT has Clear issues WITH the concept
of Number Of
Functional Intersections
STUDYING EXAMPLES WHY ITERATE?
Finding precision numerical values on y=x intersections
graphical solutions
single INTERSECTIONS
[ » roots
»] common to several individual equations including
y=0 on a single
function application as the one left below
EXPLANATION: Equation Teaching in General is a humongous extensive domain that can kill any interested new beginner in geometry and its mathematics into the bone and It will NOT be touched here or further mentioned except on these introductory lines. In this exposition, we are only interested in any available direct explaining arithmetical method for finding a more exact value if at all for a specific equality between two given mathematical expressions whatever these may be, and as far as we understand any of it.
GINS graphical intersection has only one single intersection point for one single y=x graphics root in a single or system of equations
ESYS equative system
solution involves a Root Multiplicity
concept one
GINS can have a multiple root, type (x + 1)5 compromising the entire Clarity in the
GINS concept, and so
effectively Killing the simple and direct GINS mathematical
geometry Apprehensive Nomenclature: One for One. Shorter: established ESYS nomenclature »kills GINS
nomenclature». No ESYS treat here.
See MACex example by quote.
EX123: EX1 ¦ EX2 ¦ EX3 ¦ TheIterationTheorem
AuthorsArchives 1987-1991 Iterations on nth
degree equations Manually drawings [ ROTRING DRAWING TOOLS] with support from
technical calculators [CASIO fx-39 SCIENTIFIC CALCULATOR]
In EX1 there is
only one xy-variable function: its intersection points counts for all x where y
= 0 the one function and the x-axis.
In EX2 there are
two xy-variable function: their intersection points counts for all x where y =
0 only between the two xy-variable functions.
In EX3 there are
two xy-variable function: their intersection points counts for all x where y =
0 only between the two xy-variable functions.
Why?
Why iterations?
ANSWER if at all:
finding precision numerical values for intersections
between several intersecting if at all mathematically expressed FUNCTIONS
(in geometry and physics in general);
algebraic solutions for equations with higher degree than n=2 are
(normally) considered a (very) complicated exercise.
Then an iterative approach
may solve the arithmetics (gallantly).
y = x3 3x 1 ; = 0 : wee seek the x-points where the graphic curve touches the x-axis:
y1 = GF1 = x3 3x 1 ;
y2 = GF2 =
0 ;
y(Gx) = ( y1
= y2) =
0 ;
¦ collects all Graphically INterSecting
GINS
point x-coordinates on the x-axis:
= ( y1 y2) = 0 ;
= ( x3 3x 1 0) = y1 ;
The fastest and simplest
provided a computer and a spread sheet program (Free OpenOffice) no specific
algebraic (often time consuming) developing jobs needed
THE MOST SIMPLE METHOD NO DIRECT NEED FOR AN
ALGEBRAIC »HELP
ME OUT» JOB
same end result
TOOLS: 0. a computer. 1. a simple graph drawing program.
2. Free OpenOffice Spread Sheet program. 3. Some basic familiarity with basic
math [ we grow with its practice ..].
See explaining method in GenEXManualIterations. FINDING A PRECISION DECIMAL VALUE IN
A GRAPHICAL FUNCTIONS INTERSECTION:
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 A1
Write in an approximated y=x value as read (as above illustrated)
approximated from a drawn graph on a given y(Gx) equation, as here: 0 = y = x³ 3x 1 into a (type) A3
spread sheet cell (Free OpenOffice) ¦
Duplicate the A3 value to A1 ¦
Write the entire y(Gx) formula into cell A2 referring its
variable to A1 ¦ Adjust iterate A1 until A2 = 0.0000000.. (Decimal by decimal.
WE will most certainly find our own way perhaps a little creepy in the
beginning, but faster as »we get the hang of it»). Alternatively we must
develop some algebra just on finding the same end result.
We continue here on more direct algebraic synthetics.
-------------------------------------------------
y(Tx) = algebraically developed isolated x a self locking iteration equation gives precise decimals:
algebraically developed EX1 y(Tx): -------------------------------------------------
0 = x3 3x 1 ;
= x(x2 3) 1 ;
1 = x(x2 3) ;
x = 1/(x2 3) ;
|
the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x
form] ; y(Tx) = x ;
yTxS1 x = 1/(x2
3) ; first single = 0.347296355 ;
See |
|
x2 3 = 1/x ;
x2 = 3 + 1/x ;
|
; the actual Iterating
numerical solution [the y iterators x form] ; y(Tx) = x ;
yTxP1 x =
±√(3 + 1/x) ;
first pair +: 1.879385242 ;
: 1.532088886 ;
|
|
analysis first single EX1 1/[x² 3]:
METHOD WITH ELECTRONIC CALCULATOR
PRESS manually repeatedly [typical, our example]
0 x² 3 = x1
.. x² 3 = x1 .. x² 3 = x1 .. x² 3 = x1 .. x² 3 = x1 .. x² 3 = x1 .. x² 3 = x1 ..
(Program it so, if it has a programming
feature [it probably needs a specified
LoopLength ..]).
With som patience, we see the number of fix decimals steady growing, .
METHOD WITH SPREAD SHEET ¦ FreeOpenOffice ¦ [ this character
version in Swedish ]
analysis
first single EX1 1/[x² 3]:
Beginning from
IT=0 in this example is slightly faster:
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 E38
ExRow39ColF:
Write the iteration start value most often 0 or ±1:
Write the cell code in next column cell as illustrated above cell40;
MARK F40 hold Shift and let further cells below be marked as well:
Press Ctrl+D (duplicate) and OpenOffice automatically fills in the
consecutives
immediately showing the result as above in the F column
(sometimes many more cells are needed
if the convergence is slow the IteratorMechanics
explains some basics).
analysis
first pair EX1 √ 3 + 1/x:
SAME ROUTE AS ABOVE, ONLY OTHER EQUATIONS.
D4iTx: Program
If a y(Tx) has been extracted an
algebraically developed »iterativable» (iterative self locking) equation :
WITH A SPREAD SHEET: As exemplified in the spread sheet Analysis
above; write it directly into a column of a spread sheet (Free OpenOffice),
referring each to the other (beginning from typically 0), top to
bottom.
WITH A WINDOWS DEVELOPING PROGRAM (DELPHI4 ProgamExample):
Write the equation on the actual
programs terms, and run the program in explicit (for each specific in written
equation).
ALTERNATIVELY
incorporated in Delphi4Test2022 (Unit2Addition12Feb2023):
PROGRAMMERS @INTERNET: DEVELOP FREELY AVAILABLE ADVANCED DRAWING PROGRAMS
FOR HumanRight HUMANITY TO DEVELOP THROUGH as an advanced pen and paper (and stop fooling around) is there any alike out there?
When will
Internet be free again ever, like type 2008: no surveillance: HumanRight
attended, not Microsoft and Google? FREEDOM FROM OPPRESSION. UN WORLD JURISDICTION BANNS
COOKIES. RESPECT FOR HUMANITY RESTORED. EDUCATION REINSTANED.
RightClick in MathPan opens CrossCoordinate pixels single
step Checks ¦ execute y-value with normal F11 ¦ return HOME.
HOME with
iteration enabled: AltP
toggles Rect/Pol
Edit2 Edit3 Edit4 MathInputPan Multiple
Draw: Ctrl+NumpadDecimal
Label1StatusInfo:
@=y(Tx)iterationStart
in ±range 0-9 with 0.1-0.9 ¦ D=Decimals ¦
Q=Turns ¦ mS=CPU ExeTime in milliseconds
ClipBoardCopy:
x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦
0(i09)+(1/[3+x'2])+0(x)
CapsLock ON: CopyToClip. Edit3: m
after number =
Start iterateMinus.
We can combine direct graph
drawing with a presented result from a developed y(Tx) equation
if we include a (here) cryptic (default)
0(i09)+ before the
last drawn active yTx-graph (the i in i09
replaced by a zero 0 nullifies the function and just draws).
The result is presented with specified (9 or more, or less)
decimals with an iteration (0) start (0 before 9).
Removing the i with an 0 tells the program to handle 0(009)+
as a zero term so that we can draw other parts independently.
We can now directly test any extracted self locking iteration
equations result on the fly.
IterativeSTATUS: D4iTx
Edit2 Edit3 Edit4
MathInputPan AltP
toggles Rect/Pol
iteration ignored
iteration
acknowledged @0 D9
x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=0 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9
¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+(1/[3+x'2])
CAPS LOCK ON: TEXTRESULT STATUS TO CLIPBOARD
EXECUTE ALL NORMALLY BY F11
iteration
acknowledged @0.1 D9
x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=0.1 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦
0(i.1.9)+(1/[3+x'2])
iteration
acknowledged @0.1 D9
x=-0.347296355 ¦ @=-0.1 ¦ D=9 ¦ Q=9 ¦ mS=0 ¦
0(i.1.9)+(1/[3+x'2])
StartIterate@
RANGE:
±0-9 ¦ ±0-0.9 ¦ letter m in Edit3
(Interval) sets start @minus (the m has no other use).
Decimal
range (>15=15):
1-15.
Max
QTurns:
1000.
♦ On especially LONG ranks:
The leading root iteration input after 0(i09) .. shold be a regular ..±(1)[..]'0.5 ¦ Otherwise the drawing program may not compute the
result at all.
General method
Given at least two GRAPHICALLY FUNCTIONAL equation system equivalences
y1 = y2 = y3 = y4 = .. = yN (normally seldom more than two)
the GINS (Graphical intersection) x coordinates between the yN equivalents are projected on the x-axis as discrete x-values by SUBTRACTING (writing on a general sum as equal to zero) any one equivalent of the yN candidates as a new graphical function
y(Gx) = y1 y2 = 0
From there it is our job to resolve the remaining tails on whatever means we understand of them:
y = (x 1)2/4 = 2x2 x4/2 ; = 0
(EX2):
y1 = (x 1)2/4 ; = (x2 2x + 1)/4
y2 = 2x2 x4/2 ; = x2(2 x2/2) = x2(4 x2)/2
y(Gx) = y1 y2
The yGx
projects the summing intersection x-coordinates on the x-axis.
= (x1)2/4 (2x2 x4/2)
= (x1)2/4 x2(4 x2)/2
= 0 ;
From here: We try to break up the y(Gx) expression aiming at finding The appropriate self locking Iteration Equation with precise GINS values in possible (a±x)1 and (a±x)2 factors
(because it turns out that the optimal solutions have algebraic/arithmetic end stations on square ±roots or a single GINS):
(x
1)2/4 = x2(4 x2)/2 ; Exemplified Compiled Accommodated
Developments :
(x
1)2 =
2x2(4 x2)
= 8x2 2x4 ; THE MISSION is to Try to simplify as
much as possible { on degrees 1 and 2 }:
x2 2x + 1 = 8x2 2x4 ;
1 2x = 7x2 2x4 ;
1/2 x = 3.5x2 x4 ;
0.5 x = x2(3.5 x2) ; two found second degree expressions
should hold our GINS answers:
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x form] ;
y(Tx) =
x = ±√ [(0.5 x)/(3.5 x2)] ; first pair
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x form] ;
y(Tx) =
x = ±√ [3.5 ( 0.5 x )/x2] ; second pair
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 L37
Modern Academy does not Recognize give Credit to
Nature. Why? Please share:
Internal
mechanics of mathematics apparently no human hand has made any of its innate
logic and
no other either, what we know. We get it for free: it is here to help. But there are some aces suggesting otherwise.
Any Site, Page, Domain @Internet even
THINKING of locking any one person out and away from science, mathematics,
physics, in even Attempting to introduce a dictated apparently stupidized
agenda on social intercourse with such idiot phrases as LOG IN and the like; please share That Inducement EDUCATE US for such a
very apparently direct Cosmic Deep Fucked up Idea, so that all the fine
upstanding rest of humanitys assholes also can enjoy the common idea of .. the foundation of freedom,
justice and peace in the world. Say again.
DELPHI(4):
Exexution time 0mS: less than
1mS. D, used
number of significant decimals. Se DelphiTSELITprogram.
MATHEMATICS IS DISCOVERED NOT CREATED does
modern academic PhDs have a Problem with that? Apparently, yes. See quote below.
