DELPHI4Test2014 BildHantering ¦ Jan2022 — UNIVERSUMS HISTORIA | 2011V4 ¦ 2022I18 | aproduction | Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-05-20 YMD ¦ HumanRight is a knowledge domain

content · webbSÖK äMNESORD på denna sida Ctrl+F • SubjectINDEX • all files • helpStart DISPOSITION

Vidareutvecklat Från DELPHI 4 Test 2011

T2014BildHantering — HUVUDDELEN AV VERKTYGEN MAN BEHÖVER FÖR AVANCERAD DATORANVÄNDNING I TEXT OCH BILD

GENERAL IMAGE HANDLING IN Delphi4Test2022 ¦ ImportExport

DISPOSITION | Teckenförklaringar: MusKLICKVänster | Höger: | — RullaMushjulet FRÅN | MOTDig: |

image handling — toning and merging

FLEET STATES — DELPHI4Test2011.htm#BILDHANTERING

MOVE AND TRANSPORT — T2014A.htm#MovingObjects

NAVIGATION — T2014A.htm#Image1

precision rotate flip invert

Addition 9May2023

CLARIFYING The Energy Law IN RELATED PHYSICS

mass can be destroyed — because mass — ENERGY — cannot be created NOR DESTROYED: mass has — IS APPARENTLY GIVEN — no reasonable logic rational ultimate origin

WIND — air mass move — is generated by TEMPERATURE DIFFERENCES [general gas law math]: Our SUN has no such physical generatingt feature. Earth ROTATION has.

BASIC PRINCIPLES — clarifying, explaining and exemplifying general (image handling) mathematics and physics

Explaining the related foundation of The Energy Law — why energy cannot be created nor destroyed, only converted

Nearest appending htm-documents [2023]:

T2014PantB.htm — THE FINAL CONNECTION, details in Experimental Confirmations

T2014Graf.htm — AppendagePantB, FULL DYNAMICS with CosmicIntro

TheREVELATION — THE QUANTITY INDEPENDENT related, and the revolutionary science history from Kepler [1571+] and further — with THE SELF LOCKING ITERATING THEOREM: what makes life Build;

the historical perspective we must adopt if understanding the basics of nature is important — the PRINCIPLE natural properties of and in mathematics and physics

COMPARE THIS ISSUE: why is it that life chemistry (LifeOrigin) apparently assembles life forms in such a way that these harmonize — not exclusively exterminates each other species — forming a general cyclic biological isotope? What’sUp? What is the innate natural mechanics for such an advanced assembling technique? Say.

BIOLOGICAL LIFE — and our atomic universe and all individual solutions — WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT THIS ALL INDIVIDUAL SPECIES MATHEMATICAL processual PHYSICS’ PROPERTY:

The iterator mechanics:

The functional root point SLOPE — the actual root point’s functional tangent or gradient — determines whether the root point — our solution the processual process — is iteratively possible if it can be realized or not. It so is if the functional root point’s Slope as geometric-mathematically so defined lies inside the shaded iterative domain cone ±45° the general 2D xy conventional mathematical system. If outside, the iteration process will recede with still growing difference between the successively iterated numerical values and no convergent solution exists — we immediately associate to life chemistry action principles:

— The (EnergyLaw) never created by no human hand established LAWS of mathematics apparently determine the LAWS of Life and the properties of atomic and nuclear physics as well: read it and weep (The quote in EX2).

— IF the reader can find only one single relatable (that which associates to reason) exception from this stated order: please share. We will surrender immediately (it would be like a clear zenith sunshine at midninght .. byebye Cansas ..).

REF — UH archives:

EDITION 9Aug2002 — Elementary Thermodynamics — CHAPTER 3 in Related Physics —

BASIC PRINCIPLES OF RELATED PHYSICS — from: script 2003-01-10

BasicPrinciplesOfPhysics.doc

MOST (TNED ¦ TNEDbegin — how it all started [around 1980+ (INTEL8080)]) VERSATILE SCIENTIFIC IMPROVEMENTS:

0. deducing the neutron (N3m20) from Planck constant (h=mcr) [1993+]

1. deducing the periodic system from (Sw., kärnmatrisiska algoritmen) nuclear matrice’s algorithm (simple Kepler area momentum resonances)

2. deducing the corresponding SPECTRUM AND QUANTUM NUMBERS for cross referring comparisons (»The enhanced Bohr Model»)

Electron mass components ¦ The ELECTRON — Lamb,G-factor, Casimir; Van der Waals ¦ Electron’s Bubble chamber tracks ¦ NeutronFragments — Part1 Part2 ¦ Nuclide formations — the nuclide charts

3. discovering the neutron square (elliptic equations) apparently defining (exact or very close to exact) experimentally measured atomic masses (HOP, CODATA, BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY): modern academic nuclear theory apparently becomes outclassed (UH is launched @Internet Aug2008)

modern academy uses nuclear mass defects (no precise atom physics explanation) while related physics uses full atomic mass defects; these two have no here known common math

4. The LIST: cross referencing foremost contradictions (related and quoted examples where possible) between MAC and TNED in basic physics (and its mathematics)

There are many others, but tabling them here becomes as extensive as the entire UH production (2023: some 150 htm-documents+): appropriate linkage guides further:

• errors in physics and mathematics are not allowed in this production: it is intended for illumination — explanation — on all knowledge domains, or not at all.

BASICALLY EXTENDED NEWTON’S THREE LAWS DEFINITIONS — Kepler-Galilei-Newton-Bradley-Euler-Planck basics

UNLESS THOROUGHLY UNDERSTOOD mathematics and physics will be a hopeless riddle:

(as is so testified in modern academic educational corridors:

ask the student — ask the general pedestrian: ».. math is my favorite subject ..» .. it is such a joy ..):

»Zeno’s Theorem» ¦ ZENONS TEOREM

(a term coined here in UiverseHistory only due to its historical role; modern academy apparently cannot differentiate between difference and differential: »continuity issue»):

THE INDESTRUCTIBILITY OF THE INTERVAL — the indestructibility of physics: »the — apprehensive — indestructibility of the universe»:

———————————————

PhysicsFirst ¦ STATE —— relating The Quantity Independent ∞ [ Euler equivalents ] ¦ ATOM TRIANGLE, definitions with Quotes —— Explaining related definitions ¦

The way we apprehend existence:

• WE CAN SEE THE LINE — crystal illustration — but it has no physical [ xyz ] dimension or existence, no way.

• Without it, mathematics — and physics: its understanding, its apprehension — becomes an impossible exercise.

— If the reader has other experiences: please share. We will surrender immediately.

Definition:

STATE: physical determination of a relational regional or local parametric condition

— during one and only one momentary not changing point of time as different from any other;

But — without it, no mathematical physics:

:

STATE — no change — has no physical representation:

absolute position determination during no time — no change — at all is a physical impossibility.

Physics defines restless constant variations: no reference of rest exists in physics

[ mass, charge, spin — Planck constant: h = mcr: The Neutron THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS in related physics].

THEREOF The [The Seven Related physical] Principles — never mentioned or related in modern academy: searched for. Never found:

P1:

APARC Absolute Physical Reference (orig. 2002: SELA, StatE-LAw) [statics]:

• no state — interval (»Zeno’s Theorem») — exists cannot be apprehended or understood unless based on interval without change

a change must always relate to a previous state — a balance, an equilibrium no change a unique instrumental [digital] readout on a unique Moment

Original 2002: First law of physics

Only known relatable possible state law condition:

momentary equilibrium — no change: preservation of an absolute momentary balance: no change:

[ the solid silent stable never changing screen whereon reality is projected — »the Thing which makes us HEAR»]

only one single state condition as different from any other state condition

P2:

FUNTOP Fundamental Theorem of Physics (Proof: APARC) [dynamics]:

• physics relates to equilibrium — balance: not to system;

• the laws of physics hold FOR systems, never IN systems: there are no »inertial systems». That is a modern invention — not Newton’s. Quotes in INERTIA.

Physical state determination HENCE: equilibrium (study flying birds: perfect balance in every apprehensive moment of time).

• One single (digital) instrumental readout represents one single ideal physical state (local, regional xyz positioning without change).