Mathematics five foundational laws how the whole story
began .. The Term has no here known modern academic correspondence.
WHY IS IT THAT Modern Academy does not Recognize give Credit to Nature. Why? Please share:
Children and
Animals can handle it, gallantly. How about the rest?
Fascistic
Ideation no HumanRight mentioning by DRIFT. Not plan.
EXAMPLE:
Mδnniskan har skapat
matematiken, dδrom δr alla lδrde φverens,
Sveriges Radio Vetandets Vδrld 25 mars 1988:
Swedish Radio [Program 1]: Knowings World, 25Mar1988
translated:
Modern Swedish Academic Standard:
Man
has created mathematics,
thereof
are in agreement all the educated.
Is it not such a joy to
share Math with these wonderfully cosmologically assembled aces.
Say. Educated. Very high
IQ. MustBuyBook.
Not one word HumanRight. The only existent Knowledge Domain: gravitation. electricity: LIFE. .. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ... Not a sound. Not a hint. Not a spell. Modern Academy 1800+ . It is such a joy to share Math with these
aces. .. to the end that every individual and every organ of
society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall .. . What Swedish state administrations and other?
Do say.
Mathematics: LIFE. Every single peace of it. Isnt that just gorgeously wonderful. Say: Not a spell. Do you see any? Do tell.
Educated. High IQ. MustBuyBook.
Modern academy (1800+) did not what
we know of make a proclamation that
the aim was to develop a general cosmological stupidity. No sir. No way. So:
How come nothing else shows up from those quarters? Do tell. State
administrations that SHOULD be »on the top of everything: only the best of
the best: well educated, wise, alert, strong». In practice: a veritable pandemic sewer gushing violence. UN: Stop killing
humanity.
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 N37
Modern Academy does not Recognize give Credit to
Nature. Why? Please share:
Internal
mechanics of mathematics apparently no human hand has made any of its innate
logic and
no other either, what we know. We get it for free: it is here to help. But there are some aces suggesting otherwise.
y = 0.125x3 1.5x + 0.5 = 4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x) ; = 0
The logarithmic
part of this work was (by its time, 1991) just an authors personal note to
enhance the hang of it. It has no further significance in this presentation.
(EX3):
y1 = 0.125x3 1.5x + 0.5 ; = 0.5(0.25x3 3x + 1)
y2 = 4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x) ;
y(Gx) = y1 y2
The yGx
projects the number of summing graphical GINS intersection x-coordinates
on the x-axis.
Graf
Unit50 y = [(0.125x'3)(1.5x)+0.5]+4/[(0.16x'3)+(0.8x)+(1/x)]
= 0.5(0.25x3 3x + 1) + 4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x)
= 0 ;
From here: We try to WE HAVE TO: must break up the y(Gx) expression aiming at finding The appropriate self locking Iteration Equation y(Tx) with precise GINS values in possible (a±x)1 and (a±x)2 factors
(because it turns out that the optimal solutions have algebraic/arithmetic end stations on square ±roots or a single GINS):
4/(0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x) = 0.5(0.25x3 3x + 1) ;
8 = (0.16x3 + 0.8x + 1/x)(0.25x3 3x + 1)
= 0.16x3(0.25x3 3x + 1) + 0.8x(0.25x3 3x + 1) + (1/x)(0.25x3 3x + 1)
=
(0.04x6 0.48x4
+ 0.16x3) + (0.2x4
2.4x2 + 0.8x) + (0.25x2
3 + 1/x)
= 0.04x6
0.48x4 + 0.16x3 + 0.2x4 2.4x2 + 0.8x + 0.25x2 3
+ 1/x
= 0.04x6 0.48x4 + 0.16x3 + 0.2x4 2.4x2 + 0.8x + 0.25x2 3 + 1/x
= 0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 + 0.2x4 2.15x2 + 0.8x 0.25x2 3 + 1/x
= 0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 2.15x2 + 0.8x 3 + 1/x ;
0 = 0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5 + 1/x ;
10x·0 = 0.4x7 2.8x5
+ 1.6x4 21.5x3 + 8x2 +
50x + 10 ; = 0
;
0 = 0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5 + 1/x ;
1/x = (0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5) ;
= (P) ;
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x form] ;
y(Tx) =
x = (P)1 ;
D4iTx: input Ex3 single:
0(i010)1/[(0.04x'6)(0.28x'4)+(0.16x'3)(2.15x'2)+(0.8x)+5]
¦ readout x=-0.2112856838 ¦ @=0 ¦
D=10 ¦ Q=10 ¦ mS=0
D4iTx: input Ex3 pair1:
0(i010)±(1)[(5+1/x)/[(0.04x'4)(0.28x'2)+(0.16x)(2.15)+(0.8/x)]]'0.5
+ ¦ readout x= 1.7194845338 ¦ @=0 ¦
D=10 ¦ Q=15 ¦ also
works on @=1
¦ readout x=-1.1089220401 ¦ @=0 ¦
D=10 ¦ Q=13 ¦ also
works on @=1
D4iTx: input Ex3 pair2:
0(i210)±(1)[7(4/x)+[[2.15[(5+1/x)/(x'2)](0.8/x)]/(0.04x'2)]]'0.5
+ ¦ readout x= 3.0380481368 ¦ @=2 ¦
D=10 ¦ Q=12 ¦ mS=0 ¦ also
works on @=0
¦ readout x=-3.4959029277 ¦ @=2 ¦
D=10 ¦ Q=24 ¦ mS=0 ¦ also
works on @=0
:
OpenOffice
Calc:
Ex3 single
=-1/(0,04*A10^6 - 0,28*A10^4 +0,16*A10^3 - 2,15*A10^2 + 0,8*A10 + 5)
±Ex3 pair1 = ROT(-(5+1/B10)/((0,04*B10^4 - 0,28*B10^2 +0,16*B10 - 2,15
+ 0,8/B10)))
±Ex3 pair2 = ROT((2,15-((5+1/D10)/D10^2) - 0,8/D10)/(0,04*D10^2) + 7 -
4/D10)
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 A8
0 = 0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 2.15x2 + 0.8x + 5 + 1/x ;
(5 + 1/x) = 0.04x6 0.28x4 + 0.16x3 2.15x2 + 0.8x ;
= x2(0.04x4 0.28x2 + 0.16x 2.15 + 0.8/x) ;
= x2(P) ;
x2 = (5 + 1/x)/(P) ;
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x form] ;
y(Tx) = ;
x = ±√ (5 + 1/x)/(P) ; first pair
---------------------------------
=
1.7194845338
=1.1089220401
GrafUnit50 y =
[(5+1/x)/([0.04x'4][0.28x'2]+[0.16x][2.15]+[0.8/x])]'0.5
(5 + 1/x)/x2 = 0.04x4 0.28x2 + 0.16x 2.15 + 0.8/x ;
(5 + 1/x)/x2 + 2.15 0.8/x = 0.04x4 0.28x2 + 0.16x ;
= 0.04x2(x2 7 + 4/x) ;
x2 7 + 4/x = (2.15 (5 + 1/x)/x2 0.8/x)/0.04x2 ;
= (K) ;
x2 = (K) + 7 4/x ;
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x form] ;
y(Tx) = ;
x = ±√ (K) + 7 4/x ; second pair
---------------------------------
=
3.0380481368
=-3.4959029277
GrafUnit50 y =
[([2.15([5+1/x]/x'2)0.8/x]/0.04x'2)+74/x]'0.5
DelphiTSELITprogram: 12Feb2023
Delphi4TSELITprogram
Write in the equation in Delphi(4) code, then run the program (F9) and click on the form.
Answer is presented typically as shown below.
Add end code: ClipBoard.AsText:= Label1.Caption; if a text clip copy is wanted.
//, momentarily suspended/inactivated program code:
{programmers design or comments}
procedure TForm1.FormClick(Sender: TObject);
var
S:
string;
x,z:
Real;
A,N,D: Integer;
//dW: DWord;
begin
S:= '-Sqrt( (0.5-x)/(3.5-sqr(x)) )';{Delphi formula text}
x:= 0; z:= 1; N:= 0; D:= 9;
//dW:= GetTickCount;
for A:= 1 to 1000 do
begin
x:=
{.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0:}
-Sqrt( (0.5-x)/(3.5-sqr(x)) );{Delphi formula}
{.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.}
if Round((z-x)*Power(10,D)) = 0 then
begin N:=A; Break;
end;
z:= x;
end;
//dW:= GetTickCount - dW;
x:=
Round(z*Power(10,D))/Power(10,D);
Label1.Caption:= FloatToStr(x)+' ¦
'+IntToStr(N)+ ' ¦ ' + S + ' ¦ D='+IntToStr(D);
// + '¦' + IntToStr(dW) + 'mS';
exit;
..
end;{endFormClick}
EX2:
x result turns equation decimals
IN CERTAIN CASES another
start value than x=0 might be needed (±1..).
(Additional program
features, not worked out here).
IF WE DO IT THE RIGHT WAY, THE PARTIAL END RESULTS ALWAYS FAVOR A PROCEEDING CONTINUED ADVANCE ALWAYS FOR THE GOOD OF ALL THE THINGS THAT EXIST: by natural principle
COMPARE THIS ISSUE: why is it
that life chemistry apparently assembles life forms in such a way that these
harmonize not exclusively exterminates each other species forming a general
cyclic biological isotope? WhatsUp? What is the innate natural mechanics for
such an advanced assembling technique?
And what The F Word means the right way?
The EXEMPLIFIED »Iterative Math way» (The Natural Brains Growth Way):
The short version:
»IF even thinking of TOUCHING ME AND I DONT WANT THAT: vaporize».
Natural Defense. Natural assembling technology: brains (»the foundation of constant joy»).
--------------------------------------
IS any exception?
Do you see any? Do tell.
Children and animals handles it gallantly: respect. HumanRight 24/7.
Life Experience:
It is NEVER what we want. No sir. It is ALWAYS the basic natural inspiration what can be done on premises already given (»general friendship»: sharing). Not to TAKE but to GIVE. Ex: An apple.
--------------------------------------
Added to DELPHI4Test2022
Procedure ExecuteGraphEquation(Shift: TShiftState) ¦ Unit2 ¦ r792 ¦;
{12Feb2023¦Iterations¦r70¦r701¦r960¦r971¦:}
if Iteration then
begin
{RepeatEquationGraph
¦ Xr:= rN :}
z:= 1; Q:= 1;
dW:= GetTickCount;
for A:= 2 to 1000 do
begin
Inc(Q);
{.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0:}
EquationGraph;
{.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.·°ΊOo0.}
if Round((z-rN)*Power(10,D))=0 then Break;
z:= rN;
end;{endFor}
z:=
Round(rN*Power(10,D))/Power(10,D);
dW:= GetTickCount-dW;
Label1.Caption:=
'x=' +
FloatToStr(z) + ' ¦ ' +
'@=' +
FloatToStr(iT) + ' ¦ ' +
'D=' +
IntToStr(D) + ' ¦ ' +
'Q=' +
IntToStr(Q) + ' ¦ ' +
'mS=' +
IntToStr(dW) + '
¦ ' +
Edit4.Text + ' ';
if GetKeyState(VK_CAPITAL)=1 then
ClipBoard.AsText:=
Label1.Caption;
exit;
end;{endIterate}
NQ should be the same
Additional code on a few other
places ..
FUNCTION(ex):
See D4 iTx Example THE DELPHI WAY:
IF ANY EXTRACTED ITERATION EQUATION y(Tx)
: WRITE IT IN RUN THE RESULT DIRECTLY
EXECUTE NORMALLY BY F11
CAPS LOCK ON: TEXTRESULT STATUS TO CLIPBOARD
We already have a well working developed graph drawing program in Delphi4Test2022. So: IF we can break in some appropriate additional code, we can use the already working graphic equation standard, with some minor additive writing channeling the program route of the operation type: normal or iterative.
we dont have to
rewrite the solving iterating equation expression explicitly,
as it already is the drawing one
MODERN ACADEMIC ROOT TERMINOLOGY EXAMPLE
Comparing modern academic and
related mathematics basic concepts
The book source below exemplifies on (not illustrated) the equation
y = x3 3x2 + 4:
We clearly see
that the y-function touches the x-axis in only two GINS
(Graphical Intersection point):
The x-solving root of the functions
GINS are 1 and 2:
0 = x3
3x2 + 4 ; x(x2
3x) +4 ; x(x2
3x) = 4 ; x2+4/x
= 3x ; x = (x2
+ 4/x)/3 ;
x = 4/(x2 3x) = 2 ; (x2)2= 0/(x+1) = 0 ; x
= 2 ¦ x2 = ±√
0 = 0 ; one single GINS two ESYS : modern math theory ideas
x = (x2 + 4/x)/3
= 1 ; x + 1 = 0/(x2)2 = 0 ; x = 1
Note that the first x form above
4/(x2 3x) also works as an Iterator equation: it DIRECTLY on one single
turn and operation satisfies BOTH THE TWO
DIFFERENT GINS on IterationStartInput ±1:
StartIterate +1 gives result +2
endlessly.