Original 2002: Fundamental Theorem of Physics

P3:

POM Principle of Motion — Energy Law (Proof: APARC):

• impulse (p = mv: STATE condition) precedes force (F = ma = m·v/t = p/t)

No force can appear unless taken from something that already has motion.

Proof: APARC.

— An interval — STATE — must exist prior to force;

— the interval is any ∆d with optimal variation a=dv/dt;

— as the interval is indestructible (APARC ¦ »Zeno’s Theorem»), so is also the move (a: v=0 → v>0);

— and hence the principal living force (the [inductive] move [magnetism]);

— and thus the energy: E = Fd = mad = m(dv/dt)d .. E = mK/t = mvr/t = hf = mcr·1/t = mc² ..

• Energy — interval — cannot be created nor destroyed as the apprehension of an interval has the same property.

— THE INTERVAL’S INDESTRUCTIBILITY (illustrated geometry: the Pythagorean square) guarantees that no motion can appear except through an already existing force. The force, or its innate acceleration, a = dv/dt, demands an already existing interval (STATE condition, based on equilibrium). Interval’s indestructibility builds thereby the foundation constituting the principle of motion, and thereby the energy law.

• »the universe cannot be destroyed».

— See also POM1&2.

Original 2002: First principle of Physics

The G-energy Solver Equation:

(Our only problem to solve was: so: how can it continue to exist? Test »The G-energy Solver Equation») ..

CosmoA — CosmicIntro:

The G-energy Solver Equation [»TEGESE»]:

GRAVITATION LAW — first developed by Isaac Newton [PRINCIPIA 1687] from Kepler-Galilei basics [ForceLaw F=ma ¦ w CentralAction ¦ KeplerMath]:

G = r²(a=F/m)/m₂ [ »Gram», m₂ = central mass reference], G universal gravitation constant

Convergence and Divergence

Convergence and Divergence

CONVERGENCE — gravitation principle (GRIP): gravity: mass

• equal to all matter, cannot be shielded from: time independent; gravitation does not propagate: time independent

———————————————————————————

DIVERGENCE — divergence principle (DEEP): light, electricity, magnetism, heat

• not equal to all matter, can be shielded from: time dependent; light does propagate [c0 = 2.99792458 T8 M/S]: no mass

———————————————————————————

Light propagation [Planck energy E = hf: electric field] is governed by the presence of mass through local gravitation:

LIGHT PROPAGATION DOES NOT FEEL CENTRIFUGATION: light is massless — E=hf-quanta [atomic property] uses »photons»:

KINEMATICS — motion without specific mass aspects [»Hollywood»] ¦ KINETICS — motion with specific mass aspects [Mechanics]

See [Max Planck was right] all the [Photoelectric Effect] details in

LIGHT PHYSICS DOES NOT CONNECT KINETICS[‡]

——————————————— never clarified in modern academy ¦ w² = Gm / r:

PotentialBarrier ¦ Q ¦ Light’s Gravitational Dependency: divergence ← · →convergence •mass: try to deduce it and compare ¦:

c/c₀ = (1 – w²/c²) ..................... Einstein cannot reach c=0: »time ceasing according to Einstein»

c/c₀ = (1 – 2w²/c₀²) .................. Schwarzchild cannot explain negative — vector math results, see TheF-Rank — force divergence

c/c₀ = (1 – w²/cc₀) ..................... Related physics: the divergence constant c0 is guaranteed conserved independent of gravitation

as deduced from and through CHEOPS RECTANGLE: bd=h² — circle-hyperbolic equation:

• c0-conservation with fully explainable cosmological dynamics, concluding modern idea as primitive

Q

never deduced

in the modern academic teaching system

Divergence [space inductance for vacuum] — the propagation of light, heat, electric field — is massless [mass can shield off divergence: divergence, light, is massless] and isolated no mass to each single ideal [divergent] mass free space xyz POINT — governed by the strength of local gravitation [presence of mass affects/shields light propagation]:

a = dv/dt, v=c; a = dc/dt; dc = c; a = c/dt: Q: the electric charge — never deduced in the modern academic teaching system:

:

Q = √ (m/R)(A/dt) — R, electric resistance R is not a property of mechanics [it is a property of space: space-inductance]:

ACCELERATING ELECTRIC CHARGES preserve and conserve the electric charge Q independent of mass variations: m/R = constant.

no mass is created, no mass is destroyed.