StartIterate 1 gives result 1
endlessly.
The Iterating Function:
y = 4/(x2 3x) : Both GINS have the same
45° tangent slope directly Through each GINS meaning: »a direct iterative
hit»:
Tredjegradsekvationen x3 3x2 + 4 = 0 kan skrivas (x2)2·(x+1) = 0; alltsε δr 2 en dubbelrot och 1 en enkelrot.
THE CRESCENT DICTIONARY OF MATHEMATICS, 1962: W. Karush ¦ Sw., MATEMATIKLEXIKON,
Wahlstrφm&Widstrands 1991, s296sp1n (multipelrot, eng. multiple root).
translated:
The third degree equation
x3 3x + 4 = 0 can be written (x2)2·(x+1)
= 0; hence is 2 a double root
and 1 a single root.
The quoted source certifies the example;
On comparing a GINS (Graphical Intersection point) this modern nomenclature of a ROOT (solution: »a single intersecting point») differs from a direct visual (graphical) root point and can be misleading and frustrating unless familiar:
the established term double root concerns an algebraic general method nomenclature of solving general nth degree equations (a nomenclature that, apparently, must stay put)
while the root as a single graphical xy point has no double conceptual nature.
AS FAR AS HERE INVESTIGATED on a few hours InternetSearch THESE ITERATION NOTES AND
PROPERTIES ARE NOT FOUND IN PRESENT ESTABLISHED LITERATURE
On the other hand: the subject is Huge and most
often buried in a terminology understandable in time like traveling from New
York to Japan
taking the walking path over Alaska.
Oh yes:
FOUND. It is conventionally termed
FIX POINT ITERATION METHOD.
Wikipedia has a specific article
(partly poorly illustrated at present: However, the principle is clearly
exhibited).
TseliT: TheIteratorMechanics¦ DelphiTSELITprogram ¦ TheIterationTheorem ¦ EX1 ¦
FUNCTIONAL INTERSECTIONS
THE SELF LOCKING iterative ITERATING Iteration THEOREM
as discovered during
the works on drawing curves manually and calculating, analyzing and
dissecting their properties
[ many other persons
have most likely experienced similiar discoveries during the history of
mathematics ]
compare the Parabola y = x² on the Iterator
y=x; x = x²; GINS x=1
and directly all other first quadrant
everything between the positive xy-axes functions with the Iterator.
Each expressible
mathematical function which is so POSITIONED
in the 2D xy-plane as to INTERSECT touch the ITERATOR line y=x (The
ITERATOR)
generates automatically functional
results as variable inputs
same elementary form
y=x
in a consecutive
convergent repeated progress with no end.
»The more we talk, the
more we understand». Sometimes, yes. Not always.
ON WHAT SCIENTIFIC APPLICATIONS IS IT USEFUL?
General signal wave mechanics analysis:
intersecting wave points;
Transient/shock wave interfering mechanics;
General Morphological Design Issues:
intersecting fronts;
General exercise on partly algebraic and
partly numeric solutions to nth degree equations also including integral,
derivative and differential calculus, provided the student is sufficiently
interested and motivated (time consuming, it is).
TSELIT:
THE SELF locking IterationTHEOREM
HOW IS SUCH AN TseliT ARRANGEMENT MADE?
We have two or more different y-equations sharing one
or several same x coordinates
y1 = y2 ;
Sum y1 y2 = 0 with a new x-intersection reporting function
y(Gx) = y1 y2 : this function reports all the Graphically intersecting points on their x-coordinates as y=0 ditto intersections with the x-axis;
use a graph
drawing tool to familiarize
on the y(Gx).
NOW COMES THE DECISIVE PART finding the actual TseliT equations:
SPLIT algebraically the y(Gx)-expression into one single one degree factor (a±x)1 and one or several (b±x)2 two degree factors. WHEN SO DONE:
Equations of ODD degree 1 3 5 7 9 .. have one (a±x)1 and the rest on type (b±x)2;
Equations of EVEN degree 2 4 6 8 .. have only the type (b±x)2..(c±x)2..(d±x)2.. ;
and it is for us
to find those end station algebraic expressions. IT SHOULD NOT BE THE WORLDS MOST
DIFFICULT TASK: basic reckoning laws good for
refreshing practice.
Use a spread sheet (Free OpenOffice), write in the equation in a first column cell, and let the following cells in the same column use the nearest above result for generating new ones until the desired number of fix decimals is achieved.
Some fully illustrated examples are given in EX123: a 3rd, 4th and a 7th degree equation is fully exemplified on full account on the above given points
by detail (we leave no one behind).
WHERE DO WE FIND SOMETHING SIMILAR @INTERNET
TODAY(Feb2023)?
First no direct keyword to
search for:
Nothing at all found of the above illustrated kind @Internet 10Feb2023. Not even close.
The established textbooks (Crescent
dictionary of mathematics mentions nothing of the kind) seem
all to handle the subject iterations on MATRIX ALGEBRA: just
combinatorial algebra. No visual curvatures, no such mentioning.
Results show up first when
searching Images/Pictures:
Oh yes. There is a HEAP of it under the name
FIX POINT ITERATION METHOD
essentially explaining (by illustrations) the functional principle: the here named Iterators iterating numerically convergent generating 45° xy-tangent line.
The observations on the principle in this presentation is based only on this authors works (1987-1994) previous to the proceeding historical commercial computer epoch (Compaq Presario with Windows 3.1, 1994, maybe the first really commercial break through computer with precision printing/plotting capabilities: 33MHz CPU, 200MB hard disk, CRT monitor).
TheIteratorMechanics: TIT ¦ EX1 ¦ EX2 ¦ EX3 ¦ TheSINE ¦ DelphiTSELITprogram
THE ITERATOR MECHANICS
Authors Archive 1987-1991
Authors Archive 1987-1991
IT WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE MANY CURVY
OBSESSED EXPEDITIONS
never really seen in any library literature
at the time.
Today [Feb2023 @Internet] the subject under
different descriptions is found as:
FIX POINT ITERATION METHOD.
With those references we might find some
telling historical corner stones on what is known.
DESCRIPTION
FAST OR SLOW convergent (→←) or divergent (←→) iterations appear as a given iteration equation cuts, touches or intersects one or several (so called) root points, the actual numeric solution we seek. Which is what depends on the SLOPE towards The Iterator the actual fix y=x=tan45° straight slope line.
The functional
root point SLOPE the actual root points functional tangent or gradient
determines whether the root point our solution is iteratively possible. It
so is if the functional root points Slope lies inside the shaded iterative
domain cone ±45°. If outside, the iteration process will recede with still
growing difference between the successively iterated numerical values.
Illustration
If we idealized consider an arbitrary root point along The fix y=x Iterator where the root point's region approaches zero (the above synthesized illustration), we see the morphological form for all possible iteration functions via a small section functional tangent slope of the actual function's slope passing through the root point.
Through these different sloping straight line sections relative the fix y=x, we can understand some basics in how, partly, the function is convergent or divergent. And partly whether the iterating quantities are generated fast or slow.
On studying these aspects and details it is so found that a function is iteratively convergent a solution definitely exists if the root point function's tangent slope lies within ±45° the shaded region domain. The convergence is then most fast around 0° (horizontal). For all other cases the function is divergent, highest rate at 90° (vertical).
IterationTECH: EX123
ITERATION TECHNIQUES
Precise decimal
values on
intersecting graphical xy points between several interfering graphical
functions
THE MOST SIMPLE METHOD NO DIRECT NEED FOR
ALGEBRAIC BREAK OUT JOB same end result
TOOLS: 0. a computer. 1. a simple graph drawing program.
2. Free OpenOffice Spread Sheet program. 3. Some basic familiarity with basic
math [ we grow with its practice ..].
Intersecting
GRAPHICAL FUNCTIONS: taking out the intersecting points
y1 = GF1
y2 = GF2
y(Gx) = ( y1
= y2) = 0
; ¦ collects all Graphically INterSecting GINS
point x-coordinates on the x-axis:
= ( y1 y2) = 0 ;
y(Tx) = x = algebraically developed isolated x a self locking iteration equation gives precise decimals:
=
precise decimal numerical x-coordinate values for the intersecting points
alternatively:
Read out the rounded (1 or 2 decimal) approximated x-coordinates
from the y(Gx) function;
Use a spread sheet program (Free OpenOffice) to manually iterate
the more precise values;
Type example: (»manual y[Tx]»)
GenEXManualIterations: IterationTECH
The
Delphi4Test2022 graph drawing program has automated Absolute features for root
types so we dont have to spend extra time to find out what was excluded:
When writing in and drawing the circles and ellipsis equations, we will also
see the hyperbolic parts.
Write in each specific rounded y(Gx) value in a specific cell (A3 ¦ B3);
Write in the y(Gx) (absolute if roots) form in each corresponding column
cell (A2 ¦ B2)
cellA2: =ROT(ABS(1 - A1^2)) - 0,5*ROT(ABS(1-2*A1^2/3)) ¦ OpenOffice
Swedish version
copy and paste cellA2 into cellB2 the program
automatically adjusts to:
cellB2: =ROT(ABS(1 - B1^2)) - 0,5*ROT(ABS(1-2*B1^2/3))
cellA1:
Use (copy) A3 for start:
Proceed with testing manually
iterating the numbers in A1 until A2 = 0.00000..
Ctrl+Shift+F2
or Click in the top window code bar,
adjust, Enter a new result appears. Repeat.
A2 will shift between a positive and
a negative above/below 0 during the iteration
until all zeroes (determine a fix cell number of decimals
in the [OpenOffice: Ctrl+1, select ..]).
Repeat on cellB1 (and as many others as included).
It will take a minute or 10, depending on practice for each [10 decimal]
iteration end result.
Basic
trigonometric terms:
WITH sinA° the angle A° is expressed
as ArcSine A°, here asinA° and alike for all the others:
Easy to recall and remember sine ¦ cosine
¦ tangent (sin cos tan) inverted as secans ¦ cosecans ¦ cotangent (sec csc cot).
With this
very straight and easy to remember PREFIXxSIN chart the only remaining to
do in order to Get The Conventional Established nomenclature will be:
READ/switch/use the established PREFIXxCOS nomenclature LABELS cos sin ¦ as the PREFIXxSIN related mathematics sin cos. There is no more to it.
PREFIXxSIN ¦ Related Complex Algebra ¦ Trigonometric
Expressions Basic General Swedish edition only¦ secans function MATEMATIKLEXIKON s381 sec x = 1 / cos x.
The thing is: we are broad sighted · · .
And it is natural for us to select a primary preference as such: the horizon
the Sine.
Then we take everything else from there.
Related mathematics and physics. That was how it all started (1976).
FOR THOSE WHO DARE TO PRACTICE A
MORE ALGEBRAIC APPROACH but perhaps more time demanding than the simple
and fast above
ADDITIONAL ITERATION EXAMPLES
INTERSECTION CIRCLE ELLIPS (HYPERBOLA ¦ + 2 outer points)
nothe the drawing programs special features negative root
values are presented as well as positive ditto so we get »optimalALL times»
y1 = √(1x2) ; Circle
y2 = 0.5√(12x2/3)
; Ellipse ¦ 0 = 0.5√(12x²/3) = 12x²/3 ; x = √ 3/2 = Md elliptic major distance [CircleRadius]
y(Gx) = y1 y2
collected x-projecting GINS on x-axis by x-coordinates:
= √(1x2) 0.5√(12x2/3)
= 0 ;
First Pair: TSELIT
inner pair
√(1x2) = 0.5√(12x2/3) ;
1x2 = 0.25(12x2/3) ;
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x
form] ; if found: always gives a precision decimal value:
y(Tx) =
x = ±√ 1 0.25(12x2/3) ; Iterators input: 0 but any number counts fastest from
0
= ± 0.948683298 ;
Second Pair: TSELIT ; tedious on yet unknown conditions:
outer pair
1x2 = 0.25(12x2/3) ;
12x2/3 = 0.25/(1x2) ;
2x2/3 = 1 0.25/(1x2) ;
x2 = 3[1 0.25/(1x2)]/2 ;
; the actual Iterating numerical solution [the y iterators x
form] ; if found: always gives a precision decimal value:
y(Tx) =
x = ±√ 3[1 0.25/(1x2)]/2 ;
=
1.3825475861
; no
such found ¦
34 turns OpenOffice
x =
±√ 3[1 + 0.25/(1x2)]/2 ;
= ± 1.035098339 ;
solved on not
yet known conditions
the arithmetics results seem to be smarter than the author ..
The y(Tx) picture on an
inner positive adjusted sign .. 1 + .. (general hyperbolic from circle
.. 1 ..)
After the
second iterative turn, the rest of the values goes bazooka leaving only two
initial relevant answers. The first 1.37 is verified as part of the actual y(Tx)
as above. And the second 1.035 apparently unrepresented in the y(Tx)
that defines it, however in an aftermath peek verified by the y2-ellipse (in
general elliptic equations). It seems like a riddle, and there is no answer to
it at this stage. However: all the four intersection points were found by
precise decimals.
A short peek on all graphical
combinations some 8 slightly different graphs with alternative ± signs in
the iteration root: still no representation of the x-coordinate 1.035. Where is
it? The yTx takes it strangely but does not show it. The cell Error cause: negative root content.
a = 1.035098339
= √ 3[1 + 0.25/(1x2)]/2 ;
2a2/3 = 1 + 0.25/(1x2) ;
2a2/3 1 = 0.25/(1x2) ;
4(2a2/3 1) = 1/(1x2) ;
1x2 = 1/4(2a2/3 1) ;
x2 = 1 1/4(2a2/3 1) ;
x = √ 1 1/4(2a2/3 1) ;
=
1.3693063938 ; y(Tx) bottom ¦ x² = 1.875 ¦ yet unknown conditions
-------------------------------------------------
y2 = 0.5√(12a2/3)
=
0.2672612419
; ellipse verified ¦ y-coordinate for the x=a-coordinate
-------------------------------------------------
Iterator Iteration techniques
TheSine in PREFIXxSIN:
As all the sine .. have one and the same y=x intersection with lower amplitudes the more sine the faster the iterations reach the fixed decimal precision where the iteration begins @0.
y1 = GF1 = sinx ; Sine PREFIXxSIN
y2 = GF2 =
x ; y2 could also be
used as = x in this example ;
y1 = y2
;
sinx = x
;
y(Gx) = ( y1
= y2) =
0 ;
¦ collects all Graphically INterSecting
GINS
point x-coordinates on the x-axis:
= ( y1 y2) = 0 ;
= ( sinx x) = 0 ;
sinx =
x ;
x = asinx ;
sinx =
asinx ;
sin(sinx) =
x ;
in Delphi4Test2022
DrawGraph also written as: sinsinx
See also further below in ArcSine
-------------------------------------------------
y(Tx) = algebraically developed isolated x a self locking iteration equation gives precise decimals:
algebraically developed y(Tx): -------------------------------------------------
y(Tx) = x ;
x = sinx ; x in radians:
= 0.739085133 ;
42.34645882°
OpenOffice Calc:
KcellAnalys2022b.ods T4 G7
Delphi4IntegratedIterationsTx:
D4iTx: input sine:
0(i09)+sinx
¦ readout x=0.739085133 ¦ @=0 ¦
D=9 ¦ Q=55 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+sinx
0(i09)+sinsinx
¦ readout x=0.739085133 ¦ @=0 ¦
D=9 ¦ Q=27 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+sinsinx
0(i09)+sinsinsinx
¦ readout x=0.739085133 ¦ @=0 ¦
D=9 ¦ Q=19 ¦ mS=0 ¦ 0(i09)+sinsinsinx
The Delphi4Test2022 graph drawing program can handle the successive sine as shown. In ordinary (commercial) version the input would (most likely) have to be written with parenthesis sin(sin(sin(x))).
ArcSine asinx
The same order of iteration solution does however NOT hold for (the same order of) the corresponding asin expressions although there is a GINS by the same value (y=x=0.739085133):
sinx ¦ asinx ¦ x
The corresponding y(Gx) is divergent. The more number of iterative turns, the farther away from the point.
asinx ¦ x
no response: divergent results
cannot be iterated
has no convergent iterative connection
BUT IT HAS AN ARITHMETICAL CORRESPONDING VALUE:
asinx = x =
0.739085133.... really
any definite decimal value we give for an iterative input,
the result diverges with further iterations.
asinx = x = 0.739085133.. = sinx :
IN TRIGONOMETRY (PREFIXxSIN)
it holds that: With sinA=x it holds that A=asinx. Compare (in radians):
With sinA=0.739085133.. it holds that A=asinx (scientific calculator) = 0.739085133.. .
IN TRIGONOMETRY (PREFIXxSIN)
it holds that: With A=sinx it holds that asinA=x. Compare (in radians):
With A=0.739085133.. it holds that sin0.739085133..= 0.739085133.. so then even asinx (scientific calculator) = sinx = 0.739085133.. .
COMPARE IN DEGREES:
sin(0.739085133.. · 180/π = 42.34645882 ..°) = 0.739085133.. .
asin(0.739085133..) = 42.34645882 ..° = 0.739085133.. RAD . [ We have to live with it .. there is no escape ..: basic geometrical mathematics ].
The solution to
asinx = x is sinx : x = sinx in PREFIXxSIN.
As experienced:
In general: IF we Expect some response from the math
side, we have to frequently refresh on the basics. Otherwise: its all
hieroglyphs. All the time. No exception.
Best method: forget. All of it. And then: inspect
where the need is the strongest. Thats it.
The arcsine
The arcsine of the sine (in regular units):
Ctrl+P generates »the pi sign» in the
Delphi4Test2022 graph drawing program [ ASCII
Alt+0222 ή ]
y = arcsin(sinx) = ±x (on periodic conditions) :
the math program uses RADIANS [ 1 Rad = 360/2pi = 180/pi = 57.3° rounded ] by default when
calculating on trigonometric operators.
;
By extending (→) the variable x (n numerically) endlessly
(∞: the quantity independent in related mathematics),
the expression takes the form
y = (n→∞)arcsin[sin x/(n→∞)] = √([x]2)
A general x division with a quantity >1 enlarges the
x-scale dimension: »view more of x»
y = (n→∞)arcsin[sin x/(n→∞)]
= √([x]2)
y/(n→∞) = arcsin[sin x/(n→∞)] = √([x]2) / (n→∞) = Δy = Δx
Because modern academy (1800+) has other inducements in mathematics
(PhysicsFIRST: Δx=dx)
the above rank expression has no representation in modern corridors.
------------------------------------
y1 = sinx ; Sine PREFIXxSIN
y2 = x ; TheIterator
y=x
y1 = y2 ;
sinx = x ;
x = asinx ;
sinx = asinx ;
sin(sinx) = x ;
x = sin(sinx) ; Input 0 or any number
= 0.7390851332 ; 26turns OpenOfficeCALC
x = sin(sin(sin(sinx))) ; Input 0 or any number ¦ faster: 15 turns
TheREVELATION: Compilation 18Feb2023
see also here The BETA factor ¦ Continue From EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS
Related physics and
mathematics
WITH a deduced related understanding of THE QUANTITY INDEPENDENT (∞) in
The Quantity
Independent MasterUNIT ¦ TNED ¦ Euler Equivalents ¦ PhysicsFIRST ¦ How many vertical side
lengths are there in this square ? Answer: quantity independent.
We can clearly see apprehend, understand:
comprehend the line with thickness dx. But it has no physical dimension or
representation. So: Where is it, modern PhD? Say. Please share.
mathematics and physics (PhysicsFIRST) it is not so mentioned or termed in established corridors
Gm22/r = G(n→∞)m22/(n→∞)r ¦ CosmoA ¦ ComIN :
by unknown never formulated reasons, academic literature has no mentioning of the ranks
equivalent simple meaning: endless supply
on limitless extension
although the concept is
frequently met in geometrical mathematics [ComIN]
calculus:
The K-cell our universe in
related physics has a gravitational center [see TheGreatAndromedaTest],
a statement itself burying modern
academic cosmology theory for good. Every single detail.
The results in CHART1 is the end picture in that test
complex.
Modern academy
1800+ invented an idea that our cosmical existence is based on a
LIMITED mass:
HumanRight
gravitation, electricity, basic math as deduced: suspended. Not even recognized.
A Paradise Entrance for Unproclaimed Dictating Nazistic
Fascistic Satanism:
decision,
consensus, authority outside human right recognition. Please be
seated. Welcome.
And so it became, and so it started.
The populated state administrative instances does not even understand
the concept the nomenclature.
we can further recognize (GripDeep) that
Gravitation works equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from: hence independent of time.
LIGHT works different for all matter, CAN be shielded from, and hence is time dependent.
Not present formulations in established corridors: related
physics and mathematics:
light is not gravitation = mass: LIGHT IS MASSLESS = GRAVITATION-LESS
completely centrifugally dead.
light
= no kinetics. No
way. Give us the argument against and we will surrender immediately.
Absolutely.
♦ c and v are not additive in physics. Any such claim or idea, leads to
fundamental misconceptions culture crash.
By DRIFT. Not plan. Say.
light physics
does not connect kinetics
TheSolarEclipses
light does not
develop centrifugation
light is
massless
LIFE our only known Knowledge Domain as in HumanRight has only two components:
gravitation mechanics, kinetics
electricity light, heat, magnetism:
LIFE ¦ Nature ¦ Physics what it consists of, how it is
assembled, organized and maintained
THE REVELATION
200 years of science history 1800+
basic statement:
The entire cosmological physics is explained in every mathematical
detail
on classic Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics with no exception. Please
do try to disclaim: Searched for. None yet found :
single proof:
Every detailed part of the cosmological appearance, from microscopic to
macroscopic with no single exception, is based on a detailed and perfectly
concordant, relatable, explainable down to last atom and deducible mathematical
foundation with the Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics. But
which was never allowed to be perfected
in established quarters (1800+);
That so, because the academic establishment of its time began to
develope derogating ideas about the Logical Status of the Kepler-Galilei-Newton
foundational basics. Then from a rough 1900+
adopting the theory of relativity
modern thinking suggested the Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics to be of a
lower, more primitive order of human ideation :
On claiming a new interpretation of How to State The
Fundamentals of phenomenal physics
including the
apparent modern academic invention of inertial system
EINSTEINS GENERAL RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE
see EinsteinCitat14
with accompanying suggestions that its
foundation should have been invented or introduced by Newton on concepts such
as »absolute
space»
and »absolute
time»,
despite
Newtons own disclaiming on such concepts,
For it may be that there is no body
really at rest, to which the places and motions of others may be referred.,
Isaac Newton PRINCIPIA 1687
SCHOLIUM IV Absolute motion
and the accompanying mathematics
explaining the instrumental measurable observations, modern academy (1900+)
apparently overgave physics as solely founded on Kepler-Galilei-Newton
mechanics.
The first real
observational proof of lights gravitational dependency
(LGD) came with James Bradley (1725,
publ. 1729) on the discovery of The
Aberration effect. But it was never observed as such. And
neither, what is known here, discussed or even mentioned in even close such
terms: not at all.
The academic population 1800+ were apparently no scientists.
Maybe at most »a hyenic mob» of cosmologically assembled
fuckups:
A suitable picture of the 1800s
established scientific community and its level of ideation, we have from its
confrontation with Ludwig Boltzmann. When hearing his proposals that all matter
consists of ATOMS, Boltzmann was bullied by the scientific establishment of his
time (in such content that Boltzmann the year 1906 committed suicide, see
collection of Boltzmann quotes, .. just before
experiment verified his work).