• Q AS A PHYSICAL PROPERTY COLLAPSES WITH A LIMITED (∆) TIME (t) FACTOR:

— Q² = (m/R)(A/t) = (m/R)(r²/t) = (m/R)(rc);

— With a fix value for mRc, Q changes with distance r

— which we know not is the case in physics:

— the electric charge (Q) is a constant with a constant mass (m), space resistance (R) and divergence (c);

— m and R can — and do — change proportionally (electric acceleration) with a conserved constant Q.

The TEGESE factor (n→∞):

EG, gravitational energy:

The (principle variation) TEGESE factor (n→∞) [»n approaches the quantity independent»] reflects

time dependency; EG/G apparently points out a principle [(n→∞) endlessly fractally dividing]

mass defining structure [Planck Fractals h=mcr in related physics];

— Given the limited divergence (n→∞) speed (c₀), mass — gravitation — can only be destroyed IF, and only if, there are two opposed ELECTRIC CHARGES constituting all mass: ±e (See The 1818e nuclear composition):

• as ±e approaches (COEI conservation of energy by induction in related physics), the (n→∞) TEGESE factor is ANNIHILATED:

• the ±e annihilations[‡pair annihilation, related in detail] are pumping the mass-energy out into surrounding (atomic) charged masses (E=UQ).

RELATED LINKS:

———————————————

Q — PlanckEquivalents ¦ PotentialBarrier ¦ Light’s Gravitational Dependency — Einstein-Schwarzchild-Related¦ Max Planck was right — related physics says:

• it’s not about the math, it is about its interpretative connection to related physics: Experimental Confirmations

Available Gravitational Energy: G · (n→∞)m₂²/r(n→∞) : SUPPLY(m→∞) – HEAT(m→γ) = The K-cell

the cosmic central ever pulsating K-cell : mathematics’ simple solution

• It has always been standing there. But modern academic ideation (1800+) came to deny it — heavily and destructively.

• Simple. And Very »Easy to understand». In fact, the most hard of all to ACCEPT. Try to break it down: no yet experienced success.

• IF the reader has Any RELATED opposing suggestions: please share. Searched for. None yet found. Search continues.

Energy law’s two divisions — a=dv/dt acceleration math basic

POM 1 and 2:

Energy law’s two divisions

Related physics EXPLAINS

THE PRINCIPLE BEHIND HOW AND WHY MASS CAN BE DESTROYED (Sun/star physics) — because mass cannot be created

POM 1: principle of motion, energy law’s first part —— energy law’s first main clause:

mass m in a=am/m=F/m cannot be created or formed because a [the interval during a] in m=ma/m=F/a must be provided;

POM 2: principle of motion, energy law’s second part —— energy law’s second main clause:

mass can be destroyed (m→γ) as

mass m in a=am/m=F/m [a: the interval during a] is indestructible certifying the actual energy conservation;

In the latter case a is only transposed (»transported») over onto other surrounding (±e atomic) masses (heat, light)

without the aid of any transporting mass — only by the massless property and nature of divergence (c: electric induction action):

• energy is principally conserved by the certified preservation of the indestructible interval;

• mass is destroyed, and with it its gravitation, electric charge and field (The TEGESE factor);

• mass cannot hence be returned — because a in it (The TEGESE factor connecting the ±e mass structure) — must be provided:

• once dissolved (n→∞ ¦ ±e), it can never be returned.

• The possibility of creating or forming m through a is hence excluded because there is no binding between a and m; a kan be released out of m, a can be transposed onto m. But m can neither be released out of a or be transposed or transformed onto a, and thereby not be created or formed by a.

Shorter:

Whereas the interval is indestructible (the STATE principle: APARC) a cannot be created and thereby neither m=ma/a=F/a and hence nor Fd=E:

♦ energy — mass — cannot be created. It must already exist (life, universe, existence has no CANNOT BE GIVEN A RATIONAL REASONABLE ultimate origin):

• no here known rational or reasonable argumentation exists to disclaim these concluded statements. Searched for. Not found. Search continues.