SPIT from a low
level community really can break a human being down to the bone or make it
stronger enough to spit back, resist the bulling, and drive the mob back into
the abyss from where it came.
the point:
Related physics marker:
IF as so stated above, and as so
advocated by existing detailed proof
instrumental observations have explaining mathematical physics,
that mathematics inevitably, irrevocably and unequivocally must relate
unambiguously to the Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics whether accepted or
denied, known or unknown, whether so proclaimed, or not, one way or the other.
No exception.
So prominently the experiments of Michelson and Morley (1881)
unequivocally did clarify that
c and v are not additive light velocity does not connect
kinetics, hence
only confirming the Bradley discovered Aberration effect physics (which
apparently nobody in scientific corridors even reflected on, and still no
response).
Despite the M&M results, modern academy adopted Einsteins v+ic error
statements, defining and deducing the special relativity basic equations.
At that time (1880+) and ever since after modern academy teaching
system never was able to deduce THE ELECTRIC CHARGE and thereby reach
the proper explaining phenomenal physics through the mathematical ranks in THE PLANCK
EQUIVALENTS a late term coined here (some 2000+) in
UniverseHistory (1976+):
Neither was The Potential
Barrier deduced by the same reason: modern academys cheer
for relativity theory sealed all doors and portals and blocked the paths for
finding the true explanations to these basic Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics
foundations: gravitation and electricity
(light, heat).
And so it became how HumanRight
was kicked down (as related): the only existent knowledge domain: gravitation,
electricity: LIFE. Nature.
Our present HumanRight
situation Feb2023:
not recognized as such in modern academic quarters.
Say:
WORLD GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSE: education, merits, community,
social intercourse. Not recognized.
Not one word. Cookies.
Human right intrusion:
If caring for privacy, how come
constantly interrupted without permission?
Test answer:
Because we live in a time where
communication is run by electronics, and there are some specially cosmologically
assembled fuckups world jurisdiction having copyrighted the electromagnetic
streaming as if a privately owned property with MasterInformsCattle.
Not one word humanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.
Violence is gushing out of it.
the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world
Instead of recognizing It (.. recognition of the inherited dignity .. as the
foundation of ..), modern academy started
to derogate It, promoting Majority Decisions instead of Global Academic
Recognitions. Meaning: destructive history. No exception. No way.
And so, modern academy missed the entire cosmological foundational
corner stone: the atomic nucleus (Planck constant h= mcr), gravitations
fundamental form:
The
Planck Ring The Neutron and its (2003
PaintBrush) accompanying THE NEUTRON SQUARE
giving the matrix mathematics morphology (elliptic equations) leading to
ATOMIC MASSES: Practically identical with the experimentally measured.
Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics apparently outclasses the modern academic
corresponding nuclear theory foundation (based on nuclear not atomic mass
defects). Detailed down to the last cosmic atom.
Related physics
(now, here Feb2023 [Begin: 1976]) rewind the modern academy history on these
details, by recalling under the (now, related physics
complete) revealed Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics the experimental
confirmations:
all the most prominent instrumental observations associated with modern
academys continued cheer over relativity theory, claiming credit for the
phenomenal explanations
on same formal
mathematical ranks. See the Jan2023 compiled articles
from EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATIONS (Perihelion
Precessions, Solar Eclipses, Planck Equivalents [the mass increase of the
electrically accelerated electron], Multiple c, and others).
The Real Steel Point:
The related physics central
cosmological proving point:
The ENERGY
INPUT behind the planetary Perihelion
Precession Phenomena:
IT preserves, conserves, and verifies the planetary Kepler Momentum
mathematics (K=vr)
including a (at present) 14 decimal precision value for G (gravitation constant) and the Sun mass
(mS), based on
a Sun photometric IAU vale test (3.8275 T26 W ± 0.0014) with a preserved
alike 14 decimal precision preservation (3.82750000000000), including
a general related physics cosmological parametric test including the
general cosmic Planck heat background radiation (CMB-details)
2.75°K (and others), yearning
The CHART1 perihelion precession result
which
present modern academic efforts cannot reach no matter the
computation power. No way we dare say on the named premises.
Present academic skills cannot calculate (or
even measure, significantly as observed [see related text to CHART1]: not
safely determine) the ANOMALISTIC period of (even) Earths Kepler orbit
around our Sun;
Why not? Because, apparently and provably (derogating the
Kepler-Galilei-Newton fundamentals, as mentioned):
Modern academic
relativity theory has no Kepler Anomalistic.
IT DOES NOT EXIST.
It
excludes relativity theory completely.
Present academic skills use SIDEREAL (»absolute star time») PERIODS
to arbitrarily (for best fit) use the (so, found) most convenient numbers
to match the real related physics Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics deduced and
related mathematics. But there is no sidereal aspect at all
in AllKeplerMath
what modern
academy lay claim to:
The CHART1 perihelion precession related
physics result
as deduced in AllKeplerMath.
Dodge that one, anyone who can.
Bottom line:
That leaves the entire relativity theory on the level of extinction (as a never proclaimed by drift, not plan
fraudulent misconception of physics that no serious scientist ever should have
recognized) completely: all branches, all parts, no exceptions: AllKeplerMath no
relativity theory concepts:
every cosmological detail is
mathematically perfectly explained from a Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics
standpoint never so perfected by modern academy due to its apparent blind
cheer for relativity theory basically simple and straight, no big deal.
Al lKepler Math ¦ The ROUTE ¦ TNED ¦ From Internet@2008 all
basic Swedish editions TNEDbegin1993:
K-cell Heat Physics ¦ Star Physics Part1: Mechanics
Part 2: Classification ¦ GRB Objects¦ The K-cell Inner physics Dark matter Gravitational redshift, »dark energy» in modern
corridors¦
Completely outclassed by simple basic
Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics That Which modern academic ideation
apparently and so provably never allowed a passage for, instead blocking all
possible paths for the cheer of relativity theory.
Shortly after
The Detonation
schematically illustrated on the Neutrons incompressible density maximum tight
packed atomic nuclei 1.82 T17 KG/M³ Dmax
The central eternally 670Gy pulsating K-cell Universe in the
endlessly surrounding Neutron c0-body as explained by The Revelation
gravitation energy equivalent
and the accompanying deduced, tested and verified concordant
mathematical physics based on the works of Kepler, Galilei, Newton, Bradley, Euler and Planck.
Planck constant
h=mcr The Neutron never created, the
foundation of cosmological existence: the fundamental form of gravitation
already standing on a Zero
The only available PERIHELION PRECESSIONAL ENERGY INPUT to
be delivered onto the already Kepler established orbital area momentum works
so, as deduced:
THE SOLAR SYSTEMS IN MILKY WAY
First from a Neutron Dmax (1.82 T17 KG/M³) general solid
state situation before any sunlight did appear (it
takes some TIME for a star to start up and establish its thermodynamical
equilibrium on a fix photometric effect) the primary
planetary bodies were »first on stage»
before any local regional starlight, established on the Detailed K-cell detonation mathematical
physics. All Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics.
With that picture its thorough mathematical physics proof, and as here
stated and claimed with no exception the modern academy teaching systems
cosmological idea goes bye-bye. All the way. Not even dust remains of it. Say
again.
Especially the Kant Nebular hypothesis
with the planetesimals theory. No way.
Claim whatever you want.
The doors are always open 24/7.
Disclaim this, on any available
reasonable logics, and we will surrender immediately. Searched for. None yet
found. Its is all mathematics: ExperimentalConfirmations.
STATE GOVERNMENTAL ADMINISTRATION does not stand above the individual. IT RECOGNIZES ITS EXISTENCE unless openly practiced oppression:
ADDING TO THE ABOVE MENTIONED THIS ONE:
AND THERE IS NO WAY FOR ANY STATE ADMINISTRATION ON THIS PLANET EARTH TO IGNORE THIS VERY PROVABLE NATURE RESOURCE RESULT
OTHER THAN STARTING TO PRACTICE THE REVEALED never proclaimed but still openly practiced HUMAN RIGHT OPPRESSIONS MORE OPENLY, AS DEFINED (unproclaimed dictating nazistic fascistic satanism by DRIFT, not plan: the consequence of derogating, not observing HumanRightRecognition)
OR BEGINNING TO ADAPT: decisions, claim, idea, statements
outside HumanRightRecognition the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world
has only power to destroy:
modern
academys most cosmologically openly hated scientifically related declaration:
$ total biogas, S standing, c cyclic: NATURAL PROVISION up to
1812: Unfolded Leaf&Needle at least 8 flat Earth globe area surfaces:
after only 200 years around year 2000: reduced
to a rough 5 and counting as reckoned on the 30% removed forest area by
human hand: a V8 on 5.
Leaf&Needle [The biologic Oxygen16Filter] we welcome any related disclaiming
argument. Search for, non yet found.
↑
Earth state administrations show no care, takes no responsibility,
apparently does not understand their own daily vandalization of life provisions;
apparently does not even understand the concept, blinded by ideas of deciding life authority
The MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 BIOLOGICALLY BioEK1-10 CONCURRING QUANTIFIED AR123 PROVABILITIES OF mJ=5.975T24KG as founded (BioGAS ¦ jH2O ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ MATIK) ON ITS crust isotopic compositions, ATTESTING A 100% BIOLOGICAL SOLIDITY ONLY on the explicit BioEK1¦1475 MLN1812 documented 100% Nature Preserved Forest Preference (TODAY 2020+ ONLY BY DEFORESTATION REDUCED TO 1254 ADVERTISING A CORRESPONDING GLOBAL TOXIC ALARM EVEN SINCE 1962) is apparently autonomously LOCKED into a position as to exclude any type, sort or nature of disclaimer. Apparently MEANING, Nature says, as so proved:
THE BioEK1-10 COMPOSITIONAL NATURAL BIOLOGICAL HARMONY PROOF never observed in modern academic quarters apparently due to its general contempt for Natural Intelligence Context is, Nature herself apparently points out, impossible to undo, break up or even question on any argumentative base, if correctly apprehended: gravitation. electricity: LIFE. HumanRightRecognition the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world. Saying: Earth State Administrations governments, parliaments has to ADAPT or more openly start practicing their present by DRIFT apparently so beloved decisive fascistic satanism: cookies: the foundation of NOT-freedom, NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the world: not one word HumanRight. Not a hint. Not a sound. Not a spell. Violence is gushing out From It. THAT IS: THE APPARENTLY Highly state administrative unproclaimed by DRIFT, not plan, beloved decisive fascistic satanism: cookies: 24/7 surveilled imprisonment, treating humanity as constantly surveilled tagged cattle, manipulated by governmentally ordained flashes of light and sound forcing individuals to LOG IN for sharing a human social intercourse named social media. Not one word HumanRightRecognition. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint. Have your say. Disclaim this on any arguable reasonable ground, and we will surrender immediately. Absolutely It is time to wake up. Because the provisions apparently cannot be more clear that so: UN: stop killing humanity.
STATE ADMINISTRATION GOVERNMENTAL care IS NOT ABOUT DECISION. IT IS ABOUT recognition UNLESS OPENLY PRACTICED OPPRESSION. Good example: Building Administrations have to recognize material properties on physical test methods, securing that the houses we live in does not crash when we sleep or walk in them: There is no imperial decision in that administration, only plain recognition based on knowledge. So the rest of the society also should work. Another good example: motoring enterprise: we study the kink, and repair the crank after available knowledge, tools and time. There is no voting, no majority decisions. Just plain simple knowledge foundations. But in governmental corridors, that simple principle has gone bazooka: the populations in there apparently does not even understand the Concept apparently believing themselves to be Emperors of Intelligence: unproclaimed DRIFTING exercising fascistic highly beloved satanism claimed as sanity: democracy: cookies. Not one word human right recognition. Not a sound.
THE ONLY COSMOLOGICAL INSTANCE KNOWING WHAT IS GOOD FOR another INDIVIDUAL is the one imagining standing above all the others:
DRIFTING Unproclaimed dictating nazistic (A-people over B-people), fascistic (Emperor Informs Cattle) satanism (TheMentalKickOfIT).
Modern
academy (1800-1900+) rejected discarded, repudiated Nature
(Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics) for the cheer of relativity theory so that
the academically educated personnel did not have to care about the logical
relatable explainable details in physics because relativity theory (The v+ic
error, TheVIC) had invented Another Nature (compared to the real steel nature: PlanckEquivalents)
nature discarding method of »multidimensional mathematical geometry» that did not care about the details in physics (EINSTEINS GENERAL RELATIVITY PRINCIPLE: EinsteinCitat14): It just concentrated
on the possible mathematical solutions AllKeplerMath using whatever for a most close fit founded on an invented space
curvature based on a limited cosmological mass (TheRevelation).
EinsteinCitat14:
Skulle verkligen de
fysikaliska lagarnas oberoende av koordinatsystemets rφrelsetillstεnd endast
gδlla fφr koordinatsystem med φmsesidig likformig translationsrφrelse? Vad har
naturen att skaffa med de av oss infφrda koordinatsystemen och deras rφrelser?
Om ocksε naturbeskrivningen fordrar ett av oss godtyckligt infφrt
koordinatsystem, sε borde likvδl valet av dess rφrelsetillstεnd ej vara
underkastat nεgon inskrδnkning. Lagarna borde vara fullkomligt oberoende av
detta val (den allmδnna relativitetsprincipen)..
MIN VΔRLDSBILD s175, Albert
Einstein, BONNIERS 1934
translated:
SHOULD REALLY the physical laws
independency of a coordinate systems state of motion only hold for a
coordinate system with mutually uniform translational motion? What has nature
to deal with those of us introduced coordinate systems and their movements? If
also the natural description demands one of us arbitrarily introduced
coordinate system, so ought nevertheless the choice of its state of motion not
be subordinated any curtailment. The laws ought to be completely independent
from that choice (the general relativity principle).
Yes, Albert. And so they also are in
Kepler-Galilei-Newton mechanics already:
IT IS APPARENT (CollectREF)
THAT EINSTEIN DEMANDED (OR INVENTED) AN IDEA THAT PHYSICS NEEDS AN OBJECTIVE a
Thing REFERENCE SYSTEM IN OBSERVING OR DETERMINING OR ANALYZING PHYSICAL
PHENOMENA. BECAUSE KEPLER-GALILEI-NEWTON MECHANICS HAS NOTHING OF THE KIND,
WHATSOEVER: Einsteins (implied, or constructed) idea of INERTIA (related
physics: resistance to change: state Newtons first).
Related physics:
There are no inertial systems in physics dear Albert. Never was. No
way.
The laws of physics makes no difference between objects and the
states they are at:
Gravitation is equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from: hence independent of time;
AND 1800+ MODERN ACADEMY IS OF COURSE MOST FAMOUS AND WELL KNOWN FOR HAVING GOT THE HANG OF THAT BASIC PHYSICS. VERY HIGH IQ.. MUST BUY BOOK. IT IS SUCH A JOY.
no difference between bodies and their motional states or
other properties.
LIGHT is different to all matter, CAN be shielded from, and hence is time dependent.
Not represented
in established corridors
1800+: The upstarted Kepler-Galilei-Newton Mechanics was never allowed to be
perfected. Instead, it was discarded, treated as Primitive, for the
modern academic cheer of
»lets get rid of God for once and for all»
imagining emperorship over nature, as the history so apparently may be
interpreted [ this author is not religious ]:
relativity theory.Namely its very successful historical mathematical
triumphal procession in front of an increasingly terrified humanity. There is
nothing wrong with the mathematics. The kink is, that mathematics is not
physics.
Related physics:
The Laws of Physics hold FOR systems. Never IN systems.
(Newtons famous vessel experiment, that
Einstein and others apparently never could understand the simple basic physics
foundation of ¦ CollectREF).
Physics holds no STATE
only momentary equilibrium references (dv/dt) instrumental
readouts on balance properties: equilibrium which we
simplify and use as freezed idealized not changing momentarily states with
zero internal changes (»TimeZero»): PhysicsFIRST.
»Hollywood Animations».
Newton was clear on that (no absolute rest: no »inertial system»),
specifically. Especially in his stated
For it may be that there is no body really
at rest, to which the places and motions of others may be referred.,
Isaac Newton PRINCIPIA 1687
SCHOLIUM IV Absolute motion
No mother god loving way Newton makes credit to any idea of an
»inertial system».
There are no such Newton quotes or context. Searched for. None yet
found.
But many writers 1800+ seem
to have a deep yearn of laying such intentions in the mouth of Newton:
According to Newton .. and Newtons opinion ... Text books. Fact
books. Encyclopedias. You name it.
See Newton In Explicit on his
vessel experiment:
There is only one real circular motion of any one revolving body. Clear. Sharp. Exact. But the modern 1800+
academy populations seems to have understood nothing of its content: read: no
absolute space reference exists:
no inertial system. It is apparently a modern academic
misapprehended invention, blocking basic true understanding.
Kepler-Galilei-Newton basic mechanics is
completely free from the modern academic apparently invented apparently by
misconception and misunderstanding inertial systems. Nothing of the kind (STATE) exists in related physics. No
way. Not even on my best day. See further (Swedish edition: modern academic
ideas analyzed) in INERTIA.
Einstein (and his academic followers)
apparently never understood physics. To be corrected if faulty.
This is by far the worst tragedy compiled texts in UniverseHistory.
TICOC: 23Feb2023 THE INDISPUTABLE
CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION ¦ TheREVELATION ¦ TheMACrevelation ¦ Europe1800plus ¦ TheComposition
The
populations never receive education information, teaching: enlightenment of
what exactly HumanRight entails because the European Authorities Europe1800plus have
shut down all such paths by reformulating the original to a more suitable
costume so that The European Authorities can continue in practicing The
Authoritys Authority by continuing the 1800+ handling of the population as
Tagged
Expendable Cattle. MasterInformsCattle.
Regaining Civilization
THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION
THE
INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION
What do you mean indisputable, how can you say that, with what right?
Educate
us. Have your say:
With what right is there a questioning in there? Please relate, explain, show.
It is naturally granted a permit to
introduce
AN INTERRUPT AT ANY TIME
A PERMIT TO INTRODUCE AN
INTERRUPT AT ANY TIME
where life is in a situation of danger or hazard
(police, ambulance, rescue
organized activity)
where HumanRight recognition is NOT observed, (UDHR10Dec1948)
THE FOUNDATION OF
FREEDOM, JUSTICE AND PEACE
".. the foundation of freedom, justice
and peace in the world .."
in specific concordance with (UDHR10Dec1948)
".. every individual and every
organ in society, constantly keeping this Declaration in mind, shall strive by teaching
and education .. ",
on the so explicit apparent corner stone of
civilized perseverance that (UDHR10Dec1948)
"Everyone has duties to the community in which
alone the free and full development of his personality is possible". And
that IT is especially directed onto personnel apparently in explicit on the
level of The Personnel involved in police, prosecutor, court, justice system in
general: educational and public social services, as stated (UDHR10Dec1948):
So tell us, educate us,
European Union: Just give us a single example inside Your Community, whatever, one
singe occasion of a free and full development residence. Just 1.
Whereas recognition
of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and
peace in the world ;
You cant. At present,
there is no such preferences in Europe or elsewhere, what we know. However,
if there is any argument against: please share. That would be good news.
------------------------------------
ILLUSTRATED 2018, and counting MidSweden photos. EUROPE: a villain on
full pedal a humanity killer ON DRIFT, not plan its cheer for PARLIAMENTARY
MAJORITY DECISIONS with zero ZERO humanRight recognition exercising fascism,
dictatorship, satanism by DRIFT. Not plan: Cosmologically Assembled Stupidity
pacing its way through the Galaxy in a universe. Say: decision
outside HumanRight recognition has only power to destroy.
IT DOES NOT MATTER IF THE MAJORITY CONCERNS 1 PERSON OR ONE BILLION
PERSONS:
decision outside HumanRight
recognition has only power to destroy. Unproclaimed dictating nazistic fascisisc exercising satanism. On
DRIFT.
Say again.
SWEDEN is enhancing its global cheer for and interest in Universal
Animal Rights. And counting.
»free and full development»?
What is known about it INSIDE European Union TO EXEMPLIFY ? We need only see one single example:
stop killing
humanity.
------------------------------------
MEANING related cognition and
apprehension:
ANY OTHER CLAIM OR STATEMENT
WILL BE THE PER DEFINITION OF
not-freedom, not-justice and not-peace in
the world:
exercising oppression. So by force
proclaimed or unproclaimed, by drift, or intention.
THE FOREMOST DRIVING MOTIVATION INSIDE
CIVILIZATION HENCE (UDHR10Dec1948)
by teaching and
education
by teaching and education :
Disclaim this:
Present European Union Science and Technology is practicing a Dolls
House Theater with only result to destroy the surface of the planet, still
further [1800+]. Every inch of it.
Show humanity this author is lying. Show the arguments. We will
surrender immediately. Absolutely. The present order of state administrative
ideas is facing its own mad end:
irresponsible, uneducated,
careless. Not one word HumanRight.
gravitation
and electricity (heat, light, magnetism);
insight into these lay the foundation of
any technologically developed culture,
including developed individual skills to
handle matter, materials, navigating their domains, knowing their limitations
and possibilities, in mathematics and physics (chemistry included)
THE PERIODIC SYSTEM OF THE ELEMENTS[]
what we and matter in general are made of,
how it is assembled and maintained,
the grammar of the languages, and their morphological
structures. All
on the premises (UDHR10Dec1948) of
".. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world
..", where (UDHR10Dec1948)
" Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and
association.", and
" No one may be compelled to belong to an association."
NO ONE SINGLE HUMAN BEING MUST BE FORCED TO
ANY ACT THAT IS VIOLATING THE INDIVIDUAL'S OWN human right founded CONVICTION.
No way. By no means, European Court Union Administration. Claim whatever you
want, in whatever manner you want.
SHORTER:
A CIVILIZED SOCIETY HAS NO RIGHT no moral
right, no jurisdictional right, no educational right: no right at all TO
FORCE OBEDIENCE OR TO SENTENCE FOR DISOBEDIENCE ONTO A HUMAN INDIVIDUAL.
No way. Under no circumstances. Under no
conditions,
explicitly again (UDHR10Dec1948)
" Whereas recognition of
the inherent dignity and "
" of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human
family"
" is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the
world".
European Union and its provable educationally
human right oppressing Court in explicit:
stop killing the population
out of its natural entitled human right recognition by suggesting that DECISIONS parliamentarism rule law and order;
Decisions rule destruction. HumanRights ARE the law. Claim whatever you want,
at any time. There is no VOTING on repairing a crank Motor. There is just
knowledge, tools, and time to do the work. Stop fooling around, imagining to
represent Authority. You dont.
RECOGNITION NOT
DECISION: EUROPEAN COURT DID NOT CREATE THE BRAIN, BUT IT APPEARS IT WANTS TO CLAIM SUCH AUTHORITY:
Prussia the basic Nazi
Head was forbidden after WW2. But Europe kept what the Nazi Head introduced
(around 1870), the most humiliating Nazi-fascistic ideogram ever seen under the
stars: obligatory military service. A direct unproclaimed fascistic-satanistic
invention, transferring all civilized human intercourse into a playtable with
MasterInformsExpendableCattle what to do: human life sacrificing satanist
inspired stupid, uneducated Europe and its jurisdictional authorities forced
violence into its populations, under threat of punishment. And so it still is
today named democracy by a growingly terrified population, forced to meet its
social consequences of everyday growing violence. European Fascistic-satanism
on Drift. It was never so intended. But the suckers upholding its practice are
blinded enough by their ideas of power and authority to continue the
unproclaimed drifting satanistic crusade against the populations. Not one word
human right.
FOUNDATION IT IS not state administrative
decision:
All other activity and engagement will effectively KILL humanity and its
possible civilization into a spiral of deciding A-people over sacrificial
B-people, on Decisions made by The A Team, to be obeyed by The B Team,
terrified to oppose The Authorities.