— So in particle physics: mass and energy can exchange on given quantities (excitation procedures), but the idea of mass creation has no physically relatable provable substance. See in specific The Particle Proof explaining that energy cannot create mass: based on already familiar particle ranks: inverted beta decay’s proof.

P4:

NEWTON’S THREE — NEWTON’S THREE

NEONS (Isaac Newton’s three original):

1. STATE

2. CHANGE — the force law (F=ma)

3. INERTIA — preservation of (resisting) change in state (induction in electrophysics in explicit)

in mechanics: resistance against absolute — immediate — move on push [»the state — FUNTOP — factor]

P5: GRIP

P6: DEEP

P7:

PASTOM — Principle (Principal) Structure of Mass (TEGESE extension) — mass destruction basics (Sun physics)

For m to be destroyed — Planck energy E = hf = mcr/t = mc² (general: complete dissolution of the atomic nucleus into heat and light) —

• m must NOT by principle contain any final definite (stiff) constituents (the atomic nucleus has no particle structure);

Nature illustrates — HINTS AT — particle physics — what it is and what it is not:

TYPICALLY AS HINTED AT: Water drops — particles — exist ONLY OUTSIDE THE NORMAL WATER [ATOMIC] volume. Never inside. We can use that property FOR TEST to describe — not define — the atomic nucleus.

• The atomic nucleus as such is particle free. Resemblance: core [Earth], surroundings [Heavens ..] .. easy to grasp stuff from around 5 .. no big deal .. We use a [np] ±e-structure terminology to describe atomic nuclei [AZ-chart] compositions.

• The m-dissolution inevitably hence must conform mathematically to the (TEGESE) factor [(n→∞) endless fractal division]:

• m = (n→∞) · m/(n→∞) → 1 = (n→∞) · 1/(n→∞) = 1: no parts. No mother god loving way.

MASS — gravitation’s fundamental form (the atomic nucleus) — can be understood equivalently as composed of an unlimited set of parts (J=mvr ¦ mass on basic Kepler math) which undergoes a corresponding restless division [on the principle of light’s divergence c₀ velocity (inside the electric-magnetic ±e mass structure of the nucleus)] (the TEGESE) factor n→∞ ¦ often met in practical geometry/integral mathematics) so that no smallest particle can be understood to exist inside the atomic nucleus (the Planck constant h = mcr).

MASS as a structure can hence be related to a structure of ±β-charges — with ±-spin in the form of (Planck fractal) RINGS (mcr): mass over acceleration:

• The fundamental mass form is summing a zero momentum and a zero charge by opposite spins and charges:

• The fundamental mass form needs no refill to act and work in its mass-charge-spin existence.

• The sum of all moments in the atom is zero.

Se further in The Neutron — related physics deduction of THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS from Planck Constant.

Our mission (hence) became to — thoroughly — examine all known details as derived from known experimental physics in order to exclude the related physical statements IF be based on misconceptions, direct errors and faulty statements:

• errors are not allowed here. No way. All related instrumentation it is — or should be. No exceptions (exact computerized data plot).

— Our traditional modern academy managing education (1800+) has presented to us several seemingly impossible existential enigmas. In all of them it seems there are no real true (fathomable, decent, serious and reasonable) answers. Perhaps the most prominent is the one academic suggestion that is based on the established scientific community idea (unknown source) that

• the over all possible cosmic existential MASS is limited. That (TEGESE) is:

DESPITE THE SIMPLE NATURAL FACT THAT WHEREVER WE LOOK, THERE IS ALWAYS MORE BEHIND ..

Compare (the Issue in point) The Cosmic Intro (relatively simple already familiar school math examples).

It seems that modern academic ideation has (was born out of) a general deep contempt for the simple and obvious natural explanations. Say: So deep, that the most prominent of them never even became investigated (Ex: CWON: Earth crust isotopic composition versus the entire Earth mass quantity, all collected geology data during the 1900s).

THE ORIGIN OF LIFE

RELATED PHYSICS SAYS:

As so concluded from and related to the energy law: mass — energy — has no origin:

• THERE is no ULTIMATE origin to life, related physics says.

— IF that would be the case: what are we left with? Test Answer: full and complete HARMONY — that modern academic thinking never even hinted at.

• That is a dreadful — and perhaps painful depending on personal inducement — observation (seen from the view of modern academic ideas 1800+) after an extensive and tedious examination (AddMay2023) on the entire cosmic scene: The TEGESE factor: [(n→∞) endless fractal division];

• BIOLOGY — life — follows and is of course based upon the internal atomic nuclear structure.

• Same principal properties, same NEVER CREATED nature:

• Expansion — growth, evolution: chemical connectivity: structural formation: apparently for sharing The joy of Knowledge:

— Education. Technology — WITH nature, not against. A point YET to be observed FROM THE STATE AUTHORITIES in our time.

concentric atomic production CAP, complete whole number solution CWON

CAP with CWON — apparently the death of modern (1800+) academic cosmological ideas — show me I’m wrong: I will surrender immediately

All collected geophysical data during the 1900s

— apparently never compiled inside the modern academic corridors

World Business Enterprises:

FURTHER SUSTAINED BIOLOGY?

THE ROOT-WORKS — biological fungi (Simard2012) —

is impoverished in all provable exact same extension: What? THAT out of which FUNGI

— the ALIVE bio-molecular fine mask distribution network of SHARED nutrition —

APPARENTLY we and all animals have appeared out of, through a rough undisturbed 3Gy

natural biological process: Leaf&Needle, the solar energy uptake agency by ALIVE trees:

the main global carbon-oxygen cyclic maintaining machinery also apparently, woman,

guaranteeing — certifying — a biological health and care for all FURTHER life on Earth:

Period 1800-2000: more than 30% of the original natural forest area removed — and (GlobalWATCHERS) counting

WHAT REPLACES THE REMOVED REDUCTION?

FURTHER SUSTAINED BIOLOGY — apparently under heavy attack: WHAT REPLACES THE REMOVED LIFE POWER? UN: Educate us.

The Forest apparently was intended — life chemistry — for sustaining life on Earth As Life. Not to be removed or profited on by any kind of means. Say again, world business:

— Removing alive forests means removing alive humanity.

Dmax — CWON from CAP [see further links below], further explained an related in the linked illustration below:

WITH 100% FOREST COVER: LAST 1812 — MLN1812IPCC2013Graph284ppmvCO2 ¦ TheEarthMASS ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ All collected geological 1900s Earth crust data

Period 1800-2000 [ForestWORLD2012] more than 30% of the original 100% $ covered forest CO2 cyclic biogas area has been removed by human hand business enterprise — and increasing [GlobalWATCHERScounting]. The above last 1812 natural relational conditions on which life evolved on Earth does nor hold any more. A global toxic alarm should be constantly heard and seen in all media. But state governments persistently continue to reject a natural 100% forest natural recovery, apparently not understanding the gravity of the global situation, and thereby responsible for further biological hazards; Nature definitely will NOT suffice with a continuing 70% bio-cyclic life chemistry function from a 100% original natural one: zero bald cuts with zero killed alive trees and their full root fungi species chemistry for all evolved life on Earth. No way. World business enterprise is responsible for profiting on this situation — by DRIFT. Not plan: not one word HumanRight. Not a sound. Not a spell. Not a hint.

The main issue is NOT about the fossil part. It is about deforestation — the only agent left to account for the still exponentially climbing increase in atmospheric CO2 content.

• The world business enterprise institutions apparently does NOT understand the complex — and have no interest in IT either, as IT apparently states: the feast is over:

• Humanity is under attack — from a DRIFT, not plan, by consequences of NO — zero — HumanRight recognition: ideas of jurisdictional ownership of The LIFE humanity was developed ON: Leaf&Needle [ The $ factor], the Sun energy up-taking agency for life evolution on Earth: no profit in the constant cyclic $ factor. Just a provision for LIFE: Under attack.

IN ALL FURTHER UniverseHistory production TESTS we preferentially use this as above illustrated and compiled resulting apparently very precised given Earth mass figure 5.975 T24 KG ±<3GRAM — for tests wherever there is an offer for any the slightest chance of opportunity to question the result. The rJ feature has further connectivity in The Contracted Construct — our geological history has left us in a foggy state where proving details challenge us: rJ and the Cheops Pyramid.