SO THAT ANY COSMOLOGICALLY ASSEMBLED ALIKE
European Convention Exemplified Historical FUCKUP WILL HAVE ITS SPLENDID
OPPORTUNITY TO ENLIGHTEN HUMANITY ON THE MEANING OF LAW AND ORDER: Terror.
Violence. Death of society:
Point plate handcuffed muzzled population
24/7 surveilled and controlled by flashing light signals and sound, treated
like tagged cattle. MasterInformsCattle.
NATURAL DEFENCE
SAVES HUMANITY
DEFENSE
is a natural property inside every molecular extension in Life even in dead
matter (mechanical strength properties: destructive resistance):
It is hence nothing the we humans can CREATE.
It is something we humans must ORGANIZE
on equal standards by again
THE FOREMOST DRIVING MOTIVATION INSIDE
CIVILIZATION HENCE (UDHR10Dec1948)
by teaching and education :
" Whereas recognition of
the inherent dignity and "
" of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human
family"
" is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the
world".
NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BY ANY MEANS OF
FORCE, OR HAZARD OF A RISK FOR BEING
ATTACKED BY TYPE European Convention Human Right Violating SOCIETY
police, prosecutor, court, imprisonment public populations
BECAUSE CONVICTED OF THE EXISTENCE OF A
" foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ":
" recognition of the
inherent dignity "
" of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human
family ".
IF IT EXISTS,
TYPE European Convention Human Right
Violating SOCIETY,
IT WILL BE THE PER DEFINITION OF
not-freedom, not-justice and not-peace in
the world:
exercising
oppression, so by force proclaimed or unproclaimed, by drift, or intended.
RECOGNITION NOT
DECISION: EUROPEAN COURT DID NOT CREATE THE BRAIN, BUT IT APPEARS IT WANTS TO CLAIM SUCH AUTHORITY:
Gushing constantly developing increasing
violence over its populations by DRIFT. Not plan. Just for the cheer of a
personal idea of representing a Power of Authority: obedience.
Claim whatever you want, United Nations:
Your present way allows violence to GUSH
out FROM your corridors, state administrations, governments, jurisdictional
offices, pouring its content over a growingly terrified humanity, standing
completely powerless in front of is gushing raging wrath.
THAT HIGHLY BELOVED UNITED NATIONS CHEER
FOR AUTHORITY STATE OF THE ARTS forces humanity, its individuals into a pool of
impossible social-mental intercourse conflicts
WHICH UN TAKES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR
raising despair and a fundamental state
of powerlessness in the individual human beings associative daily life
that none of us humans can
handle when and if we become its victim:
like a wild animal caught in a cage,
striving with all its might to get free: it will KILL everything in its way.
AND THE UN, ITS STATE ADMINISTRATIONS,
ANSWERS WITH "putting down the foot" ACTIONS STILL INCREASING THE UN
AUTHORITATIVE IDEA OF LAW AND ORDER TO GET THE CATTLE TO BEHAVE AS EXPECTED:
Gushing extended exercised unproclaimed
fascistic satanism. By drift, not plan.
WORLD STATE ADMINISTRATIONS ARE APPARENTLY
KILLING HUMANITY FOR THE SAKE OF EXERCISING ITS OWN SELF PROCLAIMED
AUTHORITATIVE ELITES IDEA OF LAW AND ORDER. Fascism. Not one
word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.
cookies.
MasterInformsCattle. 24/7 surveilled.
So: DEFENSE NOT
FOUNDED ON EACH INDIVIDUALS OWN FREE WILL
".. the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world
.." with (UDHR10Dec1948)
" Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and
association.",
" No one may be compelled to belong to an association."
ONLY and IRREVOCABLY CREATES A
SPIRAL OF INCREASING VIOLENCE.
Show, relate, exemplify any possible
Disclaim:
UN: stop killing humanity.
DEFENSE like all other NATURAL PROPERTIES
should be presented
in detail, every part and domain of it
(from Grade1)
on equal standards by
THE FOREMOST DRIVING MOTIVATION INSIDE
CIVILIZATION HENCE (UDHR10Dec1948)
by teaching and education .
Not to Kill, but to Save. How, Why, The
Techniques. The Life Quest.
All of that which is not present in todays
society.
All human beings, as well as animals, have
the idea of a defense naturally inborn. The only exercise for UN regional
nations: EUROPE is to promote the individual to
DEVELOP ITS INNATE POWER TO EXPERIENCE THE
SATISFACTION OF ITS INSIGHT
on the explicit corner stone of civilized
perseverance (UDHR10Dec1948), that
Everyone has duties to the
community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is
possible. European Court: Give
an example.
You cant. There is no present
competence for that.
Free. Full.
Documented detailed provable
European Convention-Human-Right-Violating SOCIETY:
Give examples. Please.
That would be our most happy moment:
Free. Full.
Do disclaim anyone who can (23Feb2023):
NOT ONE THE F WORD CORNER IN EUROPE HAS IT.
No way:
cookies. Not one word HumanRight. Not a spell. Not a hint. No way. Exercising
oppression.
Motivation. Interest in Human Civilization.
No attacks on peaceful beings. No way.
European Convention-Human-Right-Violating
SOCIETY.
».. must not be interpreted as ..». MasterInformsCattle.
At present, our world situation (Feb2023),
the UN administrations especially The
European Union and its self proclaimed eminent human rights violations on the
subject (Breaching directly the Article 30: The European Convention inventing
its populations as obedient Cattle) are completely impotent in realizing
the actual practice.
Fascism. Gushing violence. A-people over
B-cattle. Say again:
PARLIAMENTARY DECISIONS
AND CONSENSUS
HAVE NO MANDATE OVER HUMAN RIGHT.
Never had. Has not now. Never will have.
Consensus is no scientific
subject. Never was. Never will be: dictatorship if claimed.
Authorities
of society continues to remove the existence we once came from, cutting deep bleeding wounds in
the nature that once existed, but no longer is so allowed, by the Authorities
of society: jurisdictional private ownership excludes HumanRight recognition.
Mississippi 1830. Private Property.
The pain and hurt living beings feel on that credit, is
subject to great contempt from
the Authorities of Society: Not one word HumanRight. Not a hint. No support.
UN: stop killing humanity. Because that is exactly what is
going on:
Business
Enterprise in itself TAKES NOT KNOWLEDGE ARGUMENTATION.
Why?
Because
it cant.
Knowledge is an abstract to business enterprise: quality only.
Slavery trade.
Dolans Cadillac [ 2009, Christian Slater ]. Trafficking.
HumanRight is a knowledge domain: gravitation.
electricity: LIFE.
Business
Enterprise, its entrepreneurs, does not understand that concept.
State
administration should protect humanity from such. Instead it is the payed
bitch.
DECISION OUTSIDE HUMAN
RIGHT RECOGNITION
HAS ONLY POWER TO
DESTROY. Say again.
That so because, as stated
" Whereas recognition of
the inherent dignity and "
" of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human
family"
" is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world
",
ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND MEANINGS AND
STATEMENTS BECOME THE PER DEFINITION OF EXERCISING OPPRESSION,
the foundation of NOT freedom, NOT justice
and NOT peace in the world.
Claim whatever you want UN, in whatever
manner you want:
Stop killing humanity. Stop practicing
unproclaimed fascistic satanism.
Wake up.
The World needs cooperation on already
existing recognized foundations:
by teaching and education (UDHR10Dec1948).
THE INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF
CIVILIZATION
TICOC THE INDISPUTABLE
CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION TheREVELATION
TheMACrevelation: The
modern academic revelation TheREVELATION ¦ TICOC THE
INDISPUTABLE CORNERSTONES OF CIVILIZATION ¦ TheComposition ¦ Europe1800+ ¦ TICOC ¦ TICOC
THE MODERN ACADEMIC INVENTION OF A CLAIMED
DISCOVERED NEW KIND OF MIND APPREHENSION
It is such a joy to share the most eminent of thoughts with the
most prominent of authors in the history of human civilizations. Absolutely.
[] AllKeplerMath ¦ TheROUTE ¦ The REVELATION
¦ CHART1 ¦ CHART3 ¦ Number5 ¦
¦ THEcr
TheMACrevelation 2¦34: 1
[] CHART3 ¦ AllKeplerMath ¦ TheEnergySource ¦ CHART1 ¦ TheROUTE ¦ Number5
TheMACrevelation 3 ¦56: 2
[] Experimental
Confirmations ¦ HumanRight ¦ njut av ett vackert kalhygge
THE GENERAL BELIEF IS THAT THERE IS NO HARM IN WHAT
IS DONE. »WE ARE THE LAW».
The level of educational associative thinking in
Business Enterprise corridors: »We made the brains too». MustBuyBook.
VeryHighIQ.
Business Enterprise in itself cannot handle culture, civilization, technology: knowledge.
Not one word HumanRight. Not a spell. Not a sound. Not a hint.
TheMACrevelation
¦
3
2 1
THE EUROPEAN UNION MODERN ACADEMIC COUNTERPART
BEGINNING FROM The 1800s
2023: Jurisdictional
Slavery: Dictating obedience under Authority Commands for executing Authority
Preserving services, under threats of punishment.
Not one word HumanRight. Not a hint. Not a spell. Not a
sound. The personnel does not even
understand the concept.
Trafficking. Mississippi 1830. Killing life
sustaining physics that built the human brain during some undisturbed zero bald
cut 3Gy biological evolution.
By Drift. Not plan. No such proclamations were
formulated, and no such aim was indented, as we know.
SWEDISH STATE ADMINISTRATION JURISDICTIONAL LAWFUL
OWNERSHIP is continuing its cheer for enhanced respect for universal animal
rights.
The
European Union (except England until 1916) AROUSE ON the 1800s war hungry
European region's nazistic authoritative initiative of proclaiming the
population as an EXPENDABLE B class individuals: »You are now under the
authority of an A class individuals with right to force obedience under threats
of punishment» for the general sake of securing a fundamental new time Ear
with a Core of a National Socialism: »It shall be founded on solidarity and
loyalty with the new deciding A class population»: Nazism. As it
still is. Authoritative Disobedience is Punished. Basic
exercising Nazi-fascism. CORRESPONDINGLY by the same order of matters
as in the new 1800+ modern academic case, the
European Union grew up apparently by
DRIFT, not plan, not aware at all what it was or still is involved in
in still living in its classic imperialistic idea of representing an A class of
individuals governing a lower (MasterInformsCattle) B class of individuals:
»The lower population must Obey The A class individuals with its present
Authoritative costume and order of matters»: Never questioned: not one
word human right. That is how the now and
so proclaimed European Union with its jurisdictional European Convention did
appear (soon after UDHR10Dec1948), as we know our late modern European history.
[] the same reason ¦ TheMACrevelation ¦ UDHR10Dec1948 ¦ Article 30
EUROPE 2 ¦34: 1
Europe
1800+
THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION: continue business as usual.
[] UDHR10Dec1948 ¦ of the greatest importance
EUROPE 3 ¦56: 2
Europe
1800+
European Jurisdictional Court: Why are you mistreating the excellent perfect
UDHR10Dec1948 Declaration?
Because it does not give
us the power of authority we need.
How is it that you cannot comply on its simple
perfect content as the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the
world?
Because we do not have
that type of inducement.
Does it look to you that your idea of authority has
conquered the universe, making it work on your will, on your decisions?
Yes.
EUROPE 4 ¦78: 3
The Natural Farming Landscape ..
A paradise in a universe. Photo: SWEDEN 16May2022
Excursion2 Picture10.
7 EUROPE 1800+ For the sake of performing business outside of
human right recognition (the only existing
knowledge domain there is; gravitation, electricity: LIFE) by drift, not plan, as if the only intended cosmological plan was: Business, outside human
right recognition, by drift, not plan: »We Are The Law»: because inside of it, »we are not experiencing enough free will to do
what we want»: raping, looting, sacking, forcing, intruding, dictating, and so on ..
selling .. buying .. more quality .. Dolans Cadillac .. slavery, trafficking
.. JURISDICTIONALLY GOVERNED BUSINESS AUTHORITY lawful
private ownership on drift, not plan securing a corresponding protected
dictating authority (CHINA): Not one word HumanRight. Because IF business outside human
right recognition was NOT involved (»perfectly
respected market and trade») we would live in a practical global human
right recognized cultural paradise: we already have had all the necessary
provisions from day one. The only missing part is: insight, knowledge how to
realize IT. And the world states cannot realize it because
it does NOT work on Violence or Authority Decision. Same
reason: heavy ego inducement (power greed). Heavy underestimation
of Nature. EUROPE 1800+ 7 |
8 EUROPE 1800+ EUROPE 1800+ 8 |
Europe1800+ ¦ 4
3 2 1
DEFENSE: Europe1800+
THE HUMAN RIGHT RECOGNIZED CIVILIZED HUMAN NATURAL DEFENSE
Gravitation, electricity: LIFE.