• Every single material celestial body in the universe — related physics says — shows exactly the same building up physical principle. Only difference between different bodies [stone bodies, gas bodies, planets, stars] is their initial neutron mass. See a related physics general classification in the DiaSquare.

———————————————

TheEarthMASS ¦ CWON ¦ CAP ¦ The Galactic Building ¦ The Solar Systems in The Milky Way ¦ The Meteorite Proofs ¦ TheNEUTRONsquare

CAP: Concentric Atomic Production — CWON: Complete Whole Number-solution

From K-cell heat physics — after contraction collecting mass back to a new initial neutron state follows a new expansion era (336 Gy) related physics states

See The DETONATION detailed in related mathematical physics.

IN MODERN CORRIDORS THIS ALTERNATIVE HAS NO REPRESENTATION ¦ Tt simplifies 10^±

The atomic nucleus cannot be compressed: it is alreadu standing on a Zero [TEGESE ¦ TEGESEa];

GRAVITATION — mass: the atomic nucleus — CANNOT BE COMPRESSED

GRAVITATION IN THE ATOMIC NUCLEUS does NOT lie in its volume. It lies in its SHELL — Planck fractal ring toroid hollow structure as in TEGESEa, related physics says.

There are many examples of stupid things in human history. Perhaps the most prominent such pet is the idea of endless gravitation — in a volume. IT effectively banns — kills — any atomic nucleus deduction:

The energy law, and the very deep detailed explanation why mass CAN be destroyed.

Related physics Convergence and divergence;

Celestial bodies begin to form from a Dmax (massive neutron bodies Planck constant h=mcr on 1.82 T17 KG/M³) — related physics deduction of the atomic nucleus: [fast forward explanation:] proofs appear from collecting Earth crust composition data on the basic isotopic — precise — content. Meteorite proofs finalize the verifications. Moon history takes a lead.

— In modern academic quarters, all the geological (Moon and others) data lie on the table — except one: the modern academic TIME window is too short.

COSMOLOGY in modern academic corridors apparently did evolve from the most primitive of all possible human existential ideas: intelligence came first with modern academy 1800+:

The birth of the darkest of all the ages in the history of human civilization — along with the most promising: instrumentation, experimental physics: knowledge by nature.

— The overall picture in modern corridors (hence) resembles a Book of Knowledge where essential parts have been removed.

— Related physics explains the how and why of it — or not at all — in detail (AllKeplerMath).

Epilogue:

WHY is modern (academic) thinking so — in all general tasks, no exceptions — averse against Nature?

Test answer;

— »IF», modern academy seems to plead, »there WOULD be such a High Intelligence in Nature herself, HOW COME we don’t experience IT», modern academic thinking seems to PROVE the whole enigma by its excellent sense for drawing conclusions.

Compare:

— You mean Nature must visit the Idiot to asses its genuine with-borne Intelligence? Oh Please.

WHY IS CHILDREN — and even animals — so acquainted with the basics from birth? What’sUp?

HumanRight. The only domain of knowledge there ever was; gravitation, electricity (heat, light, magnetism): LIFE. Mathematics. Say again.

In modern academy: not one word. Not even a hint.

THE REASON ”why not” APPARENTLY LIES IN THE INDUCEMENT OF A GENERAL 24/7 ATTITUDE:

— ASK for truth, and IT will visit. Make a REASONING DEBATE with her — give and take ARGUMENTS which inevitably will expose the personal kinks; write thew down, work them out; walk or run in the woods (if there are any left to feel joy inside of): reason, expose, debate — and then collect the harvest and see what has become of the work. Never, not in one occasion, SHE fails. Say again. Best friend. Worst enemy.

CrimDef:

The foundation of cultural violence and attacks on humanity

TEST DEFINITION OF CRIMINALITY:

• A class A-people appear (Europe 1800+) certifying the B-class to exercise obedience under threat of punishment — in order to secure the survival of the A-class cultural idea:

• ”law and order” (»I like pissing on my fellowman’s head ..»: Say again. Come again .. ).

Zero HumanRight mentioning.

• Not because of a deliberate PLAN to create disorder or anything the like.

• Just because of the resulting DRIFT from NOT recognizing the fundamentals:

• CHILDREN — and animals even — grasp It excellently. Just by being Born.

content:

innehåll: SÖK på denna sida Ctrl+F

DELPHI4Test2011

ämnesrubriker

innehåll

DELPHI4Test2014 BildHantering

Föregående:

DELPHI4Test2011.htm — huvuddokument — HJÄLPDOKUMENT FÖR DELPHI4Test2011

DELPHI4Test2011ref.htm — kompletterande

DELPHI4Test2011HELP.htm — särskild beskrivning

Addition 9May2023

CLARIFYING The Energy Law IN RELATED PHYSICS

ZenosTheorem — coined term in UH

Definition — The Seven Related physics Principles

P1

P2

P3

TEGESEa — The G-energy Solver Equation

ConDiv — Convergence and Divergence ¦ Q

TEGESE — The TEGESE factor (n→∞)

ElawTwoP3 — Energy law’s two divisions — a=dv/dt acceleration math basic

P4

P5

P6

P7

LifeOrigin

Epilogue

CrimDef

content

referenser

MAC, här ofta använd förkortning för Modern ACademy — etablerad vetenskap sedan början av 1800-talet

often used abbreviation in UH (UniverseHistory) for Modern ACademy 1800+

TNED — Related PHYSICS And MATHEMATICS — Se särskild djupbeskrivning av innebörden i begreppet relaterad framställning.

(Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics), eller Toroidnukleära Elektromekaniska Dynamiken är den dynamiskt ekvivalenta resultatbeskrivning som följer av härledningarna i Planckringen h=m_nc₀r_n, analogt Atomkärnans Härledning. Beskrivningen enligt TNED är relaterad, vilket innebär: alla, samtliga, detaljer gör anspråk på att vara fullständigt logiskt förklarbara och begripliga, eller så inte alls. Med TNED förstås (således) också

RELATERAD FYSIK OCH MATEMATIK. Se även uppkomsten av termen TNED i Atomkärnans Härledning.

SHORT ENGLISH — TNED in general is not found @INTERNET except under this domain

(Universe[s]History, introduced @INTERNET 2008VII3).

TNED or Toroid Nuclear Electromechanical Dynamics is the dynamically equivalent resulting description following the deductions in THE PLANCK RING, analogous AtomNucleus’ Deduction. The description according to TNED is related, meaning: all, each, details claim to be fully logically explainable and understandable, or not at all. With TNED is (hence) also understood RELATED PHYSICS AND MATHEMATICS. See also the emergence of the term TNED in AtomNucleus’ Deduction.

Senast uppdaterade version: 2023-05-20.

*END.

Stavningskontrollerat 2023-05-20 ¦ 20Maj2023.

rester

*

DELPHI4Test2014MANUAL ·

√ τ π ħ ε UNICODE — ofta använda tecken i matematiskt-tekniskt-naturvetenskapliga beskrivningar

σ ρ ν ν π τ γ λ η ≠ √ ħ ω → ∞ ≡

Ω Φ Ψ Σ Π Ξ Λ Θ Δ

α β γ δ ε λ θ κ π ρ τ φ ϕ σ ω ϖ ∏ √ ∑ ∂ ∆ ∫ ≤ ≈ ≥ ˂ ˃ ˂ ˃ ← ↑ → ∞ ↓

ϑ ζ ξ

Pilsymboler, direkt via tangentbordet: Alt+24 ↑; Alt+25 ↓; Alt+26 →; Alt+27 ←; Alt+22 ▬

Alt+23 ↨ — även Alt+18 ↕; Alt+29 ↔

DELPHI4Test2011.htm

Senast uppdaterade version: 20 maj 2023 | 04:03:39 | 2023-05-20. [GMT+1]^Solar[GMT+2]^Industry

Vidareutvecklat Från DELPHI 4 Test 2011 — DELPHI4Test2011ref.htm#AnvändningSupportInstallation

T2014Reg — HUVUDDELEN AV VERKTYGEN MAN BEHÖVER FÖR AVANCERAD DATORANVÄNDNING I TEXT OCH BILD ¦ Jan2022

*