Leaf&Needle, the Sun Energy collecting Agency that Brought Humans to Earth.
Woman. Queen of a Universe Wisdom says.
DEFENSE 2 ¦34: 1
WHERE the less touch of a human hand is visible, the more
Life Power nature gives to the individual. Say again: beauty. Woman.
Intelligence. Peace of mind.
[] Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free
and full development of his personality is possible
DEFENSE 3 ¦56: 2
[] UDHR10Dec1948 ¦ HumanRight
DEFENSE 4 ¦78: 3
Business Enterprise Kills Nature
DEFENSE 5 ¦910: 4
SWEDEN is improving
its global care for more universal animal rights: Preparing new land for more
animal hotels. New Wall TVs.
[] the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ¦ UDHR10Dec1948
DEFENSE 6 ¦1112: 5
Europe: have you a problem with tranquillity ease of
mind prosperous association fruitful inspiration? Do tell.
[] HumanRight ¦ the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world ¦ Article 30
DEFENSE
7 ¦1314: 6
DEFENSE
¦ Europe1800+ new technology will be born ..
because the present one is not enough ..
GAMMA PROJECT DETAILS IN UniverseHistory 2012+ it
better be fruitful ..
Tool shops for Craftsmanship. Handicraft, Workmanship,
Individual Scientific Development .. After 2000: gone with the wind. Why?
WhatsUp? Why is Business Enterprise Killing dumping, selling out, murdering
Humanity, Science, Technology, Nature? Please do explain. Not one word HumanRight.
WHERE IS THIS CIVILIZED LAW: No business
enterprise is allowed to to have or perform any activity or engagement outside
an explicit UDHR10Dec1948 recognized human right
recognition. Say again.
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave
trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.. Say again. World
Jurisdictional Administrations.
Business Enterprise in
itself does not understand the concept of
HumanRightRecognition: knowledge. Gravitation,
electricity: LIFE. Sell buy is Not connected.
Zero cultural educational technological
human right Civilized responsibility. A Creepy Prick. In Its
Self.
We hate Communism [ Russia .. China .. Dictatorship .. low
educated, ignorant pedestrians .. ]. But we have to give it The credit that
Capitalism CONTAINS an Ultra Creepy Fuck Family Killer.
Resulting Message: the future belongs to an open and free
market and trade under the HumanRights recognition DEFENSE. Other war parties will NOT win, History already
says and Teaches;
CHINA and Russia, with Associates: Do you surrender freely?
WHERE IS THE
GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY?
In a parliament,
a congress caring for human rights protection, no proposition raises above the
trash can if the proposition cannot secure a RELATED connection to an explicit
human right recognition UDHR10Dec1948 as is. Every suggestion, every
proposition. Any idea.
A congress caring for human rights
protection, does not VOTE on human rights issues:
A congress caring for human rights
protection, OBSERVES AND RESPECTS human rights issues or not at all.
Decision outside human right recognition
has only power to destroy:
Whereas
recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the
foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
ALL OTHER INDUCEMENTS BECOME A PER DEFINITION OF
EXERCISING OPPRESSION:
foundation of NOT-freedom,
NOT-justice and NOT-peace in the
world
Gravitation,
electricity (light, heat, magnetism): LIFE.
Those are the
conditions we live under, not over.
[]
3Feb2023
Different web readers present different Column
Vandalization Techniques : no world company cooperation even on
the simplest of all civilized ABC duties. Perhaps the actual problem is that the programming
personnel has a too low apprehending profit. (World needs
more Oxygen). Up to present: Can only handle simple figures 1 .. 2 .. ¦ The Odd
(first) column preserves the original, but the second (right) column is
elongated.
The original
layout in WORD2000 perfect alignment is destroyed differently on different
parallel text column heights inside the same table height (two columns) by
different web readers. That was not what the author had in mind. Solution:
After spell
check, the text has been PNG-imagized, adding the actual original text links at
the bottom of each column pair OddEven page. Thank you for reading.
HOW BUSINESS ENTERPRISE 2000+ KILLED HUMANITYS 1900 DEVELOPED TECHNOLOGICAL CULTURE OF INDIVIDUAL HANDICRAFT
MATERIALS AND TOOLS
for the human individual to
develop skills through, knowledge about natural processes and their benefit on
a culture of market, trade and technology
THE 2000+ GREAT
BUSINESS ENTERPRISE DRAINAGE OF THE 1900s REACHED HIGH LEVEL OF
MECHANICAL TOOL
SHOP MARKET
for jumping on a
the 2000+ more computer oriented,
more profitable
train resulting in todays (Feb2023) situation:
closed shops for A PREVIOUSLY RICH MANIFOLD
OF materials and tools:
closed down industrial production of SUCH
AVAILABLE high quality tools:
a shut down market of BEFORE VERY useful
handicraft materials and tools:
a most profound shut down of market and
trade on these before (1900s) prosperous details;
all apparently because
STATE
ADMINISTRATIONS GENERAL IDEA OF CULTURE takes no responsibility in
THAT:
business enterprise
cannot keep up with technology, but aspires to govern it, control it, own it:
Not one word HumanRight.
The personnel
does not even understand the concept.
DURING PRACTICALLY THE WHOLE 1900s 100 years of trade, market and growing refinement of instrumentation mechanics the individual human was offered many opportunities to develop on personal skills with help of these in some cases very fine instrumentation and tools technology. Now (Feb2023) its previous market is practically stone dead.
Business enterprise demands a special battery driven hand held handcuffed point plate
demanding a »join the World Wide cookies movement not one word HumanRight recognition mentioning»
if the person wants to see what the Corresponding Paper Less Internet Shop contains.
Otherwise: no access.
World Wide Business Enterprise Internet Organizations: stop killing humanity.
Business enterprise demands on an international TRADE process that (type, Swedish example hundreds of upset complaints, but national state and world jurisdiction gives no help UPS-like package delivering companies) the buyer must not be engaged or involved in HumanRight recognition details
because the UPS personnel, as documented, partly has poor local language education (recommendation to contact UPS-personnel in ½-PolandEnglish), and partly a documented completely zero understanding of general HumanRight details: THE COMPANY GENERATES CONFLICTS AS the buyer is not allowed to use his national post office service (to get his US pack home to Sweden), because the standard UPS instance hijacks the package, removes it away from the buyer unless UPS cooperative: must answer phone when UPS instance calls, no previous notification the UPS personnel has, documented, poor or none social HumanRights Training communication experience: does not understand the concept.
In a special documented case, a UPS instance personnel demanded extra payment for an already signed and payed delivery merchandise, under threat of jurisdictional prosecution. On several contacts with the personnel, trying to reset the situation to normal, the UPS personnel (ending up on some 15 different UPS individuals, spread out over different global locations) very well yes excused itself for having committed a faulty process, but informed that the error could not be repaired (the part where the UPS personnel demanded extra payment under threat of jurisdictional prosecution if it was not payed within the specified time, after the merchandise was delivered, signed and payed).
Some of the documented victims has expressed it so They should be equipped with a robbers hood.
No world jurisdictional help. No more open ordered INDIVIDUAL market and trade.
The Death of Civilization.
Internet Business Enterprise as reigned in itself apparently and provably kills humanity.
World State Governments:
stop killing humanity
stop killing international trade
stop killing international market
stop practicing slavery and trafficking on humanity as if tagged personal property cattle
Take the Swedish company Clas Ohlson as an example (Once:The Swedish Great Handicraft Post Order Shop):
Founded 1918 it fed the whole nation wide population with handicraft tools on a comparable high level of selective merchandise of which NOTHING exists today (2023):
gold smith tools, 0.15 mM high quality metal saw blades, copper, brass and steel bars and pipes in selected dimensions, ball bearing details, cog-wheels an cog-bars, miniature hobby metal lathes with many different accessories, pillar drill strands and tripods, drilling machines on a miniature scale, normal and bigger, all the tools and material any individual human would wish for AN ACCESS IN making CONSTRUCTIONS on a small hobby scale electronics, mechanics, you name it: grinding, drilling, lathing.
Paradise almost. What was not »perfect» could be fixed.
After 2000 the company AND ITS WORLD ASSOCIATED BUSINESS FRIENDS started this:
GET RID OF IT all of it.
By 2010, practically all of it: gone. Just exterminated out from the market.
The individual possibility that once existed: gone. No ACCESSING QUALITY tools anymore on that level of availability that had been on the Clas Ohlson marked trade during its 1900s history.
Aftermath: It becomes extensively and painfully harder to find any shop at all if at all that has any alike quality details to offer. The cultural global situation paints up something resembling A TECHNOLOGICAL RECESSION: turning the clock backwards, ending up today (2023): practically nothing available at all.
All services suspended (John Wick took his Mustang, and killed his dog: not good. Story to be continued).
Business Enterprise killed Technology Evolution.
If anyone can: disclaim. Show some example.
We will surrender immediately.
THE BOTTOM LINE:
The World Business Enterprise
has all possible means of preserving a reached marker of scientific welfare with high quality processes for mankind each fucking human being to enjoy and develop from.
But as we know:
business enterprise in itself takes no knowledge arguments.
You drive with that fucking human right (Swedish Court Standard, as documented).
business enterprise in itself understands not HumanRight: knowledge, technology.
Not one word HumanRight Recognition. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.
(Swedish Court as documented: That is not our responsibility).
business enterprise in itself APPARENTLY understands not CIVILIZATION.
(read: Swedish Court, prosecutor, police, public state administrations in general: not one word).
Because KNOWLEDGE in itself is i s : spellt i with a following s as so related and exemplified an abstract to business enterprise in itself
business enterprise in itself CANNOT KEEP UP WITH technology:
But it not only very much wants to, but apparently also has
developed an idea that it Leads Its Development:
no access unless cookies consent. Not one word HumanRight.
Give them Caps with text: »less developed»:
business enterprise APPARENTLY does NOT understand the value of knowledge, technological innovation: contributional individuality: intelligence. Say again. Give examples. Show us in itself.
And so IT intelligence 1900; reached marker of high technological status was dumped on the great scene of human history state administrations and their cheer for building the world societies on ideas outside human right recognition for The Wealthy Happy Liberated Business Enterprise Joy to jump on to a more profitable Vehicle and suck its content out til emptied, for next victim ..
the (2000+) exploding interest for Computer Accessories, dumping further availability OF the unique culturally human developed reached high status marker of mechanics during the 1900s the individual humans best friend.
Business Enterprise in itself gave a shit on that one.
Give them Caps with text: »less developed».
Selling Gold for Ashes Warning Text Add blinking LEDs RedBlue.
Many stupid things (we) humans have done. But that one will easily with any branch in a historical contest and unthreatened take the the winner price to be of the most imbecile and low level stupid that has ever seen a shoe under the stars: state administration responsibility for Defense. Exterminated. Shredded.
business enterprise in itself apparently is and can be understood, exemplified and related as
one Full 100% Oblivion LetsKill Technology and Humanity, in its constant search for more profit.
Not one word human right recognition. Not one word.
Slavery and trade is all it cares about when reigned on its own throne.
Do disclaim it all if found any rational reason.
We will surrender immediately.
THE (Nov2021) DISCOVERED COMPOSITION
[] CWON ¦ CAP ¦ BeEN ¦ MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ BioEquivalent1 ¦ Bio6 ¦ 1254 ¦ Plant Oxygen Filter
[] CWON ¦ BioEK1-10 ¦ water came from the outer ¦ Photosynthesis ¦ TheComplete ¦ MLP ¦
MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ same mathematical rank ¦ TheREVELATION
¦ AllKeplerMath
¦ CHART1 ¦
planetary
perihelion precession phenomena ¦
See also (further) in EarthMASS.